Traverse from South to North 5.7

 
  • Currently 5.0/5
Search
Go

Matthes Crest


Tuolumne Meadows, California USA


Trip Report
Matthes Crest - S-N Traverse (III, 5.7) and Full Traverse (IV, 5.8) (Photo TR)
Tuesday July 24, 2012 10:15pm
Matthes Crest is pure Type 1 fun and a must-do for anyone climbing in the Sierra. The northern section is even better than the more popular southern section, although it is much more serious climbing and only appropriate for strong 5.8 leaders. This applies to both climbers as the climbing is often as serious for the follower as the leader.

Sean leading on the Wave. The crux is the downclimb off of the wave, a...
Sean leading on the Wave. The crux is the downclimb off of the wave, and it is intimidating for the follower!
Credit: PellucidWombat

In 2010 I did the standard S-N Traverse as one of my first III, 5.7 climbs. In 2011 I returned and did the full traverse as my first Grade IV climb. Both trips were incredibly fun outings on perfect rock and under perfect weather conditions, and between the two trips I pretty well captured the experience of the ridge. For those that like surprises, beware the beta dump, but for the rest, enjoy the long photo trip report!


Matthes Crest Headwall, based on the two different ways I have climbed it


Matthes Crest seen from Tenaya Peak


Matthes Crest South Ridge seen from Tenaya Peak


Matthes Crest North Ridge seen from Tenaya Peak




Matthes Crest, South to North Traverse (III, 5.7)
September 4, 2010
Picasa Album

I did this climb with Edward Lau, who I was introduced to via my friends Daniel Honneger & Mike Shen. It was yet another one of those climbs where I drove overnight and started hiking without sleep! Needless to say, I slept well this night.


Tresidder Peak ridge


Cathedral Peak on the approach

Despite carrying the rope and rack, I kept finding myself ahead of Eddy, so I entertained myself taking pictures of the foliage.


Corn Lilies


More Corn Lilies


Even More Corn Lilies


Ever More Corn Lilies


Fire!


More foliage


South section of Matthes Crest


North section of Matthes Crest

At last we were at the base of Matthes Crest, and we scrambled up the chute to the saddle in the ridge before the main headwall.


Matthes Crest


Echo Peaks


Echo Ridge


Matthes Crest


Fin at the start of the crest


Flowers


Flowers


View from the start

The headwall isn't too hard, but it is very steep. We pitched out the standard SuperTopo line for 3 pitches before we felt comfortable simul-climbing.


Edward leading the first pitch of the headwall. Note the other climber to the left. Another team later climbed in parallel to the right, so there are many ways to go here!


Looking back at the start of the simul-climb


Me climbing a fin unnecessarily. (by Edward Lau)


Looking South

While the climbing was very easy and the rock was amazingly solid and clean, the route is very exposed, and we didn't know when it might get more difficult, so we decided to simul-climb instead of roping up. I used running natural pro and as a result managed to cover the 1/3 mile section of ridge with the set & a half of cams and nuts that I brought, using most of the gear on the 5.2 downclimb to protect Eddy for following. Interestingly, because we were less timid simul-climbing than soloing, we caught up to some soloists, and mostly kept up with them throughout the route.


Bradley & Stefan on the ridge. They were a separate party that we kept running into on the ridge.


Looking back on the crest


Me nearing the fun Fin. (by Edward Lau)


Bradley & Stefan on the Fin.


The Fin. Definitely the highlight of the south ridge traverse.


Climbing the Fin. Supertopo says to go left of the ridge here, but that's not as fun. (by Edward Lau)

The fin was really fun. There was no pro, and the fin was very narrow (about as wide as a chair or less), but there were lots of feature to grab and edge on, and it reclined at a nice 45-50 degree angle. Falling would be serious even with a rope, but you could remain secure, and it was thrilling to be on such a long, narrow spine of rock! Although the SuperTopo topo shows a 5.6 traverse to the left of the fin, I don't see why anyone would take that way if they new about this!


The Fin


Extreme exposure


Continuing north, the difficulty eases but stays harder than earlier in the ridge, perhaps around cl. 4


Wee!


Echo Peaks & Matthes Crest dotted with climbers. One is on the summit of Matthes Crest.


Is this knife-edged enough? Eddy is following on exposed but very easy terrain.


Eddy on the rock playground


At the notch after the 5.2 downclimb, just before the crux 5.7 pitch to gain the N summit.

The downclimb gets a lot more exposed and a bit tricky, so the follower might want more protection here than elsewhere on the ridge. There are few features to drape the rope around, so save some cams for protecting the follower on this section.

The ledge at the notch is a very comfy place to take a lunch break.


Echo Peaks


The 5.7 crux pitch. It sure felt harder to me! It takes the thin finger crack on the wall. An awkward 5.8 variation ascends the corner and is better protected

I didn't care too much for the 5.7 pitch. It was very thin and balancy, with thin pro at your feet. It seemed like if you fell you would likely hit the ledge beneath (actually, on the next visit, a guy took a fall here, his last nut popped, and he hit the ledge before the next piece engaged. Fortunately it was mostly his pride that was hurt, and we belayed his party up after us).

Perhaps part of that feeling was because I was climbing with a pack on, and this pitch is made a LOT harder with weight pulling you out from the wall. I found it much more doable after I ditched the pack (note that the rappels take you by the ledge beneath this section, so you can leave your pack there if you're not continuing to the N Ridge).


Matthes Crest S-N Traverse


North Ridge of Matthes Crest

Most people only traverse to the summit, and then descend via two 50m rappels. This is an expedient way off, but it misses out on the best part of the crest! The next year, after I had gotten stronger at leading, I returned to attempt the northern section.


Matthes Crest, Full Traverse (IV, 5.8)
August 28, 2011
Picasa Album

Chris Terry and I set out to do the full traverse of Matthes Crest. I did the S-N traverse to the summit last year with the standard 5.7 finish and it was a spectacular climb with a lot of fun scrambling & simul-climbing. The northern section turned out to be far better & a more serious challenge.

This year with a faster partner we made shorter work of the standard traverse (not including delays from the crowds) and I finished with the awkward, burly & wide 5.8 crack variation. We continued north and completed the northern section just as the sun set. This section is much more technical (we pitched out 7 pitches) with many of the cruxes encountered as downclimbs with runout pro. The rock was perfect and the climbing was some of the best and most interesting that I have ever done!


Looking back on the standard S-N section (III, 5.7). This is on the easy simul-climbing section that lasts for one-third of a mile.

This time I opted to climb the headwall taking a nice looking line to the right to avoid waiting on a party that was currently on P2-P3. This deviation was very nice, as it allowed us to reach good terrain for a nice belay and simul-climbing a pitch earlier, and making the climb faster.


Looking ahead on the standard S-N section on the easy simul-climbing section. The summit is on the far right and the Canadians (blue, distant) are at the 5.6 crux of the traverse between the headwall & summit pitches. They took the SuperTopo way left while I passed them running right up the Fin!

It was looking to be a crowded day on Matthes as after we passed one party, we could see several more ahead of us. As we neared the 'Fin', I was surprised to find that the next two climbers ahead were my friends Sean Hermany and David Crockett. They also had intentions of doing the full traverse, so it looked like we would have company along that stretch. They were taking a break while a team of Canadians ahead finished belaying through the 5.6 bypass. Since the 'Fin' was clear and wouldn't interrupt that pitch, we ran ahead and passed the Canadians. They were part of a larger group, and there were two more teams ahead . . .


Chris Terry downclimbing a cl. 4 chimney as we passed the second group of Canadians.

Fortunately Canadians are nice and there was plenty of room for friendly passing. In the end we all collected on the ledge beneath the crux pitch. Chris and I ate lunch while one team started up the 5.7. I had intentions of trying out the awkward 5.8 variation. A climber was on the delicate crux when he took a fall, his top piece, a nut, popped, and despite a cam holding a few feet lower, he hit the large ledge. Fortunately only his pride was injured, although his nerves were shaken enough that he was happy for us to trail a line so that he wouldn't have to make another lead attempt on that pitch.

The 5.8 is burly and awkward, but not too bad and it is an interesting variation. I think it protects better and more safely at least, and I had a much easier time leading it with a pack on.


Crowded day on the summit. 5 on it now, & another 2 are close behind! I'm starting onto the northern section of the ridge.

Sean and David reached the summit just as I took off. We needed to keep our place out in front!


First anchor, with old crappy bolt & old but better Knife Blade piton.

I downclimbed a few steps, and stopped to make an anchor a little more than 30m out. It was a bit short, but there was a nice stance with a sketch bolt and bomber piton, and it looked like the terrain became serious for a ways after. I backed up the piton easily with a gear anchor and belayed Chris in.


Looking back up P1 of the N section.

We knew the next pitch would be the crux, but little more beyond that. I downclimbed, attempting to balance placing gear for Chris and saving gear for the crux and not running out prematurely. The climbing went down a steep, sloping ramp that seemed to want to dump you off the ridge. It made things feel much less secure than one would expect!


Looking down the steep & exposed crux pitch (P2) of the northern section. 3 soloists are running ahead. In white above is Stefan, who I met on the S-N traverse last year. This year he is climbing the N Ridge N to S

3 other soloist had caught up to us at this point, and we happily let them pass. They slithered down the rock with no prolbems.


Heading north on the ridge just at the crux, midway through P2.

After the awkward sloping ramp, I came into a knife-edge part of the ridge in a notch. I stemmed between two flakes and downclimbed the gap between the two. I think I encountered the free crux just below this, but I felt the free crux was easier than the ramp & gap as it was much more secure and less awkward. I went down until I reached a good ledge system to traverse on to reach a very interesting series of free-standing flakes, where I set up a belay.

We had watched another set of climbers coming towards us on the North Ridge, rising into sight and falling into hiding as they wound their way up, down, and around the multitude of Stegosaurus features. We met at my belay and I was surprised to see the climbers were Stefan and Bradley, the two climbers I met on the standard Matthes traverse last year!

Unfortunately I had over conserved on pieces on the downclimb, and Chris was not happy with some of my gear spacing on the downclimbing even though I attempted to sew it up more for her around the hard parts. My bad . . .


The 'Happy Flake'. I placed a #1 C3 at the top of the crack, then went 20-30 ft or so to my next piece of pro, hand traversing, straddling, & stemming across wild flakes!

The next sections was for me the highlight of the North Ridge. The climbing wasn't as hard as P2, but it was really cool climbing! Also, if it were much harder than I probably wouldn't have enjoyed it as much as pro is very sparse and a fall would be very bad for leader and follower here.

We had no idea what we were getting into for routefinding and had hoped to simul climb again on the North Ridge. Climbing stayed hard and exposed enough that we ended up belaying the entire ridge in about 7 pitches, although they went relatively fast due to easier climbing and some natural running pro.


Looking back on the 'Happy Flake' as I'm stemming to the next flake. I placed a #1 C3 about 15-20 ft back, and there is no pro in sight! Hand traversing, straddling, & stemming across wild flakes!


Looking back on the 'Happy Flake' from my 2nd piece of pro on the pitch beyond the second flake. I placed a #1 3CU about 20-30 ft back & here I got in a small nut. Hand traversing, straddling, & stemming across wild flakes! The drape in the rope is not from pro but from the rope caught on a granite node.


Sean Hermany about to down-follow the crux 5.8 2nd pitch.

Sean and David started down after us, roped up at this point. It was almost comical seeing the gridlock develop on the crux pitch as David and Sean tried to climb down it as Stefan and Bradley were trying to climb up! Fortunately in the end they found a way around each other.


Gridlock on Matthes Crest! Looking back on P2 & 3 from the belay. 2 teams of climbers are passing each other on the 5.8 crux 2nd pitch & Chris is about to climb towards me on the 'Happy Flake' that the rope is draped over.


Looking back on P2 & 3 from the belay. 2 teams of climbers are passing each other on the 5.8 crux 2nd pitch & Chris is about to climb towards me on the 'Happy Flake' that the rope is draped over.


Chris riding the "Happy Flake".


Chris riding the 'Happy Flake' on the really fun 3rd pitch.


Chris beginning the tenuous downclimb exit from the 'Happy Flake' to the next flake. Next to turn around, stem, and climb onto the next flake! Distance to the next piece of pro made this rather thrilling.


Chris relaxing on 'Buddha Flake'?

Since Chris wasn't please with my pro placement on P2, and was itching to lead more as the terrain eased, we agreed that she would lead the remainder of the pitches, leaving me at her pro-placing mercy >:-)


Looking north from P3 belay. The climbing difficulty eases up a bit but is still pretty sustained & with tricky routefinding.


Chris leading out on P4. Between us is an interesting 5.6-5.7 wide crack downclimbing problem and some airy step-across moves to the notch she has just passed.


Sean starting P4. The route drops down and onto the left side of the crest here. Exposed!


Looking back on P4. Sean is starting one of the memorable face downclimbs.


Chris belaying at the end of P5. The dark rock to the left of her is "The Wave".


David approaching me on P5.

Apart from the 5.8 downclimbing crux, the only other specific detail I had heard about the North Ridge was a feature called "The Wave". We had wondered when we would encounter it, and we reached it near the end of the climb. Somehow it looked much more frightening in the photos I had seen before.


Chris launching off on "The Wave" on P6.


You do have to go a ways between pro, but the top of the wave isn't too steep, and there are lots of knobs that made for secure footing.


Rippled surface on "The Wave". No pro for a while but the climbing was easy & secure.

There is a nice piton halfway along The Wave, but it is in the flakes projecting off of the crest, pointing away from the climber and out of view, so you have to search over the edge for it as you go along.


Old piton halfway along "The Wave", the only pro on this section before the downclimb off of it.

Surprisingly the crux of The Wave was the downclimb off of it (somewhat in keeping with the rest of the route). Chris found a blind pro placement around the edge partway down, but downclimbing to it was intimidating! I would definitely say that the North Ridge is easier to climb going N to S than S to N as all of the cruxes seemed to be downclimbs.


Looking back on "The Wave" on P6.

After the wave the climbing becomes cl. 4 to low 5th at most so it seems like a natural place to unrope or simul.


Chris belaying me at the end of P6. One more pitch to go to exit! We simul-climbed further hoping to go over the gendarmes but ran out of daylight and descended ca. P8.

Most climbers skip the last two gendarmes on the ridge as they begin or end the route, as you can access the ridge via some class 4 slabs. We were having so much fun we decided to climb on, staying near the crest, intending to go over the gendarmes and walk off onto Echo Ridge.


P7, where many people drop off the ridge. Still some fun climbing ahead though . . .


Looking back on "The Wave"


Sean climbing "The Wave". A blind piece placement in the mid-depth crack protects the downclimb, but it is still intimidating!


Sean finished with the downclimb & doing the tenuous step-over to exit "The Wave" & finish P6


Chris simul-leading out on P8ish. I think we don't have time for the gendarmes. Mt Conness is in the distance.

Unfortunately it was getting late in the day and we had a long ways to go out, so in the end we stopped short of the gendarmes and downclimbed class 4 slabs a pitch further than where Sean and David descended.


Looking back on the N section of Matthes. This is where climbers usually start or end the climb (depending on which way they're heading).


Looking back on the N section of Matthes. This is where climbers usually start or end the climb.

Since we finished the climb around the same time, Chris, Sean, Dave and I had a nice hike out together in the dark via Budd Lake. Trying to find our way around the Echo Peaks in the dark we only got lost 3 or 4 times . . .

Note: "The Fin", "Happy Flake" and "Buddha Flake" are all names I have whimsically given to these features since I haven't seen them called anything else. "The Wave" name is more 'official'.

  Trip Report Views: 6,038
PellucidWombat
About the Author
PellucidWombat is a mountain climber from Berkeley, CA.

Comments
Did you like this Trip Report? Got something to say? Don't hold back...
Comment on this Trip Report
monolith

climber
SF bay area
  Jul 24, 2012 - 10:42pm PT
Nice to see so many pics of the north section.
The user formerly known as stzzo

climber
Sneaking up behind you
  Jul 24, 2012 - 10:55pm PT
Cool! I like seeing all the pics!
TMJesse

Mountain climber
Olympia, WA
  Jul 24, 2012 - 11:20pm PT
Any TR with Matthes Crest is a good one to check out. This one is flat out exceptional. What an awesome place. Many thanks! But, sorry to see the corn lilies wilting so early this year.
this just in

climber
north fork
  Jul 24, 2012 - 11:33pm PT
Those are some killer photos. Really nice, thanks.
Grampa

climber
from SoCal
  Jul 24, 2012 - 11:51pm PT
Excellent TR. Looks like epic fun with great views, unique terrain and historic anchors.
hamik

Mountain climber
Pasadena, CA
  Jul 24, 2012 - 11:54pm PT
Hey, the north part of the ridge DOES look cool! I think I'll go do it when I'm back in CA. Nice annotations and pics, as always, Mark!
Zander

climber
  Jul 24, 2012 - 11:57pm PT
Great Tr, Lovely pics. Not just one or two either. A lot of great pics.
Thanks,
Z
climbingbuzz

Trad climber
SF, CA
  Jul 27, 2012 - 11:34pm PT
Magical.
I especially liked the pictures of the flora.
Yes, the rock is beautiful and amazing there, but there is something more to that area that I have trouble describing but you helped capture.
Thanks.

P.S. Don't most people just walk off the N end of the crest? I thought the last bit was some of the best. I have a distinct memory of the wave ending and wishing for more as I walked off the end. It has been a while though.
Some Random Guy

climber
  Jul 25, 2012 - 12:21am PT
that is some sexy rock!
10b4me

climber
  Jul 25, 2012 - 12:53am PT
thanks again for the tr. always very good.
phylp

Trad climber
Upland, CA
  Jul 25, 2012 - 07:43am PT
That's great, Mark! The photos are wonderful.
RP3

Big Wall climber
Twain Harte
  Jul 25, 2012 - 07:46am PT
DUDE! You may get the award for most psyched/"gettin-after-it" ST poster of the year!

Thanks!
Les

Trad climber
Bahston
  Jul 25, 2012 - 10:56am PT
oh man, have wanted to get on this for a while, and this TR is just what I needed to really seal the deal! Sierra next summer for sure! Great pics!
nutjob

Sport climber
Almost to Hollywood, Baby!
  Jul 25, 2012 - 01:21pm PT
That's more pics than I've seen of Matthes Crest before. Brings up nice memories! Thanks for sharing.
The Alpine

climber
  Jul 25, 2012 - 01:28pm PT
Awesome! Thanks for the tr. I still have no idea why the super topo says to bail at the north summit. WORST BETA EVER
Ezra Ellis

Trad climber
North wet, and Da souf
  Jul 25, 2012 - 08:02pm PT
FRIGGIN STELLAR TR!

thanks!
Cooker

Trad climber
LA, CA
  Jul 25, 2012 - 11:30pm PT
excellent trip report and awesome photos.

Do you wish you had climbed it N to S? If you go back would you do it N to S?

Has anybody done the route both ways? What's your preference?
lars johansen

Trad climber
West Marin, CA
  Jul 25, 2012 - 11:40pm PT
Choice TR! I did the full S/N traverse with Steve Bosque in 82'. We actually bivied on it. Well documented.

Best

lars
westhegimp

Social climber
granada hills
  Jul 26, 2012 - 12:13am PT
Cool TR man. Congrats. Thanks.

Wes
the goat

climber
north central WA
  Jul 26, 2012 - 02:10am PT
Inspiring TR, thanks PW!
PellucidWombat

Mountain climber
Berkeley, CA
Author's Reply  Jul 26, 2012 - 03:25pm PT
Thanks everyone! I'm glad ya'all enjoyed the pic extravaganza. I didn't write TRs at the time of the climbs as this is such a commonly done route, but then I thought about the lack of photos in most peoples' TRs, - especially on the North Ridge.

@ del cross - The Echo Peaks are on my 'to-do' list (on the Cathedral Traverse), so I hadn't had a chance to confirm by best matching from Secor & SummitPost sources. As I look closer I can see that pyramid being more of an independent summit than that red bump, so I've changed the graphic. Silly bumps, indeed, but I also have this silly twitch about making things as accurate as possible!

Who numbered them?

Based on the sequence, someone with dice or a dart board? ;-)

@TMJesse - Don't worry! These are old climbs. Both were done in late August/early September. I sure hope the lilies look better right now!

@ climbingbuzz - most people only climb to the high point with the register, and then they rappel off the ridge. From what I've learned, even those who do the N section usually skip the 2 northernmost gendarmes.

@RP3 - I stayed in town last weekend, car shopping. Having a weekend off left me with too much time for TR temptations :-)

@TheAlpine - I agree! Although I think many people who climb Matthes would be ill-suited to continue beyond the summit. That ridge gets serious, even with a rope.

@Cooker - My friend Stefan has climbed the entire ridge S to N and the North Ridge N to S (I don't think he continued south like he had originally planned). He thought the N Ridge was much easier to climb going N to S. I would assume the same could be said for the southern section, though I bet most would then rappel the crux pitch to the notch and maybe even the headwall. Going S to N it really isn't very feasible doing any rappels, so it keeps you free climbing :-) Since a lot of the fun on the N Ridge was the 'mystery' in what lies ahead (since you could never see the full pitch very well going down) and being forced to constantly look at the exposure, I suspect that it isn't as memorable going N to S, but certainly easier. I am tempted to try it in the reverse direction someday, just for comparison . . .
snowhazed

Trad climber
Oaksterdam, CA
  Jul 26, 2012 - 04:47pm PT
Word!

The last several times I've been on it solo- and I downclimb the handcrack prior to the 'happy flake' and skirt around those. I snapped a knobby foothold on Happy while soloing the first time.

Either way- that's definitely the free crux- the sloping ramp before is chill if you're down with handjams.

TFPU
Grippa

Trad climber
Salt Lake City, UT
  Jul 26, 2012 - 07:04pm PT
Great TR pellucid! One of my favorite days in the Tuolumne was climbing the Matthes Crest. A day full of engaged, but easy climbing. Moving in the mountains is so sweet!
perswig

climber
  Jul 26, 2012 - 07:48pm PT
Holy pics!
Really nice color and attention to detail. I especially like the corn lilies.

Thanks for posting.
Dale
Michael Nicholson

Big Wall climber
Thousand Oaks
  Jul 29, 2012 - 05:10pm PT
Great photos! I have to do this now it looks Classic
TripCheq

Mountain climber
Pennsylvania
  Jul 31, 2012 - 12:34pm PT
Great TR. My brother and I did part of the Cathedral Traverse last Tuesday (windy). From atop Echo Ridge we got a great view of Matthes. Your photos really bring out the detail of the route. Thanks!
Seamstress

Trad climber
Yacolt, WA
  Jul 31, 2012 - 12:49pm PT
I am not a fan of traverses, but I am eager to make this an exception. Can't wait!! Thanks for feeding the flame.
dirt claud

Social climber
san diego,ca
  Jul 31, 2012 - 01:48pm PT
great TR, thanks for the pics, awesome stuff, will have to get on that one of these days.
tilljo

climber
Oakhurst
  Sep 30, 2012 - 11:58pm PT
Great trip report! Thanks for all the awesome photos! I just did Matthes crest today for the first time and loved it! Your pics really helped in my preparation.

One question: How difficult are the final 2 gedarmes? We skipped them because we weren't sure if you could climb down them safely (specifically the 2nd to last...)

Thanks!
LuckyNeck

Trad climber
the basement of Lou's Tavern
  Oct 1, 2012 - 01:03am PT
NICE! When i go climb this thing, this is all the beta all ever need im sure!
Bascuela

Trad climber
Fresno, CA
  Oct 1, 2012 - 06:38pm PT
Your TR are always a pleasure to read & look at. Keep it up man!
PellucidWombat

Mountain climber
Berkeley, CA
Author's Reply  Oct 2, 2012 - 03:01am PT
tilljo: One question: How difficult are the final 2 gedarmes? We skipped them because we weren't sure if you could climb down them safely (specifically the 2nd to last...)

Do you mean the ones in the sunset photos, third to last? Sadly we ran out of daylight and didn't get to climb them. Still, I saw some ways that looked reasonable, maybe 5.7-5.8ish, but I'm just speculating there. I'd love to go back and try those out!
T H

Boulder climber
extraordinaire
  Oct 2, 2012 - 03:37am PT
So many sick-ass vetical cracks - and everybody is just traversing the ridge lol.
Dirka

Trad climber
Hustle City
  Oct 2, 2012 - 12:18pm PT
Pretty, amazing!
eKat

Trad climber
  Nov 11, 2013 - 07:48pm PT
BBST!

(As a reminder = BBST = donini for Bump for a Better SuperTopo)
Did you like this Trip Report? Got something to say? Don't hold back...
Comment on this Trip Report
Go
Matthes Crest - Traverse from South to North 5.7 - Tuolumne Meadows, California USA. Click to Enlarge
The Matthes Crest traverse starts at the south end (right) and follows the cockscomb north.
Photo: Greg Barnes
Other Routes on Matthes Crest
Matthes Crest - Anduril 5.10b R - Tuolumne Meadows, California USA. Click for details.
Anduril, 5.10b R
Matthes Crest
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Matthes Crest - Narsil 5.10c - Tuolumne Meadows, California USA. Click for details.
Narsil, 5.10c
Matthes Crest
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5