Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 101 - 120 of total 132 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Oct 3, 2011 - 10:22pm PT
Weschrist writes:

"Uh... if government isn't going to restrict corporate greed, who is?"


In a free country, what business does the government have restricting anybody's *greed* ?
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Oct 3, 2011 - 10:41pm PT
This whole she-bang resulted from many things;

Fannie/Freddie basically forcing banks to give loans to losers.

The repeal of the Glass-Stiegal Act.

Reapealing the 'uptick rule' in bond/stock trading. (A big one!!!).

Short selling.


In short, yeah, there needs to be regulations in a free-market system. But to pin this on rich right-wingers is misguided. The lefties soak the system and the rules just as much.

Put the regs back into place. Wealthy people create jobs. Let them continue to do so. It's the traders who are f*#king us!
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Oct 3, 2011 - 10:44pm PT
I think it's pretty clear from watching the rapid economic rise of East Asia that state managed capitalism is far more efficient than the individualistic laisez faire version practiced in America. It doesn't matter if it is managed by the left (China) or the right (Singapore) or moderately democratic, center leaning, right regimes (South Korea, Japan, Taiwan), what's important is having professional economists running the country instead of hack politicians backed by selfish and greedy corporate interest who care only for their own welfare and that of their company and not the country and its people as a whole.

All of these successful economies also level the playing field by government sponsored basic services to their citizens such as education and health care.
Dr.Sprock

Boulder climber
I'm James Brown, Bi-atch!
Oct 3, 2011 - 10:45pm PT
only smart people should breed.

no wait, i sound like hank jr

global warming is gonna kick everybody's ass, so screw politics because...




































































your gonna die!

bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Oct 3, 2011 - 10:47pm PT
what's important is having professional economists running the country instead of hack politicians backed by selfish and greedy corporate interest who care only for their own welfare and that of their company and not the country and its people as a whole.

Like Paul Krugman???
dirtbag

climber
Oct 3, 2011 - 10:49pm PT
Glad you agree that Krugman should have a greater role.

;-)
ms55401

Trad climber
minneapolis, mn
Oct 3, 2011 - 10:50pm PT
punkz!!!
Dr.Sprock

Boulder climber
I'm James Brown, Bi-atch!
Oct 3, 2011 - 10:50pm PT
oh yeah, lets bring back warren greenspan,
Dr.Sprock

Boulder climber
I'm James Brown, Bi-atch!
Oct 3, 2011 - 10:53pm PT
sorry, i meant alex greenspoon
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Oct 3, 2011 - 11:01pm PT
The top 10% have 80% to 90% of stocks, bonds, trust funds, and business equity...

And they just lost their asses in the past 2-weeks. Is it becuase of them of gov't lack of policy? Uncertainty due to lack of leadership and misguided Keynesian policy?

Or is it because of stout leadership and faith in markets?

The man in the WH breathes uncertainty and distrust of our current direction.

EDIT: Greenspan was a putz too.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Oct 4, 2011 - 01:35am PT
"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."




Lovegas,

Right on!




OK SuperTopians, let's take a moment for a teach-in. We have a great teachable moment here. Let's not waste it.


What's going on for real?




Occupy U.S.A., with Jeff Madrick - Countdown with Keith Olbermann (Prof./Author of The Age of Greed)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x621442
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0o1DpNSkpc

Moore From The Street, with Michael Moore:Countdown with Keith Olbermann
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x621447
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXVz3378pcQ

Tomorrow the World? with Michael Moore - Countdown with Keith Olbermann
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x621452
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXJcjonMckY

OccupyWallStreet Protester - DESTROYS - Fox News Reporter!!!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x621083
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yrT-0Xbrn4




The Bible on the Poor
or, Why God is a liberal
http://www.zompist.com/meetthepoor.html



Luke 12:48 (KJV)
" . . . For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more."
Karl Baba

Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
Oct 4, 2011 - 02:21am PT
Crack wrote

This is the total credit market debt from 1920 on as a percent of GDP (so it is inflation adjusted). You see, all Wall Street does is peddle whatever we produce. Unfortunately our main export in the last 25 years has been debt.

It's more complicated than that. Wall Street Created much extra debt without responsibility by loaning to people who couldn't afford it, telling them housing was only going to appreciate, and then offloading that risk from themselves by securitizing it, and then further leveraging with CDOs. They sold that crap to other suckers who had no way of knowing what was truly inside those securities and the credit-worthiness of those loans were lied about. This was made possible by deregulation, greed and often Fraud. (Cooking the loan books and much more)

The biggest culprit here is the Fed though - the steepest sections of this graph correlate strongly with very low interest rate regimes. What banks do makes very good sense in the context of the sandbox they are given. Right now there is no incentive to even take deposits - it is cheaper to borrow at a negative effective rate from the Fed and loan it back to the Government to misallocate, which leads to recession after recession.

I'm all for getting rid of the Fed, which you will note is NOT a government body and is comprised of Banksters! It's an insane and crude scam that Banks are able to take the gift that they have given themselves by having a negative effective rate and milking it at the people's (Government's) expense while not loaning to the people. Yes the structure is wrong. It should be changed but don't blame government. Government not truly existing is the problem. Private industry deregulated has already proven more corrupt.

Government is screwed up here because they have been bought GOP and DEM alike by big business and are populated by a revolving door of big Wall Street criminals like Larry Summers and Geitner and the rest, All former executives of the same firms that sodomized the country.

So yeah, I'm critical of Government too, but getting rid of government isn't the answer, it's already been done by selling out to Wall Street control which is why nobody went to jail for the 2008 crisis while LOTS of people went to Jail for the S&L crisis back during the First Bush days.

Which brings up a another point. Seems like there is this Boom Bust cycle, that seems engineered by Wall Street and the Fed that always manages to bust right at the end of a presidential term limit. Doesn't matter whether it's GOP or DEM. Dotcom busted after Clinton, housing busted at the end of Bush, Carter went out with a Bust, and then the S&L.

And after all these busts, the super-rich last-guys-standing, who have made bank on the boom, buy up all the losers in the bust.

Just watch it

Peace

Karl
Dr.Sprock

Boulder climber
I'm James Brown, Bi-atch!
Oct 4, 2011 - 04:04am PT
karl, how many chicks?

Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Oct 4, 2011 - 09:01am PT
Want to know the background of what happened to us financially?

Want to know why people are marching and protesting?



Inside Job - Download the FULL Movie

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xekoka_inside-job-download-the-full-movie_shortfilms


Good short review of the movie:
http://www.sbs.com.au/films/movie/7817/Inside-Job-


If you haven't seen this movie yet, then you must. There were 2 9-11s. One near the beginning of Bush's time in office and then the economic 9-11 right at the end. Gee, both on his watch. Who would of thunk? What are the odds of that?
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Oct 4, 2011 - 09:38am PT
Good grief, here we go with the “general welfare” clause again as if the whole Constitution were spun around it. It is one of six clauses in a perambulatory statement explaining why the actual document was written. And while yes, it is there, it is clearly the most softly stated of the six, beginning as it does with the word “promote.” Read it again if you will.

Each of the other five clauses is stated with more assertive language, for example “provide for the common defense.” To form…, establish…, insure…, provide…, and finally to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity” are all more definitive statements. To promote does not mean to insure or to provide or to establish or to secure.
dirtbag

climber
Oct 4, 2011 - 09:57am PT
Yeah, the preamble doesn't really mean much.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Oct 4, 2011 - 10:08am PT
I didn't say it doesn't mean much. I just think the words are very carefully chosen. I like words and think they have meaning.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Oct 4, 2011 - 10:18am PT
Then there's the little problem of the tenth amendment that overides all that proceeds.
spidey

Trad climber
Berkeley CA
Oct 4, 2011 - 12:29pm PT
+1 for Inside Job - watched it last night, gives a great explanation for what really happened with interviews with the banksters, footage from congressional testimony, interviews with economists, etc.

Even the professional economists are in on it. They all get paid by the banksters too.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Oct 4, 2011 - 12:56pm PT
The French Revolution is the template for all mob uprisings, and the signal event of that lunacy was an attack on a prison housing only half a dozen prisoners.

As best anyone can tell, the storming of the Bastille was instigated by a rumor that the laughably impotent King Louis XVI was about to stage an attack on the National Assembly. Or perhaps they were upset that the inept finance minister, Jacques Necker, had been fired. Or they thought the Bastille was an eyesore.

(The only other possible cause was recently ruled out when it was conclusively determined that France had no teachers unions in the late 18th century.)

No one is sure -- but a good time was had by all! Except the prison administrators murdered in the attack.

Liberals love mobs because rioting and anarchy is their path to power.

Making sound proposals based on facts and logic is not their metier. Issuing impossible promises to the easily fooled is their specialty. For more on this, see "The 2012 Democratic Platform."

The entire Democratic Party is currently promising to "save" Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in their present form. According to Obama's own Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, in less than 10 years, spending on those three entitlement programs, plus servicing the national debt, will consume 92 cents of every dollar in the federal budget.

The Democrats are openly lying to voters. It is a mathematical impossibility for these programs to continue without major reform now, or complete bankruptcy later -- and not very much later.

But Democrats' real achievement has been in destroying the family, and thereby creating an endless supply of potential rioters.

When blacks were only four generations out of slavery, their illegitimacy rate was about 23 percent (lower than the white illegitimacy rate is now). Then Democrats decided to help them! Barely two generations since LBJ's Great Society programs began, the black illegitimacy rate has tripled to 72 percent.

Meanwhile, the white illegitimacy rate has septupled, from 4 percent to 29 percent.

Instead of a "War on Poverty," it should have been called a "War on the Family."

The vast and permanent underclass created by the welfare state is a great success story for the Democratic Party, which now has a loyal constituency of deadbeats who automatically vote for the Democrats to keep their Trojan horse "benefits" flowing.

It's the Democrats' "heroin dealer" model of government.

Apparently, it takes a lot of government workers to minister to the poor, inasmuch as government employment has skyrocketed in tandem with the family's disintegration. As long as Democrats are serving their principal constituency -- recipients of taxpayer money -- they don't care what happens to the rest of society.

They champion any mob that will increase their political power. Liberals promote welfare dependency, class warfare, endless government programs staffed with public sector workers, street protests, coddling criminals and physical attacks on their ideological opponents. This is how they create reliable Democratic voters.

True, government employees are doing jobs we don't want done, can never be fired, are bankrupting the country and periodically break out in mob violence.

True, also, that the children of broken families sometimes burn city blocks to the ground or kill their great-grandmothers with swords. But what a voting bloc!


http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-08-17.html
Messages 101 - 120 of total 132 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta