US national policy issues looming after healthcare?

Can't change history, but can try to learn from it. Aside from parties and candidates, what do you actually want? If more people were able to precisely articulate what policies they do want instead of focusing on the shortcomings of other parties or individuals, our democracy would be richer for it.

Trump appeared to have picked up on conservative commentary on Monday morning, noting that the London embassy had not had a full ambassador since January. On Twitter, he blamed Democrats in Congress for slowing the process.

“Dems are taking forever to approve my people, including ambassadors. They are nothing but OBSTRUCTIONISTS! Want approvals,” he tweeted.

However, although Trump announced on 19 January he had picked Woody Johnson, the owner of the New York Jets, to be the ambassador to the UK, Johnson has yet to be formally nominated to the Senate for confirmation.

So far, the Trump White House has made only 11 nominations for 188 ambassadorial posts. The state department is operating without much of its senior management because of a lack of nominations.

Once nominations are made, the Democrats would not be able to block them on their own; the Republicans have a slight majority, which is usually enough to confirm appointments.

to vote for an unelectably self-determined female, widely reviled candidate?

Well, hopefully. She'll be 74 next time around, but the woman is tenacious and seems to have a feeling of entitlement. Both the Clintons have carried victimization to stratospheric heights. It's never their fault.

One more inaccuracy. Although it's a public employee's fund, we paid a lot of money into it over the years, with the state chipping in as well. Most of that goes back into circulation in the state. It's a very good system, and I do not feel victimized like HRC, who you clearly adore.