Netanyahu's Iran speech

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 201 - 212 of total 212 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
May 9, 2016 - 04:50pm PT
i dont think iran would get that in bed with russia

They would love to hop into the sack with Russia if it would benefit them.
Trade a little oil for weaponry and nuclear whatever? In a heartbeat!
These guys are the original rug salesmen and they will do a deal just for
the love of doing the deal, unless it costs them. Right now their 'best'
friends are China, India, and Turkey; they're the ones that benefited the
most from the sanctions being lifted.
Dingus Milktoast

Trad climber
Minister of Moderation, Fatcrackistan
May 9, 2016 - 05:05pm PT
They would love to hop into the sack with Russia if it would benefit them.

So would most of the western world. One trouble though....

mother russia walk down hill, screw them all.

DMT
WBraun

climber
May 9, 2016 - 05:11pm PT
No way Jose

The Putinator is a good guy.

Even Obama likes him.

The Trumpinator likes him.

The terrorist McCain don't like him.

Bibi the sh!t head don't like him.

The aszhole Turkey's Erdogan hates him.

Ho mannnn the stoopid topo brainwashed fools don't like him.

Tactical nukes don't like him ......
Dingus Milktoast

Trad climber
Minister of Moderation, Fatcrackistan
May 9, 2016 - 05:12pm PT
^^^ LOL, I see your point.

DMT
ecdh

climber
the east
May 9, 2016 - 05:41pm PT
Mmmm naaah

Despite the stereotypes it would entail a political and strategic process so twisted, with so much risk and so little reason its very difficult to see. That they never did as a full renegade state makes it very unlikely for the future.

Conven weapons, maybe, but for both sides a joint nuclear love in - nope.

Its not the 60s. The field isnt as clunky and black and white. The forms of bold foreign policy face iffs if that era dont apply any more. Iran didnt back off its nuke ideas because it wanted to be cuddly, it did so because there are better ways now to solve security issues and to make cash.
WBraun

climber
May 9, 2016 - 05:56pm PT
Iran didn't back off its nuke ideas because it wanted to be cuddly,
it did so because there are better ways now to solve security issues and to make cash.


Yes ... just see good intelligence.

Instead the western loons keep making fear mongering and aggression against the rest of the world to rape its resources in the guise of war.

Stoopid western idiots and their stoopid nukes and war.

Just see the stoopid loon westerners at work making hell on earth ......
ecdh

climber
the east
May 9, 2016 - 06:29pm PT
Whilst i admire your fervour Werner, i think the westerners in the iran game are doing ok - but yes its very out of character.
Kerry has done a good job i think, in part because he fortfied his position with japan, who have always been a key player in iran and give some balance eastward of iran ie burma and china where other aspects of the iran deal are being felt.

agreed the neo con idiots are missing the ball, but theres some good people quietly on the job.

For now...
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
May 9, 2016 - 06:34pm PT
Israel is not using tactical nukes. Another goofy conspiracy theory.
zBrown

Ice climber
May 9, 2016 - 07:54pm PT
Hey mann, it's on youtube



and elsewhere

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/09/04/vt-nuclear-education-the-uranium-hydride-bomb/
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
May 9, 2016 - 07:59pm PT
Israel is not using tactical nukes

Cause they don't need to when they can kick yer ass three ways to Sunday
with conventionals. Besides, this is all a big poker game and nobody is
gonna call until everybody is all in.

zBrown, nice 1000 lb bomb blast.

zBrown

Ice climber
May 9, 2016 - 08:13pm PT
Welcome to the age of 5th gen hybrid nuclear weapons, a more deadly and dangerous age than the Cold War.

I'll read through it later.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/09/04/vt-nuclear-education-the-uranium-hydride-bomb/


This is a list of some of the most common misconceptions about nuclear weapons use:

“There was no significant fallout in the vicinity of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. All radiation injuries were a result of immediate (first 1 minute) radiation.” True.
“The only cases of significant fallout exposure as of 1964 to individuals, was in the Marshall Islands after a U.S. test. The short term effects were skin ‘burns’. As of 1964, no long term effects were known, although a slight excess cancer rate would be expected based on modern knowledge.” True.
“Almost all radioactivity in fallout – even in a ground burst – comes from the fission products themselves or transmutation of parts of the weapon. Thus air bursts and ground bursts produce approximately the same amount of radioactive products. However, ground bursts cause much more of the radioactive debris to be deposited within a fallout pattern, rather than distributed (and accordingly diluted and decayed) across the entire planet.” True.
“The blast effect is primarily determined by the “overpressure” – given in English units in PSI. A human being can withstand up to about 35PSI of peak overpressure from a nuclear blast (1% fatality rate). Your distance may vary. Thus a human will almost always survive the blast overpressure at approximately the following distances (slant range) from a blast according to the following table”: when we extrapolate these statistics, we see that the news reports from other blasts are consistent with these scientific data. True.


Where have we seen this effect used before?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
May 10, 2016 - 07:42am PT
Tactical nuclear weapon


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

U.S. officials view a W54 nuclear warhead (with a 10 or 20 ton explosive yield) as used on the Davy Crockett recoilless gun. The unusually small size of this tactical nuclear weapon is visible.
A tactical nuclear weapon (or TNW) also known as non-strategic nuclear weapon[1] refers to a nuclear weapon which is designed to be used on a battlefield in military situations, mostly with friendly forces in proximity and perhaps even on contested friendly territory. This is opposed to strategic nuclear weapons which are designed to be mostly targeted in the enemy interior away from the war front against nuclear forces, cities, factories, and other hardened or larger-area targets to damage the enemy's ability to wage war. Tactical nuclear weapons were a large part of the peak nuclear weapons stockpile levels during the Cold War.



Was a tactical nuclear weapon, or neutron bomb, detonated in Yemen ...

https://www.quora.com/Was-a-tactical-nuclear-weapon-or-neutron-bomb-deton...

That's not a nuclear explosion. It's just a big conventional explosion, likely due to a conventional weapons depot being hit by a conventional missile. Big e...
Messages 201 - 212 of total 212 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews