"NANOOK" is now a verb

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 20 of total 29 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Tom

Big Wall climber
San Luis Obispo CA
Topic Author's Original Post - May 23, 2006 - 06:06am PT
The General Consensus is that this is a new word:


NANOOK: V.; to retrobolt a rivet ladder to make it more safe; to downgrade a drilled wall pitch to make it more safe; to remove the excitement of a rivet pitch by placing more secure anchors; to cross the line between safety and excitement on a wall by excessively drilling when repairing old anchors; to irritate old climbers by forgetting that they were there first; to replace more dangerous rivets with more secure bolts, as on a route that should be considered dangerous (and not for Gumby) from the ground to the summit; to be overly attentive to the safety of others, without recognizing that a lack of safety is a valuable trait of a wall climb.

dirtineye

Trad climber
the south
May 23, 2006 - 08:55am PT
Nanook of the North was a child's story about an eskimo, a long long time ago.
Robb

Social climber
Flathead Valley, Montana
May 23, 2006 - 11:02am PT
Nanook also took care of that fur trapper who was strictly from commercial.
handsome B

Gym climber
Saskatoon, Saskatchawan
May 23, 2006 - 11:13am PT
Nanooked (na-new'-ke-ed'): verb: To restore a rivet ladder to the level of safety experienced by the first ascent. (Also see "Wings of Steel" Z-Mac holding 40 foot falls when first drilled: pg.354 sec. M23)
This definition is only applicable to aid climbing, an outdated form of ascent circa. 1972.
dirtineye

Trad climber
the south
May 23, 2006 - 11:32am PT
So how did it get from a beloved eskimo's name to an aid term?
TradIsGood

Trad climber
Gunks end of country
May 23, 2006 - 01:40pm PT
Replacing with 1/4" x 1" plated steel Rawl split-shaft death anchors.

Nanook or not?

Is nanooking relative or absolute or both?
'Pass the Pitons' Pete

Big Wall climber
like Oakville, Ontario, Canada, eh?
May 23, 2006 - 02:00pm PT
Isn't "nanook" eskimo for polar bear? It is Erik's Valley nickname.
dirtineye

Trad climber
the south
May 23, 2006 - 02:03pm PT
[url]http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=nanook&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8[/url]
Karl Baba

Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
May 23, 2006 - 03:48pm PT
"Nanooked (na-new'-ke-ed'): verb: To restore a rivet ladder to the level of safety experienced by the first ascent. (Also see "Wings of Steel" Z-Mac holding 40 foot falls when first drilled: pg.354 sec. M23)
This definition is only applicable to aid climbing, an outdated form of ascent circa. 1972."

Exactly. When the adventure of a climb depends on the status of somebody else old drilled pro, it's time to redefine what your climbing is about.

If that stuff needs to be replaced it should be replaced to last. Thanks to Nanook for the public service

Respect but not agreement to those who feel otherwise

Peace

Karl
dirtineye

Trad climber
the south
May 23, 2006 - 03:52pm PT
So, it's callend Nanooked because a guy nicknaned Nanook followed the procedure outlined above?

Fascinating captain.

Good, I can sleep now!

Darnell

Big Wall climber
Chicago
May 23, 2006 - 04:55pm PT
*yawn*
golsen

Social climber
kennewick, wa
May 23, 2006 - 05:24pm PT
Tom,
just curious here. In another thread you mentioned finding many old 1/4 inch bolts that you wanted to get rid of. In this one you mention some guy who seems to get lots of flak on this site for replacing mank with good stuff. Having placed some of those old 1/4 inchers I know when I place one I have some degree of confidence in them. Now spin back 25 years and stare one in the face. We now know they are not good. What seems to be the problem with replacing the mank with good stuff?

Just curious. I tend to agree with Karl,
"When the adventure of a climb depends on the status of somebody else old drilled pro, it's time to redefine what your climbing is about."
lost

climber
truckee
May 23, 2006 - 09:31pm PT
Correct me if I am wrong, but is not the point of a bolt or rivet to make upward progress and even safe at that? I do understand a good portion of you desk jockies do require some sort of stimulation from your day to day cube dwellings, but I would think it a waste of time to put 'shit' sh#t into the rock.
dirtineye

Trad climber
the south
May 23, 2006 - 09:36pm PT
Lost, the old sh!t was the new sh!t back before we had todays good sh!t, and so people like to give sh!t for messing with the sh!t some old sh!t used when he was in the sh!t.

But it's not the same old sh!t.

Does that help?
Gabe

climber
San Clemente, CA
May 23, 2006 - 09:45pm PT
This has been beaten, or is it a tempest in a teapot? :)

I feel the point is to retain the vision the FA had when repairing a climb. This means you need to talk to the FA if possible. If not, find out how the climbing comunity feels about the bolts/rivets you are about to replace or chop on your project. That seems to be more in the spirit of giving back than just doing what you alone feel is right. The routes are for evrybody who may want to climb them. Am I oversimplifying it? Gabe
Tom

Big Wall climber
San Luis Obispo CA
Topic Author's Reply - May 23, 2006 - 10:27pm PT
just curious here. In another thread you mentioned finding many old 1/4 inch bolts that you wanted to get rid of.

I showed the box of old bolts to demonstrate what used to be used for belays and other anchors. I don't recall saying I was trying to get rid of them, except in a later post when I said I would sell them for $100 each.
hobo

climber
PDX
May 23, 2006 - 10:35pm PT
verbing weirds language.


Name the reference to the quote above, and ill buy some beer and drink it with you if i see you this summer.
billygoat

climber
3hrs to El Cap Meadow, 1.25hrs Pinns, 42min Castle
May 23, 2006 - 10:35pm PT
What Gabe said. At least somebody in this forum has a sense of respect for those that created.

Here's how to use this sentence: I climbed Ten Days After two weeks ago and was disappointed to find it got nanooked.
golsen

Social climber
kennewick, wa
May 23, 2006 - 11:43pm PT
well, thanks for satisfying my curiousity. Really.
Minerals

Social climber
The Deli
May 24, 2006 - 12:03am PT
Hey, Mike… You mean THIS terrace??? The one at the base of Kaos?

Note 12-inch yellow ruler at left for scale. The dark, sub-horizontal line above the ruler represents the original surface level of the base; material was removed by Erik Sloan to ‘flatten’ the area, thus exposing 12 to 20 inches of the wall. “Manufacturing” details can be found on various threads in this forum. Photo taken October 2005.




This “terrace” has existed for a while now (a few years). I saw Sloan at the base not long after the manufactured bivy site appeared. My bros and I moved random boulders back to the flat area to make it look more natural. I told Erik this at the time that I saw him, but he simply replied that it wouldn’t take much effort to move the boulders again. And that was that. To this day, the site is still flat.

Anyone who has spent much time at the base remembers what it used to look like – a chaotic assemblage of talus that had fallen from above. There never was a smooth pathway between the start of Kaos and the start of Zenyatta; you had to scramble over random boulders. But now, it is all ‘humanized’ – changed/altered/compromised, just like what has happened to our wall routes. What is the point of all of this? Why do we need another man-made flat spot at the base of El Cap when there are several natural ones to either side… the base of the Trip, the Surgeon, etc…???

I believe that Sloan was also cited by NPS for recklessly trundling random boulders and blocks off of the ledge system that leads from the first belay of the Trip to El Cap Tree. What was the point of this – to CREATE a safer climbing environment? Is safety the climber’s responsibility, or the responsibility of the guidebook authors? Was the base ‘cleared’ before this trundling incident occurred? How much was Sloan fined? Was this a ‘responsible’ act?

I have nothing personal against Erik. I just strongly disagree with what he has done to our climbing resources in Yosemite. His actions are nothing more than irresponsible and they endanger our freedoms as climbers with respect to land managers. Donny Reid never screwed things up for the rest of us…




Thanks for your good words, brother Gabe. Glad to see that some climbers are still thinking clearly… As for the rest, all I can express is total disappointment. Do you people even know what REAL aid climbing is all about??? I seriously wonder.


-Bryan
Messages 1 - 20 of total 29 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta