The New "Religion Vs Science" Thread

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 2041 - 2060 of total 10585 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 3, 2015 - 08:09pm PT
My direct pointing was squarely at Evolution's fundamentality.

As opposed to say, chemistry's fundamentality? Or Math's fundamentality? You're pretty much loading and conflating both words in a fairly odd way. Could you possibly rephrase?
jgill

Boulder climber
The high prairie of southern Colorado
Feb 3, 2015 - 08:35pm PT
what about Climber Fundamentalist?

They call themselves "trad climbers." Don't cross swords with those guys; they take no prisoners!


;>)
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Feb 3, 2015 - 08:47pm PT

Could you possibly rephrase?

i'll try.

Basically/fundamentally evolution caused/predicted say, the Lion to eat meat. Another words, to kill another life possessing a brain with eyes in-order to sustain it's own life. While a deer will sustain it's own life by being vegetarian and eating only grass. These are just examples in the animal kingdom.

For them, we could say that killing is righteous because it promotes their species to live.

Way back when, when man first stood up. Was he carnivorous or vegetarian? Early on he killed to eat, or he killed to not be killed.

Fact to the matter is, he killed brains with eyes for one reason or another.

Today with our intelligence and enlightenment we have the choice to choose whether or not to put asleep eyes with a brain. For any reason. We don't need to eat meat for our success. And we surely don't need to kill to stay alive.

Most of us do have a choice.

That's what i meant by evolutionality.

Help?
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Feb 3, 2015 - 08:52pm PT

As opposed to say, chemistry's fundamentality? Or Math's fundamentality?

Those thing's certainly have their place. But once Life got started, didn't natural selection start determining?
WBraun

climber
Feb 3, 2015 - 08:57pm PT
And we surely don't need to kill to stay alive.

Everyone is a killer and there's no escape.

Every time you take a bath you kill .... bacteria.

It has life.

But once Life got started,

Life never ever got started.

It's eternal, never born never dies .....

BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Feb 3, 2015 - 08:59pm PT
yeah yeah, jus talk'in to the short term eyes


edit;thought you might salute my abhorrence to eating duck
MikeL

Social climber
Seattle, WA
Feb 3, 2015 - 09:37pm PT
DMT: It's very simple and not theoritical at all MikeL... Survivors and procreators win.

There’s something not very satisfying (as it concerns prediction) when someone says that who or whatever ends up standing is a proof or an instantiation of evolution. There is a focus on genes, but don’t “genes” then become some kind of universal answer in all instances?

When I said that evolution moves us forward, there is a sense that life become more complex, it becomes more aware, as well as becoming more dominant and numerous and “successful” (procreation). (I think Werner is arguing against this idea, but his view might hold a different time frame in mind.)

Is evolution random and non-directional? Is that how it seems to folks? Survival of the Fittest might be descriptive of what happens, but in a broader view, would it merely explain or describe randomness?

Winning is everything? It’s the only thing that matters?


Then, hell, . . . if ISIS can garner enough resources, then it SHOULD win. It would be “right” in that it wins?

If we’re not careful, we’ll find ourselves taking a metric of success and use that to argue that is what SHOULD happen (and make policy by it). It seems a process of post hoc ergo proper hoc, no?
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 3, 2015 - 09:48pm PT
Isotopic evidence based on nitrogen isotope ratios in the bones of early modern humans shows pretty conclusively we've always been omnivores and opportunistic feeders.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Feb 3, 2015 - 09:53pm PT

Then, hell, . . . if ISIS can garner enough resources, then it SHOULD win. It would be “right” in that it wins?

Thr Great White shark might agree with you. But what about the Big Blue whale wiggling around behind her with a gigantic smile? Eating greens!
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Feb 3, 2015 - 09:56pm PT

we've always been omnivores and opportunistic feeders.

K!

so why was MartinLutherKing killed for what he said?
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Feb 3, 2015 - 10:02pm PT
Goggle released today that it was going to start recording YOUR facial expressions. All under the guise to help provide for you.

No doubt this information WILL be "lost" or sold to the AI dudes
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Feb 3, 2015 - 10:07pm PT
sorry, broke-up with my girl-friend yesterday



edit; hey,maybe that's what happened to BK?
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 3, 2015 - 10:09pm PT
so why was MartinLutherKing killed for what he said?

Huh?

sorry, broke-up with my girl-friend yesterday

Sorry to hear it...

But what about the Big Blue whale wiggling around behind her with a gigantic smile? Eating greens!

Blue Whales are almost exclusively Crustaceavores eating Krill and similar Zooplankton . Those Crustaceans in turn live on various [Phyto-]Plankton. So you could say Blue Whales are only one level of indirection away from being Vegans. Think of it this way: something as big as a Blue Whale and many other Antarctic creatures have to have an intermediate to 'concentrate' the food value inherent in the Plankton as they could never directly collect enough Plankton to support their needs.

And interesting tidbit there is the leap in predator/prey size ratio between Krill and Plankton is similarly and unusually huge as it is between the Blue Whales and Krill.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Feb 3, 2015 - 10:23pm PT
Sorry to hear it...

Thanks. it was a good learning experience..
---------------------------------------------------------------------


the size thing IS really neat. but this;

a Blue Whale and many other Antarctic creatures have to have an intermediate to 'concentrate' the food value inherent in the Plankton as they could never directly collect enough Plankton to support their needs.

if big blue had enough greens, would he still eat meat?

if the Lion started eating only grass. Would he still be The Lion?


so why was MartinLutherKing killed for what he said?

Huh?

has a Lion ever killed a deer, because the deer talked sh#t about the eating habits of The Lion, or in his belief of a Creator?
Bushman

Social climber
In this form at present
Feb 3, 2015 - 11:03pm PT
'When the Women Take Over the World'

While the west was waging war,
On jihadis too extreme,
They were dropping lots of bombs,
And drinking their Jim Beam,
And the terrorist were crazy,
They were living in a dream,
As they pissed off all their wives,
Who were hatching their own scheme,

In the west there was a coup,
Of a different sort of type,
It went off without a hitch,
With no fireworks or hype,
In every latitude and haunt,
It was coming down the pipe,
Twas a feeling in the air,
It was more than just a gripe,

Men were caught so unaware,
And the women made their calls,
As the girls in uniform,
We're breaking down the walls,
All the females schooled in science,
Were plotting in their halls,
As the men of earth were sleeping,
They sacrificed their balls,

So the females of this world,
Would multiply like birds,
And strike down any man,
While keeping up their guards,
And the women reigned supreme,
As the men were kept in herds,
They were lobotomized and sterile,
And no longer used their words.

So the men gave up their power,
And dominion alway falls,
To the last person standing,
More so when nature calls,
Waging war with their machismo,
The men snored in their stalls,
And the women sent them packing,
Beneath the valley of the dolls.

-bushman
02/03/2015
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Feb 3, 2015 - 11:19pm PT
Haha
that was my exact condolence's(condignacy)?, LAST NIGHT. That girl was the most emotionalextremeistsensationalistimaginallarityist ever.

Today i'm begging for a scientific chick. Maybe one of Fruity's young'ons?
MikeL

Social climber
Seattle, WA
Feb 3, 2015 - 11:54pm PT
It’s so difficult to live in the now. The future naturally rolls out as a projection, and the past is being recast as we remember it. But now is so infinite. There’s so much going on at any one moment, it’s almost not possible. Everything is all there. Nothing is not.

I think I’m an entity. I think there is this world around me. I think I am in it. What a movie. Interactive.

Just now. Right-here-right-now is a destination. RHRN is just a consciousness radiating. And what projects that?

I’m just amusing myself.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Feb 4, 2015 - 12:13am PT

I’m just amusing myself.

i can predict my tomorrow.

i can tell you of my yesterday.

Right Now, idon't know...La La La
Jan

Mountain climber
Colorado, Nepal & Okinawa
Feb 4, 2015 - 12:32am PT
Interesting editorial in the new York times today about what secularism needs to do to really suceed.Should be interesting to fructose anyway.


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/03/opinion/david-brooks-building-better-secularists.html?action=click&contentCollection=N.Y.%20%2F%20Region&module=MostEmailed&version=Full®ion=Marginalia&src=me&pgtype=article
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Feb 4, 2015 - 12:41am PT
I read that in the NYTimes OpEd piece and thought that it was exactly wrong... emotionalism is a double edged sword, you can harness it for great good and for great harm.

We have emotions, we don't need to sanctify them.
Messages 2041 - 2060 of total 10585 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta