Thank you, t*r

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 101 - 120 of total 169 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
Jan 23, 2013 - 12:28pm PT
So, while I don't agree with t*r's action (heck, why not just ignore the thread if it's
that bad for you), but I certainly do understand it.

Yeah, I understand all sorts of unacceptable behavior. I understand why people throw tempter tantrums (they want attention), try to control other people (they want power), etc. You can bump it up to robbery, murder, whatever, but we're more at the temper tantrum level here.
"Understanding" something doesn't make it right, or acceptable, and the people who run this site obviously don't have to put up with that crap--especially from someone who doesn't climb or have any particular interest in climbing (from what I can tell).
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Jan 23, 2013 - 12:48pm PT
Ihateplastic

Trad climber
It ain't El Cap, Oregon
Jan 23, 2013 - 01:43pm PT
I am sure some of you have personal experience with the fact that just because you have a small willie does NOT mean you are a child. A tight abdomen does not mean you are a child (don't we all want a six-pack?) A tiny buttock does not imply youth as much as it might show a dedication to exercise and a proper diet. And a happy smile is what we should all have every day. So... for those of you who imply I may have crossed a line I suggest a better understanding of the varieties in human body types. You may be a endomorph with a beer gut, sagging chest, and spreading butt but some of us (no, I do not necessarily mean me) have been blessed with a more ectomorphic build and this includes both men and women. As for those who believe I crossed a line... you are wrong and you have no idea who I am so STFU. As for those who feel their opinions should be forced down the gullet of everyone else on the planet... as you move into older life you will discover there are far more valuable ideals in the world than those of your early adulthood.

Now, I need to put together that thread about my really weird nuts!
patrick compton

Trad climber
van
Jan 23, 2013 - 01:58pm PT
good to know the internet is safe again
LuckyPink

climber
the last bivy
Jan 23, 2013 - 01:59pm PT
Ihateplastic you are outed. your post above is just another attempt to hide again.
Those girls are without a doubt prepubescent. No matter how hard you try you cannot change that.

Ihateplastic

Trad climber
It ain't El Cap, Oregon
Jan 23, 2013 - 02:04pm PT
Weird... even when I use relatively small words there are still those who can;t understand what is being said.

couchmaster

climber
pdx
Jan 23, 2013 - 02:19pm PT
No they weren't. Get over it, women come in all kinds of sizes and shapes, just like dudes. Strange isn't it.

"Those girls are without a doubt prepubescent."

Bullsh#t.

zBrown

Ice climber
chingadero de chula vista
Jan 23, 2013 - 02:22pm PT
i got it

I - hate - the - plas - tic


oh wait

I - hate - the - pla - stic

It's gotta be one of these two, the others don't make sense.




GDavis

Social climber
SOL CAL
Jan 23, 2013 - 02:26pm PT
IHP... you scratched at the sun and got burned. Wax don't hold feathers too well.
dirt claud

Social climber
san diego,ca
Jan 23, 2013 - 02:27pm PT
I would say they weren't that young for the simple fact that you would have to be a complete f*#kin idiot to post pre-pubescent woman, boys, etc.. on an internet site. With the way they are going after child porn, you really think IHATEPLASTIC would be stupid enough to post child porn? If they looked young and it was very distasteful to some that is one thing, but don't blame someone for being a child porn advocate.
GDavis

Social climber
SOL CAL
Jan 23, 2013 - 02:28pm PT
I never saw sh#t, if the models were 18 no harm no foul...
dirt claud

Social climber
san diego,ca
Jan 23, 2013 - 02:32pm PT
I say that because that is what another poster was claiming. Which makes it more ridiculous. There would have had to be 12 year old girls on there. The thread went no where near there. It was just very distasteful to some and it is getting blown out of proportion.
John M

climber
Jan 23, 2013 - 02:37pm PT
The point wasn't whether they were over 18 or not. LIkely they were. The point was that the way the pictures were presented glorified the underage look. 18 is an arbitrary age. Some people are mature before this, some people never seem to reach maturity.

Its the same as the media using women who have that heroin abuse thin look. Some women really do look that way without abusing heroin and while eating healthy. Its the glorification of the look that is the problem.

Personally.. I think a 50 year old man should get his mind off of the 18 year olds. Thats what I find kind of sick about Ihateplastics photos.
couchmaster

climber
pdx
Jan 23, 2013 - 03:08pm PT
Hugh Hefner must make you mental then....
Jingy

climber
Somewhere out there
Jan 23, 2013 - 03:14pm PT
I stayed away from all of those stupid boob threads so didn't realize the drama that was going on.

 Ok, with all this explained... I say I have to agree with the boot (unfortunate as that is)... After all, I may have faced the same boot when I was anti-anything L%B threads... However, I feel that I tread the line good enough to avoid that outcome. But we (all of us) finally got rid of LAB (except for bvb's incarnations, lol) and the place is better for it. I feel I played a very small part in this.

But more to the point, t*r was/is an alright lady. Maybe overreacted and maybe was a little too sensitive to the subject matter and maybe handled her outrage ineffectually/inefficiently. My take is if its too offensive, move to a different thread... there are 20 on the front page and masses more behind to choose from... or better... start your own?


As to my quote... I too did not spend too much time in the boobs thread, (but secretly trolled it for visuals occassionally) and totally missed the nuking...

Hopefully lessons are learned.

Cheers
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jan 23, 2013 - 03:20pm PT
18 is an arbitrary age.

huh?

you might be arguing a moral issue but the fact that most are going after IHP because of a legal issue suggests otherwise. 18 is not an arbitrary issue in a court of law with respect to the accusations flying around.
atchafalaya

Boulder climber
Jan 23, 2013 - 04:43pm PT
I don't know if IHP posted child porn. And thats the point I was trying to make. I don't like wondering if I am looking at underage kids when he posts his underage fetish bullshit on supertopo.

Take an innocent thread like Anastasias, with grown adult titays tastefully and not tastefully presented, and its all good. But then you got to IHP's fetish shots and instantly feel like I should maybe report the photos to the feds, wondering if those are underage kids. I get it, he likes to jerk off to young girls, but wtf, leave me/us out of it.
Ihateplastic

Trad climber
It ain't El Cap, Oregon
Jan 23, 2013 - 04:48pm PT


Weeeeee!
Alexey

Trad climber
San Jose, CA
Jan 23, 2013 - 05:18pm PT
"beevee" = LEB, the luser
True or not, but first post posters (you) have zero cred.
I know beevee as my climbing partner for many years. She is long time ST lurker, and have nothing to do with LEB.
Papillon Rendre

Social climber
Jan 23, 2013 - 05:25pm PT
TR was the OP of one great thread: "What song are you listening to now", great cornucopia of music and void of argument. Considering it has over 12K posts, and no discourse, bravo!

Thank you, TR!

Messages 101 - 120 of total 169 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta