OT Just how bad is the drought? Just curious OT

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 301 - 320 of total 1730 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Apr 2, 2014 - 11:01pm PT
Labrat, those number are not that bad. Especially because we have more water on the way this weekend, and probably more later in April.

I think we'll probably be o.k., but as for the future costs of our stupid 'bullet-train', that's a bit different IMO.

EDIT:
bluey...I think you would be suprised by how many people would use the train...there's talk about a high speed train from LA to Bishop...rj


I doubt it. But isn't it funny there is no 'environmental impact' bullshit with this train, but s stupid smelt gets all the attention?

Think that maybe there are lobbying interests involved in both cases? California is rotten.
labrat

Trad climber
Auburn, CA
Apr 2, 2014 - 11:04pm PT
"Wanting to fry the Smelt is indeed shortsighted."

How about adding Spring-Run Chinook, Steelhead and Green Sturgeon to your list?

They are all species listed as “threatened” under the federal Endangered Species Act.

I would rather have these fish swimming in the Sacramento delta and up into the mountains as far as possible.
Erik
labrat

Trad climber
Auburn, CA
Apr 2, 2014 - 11:08pm PT
bluering
I'm not saying the recent rains are not welcome. So far I see it as too little too late.

It did seem to put a damper on climbing in the Emeralds this weekend. I believe there is about a foot of new snow in the last week. It was dry with no snow week before last. :-(
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Apr 2, 2014 - 11:08pm PT
They are all species listed as “threatened” under the federal Endangered Species Act.

So was the Peregrine Falcon. It's simply bullsh#t, they'll never get de-listed. But I agree the Sturgeon and Salmon are valuable. More valuable than the Delta Smelt. The other fish feed on other fish, not the DS exclusively, if at all. Even been fishing in the Delta?

The SF Delta is a very healthy eco-system.
Bob Harrington

climber
Bishop, California
Apr 2, 2014 - 11:20pm PT
In my neighborhood, on Bishop Creek, South Lake storage: 0%, Lake Sabrina storage: 0%. I heard from a retired So Cal Edison employee that this is the first time ever that both lakes have been flat empty.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Apr 2, 2014 - 11:24pm PT
Not sure if anyone pays attention to this stuff, but as an avid fisherman, I do. But poaching is a huge problem in the Delta, and off the coast for Abalone.

The good news is that the Dept. Fish/Game is really on top of this shit! They busted a Russian immigrant group that was poaching Delta sturgeon caviar (you're supposed to take one/day of size, over 64 inches?) and selling it in Russian delis as Belluga caviar.

That is little baby sturgeon that never get born, aborted!!! And the populations of sturgeon are obviously directed affected. Not many people know that Shasta is loaded with sturgeon too. I've only got 2 from the DElta, and let them both go. Not really good eatin'.

Oh, and Vietnamese and Chinese immigrants have no respect for these bag-limits, trust me, I've witnessed it first hand. I saw a guy cut the fins off a bat-ray and just leave the f*#king there on a dock still alive. Really? Can't at least kill the damn thing too?

There are reasons we have reasonable limits on fishing. Abide by them.
labrat

Trad climber
Auburn, CA
Apr 2, 2014 - 11:26pm PT
'Even been fishing in the Delta?'

Yes. And I grew up fishing most of the Yuba watershed along with many of the other rivers in northern California as I got older.

'The SF Delta is a very healthy eco-system.'

Totally disagree. Maybe if we managed to eradicate some of the introduced fish, invasive invertebrates and invasive plants species it might be.

Suggested reading
http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_612JMR.pdf

http://www.sacriver.org/aboutwatershed/plants/background-invasive-plants

http://californiawaterblog.com/2011/04/06/stressed-out%E2%80%94dealing-with-the-deltas-non-native-landscape/

EDIT
I totally agree with this 'poaching is a huge problem in the Delta, and off the coast for Abalone.'

I've seen the Abalone problem first hand on the coast and Salmon poaching on the Yuba. :-(
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Apr 2, 2014 - 11:32pm PT
Maybe if we managed to eradicate some of the introduced fish, invasive invertebrates and invasive plants species it might be.

Of course, but I was talking about overall quality of the water and flora/fauna. What invasive fish are you talking about? I heard conflicting accounts that the Delta Smelt is not indigenous, but others disagree.

The invertebrates are even a problem in local lakes now, freshwater. Came from Asian cargo boats they say. After people take their freshwater boats into the Delta and re-introduce them to lakes, the infection occurs.

And yeah, some of them can survive in brackish water, or freshwater.

labrat

Trad climber
Auburn, CA
Apr 2, 2014 - 11:45pm PT
'What invasive fish are you talking about?'

Yes, I know many of these are great to fish for and catch. I've chased many of them myself (really enjoy the American Shad!).

The delta would be better off without them!

American shad
Striped bass
Brown trout
Channel catfish
White catfish
Yellow bullhead
Brown bullhead
Black bullhead
Black crappie
White crappie
Green sunfish
Bluegill
Redear sunfish
Largemouth bass
Smallmouth bass
Treadfin shad
Carp
Goldfish

EDIT
'I heard conflicting accounts that the Delta Smelt is not indigenous'

Seriously? Do some more reading. It would not be listed if it were not native....

EDIT 2
Source http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/publications_forms/available_documents/peir_consolidate_cvpermits/docs/appendixc.pdf
ruppell

climber
Apr 2, 2014 - 11:56pm PT
That whole deal was a mismanaged decision on the part of those two, SCE & DWP. Had nothing to do with the "drought".

What? Do you even read what you post? You just stated that they where planning on a 65% fill the first year then 100% the next. That never happened. Why? Wait for it:


A DROUGHT started those years.












labrat

Trad climber
Auburn, CA
Apr 3, 2014 - 12:01am PT
It appears that The Chief is still groggy from the blows with zBrown ;-)
labrat

Trad climber
Auburn, CA
Apr 3, 2014 - 12:20am PT
Chief. 06/07 or 07/08? Please state you source ;-) 06/07 was a bad year

Annual Snowfall Totals


1997/1998 310
1998/1999 120
1999/2000 124
2000/2001 263
2001/2002 53
2002/2003 81
2003/2004 104
2004/2005 278
2005/2006 76
2006/2007 29
2007/2008 124
2008/2009 130
2009/2010 153
2010/2011 155
2011/2012 45
2012/2013 77
2013/2014 25

126 Inches (17 year avg)

Source
http://www.mthigh.com/mountain/snow-totals

EDIT The above is a bad example ;-(
labrat

Trad climber
Auburn, CA
Apr 3, 2014 - 12:25am PT
That's why I said it was a bad example.

How about this one. You can put in the years you want to see....

http://cdec.water.ca.gov/cdecapp/snowapp/swcchart.action

for North, Central, and South (California)

Sorry

bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Apr 3, 2014 - 12:30am PT
American shad
Striped bass
Brown trout
Channel catfish
White catfish
Yellow bullhead
Brown bullhead
Black bullhead
Black crappie
White crappie
Green sunfish
Bluegill
Redear sunfish
Largemouth bass
Smallmouth bass
Treadfin shad
Carp
Goldfish

What? Many of those species are natural hikers into brackish waters that seperate their natural waters from the salty Bay waters. Wouldn't call them intrusive. And Stripers are like Salmon, WTF? They use the oceans and the freshwater or brackish waters equally as a natural habitat.

Maybe goldfish though.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Apr 3, 2014 - 12:36am PT
Wow, that's GREAT! Chuffer picks a random day of a random year and shows that we have almost, but not quite, reached that arbitrary amount of water!

Pay no attention to the fact that we are still 25-40% of normal... the 2006-07 snowpack had already started melting by April... and we are still more comparable to the driest year on record.

What a fuking dipsh#t.


We currently stand some 1.9" or so from equally 2007's total snowfall at Mammoth Pass.

(shhh, nobody tell the idiot he is looking at current snowpack and not total precipitation... or "total snowfall"... let's see how long it takes him to catch on... and see if he can comprehend the important difference)
labrat

Trad climber
Auburn, CA
Apr 3, 2014 - 12:44am PT
Thanks for the laughs! Glad I'm in a chair....
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Apr 3, 2014 - 01:03am PT
Pay no attention to the fact that we are still 25% of normal... the 2006-07 snowpack had already started melting by April... and we are still more comparable to the driest year on record.

The 'year' is not over yet. If you've lived in California, or done any research as a "hydrologist", you'd realize that Cali does this thing every 15 to 30 years or so. Natural cycles. We call them Indian Summers.

But I don't even see that happening this year, it's sub-par, but far from a "drought".

Again. let see what April brings...
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Apr 3, 2014 - 01:05am PT
Awesome, redefining drought again!!! Just like you redefined climate to fit your needs. It must be difficult constantly fooling yourself into thinking you know sh#t about sh#t... unless of course you are an idiot... in which case it must be quite easy.

Imagine how stupid I would look if I went to a helipad and insisted I knew how to fly one of them whirly birds better than the pilots. Yeah, you look 100x stupider.

file:///C:/Users/Ricki/Downloads/Eastern%20Sierra%20Current%20Precipitation%20Conditions%20(3).pdf

Awesome Ricki... you included a link to your C: drive!!!!

Ah but then changed it to (god only knows what you were going for there) some LADWP site. Can you explain how that relates to the DWR site you referenced at the top of the page? (http://cdec.water.ca.gov/cdecapp/snowapp/swcchart.action);

Perhaps you were going for this: "Measurement as Inches Water Content; Precipitation totals are cumulative for water year beginning Oct 1"

Found here: https://www.ladwp.com/cs/idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&dDocName=LADWP003464&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased

Pure jenius!

it's sub-par, but far from a "drought".

hahahaha... blurring, you are a fuking idiot. It is a drought by definition! Unless of course we allow idiots to change the definition at whim.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Apr 3, 2014 - 01:26am PT
Imagine how stupid I would look if I went to a helipad and insisted I knew how to fly one of them whirly birds better than the pilots. Yeah, you look 100x stupider

Not really an accurate analogy. It would be more like telling a "hydrologist" that more water falling from the skies on a daily basis isn't less likely to incur a drought.

How can you stand by your "data-models" when it's APril 2nd? Have you no history in you models of Calif Aprils??
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Apr 3, 2014 - 01:27am PT
Shut the fuk up Donny and go look up how drought is defined outside your own vapid skull.
Messages 301 - 320 of total 1730 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta