Why U.S. Elected Representatives are wrong about everything.

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 101 - 120 of total 160 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Jul 30, 2014 - 03:28pm PT
In the case of welfare, I am FORCED to pay an arbitrary amount of money to people I would not otherwise be willing to support, and that payment provides neither protection of my inalienable rights nor produce a product I could not otherwise produce on my own and that directly benefits me.

Didn't Jesus say something about that?
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 30, 2014 - 03:32pm PT
You have a very strange definition of 'entitlements'.

You might feel that there are those who receive Welfare develop an inappropriate level of entitlement attitude towards it, but pretty much the rest of the world defines welfare as a 'Social Program'.

And you are pretty spiteful about it, too. I have known a number of people who are on welfare, and none of them wanted to start receiving it, and all of them did everything they could to get off of it, and back on their own feet, as soon as possible.

Of course, there are abuses....and you seem to have gained the view that all persons receiving welfare wish to do nothing more than suck on the gov't teat for the rest of their lives, and that we should not (as a country) do anything to help those in genuine need. Man, that's a negative view of the world.



madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jul 30, 2014 - 04:07pm PT
You have a very strange definition of 'entitlements'.

I thought that we got past that point already. I guess not. I guess you didn't read where I said, "... let's use the term 'welfare.'"

Or, you're just nit-picking as a tactic because you don't agree with me in general.

You might feel that there are those who receive Welfare develop an inappropriate level of entitlement attitude towards it, but pretty much the rest of the world defines welfare as a 'Social Program'.

Who cares what it's called. Regardless of what HighDesert says, huge numbers of people DO vote for it, and more and more of it. And the demoncrats DO base their entire existence on more and more "social programs" that are cried for by the masses, thus to ever-increase their voting base.

Majority faction is just about upon us.

And you are pretty spiteful about it, too.

You do not know that. I am very unhappy to see the greatest nation on Earth slowly pitch off the cliff in exactly the way that the founders hoped to avoid and that de Tocqueville predicted. But "spiteful?"

Why don't you quit analyzing ME and start systematically responding to arguments?

I have known a number of people who are on welfare, and none of them wanted to start receiving it, and all of them did everything they could to get off of it, and back on their own feet, as soon as possible.

Good for them. That says nothing whatsoever in response to my arguments about majority faction or the role of the federal government in FORCING taxpayers to distribute their property to those that have not earned it.

Of course, there are abuses....

Yes there are. And the fact that individual choice is taken out of the process of "helping" MEANS that it is no longer "helping." It is outright theft and forced redistribution.

and you seem to have gained the view that all persons receiving welfare wish to do nothing more than suck on the gov't teat for the rest of their lives, and that we should not (as a country) do anything to help those in genuine need.

Utterly irrelevant comments. (Oh, and inaccurate as well.)

How LONG they do it is irrelevant. What their attitude is in doing it is irrelevant. THAT they do it and the feds FORCE us to "help" them do it is the only thing that is relevant.

And the FACT is that they DO vote, and they DO vote across-the-board Democratic and in favor of yet more of the same. Oh, and there are growing numbers of them.

Man, that's a negative view of the world.

Utterly irrelevant. (Oh, and inaccurate as well.)
WBraun

climber
Jul 30, 2014 - 04:13pm PT
MB -- "I am very unhappy to see the greatest nation on Earth slowly pitch off the cliff in exactly
the way that the founders hoped to avoid and that de Tocqueville predicted."

Yep so true.

And then you have these stupid brainwashed idiot politards here babbling incessantly parroting MSM with no clue what's going on ......
crankster

Trad climber
Jul 30, 2014 - 04:47pm PT
And then you have these stupid brainwashed idiot politards here babbling incessantly parroting MSM with no clue what's going on ......

Hey, Spike, why don't you go bully folks on the "Mind" thread and leave us alone? And schedule a mental health appointment for your anger issues.
Wade Icey

Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
Jul 30, 2014 - 06:34pm PT
Werner-What is going on?
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Jul 30, 2014 - 06:57pm PT
The "entitlement" class lives on Wall Street, and you better believe it.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jul 30, 2014 - 07:22pm PT
Andddd... the puppet-masters win again: class warfare and class envy are alive and well.

We fight among ourselves and don't enact REAL campaign finance reform (we once had it, but the pricks undid it).

Throw every one of the incumbents out of office as a first step.

LOL... what am I thinking? It will never, ever happen.

We're doomed, and the SHTF scenario will be upon us, hopefully later than sooner.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 30, 2014 - 07:24pm PT
Man...what a miserable way to live your life.
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Jul 30, 2014 - 07:29pm PT
Andddd... the puppet-masters win again: class warfare and class envy are alive and well.

Very true.


“There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”

― Warren Buffett
crankster

Trad climber
Jul 30, 2014 - 07:37pm PT
Throw every one of the incumbents out of office as a first step.

This is lazy. There are plenty of good people in congress.

Who are you going to replace them with, anyway? Who are these Super Civilians?
Aren't they incumbents as soon as they take office?

If we lost all the tea party goons, that would be a start. Lois Lerner was right.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jul 30, 2014 - 08:14pm PT
There are plenty of good people in congress.

Oh, you must be referring to the ones that voted AGAINST the bill overturning the campaign finance limits that had been in place for decades, thereby opening the doors WIDE for the big-money (that only corporations can throw around) to flow in.

Those guys? Those are the "good people" you are referring to?

Then there is not a one "good person" in congress. Not one of them voted against it. They ALL want the big corporate dollars flowing in. Not a ONE actually cares to represent US against the corporations.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jul 30, 2014 - 08:20pm PT
climbski2

Mountain climber
Anchorage AK, Reno NV
Topic Author's Reply - Jul 30, 2014 - 11:32pm PT
Who are you going to replace them with, anyway? Who are these Super Civilians?

There are thousands of brilliant caring hardworking folks out there who could serve.

I could easily list people I would be proud to have represent our interests..

Some of them on st

JEleazarian for one. But not with the current system.. those who I would trust to send to Washington and be paid to work hard to find good solutions to our real world problems could not do that job in the system that exists

THIS IS THE KEY ISSUE .. How can we send the BEST people to Washington? How can we enable them to do the work that really needs doing?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jul 31, 2014 - 12:06pm PT
Thanks for the vote of confidence, climbski2, but flattery will get you nowhere!

;>)

John
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Jul 31, 2014 - 12:20pm PT
climbski2,

I agree with you, but the problem is the current system does not reward that kind of motivated, level headed thinking. Even if they got into office they would soon be dragged back down again.

We need to change the game so that creative solutions to problems and bi-partisan compromise aren't seen as a weakness. The fringe loonies have taken over the asylum and we can't seem to get it back.
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Jul 31, 2014 - 12:31pm PT
I'd vote for JE. We may not agree much politically, but we both want the same thing for the country.

Besides, it'd be nice to have someone who could play that big Steinway in the White House.

As for keeping the crooks out, Plato was right. Anyone who wants that power can't be trusted with it. So, we choose by lottery. Everyone has to enter the lottery. We'd have a more representative group in the legislature than what we have now, for sure.
John Duffield

Mountain climber
New York
Aug 3, 2014 - 06:01am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Aug 6, 2014 - 03:49pm PT
JElezaarian is my favorite economist....

Strongly disagree, DMT. The only source of monetary value is what you can exchange it for. Since I am required to pay my taxes in U.S. dollars, and I can be jailed if I don't, I can exchange U.S. dollars for my freedom which, to me, has value.

In addition, labor is simply one factor of production. You can't eat unless you harvest a crop, but you can't plant a crop unless you have seed for the crop, and unless you water it, and unless you have soil in which to plant it, etc. etc. In general, production requires varying amounts of the following (in alphabetical order):

1. Capital;

2. Entrepreneurial leadership;

3. Labor; and

4. Resources (some older texts lump all resources as "land").

Trying to say that any one factor of production is "primary" leads to the equivalent of proving the chicken came before the egg or vice versa.

Incidentally, the popular "Marxist" idea that labor is the sole source of value contradicts what Marx himself believed. He used a labor definition of value (thus, if have to work four hours to buy a suit, the suit is "worth" 4 hours to me. It didn't matter to Marx that it took ten minutes of labor in the factory to make it.

John


He offers irrefutable points on a regular basis. I totally subscribe to his theories, but sometimes he disassociates his from mine. Which is all fine. John is rock-solid on economics.

If you disagree with that, yer prolly a pinko.... (I said that because John won't).
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Aug 6, 2014 - 04:03pm PT
And this whole notion that the current House is wrong on everything, isn't that because you don't their stances on policy as a branch of gov't? Is this temper-tantrum time? The Dems held both Houses of Congress for 2 f*#king years, and probably passed the worst bill ever, the ACA. But that is debatable.

Point is, now the Repubs hold the House and you little brats are whining!~ This is the way our gov't works.

Sometimes, no bills are good bills. No more bullsh#t.

It's not the job of Congress to constantly legislate, but only when necessary, when there's a need.

There has been far too much pork and bullshit flowing through Congress. Also, ask yourselves why Harry Reid won't even allow votes in the Senate on certain bills.

To me, that rule should be repealed. Anything that passes the House should get a vote in the Senate.
Messages 101 - 120 of total 160 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta