Wolves! deja vu?

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 362 of total 362 in this topic
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Original Post - Nov 13, 2010 - 05:31pm PT
A friend from North Idaho sent me this link to the Bonner County Daily Bee
newspaper. Once again, the wolves are in the news, and raging "out of control."

http://www.bonnercountydailybee.com/news/local/article/78780c6c-ee2b-11df-001cc4c083286.html

I hope I didn't make a mistake in copying this long link.

Well it appears that the page isn't current anymore, but it can be found by using the newspapers search feature using the words wolves, and hunters.

The article is entitled "Duo Fends off Wolfpack."
Fritz

Trad climber
Hagerman, ID
Nov 13, 2010 - 05:43pm PT
Brokedown: Your link got me as far as the newspaper, but I then had to do a search. This link should be faster. http://www.bonnercountydailybee.com/news/local/article_78780c6c-ee2b-11df-8860-001cc4c03286.html

Seems like the hunters were very spooked by the whole thing. Mark me down as being on their side.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 13, 2010 - 05:52pm PT
I had the same problem, thanks Fritz.


Did those losers expect 'Dibs'?
stevep

Boulder climber
Salt Lake, UT
Nov 13, 2010 - 05:54pm PT
So the hunters killed something big. Left it for a day in wolf and grizz country, and then were surprised when one of the above critters wanted to keep the meat?

Duh.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 13, 2010 - 06:08pm PT
In today's world if it wasn't for human/human interaction, there wouldn't even be guns, as we know them.

Have you ever even seen the guns that olympic shooters use?
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 13, 2010 - 06:23pm PT
Of course not...

Where's Rox?
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 13, 2010 - 06:31pm PT
Thank Gawd,"boise"!
Ricky D

Trad climber
Sierra Westside
Nov 13, 2010 - 06:38pm PT
Think of the children!

We must do everything we can as a society to protect our precious selves from each and every threat that the world can produce. As the epitome of universal evolution, it is imperative that our genetic uniqueness be preserved at all costs.

I look forward to the day when even Band-Aids are no longer produced as the world will have been made so safe that not one child will suffer even the gentlest of paper cuts.

These aptly named "animals" have shown utter disregard for our wonderfulness and must be controlled.

I urge you to write your Democratic Congressperson immediately and demand that all creatures with any potential to bite, claw, scratch, infect or infest be banished from our sacred country.

Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 13, 2010 - 06:46pm PT
I dunno-the practice of killing an elk, moose, or other really big animal sometimes involves leaving it, or part of it overnight due to time-of-day considerations. If you haven't noticed, it's getting dark by 5:00 PM these days, and is doing so even earlier at the latitude of North idaho...

If you read the story carefully, the carcass/kill had not yet been "claimed" or otherwise "disturbed" by wolves. Yet! As usual, the horses gave the first warning that something was amiss. Packing the .44 Magnum was definitely all that saved both their a$$es. And, yeah, they (the hunters) were spooked--who wouldn't be? I'm sure the coyote was there for the offal and internal organs, not the bulk of the animal.
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 13, 2010 - 06:51pm PT
Wolves in Wyoming and this corner of ID have chased and snapped at cyclists. At least two wolves have been destroyed in WY for aggressive behavior toward riders.

I came down from the ivory towers of wolf fancy after the non native wolves destroyed the moose population in targhee creek a few miles above our family cabin... always carrying a big can of pepper spray. The girl I ride with carries a hangun with birdshot ammunition.

Interesting article here:

http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/general/columns/story?columnist=swan_james&id=5131109
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 13, 2010 - 06:56pm PT
Like, there's none of them going into the Elk refuge in Jackson this year? Give me a break.

When you're a suburban hunter and you leave a kill, you can't forget that you're on somebody else's turf. Shouldn't that be obvious? If it isn't, don't "hunt".
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 13, 2010 - 06:58pm PT
Reason I posted this: the states of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming are now in discussions of how they get the "new" wolf de-listed from the ESA. It is NOT the original native wolf, but a new and entirely different species!

I don't go outside and away from my pickup unarmed any longer. When I went up in the hills last Saturday to get a load of firewood along with a neighbor--we were both packing.
divad

Trad climber
wmass
Nov 13, 2010 - 06:59pm PT
We must do everything we can do as a society to protect our precious selfs from each and every threat that the world can produce.

First thing we gotta do is protect us from ourselves.
Ricky D

Trad climber
Sierra Westside
Nov 13, 2010 - 07:05pm PT
Ever wonder if our Great Grandparents would think we have turned into a nation of wimps and weenies?

My Great Grannie lived next to the swamps of what is now Hilton Head Island Resort. In her day, she never ventured outside without a sidearm - if not for the snakes, then for the occasional swamp cougar. Never heard her think twice about it.

Oo Oo - I moved to the Wild West and now I find that sharp-toothed things also live here. Can't we put them in a zoo or something because that furry beast made me spill my latte. That moose ate my petunias. That coyote munched my shi-zsu.

We are a nation of neutered pansies.

We deserve to be taken over by the Chinese.

John Wayne would cry.





Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 13, 2010 - 07:08pm PT
Like, there's none of them going into the Elk refuge in Jackson this year? Give me a break.

If you're refering to the moose...moose rarely go to the refuge. Most stay higher...they can travel in deep snow better than elk.

The elk in NE Idaho winter in Sand Creek and the Junipers, not Jackson Hole, the moose stay close to their summer range.

Maybe you were answering someone else' post. ??
Ricky D

Trad climber
Sierra Westside
Nov 13, 2010 - 07:10pm PT
I wonder if the hunters had scent-marked their kill with their mocha latte infused pee - if that would have deterred the beasts?

"Hey Romulus, this elk smells like Starbucks!"

"Don't touch it Remus, that belongs to the hairless ones".

Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 13, 2010 - 07:14pm PT
Broke, I'm from Wyoming. I'm on your side. I have a family just up the road from you, who live much of the time on fifty odd acres in the black hills, none of whom own guns. Can you really convince me, or anybody, that they need to "pack" to keep themselves safe from immigrant wolves? Aren't paranoid rednecks, and meth labs, the real, bigger, threat?

Jennie, oops, saw on rereading that you had switched to Moose, from
Elk, my bad. Still, it's a circle of life thing, check out the biome of the wolves and Moose on Isle Royal;http://www.isleroyalewolf.org/wolfhome/home.html
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 13, 2010 - 07:19pm PT
I also pack during hunting season, not to shoot any game, but to let any a$$hole shooting in my direction that there's "something out there that shoots back." We also have the occasional bear around here, like the one that went into my neighbor's shop building and scared the bejezus out of his 83 year old mother!
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 13, 2010 - 07:22pm PT
Ricky-

When I last pissed on an elk, it smelled like Maxwell House. That's all we had in the camper.... :>)

P.S. Starbucks hadn't been invented yet!
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 13, 2010 - 07:22pm PT
Thank you Broke, a few posts up.
Ricky D

Trad climber
Sierra Westside
Nov 13, 2010 - 07:45pm PT
Typically, or at least for the last 40 years of Mutual Of Omaha's Wild Kingdom, it was believed that any animal that attacked a human was the hapless victim of a mind altering disease or chronic illness or just sorely (and soon to be fatally) mistaken in their choice of meal.

All of the smart animals had learned that munching on Homo Sapiens was a No-No.

And for the most part, one could say that these former dreaded predators had stuck to the script and relegated their alpha hunter doings to the non-human part of the food chain.

Perhaps, one could suggest that "they" accepted "us" as more alpha than themselves.

Which leads to the suggestion that "they" no longer see us as alpha. Do these hunters sense a developing societal shift amongst the human herd that suggests a lessening of threat, a vulnerability in spirit, an opportunity to feed?

Are we becoming the hackneyed "weak, sick and feeble" that the nature shows tell us are the only ones that get eaten?

Has someone taught animals to read the Mayan Calendar and they just can't wait for another year?

One must often wonder...



Fritz

Trad climber
Hagerman, ID
Nov 13, 2010 - 08:30pm PT
RickyD: I will try to answer some of your question. I am only going to use Idaho history in my answer, but it might apply to the western US as well.

Which leads to the suggestion that "they" no longer see us as alpha. Do these hunters sense a developing societal shift amongst the human herd that suggests a lessening of threat, a vulnerability in spirit, an opportunity to feed?

Wolves, cougars, and to a lesser extent bears: were hunted nearly to extinction in Idaho.

I grew up with the mounted head of the "last wolf killed in Idaho" hanging on our basement wall. It had been killed in the 1920's and my grandfather bought the snarling head mount at an estate auction in the 1950's.

There was a bounty on cougars up until the 1950's in Idaho.

Grizzly bears were also extincted here.

Until I was in my 40's: the only black bears I saw in Idaho, were running away as hard as possible. When I was 11: I watched my mother make a great heart shot on one.

We ate it of course. Growing up as "Idaho trash" we hunted for food, not fun. I haven't hunted big game since college days----I was totally burned out on eating wild meat. (not to mention dealing with with converting a large mammal to small pieces of wrapped food.)

So---------much of that hunting predators to extinction crap stopped in the 1960's, although Idaho continues to have cougar and bear hunting by permit.

The bears and cougars, for the most part, lived in fear of humans--for a few more years.

By 20 years ago the cougars were on the rebound and black bears were a major problem.

As we know: the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service decided to introduce Canadian wolves. This was done in spite of evidence that Idaho had a small population of native wolves. (In the early 1980's a grad student in wildlife biology, at the U of Idaho, assured me that there was still a small wolf population in the Idaho Wilderness.)

We now have enough wolves and not nearly as many deer and elk.

Yep! Humans are slow, stupid, and taste yummy! (from the point of view of a wolf, cougar, or bear).


Volunteers are welcome, if you would like to help feed our predators.
Captain...or Skully

Big Wall climber
leading the away team, but not in a red shirt!
Nov 13, 2010 - 08:47pm PT
If a predator eats you, then you had it coming.
Ricky D

Trad climber
Sierra Westside
Nov 13, 2010 - 08:59pm PT
I wonder if there is some slow simmering animal plot developing against us humans.

If you look back over recent years, you will notice that prominent animal experts who spent years closely watching animals have recently been killed by the same. A couple that come to immediate mind without bothering to Google are Steve Irwin - poked by a sting ray and Tim Treadwell - eaten by his grizzly friends.

Why are the animals beginning to kill the watchers?

What do they not want us to see?

What are these fur covered terrorist trying to hide?

Beware - be very aware.
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Nov 13, 2010 - 11:04pm PT
I wonder if there is some slow simmering animal plot developing against us humans.

Forget wolves and cougars. It's the ants and termites that you should be having nightmares about.
tom woods

Gym climber
Bishop, CA
Nov 13, 2010 - 11:06pm PT
Tim Treadwell was a nutjob fore sure, but he wasn't killed by a Grizzly friend. The bear that got him, he didn't like, and apparently, the feeling was mutual.

Do we want the wolves, grizzlies, and lions around? Talk to your die hard wilderness fan in Yosemite. No one seriously considers bringing back the Grizzly, yet all want to "restore" the habitat.

On the other hand, lions are on the rebound. How much extra rebound do they get because there is no grizzly? Wolves are a subject of debate in California when it comes to how numerous they were, what if they came back? What would that do to the lion population?

How about the deer/elk population that we know and recognize is based on the absence of predators? Shouldn't the numbers drop as the number of predators increases?

The west has always been a tough place to make a living. Wolf numbers, sheep numbers, lion numbers, grizzly numbers, even trout numbers... the point is that these things are now our choice.

For better or worse, we control these numbers.

The question is what do we want?
tom woods

Gym climber
Bishop, CA
Nov 13, 2010 - 11:33pm PT
No, but one of my friends does research on the lions here on the Eastside. My information is based on drunken late night conversations, so take it for what it is.

They were having issues with lions taking too many sierra bighorns, which are in decline. It's a tough thing to try and balance, and what is that balance anyway?

My point is, we could eradicate the lions if we want to, or allow their numbers to grow. The situation is artificial in the big picture.

I'm not saying that's bad. I'm saying, we have a major say in what goes on out there in our "nature" here in the US.

Crowley- if you are interested, watch the video "counting sheep." I bet we could find it somewhere on netflix or you tube.
tom woods

Gym climber
Bishop, CA
Nov 13, 2010 - 11:36pm PT
Here's the trailer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBLkauM3UwE
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Nov 13, 2010 - 11:47pm PT
Wolf numbers, sheep numbers, lion numbers, grizzly numbers, even trout numbers... the point is that these things are now our choice.

For better or worse, we control these numbers.

The question is what do we want?

Check out the photos on this website if you have the stomach for it. Mutilated cows, dead guard dogs, a little lamb lying beside its mother who is lying in a pool of blood with her head torn off. Then ask yourself again, is this what you want?

http://www.idahoforwildlife.com/Website%20articles/Missoulianwolfad%20(3).pdf
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 14, 2010 - 12:00am PT
I'm pretty sure (by the news articles) that Montana will be the first/lone state to be void of Federal wolf "regulations"...


..time will tell, but wolves don't really have a place in the "wild" West anymore--their re-introduction has proved disastrous for livestock and ranching that are in the immediate area of Federal lands.

All the "enviros" that have never had to deal with dead livestock killed by wolves are sipping lattes and "preaching" to the rest on how much the wolf is needed in the modern ecosystem--meh!
tom woods

Gym climber
Bishop, CA
Nov 14, 2010 - 12:06am PT
Not that I'm a super wolf friend, but what is really wrong with dead livestock?

That's the end result for them anyway- tri-tip and other parts.

Back east, you know, where it rains and stuff, they can raise way more cows per acre than we can do in the west. If the feds pay for the dead calf, who cares if some go down to feed the wolves. It would have been buffalo back in the day, but those aren't around anymore.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 14, 2010 - 12:12am PT
Tom, a torn-apart Angus that has been left to rot never makes it market.


Crowley--why do you think that only sheep that are attacked?

Try living in wolf country and have that opinion...
pc

climber
Nov 14, 2010 - 12:12am PT
Jan,

It would be interesting to see an equally biased view of how the Idaho ranchers cause death and destruction. I find it unbelievably hypocritical to show a few cows and sheep mangled by an encounter with nature, when a million times that many cows, pigs, sheep, calfs, goats, chickens, etc etc are being slaughtered by these very ranchers for McFood.

Show me how much money they're losing and that these natural encounters are driving them out of business. That's the real "beef". Not some "clubbed seal wannabe photos" trying to grab some sympathy.

Rant off,
pc
Toker Villain

Big Wall climber
Toquerville, Utah
Nov 14, 2010 - 12:13am PT
Forget wolves and cougars. It's the ants and termites that you should be having nightmares about.


bingo
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 14, 2010 - 12:17am PT
pc, tell that to the rancher in Dillon, MT that lost 123 sheep in ONE night to wolves--you're point is moot.



edit: http://www.mtstandard.com/news/state-and-regional/article_27283168-eafa-11df-826a-001cc4c03286.html

MISSOULA - Montana's gray wolves already face opponents in federal court and Congress. Soon, the state Legislature may enter the fray as well.
State Sen. Joe Balyeat, R-Bozeman, plans to reintroduce a wolf management bill he fielded in 2009. It would declare that the United States government "lacks authority to impose wolves on Montana," cancel any existing partnership with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to manage wolves, and demand that "the United States agree in writing to unfettered state management of wolves with no further assertion of federal authority."
"The wolf issue is decided in court all the time anyway," Balyeat said in a telephone interview on Friday. "The animal rights people are taking it to court with the judge of their choosing and the issues of their choosing. We're giving away the home-court advantage. Why not do it on an issue of our choosing and a judge of our choosing? The state's rights issue is the most winnable issue we have on wolves."
*
In a nutshell, the bill claims Montana's right to manage wolves trumps the federal government's authority under the Endangered Species Act. Missoula firearms and hunting advocate Gary Marbut helped draft the legislation.
"It's still a 10th Amendment exercise to wrest control of wolves out of the hands of the federal government," Marbut said. "It has been the traditional function of state police power to manage and regulate wildlife within the state. Only in recent times has there been construed authority for the feds to manage wildlife. When the Endangered Species Act has been argued in court, the claim for authority the feds make is the commerce clause. But how many wild wolves have you seen sold across state lines? The answer is zero."
The commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress power to "regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several states." The 10th Amendment reserves to the states any powers "not delegated to the United States by the Constitution." Marbut believes wildlife management is one of the powers the Constitution left to the states.
*
Balyeat's bill made it to second reading in the 2009 Legislature before dying in a standing committee. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks legal counsel Bob Lane said he warned then the bill could have the opposite effect it intended.
"We'd make Wyoming look moderate, if not liberal, if that passed," Lane said from Helena. "That would have totally tied the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's hands in terms of ever qualifying Montana to manage wolves on its own. It was difficult for us to see any scenario where we would regain management authority until that bill was repealed."
Wyoming's Legislature passed a wolf management plan that made it a big-game animal in a small part of the state and a shoot-on-sight pest almost everywhere else. The plan was so different from those approved by Montana and Idaho that the Fish and Wildlife Service kept control over Wyoming's wolves when it delisted them in the other two states in 2009.
That division formed the heart of a lawsuit by 13 environmental groups that sued the federal government last year. They argued wolves can't be managed according to state boundaries. U.S. District Judge Don Molloy agreed and returned Montana and Idaho wolves to Endangered Species Act protection in August.
The states are challenging that ruling in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Meanwhile, several members of Congress have drafted bills to remove the wolf from federal oversight.
*
Balyeat's state bill has several other measures that raised eyebrows among constitutional experts. It would make anyone "responsible for inflicting wolves on Montana or preventing state management of wolves" liable for damages to anyone injured or killed by a wolf, including anyone "party to a lawsuit with the purpose of preventing or delaying the implementation of state management of wolves."
"It's overstepping the Legislature's authority to target a specific group, and it would fall flat under equal protection in a heartbeat," said Jack Tuholske, a visiting professor teaching constitutional law at the University of Montana. "It would also conflict with the First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievance. But that's why we have a court system in our constitutional democracy. Legislatures do foolish things and courts declare them unconstitutional. That's how the system works and it's been working pretty well for 230 years."
Marbut said the legislation followed other "loser pays" provisions.
"There are people who introduced wolves and prevented delisting, who have twisted the truth and fact in order to have their way with the people of Montana," Marbut said. "That bunch of people is complicit in damaging Montana's lifestyle and economy and culture. Those people who are responsible and complicit need to have some consequences."
The bill also includes consequences for wolves. It states if a person is injured or killed by a wolf, "the wolf or wolves involved in the attack are considered likely to be infected with rabies (and) any person may kill any wolf by any means within 100 miles of the alleged attack."
Mike Meloy, a Helena attorney specializing in constitutional law, said wording like that just weakens the bill.
"I don't think they have to engage in those kinds of fairy tales to permit somebody to shoot a wolf within 100 miles of a death," Meloy said. "I don't think they need to diagnose rabies. All they need to say is the Legislature controls how the wolf is hunted in Montana. The way it is, I don't understand how they could get to first base in court if someone decided to challenge it."
But getting to first base could be the least of the legislation's problems.
Ryan Benson, legal counsel for the multi-state Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife, said Congress is a faster way to reach a wolf solution.
"Going through the Legislature will essentially require some kind of a lawsuit, and that's kind of a long pass," Benson said. "If Congress says the wolf is delisted, it's effective immediately. And that could happen as soon as next year, where in a court case, you're looking at several years to get it through the system."

pc

climber
Nov 14, 2010 - 12:32am PT
Edejom, Your arguement is much better. That's a crazy number of sheep in a short amount of time and I imagine that would hit the bottom line. Though it sounds like the rancher/s in question had insurance.

I just don't like ranchers trying to play the sympathy card. Poor sheep and cows... That's pure hypocrisy.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 14, 2010 - 12:46am PT
No insurance--can't by purchased for "an act of God" intrusion.


The state and Fed offered up some chump change for each head--that would hardly cover replacing each one, let alone the time, energy, and dollars to raise them to adult status.

Granted, this case was extraordinary, but clearly not out of the realm of possibility when dealing with a killing machine animal...




I like looking at roaming lobos as much as the next person, but "regulating" and "controlling" them is simply preposterous. If they roam (which they do, up to 200 mi. per day) then they will kill, period, it is their purpose. Why can't non-wolf country folk see this?



edit: ...and they KILL the easiest, most convenient prey without prejudice or discretion.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 14, 2010 - 12:57am PT
Matt, I don't understand your question (what is loscust?) and how it pertains to this matter...


I'm no expert, and don't claim to be even close to one--I see the local stories on wolf kills, then relate how I would feel in that position.



Personally, I have seen wolves in the wild, and have a rancher friend/acquaintance that has killed 5 wolves (that I know of) whilst munching on Angus calves. The Fed authorities don't even ask him questions anymore, they just issue him a "kill on-sight" permit and tell him to call them when he kills one. (off the radar kind of stuff)



edit: BTW: my friend lives 40 North of YNP and lives in a valley that the Fed claimed was "wolf-free", that is until they were photographed and killed there.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 14, 2010 - 12:59am PT
where is rocjox? i bet he would be having a rabies, foaming at the mouth attack at this thread!

on a side note, i spend a great deal of time in the far back woods, not like a climbing area trail head and i have seen wolves and heard them in WA state. beautiful and gorgeous. but i was glad to have my .357 too.

frankly, the wolves do not need our protecting, they are very good at protecting themselves up here. on the other side i enjoy the fact they are here, but i dont rely on farm animals for my income so i can understand pissed off ranchers as well.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:01am PT
Your opinion, AC--I got no problem with that, for you don't live in wolf country and don't really matter in the scheme of things.





edit: Crowley--if the Fed introduced an endangered species of termites to your locale, and they ate your foundation, it would be hard to believe that YOU would not be seeking compensation.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:06am PT
In MY words, "You have no standing, just an opinion that is worth squat."
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:09am PT
Fair enough, since you asked:

http://www.mtstandard.com/news/local/article_ab2587fc-dbf7-11df-a1d0-001cc4c002e0.html

Feds shoot, kill wolves


Federal trappers shot and killed three wolves last week that had repeatedly killed sheep in the Blacktail Valley south of Dillon.
The wolves had killed four adult ewes over two days when they were spotted in the private pasture in the Rock Creek drainage, said Carolyn Sime, wolf program coordinator for the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Trappers from the air spotted four wolves and shot three black wolves before the fourth one, a gray wolf, escaped.
Sime said the wolves were responsible for an attack on sheep in June, when they killed five ewes and four lambs in
the area. She said the sheep rancher had taken steps to keep wolves away but the predators were persistent.
"This producer had stepped up efforts with dogs and herders," she said. "Despite all the non-lethal tools, the wolves figured this out and it wasn't going to stop."
Three ewes were killed and one was injured on the ranch on Oct. 7. Another attack occurred on Oct. 14, when one ewe was killed, and FWP authorized that any wolves seen in the pasture be killed.
The livestock attacks occurred on the property of Jon and Kathy Konen, who last year lost more than 120 sheep to wolves in a single attack. State officials later removed the entire Sage Creek pack after the attacks continued.
Wolves returned to the area within a year. Sime said the wolves were a new pack and not members of the Horn Mountain or Horse Creek packs that were living in the Gravelly Mountains. Both of those packs were killed by
federal trappers in the past year after repeated livestock attacks in the Madison Valley.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:14am PT
AC,

its hard for a city boy to unnerstand that some folks are still trying to "live off the land" so to speak. ranching, farming, etc.


if they were my sheep i would have gone wolf hunting and not told anyone, but there are "civilized" consequences for that type fo behaviour as well....
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:15am PT
Care for some Federal termite infestation in your house foundation?

After all, they're good for the environment and are natural predators.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:22am PT
ede, the one thing i will agree with RJ on is that peeps who see the hollywood sign everyday dont have a clue about natural selection or how some folks are trying to eek out a living raising sheep cattle etc.


the same farmers/ranchers who should be applauded by raising their stock in a great free roaming environment take it in the chops for not being able to protect their investment against predators.

but thats how some people want it. gives AC and others something to bitch about while they are busy stuck in the freeway traffic but espousing their knowledge of natural selection and other great topics they have no clue about..
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:33am PT
understood AC.

my grandparents were sheep herders and my dad was a vet.

they are not all lazy. just as you would not like to be robbed, some of the farmers/ranchers dont like their stock killed without having the abilitity to retaliate.

i have hunted/fished/climbed and taken care of sheep (not in the way locker might think!) for years and i can feel their frustation.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:36am PT
Wool growers, as you put them AC, account for only a percentage of the wolf kills.

If you've ever had Angus beef, then you'd certainly appreciate it that wolves didn't take away your dinner from you.



Where one lives currently is important, and if you don't have a chance to encounter predators when venturing out, then maybe you ought to.



edit: AC sir, just because you want a specific number to argue doesn't mean that my point (not opinion) is not valid--it just proves your ability to try to continue to argue a weak opinion. It's all good, at least in my area we only have to deal with 4-legged killers and not the bi-pedal ones:-)
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:43am PT
You know how to do a "search", Crowley.


Try the Montana Standard, Billings Gazette, Bozeman Daily Chronicle, the Helena Independent, or the Missoulian.



Pretty simple to get the numbers that YOU need--I really don't give a shite on the amount of compensation that the Federal government comes up with.




edit: honestly, AC--being old doesn't always make you wise, usually it just makes you old and out of touch
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:44am PT
i dunno guys.

what i do know is that this year alone i have seen and heard wolves while out in the woods. it's a pain in the ass for me to carry my lightweight 357 but sometimes i am glad to have it. even though most of the time the real reason for having it is cuz of some two legged as#@&%e and not a 4 legged predator. but the reality is that i will never really need it, kind of like the old leader must not fall strategy that we used to live by.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:45am PT
What "backpost" ?




edit: And precisely/exactly how are you "familiar" with this issue, sir Crowley--inquiring minds want to know...




Know some ranchers with killed livestock, been in the ranching game yourself, investigated wolf predation? AND how do you know more than any of us ('cept for telling us you do) ?

Certainly, an expert as yourself can quantify YOUR opinions.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:46am PT
AC,

you prolly need to try one of those sex sites to let of some steam. positive benefits for a a shady bizness...
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 14, 2010 - 02:20am PT
lol.

AC, wolves dont need much help. coyotes dont need much help.

the first wolves i saw were cubs. in WA, where they had never been reported near Mt. Adams in SE WA

they were in an active logging area. my first reaction was to report to the forest service that there was an endangered species in the logging area. then wisdom preavailed. hell, if a species can prevail in an area like that then they dont need a hell of a lot of protection.

there are less elk in MT near jellystone. man, unfortunately, seems to like screwing with nature whether it is killing wolves or reintroducing them. and man still has their collective head up their ass on how to do things right. would you trust your future on a government that can't balance their checkbook? let alone deciding who and what dies.
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 14, 2010 - 02:40am PT
Rokjox may have already posted some of these...showing severe declines in Idaho wildlife counts, in some wildlife mangement areas, since the introduction of the Mackenzie Valley subspecies of wolf. Such stats get wide circulation in Idaho newspapers.


Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 14, 2010 - 02:46am PT
i agree with your point jennie.

it is difficult to deduce the dwindling wildlife numbers while stuck in california traffic jams. i mean hey, if i were stuck in traffic i would want a wolf to cross the road too.

damn, where is RJ when you need him. guess his blather about "winning" "beating pate" etc. tired him out....i figured him more of a stayer but he is being a quitter here on his favorite topic!
edit:
i spend lots of time near the madison river, in mT. there are less elk recently. scientific observation over 25 years. the most elk i see are behind fences....
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Nov 14, 2010 - 04:08am PT
Tom and pc-

Agreed that slaughter houses are hideous places, but we do have laws governing how livestock can be killed, as well as government inspectors, and undercover humane society investigators to try to insure that the killing is as humane as possible.

If you had read the wolves and livestock article I posted you would have discovered that wolves don't just kill for food, but also maim and kill for sport. The ranchers weren't just distressed by the financial loss but also by coming upon livestock still alive and in agony because their legs had been chewed off or they had been disemboweled but were not yet dead. Not to mention the trained and cared for ranch dogs that have suffered the same fate.

If you don't care about the livestock at least have some compassion on the working dogs who gave their lives to protect the herds.

Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 14, 2010 - 07:56am PT
tell us how you really think reilly!

i would rather live in ID than CA any day. i am not fond of all the idjits you have. but i suppose that CA is rocjox free.....
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Nov 14, 2010 - 08:31am PT
Bison get the same reception, don't they? 60 million strong, the fertilizers of the great plains..self contained, doing their thing, until they got in the way of Manifest Destiny, that is. Like the indians, and like the wolves. One can only imagine what it all looked like before "progress". Damn our species is brutal.

"No beast so fierce but knows some touch of pity. But I know none, and therefore am no beast."

Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 14, 2010 - 09:02am PT
There's too much livestock as it is...
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Nov 14, 2010 - 09:05am PT
That's right, we've been sanctioned by GOD to use nature as we see fit. No living in balance with ecosystems, just pure domination fueled by that one enduring european trait that brings this country together: the acquisiton of wealth. God help it if anything stands in our way, two-legged or four-legged.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 10:19am PT
Wow! I see a lot of comment while I was sleeping last night.

A question was posed; How much does a rancher get reimbursed for the loss of...? I've lost calves that had, at birth, a cash value of $200.00, and never received a dime from G & F. The State Game and Fish have a "predation fund," that supposedly covers wolf, lion, and bear kills of domestic livestock; I think it's $10-20 for a lamb, and $50 for a calf; these figures are about 25% of the value of a live animal by todays valuations. Absurdly low, in other words. I don't even bother. There is such a bureaucratic hassle/process to go through that it isn't really worth the time involved.

For the rancher in Montana to lose 178 sheep in one night, that's disasterous! A full-grown ewe has a value of ~$100.00 and a lamb ready for slaughter is ~$50-70 depending on the market; do the math. It's at least a $9,000 loss in just one incident! I applaud Montana's State Senator for his stand, although I'm not sure the extended liability portion of the bill has any chance of enforcement.

As an edit, I changed one word above from "wildlife" to "domestic livestock," which was erronious in fact.
stevep

Boulder climber
Salt Lake, UT
Nov 14, 2010 - 10:23am PT
Somehow the wolves managed to live OK with deer, elk, moose and bison before white folks came along. And still do in parts of Alaska and Canada.

It's the cattle and sheep that are the real issue here, along with the hunters that want lots of easy to kill deer and elk.

You can post lots of charts showing decline of deer and elk since wolves were re-introduced, but those are kind of meaningless unless you also have those numbers from the 1600's when there were natural wolves in the environment and fewer white folks.

We can decide that we don't want wolves, and do want those other species, but let's not pretend that the wolves weren't there first.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 10:44am PT
To all the "environmentalists" postin here on the side of the wolves: I'm much more of a true environmentalist than you ever could conceive of being, 'cause I consider myself a true steward of the wildlife on my ranch. In the spring, I get to see the does with their new fawns (both species of deer--whitetail and mule, as well as pronghorn antelope) frequently cow elk with new calves, as well as all my new calves raised by me on the ranch. I take predation on all above very personally, and shoot coyotes or other predators ON SIGHT. Yes, this sometimes includes domestic dogs that city dwellers "drop off" out here to get rid of...

I allow hunting by very limited numbers of hunters in the fall, just to have some income; I no longer hunt personally. I hunted as a younger man strictly from economic necessity, to feed a wife and 2 young children. So...I live here alone on the ranch, feeding the wild turkeys every morning, keeping my eyes open for "intrusive species." Well. all you faux environmentalists, MATCH THAT.

I'm NOT atypical, by the way, as most other ranchers/neighbors feel the same way. (Yeah, they feed wildlife, too.)
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Nov 14, 2010 - 11:16am PT
Die hard hunter, not really an environmentalist. butcher my own game, work with birds of prey, dispatch what they catch with my own hands. brutal work, but it gets done. I've worked on dairy farms, castrated calves, shot car-hit whitetail deer, hunted them with bows and rifles. shot at wild dogs running sheep in west virginia when i've been there hunting. no sierra club bullshit here.
having worked with birds of prey, including stints at rehab centers, i've seen more than a few dead hawks, shot by farmers supposedly protecting their stock. the dreaded chicken hawk, which usually turns out to be a redtail that happened to be sitting in a tree at the wrong time when said marksman was about. They killed hawks by the thousands during their migration back in the day. they were vermin, according to the books. According to the mandates of an uneducated public that is. maybe the wolf doesnt have a place according to some, but don't tell me they weren't here, in the lower 48, in great numbers, before whitey came along.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 12:10pm PT
Rokjox-
Let's go import some Siberian Wolves for those beautiful parks in LA and SF! They can feast on the homeless living in cardboard boxes....

;)
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 12:23pm PT
Ahhhhh!

To quote Jack Lemmon in Grumpier Old Men, "Let the games begin!"

C'mon, RJ, your shot...
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 14, 2010 - 12:35pm PT
Give 'em enough rope...
drljefe

climber
El Presidio San Augustin del Tucson
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:10pm PT
Do you guys have PBS up there?

drljefe

climber
El Presidio San Augustin del Tucson
Nov 14, 2010 - 01:30pm PT
I wonder if the reintroduction of Pate to the ST habitat will have any parallels?
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 14, 2010 - 02:11pm PT
What Rox said, sis; republican need to control, issues....
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 03:00pm PT
Lois-

The problem is one of "the wolves don't give a $hit" about YOUR rights. They are not respecters of No Trespassing signs. They've come ON TO MY LAND and then KILLED MY ANIMALS! Yet current Federal Law prohibits me from killing them unless they are caught in the act of killing my livestock!
And if I do kill one, then I'm guilty 'till proved innocent, from their perspective.
LED

Social climber
the great beyond
Nov 14, 2010 - 03:06pm PT
LED

Social climber
the great beyond
Nov 14, 2010 - 03:24pm PT
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 03:27pm PT
Lois-

You need to get a solar charger for your electric fence. Better yet, replace it with what I use: good ol' fashioned barbed wire.


There are certain legalities here: Wyoming law states, if you don't want the neighbor's animals on your land, it's your responsibility to fence them out with a "legal fence" ( that's 4 strands of barbed wire, and posts 1 rod apart, 1 rod = 16.5 feet). That's why Wyoming is called a "fence-out" state. Other more civilized states back East are called "fence-in" states for obvious reasons. This is a holdover from the old days of the cattle barons and open range; an effort to get rid of the "sod busters."

Trust me on this one; I spend more time getting other people's cows off my place than they ever do on the reverse. There's an old saying: Good fences make good neighbors.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 03:34pm PT
AC-

It's hard to teach the dead to read...
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 03:44pm PT
AC-
Yes the "triple S" method is still practiced widely, yet today.
LED

Social climber
the great beyond
Nov 14, 2010 - 03:59pm PT
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 04:17pm PT
Lois-
You should be getting 50% of the hay he puts up; that's the standard deal across the west. You grow it on your land, he gets to keep half for cutting and baling.

You really dont want any wolves in Pennsylvania; the deer would soon be gone; your dogs would soon be gone; your kitty cats would soon be gone; your pesky neighbors would soon be gone; wolves can swim, and you'd be gone too.

By the way, I have to fence-in about 1,700 acres and maintain these fences against elk damage. Your place would only take about 16 rolls of barbed wire, plus posts and gates; a good fence crew could do that in about 2 days. Figure about $5K, with all the work done to a professional standard.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 04:56pm PT
AC-
Pretty misleading referring to the southern tier of elk habitat. Noticably absent the figures of NW Wyoming. Yes. I can have sometimes upwards of 650-700 elk on the ranch at various times. This is a huge increase in the SE Wyoming herd population of the Laramie range. Although I "feed" these elk, I don't really givva Schitt. In another year or 2, the Colorado and Montana figures will start reflecting the wolf predation.

Remember, this is from a fund raising effort, patting itself on the back...
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 05:33pm PT
Lois-
I do not, nor ever have had ANY issues with deer, antelope, or elk. They are part of the ranch life, as are the wild turkeys, Hungarian partridges, and sage grouse. I don't like ANY predators killing them. I really restrict hunting, as well. My cattle are my wife's "hobby" herd. I keep her favorites to enable myself to take pictures and send them to her in the nursing home. She has Huntington's Chorea, but is still capable of enjoying her animals in a vicarious manner.
Ricky D

Trad climber
Sierra Westside
Nov 14, 2010 - 06:49pm PT
I'll try to google it - but I recall a blip on a recent television documentary that suggested a hybrid wolf/coyote population is developing on the East Coast or such.

Something about the size and aggressiveness of wolves with the coloration and intelligence of a coyote.

Article here -

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=wylie-coywolf-the-coyote-wolf-hybri-2009-09-23
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 06:59pm PT
This is not the native Rocky Mountain Grey Wolf that was "reintroduced," but a Canadian species. Check out the earlier posts by Rokjox, and he has the data to back this up. Are you extraordinarily dense, or simply unable to read and comprehend?

The earlier screed about wolves being shy and reclusive is absolute fantasy writing. Written by some dewy-eyed wnd wishful thinking dreamer? Is a pack of feral dogs shy of humans? Multiply that by 2 orders of magnitude and you have Canadian pack wolves.

Added in edit: Nope; never did, nor ever would vote for Dubya.
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 14, 2010 - 07:14pm PT
Canis Lupus Occidentalis is the subspecies transplanted from western Canada to Yellowstone and into Idaho wilderness areas.Canis Lupus Baileyi is the smaller subspecies native to Rocky Moountain States.

Nowak, Ronald M. 1995. Another look at wolf taxonomy. In Carbyn, L. N., S. H. Fritts, and D. R. Seip. Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 07:30pm PT
Re: Wild turkeys. See the pix below.
I feed them up by my house in the driveway.


I really enjoy feeding these birds; costs me about $8-10 a day.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 14, 2010 - 07:45pm PT
The lack of natural predators and abundance of the goodie s(think of it as a smorgasboard) you grow on your farm, are why Bug's Buddies give you such a hard time, Lois. The system is out of balance (like it is everywhere). More large predators would be good for your plants.

Likewise, in general in the west and midwest there are too many wild hoofers. There are 'supposed' to be more large predators. Ask anybody who has hi say a deer, or an Elk with their car. I've hit both (one of the reasons I drive a Saab, one design parameter is that the animals fly over the top when hit at speed, designed with Swedish Moose in mind i'm told).

As for protecting whatever you want on your own land. That's fine as far as it goes. But in the west, the problem is generally the reverse; it takes a lot more land to feed a cow in the more arid lands of out here then it does in places with more rainfall. Most cattle are raised on public lands, and we all pay for this cow welfare. This is why cows run wild like the vermin they are, all over Vedauwoo, among other places.

Then cowherds welfare 'entitlees' want to control the predators on public lands they graze cattle on. Not to maintain ecological balance but to raise more cows, "wild" meat and trophies, than the land can realistically support.

On our dime!
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 08:19pm PT
To address several issues in one post!

Lois-
I simply put out the stuff called Kountry Buffet that I buy at the feed store. It's laced with molasses, so the birds smell it first, then they develop a taste for it. It's a ground and pelletized oats and barley feed, with some added whole corn. I dunno how it all started, but I've been feeding them during cold weather when there's snow on the ground for 5-7 years? They hang around all year, but aren't always seen; they also are my moving bug control system and eat huge quantities of grasshoppers from the hay meadows, as well as eating small rodents like mice. They also keep snakes under control. After a while, they got used to me and the feeding them became a real pleasure. I can get close enough that they bump my legs while I feed.The older hens know me and aren't afraid; the young of the year get the message quickly and follow the older birds. They are dam smart!

Jaybro-
I have an operation that has NO public land (Forest Service Grazing nor BLM Grazing leases). I own and pay $$$ in property taxes on over 1,600 acres of very prime grazing land. All DEEDED acreage!

Lois-
The elk are "transients" and only come down from the mountains in snowy and cold weather. I have year-round deer and pronghorn antelope on the place.
LED

Social climber
the great beyond
Nov 14, 2010 - 08:39pm PT
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 14, 2010 - 08:43pm PT
That's why I said "most", Broke. I wan't talking about your situation, just thought it relevent to mention a problem that is a lot bigger deal than whether there are wolves.
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 14, 2010 - 09:14pm PT
You’re correct Mr. Crowley Canis Lupus Baileyi is the Mexican Wolf. Canis Lupus Nubilus is the subspecies native to Idaho, Wyo. and sw Montana.

(From a post made on a previous thread; the Hall and Novak subspecies map together)

Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 14, 2010 - 09:20pm PT
Who cares about the darn wolves - talk about flogging a dead horse. What I want to know is if Jennie is Little Red Riding Hood?
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 14, 2010 - 09:20pm PT
Who cares about the darn wolves - talk about flogging a dead horse. What I want to know is if Jennie is Little Red Riding Hood?
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 14, 2010 - 09:38pm PT
Okay, Okay, Anders! You outed me...
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 14, 2010 - 09:41pm PT
Hey, Diode-

What's with the lady Gaga pictures?
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Nov 14, 2010 - 10:14pm PT
Fascinating read. This and the threads on the wild mustang problem out West really do seem like 19th century debates all over again.

There is also truth to what Jay says. I have always noted that people in the Rocky Mountain West hate the federal government at the same time they have their hands out for more subsidies. On the other hand, if the cattlemen, sheep owners and miners didn't pay to use those public lands, everyone's taxes would go up.

So here's the good news. At least with killer wolf packs roaming Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, the forests are not infested with illegal immigrants growing pot and polluting the streams with their pesticides as in California.
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 14, 2010 - 10:17pm PT
Plus it slows down all those icebacks from Canada.

My mother was a childrens' librarian and a big Red Riding Hood fan. She had a big collection of RRH books, costumes, and stuff, which we donated to UBC's special collections.
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Nov 14, 2010 - 11:46pm PT
No one understood ecology in the 19th century. They decimated the buffalo herds for profit but also because they could not carve up the grass lands into private farm land until the buffalo were gone. Now it turns out, much of the land in the Dakotas and Mountain states can not support farming because the climate is too dry and the aquifers are being drained. Farms in the Dakotas especially, are being abandoned at a rapid rate.

Some have even suggested the federal government buy up or reclaim the old homestead land and run buffalo on it again, with the Native Americans of the region as the stewards. The mustangs from Nevada could be trucked from the government feed lots there to the Dakotas as well, preferably after sterilizing most of them.

Meanwhile, livestock grazers eke out a living, often with the use of public land. If the public at some point decides to close that land, turn it over to the wolves and California tourists, and put all the former ranchers on welfare, that could happen. But really, is that the best use of the land? Or of human energy?

I must admit to being biased since all of my ancestors left the East Coast and pioneered the West working a couple of states westward each generation. I also have ancestors who pioneered the long horn cattle drives from south Texas to Dodge City. And I own mountain property in Colorado thanks to patented mining claims. I've heard these issues debated all my life.

The one thing that unites all the various interests in the mountain states however, as far as I can tell, is their contempt for the way the wolves were imposed on them by the federal government and sentimental folks who live in urban areas who probably can't tell a cow from an elk. Frankly, it wouldn't surprise me if some livestock owners negotiated to give up their grazing rights on public land in return for getting rid of the wolves just so they and their domestic animals could live on their own private land again without being harassed.

Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 14, 2010 - 11:49pm PT
19th century Morees all over again!
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Nov 14, 2010 - 11:54pm PT
So what's your 21st century solution then?

Driving livestock owners out of business and turning public land back to the wildlife exclusively, still isn't going to restore the pre-Columbian world.

Fritz

Trad climber
Hagerman, ID
Nov 15, 2010 - 12:03am PT
Jan: I think your last post is right on!

The one thing that unites all the various interests in the mountain states however, as far as I can tell, is their contempt for the way the wolves were imposed on them by the federal government and sentimental folks who live in urban areas who probably can't tell a cow from an elk. Frankly, it wouldn't surprise me if some livestock owners negotiated to give up their grazing rights on public land in return for getting rid of the wolves again just so they and their domestic animals could live on their own private land again without being harassed.

However I suspect that most ranchers that have huge allotments of public land for grazing will: give up their grazing rights "when the govenment pries their dead fingers off the last cheap allotment"

You have to remember that every Rockies politician has to be photographed on a horse, in cowboy dress. That action, and opposing gun control: means there is a good chance of being elected.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 15, 2010 - 12:07am PT
Jaybro-
I'll bet you wouldn't turn down a big, sizzzlin' t-bone, either. That could be priced off the event horizon by running the farmers and ranchers out of business, as this wolf issue threatens to do...
I know you are a UWyo grad, and probably understand the issue and are being a "devil's advocate." :D
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 15, 2010 - 12:14am PT
Fritz-

Several election cycles ago, a gal by the name of Kathy Karpan ran for Governer in Wyoming as a Democrat. She wasn't very "outdoorsey," but she dressed up in some borrowed hunting clothes, complete with "Elmer Fudd" hat, and was then photographed with a borrowed rifle as "hunting" in the City Park in Cheyenne! She became a complete laughing stock among ranchers, and outdoorsmen in general.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 12:27am PT
"At least with killer wolf packs roaming Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, the forests are not infested with illegal immigrants growing pot and polluting the streams with their pesticides as in California."--Jan



It's the weather and short outdoor growing season that keep the pot farmers away from Montana and the other two states you mentioned--wolves play no role here in that regard...




...besides, too many deer would be eating the outdoor crops; our best Medical MJ is of the indoor variety. Waay easier to grow inside than outside, objective hazards and the like.



Fritz

Trad climber
Hagerman, ID
Nov 15, 2010 - 12:36am PT
Jan: Sorry to say it---but Hispanic pot farms on Government lands are apparently prospering in South Idaho, the last two summers.

There have been some well-publicized busts-which means there must be many more that have not been busted.

As I remember from my "mis-spent youth:" pot grows just fine at 5,000 Ft. in the Northern Rockies.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 15, 2010 - 12:47am PT
Pot farms are not the issue that meth labs are in those, and probably all, states.

edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 12:48am PT
Fritz, correct in that MJ does grow fine in higher elevation northern states, but as one travels North in latitude the season gets so short that growers must decide to put all of their "eggs" into one basket and risk dropping it...or go indoors.

Side note .02



edit: Jaybro speaks truth
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 15, 2010 - 01:05am PT
Jan, you're putting words and scenarios in my mouth that I didn't suggest, nor profess.

Broke, yes i am indeed a UDub grad, and have family on the land in Wyo (mostly county 17). I 'get' this complicated situation more than most, reading this, if not as intimetlly as yourself. It's not clear cut, at all. And yes, I do try to poke the hornets nest with a pointed stick at times.

Full disclosure though, i haven't eaten a T-bone, or any mammal, at least on purpose, since at least a year before I graduated in '82.
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 15, 2010 - 01:27am PT
In reference to source material, posted on Supertopo Forum, about past remarks from the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.... recent dramatic declines in elk population have moved the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation to change from a position of what RMEF President David Allen describes was "sitting on the fence about wolves," to its present stance, which favors "managing wolves like other predators, because their population numbers have soared way over the benchmark goals of the re-introduction as elk herds have declined by 80 percent or more in certain areas of the Northern Rockies."

“In letters to legislators and newspapers across the West, the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation is calling out groups like Defenders of Wildlife, Western Wildlife Conservancy and others for their disingenuous use of data on wolves and elk.”

Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Calls Out Motives of Wolf Groups
http://www.rmef.org/NewsandMedia/NewsReleases/2010/WolfGroupMotives.htm
pc

climber
Nov 15, 2010 - 01:43am PT
Holy number spinning batman. Those are some pretty strikingly different takes on the 25 year situation from 2009 to 2010 by RMEF.(Thanks for posting AC) Please take everything these folks say with a big grain of salt. They're hunters! a: They don't want competition for the kill. b: They want another species to kill.

This is from the "About Us" section of the RMEF (Rocky Mtn. Elk Foundation)

History

In 1984, four hunters from Troy, Montana, founded the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation to guarantee a wild future for North America's grandest game animal. (perhaps second grandest now that they've got the wolf in their sights)



Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 15, 2010 - 02:19am PT
The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation table showing total elk population in Idaho rising from 110,000 in 1984 to 115,000 in 2009 conflicts with Idaho Fish and Game population counts which show a drop of 20% in 15 years; 125,000 in 1995 to 100,000 in 2010.
http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/cms/news/fg_news/10/aug.pdf

Total elk population of a state is a misleading number, some areas are doing fine (no wolves) and some areas are crashing (with wolves.)The Lolo herds in northern-central Idaho have dropped about 80 %. In Montana, the Gallatin-Madison herd has dropped 67% to 81%.

From Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks:

http://westinstenv.org/wildpeop/2009/02/11/wolves-reducing-elk-populations-in-montana/

For a long time wildlife experts outside the Montana Dept. of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks have been pointing out the effects of uncontrolled wolf predation on Northern Rocky Mountain elk herds.

This week the MFWP reached the same conclusion. Department biologists tracking elk numbers have noticed an alarming decline in the cow-calf ratio, a sign of imminent population crash.

As a result, the MFWP is reducing hunting permits, although over-hunting by humans is not the problem. The exploding wolf population is — wolves have been mass slaughtering elk at an unsustainable rate.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 15, 2010 - 08:57am PT
dingus,

i assume you will be climbing in wool, hobnails, or better yet, leave all that sh#t at home and go barefooted. manifest destiny or some such sh#t.

fact is that us humans have been playing around with what species will live even when the first white dudes came west of the Mississippi. we have messed with the natural balance and now each special interest group is fighting for theirs.

besides, i dont have a clue why i am bothering discussing species management with some dude who has a bear on his f*#king flag that the californains got rid of...

EDIT:

could someone tell me why the cali's honor the bear that they made extinct in their state? then to have you guys pretend to tell the other states how to manage their wildlife? freakin hilarious.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 15, 2010 - 09:05am PT
i like wolves.....


and elk, buffalo, moose, bears, i love all the furry animals.

but until we give back all their natural homes from our subdivisions, ski areas all that then we have to manage them all. hopefully we can do it better than California did their bear.
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Nov 15, 2010 - 09:16am PT
Any stats available for number of tags issued vs number of elk harvested? Success rates have remained pretty high IIRC

And while numbers of elk are down in certain areas, it's not proven that it's because they are all dead...herds have split up and relocated according to some.

A whole lot of factors at play here...and alot of passionate folks wanting the best for our wildlands.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 15, 2010 - 10:32am PT
I happen to like elk; steak, hamburger, meat loaf, etc.

Joking aside, I haven't eaten any elk in maybe 20 years. For those who have never hunted elk, IT'S VERY HARD WORK! It's not simply "going out and shooting one." Guiding and outfitting is (or it WAS) a big industry in Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana. The reduction of the Yellowstone herd population caused the Wyoming G & F Commission to premanantly close the Dubois game check station several years ago, as fewer and fewer hunters ever came through with game. On the other hand, more and more hunters are applying for the area in which I live, which is a drawing/limited license area.

Lois-
The idea of "give me a home where the buffalo roam" has a very romantic sound to it. I've had a neighbor that raised buffalo for the market; I recall he had about 30 animals and then about 20 calves every year. He couldn't keep them on his own land worth a hoot, and he had a much bigger place than I do. he was also a very lazy S.O.B. who didn't feed his animals throughout the winter, so they simply tore fences down and visited the neighbors; mainly the neighbor's haystacks. I had some pasture rented from another neighbor,complete with the hay and irrigation water rights. I succeeded in putting up about 40 large rounds, each weighing 1200 pounds, of pretty decent hay. I stacked they hay there and started using it bale-by-bale. It was in 2 stacks of 20 bales each. One day I went to get hay from the stack nearest the buffalo owner's property and all that was there was....buffalo turds. That was a loss of 24,000 pounds of hay (12 tons), at a cash value (replacement) of $1440.00 Admittedly not a huge amount of money, but the inconvenience of finding a replacement source, and the cash to buy hay during the winter was problematic.

Bottom line: I have no issue with "buffalo roaming," but not on my land or land I've leased. By the way, I received NO reimbursement from the miserable a$$hole for my hay. He went broke anyway, just a few years later.

Another issue with wild buffalo: they are carriers and the natural reservoir of BrucellosisIf you're unfamiliar with the disease, it affects cattle by rendering cows sterile and incapable of reproduction.
JC5123

Big Wall climber
Casper, WY
Nov 15, 2010 - 10:46am PT
Declining elk populations have more to do with mismanagement of land than wolves. IMHO Touching on a few points that I have seen made. It's the uber rich coming in and buying up all the land they can. But what they will do is buy up a bunch of cheaper land surrounding prime public land. They land lock it and then close off access. Then they only allow guided hunts. (for which they get paid quite well)This leads to decreased harvest rates, since the elk all move to these "low pressure" areas. But all packed together like that, they end up dieing of starvation and illness. It's all the weak, and dead that attract the wolves and other predators. After all, what we all like to think of as skilled hunters, i.e. lions, wolves, bears. Most of their diet is made up from scavenged carcasses.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:45am PT
I have no problem with the people paying ranchers fair market value for their livestock losses.
I do. It's not like they're an S&L or something....
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Nov 15, 2010 - 01:36pm PT
Actual wolf weights often skimpier than hunters estimate

Adult females averaged 86 pounds, according to Idaho Department of Fish and Game officials, who also included the weights of wolves struck by vehicles in the survey. For adult males, 101 pounds was the average.


Stats from the 2009 Montana Wolf hunt:
General age classification:
· 22 juveniles; 31% of total harvest
· 22 yearlings; 31% of total harvest
· 27 adults; 38% of total harvest
· 1 unknown
Weights:
· Juveniles weighed 62 pounds on average. Yearlings weighed about 80 pounds. Adults weighed
97 pounds. One wolf weighed 117 pounds.
Sex of harvest:
· A total of 41 males and 31 females were harvested.


from:
http://fwpiis.mt.gov/content/getItem.aspx?id=41454
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Nov 15, 2010 - 05:26pm PT
a bit about livestock reimbursement

...$141,462 in claims was paid for confirmed and probable death losses in 2009.

·Confirmed cattle death losses increased to 97 in 2009, and confirmed sheep death losses increased to 202. Other confirmed livestock losses include: 4 llamas, 4 dogs, and 2 goats. Other injury and death
losses were not verified or were deemed “probable.” Other impacts are difficult to quantify, but do occur.

· A total of 145 wolves were killed to prevent further depredations.


from
http://fwpiis.mt.gov/content/getItem.aspx?id=42353
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 06:11pm PT
Any and every person that wants wolves walking where-ever need put their money where their mouth is:

http://www.ypf.org/donate/wolfcollar.asp

A worthy cause to back up your opinions;-)





edit: I wonder what the total cost of the Wolf Re-introduction has cost the taxpayers--exponentially higher that what Federal organizations have paid out for domestic predation re-imbursements, eh?
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 08:32pm PT
Giving a driving lesson to a teen (no snickers TK...), Crowley, sorry I was out.



The answer to your question would be:

"Yes, but there doesn't seem to be a general consensus on why millions of tax payer dollars were allocated to do it (nor the total of how much per wolf) and why the Fed won't let States decide upon its own game/wildlife management."
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 15, 2010 - 08:40pm PT
A drop in the bucket compared to what we pay to subsidize the beef industry...
and then there's the medical expenses on the taxpayer's tab for people who eat beef...
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 08:42pm PT
AC, why haven't you answered or addressed MY questions? I have been more than co-operative with you...


I'll re-post them-- if you are the kind of person who can't scan a thread for other peoples' posts;-)



Jay, I know that we are 180 degrees different on meat and consumption, but no biggee--I appreciate where you are coming from,and are going with it.

Crowley, on the other hand is just a member of the Antagonist Party; I can respect that, but in the long run it just leads to frustration and alcohol:-(
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 15, 2010 - 08:47pm PT
Since Wyoming and Montana, areas encompassing Yellowstone National Park were involved, the State G & F people were "consulted" by the Feds. There were only objections to the Federal plan, but it was executed over the protests of the States so impacted. The rest, as the saying goes, is history.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 08:49pm PT
A great number for the BEGINNING of the program--what have the total expenses on OUR dime been since.

After that first year, the budget went waay up--but you won't want to dig up those numbers because YOU can't do that math...
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 15, 2010 - 08:51pm PT
Jaybro-

About the supposed health problems from eating beef? Man, we need to talk! I'm not going to get into that issue here, causing thread drift!
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 08:55pm PT
TO DATE, Al C., to date--reread the question...


This is an interesting set of "datum":


COSTS OF WOLF REINTRODUCTION



While comprising approximately 2% of the population, farmers and ranchers provide the products that feed and clothe the rest of the nation. Farmers, ranchers and private property owners provide 70% of all wildlife habitat and forage. At the same time agriculture withstands most of the damage caused by wildlife.



POINTS TO PONDER

The cost of killing one pack of 5 wolves that were killing cattle and sheep near Browning, Montana, was $41,000. One wolf was impossible to catch because of constant movement. (Bill Rightmire, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Animal Damage Control, Billings, MT, July 18, 1998)

Minnesota annually kills depredating wolves at the cost of $1,225 each. (David Mech, "Challenge and Opportunity of Recovering Wolf Populations" 1995) Minnesota killed 227 wolves in 1997.

The USFWS office concerned with reintroducing wolves to the Smokey Mountains spent $140,000 a year for 8 years before ending this part of the North Carolina program. Authorities found that wolves could not survive in the Smokies old growth forest environment.



WOLF REINTRODUCTION COSTS TO AGRICULTURE BEFORE ANY DEPREDATION OCCURS

-Increased labor and feed costs from keeping livestock in or near barns at night

-Predator control costs from electric fencing, guard animals and adverse conditioning devices

-Extra help to tend livestock

-Phone calls to authorities reporting wolf sightings

-Replacement or vet bills caused by wolf attacks on guard dogs

-Weight loss and abortion of fetuses caused by stress and harassment from wolves

-Additional veterinary costs

COSTS AFTER DEPREDATION

-Phone calls to authorities reporting depredation

-Time lost finding carcasses or injured animals

-Time lost isolating the injured or killed animal(s) (the animal must not be moved)

-Time lost completing paperwork, correspondence and negotiation until payment is realized

-Time lost during the investigation and resolution of the problem (trapping, relocation, killing depredating animal)

-Replacement/shipment of breeding stock



COMPENSATION

-The attack or kill must be verified (there must be a freshly killed or injured animal and evidence of wolf involvement i.e. footprints and monitoring evidence)

-Difficulties of verification:

lack of corpse if devoured or carried off

scavengers and other predators making initial predation unidentifiable

with warm weather and a less than immediate investigation, predator bites and marks became unidentifiable

-Defenders of Wildlife only lists cattle and sheep for compensation

-Defenders' compensation fund only lasts until the wolf is delisted



RESOLUTION OF THE PROBLEM

-No action if there is no depredation

-The property owner kills the wolf while it is depredating (on private property)

-Trapping and releasing depredating females and pups on site until August

-Trapping and relocating depredating animals (which has proven remarkably ineffective)

-Wildlife Services (formerly ADC) kills the offending animal



COST OF WOLF REINTRODUCTION PROGRAM

-Importing wolves

-Continuing inoculations for heartworm, parvo etc.

-Radio collaring

-Monitoring signals

-Training personnel how to use traps etc.

-Increased expenditures for response to increased investigations of suspected depredation

-Increased funds needed for more intensive game management (trapping, lethal control, translocation, possible sterilization)

-Ongoing and increasing funding by the state for compensation when the wolf is down-listed

-Funding for legal fees to counter lawsuits brought by environmental organizations and property owners



LOSS OF FUNDS

-For wildlife management

-Consider losses incurred by Alaska

loss of ungulate harvest (moose 10-12%)

loss of bear harvest (25-30%)

loss of harvest of fur bearing animals

reduction of fish and game fund income

loss of taxable income from lodges and restaurants and hunting equipment as hunting declined

INCREASE IN TOURIST INCOME

-Is questionable - Yellowstone National Park shows no overall increase in tourism; weather, not wolves, is the determining factor in the number of tourists.While more tourists are entering by the gate where wolves are more visible, construction and traffic congestion at other gates is also a factor.



WHO THE PROGRAM BENEFITS

-Biologists

-Environmental organizations who send out continual fund-raising letters while pushing this program



MAXIMUM PENALTY FOR SHOOTING A REINTRODUCED WOLF

-One year in prison

-$100,000 fine



DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE



The Wolf Management Committee developed a wolf recovery plan for Yellowstone, Glacier National Park and Central Idaho, also including Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. The committee had varied representation. Defenders of Wildlife and The National Wildlife Federation vetoed the plan. Defenders lobbied Congress for implementation of one part of the USFWS plan. The Wolf Committee plan was ignored.When Defenders of Wildlife first began to lobby for wolf reintroduction, they talked of "35 to 45" wolves in all of Yellowstone Park (Randall 1981:31). Now plans call for 10 wolf packs totaling approximately 100 wolves in Yellowstone. (Dr. Charles Kay) Wolves in Minnesota surpassed the number needed to remove the species from the Endangered Species List, yet were not allowed to be removed because wolf populations in Wisconsin and Michigan were far short of goals of the Eastern Wolf Recovery Plan. One state was hostage to what happened in other areas. (Dr. Charles Kay) Montana and Idaho issued draft plans for when wolf recovery would be turned over to state managers (Rachael 1995, Ream 1995). Both documents claimed that 20 wolf packs were needed in each area before hunting and trapping would be allowed. Thus, they have effectively doubled the number of wolves needed to meet ESA requirements. (Dr. Charles Kay)

The Sierra Club and Defenders of Wildlife said last week they would sue the USFWS if the federal agency agreed to turn over wolf management to Minnesota under any state plan that includes public hunting or trapping. (January 1998, Minnesota Outdoors News)

Defenders of Wildlife will not allow the Great Lake states to delist the wolf until a new rule has been approved for wolf recovery in the New England and Middle Atlantic States. (This would allow greater numbers of wolves to be required in these areas before they could be delisted.) (November 1998, Steve Kendrodt, Defenders of Wildlife)
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 15, 2010 - 08:56pm PT
I wasn't privy to the discussions; only the newspaper crap. It was various "Biodiversity," or "Friends of the Animals" type groups involved. Virtually everyone else thought the idea was a disaster-in-making.
To quote Professor Revilo P.Oliver, Distinguished professor of philology at the University of Illinois many years ago: "The real problem with do-gooders, is against whom they will do-good next."
Willoughby

Social climber
Truckee, CA
Nov 15, 2010 - 09:07pm PT
Apparently wolves are good for servers, too. From today's xkcd:

http://xkcd.com/819/


The mouseover caption reads:

"The wolves thin the RAID arrays, removing the slowest and weakest disks, to keep average seek speed high."

edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 09:33pm PT
Guess that you don't see the word TOTAL highlighted in you quote re-post.


Oh well...




















edit: Your (the questions directed at you on your post) questions were:

"And precisely/exactly how are you "familiar" with this issue, sir Crowley...


Know some ranchers with killed livestock, been in the ranching game yourself, investigated wolf predation? AND how do you know more than any of us ('cept for telling us you do) ?"

(Which is what we're all doing on this thread 'cept for a few.)
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 09:46pm PT
Your 15 year-old first year figure is accurate but misleading...



Do you really believe that your number (1996 stats) is ALL that was appropriated and budgeted for YNP wolves and their "re-introduction"?


Yikes! You really are an expert and DO know fairly know more on the subject than most.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 15, 2010 - 09:47pm PT
Moj, Broke, we can talk about this on email or something, as it works out. I'm just riding in, suckerfish like, on the Shark of Hysteria, here...
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 09:50pm PT
Jay--I'm just yapping off on this from a perspective of a Greater YNP "local". My interest in it fades away as soon as I click off this thread:-)
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 09:58pm PT
Great question, AC--you will not be able to find that controversial number that ires the tax-payer so. But, believe me that a ton of coin has gone into collering, tracking, data collection, man power, helicopter expenses, etc....SINCE that 1996 figure.


You won't believe me on this anyways, but I challenge the Great Crowley to find those numbers. You may just prove me to be a blow-hard, not the first time nor the last--but I doubt it.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 10:04pm PT
This guy knew how to deal with the pesky Lobo:

rottingjohnny

Sport climber
mammoth lakes ca
Nov 15, 2010 - 10:04pm PT
I'd be more worried about Nature's predatory habits than those Bonner county wolves...
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 15, 2010 - 10:11pm PT
A drop in the bucket compared to what we pay to subsidize the beef industry...
and then there's the medical expenses on the taxpayer's tab for people who eat beef...

jaybro,

i love a good steak! besides, if the gov pays for stupid ass climbers that need to be rescued then i ought to be able to eat a good steak.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 15, 2010 - 10:24pm PT
I dunno Hawk. I don't believe in either.

How do you feel about sinking your teeth into a cotton and down dressed el cap aspirant of a November-January vintage?
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 15, 2010 - 10:28pm PT
AND how do you know more than any of us ('cept for telling us you do) ?"

edejom,

AC knows more about this than any of us cuz he livs in CA. they feeeel guilty about killin their great golden bear off. but they know damn well that their state is too civilized for those beasts or wolves. hell their black bears have learned how to break into cars fro chrissakes. but those califrnians know what best for montanans. i dont know when you montanans are gonna figure it out...

EDIT:

jay, sorry...i dont get it. but i do like beef sometimes.
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 15, 2010 - 10:30pm PT
In Yellowstone Park(excluding wolves introduced to Idaho wilderness), cost
estimates on wolf recovery are from $200,000 to 1 million per wolf.

http://www.aws.vcn.com/fact.html

and Brodie Farquhar. "Gray Wolves increase tourism in Yellowstone National Park". Yellowstone Journal and YellowstonePark.com. http://www.yellowstonepark.com/MoreToKnow/ShowNewsDetails.aspx?newsid=182.

By government accounts, Fish and Wildlife Service has spent $17 million introducing the Mackenzie Valley subspecies into Yellowstone and Idaho Wilderness.
http://www.rangemagazine.com/archives/spring2004/theyrebaaack.htm
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 15, 2010 - 10:32pm PT
Two-Thirds of Idaho Wolf Carcasses Examined
Have Thousands of Hydatid Disease Tapeworms

http://balanceduse.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/TheOutdoorsmanNo-36-Wolf-Tapeworm.pdf
HighTraverse

Social climber
Bay Area
Nov 15, 2010 - 10:47pm PT
could someone tell me why the cali's honor the bear that they made extinct in their state? then to have you guys pretend to tell the other states how to manage their wildlife? freakin hilarious.
What a silly argument.

Could it be because in the 88 years since the last one was killed we've learned something?

In California we've also saved the Brown Pelican, Peregrine Falcon (UC Santa Cruz) and California Condor (San Diego Wild Animal Park and Los Angeles Zoo) from near extinction, largely from DDT poisoning. The Bald Eagle, great American Symbol, might also be extinct if we still had DDT
The major cause of Condor losses now is lead from hunter's bullets, lead bullets now outlawed in California areas near Condor habitats for big game species. Lead bullets are still legal for upland game species in protection zones. (go figure).

I remember when DDT was banned in the US. The End Of The World Was Nigh! The Nixon administration fought a Federal District Court order to ban most uses of DDT. We would be overrun by insects and vermin. Agricultural production would be reduced. Farm workers would be out of work. Big Government was out to destroy the farmer and golf courses.
Now the wolves are going to do it? Give me a break.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 15, 2010 - 10:52pm PT
HT, no personal offense. but no where else in the states that i know of have black bears learned to break into cars. cali's wildlife management has a hell of a lot to be desired.

why the hell havent you reintroduced grizz? cuz you dont want to f*#k with them at lake tahoe right?

EDIT:

BTW, i have personally cleaned up superfund sites contaminated with DDT so dont lecture me on the end of teh world crap. what most are saying is to shoot a few more wolves....frankly, i would like to see them, the wolves that is...but i also see the point of the ranchers.


this thread is why politics in merica is all f*#ked up. peeps would rather argue than try and unnerstand both sides of the equation and that is the STUPIDEST f*#kin thing that they can do..
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:00pm PT
um, the wind Rivers? Jackson wyo? Wisconsin? Michigan? Florida? they break in regularly in those places...
HighTraverse

Social climber
Bay Area
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:01pm PT
Two-Thirds of Idaho Wolf Carcasses Examined
Have Thousands of Hydatid Disease Tapeworms

Ummmmm.....can you cite any wild species that doesn't have various intestinal pests?
How about Black Bears?
Roundworms (Toxascaris sp.) were the most common endoparasite in New York, occurring in 31% of bears sampled. In the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, 90% of bears were infected with the larval form of Dirofilaria ursi, a roundworm related to the dog heartworm. In New York, 46% of bears harbored this parasite.

    from Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife

Time to destroy all the Black Bears in New York State and the Great Smokies.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:08pm PT
well guys,

i guarantee you that i camp out in a hell of a lot more off the beaten path areas than you do, and like i said, i did not KNOW of any areas where that happened.

what that tells me is that , yes, other areas need to police cars and bears. and that if this is a reflection on hikers and climbers then they need to get thier sh#t together on what they do with regards to food storage.

AC callin me cityboy is like RJ callin me uneducated and is pure ignorance...
HighTraverse

Social climber
Bay Area
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:12pm PT
Hawkeye, I'm not going to get into a pissing match with you.
I was responding to your ridiculous statement about Californians and how they're responsible for destroying the Grizzly Bear, therefore have no standing to discuss wild habitat management. I don't believe you were being ironic.

I listen to both sides when the arguments are sensible and based on facts. I ignore or refute nonsense, hyperbole and slander when presented as arguments.
Wolves are certainly top predators.
So are the mountain lions that frequent my neighborhood.

Flame away.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:12pm PT
BTW,
i am still wondering WTF is up with Californians with an EXTINCT bear on their flag tellin Montanans and others what to so with their wolves. talk about f*#king hipocrisy.

introduce several packs into yosemite and then start restricting access and gettin rid of everyone that lives in the valley, thats my idea, whats yours?
EDIT:

throw in some GRIZZ in yosemite while you are at it. next thing you know it will be impactin you then you can pretend to have the answers...
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:14pm PT
i guarantee you that i camp out in a hell of a lot more off the beaten path areas than you do,
I truly doubt that, Hawk, at least in my own case. But if true, Um that may be the reason you don't know about the bear problem that has swept the rest of the country, while you were out in the wilds, with an internet connection....
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:21pm PT
Play along with the rest of us and answer simple questions, AC...





"And precisely/exactly how are you "familiar" with this issue, sir Crowley--inquiring minds want to know...


Know some ranchers with killed livestock, been in the ranching game yourself, investigated wolf predation? AND how do you know more than any of us ('cept for telling us you do) ?

Certainly, an expert as yourself can quantify YOUR opinions."--me
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:22pm PT
lets see, off the beaten path in bear and wolf country in BC, WA, ID, OR, MT this summer alone. no other cars where i park usually. no other campers. you figer it out AC.

internet connection? you f*#ks are funny. check it out i am not on here as much as you guys.

blow hard AC? thats a good one coming from someone so full of sh#t as you.....i am truly honored.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:24pm PT
simple fact is i am calling for MODERATION from all the special interest groups. BUTT we all know this is not good sport, nor is it good politics. therefore we argue without seeing the other points of view and we all end up being f*#ked for it.

some morons will never figure this out.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:26pm PT
AC, the only facts you have shared is that you are a f*#king blowhard moron. but in case we are wrong share some other facts to consider....
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:30pm PT
The question(s) to you Crowley are simple and don't need a subjective internet search...


A quality human being should be able to back their claims--OR admit they are full of wind, I do both.


Do you?

edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:30pm PT
Searching.......
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:36pm PT
AC,
if wolves and grizz aint a problem, then how come cali does not introduce them?

simple question. guess what the answer is! your politicians and your people in power, and you recreationalists dont want the hassles of dealing with it. but hagn your head proud with the extinct bear on your flag that makes a hell of a lot of sense dont it blowhard.
corniss chopper

Mountain climber
san jose, ca
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:43pm PT
Wiping out the CA grizzly led to several benefits. Ditto for the wolves here.

Humans in a way have filled the wolf's niche in our modern world of
animal husbandry. They are not needed where humans live.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:46pm PT
Tell us all the answers to (y)our questions AC...


I can re-post them if the wine is kicking in:-)




edit: Your blow-hardiness is starting to show, Matthew--time to answer up.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 15, 2010 - 11:50pm PT
ic CC, so Montana and ID should have killed more elk....go it
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:07am PT
look...

Y'all are going to have to learn to live with these animals.


Yes, Mr Crowley, …as long as the Rocky Mountains are vassal states to high handed aristocrats and bromide bureaucrats in the east…and cavalier tourism from the southwest, we’ll continue learning to live with what they inflict.

…just wondering why they couldn’t impose animals of the subspecies native to the western Great Lakes states who happen to be of the same subspecies as our native wolves…or better still, inflate and enhance the native animals that still existed in small numbers in central Idaho wilderness and the (Montana/ Idaho)Continental Divide.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:15am PT
C'mon Jennie, quit throwing out questions that need to be answered--THAT is not Crowley's style, it is evident that he can't account for his proffers.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:19am PT
Wolves have never been a part of California's ecosystem actually; except for the desert portions and some of the East side.

jennie, mr AC as he is respectfully known on taco, is one of those blatherers, who as i stated earlier cannot try and unnnnerstan that working through issues involves seeing all sides.

its, cool. californias flag is the greatest sign of hipocracy on issue like this......where much of thert population says do what i say not what we have or are doing.

you poor souls in ID will have to get with the program. understand that those in population centers that travel on the weekends to wild areas want to take nice pics of wolves, bears and other furry critters but those in the population centers know way better that you in ID about how to manage your immediate problems. you idahoans need to drink the koolaid and understand....

you see above mr AC, aknowledges that CA had wolves, but as mr. CC says, they killed off all teh food of the wolves who used to live there. so they dont need wolves anymore.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 16, 2010 - 12:19am PT
I'm officially withdrawing from the conversation and going to bed..spattered by all the bull $hit that's coming from the King of Trollers, AC!

If AC had lost as much money as the folks here in La Prele Valley have collectively, to the predations of two wolves over the past year, he'd be living in a nice cardboard box, hoping it doesn't rain.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:24am PT
i hear you BD.

i feel for you. my grandpas both had ranches and herded sheep. my dad was a vet. mom was a farm girl.

you guys in Big Wonderful probably got it worse from the perspective of political clout than idahoans, but apparently, you WYomingites need to drink the koolaid too...your screwed. AC and others are out after their own political best thinking agendas that dont have a clue about the trials of a small time rancher like yourself.

edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:31am PT
Hawk, Broke--don't you realize that an old wino living somewhere else knows more than you?


Get with the program; being there is not as important as telling people that you were there (sarc) !





edit: Hahaha! AC posts a 10 year-old report and wants you to accept it as fact--wine all around to the greying fools!
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:39am PT
come on ac 1997?

The success of the recovery program has exceeded FWS expectations and has prompted Secretary Babbitt to announce that further reintroductions will not be necessary in the northern Rocky Mountain area. While some losses of wolves have occurred, the rate of mortality in the wolf populations has been far lower than anticipated. Several wolves have been killed illegally, with others dying from natural causes or accidents, or being destroyed by FWS and ADC for repeated attacks on livestock. In addition, wolf packs in both Yellowstone and Idaho have produced several successful litters in the breeding seasons since their release. The Yellowstone population now approaches 100 wolves and the central Idaho population has grown to approximately 70 wolves. In northwestern Montana, where populations have naturally immigrated from Canada, FWS estimates there to be 100 - 120 wolves. Thus, recovery goals may be met ahead of schedule and at lower cost.

fact is, the experts had little clue about how successful wolves would be in the wild.

what most folks who live near wild areas want is to not have their lives/livlihood impacted by wolves and are calling for more proactive management.

edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:40am PT
Never mind the above post by a drunken genius who can't answer his own (or others) questions.


Come to Montana, the cheapest wolf kill that money can buy--hill, I know of a dozen ranchers that will pay you to shoot them; forget buying the tag and going legit!



edit: A few simple answers of easy questions may save you here, Matthew (but I doubt that you can keystroke the query results).






My son in Kindergarten can explain your reactions, AC--keep it up, he's writing a synopsis of you...
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:40am PT
have another drink of whine AC, we are still waiting for your "PEAK"
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:45am PT
No, AC--just your answers, pretty simple really.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:45am PT
no nanny needed. the drunk ass whineohh (you) is providin all teh inertainment we can stans
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:49am PT
Give Crowley a break--he picks up Yosemite garbage in a florescent vest. That (in his mind) is all the credibility he needs.


Just like fatty, his buddy.




edit: Crowley-dude, you can't even justify your position; don't even dare to posit questions. My wife does that when she is wrong and it is SOOO pathetic. Account, answer, defend and move on...



...Kindergarten, remember?
corniss chopper

Mountain climber
san jose, ca
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:53am PT
The wolf had the enormous Tule Elk herds of central California to prey upon
in its pristine state before the gun was introduced.

It was estimated that half a million Tule Elk roamed these regions and that the grandness of the scene has only been likened to what is seen in the Serengeti.

Spanish brought cattle and horses which escaped and formed large uncontrolled herds of feral animals. Reports from the 1830s and 1840s mention the San Joaquin prairies swarming with wild horses and Sonoma County abounding with wild cattle and horses (Wagner 1989).
More wolf food.

http://bss.sfsu.edu/holzman/courses/Fall00Projects/tule_elk.html

http://californiarangeland.ucdavis.edu/Publications%20pdf/CRCC/California%20Native%20Grasslands%20-%20A%20Historical%20Perspective.pdf

The sight of elk on a California landscape exerts a powerful emotional
pull.

The enormous antlers, the furry neck and size of this creature,
standing tall in the grass, evoke a time when wildlife outnumbered people.
Glad the wolf is gone though.


Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:53am PT
ac, my sister lives on the border of the lee metcalf wilderness. wolf tracks in her yard. lower elk populations.

i was grown up worrying about the little guy. but you guys in cali can fly your flag with the extinct bear on it with all the glory you got coming....
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:55am PT
AC: I'll out AID you, Free you, Boulder you, and THINK you every time.


Drink another glass of Red courage, and reminisce about when you actually sweated on the stone...
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 12:59am PT
thank you AC!

coming from someone who has their head up their ass and whole net worth is their ST reputation i take that as a compliment!

EDIT:
read base 104's post again AC, you might learn something.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:14am PT
i ran into wolf cubs in the spring, in an area of WA state that had no known wolf packs, but a huge elk population. this was about 5 years ago. they were in a clea cutting area on a remote dirt road.

i called the FS. they had no clue. others i talked with wanted me to alert the "activist" groups to shut the logging down. not that i care for clear cuts, but hey, i live in a wood house like most of you.

point is that wolves are intelligent, hunt and reproduce well. better than the large ungulates that they feed on. they are multiplying and doing better than anyone ever imagined cuz bioloigists didnt figgger that into the equation.

the thing that most folks want out of any discussion is reason from both sides..............BUT THAT AINT FUN, NOR SPORTING. much better to bitch to everyone and argue...
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:18am PT
Hey. I am sad that it came to this, but humans are going to keep on screwing and eating and nothing is going to stop it until the temps rise or we simply devour all of our natural resources. Some species adapt very well to our presence and prosper. Others we try to keep from going extinct like life support.

Then we may all go back to living in teepees in the U.S. like the natives did. Hell, we might even be happier that way. I would rather be out in a teepee right now instead of typing in here while surrounded by a bunch of humming computers.

But altruism is not a trait of the human race.

yep, fortunately, or unfortunately, we are "more advanced" than most species and therefore we look after ourselves first. whether that is right or wrong may be open to debate....


the really stupid thing is that we would rather argue than try and figure out a way to solve issues....look at DC for that
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:23am PT
ac, i got to hand it to you....you are a belligerant determined SOB! so WTF? prove a minor point in your masterdebate while blowing off the hard questions of others? nice! you prove my point!?

edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:26am PT
"So....

What is the current YNP area population, and how does it compare to the 2009 kills?"






Sir AC--YOU can't even answer simple subjective questions; you have no standing to ask any.



































Except for changing the subject, and re-directing with accusations. The hysterics that entertain would make my Kindergarten son run to the playground--school is out, let the revelry begin for recess!
pc

climber
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:28am PT
Just checking back in after being out for a day...Wow...You guys really know how to party.

I do believe this thread is indicative of a recurring theme here on the Taco:

'What we have here is a failure to..... 'step away from the keyboard'.'

- pc (in my best drill sergeant key tapping voice)
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:29am PT
the issues are that some of the "affected folks" ought to have more say in dealing with a growing wolf population than you f*#ks in california that have an extinct bear on their flag.....it is less of an issue for them than it is you, a love of all furry animals.




(I already said i liked all teh furry animals, i was overjoyed to see wolves in the wild and hear them)



but I am not individually affected. but if i were i might feel different, about killing wolves that is...what i mean is, dont force feed your thoughts on people that are more individually affected than you are.







lastly, i dont expect you to get that. what i propose is actually listening and respect for others and we all know that is a thread killer and doesnt win votes...f*#k you need another drink, i will buy you one or three...
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:32am PT
thanks AC! need another drink!? where do i have it shipped?





















ah f*#k, they dont deliver at the insane asylum do they? sorry man, maybe you can cry out fro an injection of some kind....
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:32am PT
Good observation, pc:-)


The way to establish standing is thus:

I have, I think, I've done, I've seen, I've been involved in....




Matthew doesn't start sentences this was because he does none of the aforementioned.

I miss arguing with my wife--at least she adds content.
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:33am PT
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:34am PT
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:35am PT
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:35am PT
nice MH!

now you gave something for AC to jerk off to! so long as he took his purple pill....
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:40am PT
Yet, you still don't answer simple subjective questions.


Tip another one and try...





edit: Life long Montanan and in the "book".


2nd edit: You've e-mailed me, sad that you don't put two and two together.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:40am PT
ac, WTF is yours? f*#king punter....
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:43am PT
clearly edjom and AC should be secret santa buddies....
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:44am PT
Good one, Jay!!!!!



"born and raised in California."--AC


Which gives you SOOO much standing on wolves in Montana...
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:56am PT
2010 Montana Ballot Issues

The following proposals will appear on the November 2, 2010 general election ballot:

CC-2 (Status current as of 11/15/2010)
Subject: Call for a Montana constitutional convention
Type: Periodic submission of question of holding an unlimited constitutional convention
Status: ON BALLOT, pursuant to Article XIV, Section 3 of the Montana Constitution and 13-1-121 and 13-1-122, Montana Code Annotated.

I-161 (Status current as of 11/15/2010)
Subject: Change how hunter access programs are funded
Sponsor: Kurt Kephart
Type: Statutory amendment by initiative
Received by SOS: September 17, 2009
Status: ON BALLOT.
Total signatures received and tallied by SOS: 27,976 signatures, 40 of 34 qualified house districts.

I-164 (Status current as of 11/15/2010)
Subject: Limit the annual interest, fees, and charges payday, title and retail installment lenders and consumer loan licensees may charge on loans to 36 percent.
Sponsor: Jim Reynolds
Type: Statutory amendment by initiative
Received by SOS: February 23, 2010
Status: ON BALLOT -- revised by Order of the Supreme Court of the State of Montana.
Total signatures received and tallied by SOS: 27,421 signatures, 54 of 34 qualified house districts.

CI-105 (Status current as of 11/15/2010)
Subject: Prohibit any new tax on the sale or transfer of real property
Sponsor: Montana Association of REALTORS ®
Type: Constitutional amendment by initiative
Received by SOS: December 15, 2009
Status: ON BALLOT.
Total signatures received and tallied by SOS: 51,736 signatures, 53 of 40 qualified house districts.

A citizen proposed ballot issue can only appear on the 2010 general election ballot once the proposed language has fulfilled three requirements. First, the language must meet the requirements of the Montana’s Legislative Services Division. Second, the Montana Attorney General must conduct a legal review. Finally, after the review process is complete, and the sponsor has been notified by the Secretary of State of the approval or rejection of the ballot issue, the sponsor must collect signatures from qualified voters in Montana.

Initiative or referendum for the ballot - Signatures must be obtained from 5 percent of the total number of qualified voters in Montana, including 5 percent of the voters in each of 34 legislative house districts (a total of 24,337 signatures for the 2010 ballot).

Constitutional amendment by initiative - Signatures must be obtained from 10 percent of the total number of qualified voters in Montana, including 10 percent of the voters in each of 40 legislative house districts (a total of 48,674 signatures for the 2010 ballot).
















But seriously, back to the topic of wolves thrust upon citizens by the Fed ...
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 02:03am PT
good one Matty,

so seriously WTF is up with the extinct bear on the flag? not hypocritical? sounds like it to me....at least you can cry for reintroduction into yosemite....
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 02:03am PT
Gee, only an idiot poses questions without proffering answers--you know, Kindergarten stuff.




























What about the lobos put into my backyard (NOT YOURS) ?
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 02:07am PT
ac, we realize that it might make you feel good to have furry critters runin around while in your state you eradicated them. so put them in our backyard tehn talk to us.....
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 02:10am PT
...as your head spins from the vino.




Anonymous? Me?




Sir, the booze has left your fingertips numb.






































edit: When and where was the last time that you have ever SEEN a wolf in the wild?
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 02:15am PT
ac likes national geo.....especially the half dressed pictures of naked starving woman. he wants to retain that too...
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 02:40am PT
Too bad pate was allowed to return. I think had I been able to stay in the discourse, I could have shown good loigical reason why he should have been at least forced to return as another persona. His existing one is so flawed...





So what is it now, is he doing posts as Pa'te or something, or he just been given a pass to resume hateful battles and attempt to intimidate and ridicule posters into the unknown future?

Looks like he had a two week "time-out".

come on rj, LOL,

i thought this thread was about wolves! get with it man.....
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Nov 16, 2010 - 08:58am PT
edejom is about anonymous as you AC...name and pictures has been posted multiple multiple times...


check out these weekly reports:

http://fwp.mt.gov/wildthings/management/wolf/wolfWeekly2010.html

The issue is actively watched...livestock kills happen and action is taken. Complete packs of wolves are being killed in certain areas...wolf growth was reduced from an estimated 18% to 4% last year...

The can of worms is open and it's not the most cut and dry issue...
dirtbag

climber
Nov 16, 2010 - 10:03am PT
Hooray for DMT.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 10:10am PT
"We're paying for your dole, so you will damn well do as we say."--Dingus






With what money, Sir? Your great State is as broke as a joke--ours is one of two States in the BLACK, and it sure as hill ain't because of your bastardization of a Western state. Your natural resources are gone or impossible to get to for political reasons, while Montana is sitting pretty with plenty of WATER, TIMBER, PLATINUM and OIL.




Good luck on getting those bears back, though;-)
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Nov 16, 2010 - 10:57am PT
Thanks to Kingsbury's recommendation, I've just been reading through Montana's weekly wolf reports. If anyone is interested in what it's really like on the front lines, just read through one of those.

http://fwp.mt.gov/wildthings/management/wolf/wolfWeekly2010.html

Then ask yourself if our nation doesn't have better ways to spend its money and energy than fighting, controling, and reimbursing for wolf predation?

Surely historians will look back and say that in the midst of two wars, a global battle against terrorism, peak oil problems, global warming, trade imbalances, currency devaluation, and hundreds of millions of dollars of bailouts, the fact that we chose to reintroduce wolves and spend so much money and effort on them was just one more sign of the denial and arrogance that destroyed us in the end.
stevep

Boulder climber
Salt Lake, UT
Nov 16, 2010 - 10:58am PT
The wolf issue is a complicated one. Frankly, as far as personal safety goes, I'm alot more worried about mt. lions than wolves. Ranchers I have some sympathy for. Hunters, not much.

But let's not bring this tea party, anti-federal govt bs into the discussion. Montana and Wyoming both receive more than the average in dollars per capita of federal spending. Alaska, that great paradigm of western self-reliance, is wayyy up at the top of that list. CA is down near the bottom.
Stop sucking from the federal teat, then maybe you have some standing to complain about the feds imposing things on you.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 16, 2010 - 11:02am PT
no more grazing on public lands!
pc

climber
Nov 16, 2010 - 11:29am PT
I'm with Jaybro on that one ^^^^^^
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 11:40am PT
Me too, pc:-)
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:16pm PT
We're not so damned whiney as those great westerns in Montana and Idaho who mostly live on Federal handouts anyway - water, power and range land, all provided for the Rugged Individualists (LOL!!!1111) by the rest of America.

If you all don't like it up there, feel free to desist from the teat. Take no more, then you will know what its like to live free like we do in CA.

We're paying for your dole, so you will damn well do as we say.


Many thanks for providing us with water, power and range land, Dingus. It's true, we moaning idlers in the Rocky Mountains don't know how to live.

Please! We'll do anything you say!...You and your fellow Californians... please continue teaching us the lessons of rugged individualism. Please don't force us into learning how to "live free like you do in CA." :-)

Total per capita FEDERAL welfare spending--
From http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2009/04/per-capita-federal-welfare-expenditures.html
stevep

Boulder climber
Salt Lake, UT
Nov 16, 2010 - 01:42pm PT
Welfare spending is only a drop in the bucket of total federal spending Jennie. Let's look at the whole picture:
Federal spending per dollar of tax received rank:
Alaska: 3 ($1.84 received per dollar of tax paid)
MT: 11
ID: 20 ($1.21 received per dollar of tax paid)
WY: 23
CA: 43 ($0.78 recieved per dollar paid)

Sure looks to me like the Californians are subisidizing you guys.
Source - http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/266.html

Or try page xxii of the Consolidated Federal Funds report for similar data - http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/cffr-08.pdf

edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 16, 2010 - 03:51pm PT
For the slower-minded folk wishing to engage me and reveal my top-secret "bat identity" : http://www.supertopo.com/climbing/thread.php?topic_id=1161313&tn=20


Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 16, 2010 - 04:25pm PT
I can't take this any more! In the interest of full disclosure, even though it's been told before;
Mojede = Elvis
AC = Batman
Rox = Ev Mecahm (yes, the former governor, makes it hard to get a job...) get back to us when you read the link you sited. Oh and I need a reliable car for my daughter...
Hawkeye = D.B. Cooper, he can afford to keep Rox on the payroll, behind the scenes.

Keep this in mind as you read these posts!
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 04:29pm PT
ok, (this kills me too RJ) but did you guys throwing out those statistics read what he posted?

Statistics manipulated like you guys are doing is a poor use of the art... a low population biases them quite dramatically when you consider the largest landholder in the State here is the Federal government, BY FAR, and they pay almost nothing for their HUGE Naval and Air Force bases and bombing ranges; and the Atomic Energy Labs they maintain here.

throw in power generation, etc. My guess is that you get a fair amount from WA and possibly OR.

EDIT:

jaybro that jump out of the plane into the night was awesome....


Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 16, 2010 - 04:39pm PT
And Cali has NO claim to being self sufficient in many things. Much of their water was/is stolen from other states, much of their electricity comes from outside their boundaries,

ok, last night i thought it was ironic to have an extinct bear on the flag, but hey, i bet some californians actually feel bad about that....and i dont want to beat up on californians today. but RJ did bring up an interesting point.

the point is that if large communities/counties/states (hard to decide where to divide) have to deal with your own stuff eg: Water, Sewage, Trash, Power Generation, etc. i think people would have more of an idea about the impacts of these services and the benefits.

i found it interesting that power from Grand Coulee Damn is not green in WA as it kills salmon, but is green energy in CA....WTF? (again not beating up on Cali).

people do not have an appreciation for a lot of utilities that then have impacts (pollution, waste, etc.)

alright sorry for the thread drift....
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 16, 2010 - 05:04pm PT
Nobody can tuck and roll like you, Hawk, though i'm sure that much cash serves as an airbag.

And yes, bring back the bear!
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 16, 2010 - 05:56pm PT
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 16, 2010 - 07:09pm PT
Again, I return from doing something useful to find that AC is still out monopolizing the thread by his very clever techniques of flippantly brushing aside a valid response, and posing another ridiculous question as his response. This thread has run its course.

AC-Don't you have a job? Are you just a welfare recipient with nothing better to do than ignore what you don't like and keep poking the hornet's nest with your own smug rejoinders? you need to pull your head out of your A$$ and get a life. Those of us who do have something "better to do" are tired to death of your endless, self-gratifying tirades.

I CAN terminate this thread anytime I so desire as the OP.
drljefe

climber
El Presidio San Augustin del Tucson
Nov 16, 2010 - 07:14pm PT
The infamous California Wolf.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 16, 2010 - 07:38pm PT
Sadly, the dire Wolf, Especially that one, truly is, extinct!
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 17, 2010 - 04:15pm PT
we all got Germs....
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Nov 17, 2010 - 04:47pm PT
If your DOG finds a turd, and sniffs it, HE will get the parasite, and BRING IT HOME TO YOU.

Do you have any links to cases like this?

or any other cases involving a wolf passing a disease to a human in a manner other than a bite?

Thanks
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 17, 2010 - 04:49pm PT
Rox, are you honestly purporting on purpose, and in public, that there is a "huge epidemic" spread by wolves, of all things?

That is one ambitious troll! Imaginative, though.

Now, post overwhelming verbiage that no one will ever read.
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Nov 17, 2010 - 05:08pm PT
I did read a bit, and looks like cases do exist, but are isolated and don't spread...no cases of 'epidemics' found...
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Nov 17, 2010 - 05:30pm PT
its like brucellosis in bison...any excuse to kill whats undomesticated and wild..ranchers are, after all, the original "stewards" of the land. before them, only heathen injuns roamed the west, and for crissakes, they weren't making an money doing that. its kind of like west nile virus. everyone was going to catch it, but in the end, well, a whole lot of nothing.
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Nov 17, 2010 - 05:36pm PT
what's a wolfes?
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Nov 17, 2010 - 05:48pm PT
If you CATCH an animal CURRENTLY attacking a domestic animal on private property you may shoot to kill, but if you miss, and it runs, you aren't supposed to kill it.

This is false, at least in Montana.
Read some of these reports for examples:
http://fwp.mt.gov/wildthings/management/wolf/wolfWeekly2010.html

quick example
On 10/15, WS killed a wolf near Hall (near Drummond), as previously authorized by FWP after WS
confirmed a cow was killed on private land during an investigation on 10/11. Efforts to remove the
remaining wolves are ongoing.


John_Box

Ice climber
Bellingham
Nov 17, 2010 - 05:51pm PT
OK, I normally don't get involved in these, but one question and an opinion, solely looking at one aspect of this. If wolves are such a threat to elk population, how have the populations coexisted, and both survived up to this point? It seems to me that crashing elk populations may be due to a return to previous population levels before the elimination of wolves across the west.
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Nov 17, 2010 - 06:04pm PT
These new animals also outweigh our native species by a bunch.

This is also false...you have wrote 150 pounds on here a couple times...not the case.


Actual wolf weights often skimpier than hunters estimate

Adult females averaged 86 pounds, according to Idaho Department of Fish and Game officials, who also included the weights of wolves struck by vehicles in the survey. For adult males, 101 pounds was the average.


Stats from the 2009 Montana Wolf hunt:
General age classification:
· 22 juveniles; 31% of total harvest
· 22 yearlings; 31% of total harvest
· 27 adults; 38% of total harvest
· 1 unknown
Weights:
· Juveniles weighed 62 pounds on average. Yearlings weighed about 80 pounds. Adults weighed
97 pounds. One wolf weighed 117 pounds.
Sex of harvest:
· A total of 41 males and 31 females were harvested.


from:
http://fwpiis.mt.gov/content/getItem.aspx?id=41454



EDIT: you then respond:
Edit: The WILDLIFE SERVICE (WS) is allowed to pursue and kill problem animals. Ranchers and other civilians are NOT.
False again...read the reports. I actually know ranchers who have been authorized...
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Nov 17, 2010 - 06:17pm PT
I like how you keep redefining your response...you can't just admit you were misinformed? Not the same thing, you were wrong and spouting off...



Animals killed on roads by cars do not a random statistically valid sample make of perhaps healthier animals in the brush.

I posted two sources. One from Idaho(which include the roadkills) and one from the 2009 Montana Wolf hunt, a sample size of ~72
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Nov 17, 2010 - 06:28pm PT
As of Dec. 31, 2009, FWP documented at least 524 wolves in 101 verified packs

from:
http://fwpiis.mt.gov/content/getItem.aspx?id=42353

That would be ~5.18 wolves per pack on average.


The photo of the pack above is either an anomaly or photoshop, and if that pack truly is that size, I have no doubt it is being reduced by FWP.

What the source of the photo?


EDIT: as for the other photo, I too got it in an email...it said 127 lbs in the email...but I yet to find anything other than that email as a source...you'd think The Idaho FWP would have it mentioned somewhere, as the weight would be a record according to them.
Captain...or Skully

Big Wall climber
leading the away team, but not in a red shirt!
Nov 17, 2010 - 06:38pm PT
Give it up, Tom...That one ain't worth your time or effort.
We that know the truth will abide. Eff the rest.
It's not like there's a lotta wolves on the Boise Bench anyway. Misinformation meister will just spew you down.
Captain...or Skully

Big Wall climber
leading the away team, but not in a red shirt!
Nov 17, 2010 - 06:42pm PT
FOAD. What's your problem, Dickhead?
Please die now. you're wasting valuable oxygen.
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Nov 17, 2010 - 06:54pm PT
Yeah, just wanted to correct a couple points...not that many folks take RJ seriously, but some of his misconceptions (like the weight issue) are somewhat common...


here's a good link about the tapeworm issue BTW:
http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/cms/wildlife/manage_issues/echinococcus.cfm

Where the parasite is found in wolves and wild ungulates, most wildlife management and public health agencies acknowledge the presence of the parasite, but consider the public health significance to be low.



Average pack size in ID is ~8
from:
http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/cms/wildlife/wolves/living/glance.cfm



Stay classy rocky!
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Nov 17, 2010 - 07:18pm PT
I think 100 lbs(on average) vs 150 pounds is a bit more than 18%...

The 127 pounder is UNCONFIRMED, and even if proven to be true, it would still be an ANOMALY...

EDIT: judging by your post below you don't understand the difference between AVERAGE and RECORD
BASE104

climber
An Oil Field
Nov 17, 2010 - 07:25pm PT
I have seen that picture of the lady holding the wolf floating around the web for a while. I don't think it is either real or proportional. I've seen a lot of wolves, both in Montana and Alaska, and they aren't that big.

The thing wolves do have is big feet and super long legs. So they can run down anything on Earth in the snow.

If you are going to post things, make sure the facts are straight. Even if they don't go in your direction of argument.

I have posted my opinions previously. I love wolves more than any other animal, and I have been in wolf turf a hell of a lot (Brooks Range).

But people won't tolerate them.

My solution? Cut down every damn fence. Reintroduce buffalo and all that, and all will be good. Or kill everything that eats what we eat, plant one species of crop, and just have zoos.

Go back to being hunter gatherers. The world has gone downhill ever since we started farming.
xtrmecat

Big Wall climber
Kalispell, Montanagonia
Nov 17, 2010 - 07:45pm PT
You folks crack me up sometime. So out of touch with reality, only believing what you are told, and so on and so forth.

I frequent the ground this happened on. It would be stupid(not risky, or scary, but stupid) to go there unarmed, We have meat eaters out here. To assume that these relocated wolves won't attack a man is just ignorant. To think these two were doing anything wrong or out of the ordinary for here is just as ignorant.

I gather my meat for the year by hunting, alone, in these same woods. It is a way of life I have always enjoyed. The people who talk about it and write about it, and tout they are athorities on the subject, well they aren't out there. I never see them, meet them, or even know anyone who has. The truth is we have a serious wolf problem here, and it has devastated many things, hunting just being a small part of it. A lot of us are waiting for the first human fatality to occur here, yes it really happens, and it isn't really to far off. Then you may get a semi impartial view into what it is really like here. That will sell some newspapers, and you won't need to wait too long either.

Any doubters, I will personally pick you up at the airport, and take you to any of a hundred venues, and introduce you to reality, Montana wolf style. Just pay the gas, and we can scare us for up to four days at a stretch.

Cosmic, you have always made me laugh, being a little out there and all, but you have no idea how far out there you are on this topic.

Burly Bob


edited to add, the cosmic comment was for his posts on the first three or so pages, there was no way I could read all 400 posts before comment on the silliness I was reading begged to be answered.
ontheedgeandscaredtodeath

Trad climber
San Francisco, Ca
Nov 17, 2010 - 07:57pm PT
What I don't understand about these (frequent) wolf threads is what I am supposed to do about it. Got a wolf problem? Write your congressman or shoot them or whatever.

In evil Cali the (federally protected) shark population is on the increase and there was a recent fatality. Amount of complaining about sharks I've heard? None. When there is a problem with mountain lions the local authorities often shoot them.
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Nov 17, 2010 - 08:48pm PT
it would be funnier if the wolf was holdin the woman in said picture, all arms a danglin' and such...the wolf with a big grin on its face...thank GUD the soccer mom's are all protected an such!!1111
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 17, 2010 - 08:49pm PT
Base 104-

Buffalo roaming brings to mind a very romantic, La La land fantasy...I've lived with the damned things roaming my neighborhood; I've even had one bed down blocking my driveway. Unless they are certified Brucellosis Free, no state is ever going to let them run wild again.

American agriculture is unparallaled in it's ability to feed huge numbers of people--all at reasonable costs, too. All these misty-eyed fantasies are ill-advised; ask the average housewife if she'd like $6.00/pound hamburger to feed a family of 4 or 5. Not! That would be the net result of, once again, "having the buffalo roam."

donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Nov 17, 2010 - 08:52pm PT
I agree with you Brokendown Climber but I also wish we had a different reality which included a lot more wildlife and a fraction of the 300 plus million homo sapiens we are "blessed" with.
xtrmecat

Big Wall climber
Kalispell, Montanagonia
Nov 17, 2010 - 09:47pm PT
Base 104, your stories are touching. Misleading, but touching. You may have a false sense of no fear from a wolf, and we need people like you,








to make up the statics.

This isn't even close to a Yellowstone problem. You are the sort of people I am refering to. First, act like you know, and spread the ignorance to others. It almost worked for Tredwell, well not really.

If you think you can defend yourself with a stick, please take me up on my offer to take you out for some fun and frolic in these tame mountains we have. This I gotta see, heck, I'll even provide the stick.

It isn't an inconvenience problem, or less game to hunt. That is just the hype of the media and internet. This issue is way bigger than you could ever believe, not like a mountain lion eats a hiker or two.

They are listed as endangered, a tactic to sue to control all the land by the green thinking crowd. It's been this way for many years. It would be like you trying to clean up your seedier neighborhoods and eliminate gang shootings by shooting them yourselves. It won't pass the legal muster, nor would society approve, right or wrong. Don't claim to know something, and report it as fact, as some of us are saddled to some very big problems from just such behavior.

Burly Bob
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 17, 2010 - 10:19pm PT
I actually had fewer problems with the buffalo than I did with the A-hole that owned them and didn't feed them in wintertime.

The big bull buffalo blocking my driveway was named "Damian," by the way. The owner later on got pissed at him and simply shot him, which I thought was a travesty. The S.O.B. had a herd of 47 animals and was too effing lazy to take care of them, or even put up the hay on his own property so they could be fed properly in wintertime. Eventually he lost the ranch and was evicted--by none other than his OWN MOTHER! Justice was truly served there!
xtrmecat

Big Wall climber
Kalispell, Montanagonia
Nov 17, 2010 - 11:03pm PT
AC, it is a regular occurance to see, and need to defend yourself from wolves, if you frequent the same places I do, in the amount I do. I also see cats, and griz, but those only need a few precations to prevent a bad situation.

There are a lot of folks who are still claiming we Montanans are just a bunch of money sucking leaches on the system, teat I believe was the term, yet not one of the so called wolf fans wants to take me up on a free trip into the most wonderful place in the lower 48. I don't understand?????

Rox, if you could tone down about 99.5% you might be more effective. AC, you are nearly as bad. Please, come visit Jan, edejom, or me, and see for yourself. It doesn't strike you funny that people living with the problem, are trying to enlighten others on the issue, from others not faced with anything even remotely like the problem being discussed. Just a bunch of internet research and mudslinging?

I seriously would love to take a legislator or one of you, or any sort, green pro wolf advocate, for a walk in the wild. I would be nice, hospitable, and work my butt off to show them what it is they think they know. I'm pretty sure I can sway many attitudes with this method. You know, put ignorance to rest. I am sure it will never come to be, as people like to bitch and whine, but really don't vest themselves in an issue. We on the other hand, are not only vested, but it is thrust upon us.

Don't kid yourselves into thinking the Montana Fish and Game folks know any more than the normal misinformation either. I rarely see them in the field either.

Burly Bob


Afterthought add- Don't kid yourselve into thinking that many, many, many wolves are illegally killed and not discussed. And the problem is still getting worse. Hmmmm.
xtrmecat

Big Wall climber
Kalispell, Montanagonia
Nov 17, 2010 - 11:12pm PT
Base104, I did not call you a Tredwell. I didn't even mean to connect you personally to the thought, just the general nay sayers. I was mearly pointing out the line of thinking I am seeing from some here is parallel. Sheesh, I am not even trying to comment on you personally beyond your seemingly casual attitude of the wolf.

DO NOT TAKE ME PERSONALLY< PLEASE.

Burly Bob
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 18, 2010 - 12:31am PT
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 18, 2010 - 12:32am PT
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 18, 2010 - 12:37am PT
Fritz

Trad climber
Hagerman, ID
Nov 18, 2010 - 12:38am PT
I really hate to step into this morass of a thread---but I have some different stories.

Growing up in Central Idaho during the 1950’s and 60’s: there were no predators bigger than a Badger to fear.

Badgers never figured out that “Whitey” (that’s us folks) was the predator to run from-----I was rushed several times by badgers while I was “packing heat” and I could never do anything but outrun the damn things. (Those of you who laugh, have not had a Badger attack you: hissing and growling.)
So----other than Badgers and the occasional rabid creature, in Idaho: “Whitey” was the supreme and feared predator.

In the early 90’s we gave some beers to a couple Forest Service Wilderness Rangers that visited our camp on a Middle Fork Salmon float- trip. One had been stalked by a cougar. He nervously told us that he: “felt just like a mouse might feel with a house cat.”

He bounced a rock off the adolescent cougar’s nose and escaped.

Around 2000, black bear attacks in the Frank Church Wilderness in central Idaho started getting serious.

Here is the scariest published story to date: http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1129&dat=20020725&id=D4kNAAAAIBAJ&sjid=RnADAAAAIBAJ&pg=5001,3730836

There are no wolf-human attacks yet, but people are being cautioned not to take dogs into the mountains, for fear of inciting attacks.

I’ve been carrying Pepper-spray for daytime and large caliber pistols for night-use since about 2000. That big flash-boom does light up the night-------and tends to scare stuff away.


It is not the “good old days for Whitey” in the mountains of Idaho anymore.

When I read Base104's posts: I realize he is talking wild Alaska truth.

In the 70's and 80's my friends that wanted "wild, dangerous, and unspoiled" moved to Alaska.

Idaho was not: "dangerous and unspoiled" from about 1900 to now. Why the hell should I want it to go back to "dangerous" to make a few outsiders quiver in joy?

Push us and you will find we locals believe in: The 3-S’s------“Shoot, Shovel, & Shut Up.”

Oh! By the way. I'm a liberal tree-hugger. (by Idaho standards)


atchafalaya

climber
Babylon
Nov 18, 2010 - 01:11am PT
Base, cool photos and posts.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 18, 2010 - 01:12am PT
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 18, 2010 - 01:13am PT
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 18, 2010 - 01:14am PT
Captain...or Skully

Big Wall climber
leading the away team, but not in a red shirt!
Nov 18, 2010 - 01:15am PT
Good stuff, Base104.

We're doomed, man. We're ALL gonna DIE!
Other than that, everything's normal. Oh, yeah, that's normal, too.






Carry on.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 18, 2010 - 01:19am PT
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 18, 2010 - 01:21am PT
rox

whose post or link says that they are threatened by wolves at home? just curious....

Captain...or Skully

Big Wall climber
leading the away team, but not in a red shirt!
Nov 18, 2010 - 01:48am PT
Yargle bargle?
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Nov 18, 2010 - 01:56am PT
CMac needs to start putting out Cliff Notes to these serial killer threads
for us slow readers to keep up. I'm starting to get my 'missles' and wolves mixed up!
Captain...or Skully

Big Wall climber
leading the away team, but not in a red shirt!
Nov 18, 2010 - 01:59am PT
Dude, the wolves fired a missile at the Ark on the Moon. I think it's the Commies fault. Or Dead Cats. Or pirates. Or Fattrad's.
Freaky, huh?
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Nov 18, 2010 - 02:02am PT
I'm so gonna PM Dr Sprock to get this all cleared up!
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 18, 2010 - 05:09am PT
The photo of the pack above is either an anomaly or photoshop, and if that pack truly is that size, I have no doubt it is being reduced by FWP.


Wolf packs up to thirty members are unusual …but not rare. An alpha female’s annual litter may be six to eight (or more) pups. The alpha pair will ordinarily mate exclusively with each other so long as they both remain alphas. There are times when one of the alphas will attempt to mate with a subordinate wolf, and if the other alpha is unable to prevent it …multiple litters can be born in one year.

This occurs mostly in large packs with plenty of available prey.

Larger packs with many young members coming into maturity will break up and disperse without interference from FWS. Dominance fighting is more common in the spring months, when mating occurs. Alpha wolves may be killed or driven away when other members turn against them. Pack size is in wide flux at that time of year.

Angus Theurmer,of Jackson Hole News, who occasionally posts as “Anguish” on ST, recently reported on a new 22 member pack in Gros Ventre range SE of Jackson Hole.

Canis Lupus Occidentalis subspecies pack sizes are generally 6–12 wolves, with some packs as large as 20–30. Territory size averages 600 square miles (1,600 km2). Wolf packs in Yellowstone average 9.2 adult wolves with an average territory of 348-square-mile (900 km2), while wolf packs in Idaho average 11.1 adults and 364-square-mile (940 km2) territories.

--- From: International Wolf Center

Average pack size is five to six wolves for the Canis Lupus Nubilus subspecies

International Wolf Center. Wolves Around the World: 1997 Update. Ely, MN: International Wolf Center; 1996.




EDIT: In 2001, there existed a 37 member pack (Mackenzie Valley subspecies) in Yellowstone...according to SPECIES ASSESSMENT FOR GRAY WOLF IN WYOMING, Carron Meaney, and DR. Gary P. Beauvais.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 18, 2010 - 05:15am PT
Good for them!
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 18, 2010 - 05:17am PT
EDIT: as for the other photo, I too got it in an email...it said 127 lbs in the email...but I yet to find anything other than that email as a source...you'd think The Idaho FWP would have it mentioned somewhere, as the weight would be a record according to them.


Other photos of the Colson Creek wolf can be seen on several internet sites, for members not offended or upset by pics of slain animals. Here are two:

http://dalesdesigns.net/wolf2.htm
http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f22/woofs-colson-creek-north-fork-salmon-63541/

The Colson Creek incident received some coverage in eastern Idaho papers…I don’t believe it was a hoax with altered photos. As Idaho Fish and Game investigated the incident, any exaggerating the weight and size of the animal could be called into question. Some Hunting and Fishing stories invite cynical scrutiny but a bona fide animal cadaver is cause for serious investigation. It was a collared animal so I presume the FWS examined and probably weighed the remains.


Canis Lupus Occidentalis males typically weigh between 100 and 145 pounds (45–65 kg). Only the Artic Wolves (Canis Lupus Arctos) are larger.

^ http://www.forwolves.org/ralph/wpages/1996idahowolves.htm


Canis Lupus Nubilus, also known as the Buffalo wolf, males weigh from 60 to 110 pounds.

---International Wolf Center. Wolves Around the World: 1997 Update. Ely, MN: International Wolf Center; 1996.
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Nov 18, 2010 - 11:24am PT
Now everybody in Idaho and Montana hates environmentalists. Or a lot of them.

One could certainly add Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico to this list, probably Utah as well.

In the long run, this may be one of the worst legacies of the wolf fiasco. By so over doing it with false information and end runs around state authorities, the word "environmentalist" has pretty much become a swear word in the mountain states.

This is truly a shame as more and more scientific knowledge and management will be required as the human population of the West continues to grow. Just when an environmental philosophy is needed most, it has been tainted by the radicals in the movement.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 18, 2010 - 11:41am PT
From the comments embedded in one of the responses on Jennie's link re: longrange hunting, the problem has now spilled over into Oregon.

Yummy! Lotsa' sheep in Oregon!
atchafalaya

climber
Babylon
Nov 18, 2010 - 04:42pm PT


"If I don't eventually see blood on the floor over this bullsh#t, and LAWS to prevent this from ever happening again, I will be completely dis-illusioned in any belief in the Federal Government, the courts, and the ability of good people to be allowed to control their lives, safe from the manipulations of big business and Big Government."

Prepare to be further "dis-illusioned". Can I become an expert on wolves if I move to idaho and search the internet for information on wolves?


Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 18, 2010 - 11:57pm PT
AC
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blahblah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,blah, blah, blah, blah, blah blah, blah....

RJ, i really think that this time you have been way too insulting to another st poster.....afterall, this was AC's most valuable post on the entire thread.


Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 19, 2010 - 12:11am PT
frankly rj, now you are throwing him too much credit!

i said early in this thread that this was a battle of special interests. i see little need to protect the wolf as an endangered species. they are smart, travel far and wide, multiply readily and need little "help" from us. that might help to control their population in a more cost effective manner than paying thousands for wolf to get the bad ones. i like wolves, i loved hearing them close to my camp in Northern ID, WA and BC.

i still havent heard about the hypocracy of people from cali that fly the flag of and extinct species telling other states how to manage their wildlife....

Fritz

Trad climber
Hagerman, ID
Nov 19, 2010 - 12:35am PT
I really respect and love California!

Idaho capitalists make a lot of money from sending California: Electricity, Potatoes, "Fresh Idaho Trout", and many other agricultural and mineral resources.


I always cherish the 19th century slogan about Californians.

“The miners came in 49, the whores in 51. When they got together: they made a Native Son."
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 19, 2010 - 02:52am PT
i have nothing sincerely against CA. frankly, they are ahead of the curve with regards to populaiton growth vs wilderness interactions. those of us in less populated states should learn from their own tribulations.

and they should not expect us outside of CA to protect things that they are sorry about. but each of us must weigh the reality of all human life against our values and make the right choices.

edit:

but i have FUN giving them sh#t....
corniss chopper

Mountain climber
san jose, ca
Nov 19, 2010 - 02:59am PT
I think its good riddance to the CA griz. That we have 'it' on the flag
serves as a reminder of what people do to dangerous critters is a sly joke
that goes over some peoples heads.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 19, 2010 - 03:06am PT
AC i assume your comment was that you and CC are related?
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 19, 2010 - 03:08am PT
ac, face it. more populated areas rely on less populated areas to save big city dwellers a piece of nature cuz those big city dudes used all of thiers up.

point is, life is a balance.....
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 19, 2010 - 03:17am PT
keep your self portraits to yourself there good buddy....
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 19, 2010 - 03:29am PT
AC,

your baby pic says a lot!!!

nice one brah!
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 19, 2010 - 03:43am PT
Those are pretty embarrassingly stupid things to have said out loud...
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Nov 19, 2010 - 03:54am PT
Well then I might as well put in one of my favorites from another wolf thread.

"We don't want wolves up here and
Idaho is not California's poodle".
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 19, 2010 - 09:43am PT
Ripped from the mornings' head-line in the Montana Standard




Montana asks feds for limited wolf hunt


HELENA - The state Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission will ask the federal government for a permit that would allow a limited wolf hunt in southwest Montana because of the threat to the elk population there.

A federal judge reinstated endangered species protections for the gray wolf in Montana and Idaho this summer, but the state wildlife agency can ask for such a hunt in small areas where wolves are deemed an experimental species, such as the West Fork of the Bitterroot River.
The agency proposes to shoot 12 of the estimated 24 wolves in that area south of Darby. The state agency would choose 100 "agents of the state" from a pool of hunters who apply.
The wolves preying on elk calves in the region have contributed to a dangerously low ratio of calves to cows, wildlife officials said.

Before 2007, there were at least 25 calves per 100 cows. Over the last two years, the average has been 10 calves per 100 cows, said Mike Thompson, FWP regional wildlife manager for the Bitterroot area."We feel it's something we can't ignore," Thompson said. "Those numbers won't sustain a population over time."

The FWP commission approved the proposal on Thursday. It will send a permit application to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that includes with 162 public comments and five "peer reviews" of the proposal prepared by experts in Alaska, Michigan and Minnesota.
FWP wildlife chief Ken McDonald said his agency has received comments both for and against the proposal. Those who were against generally said they were concerned about killing wolves to benefit elk and hunters, or else they believed that wolf control wouldn't stop elk numbers from declining.

McDonald said it could take six months or longer for the Fish and Wildlife Service to approve or reject the application for a permit.
Idaho has applied for a similar permit to reduce the wolf population in the Lolo area just across the Continental Divide, but federal officials have told them the application must first go through a lengthy environmental assessment through the National Environmental Policy Act process, McDonald said.The same is likely to happen with Montana's application, he said.
That would mean a hunt is not likely to take place until next winter. The proposal had originally called for a hunt at the beginning of 2011.

Federal officials have already denied a previous Montana request for a much larger "conservation hunt" of gray wolves in response to increasing attacks on livestock and elk.
The number of wolves has skyrocketed since 66 wolves were brought from Canada to central Idaho and Yellowstone National Park. The population hit the original recovery benchmark of 300 animals a decade ago and at least 1,700 wolves now roam parts of six states.

The Fish and Wildlife Service turned wolf management over to Montana and Idaho last year while leaving endangered species protections for wolves Wyoming because of that state's "shoot on sight" policy for wolves outside the Yellowstone National Park area.
A federal judge this summer ruled the species could not be divided along political lines and restored endangered species protections in Montana and Idaho.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 19, 2010 - 10:03am PT
"Or shoot em yourself, mano y wolf pack.

Man up MONTANA!"--Dingus







Looks like from the article that's what we're trying to do--if the mighty Fed powers allow us to do so...



...tell the "Cali-ban" eco-terrorist groups to stop pressuring them, so we can also.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Nov 19, 2010 - 10:47am PT
I'm with you on that opinion, Dingus--sounds reasonable.
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 19, 2010 - 09:41pm PT
Welfare spending is only a drop in the bucket of total federal spending Jennie. Let's look at the whole picture:
Federal spending per dollar of tax received rank:
Alaska: 3 ($1.84 received per dollar of tax paid)
MT: 11
ID: 20 ($1.21 received per dollar of tax paid)
WY: 23
CA: 43 ($0.78 recieved per dollar paid)


Yes, Stevep, lets consider the whole picture.

A huge portion of the whole picture of federal spending is funding for Social Security, federal pensions, disability etc. According to your source, California received $81,796,321,000 funding last year for those programs...Idaho received $4,373,079,000. Dividing these expenditures by the respective populations of CA and ID we get per capita retirement, pensions and disability payments of $2,198 for California and $2,829 for Idaho.

Unfair?

Idaho is the fifth fasteth growing state with a population boom of 55% in 26 years. Many of these are older people who relocate to Idaho for it's lower cost of living. (Some move to get away from gangs, crime. bad air etc.) Should they be entitled to Social Security, government pensions, Medicare if they worked and paid taxes, most of their lives, in another state, but moved to Idaho in their senior years?

The disparity in federal retirement spending between California and Idaho suggests, rather strongly, that there is a larger per capita exodus of seniors to Idaho than California. The state of California ranks 48th in per capita federal retirement and disability payments. Where are CA seniors going?

We see housing going up around Rexburg, Idaho Falls and Pocatello being filled by transplants from the west coast...and Californians buying rural Idaho land and building mansions...and Idaho retirement centers with significant ex-Calfornia occupants.

...we hear similar news from Montana residents.

Sure looks to me like the Californians are subisidizing you guys.


Require seniors to forfeit their Social Security, Medicare and government service pensions if they relocate to another state or require them to collect these entitlements in the states in which they paid in, Steve... and this so-called "subsidization" of Idaho will quickly deflate.



 http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/266.html
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 19, 2010 - 09:50pm PT
How did this wolf thread, that has nothing to do with the golden state, get strawmaned by a Bitter, drunken redneck ex pat, into an anti-Cali thread?

Party on Lance!
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 19, 2010 - 09:54pm PT
Anti California thread?

I could have sworn it was anti-Idaho!
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 19, 2010 - 10:00pm PT
OK to return to your quip - Montana is the 7th Sucker on the Federal Teat list - raking in $1.64 for every $1.00 paid out in Federal taxes.

So stop your bellyaching that your financial masters are exerting control over THEIR LAND. Yall free and independent cowboys, miners and hunters have been at the teat so long ya done forgot who pays your bills!

Sheesh! Leave our wolves alone.

Or shoot em yourself, mano y wolf pack.

Man up MONTANA!

DMT

whooooooaaaaaaaaaaaa pardner!!!!!!!


take some political math classes........its called take the statistics you want to prove the point you want. can CA survive without other states help in terms of energy and water? i doubt it. you guys are screwed! besides you are the GOLDEN state. WTF do u care about woves in montana???and WHY??? i dont f*#king get it?!?!?





Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 19, 2010 - 10:03pm PT
From my lips to their ears.

I have zero respect for any wolf hunting involving choppers, dogs, poison or groups of hunters pursuing the same target.

I would totally respect a rancher who went and settled her own business, however. Should that ever happen, that is.

DMT

whoda thought there would be common cents from dmt???? dooooooooood, those folks in rural areas are so appreciative of your recommendation. damn we are excited now......
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 19, 2010 - 10:13pm PT
ac, you are a pissless mess designed to ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
FullMonty

Trad climber
On a big mountain in Colorado
Nov 19, 2010 - 10:16pm PT
Yep, thats how it works. When we shoot an Elk or Moose in the backcountry, it either gets hauled out that day, or hung somewhere (quarterd of course.)
I think its a good thing that humans are not the top of the food chain right now. We have lots of toys that make us seem pretty tough, but we have really little teeth.
I saw some fresh kitty tracks last week, and it really made me think about biking in that area again.
Thats how it should be.
When you play (or hunt) in the mountains, just know that you are not the big kid on the block anymore, and thats a good thing.
The original residents want their turf back.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 19, 2010 - 10:18pm PT
It's true!
-the following, in Bill Murray's ghostbusters voice.-
I've never seen AC piss!
corniss chopper

Mountain climber
san jose, ca
Dec 8, 2010 - 10:43pm PT
Buster, our 15-year-old beagle, was dragged into woods by wolves.

http://www.adn.com/2010/11/07/1542141/bolder-wolves-fray-residents-nerves.html



State sends hunters after aggressive southwest wolves
http://www.adn.com/2010/12/08/1594715/aggressive-wolves-in-southwest.html
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Dec 22, 2010 - 03:14am PT
Group pushes for nationwide wolf restoration

By MATTHEW BROWN, Associated Press
Tue Dec 21, 8:01 pm ET

BILLINGS, Mont. – Environmentalists said Tuesday they intend to sue the
Obama administration to force it to restore gray wolves across the lower 48
states— even as Republicans in Congress sought unsuccessfully to strip the
animals of protection.

The Center for Biological Diversity said in a formal notice to the Interior
Department that it will sue the agency in 60 days unless the government
crafts a plan to bring back wolves throughout their historical range.

"Wolves once roamed nearly the whole country and down into Mexico, but at
this point there just in a fraction of that range," said Noah Greenwald,
director of endangered species for the Center for Biological Diversity.

About 6,000 wolves live in the lower 48 states. They are protected from
hunting except in Alaska.

Biologists for the Arizona-based group argue there is enough wild habitat to
support thousands of wolves in New England and New York, the southern
Rocky Mountains, parts of Colorado and the Cascade Range of Oregon and
Washington.

But prospects for new wolf packs in other parts of the country are uncertain
at best, given how polarized the debate over wolves has become in recent
months.

Like the Bush administration, the Obama administration has pushed to end
federal protections for wolves and turn control over the animals over to
states. Lawmakers from states where wolves already roam say there are too
many of the predators.

On Tuesday, Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, tried to force a full Senate vote on a
bill to strip wolves nationwide of federal protections.

The measure was backed by Republicans in Wyoming and Utah, but failed in
the face of Democratic objections.

Wolves were poisoned and trapped to near-extermination in the United States
in the last century. They have bounced back in some wilderness areas over
the last few decades, in part through government-sponsored reintroduction
programs.

Crapo said the growing population of wolves in the Northern Rockies —
more than 1,700 at the end of 2009 — was harming big game herds and
domestic
livestock.

"The longer we wait to resolve this issue, the more difficult it's going to be,"
he said.

But Sen. Benjamin Cardin, a Maryland Democrat, said the Republican bill
would undermine the Endangered Species Act. He criticized what he called
an attempt "to solve politically what should be done by good science."

Cardin suggested he would support a compromise pushed by Montana
lawmakers and the administration that would limit the scope of the bill to
include only wolves in the Northern Rockies.

Crapo said that proposal was unacceptable because it would have forced
Idaho to change the way it manages the animals.

Public hunts for wolves were allowed briefly in Montana, Idaho and
Wyoming in recent years. Those were halted after the federal government
was rebuffed by the courts in several attempts to take the animal off the
endangered list.

Judges have ruled that the government has not proved existing wolf
numbers would ensure the population's long-term survival.

Wolves are notorious predators. Experts say they could survive in most of
the country if they were allowed. But a hunger for livestock often gets the
animals into trouble, particularly in the Northern Rockies where ranches
and wolf territories often overlap.

Young adult wolves sometimes travel hundreds of miles when looking to
establish a new territory. In the last several years, packs have gained a
toehold in parts of Oregon and Washington. Others have been spotted
in Colorado, Utah and northern New England.

"We've learned from where wolves have been reintroduced that they
have a tremendous benefit," Greenwald, of the Center for Biological
Diversity, said. "They force elk to move around more, which allows
riparian vegetation to come back and increases songbirds, and they
control coyote populations."

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is currently analyzing research into wolf
genetics to see how populations in different parts of the country relate
to one another.

Agency spokesman Chris Tollefson on Tuesday said the effort is not part
of a nationwide recovery plan, but declined to say if it could be used for
such an effort in the future.

He said results of the agency's work are expected in early 2011.

"It's designed to establish the best scientific foundation to make future
management decisions about wolves. That's about all I can say about
it at this point," Tollefson said.
__
Matthew Daly contributed to this story from Washington, D.C.
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Dec 22, 2010 - 03:41am PT
Take away that (Billings, MT) by-line from there and it might hold salt--trust me on this; NOT the way the majority of Montanans think about wolves around here (wolf country).
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 22, 2010 - 09:05am PT
Sounds as though Rox and I will need to take some wolves back to Maryland!! That's THEIR Senator asking for them!!
edejom

Boulder climber
Butte, America
Dec 22, 2010 - 08:38pm PT
Not afraid of spotted knapweed either, sure as hill don't want that in my backyard too...
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Feb 1, 2011 - 07:26pm PT
they are coming your way AC!

http://www.eastoregonian.com/news/local_news/article_90bc3ea6-2e31-11e0-9f43-001cc4c002e0.html


wolf packs in Oregon....Rox you will soon be surrounded!wolves to the left! wolves to the right! wolves to the North!


i used to think that they needed protection but not anymore. have an open hunting season




BTW, those hunters were all dwarves making those wolves look bigger!
TKingsbury

Trad climber
MT
Feb 1, 2011 - 07:43pm PT
I talked to my buddy an hour east recently and I asked how his hunting season went. He told me he had the best hunt in years. 4 elk and a whitetail...

I asked him about the wolves and elk herd sizes...he laughed and said something about lazy hunters eating weak and diseased elk...and that they should just learn to hunt...not sit in there rigs on a ranch waiting for a herd...

Anecdotal but interesting...wouldn't mind seeing numbers on tags issued vs elk harvested for this season though...
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Feb 1, 2011 - 11:05pm PT
Is your farm overrun with Turkeys and deer, like out here?

I've lived with wolves, I'd LOVE to have them here!

One of the first times, on one of my first backpack trips with my dad when I was 11 we hiked the length of Isly Royale NP in lake superior. This is an island 3 miles wide and 50 miles long, with an active population of Wolves and Moose, that depend on each other. We heard the wolves every night and every morning, an experience I'll always remember.

You know they're there, in your 'backyard' in Az? You might hear them, sometime, i have, there. Well, not right where you are.

Yes, please, re-introduce them in the Sierra!
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Feb 1, 2011 - 11:31pm PT
Never trust a fox to do a wolf's job?

Some places here in the golden state the turkeys are much like you describe with the rabbits, I always see them on the road to Gary Carpenter's house.

So, about the deer, Mtn Lions are at the top of their expansion phase of the pyramid, pretty much all over the west, right now. Is that not the case in Pa? Honest question, I really don't know.

Oh and the wolf howl is unique. If you're mindful at the time, you'll know it. Completely unlike sounds of dogs or coyotes. The coyotes' song is a treasure as well, though.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Feb 1, 2011 - 11:47pm PT
Maybe a job for big weasels, like martins or something...

There is one section of a trail tha tirun here that I see Coyotes, i assume the same ones, about one in ten runs. Some times they will trot along on the trail maybe only thirty or so feet ahead of me, looking over their shoulder regularly until they get to 'their exit.' Sometimes they run behind me or will just see on the hillside and watch. They keep their gaurd up, but don't seem especially concerned. Not like some middle aged geezer is gonna catch them in a sprint or anything.

I saw one pee on the gas pump that used to be by camp four once.


How about Canada geese? They can be problematic here. They take over public parks and leave feces the size that cats leave in their boxes. All over the place.
corniss chopper

climber
not my real name
Feb 2, 2011 - 01:14am PT
some history
Yellowstone NP back in the 1930's hired David Condon, who served as the 1st Chief Naturalist in the park. During the 1920's many predators
were hunted down and killed in the park as they were considered pests to the parks animals.

Wolves, lynx, Cougars, badgers, coyotes eliminated.

http://books.google.com/books?id=_mXHuSSbiGgC&pg=PA294&lpg=PA294&dq=yellowstone+NP+in+the+1930%27s++,US+biological+survey+,+eliminate+Wolves&source=bl&ots=cNi62qqZhb&sig=zP4wCDZhzWAtIV1YUbYUhgoAZDw&hl=en&ei=eO9ITb3HKojYgQeTq-WOBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false


The last Yellowstone female gray wolf. Her cubs were taken in and tourists were allowed to play with them for awhile. Then they were drowned.

The experts back them didn't know what they were doing and its
probable that today's are just as ignorant of our worlds complexity.
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Feb 2, 2011 - 02:02am PT
Dire wolves were.

Corn-ice, our tax dollars at work! Nowadays they just club them to death with $1200 toilet seats, recycling, as it were....
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Apr 17, 2011 - 03:36am PT

The beginning of the end is my guess.

Wolves to come off endangered list within 60 days


BILLINGS, Mont. – Federal wildlife officials say they will take more than 1,300 gray wolves in the Northern Rockies off the endangered species list within 60 days.
An attachment to the budget bill signed into law Friday by President Barack Obama strips protections from wolves in five Western states.

It marks the first time Congress has taken a species off the endangered list.
Idaho and Montana plan public wolf hunts this fall. Hunts last year were canceled after a judge ruled the predators remained at risk.

Protections remain in place for wolves in Wyoming because of its shoot-on-sight law for the predators.

There are no immediate plans to hunt the small wolf populations in Oregon and Washington. No packs have been established in Utah.


sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Apr 17, 2011 - 10:30am PT
Hopefully the can start shooting eagles too. I hear they carry off babies and sheep
golsen

Social climber
kennewick, wa
Apr 17, 2011 - 10:53am PT
AC

I don't believe wolves were ever native to the Sierra Nevada mountains.

That doesnt keep you from having your very own http://www.californiawolfcenter.org/
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Apr 17, 2011 - 11:30am PT
sandstone conglomerate. re
Hopefully the can start shooting eagles too. I hear they carry off babies and sheep


Nope we need those eagles. Not only do they take care of un-tended infants, but they really go after poodles.

What do you folks know about getting a tourist permit? I always see talk about tourist season, but I can't ever seem to buy a permit to shoot some.


Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 17, 2011 - 12:37pm PT
I had a good discussion re: rights of ranchers and wolves with the local game warden last week. Any predator harassing livestock may be shot on sight, but then the G & F needs to be notified for removal of the carcass.

Of the 2 wolves seen nearby earlier, one was definitely killed from a helicopter by a wildlife biologist and professional hunter/tracker. The other of the pair has been seen several times since, but has avoided capture or being shot.

I'm now in the process of eliminating many of the feral cats that folks from town bring out and "drop off." They are the destroyers of nests of ground-nesting game birds: turkeys, sage grouse, and hungarian partridges.
Srbphoto

climber
Kennewick wa
May 3, 2011 - 10:47pm PT
this just in...


[url="http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2011/05/03/1476207/wolves-feds-plan-to-kill-2-from.htmlhttp://"]http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2011/05/03/1476207/wolves-feds-plan-to-kill-2-from.htmlhttp://[/url]
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - May 3, 2011 - 11:15pm PT
Check your link typing. Couldn't bring it up.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
May 4, 2011 - 12:09am PT
Cattle Country- yeah for about 100 years. The ranchers in the west are more on the public dole than any so called "welfare mom" in an urban slum. We are supporting ranchers thru are tax dollars on public lands in their money loosing efforts to raise cattle on marginal land. More wolves and fewer ranchers would make the west a better place.
mojede

Trad climber
Butte, America
Nov 5, 2011 - 07:45pm PT
http://mtstandard.com/news/local/wolves-killed-as-of-monday/article_17b797d6-0459-11e1-830f-001cc4c002e0.html


Bump--for a good wolf hunting season so far, 44 bagged by the first of this month...
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Nov 5, 2011 - 09:57pm PT
The state of Montana has issued wolf hunting licenses this year sufficient to kill 25% of the wolf population. A fish and game official recently made this remark.


"In the long run, Montana's going to have an additional hunting tradition that we didn't have before."


http://mtstandard.com/news/local/wolves-killed-as-of-monday/article_17b797d6-0459-11e1-830f-001cc4c002e0.html#ixzz1cscuShaq


The backlash led some environmentalists to question their approach. “I personally look back and say there were a number of things that conservationists did that were not effective and which blew up on us,” said Lisa Upson, executive director of Keystone Conservation, a Montana-based nonprofit group that offers ranchers help with nonlethal control measures. “Now we have to live with this horrible precedent.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/05/science/earth/conflict-over-wolves-yields-new-dynamic-between-ranchers-and-conservationists.html?scp=2&sq=wolves&st=cse

It kind of reminds me of the old Vietnam War strategy of, "We had to destroy the village in order to save it" and we know how that worked out.

dirtbag

climber
Nov 5, 2011 - 09:59pm PT
They should be required to eat the wolves.
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Nov 5, 2011 - 10:01pm PT
let them be Real Men and kill the wolves with Bowie knives.
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Nov 6, 2011 - 06:07am PT
The size of the things is striking alright. Bigger than any other wolves I've seen.
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 6, 2011 - 08:00am PT
The paw on the wolf in the photo Rox posted.


These photos were published around the state and the event was investigated by Idaho Fish and Game. Apparently she didn't have a wolf tag.

Someone claims to have shot a 217 pound wolf near Hamilton, Montana. There is a photo on the internet. I don't know if Game authorities verified the weight.

I believe all dead wolves in Idaho are weighed. Fish and Game claims more immature wolves are taken because they are more curious than the fully adult pack members.
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Nov 6, 2011 - 08:41am PT
I hear that once the Injun population gets big enough again, they're going to be taken off the endangered species list...Some of them top out over 200, from what i've seen. Got a 4 incher for when that day comes.
Srbphoto

climber
Kennewick wa
Nov 6, 2011 - 12:05pm PT
Got a 4 incher for when that day comes


You gonna shoot the injun or make love to it?
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Nov 6, 2011 - 12:42pm PT
In search of a little hard data on the subject of wolves I went to the Idaho Fish & Game Dept. website.
http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/public/wildlife/wolves/

At the end of 2010 there were 109 packs of wolves living in or visiting Idaho. Estimated wolf population was 705.

The above chart shows confirmed livestock (not just rumored) wolf depradation in Idaho. I suspect the real total would be somewhat higher.


Year to date dead wolves from hunting in Idaho.

Seems to me: we have enough that we can share some wolves with California.

You are all invited: if you want to visit and take one, or several home.
(they are sooooooo cute and cuddily!)
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Nov 6, 2011 - 05:48pm PT
Fritz
Thanks for the data
approx 300 cattle, sheep and dogs killed by wolves per year (mostly sheep)
And in response we kill 1/6 of the total wolf population in 2011?
Do the wolves rear pups at the rate of 1 pup to 5 wolves to adulthood each year to keep the balance?
Seems like a helluva price to exact on a threatened population for 300 domestic livestock.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Nov 6, 2011 - 07:14pm PT
What I consider interesting about the Wolf Depredation statistics I posted: is the steep drop in livestock depredation in 2010 & 2011.

In 2009: the first hunting season since wolf reintroduction, 108 wolves were killed by 11/17.

By Judicial order there was no 2010 wolf hunting season in Idaho.

2011 wolf hunting season kills are 101 by 11/3.

This N.Y. Times 2009 article, has the Idaho wolf population at the end of 2008 at 850. As I mentioned previously: the wolf population here at the end of 2010 was estimated at 705.

The article also says this about wolf reintroduction:

The program was such a success that the wolf population in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming — about 1,650 at the end of 2008 — is now five times the goal set for reintroduction.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/11/us/11wolves.html

I remember a wolf biologist from Alaska stating that wolf harvest numbers here would drop steeply after hunting started, due to wolves changing their behavior around humans. Maybe with hunting season every-other year, wolves have not yet “wised-up” to hunting season.
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Nov 6, 2011 - 07:18pm PT
RJ, aren't those wolves descended from the "buffalo wolves" of Alberta? 200 lbs. seems mythical
Jaybro

Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
Nov 6, 2011 - 07:21pm PT
Go wolves! Livestock is a cancer that kills more people in a year than wolves have since the beginning of time.
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 6, 2011 - 10:15pm PT

I was the one who emailed that photo to Rokjox. It’s not a photoshoped image. The incident was investigated by State Fish and Game officers.

The photo is displayed on numerous websites.

KXLY-4 news did a news video about the incident:
http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2011/09/28/idaho-woman-attacked-by-wolf/
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Nov 6, 2011 - 10:35pm PT
Jennie: Thanks for the post & link. It took me a couple tries to get to the report by a Spokane WA TV station.

Here's the final link:
http://www.kxly.com/news/29468560/detail.html
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 6, 2011 - 10:46pm PT
Thanks Fritz, that's a better link to the video.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 6, 2011 - 11:16pm PT
That wolf probably outweighs even me!
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 7, 2011 - 01:39am PT
The introduced ( non-native) Mackenzie Valley subspecies of wolf has killed almost half of Yellowstone’s coyotes and over 70% of the elk population in the North Yellowstone herd to date.

This video of wolves killing a coyote is gruesome. Please use discretion in viewing or presenting it to children.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXCvLzDNWz0
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 7, 2011 - 01:56am PT
I nominate Jennie to star as Little Red Riding Hood. RokJox and friends can take turns being the Big Bad Wolf. Not sure who gets to be grandma - ideas? Not LEB.

300 domestic wildlife - mostly sheep and cattle - allegedly killed in Idaho each year by 700+ wolves? That is, ferocious bloodthirsty rampaging giant Canadian wolves? Even if the number was twice that, it's a miniscule percentage of the domestic livestock in Idaho, who as has been mentioned, are often subsidized and cause substantial environmental damage.

And despite your fantasies, they must be either very smart or very lame wolves. A kill rate of even one domestic animal per wolf per year, that is double the claimed one domestic animal/two wolves, isn't pretty pathetic. It would also be a trivial proportion of their total prey - how long would a sheep feed an adult wolf for? Maybe a week?

The wolves' depredations on coyotes were predictable, as the animals share a niche, and wolves are the alpha predator. Also due to the coyote population exploded over the last century, and the extermination of wolves.

As for the wolves' impacts on other animals, that was to be expected, as the restored ecosystem comes back into balance.
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Nov 7, 2011 - 02:00am PT
One of the things I find disturbing is all the California environmentalists who think of themselves as peaceful, maybe Buddhists and vegans even, and yet they seem oblivious to the reign of death and destruction they have wrought.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Nov 7, 2011 - 10:57am PT
Let's see wolves, Idaho ranchers....wolves, Idaho ranchers.....hmmm, well wolves where there first and (best yet) they can't vote.
Zander

climber
Nov 7, 2011 - 11:15am PT
This relates to this conversation.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/05/science/earth/conflict-over-wolves-yields-new-dynamic-between-ranchers-and-conservationists.html?emc=eta1
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Nov 7, 2011 - 11:21am PT
It's bad enough here in Sin City. I can't imagine how bad it is with real wolves.
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Nov 7, 2011 - 03:31pm PT
that coyote is really going to town on that pu.....
Well, I guess i better not type that.
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Nov 13, 2011 - 05:34pm PT
http://www.newsinenglish.no/2011/11/10/fewer-wolves-in-norway-more-in-sweden/
“This is blamed on politics, not biology,” Petter Wabakken, wolf researcher at the College of Hedmark, told Dagsavisen. Norway has set a ceiling of three wolf litters annually, largely because of constant resistance to wolves from Norway’s powerful farmers’ lobby, and that goal will likely be reached this year.
Norway's tiny wolf population is diminishing. Poaching and political pressure from farmers.
They're counting on Sweden to save the Scandinavian wolf population.
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 13, 2011 - 05:38pm PT
Sweden has a larger area, with lots of forest and lake country on its west side - good brown (grizzly) bear and wolf habitat. Norway has less room, and if there wasn't a healthy bear and wolf population in Sweden, they'd probably die out in Norway.

It's a bit like the residual grizzly and wolf population in the north Cascades, which are quite dependent on the Canadian side. Of course, human boundaries mean nothing to the animals, and the wolves all across the mountains of western North America are inter-related. Their behaviours and characteristics vary based on environment, but all can interbreed and produce fertile offspring. The myth of the giant ferocious Canadian wolf is just agitprop.
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Nov 13, 2011 - 05:49pm PT
MH
great clarification.
ms55401

Trad climber
minneapolis, mn
Nov 13, 2011 - 05:54pm PT
more wolves and pissed-off Idahoans?

win/win
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 14, 2011 - 11:46am PT
Well, the information that Fritz posted - from the Idaho Department of Fish & Game, hardly an objective source - is pretty definite that for all the allegations, wolves in Idaho don't actually kill many domestic animals.

http://www.supertopo.com/climbing/thread.php?topic_id=1317417&msg=1658849#msg1658849

(Jennie, Lance to now post "None is too many".)
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Nov 14, 2011 - 11:50am PT
agitprop
My new word of the month! I hadn't thought of it in years. Quite appropriate for some of the nonsense on the political threads.
Bread

Trad climber
Craggy Mountains, NC
Nov 14, 2011 - 11:56am PT
http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?s=22eee9324f6611a279dbe0376872b2d6&t=48318&page=2
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Nov 14, 2011 - 12:31pm PT
It appears we have a lack of fishermen on this thread, hence all the marveling about the "huge wolves."

Let me help you out.

I asked Heidi to pose with Ralph to illustrate Forced Perspective:

Forced perspective is a technique that employs optical illusion to make an object appear farther away, closer, larger or smaller than it actually is. It is used primarily in photography, filmmaking and architecture. It manipulates human visual perception through the use of scaled objects and the correlation between them and the vantage point of the spectator or camera.

Forced Perspective is frequently used by fishermen to "enhance" the size of their catch.


Got it?
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Nov 14, 2011 - 10:25pm PT
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Nov 14, 2011 - 10:32pm PT
Brilliant Fritz! Humans are so arrogant but the cockroaches are waiting in the wings- there will be revenge.
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 14, 2011 - 11:33pm PT
I don't recall using the word "giant" or "monster"describing the Mackenzie Valley subspecies of gray wolf. Wildlife taxonomy is a field of scientific inquiry and most experts in the field concede that particular subspecies (Canis lupus occidentalis) is larger than the subspecies native to the U.S. Rocky Mountains as well as the Mexican and Eastern Timberwolf subspecies of gray wolf.

References to wolf taxonomy publications, academic papers, wolf worship websites, wolf hater websites have been posted here, in past years, by Rokjox, myself and others. Everyone gets their opinion here...but before accusing a poster of making up "facts"...a circumspect poster will at least investigate the reference material.

The central issue is not the size of the Mackenzie Valley subspecies but whether that wolf is appropriate for the niche emptied in the near extirpation of native wolves by federal marshalls in the 1920's and 30's...and concerns over this subspecies surplus killing of prey animals (such as one wolf slaying 100 plus sheep near Dillon, Montana and the butchery of hundreds of wild elk left unconsumed, seemingly killed but for sport.)

Whether one dislikes the introduced wolves...or wants to sit and bay the moon with them, there is significant body of information, collected by trained professionals confirming differences in size, anatomical characteristics, average pack numbers, habituation etc.between the various North American subspecies.
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 14, 2011 - 11:42pm PT
Speaks for itself.


And if the wolves aren't slaughtering domestic animals in Idaho, why would they be doing so in Montana, Wyoming, or anywhere else? The repeated claim here is that the wolves generally are wreaking havoc on wildlife. The evidence, published by the Idaho Fish & Game Department (hardly supportive of wolves), clearly shows otherwise. Indeed, it seems that the entire Idaho state government is pretty much a captive regulator when it comes to these things, held captive by the hunting lobby, the farming lobby, the states rights crowd, and kooks.

As for real or imaginary wolf kills of wildlife - well, the wolves and the wildlife were here long before us two leggers. Maybe it will take a little while for an equilibrium to be found, as the wolves fill their niche, and the number of coyotes, elk, deer etc correspondingly decline. That is how nature works, and why should we tamper with it?

Noting that wolves may well have reintroduced themselves to Idaho from Canada, directly or via Montana or Washington.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Nov 14, 2011 - 11:59pm PT
MH: What?

You are usually more logical than this?

Do I fit into this category?

“Kooks.”



If wolves were proved to have killed 200-300 humans a year in Idaho or -----Vancouver, would that be significant?
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 15, 2011 - 12:14am PT
So the wolves kill a few hundred sheep and cattle in Idaho each year. How many hundred of thousands, or millions, introduced sheep* and cattle* live in Idaho? The number killed by the wolves is trivial, a rounding error. And the cost of reimbursing ranchers for livestock truly lost to wolves insignificant.

I'd hardly equate the life of a sheep or cow to that of a human, and fantasies notwithstanding, wolves so rarely come near let alone attack humans that it's a non-issue.

Speaking of wolves and ungulates - moose, deer, elk, etc - domestic animals on federally subsidized grazing probably have a far higher negative impact on the ungulate population than a few wolves. They compete directly for habitat. There'll be lots more for hunters if you only kick out all the cattle.

Ho hum. All deja wolf.

* Not counting the ones who vote Republican, that is.
Chewybacca

Trad climber
Montana, Whitefish
Nov 15, 2011 - 03:33am PT
Elk and deer are responsible for far more human deaths and injuries than wolves,bears,and cougars combined. Think of the children.....KILL ALL UNGULATES. Those tasty tasty ungulates...

On a side note...granny...if you don't make elk calls wolves won't run in your direction. Anyone who believes that 100lb wolf was attacking granny is a fool. It was searching out an elk bugle. Do any of you anti-wolf folk ever actually spend any time in the woods? I didn't think so...
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 15, 2011 - 07:38am PT
Wolves will come to elk bugles...so will Black and Grizzly bears as well as cougars. A neighbor down the road from my cabin claims to have taken eleven cougars with elk sounds.

Bull elk bugling declines sharply in early November and few or none are heard again until early September. But elk, both male and female, make chirps, mews, chuckles etc. year round. A wolf's hearing is much better than humans and they can navigate into elk sounds whenever a herd is actively communicating.

I've been out at night, as a child, with my dad recording elk sounds and seen predators come in and stalk a noisy herd. Wolf packs are much more efficient killing elk. In those days, the wolves hadn't moved into Island Park, though. Bears and cougars get elk calves and sickly animals but wolves take down healthy animals. Coyotes cut down some of the sickly too.

I doubt many newbie wolf hunters read supertopo...but if any do and weren't aware that bugles and elk talk bring in wolves... they are now.
Srbphoto

climber
Kennewick wa
Nov 15, 2011 - 11:12pm PT

WOLF KILLING: Oregon court stays kill order for cattle-killing wolvesBy Associated Press
http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2011/11/15/1719121/wolf-killing-oregon-court-stays.html


SALEM — The Oregon Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that conservation groups have a good chance of overturning a state order to kill wolves blamed for attacking livestock, and issued a stay that will remain in force until the lawsuit is settled.

The ruling filed in Salem set one condition: that conservation groups post $5,000 security against any livestock losses while the case is pending.

The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife issued an order in late September to kill two members of the Imnaha pack in Wallowa County, including the alpha male, after confirming by radio tracking collar data that the pack was responsible for another cattle kill in Wallowa County.

Conservation groups sued to challenge it, arguing the Oregon Wolf Management Plan, which allows wolves to be killed to reduce livestock attacks, does not comply with the state Endangered Species Act. While federal Endangered Species Act protection has been lifted for wolves in Eastern Oregon, the state act still covers them.

Steve Pedery, conservation director of Oregon Wild, said the issue was whether Oregon would do everything possible to prevent attacks on livestock, or resort to killing wolves whenever cattle are killed.

“I think killing those two wolves wouldn’t have done anything to reduce the likelihood of further livestock depredation,” said Noah Greenwald of the Center for Biological Diversity.“It would have left the Imnaha pack with the alpha female and one pup from this year. It’s pretty questionable they would make it through the winter. It would have very likely spelled the demise of the Imnaha pack.”

Pedery added that he thought that earlier kill orders carried out were a factor in the decision of two young wolves to leave the pack in early September. One of them, OR-7, has captured the hearts of people across the state since trekking some 300 miles.

At last report it was in the southern Cascade Range east of Butte Falls. Oregon Wild has started a contest to name it. The first entry, from a little girl in Wallowa County, was “Whosafraida.”

The Imnaha pack was the first in Oregon to breed pups since moving across the Snake River from Idaho, where they were reintroduced, and has been the only one of four packs known to exist that has been blamed for attacks on livestock — 14 livestock kills since mid-2010. Only one other pack has been confirmed to produce pups.

The Oregon Department of Justice, which represents the department, had not reviewed the case and had no immediate comment, said spokesman Tony Green. Oregon Cattlemen’s Association President Bill Hoyt said they were frustrated at the ruling.

“They had confirmed kills on the same ranch over a period of time and by the same pack,” he said. “The plan calls for after having multiple confirmed kills, they will take lethal control. That’s what the plan says.

“We didn’t like the plan to begin with. But we are learning to live with it. Now, all of a sudden we can’t even do that.”

The court found that while ranchers will likely suffer losses if the wolves aren’t killed, the Legislature has enacted a law to pay them for those losses.

Conservation groups have shown that killing the two wolves will cause irreparable harm to the Imnaha pack, and may cause irreparable harm to the reestablishment of wolves in Oregon in general, the court added.

While it is possible that the department’s feeling that killing wolves that attack livestock will build acceptance of wolves by ranchers, the Legislature has never expressed that point of view, the court wrote.

“There is no indication in the ESA that the legislature considered killing members of any specific endangered species, including gray wolves, as necessary to maintain the species at an optimum level or to ‘regulate’ the species,” the court wrote.

Acknowledging that nothing in the act prohibits the department from killing wolves, the court added that there is nothing that authorizes killing wolves, either.



Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 16, 2011 - 08:30pm PT
Elk (moose) are taking over from cattle in Norway, with significant environmental effects.
http://www.newsinenglish.no/2011/11/16/grazing-moose-take-over-from-cattle/
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 17, 2011 - 06:06am PT
Near Stanley, ID two weeks ago.


O.K. Dingus, if you won't convince Fatty to call in air strikes...I bet Anders can command them to march single file onto a swift boat to Norway.

After they've finished their hamburgers, of course...
Jennie

Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
Nov 17, 2011 - 06:22am PT
...better hurry Anders before the United States Fish and Wildlife Service convinces Norway to “re-introduce” jackals. :-)
Swami Jr.

Trad climber
Bath, NY
Nov 17, 2011 - 10:19am PT
This is insane. Wolves are just fine. They are, well, wolves. We need to stop being so disconnected from a healthy balance of nature.
dirtbag

climber
Nov 28, 2011 - 09:48am PT
Truly a magnificent part of nature, now in SW Oregon.

Long may you howl...

http://news.yahoo.com/wandering-wolf-inspires-hope-dread-094012216.html
James Wilcox

Boulder climber
Santa Barbara
Nov 28, 2011 - 12:46pm PT
I'm guessing you're more likely to die from produce at
you local market than a wolf.
couchmaster

climber
pdx
Nov 29, 2011 - 04:20pm PT
The first 2 wolfs to cross over into Oregon killed "27 sheep, a goat and a calf" in very short order in Baker County's Keating Valley.

Most of the sheep were just killed by the wolves for sport, not food, and left to lay. The locals and even fish and wildlife thought it might be domestic dogs till Fish and Wildlife got some camera shots.

They need to be managed, and yes, killed on occasion. That the wolves do have importance in the ecosystem only makes it more difficult to chose when or how to do this. But that's why we pay Fish and Wildlife experts good money, and we should let them do their jobs. And reimburse ranchers for loses.

Toker Villain

Big Wall climber
Toquerville, Utah
Nov 29, 2011 - 06:34pm PT
Great photo Jennie. Pretty easy to see who the leader of the pack is.



Anybody ever see the desert wolf of the northern Sahara and Arabian Peninsula?
Beautiful animals.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Nov 29, 2011 - 06:37pm PT
Ron,
The leader is the smart guy about 5 wolves back in line letting his minions break trail.
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Nov 29, 2011 - 06:46pm PT
Can Oregon declare war on Idaho for this appalling attack?
Toker Villain

Big Wall climber
Toquerville, Utah
Nov 29, 2011 - 07:24pm PT
I thought you were Norwegian not German.
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 29, 2011 - 07:34pm PT
Can Oregon declare war on Idaho for this appalling attack?

oregon needs predator drones along the snake river to keep that riffraff out. apparently hells canyon was not a significant enough geographical feature" to keep the wolves at bay" if you will....
sandstone conglomerate

climber
sharon conglomerate central
Nov 29, 2011 - 07:36pm PT
Why don't they just lace the dead livestock with strychnine like the buffalo "hunters" used to do. They could wipe out a lot more than wolves that way. Look at that pack roaming all free and sh#t. A bunch of potential rugs just walking through the snow like they have a right to be there...the audacity of those animals!
Hawkeye

climber
State of Mine
Nov 29, 2011 - 07:42pm PT
i hope my comments were taken in jest. i have heard wolves in teh wild several times but not seen them. they would have migrated down from canada without the reintroduction to jellystone, assuming that they were protected. at some point, since man has altered the natural balance of nature we will have to control the population of wolves too. whether you agree or not, that is just the way that we have done things. name an animal (bear/coyote/elk/deer/bobcat/cougar) man tries to control the population of all of them.
Toker Villain

Big Wall climber
Toquerville, Utah
Nov 29, 2011 - 07:55pm PT
Tries is the operative word.

No way man can kill off the coyote. We've killed so many stupid ones that the remainders are breeding geniuses.




EDIT
Oh shite the kiss of death 2 posts down
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Nov 29, 2011 - 09:51pm PT
Thanks to Piton Ron for this quote:

Tries is the operative word.

No way man can kill off the coyote. We've killed so many stupid ones that the remainders are breeding geniuses.






From Fritz: "Coyotes & wolves are smarter than many ST posteurs!"
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Nov 29, 2011 - 11:52pm PT
Fritz, many....or most? I'll go with most, myself included.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Nov 29, 2011 - 11:53pm PT
Hey LEB!! Since you are here and "posteur-ing."

Would you please give advice on Dingus's eye problem?

http://www.supertopo.com/climbers-forum/1677971/Eye-bleed-on-airplane

Seriously.

You may have an "medical-posteur-place" on ST!
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Nov 30, 2011 - 12:10am PT
Donini: re your question/comment


Fritz, many....or most? I'll go with most, myself included.



Howabout?? Smarter than darn-near all, but the wiliest of us?

I have not had a wolf encounter: but our desert foot-hill coyotes run away hard if surprised, then lope until they are out of accurate rifle range, then trot until they are out of sight.
Messages 1 - 362 of total 362 in this topic
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta