Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 25721 - 25740 of total 28535 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
bobinc

Trad climber
Portland, Or
Oct 9, 2014 - 12:07pm PT
I've always wondered if the creationist "museums" include protists on the guest list of the ark. Do they charge you a fee to use a microscope?
Norton

Social climber
quitcherbellyachin
Oct 9, 2014 - 12:07pm PT
Sketch said to Ed:


No, dumbass. I said the question is simple.

Sketch, just curious if you would, where did you go to college and what is your degree in?

thanks
The Chief

climber
Laughing at all you angry blinded asshat Sheep
Oct 9, 2014 - 01:18pm PT
WTF are you guys smoking? Ed has laid it out as plainly as you could possibly ask for and you take snippets out of the data

Really?

Where is the OBSERVED HUMAN C02 EMISSIONS DATA going back to 1850 that correlates with ALL the TEMP DATA that EDH posted that I asked EDH to contribute in order to show any sort of evidence that the C02 "slope" is caused by humans.

Not one single piece of OBSERVED REAL TIME evidence that correlates with the CAGW ASSUMPTION which states it is all CAUSED by humans.

It is all just ASSUMED that it is so in order to perpetuate the unceasing political Utopian ideology. Then implement that ideology onto the rest of the world. All based on the CONSENSUS OF ASSUMPTION.


Like I posted earlier... DEJA VU!



Yeah, we learn from our prior decision making don't we.



Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Oct 9, 2014 - 01:43pm PT
what does a linear trend line (which you didn't calculate yourself even, you used the tool on your blog site) have to do with anything?

that is not a simple question. And I suspect you can't answer it.
The Chief

climber
Laughing at all you angry blinded asshat Sheep
Oct 9, 2014 - 01:46pm PT
Where is the real time physical evidence that is supported by any actual OBSERVED HUMAN C02 EMISSIONS DATA stemming back to the 1850 mark, EDH?


That is a very simple question, EDH.


Please post it.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Oct 9, 2014 - 02:26pm PT
Credit: wilbeer

Credit: wilbeer

From NASA.

Let's see who can make a correlation.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Oct 9, 2014 - 02:59pm PT
How come NASA did not.

You sure told me.
The Chief

climber
Laughing at all you angry blinded asshat Sheep
Oct 9, 2014 - 03:18pm PT
P o st the NASA r e f Wilber that indicates the methodology for achieving your pretty picture
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Oct 9, 2014 - 03:28pm PT
Not a chance little guy


Why ?Do you see a correlation?
Norton

Social climber
quitcherbellyachin
Oct 9, 2014 - 03:31pm PT
Sketch

do you have a college degree and is it in social studies or science related?

thanks
Mark Force

Trad climber
Cave Creek, AZ
Oct 9, 2014 - 03:42pm PT
Chief, the earlier CO2 emissions are calculated values from knowns regarding carbon fuel consumption (wood, coal, gas, and oil burning) derived from economic records (commerce), population records, and the CO2 emissions associated with each type of fuel. It's been hashed out over about five decades and is pretty damn close. Nobody made that sh#t up; not how it works.

I'm sure that's been put out before on the thread. One mouth, two ears....
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Oct 9, 2014 - 03:52pm PT
Central England does not represent a global or even northern hemisphere average, Sketch.
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Oct 9, 2014 - 03:57pm PT
Iíve seen many from here, but none like this.


The Chief

climber
Laughing at all you angry blinded asshat Sheep
Oct 9, 2014 - 04:21pm PT
Hey Mark...

Like the global record keeping accuracy of surface and sea surface temps up till the 1950s
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Oct 9, 2014 - 04:29pm PT
Point to the uncertainties,not 1950 until now .

Oh no,not those,look at the ones where there MAY have been accuracy flaws.

You do your side well.

[golf clap in order]
The Chief

climber
Laughing at all you angry blinded asshat Sheep
Oct 9, 2014 - 05:17pm PT
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,

Oct 9, 2014 - 04:29pm PT
Point to the uncertainties, not 1950 until now .

Oh no,not those,look at the ones where there MAY have been accuracy flaws.

You do your side well.

Apparently somebody is doing "our" side well.


You seen the latest polls Wilbeer?

Obviously not.





PSSSSSST!

CC is the LEAST OF AMERICAN's worries.



In other words Wilbeer, NO ONE GIVES A SHET about your AGW ideology other than you very few social eco freaks.
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Oct 9, 2014 - 05:27pm PT
Does that make them completely irrelevant? Opinions vary.
what does the linear trend of SST with time have to do with climate?

My question to you, concerns the "cooling" period. It remains unanswered.
that would be "SST cooling" once again, what does it have to do with climate?

monolith

climber
SF bay area
Oct 9, 2014 - 05:46pm PT
Then what was your point with the law dome graph, Sketch?

And yep, when you posted the graph below, you are claiming that the central England graph(red) is global average.



Sketch: That is so cool how the IPCC braintrust was able to rewrite the Medieval Warm Period.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Oct 9, 2014 - 05:59pm PT
In other words Wilbeer, NO ONE GIVES A SHET about your AGW ideology other than you very few social eco freaks.




Happy to agree you are NO ONE.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Oct 9, 2014 - 06:04pm PT
It's all been explained very well by IPCC scientists. Perhaps it is you who should dig further and not be so gullible.
Messages 25721 - 25740 of total 28535 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Trip Report and Articles
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews