GFYS, gay marriage haters.

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 701 - 720 of total 745 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Jebus H Bomz

climber
Peavine Basecamp
Jul 11, 2013 - 12:58am PT
A polygamous anal orgy? Sheeeyah!

Kick 'n stick, buddy!
Jim Brennan

Trad climber
Vancouver Canada
Jul 11, 2013 - 01:02am PT
I'm not a liar usually (everyone is a liar) but I do believe in being yourself in public.

Bluering is a good man who justifiably should answer for his opinions. He does so whether anyone likes it or not.

Take 5, WES CHRISTIANSON.

bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Jul 11, 2013 - 01:05am PT
My problem, Steve, is bigots hiding behind fake nameS, spewing hate towards an entire group of people, and not being able to stand behind their words. If you don't like being hated for the sh#t you say, don't say it.

I stand behind everything I say. DO you? Who are you?
Dr. Christ

Mountain climber
State of Mine
Jul 11, 2013 - 01:16am PT
Burchery, honey, don't sweat it... we will work something out.
Dr. Christ

Mountain climber
State of Mine
Jul 11, 2013 - 01:23am PT
I'm not gonna lie... I've let myself go a bit.

Just remembered, my gf has dibs on the whole marriage thing. I'll see if she is still interested and let you know.
Bruce Kay

Gym climber
BC
Jul 11, 2013 - 01:23am PT
So, if I accept gay marriage then I'm no longer a bigot and am cool with you guys?

Think about it before answering.....

OK I'll bite. Sure. I think if you can accept that it would be difficult to say you are bigoted.

In order to accept gay marriage it would require a concerted acceptance of egalitarianism based on moral behavior as opposed to some sort of weird social class structure.

but thats just me. Did I fall into your trap?
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Jul 11, 2013 - 01:33am PT
In order to accept gay marriage it would require a concerted acceptance of egalitarianism based on moral behavior as opposed to some sort of weird social class structure.

but thats just me. Did I fall into your trap?


You did, but you didn't. Let me ask you this. is this really important right now????

Can the country and Congress focus? We're passing over 1,000 page Bills and we expect people to 'get that'?

And yet we focus on the f*#king gays.....or the blacks (Zimmerman trial).

Are people completely stupid? Someone help me.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Jul 11, 2013 - 01:39am PT
Jimmy is a good friend of mine, leave him out of this.

I am not Blublocker, or whatever the f*#k he's called. I am what I am.

What remains is who you are. Climbing pics? Anything?
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Jul 11, 2013 - 01:45am PT
This is the 3rd (?) time I've asked. Care to share your reason for not answering?


Answer what???

Trust me, I ain't Blubblocker. Or whatver, I don't play those games.
Jim Brennan

Trad climber
Vancouver Canada
Jul 11, 2013 - 01:48am PT
Wes, I'm not your proxy.

Get it right about the responsibility engendered about what you cherry pick. You have a PHD but you have a need for learning about the difference between objective and subjective. Just because you don't like the views of other people doesn't mean their objectivity is dismissible.

Where the marriage train falls off the rails is always at the same place all this bullshit arrives at. That is where the story based thinking collides with the facts.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Jul 11, 2013 - 01:52am PT
Get it right about the responsibility engendered of what you cherry pick. You have a PHD but you have a need for learning about the difference between what objective and subjective. Just because you don't like the views of the other people doesn't mean their objectivity is dismissible.

Where the marriage train falls of the rails is always at the same place all this bullshit arrives at. That is where the story based thinking collides with the facts.


That's one way of putting it, Jimmy. Well said too...
Jim Brennan

Trad climber
Vancouver Canada
Jul 11, 2013 - 01:54am PT
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Burchey, you must be some kind of wall climber ! ! !
Dr. Christ

Mountain climber
State of Mine
Jul 11, 2013 - 01:55am PT
Objective: If a person gets to choose the person they marry and legal rights are afforded to the married couple, then all people regardless of race or sex get to choose the person they marry and have the same legal rights afforded to them.

Subjective: I'm an ignorant bigot who thinks fags should not be allowed to marry because the Bible has 3 passages about homosexuality being bad.
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Topic Author's Reply - Jul 11, 2013 - 01:55am PT
Oh good, Bluering and Wes are arguing on this thread.

Way to kill the conversation, fellas.

You do this sh#t all the time.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Jul 11, 2013 - 02:01am PT
Objective: If one person gets to choose the person they marry and legal rights are afforded to the married couple, then all people regardless of race or sex get to choose the person they marry and have the same legal rights afforded to them.

NEWSFLASH!!! Asshole. Did you read my previous posts?

No, because you're a f*#king as#@&%e!

I said the FED should stay out of marriage, and let the Federalist States decide how to deal with it.

Ever hear of a Constitution? Federalist Papers? Venona Papers?

EDIT: I threw the Venona's out there just because I hate f*#king commies!
Bruce Kay

Gym climber
BC
Jul 11, 2013 - 02:02am PT
You did, but you didn't. Let me ask you this. is this really important right now????


Nice dodge fuktard. importance or priority or whatever was never implied. drop the bong.
Dr. Christ

Mountain climber
State of Mine
Jul 11, 2013 - 02:03am PT
I said the FED should stay out of marriage, and let the Federalist States decide how to deal with it.

Ever hear of a Constitution? Federalist Papers? Venona Papers?

Can states pass legislation that prevents people from getting married based on race? No. Then what in that tiny little sh#t smear brain of yours makes you think they can pass laws that prevent people from getting married based on sex?
Jim Brennan

Trad climber
Vancouver Canada
Jul 11, 2013 - 02:03am PT
Nicely stated about objectivity Wes.

Poorly condemned about what Bluering said.

He never said anything about denial for same sex marriage. He did say a LOT about same sex marriage being something a church didn't like.

I don't agree with what he said but if you want to be constitutionally aggressive you are going to have to take on the sentimentalist religions who have their rights enshrined as well.

Have a good one !
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Jul 11, 2013 - 02:05am PT
Nice dodge fuktard. importance or priority or whatever was never implied. drop the bong.

What am i dodging?
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Jul 11, 2013 - 02:10am PT
Can states pass legislation that prevents people from getting married based on race? No. Then what in that tiny little sh#t smear brain of yours makes you think they can pass laws that prevent people from getting married based on sex?


Now that is the crux, right? I'm mixed on Prop 8, but I see yer point! What you have to see is that is shouldn't be Fed, but a State Law as long as is doesn't infringe on the Bill Of Rights, or Constitution.

Ya know?
Messages 701 - 720 of total 745 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Trip Report and Articles
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews