OT Just how bad is the drought? Just curious OT

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1021 - 1040 of total 1730 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
neebee

Social climber
calif/texas
Jun 15, 2015 - 03:35pm PT
hey there say, malemute... this is good to remember, as well...

thanks for sharing:

For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.

H. L. Mencken


and, for every complex problem, too, OCCASIONALLY there is an ANSWER that is right under 'ones nose' (as the saying goes) but:

if it does not MATCH a 'pre-conceived idea' it is ignored...


oh my, sometimes human are more complex, than the complex problems, :O
and thus, if THEY made the problems, whewwww--it sure can be a mess to sort it out and fix it... :(
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jun 15, 2015 - 06:43pm PT

Jun 15, 2015 - 02:30pm PT
Farmers are generally not permitted to sell their water rights to cities. If they started selling them it would devastate farming communities economies, further distorting the screwed up mess we have created by giving away water to one class, and charging another class ten times as much.

Farmers are allowed to sell their water rights and are making fortunes off it RIGHT NOW!

http://modernfarmer.com/2015/03/california-farmers-are-selling-water-to-the-state-instead-of-growing-crops/


California's drought is so bad that farmers in Northern California are finding that their crops aren't their most valuable asset anymore—it's their water rights. So they're selling their water back to the state at crazy-high prices.

Keep in mind that this water is subsidized by the federal government and taxpayers across the county.
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 15, 2015 - 07:04pm PT
I can't remember, but how much of the alfalfa crop gets shipped out of the U.S. across the Pacific Ocean?
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jun 15, 2015 - 07:17pm PT
@zBrown.

Not sure offhand, but Alfalfa accounts for 37% of California's irrigated water usage and 7% of its crop revenue.

http://californiawaterblog.com/2015/04/14/dollars-and-drops-per-crop-in-california/

So it really doesn't matter how much goes abroad. If all of it stayed here it's still a bad investment.

Water is so heavily subsidized that even this makes sense on some level.
Splater

climber
Grey Matter
Jun 15, 2015 - 07:49pm PT
In regard to selling water rights - it's often not allowed.
Not sure what the legality of NoCal senior rights to sell depends on,
but when San Diego bought (for a limited term) rights to 100-200K acre feet of Imperial's water from the Colorado, it was allowed because it was termed "new water." Much of it comes from lining the All-American canal, the Coachella canal and distribution canals, so it wasn't water that farmers were actually using. It also is supposed to come from "farm water savings techniques," which is more dubious.

The Coachella Valley (north of the Sea) Water District had to be appeased since they are supposed to have secondary rights to that water. IID agreed to give them water also.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/02/140218-salton-sea-imperial-valley-qsa-water-conservation/
http://archive.desertsun.com/interactive/article/20130908/NEWS07/309080001/Desert-water-supply-aquifer-pumping-analysis

just some of the docs in this massive agreement http://www.sdcwa.org/quantification-settlement-agreement

There is still a big pending lawsuit because to get the deal approved, the state agreed to "fix" the Salton Sea. However a full fix is impossible, since the Salton Sea is a temporary and accidental phenomenon, gradually shinking and becoming more concentrated with salt and agricultural waste runoff. A partial fix to keep some of it cleaner for longer might be possible.

also, water from the new Desal Plant in San Diego will be about $2000 per AF, which is 100 times the cost of water in the Imperial ($20 per AF, delivered price). One reason for higher cost of desal in California compared to places like Israel is the strict rules on ocean water intake and even on the outlet return.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jun 15, 2015 - 07:58pm PT
The water sales may or may not be allowed, but farmers are selling it.

The Owens River water was supposed to originally go only to the city of LA. The developers ( who spearheaded the water grab) stole the excess for the San Fernando valley. None of it was supposed to go there, but LA didn't want the Owens valley folks to think they had rights left, so they let the developers steal it.vthe idea was they could turn off the tap later.

The real story with Colorado water is that the State allocates more water than exists ( ask Arizona)

All the smoke and mirrors won't hide that the 'new water' isn't new at all, and doesn't even come up to the percentage levels set in the Colorado River Compact. If they wanted new water they would blow up Glenn Canyon dam and release 830,000 acre feet of water lost to evaporation off Lake Powell each year. That's actually"old" water that existed before the dam went in and is part of the water figured in the original Colorado River Compact.


That's why the river dries up before it reaches the sea. Jaguars used to live in the delta jungle. Conquistadors wrote about the danger.

The Salton sea is hopeless. It will be mostly gone by 2026 and completely gone in 50 years. Even with the current influx of 1.2 million acre feet per year it doesn't replace what is lost to evaporation. The waste in it is so concentrated that there are huge bird die offs every year. The only reasonably healthy population is Pelicans, a salt water species. They feed on polluted tilapia, the only fish species that isn't near extinction and isn't native.

The only reason to spend money on it is to appease developers who still want to snooker people who might want to buy and appease the fools who already bought.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jun 15, 2015 - 10:13pm PT
I'm not sure what unsubsidized rates or market rates means in terms of farming. Irrigation water from any source in California is heavily subsidized by the federal government infrastructure in the form of the dams, canals, and basically free land to pump the water to. Without the water it's desert and worthless. There is no possible way to have the users pay for what it cost and economically farm.

And at the current rates even the irrigated land will be too salty to grow crops on and what's left will be too polluted with chemicals to be reclaimed. If you can believe it, one solution for the Salton Sea pollution is to pump the water to the Laguna Salada in Mexico, where "new" polluted water flows in the "new" canal/river and we try to tell the Mexicans its part of their allotment.

We will have done in 150 years what it took the kingdom of Uruk 3300 years to do and it will again be open desert. You have to think of irrigated land as an expendable commodity.

That was over 2 1/2 millennia ago and Uruk is still desert, though smack between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.

Gilgamesh is rolling in his grave.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Jun 16, 2015 - 07:15am PT
Interesting stat....there was more precipitation in May of this year in the contiguous 48 states than in any month since records started being kept.
Many areas have been relieved of moderate to severe drought.....California being the exception.
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 16, 2015 - 08:10am PT
So it really doesn't matter how much goes abroad. If all of it stayed here it's still a bad investment.

It kinda goes to economic inefficiency in general, but it can't be too bad an investment for somebody, else no one would be doing it.

In the strange world of coincidences, the obvious question that is raised in my mind: What were the rain totals for Orange, L.A. & Riverside counties for the same period?

In the winter of 1915, southern California was experiencing a devastating drought that had drained area reservoirs to record low levels over more than three consecutive years, causing massive agricultural and ranching losses. Residents of San Diego County were so desperate that the city of San Diego hired a man called Charles Hatfield, known as "the Rainmaker" [later immortalized in song by Bob Dylan as The Rainman]. The city promised Hatfield $10,000 if he could make it rain significantly by the end of the year. Hatfield's venture was apparently a success, but it is not known what actually caused the massive floods that tore through the county beginning December 9, the day after he started his inconspicuous scheme.

More than thirty-nine inches (991 mm) of rain fell during the following month, and storms continued deluging the county well into early 1916. The area's rivers and streams rose to their highest recorded levels in years. More than 200 bridges were washed out, entire communities were swept away, levees collapsed, and valleys were inundated. All the bridges along the San Diego, Sweetwater and Otay rivers were washed out except for a rail bridge that was left standing alone with its ends missing. The earthen Otay Dam, several miles southeast of the Sweetwater on the Otay River, burst on January 27 sending a wall of water into southern Chula Vista. Flooding deposited so much sediment that the southern end of San Diego Bay was filled with it – much of the sand remains today in the form of shoals that must be periodically dredged to accommodate boat traffic


Sweetwater and the missing Otay Dams.


zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 16, 2015 - 08:52am PT
OK, one more.

WATER BATTLES REACH TO THE CLOUDS

The notorious "Rainbarrel Man"

“It’s actually stealing,” said state Sen. Jerry Sonnenberg, R-Sterling, a northeastern farming and ranching town on the plains, who voted against the rain barrel measure when it landed in the Agriculture, Natural Resources and Energy Committee he leads. “You might say, it’s a little bit of water, just a barrelful, how much damage could that do to someone downstream?”

But, he continued, “If it’s just a little bit, why wouldn’t we allow everyone to go to into 7-Eleven and take just one bottle of water, just a little bit?”


http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2015/jun/16/tp-water-battles-reach-to-the-clouds/
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 16, 2015 - 10:24am PT
Lorenzo writes:

"Irrigation water from any source in California is heavily subsidized by the federal government infrastructure in the form of the dams, canals, and basically free land to pump the water to."


Not here it isn't:


135 years ago, the guys who later founded Redlands formed a land and water company which bought the land under the future Big Bear Lake, and all the creeks flowing into Bear Valley. They then built a dam, and a series of flumes and pipes used to deliver water to irrigate all the agriculture around here.

They financed the project with their own money and that of investors. No tax dollars needed. I doubt anyone 135 years ago even considered something like this would be the responsibility of the government.

To this day, ag water here comes from that company. They're still in business. Redlands, Loma Linda, Highland, Oak Glen, Cherry Valley, Beaumont and Banning groves and orchards all get their water from them.

Not only did the Federal Government have absolutely nothing to do with this system, neither does State or Local Government.

I'd be surprised if this one is the only one like it in California.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jun 16, 2015 - 11:26am PT
@chaz

Big bear lake is an impressive exception. The lake holds 73,320 acre feet of water.

That's enough water to provide the city of LA for about 14 hours.


And the water improvement district no longer has any phobias about taking federal money.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jun 16, 2015 - 11:39am PT

Jun 16, 2015 - 07:11am PT
I'm not sure what unsubsidized rates or market rates means in terms of farming. Irrigation water from any source in California is heavily subsidized by the federal government infrastructure in the form of the dams, canals, and basically free land to pump the water to. Without the water it's desert and worthless. There is no possible way to have the users pay for what it cost and economically farm.

Sure if you roll back the clock 75 years. But in today's reality, no. The water infrastructure is already paid for, in large part. Except of course for net new delivery systems and repairs. Let the rate payers cover those costs, as we do in my water district.

Its moot, We are not going to go that route anyway, so clarification is useless. We will go the opposite and fully socialize the water table, top to bottom, within a generation.

And there ain't gonna be no canal to bring down Canadian water to douse desert lands in old Mexico.

DMT

C'mon.

The Feds have already pledged 190 million in drought relief and are tacking another 90 million on top of that for the drought in Western states. California takes the biggest chunk.

And those 'new delivery systems' you discount... Does that include the pipe from Lake Superior?

And water socialization ain't gonna happen. The best you can hope for is that agribusiness will become trillionaires from not growing crops. There is too much case law

zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 16, 2015 - 11:43am PT
Eminent Domain (not the white rapper)

90.40.010
Eminent domain by the United States.
The United States is hereby granted the right to exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire the right to the use of any water, to acquire or extinguish any rights, and to acquire any lands or other property, for the construction, operation, repairs to, maintenance or control of any plant or system of works for the storage, conveyance, or use of water for irrigation purposes, and whether such water, rights, lands or other property so to be acquired belong to any private party, association, corporation or to the state of Washington, or any municipality thereof; and such power of eminent domain shall be exercised under and by the same procedure as now is or may be hereafter provided by the law of this state for the exercise of the right of eminent domain by ordinary railroad corporations, except that the United States may exercise such right in the proper court of the United States as well as the proper state court.


[1905 c 88 § 1; RRS § 7408.]
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jun 16, 2015 - 12:09pm PT
Eminent domain isn't a solution. There are so many interlocking eminent domain claims that it goes nowhere. Water improvement districts and all sorts of other entities are given eminent domain rights even outside the district boundaries, that leads to water interests bogging down fighting each other.

Since Big Bear lake was mentioned, here's an eminent domain case where the San Bernadino district tried to procure the lake.

http://ca.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.19690220_0041215.CA.htm/qx

The towing iceberg solution sounds easier.
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 17, 2015 - 07:43am PT

A third of world's biggest groundwater basins are overstressed

Not just a local phenomenon.

The researchers found that the Arabian Aquifer System, an important water source for more than 60 million people, is the most overstressed in the world suffering rapid depletion with little or no sign of recharging.

The Indus Basin aquifer of northwestern India and Pakistan is the second-most overstressed, and the Murzuk-Djado Basin in northern Africa is third.

California's Central Valley, utilised heavily for agriculture and suffering rapid depletion, was slightly better off ..




http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/science/a-third-of-worlds-biggest-groundwater-basins-are-overstressed/articleshow/47706469.cms
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jun 17, 2015 - 08:40am PT
zBrown, is that eminent domain clause from the Magna Carta?

As to yer last post, when will the first war be fought over water?
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 17, 2015 - 11:18am PT
Any pipe to California will need to be damn huge - bigger than anything anyone's ever seen before - to make a dent in the water shortage here.

Captain Kirk figured something along the lines of the Alaska Pipeline would do. As big as that pipe is, it's only four-feet in diameter.




This is farm canal in Cornfield County, CA ( behind the Santa Nella Holiday Inn )


For scale, there's a dirt road running along both banks. A car would disappear if driven into it.

This thing moves a hell of a lot more water than anything Shatner ever dreamed of, and it's just one canal. Not even a big one. There are dozens - maybe hundreds - of these all over the Central Valley.



zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 17, 2015 - 11:33am PT
Reilly

I don't have a copy of the Carta (whoops, put the Carta befora the Magna) so I cannot say for sure. The date of the law is not apparent either.

Webpages are not, it seems, required by law or eminent domain to provide dates, so this is the best I can do (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=90.40

Chapter 90.40 RCW
WATER RIGHTS OF UNITED STATES

Complete Chapter


RCW Sections
90.40.010 Eminent domain by the United States.
90.40.020 Right to use water courses.
90.40.030 Notice and certificate, effect of.
90.40.040 Appropriation of water -- Title to beds and shores.
90.40.050 Reservation of needed lands -- Procedure.
90.40.060 Restrictions on sale of state lands within project.
90.40.070 Federal water users' association -- Exemption from fees.
90.40.080 Federal water users' association -- Records by county auditor.
90.40.090 Permit for Grand Coulee project.
90.40.100 Columbia Basin Project -- Water appropriated pursuant to RCW 90.40.030 -- Periodic renewal not required.

--

As to the war, I'd say soon.


son of stan

Boulder climber
San Jose CA
Jun 17, 2015 - 12:22pm PT
The quickest bang for the buck would be a stealth tunnel from the lower
American River Canyon into the bottom of Lake Tahoe. No pumping needed.


Also the quickest way to start a war with the residents around the lake
as it drained mysteriously and news of a giant artesian spring on the American R. became known.

Messages 1021 - 1040 of total 1730 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta