SpaceX to send privately crewed spacecraft beyond Moon

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 72 of total 72 in this topic
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Original Post - Feb 27, 2017 - 05:26pm PT
http://www.spacex.com/news/2017/02/27/spacex-send-privately-crewed-dragon-spacecraft-beyond-moon-next-year
Studly

Trad climber
WA
Feb 27, 2017 - 05:49pm PT
I'll believe it when I see it happen.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Feb 27, 2017 - 07:26pm PT
Can I buy gift cards?
jgill

Boulder climber
The high prairie of southern Colorado
Feb 27, 2017 - 08:42pm PT
A year or so ago the Tesla sedan with Ludicrous Option did 0 to 60 in 2.8 seconds. I think there's a faster one now. Also up to 360 miles or so on a charge. Enough there to break Earth's gravitational pull! Go for it!
WBraun

climber
Feb 27, 2017 - 08:47pm PT
Those stoopid people don't even know there is no escape by mechanical means.

You can never buy your way to paradise ......
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 27, 2017 - 09:26pm PT
In another article, it was stated that the price being paid has not been disclosed, but is probably equivalent to what the Russians charge for a civilian seat on a Soyuz up to the ISS. About 7-8 years ago, that ride was costing $22 Million, but the Russians now want $80 Million apiece to fly our astronauts to the ISS.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Sands Motel , Las Vegas
Feb 27, 2017 - 09:32pm PT
Good to see you post Roger...Maybe we can have a supertopo benefit to fly braun one way...?
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Feb 27, 2017 - 09:33pm PT


Yuuuck. Rich people doing rich people things.

F u c k o f f

+1
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 28, 2017 - 01:29am PT
Pretty much says everything that's wrong with capitalism unrestrained by appropriate government oversight and a near total lack of concern for society at large. As a nation and society you know you have your priorities in order when you spend a several hundred million dollars sending a couple of clowns to the moon while our education system suffers enormous student / teacher ratios, most families are one serious illness away from economic ruin, and our national infrastructure is in tatters.

But at least there's an easy fix - up military spending ten percent for completely unknown reasons and slash domestic spending. Yeah, that's the fix.
clinker

Trad climber
Santa Cruz, California
Feb 28, 2017 - 06:10am PT
healyje, should we shut down Hollywood, except for producing documentaries?

The money spent will be for many good paying jobs. Yes, we need to get our priorities in much better alignment. Fix what is bad but don't sell this type of progress as bad, otherwise what is the point of improving our education?

A better future for our students will start with an idea, hope or dream.

I don't begrudge those that make their money from innovation or entertainment. Those that make fortunes off the the backs of others, such as Wells Fargo type bankers or the epi-pen patent producers who jacked up the price because people needed their product to live, should be scrubbing toilets and floors at our schools and prisons, for community service.
Slabby D

Trad climber
B'ham WA
Feb 28, 2017 - 08:28am PT
We all just paid for a couple rich f*#ks to fly around the moon while Elon Musk makes a nice tidy profit. This country is f*#ked in the head. I seriously hope that capsule suffers a depressurization in the deep cold darkness of space.

From the Space X press release-

"Most importantly, we would like to thank NASA, without whom this would not be possible. NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, which provided most of the funding for Dragon 2 development, is a key enabler for this mission."
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 28, 2017 - 08:30am PT
I have a more historical viewpoint on this. Much of the progress in the early days of aviation was made by philanthropic prizes to "winners" of various trophies in competitions. Almost all the accomplishments were spurred by that old demon: Money. Glenn Curtiss built many of his innovative airplanes to win cash prizes. Lindbergh flew across the Atlantic solo--for a cash prize. The "2 clowns going around the Moon," may be doing it for a much more altruistic reason than just having fun. They are just getting something for their contribution to society in general. This certainly has the "blessing" of NASA, at least according to their press releases, anyway. It's just playing a game with higher stakes than most of us can afford. I'm sure that were Howard Hughes still alive, he's be involved with it, too.

Edit: In response to Slabby D: The Dragon spacecraft was built for a NASA contract to haul astronauts to and from the ISS. This was a fixed price contract, and not one of the sleazy "cost-plus" deals normally awarded the "big boys." Fixed price. This essentially saves NASA $160 Million for a crew change each flight accomplished to ISS, and is the only way back for many of the science experiments. We the people age getting more return on our dollars this way BEFORE SpaceX utilizes the technology THEY developed to make a few bucks.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 28, 2017 - 08:56am PT
What disappointing replies.

You'd think we were a bunch of knitters instead of climbers.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 28, 2017 - 09:36am PT
Your hands appear to be more suited to knitting and there is zero evidence you climb.... Bon Voyage, space cowboy. -DMT


We're the same age, within a year.
When you want to square off CLIMBING, let me know.

and I'll turn on my PM.

You're the epitome here of a kind of superficial Trumpism that
I would love to see humbled (if not humiliated).
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 28, 2017 - 09:54am PT
Your hands appear to be more suited to knitting and there is zero evidence you climb.... Bon Voyage, space cowboy. -DMT

Climbing. Or Skiing. Or Mountain running. Or...

For that matter. Name your game, Smartass.


It's a simple thing, really. Put up or shut up.
At least in regards to me.


Hello?


CLIMBING? Trad? High Sierra? Sport? Gym?
I'm one of the lucky ones... I enjoy them all, I badmouth
none of them.

FYI: I'm out of the office in one minute. But I'll
be back in a few hours.
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Feb 28, 2017 - 10:16am PT
Likely a pipe dream but it'd be a great success if they can pull it off.

I hope they do. There's no reason they couldn't.

They can get much better pictures of the ark.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 28, 2017 - 12:31pm PT
They are just getting something for their contribution to society in general.

Seriously?
eeyonkee

Trad climber
Golden, CO
Feb 28, 2017 - 01:25pm PT
Your hands appear to be more suited to knitting and there is zero evidence you climb.
Unnecessarily mean. Just sayin'.
John Duffield

Mountain climber
New York
Feb 28, 2017 - 01:45pm PT
They can get much better pictures of the ark.

healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 28, 2017 - 02:09pm PT
Who is that masked man?
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 28, 2017 - 02:14pm PT
Anger. Bitterness. Cynicism. Runs amok at S-T. And the main reason I don't hang out here much, anymore.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 28, 2017 - 02:24pm PT
I do not start it... and I do not make it personal in the way you do so often... a very long time ago you and wb set the stage the tone among the three of us. My criticism above was not personalized like yours so often tends to be...

Anonymity is irrelevant on an off topic thread dealing with science. It is the idea that is the important thing. Ad ideam.

But I'm fine with this. As you say... whatever.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Feb 28, 2017 - 03:25pm PT
soo when the "spaceeagle" or whatever they are going to name it..... gets stuck in moon orbit and the return rocket malfunctions. Will these fools get a refund?

all the while back on earth... we will be entertained with the whole spectacle of the last words and goodbys for the dying????

much like Everest?

Mighty Hiker

climber
Outside the Asylum
Feb 28, 2017 - 03:58pm PT
Assuming that a gravity slingshot maneuver is planned - much the most energy/weight efficient - the spacecraft can't go much further past the moon than did the Apollo missions, that is 100 - 200 km. Going into orbit around the moon, and then returning to Earth, would be a greater challenge.

For future longer-duration space missions, will the tendency be to select humans who are smaller/lighter, on the basis that they require less food, water, and oxygen, and so less mass? This would probably exclude both Greg and me.
eeyonkee

Trad climber
Golden, CO
Feb 28, 2017 - 04:09pm PT
I tell you Roger, I would be more interested except for my life-long propensity for bad motion sickness. Really. If you have it, you understand. I'm fine just being a Tang drinker and hanging out on the home planet.
Studly

Trad climber
WA
Feb 28, 2017 - 04:37pm PT

They need to figure out how to get through the Van Allen radiation belts first in order to make it to the moon. Which goes to prove the largest hoax in history?

[Click to View YouTube Video]
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 28, 2017 - 04:39pm PT
I just got back to my laptop.

Dingus, my apologies as well. I value your presence here.
perswig

climber
Feb 28, 2017 - 05:02pm PT
Just wanted to point out the second Zoolander reference on ST in 24 hours.
Who says the forum's not relevant anymore?

Dale
Studly

Trad climber
WA
Feb 28, 2017 - 05:13pm PT


Hansel: So I'm rappelling down Mount Vesuvius when suddenly I slip, and I start to fall. Just falling, ahh ahh, I'll never forget the terror. When suddenly I realize "Holy sh#t, Hansel, haven't you been smoking Peyote for six straight days, and couldn't some of this maybe be in your head?"

Derek Zoolander: And?

Hansel: And it was. I was totally fine. I've never even been to Mount Vesuvius.
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Feb 28, 2017 - 05:25pm PT
I get it.

Space exploration isn't just about adventure (although that should be enough for climbers to value it), it's about contributing to our understanding of the universe and creating new technology that filters down to everyday life.

Computers would be decades behind where they are now without the space program. And that's just one example. Materials. Communications. etc.

Then there's the environmental and atmospheric science.

SpaceX is figuring out how to build rockets that will save the US taxpayer money to get astronauts and cargo into space. They have a contract to fly cargo and people to the ISS. They will use the tech developed for that for this moon trip. The taxpayer isn't paying for the trip.

So some rich guys get to have an awesome adventure. People complain. Then they drive their cars to go climbing. Shouldn't they be donating their gas money to underprivileged people? Or is it fine to spend $50 climbing, but spending $100 million is morally wrong? That's like saying a $50 prostitute is fine, but a $1000 hooker is immoral.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 28, 2017 - 05:37pm PT
Regarding Van Allen belt radiation; the Earth to Moon departure screams through VAB in minutes when doing 20,000 mph or thereabouts. That's primarily alpha particle radiation, from which the body can easily recover/repair itself.

Bone decalcification won't be an issue, since this flight will take around 9 days round trip.

Incidentally, I'm now working on a SBIR solicitation for bone decalcification studies, and NASA has asked for proposals.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 28, 2017 - 05:47pm PT
Anders-

This mission is simply a free return trajectory just beyond the moon, and no orbit is included. It should be a wild ride! The amount of money being charged should allow SpaceX to complete development of the Dragon 2 capsule with NO more NASA funds involved.

SpaceX charges $98 Million for a Falcon Heavy launch, which is what this will be. It's a win-win-win for SpaceX, the 2 pioneers, and yes, the U.S. Taxpayers.

SpaceX is leasing their launch pads at Cape Canaveral, which goes to the U.S. Treasury.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 28, 2017 - 05:54pm PT
As an addendum-

The trajectory is planned to take these guys 400,000 miles from Earth, so they'll have the first view of the Earth and Moon from the farthest man has flown from Earth,; what a sight that would be. So--they'll see the moon about the size we do AGAINST the Earth as the backdrop. Wow! Only $80 Million to be the first to see that?
nah000

climber
no/w/here
Feb 28, 2017 - 06:10pm PT
the Fet: thanks for making that argument better than i would have.

considering that some of the other options for those with 88 million [or whatever the amount was] burning a hole in their pocket, includes super yachts, penthouses atop phallic towers, and all of the hookers and blow for a lifetime, i can't say i really understand the hate being sent towards those funding a space program and getting a front row seat along the way.

sure they could have donated it to the fight for cancer or some such, but i gotta admit i'm not sure which i find more disgusting: 88 million westerners eating an extra patty on a cheeseburger sometime this week or some dude/tte spending 88 million on funding a space program and getting preferred seating.

this human created world is too wholistically and intrinsically unjust for me to get too bent out of shape by an expensive joyride that will continue to expand human knowledge of our mechanistic potential.
MH2

Boulder climber
Andy Cairns
Feb 28, 2017 - 06:49pm PT
they'll see the moon about the size we do AGAINST the Earth as the backdrop. Wow! Only $80 Million to be the first to see that?


Well, you could send out a camera, instead.



But I do not intend to cast aspersions. Quite the opposite.



These 2 people should pay a little more and land on the Moon. If they want to pay to get back, too, well that's okay, but I hear that there are people willing to go one way to Mars, so why not the Moon?


It could make good programming. Here they are in their dome, trying to grow hydroponic tomatoes, prospecting for water, thinking up ways to kill each other. It could be poignant, poetic, helpful to manned space exploration, and karmic payback for Laika.


Okay, enough fun. I respect Rodger.


Kalimon

Social climber
Ridgway, CO
Feb 28, 2017 - 06:55pm PT
this human created world is too wholistically and intrinsically unjust for me to get too bent out of shape by an expensive joyride that will continue to expand human knowledge of our mechanistic potential.

Poetry for the consciousness!

WBraun

climber
Feb 28, 2017 - 07:09pm PT
This is modern science.

They'll take peoples hard earned money and throw out into space.

And .... that money ain't yours to throw into space.

It belongs to this planet to take care of its humanity.

And you just throw it away out into space peoples hard earned money ......
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 28, 2017 - 09:15pm PT
A few more details have surfaced. There will be an unmanned flight first as a proof of concept and as a test of equipment. The price is actually closer to $35 Million per person. So...Moose! If you can get $100 Million, we can BOTH go and spend the rest on wine. Close quarters in the capsule, though. Do you fart a lot?
ß Î Ø T Ç H

Boulder climber
ne'er–do–well
Feb 28, 2017 - 11:09pm PT
I wouldn'd get too excited just yet.
Studly

Trad climber
WA
Feb 28, 2017 - 11:28pm PT
There has to be a unmanned flight as no human has been through the Van Allen radiation belt.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Feb 28, 2017 - 11:31pm PT
All I can say is that if I had $35M in discretionary spending money laying around, the very last thing I would do is sign up for a ride on that thing.

Of course it's probably safer than the cars I'd buy...
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Mar 1, 2017 - 12:38am PT
¥
for each there is a button,

It's so easy, we made it so easy for ? for ?

We have fallen to subsitance living

If we have more we use more

when we should have risen to save and share.

Every one wants just a little ketchup,

A There is a thing for that feeling ,

Everyone finds their own thing

That Thing, masks feelings

that thing, helps you forget,

that something is missing

find and step on

move up and past,,

Organized death verses won't save your soul

Nor will Elon Musk,

Anyone now still buying moon shots!?

Will have China to answer to . . , I don't follow the space bs, ya got that ,
But, um . . . China !! ,the moon!
By August !?

for each there is a musthava-givvetomee




Broke you are missing the point

This space exploration gambit is as if it were an opiod for the very rich.
They ,you? Think that there is escape, and if there is escape may-be there is a place to go

Why what would it hurt to clean up after the mess we've made here on our own one planet first?

Let's get on board and save, n' Re-Save.

Save our planet

Earth!

There is no escape

, the science that says there is is fake

If we could go,? You would ?

Would you jump . . If I told you to smoke this . .

I can think of more stupid Shjt

that was fun that I was told

To Do, it fun , it's science !

If you could blast off,

you would go straight to hell

as a privaledge by science

No

we climbers would not

A cat from here

who won't fess up what he climbs or where ?

says com on I challenge you?

I'll up for for that ~ I'm down a pound or two

Your always weak sauce ,

never showing a climbing shot of yourself?

Show what ya got

So few pictures of this gnome have come to light!

Any body hold'n' ?
IWas a short fuzzy thing . . .[Click to View YouTube Video] I'll not be Gettin' on board
There is a way to distract the best and the brightest away from saving the planet,
It has userped the name and the whole game
When at first they said it was in the name of??
That is when we should have known
In the name of. . . . Fill in the blank
In the name of -- "Great Deciever"-- it is no science
It's fiction
Am I getting thru?
Is there a place to go
Yes from the great ditch to the rent in the earth a mile deep
We can only stay live and die on planet
Earth!
£





xx



Retry

Broke you are missing the point

This space exploration gambit is as if it were an opiod for the very rich.
They ,you? Think that there is escape, and if there is escape may-be there is a place to go

Why what would it hurt to clean up after the mess we've made here on our own one planet first?

Let's get on board and save, n' Re-Save.

Save our planet

Earth!

There is no escape

, the science that says there is is fake

If we could go,? You would ?

Would you jump . . If I told you to smoke this . .

I can think of more stupid Shjt

that was fun that I was told

To Do, it fun , it's science !

If you could blast off,

you would go straight to hell

as a privaledge by science

No

we climbers would not

A cat from here

who won't fess up what he climbs or where ?

says com on I challenge you?

I'll up for for that ~ I'm down a pound or two

Your always weak sauce ,

never showing a climbing shot of yourself?

Show what ya got

So few pictures of this gnome have come to light!

Any body hold'n' ?
IWas a short fuzzy thing . . .[youtube=_,,,,, I'll not be Gettin' on board
There is a way to distract the best and the brightest away from saving the planet,
It has userped the name and the whole game
When at first they said it was in the name of??
That is when we should have known
In the name of. . . . Fill in the blank
In the name of -- "Great Deciever"-- it is no science
It's fiction
Am I getting thru?
Is there a place to go
Yes from the great ditch to the rent in the earth a mile deep
We can only stay live and die on planet
Earth!
df
S

Tripped , no not that way, over the kids shoes, slapped the tablet hard against the wall the touch screen is touchy

Does it help if you think of it as a song ?
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Mar 1, 2017 - 01:24am PT
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Mar 1, 2017 - 06:52am PT
And .... that money ain't yours to throw into space.

It belongs to this planet to take care of its humanity.

Part of taking care of humanity is finding more blue rocks to infect.

This one ain't gonna last forever.

Without warp "engines" though... we won't get to those distant blue rocks but there's still so much to learn in the local neighborhood.

And as a pastime or passion, it beats killing each other down here.
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Mar 1, 2017 - 07:54am PT
There has to be a unmanned flight as no human has been through the Van Allen radiation belt.

THE KILLER ELECTRONS ARE COMING !! Hahahahahaha.

Curt
Ferretlegger

Trad climber
san Jose, CA
Mar 1, 2017 - 08:14am PT
I have HUGE respect for Elon Musk, but i am afraid that this may be an overreach. This trip is like free soloing El Cap. Granted that there is less training and skills, but if ANYTHING goes wrong, there will be a nasty splatter and a huge public relations disaster. If the human race is ever to really get into space for real, risks must be taken, and people WILL die, just as in the beginnings of aviation. But chucking rich tourists into space and listening to them slowly expire when the engine fails and they cannot make earth orbit again will NOT help the cause.

I have, over the years, become rather frustrated with NASA, but there is something to be said for a careful, systematic approach. I really hope this does not go bad, as SpaceX and their ambitions and drive is a bright light in a world sometimes filled with darkness and misery.

Michael
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 1, 2017 - 08:25am PT
This is going to be quite a simple mission profile. There will be no engine burns required after the launch. The Falcon Heavy will fire the capsule beyond the Moon, but not fast enough to escape Earth gravity, so it will come back down and re enter the atmosphere as it was designed to do. So...would I go? Yep. This is about as simple as a space launch can get. Meanwhile the 2 astronauts will have the ride of their lifetimes.
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Mar 1, 2017 - 09:18am PT
There will be no engine burns required after the launch.

They'll need course correction burn(s) to hit the re-entry window, no?
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Mar 1, 2017 - 09:31am PT
They'll need course correction burn(s) to hit the re-entry window, no?


Oh no.... no problems anticipated at all, everybody's been paid--the union too- now-- just climb up on that big ass roman candle, do a countdown and take off. It's all so simple.

good luck to the rich ass suckers, have a blast.

Everest was fun also.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Mar 1, 2017 - 09:59am PT
Funny. I misread the thread title every time.

SpaceX to send privately screwed spacecraft beyond moon.

But seriously, I hope for a safe ride and return for those on board.

A question for the rocket scientists here: Is it really a good idea to strap three rockets together, with a total of 27 liquid fueled engines? To the lay person this looks like a large risk for failure. What happens if one of the twenty seven craps out?
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 1, 2017 - 10:04am PT
Well, a Veyron has 16 cylinders strapped together.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Mar 1, 2017 - 10:25am PT
I wonder what would happen if one of sixteen threw a rod at 250MPH?
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 1, 2017 - 10:27am PT
Engine redundancy is part of the safety planning; a single engine failure occurred once before and the spacecraft still was able to achieve orbit through extended burn time. There's a climb at JTree called Safety in Numbers, I seem to recall?
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 1, 2017 - 10:28am PT
You would wind up in a low earth orbit, at the least!
wbw

Trad climber
'cross the great divide
Mar 1, 2017 - 10:33am PT
We all just paid for a couple rich f*#ks to fly around the moon while Elon Musk makes a nice tidy profit. This country is f*#ked in the head. I seriously hope that capsule suffers a depressurization in the deep cold darkness of space.

This kind of whining completely misses the significance of what SpaceX is trying to do. If we waited for NASA to push the boundary of space exploration to the next level, we're talking about a time scale of decades. Elon Musk has the vision of putting people on Mars in a matter of a few years. Whether or not this is a good idea is one question, but I don't understand all the hating going on towards SpaceX.

Personally, I am a big fan of Elon Musk. He sets goals that members of the status quo call unrealistic, pursues them with (mostly) his own money, and achieves the "unrealistic" goals a surprising amount of the time. Yes, he takes huge risks, but that is what is required to push the envelope for any serious pursuit.

I couldn't afford to take this ride, and I'm not sure it would be within my tolerance for risk anyway. What SpaceX has done and is doing is truly amazing, and the fact is Elon Musk is pushing boundaries like this in a wide range of industries.
Gunkie

Trad climber
Valles Marineris
Mar 1, 2017 - 12:52pm PT
Tami says...
Yuuuck. Rich people doing rich people things.

F u c k o f f


Do you hate all rich people or just certain rich people?
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Mar 1, 2017 - 01:00pm PT
The scary thing is ~50 million isn't a crazy amount money to a LOT of people on Earth.

There's a couple thousand billionaires now I believe.

The gap widens... and widens... and....




rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Mar 1, 2017 - 01:05pm PT
Maybe he can solve his companies debt problem by crewing the first round the moon shot with the creditors.

Just a thought.

Actually I can get past my disdain for his sucking off the public teat by huge respect for the frontiers he's pushing.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 1, 2017 - 02:01pm PT
I have say that *We* didn't pay for it as taxpayers underwriting the mission. The only $$$ SpaceX received from the *Public Teat* was through a contract granted to them for services ALREADY RENDERED! The ISS Resupply missions is what they are getting from NASA.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Mar 1, 2017 - 02:09pm PT
a single engine failure occurred once before and the spacecraft still was able to achieve orbit through extended burn time.

I certainly hope that should one fail you are right. Again, a layman here, but doesn't the precision required to achieve that perfect lunar orbit which will then send them exactly to their re-entry window a bit trickier than achieving earth orbit?

Would they be able to compensate for a failure of one of the outside rocket engines, far out left or right?

I'm playing devil's advocate. Hopefully everything will go according to plan.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Mar 1, 2017 - 02:19pm PT
I was referring to his Tesla and First Solar companies Brokedown, not SpaceX.

If Nasa could send 8 missions, including the crippled 13 with the prehistoric equipment and computers of the 60's, I'm sure Musk can easily do it with today's technology. The Falcon Heavy's lack of adequate testing is a little worrisome though. Wouldn't want to be the first mission.



Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 1, 2017 - 04:08pm PT
The Falcon Heavy is designed with lots of overkill, and they could conceivably lose up to 3 engines and still carry out the mission. They are mounted on gimbals so the thrust can be vectored to compensate for an engine out problem. There will be no attempt to go into lunar orbit on the flight. Just a simple ballistic return The actual flight path I've seen in the diagrams is sorta' a big figure 8 because ot the distance to moon moves in it's orbit during flight time.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Mar 1, 2017 - 04:51pm PT
Just a simple ballistic return The actual flight path I've seen in the diagrams is sorta' a big figure 8 because ot the distance to moon moves in it's orbit during flight time.

Sorry, that's what I meant, a slingshot around the moon. So on the return their target is rotating and moving through space. How big is their re-entry window? Again as a layman this sounds pretty hairball.

NASA did it several times with much cruder equipment, so I suppose it's a reasonable assumption. But they also practiced the whole launch thing with heavy rockets a lot more. Saturn V never had a failure unless you count that horrible fire in the spacecraft while they were on the pad as a failure... not really the rocket's fault.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 1, 2017 - 06:24pm PT
This stuff fascinates me because I started out in college in Aerospace Engineering, but later switched to Chemistry. Yeah, I can still do some of the analytical mechanics involved It's really a 3 body problem that needs computer solution--not pencil and paper. This wouldn't be that trivial with the computational equipment from Apollo days.

Ol' Elon is getting me inspired--maybe my next car will be a Tesla?
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 1, 2017 - 07:05pm PT
Hahaha! A Tesla in Wyoming. Sounds like the start of a B grade horror movie!
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 1, 2017 - 07:33pm PT
Reilly- For me to even think about it is a grade C horror thought!
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Mar 1, 2017 - 08:31pm PT
I have an old buddy who used to work for NASA on smaller orbital vehicles. Satellite launches and the like. He's really fast with a slide rule.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2017 - 10:57am PT
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

He's really fast with a...what? I haven't seen a slide rule in years!
Mighty Hiker

climber
Outside the Asylum
Mar 5, 2017 - 10:08pm PT
Just for Rodger, jogill, Rich, jstan, and others:
My father in front of a display of slide rules he made for his engineering classes' 50th anniversary reunion. One slide rule for each student - he collected them at rummage, garage, and other sales. It's now hanging at the University of Saskatchewan.

But I wouldn't let him have my trusty Napier's Bones.

Werner: I still have a round slide rule.
WBraun

climber
Mar 5, 2017 - 10:19pm PT
When I was in college I had the round one up on that board ......

I still have my lab notes from those days.

If I still have my round one I'll post its photo here.
Brokedownclimber

Trad climber
Douglas, WY
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 6, 2017 - 06:14pm PT
I actually learned to use on when I was still in grade school.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 6, 2017 - 06:45pm PT
You guys - mine would start smokin' when I was doin' trig with it.
Messages 1 - 72 of total 72 in this topic
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta