crumbling Freedom of the Press too divisive to discuss?

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 263 of total 263 in this topic
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Original Post - Feb 24, 2017 - 12:26pm PT
I wrote the title somewhat in sarcastic jest, but it is transforming to dread as I realize it is probably true. Some (many?) people are so short-sighted in supporting a partisan agenda that they don't realize how much suffering and blood of the past they are disrespecting, the hard-fought battle to create a nation where people of different creeds and aspirations and values can live in relative harmony and pursue whatever makes them happy.

Some might argue that every press outlet has a hidden agenda, a political bias, and that there is nothing sacred being violated here, just more political machinations. But think about what it means for the vibrancy of our democracy when organizations representing a variety of viewpoints do not have access to reporting the happenings of our elected government?

Many folks were quick to insult Bernie by calling him a Socialist or a Commie, and many here still do, with the intent of tying him to the negative associations of cold-war era Soviet Union. One of the hallmark features of that government that we feared was control of the media, making it a marketing machine for the distorted vision of those controlling the government. It even has an appropriate name, Правда (Pravda: "Truth").

I'm getting a headache from the irony whacking me over the head repeatedly.


We know where Trump is steering people:
The FAKE NEWS media (failing @nytimes, @NBCNews, @ABC, @CBS, @CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American People!


And now we have this:
CNN and other news organizations were blocked Friday from an off-camera White House press briefing.
There was no immediate explanation from the White House.
The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and Politico were also excluded from the meeting, which is known as a gaggle and is less formal than the televised Q-and-A session in the White House briefing room.
The Associated Press and Time magazine boycotted the briefing because of how it was handled. The White House Correspondents Association is protesting.
The conservative media organizations Breitbart News, The Washington Times and One America News Network were allowed in.
Related: Trump rips media, repeats 'enemy of the people' line
Hours earlier, at the Conservative Political Action Conference outside Washington, President Trump mocked and disparaged the news media. He said that much of the press represents "the enemy of the people."
"They are the enemy of the people because they have no sources," Trump said. "They just make them up when there are none."
He also said reporters "shouldn't be allowed" to use unnamed sources.

"A few days ago I called the fake news the enemy of the people, and they are — they are the enemy of the people," Trump told the annual Conservative Political Action Conference.

While praising some reporters as honest, and pledging fealty to the First Amendment, Trump claimed that "the fake news media doesn't tell the truth." He said reporters should not be allowed to use anonymous sources, and "we're going to do something about it."
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/24/donald-trump-cpac-media-enemy-of-the-people/98347970/

Because how can the sources be accused of being pedophiles or rapists before they have an unrelated car accident or heart attack, if we don't know who they are? This is amidst an internal crackdown in FBI to find who leaked the stuff about Flynn that led to him needing to be fired.


I don't disrespect people for having a different political opinion from me, for valuing different things or seeing different ways to solve problems. I might vehemently disagree with what people perceive as root problems and how to address them, and I might harbor judgments about people's powers of perceptions or intellect. But I still try to keep a bridge open to foster a common understanding where we can, and I'm always ready to have someone show me a perspective I didn't consider or appreciate.

But how does any person reconcile these threats to our democracy and access to information, with the benefits they hope to achieve? How die-hard do you have to be in a partisan agenda for these ends to justify the means? When does it become too much?

I do hope that folks like Dr F can stay on point and not just turn it into a grudge match "All Republicans are evil, they hate everything, they want to extract all of your dollars and productivity and crush your soul before crushing your life, so you have to vote Democrat or you are helping to kil our civilization." Whether or not something like that is true, having that type of conversation is a shortcut to alienating a large part of the people who have to be part of the solution, and it's a shortcut to having the thread locked, deleted, and fewer people will be aware of what is happening. We've been there before, let's not repeat the pattern please.

Let's be cordial and write something that has a chance of lasting; don't be baited by the nihilists who want the discussion to descend to chaos and laugh as our voice is silenced in a deleted thread.
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 24, 2017 - 12:40pm PT
Let the dictatorship begin.


http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/24/media/cnn-blocked-white-house-gaggle/index.html

*John McCain recently came to the defense of the free press.

*The retired Navy SEAL, 4 star Admiral, that commanded the raid that killed Bin Laden, just said that Trump's attacks on the free press are more dangerous than radical Islam.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2017 - 12:44pm PT
Russ, grow a pair and actually share what is in your heart.

TGT2, what do you see as the antidote? From my perspective, having access to a variety of perspectives is a critical foundation of any reason-based process. We all have access to see who owns different outlets and what bent or bias they might have as part of informing our opinion.
Eric Beck

Sport climber
Bishop, California
Feb 24, 2017 - 12:48pm PT
Trump is right to hate the media. The establishment hates Trump and are disparaging him at every opportunity. CNN is the worst.

I am not a Trump supporter and find it somewhat odd to be uttering a word in his defense. The big picture is that the last election was the first time that large numbers in both parties rebelled against 1% rule. One percent rule is the way it has been forever. Remember the divine right of kings?

I didn't vote for Trump and told my friends that a vote for Hillary was a vote for endless war.
monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 24, 2017 - 12:48pm PT
No TGT, it's more like somethings do change.

Did Thomas Jefferson bar the press he didn't like from the White House?
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 24, 2017 - 12:48pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 24, 2017 - 12:49pm PT
The art of leadership... consists in consolidating the attention of the people against a single adversary and taking care that nothing will split up that attention. Adolf Hitler


The media does not, and will never speak for the American people. And we're going to do something about it.
Donald Trump

The media is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American people.
Donald Trump


If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed. Adolf Hitler
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2017 - 12:52pm PT
I suspect any elected politician will grow to hate nearly half the media if not more. But that is different from actively blocking.

I'm all for laws that seek to enforce truth. But it is a really difficult area. I have been in a court of law with an opposing party uttering lies that I have verifiable proof to refute, and my own lawyer told me it doesn't matter, the judge assumes we are both lying.

As best I can see in our modern society, the notion of truth is not like a discrete particle, but more like a probabilistic cloud. How can you wrap your fingers around a cloud? The best we can do is ensure that cloud is comprised of more sources and increase the transparency for each of us to vet the quality of sources we consume.
Russ Walling

Social climber
from Poofters Froth, Wyoming
Feb 24, 2017 - 12:53pm PT
Russ, grow a pair and actually share what is in your heart.


So basically when you say “grow a pair” you’re telling that person to “be a man”. You’re reinforcing the stereotype that men are stronger and more courageous than women.

Why are lefties sooo sexist and why do they hate America?
jogill

climber
Colorado
Feb 24, 2017 - 12:57pm PT
The antagonism - and it goes both ways - is a sign of a healthy democracy.



This thread has a half-life of . . .
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 24, 2017 - 12:58pm PT
Russ, do you support the suppression of the free press?
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2017 - 12:59pm PT
I guess I made it too easy to fight the wrong fight. I was wrong and surrender that point Russ. Whether it's testes or ovaries, it is still disrespectful of me. I am frustrated when you take an important issue that affects us all, and laugh it off or play the peanut gallery as if it doesn't affect your life, or the life of people you care about, or the lives of people they care about.
drF

Trad climber
usa
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:04pm PT
Nut,

Another garbage politard thread...why? Take it to a politard forum where you will have an audience that has the intellectual/educational prowess to have real conversations. Or...goto a place where you can actually talk to people in person on these subjects that seem to be troubling you.

All you're going to get here are brainwashed clowns who repost BS MSM smears with zero factual basis. Clowns who actually compare Trump with Hitler. Single digit on the I.Q scale

Delete this trash....please

Cragar

climber
MSLA - MT
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:05pm PT
If it is too divisive that we can't discuss/find common ground to ensure something like 'free press' is not abolished as it benefits ALL of us, then we must be as thin skinned as the folks in charge that drive this kind of agenda.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2017 - 01:11pm PT
This discussion has a point other than partisan politics. This is about what we consider sacred in our country that should not be subject to partisan destruction.

Are we really ok with only having information from government-sanctioned media outlets? This isn't something to be pigeon-holed in a political-junky forum.

I always teach my kids about linking rights and freedoms with responsibilities. As citizens of a "free" country we have responsibilities to help ensure it remains that way. Ensuring that the populace is aware of information that affects their lives is a foundation of any voting democracy that hopes to support the interests of the people. You can't act on what you don't know.


Many people here may be disgusted/fatigued/etc. with news and just ignore it now. Even if you need to tune out for sanity, I want to increase awareness here, to remind folks of what I consider our responsibilities as citizens (of USA or whatever country).
c wilmot

climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:16pm PT
You are basing your opinions on the belief that the media is somehow impartial or non partisan. The media has been lying and misleading people forever.
Mungeclimber

Trad climber
Nothing creative to say
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:19pm PT
This type of rhetoric is dangerous. There is no doubt about that.

Whether the media outlets affected can rally the media outlets on the inside of the nouveau propaganda machine to protest remains to be seen.

This is new ground. Write letters to the media editors so that they know you are watching for their own leadership on freedom of the press issues.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2017 - 01:21pm PT
c_wilmot, if you read my earlier posts you will see that I do not believe the media is impartial. I want the freedom to consume information from any source and to use my own powers of research and discernment to decide the quality of that information. I don't want the Whitehouse forming cozy alliances and blocking non-drinkers of the Koolaid.

We are getting much too close for my comfort to this:
“The past was alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.”
drF

Trad climber
usa
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:21pm PT
You can't act on what you don't know.

But you can act on lies?

The hatred for the media is non-partisan and BY the people. Not what Trump or any other politician says. The MSM is in the business of making money...not truth. If you want truth, you have to work harder...dig. Goto the source. Be prepared to find things that go against your confirmation biases
c wilmot

climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:23pm PT
Trump is not the first pres to influence the media...
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2017 - 01:24pm PT
Some things I (and many if not most of us) learned by kindergarten would be good lessons for us all. One example:

two wrongs don't make a right




Edit: Perhaps the thing that bothers me the most is how many people can remain complacent in the face of stuff like this. It makes me feel that I am a sane person in a sea of insanity, and thus I become the only insane one. (c_wilmot, this answers your question below I think).
c wilmot

climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:25pm PT
What suddenly upset you?
Are you worried your beliefs might be challenged?
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:28pm PT
Despite President Donald Trump’s relentless attacks on the “fake news” media, a new poll from Quinnipiac University finds that more Americans trust the media than Donald Trump.

A majority of Americans, 52%, said they trust the news media over Donald Trump to tell the truth about important issues. Only 37% said they trusted Trump more.

"The media, so demonized by the Trump Administration, is actually a good deal more popular than President Trump," said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.

Unsurprisingly, responses divided sharply on party lines. Democrats and Independents trust the media more than Trump. Eighty-six percent of Democrats trust the news media more than the president. Among Independents, 50% trust the media more, while 38% trust Trump.

Happiegrrrl2

Trad climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:42pm PT
While I do understand not wanting thread after thread on the "Trump Issue," I also get why people discuss it here. I have no real desire to go searching for "political discussion forums" to post to. I know or have met a good number of the people here, and to be honest I look to those on both side FOR input into the various subjects as they come up. I don't like it when people insist on the low-level attacks, but not everyone has the ability to debate intelligently.

Nonetheless, I have gone over to Twitter for information now, and have found several good resources. But I can't really communicate in 140 characters and less, and the nested responses that some are very good at seem a big PITA to me. I mostly just Favorite comments in like and crack one-liners to @RealDonaldTrump tweets.

John Schindler has been a very interesting Follow, not only for his own insight but the high quality RTs in his feed. He's at https://twitter.com/20committee


He also posted a link to this Daily Beast Article the other day, which does a good jib at painting a very frightening picture of Felix Satter. According to Schindler, is likely to be the pin that gets pulled on the grenade that blows up the Donald. My reading on it is that Trump has been, perhaps unwittingly, relying on a man who was(is) an unwilling tool of CIA/FBI. Oops.....

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/02/24/meet-felix-sater-the-russian-bad-hombre-who-works-with-trump.html?via=desktop&source=twitter
ecdh

climber
the east
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:43pm PT
Im with ya, and think you are correct to be concerned.

That said i dont think the media has changed much, its the social media connection that just makes everyone part of the bullshit now. No ones an idle media consumer now.

To my mind tho the most nebulous and dubious element isnt the hidden stuff, its the trivialization of whats shown. As much as i enjoy locker and wallings jibes, its the problem not the solution.

The corruption of whats right before our eyes is the hardest to see. Thats the trick of totalitarianism - make everyone fret over what may be hidden but slip the nasty sh#t thru in plain sight.

The remedy? Call on it when you see it. Think Pussy Riot.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:44pm PT
The level and scale of this deliberate assault on the fourth estate - combined with the incessant daily lies and distortions should be grounds for impeachment.
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:51pm PT
Trump is right to hate the media. The establishment hates Trump and are disparaging him at every opportunity...

If you honestly believe that parity exists between the accuracy of reporting from NYT, CNN, as opposed to Breitbart & Infowars, Trump and Bannon's work is complete.

Curt
jonnyrig

climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 01:53pm PT
The people who most need to be exposed to the truth are the ones who are least likely to believe it, even when confronted with irrefutable evidence.

They say that silence amounts to tacit approval. That may or may not be true; but at this point I'm just kicking back waiting for the world to burn. Maybe it will, maybe it won't.

Either way, my personal belief is that people on both ends of the political spectrum are too busy trying to find blurbs that reinforce their own confirmational biases to even care what the truth is or what the rest of the world has to say about.

Suppression of the media? Probably not a good thing. Stinks of a cover--up.

Silence = tacit approval? Not really, more like f*#k it, let it burn. Then rise from the ashes.
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 24, 2017 - 02:00pm PT
CNN, NY Times, LA Times, Politico, barred.

AP and Time bowed out in protest.
Batrock

Trad climber
Burbank
Feb 24, 2017 - 02:01pm PT
What time are we leaving Monday for the Saline? Since you haven't returned my Meassage I figure I'd try you here ;)
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 24, 2017 - 02:07pm PT
pravda is still in for sure
Flip Flop

climber
Earth Planet, Universe
Feb 24, 2017 - 02:11pm PT
We live in a time and place where we expect the media and marketing to lie to us. So much of news is just political propaganda and marketing. Why can't the president call it like he see's it?
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2017 - 02:26pm PT
Sorry Batrock, found my phone and replied ;)

Flip-flop, I didn't cry crumbling democracy for Trump's Twitter comments. It is up to individuals to judge him based on his own words. He can say what he wants, though he is the main ambassador of our nation to the world, and I would be less embarrassed if he exercised more maturity. But when he uses the power and authority of his office to curtail the power of the press (friend or foe) to shine a light on his activities while in office, I draw the line there.

I'm not trying to turn Trump supporters into non-supporters because I don't think that is possible. Just please hold him accountable to the same standards that you would hold any other candidate or office-holder.

This is about institutions that should be bigger and more sacred than any individual occupying a position.

drF

Trad climber
usa
Feb 24, 2017 - 02:28pm PT
CNN, NY Times, LA Times, Politico, barred.

AP and Time bowed out in protest.

This has already been discussed. Try to keep up? Or...just keep posting the same nonsense over and over.
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 24, 2017 - 02:33pm PT
I'll post what I like, RUSS, but thanks. You certainly brought zero to the table.


Edit: Yes, the tweeter in chief can call it as he likes. But banning major news outlets and only allowing the flattering ones is called State Run Media. I thought y'all were against State Run Enterprises?
Wayno

Big Wall climber
Seattle, WA
Feb 24, 2017 - 02:46pm PT
Nut, you mentioned Pravda, which means truth. They also have Izvestia, which means news. They also have an expression that says the News is not Truth, and the Truth is not News. Been that way for a while.
Russ Walling

Social climber
from Poofters Froth, Wyoming
Feb 24, 2017 - 02:47pm PT
Survivor bleats:
I'll post what I like, RUSS, but thanks. You certainly brought zero to the table.

The fake DrF is not me you dimwit.
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 24, 2017 - 02:49pm PT
Right. Whatever seamstress.
Russ Walling

Social climber
from Poofters Froth, Wyoming
Feb 24, 2017 - 02:50pm PT
Nutagain:
I want to increase awareness here, to remind folks of what I consider our responsibilities as citizens

Thank you comrade for letting me know what you think is my responsibility.
Studly

Trad climber
WA
Feb 24, 2017 - 02:53pm PT
Russ, they don't call people comrade anymore in Russia, that ended with the fall of the Soviet Union. Man you are so stuck in the 80's..grow a pear..
DrBen

Trad climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 02:54pm PT

I think Eric Beck said it close to right. CNN has edited video to fit their fake belief. Not sure about the point that Bill Clinton was a 1 percenter. He didn't go in as one, but is now of course.


"Trump is right to hate the media. The establishment hates Trump and are disparaging him at every opportunity. CNN is the worst. I am not a Trump supporter and find it somewhat odd to be uttering a word in his defense. The big picture is that the last election was the first time that large numbers in both parties rebelled against 1% rule. One percent rule is the way it has been forever. Remember the divine right of kings?

I didn't vote for Trump and told my friends that a vote for Hillary was a vote for endless war. "
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Feb 24, 2017 - 03:16pm PT
The USSR a quarter century gone. Boris, then Vlad fancied themselves more Czar than general secretary, consequently the commie rats abandoned ship and settled upon these shores. Most of the nutcase loons starting these political threads don't quite understand they are useful idiots. Others like Craig and Crankcase are a lot more hard core organizer than climber. CMAC should ban all anti American activities because they're not conducive to his capitalist path.
Fat Dad

Trad climber
Los Angeles, CA
Feb 24, 2017 - 03:23pm PT
Nut,

You're right. This issue is incredibly important. One of the most concerning things about Trump's election (apart from demonstrating the abject stupidity of those who voted for him) is that many of his supporters have been lulled into complacency because their guy "won". You cannot have been thinking that critically to have supported Trump, so it's not surprising that the same people fail to think critically about the importance of a free press to a democracy.
Trump is right to hate the media. The establishment hates Trump and are disparaging him at every opportunity. CNN is the worst.

I am not a Trump supporter and find it somewhat odd to be uttering a word in his defense. The big picture is that the last election was the first time that large numbers in both parties rebelled against 1% rule. One percent rule is the way it has been forever. Remember the divine right of kings?

I didn't vote for Trump and told my friends that a vote for Hillary was a vote for endless war.
This post strikes me as incredibly naive. Trump is right to hate the media, but they call it like it is (which I'm sure he doesn't like), not because they're making up stuff about him. It's probably closer to 'which of the many horrible gaffes do we cover next?'

Also, a vote for Trump was not a vote against the 1%. Again, incredibly naive. Try as he did to portray himself as a friend to the working man, this is a guy who has gotten to where he is by stepping on people, pure and simple. His only care is his own advancement.
Happiegrrrl2

Trad climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 03:28pm PT
Following the various leads from @20comittee, these people(seems quite a lot of them worked in/around/under NatSec) see to have taken it upon themselves to do investigative reporting, and are coming up with some very interesting reading and insightful commentary. They are not hacks, so far as I can tell, and it is pretty interesting.

One of said "Twittter Connections" posts quite a bit of info and suggests that the Trump casino losses were very probably laundromats for Russian dirty money. More than I can digest, but others may find as interesting as I am.
https://twitter.com/Khanoisseur/status/817982670277746688
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 03:36pm PT
If you honestly believe that parity exists between the accuracy of reporting from NYT, CNN, as opposed to Breitbart & Infowars, Trump and Bannon's work is complete.

Spot on! There is NO parity!

Neither Breitbart nor Infowars ever directly influenced an election by directly influencing the perceived outcome of a primary debate by handing only ONE participating candidate the questions in advance.

CNN was rightly called "Clinton News Network." Glad that's fixed now, as there's no Clinton to write much about anymore.

Regarding this mythical "assault on the fourth estate," I'm waiting to see any evidence of any actual assault. The first amendment defends the right of free speech and expression of opinion, even, gasp, on the part of the President.

What libs don't grasp (AT ALL!) is that words and ideas are NOT assaults. So, you don't get to justify violence effectively yelling "fire" in a crowded theater just because somebody, even, gasp, the President, expresses an opinion that you don't like.

Opinions are not dangerous.

Words are not dangerous.

Ideas are not dangerous.

What people DO on the basis of their beliefs can be dangerous. But in this nation we DO NOT engage in thought-pre-crime by calling ideas dangerous in themselves thereby to justify stopping people from thinking and expressing thoughts that are "offensive" (to even the majority).

If you think that ideas themselves are dangerous, then you are motivated (and the left clearly is so motivated) to send us into 1984-land, where thought-crimes are the FIRST things to be attacked by the violence of the State. We're nearly there already, thanks to the left's relentless determination to establish the notion of thought-crimes.

You want to know something truly dangerous? How about FORCING people to SAY what you insist that they say? You know, like FORCING people to refer to others by "preferred pronouns" and other such absurd tripe. And all of this in flagrant disregard for basic biology!

FORCE is in fact dangerous. Yet libs don't get up in arms about that, as long as the force is being employed to FORCE their ideas to become law. You know, LAWS are dangerous too, because laws imply force.

So, when we see Trump proposing LAWS to FORCE the press to SAY particular things, or laws disallowing the press to say particular things, then we'll have something to talk about. Until then, all you've got to moan about is Trump's expressions of dislike. Tough! Trump gets to engage in such expressions, even if they offend you.

That's how freedom works: People get to say things that offend you, and you don't get to pass laws to call such expressions "dangerous," "wrong," or illegal.
drF

Trad climber
usa
Feb 24, 2017 - 03:39pm PT
They are not hacks, so far as I can tell

Learned from extensive times spent in Walmart parking lots. You've been multi-tooled.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 03:43pm PT
One of said "Twittter Connections" posts quite a bit of info and suggests that the Trump casino losses were very probably laundromats for Russian dirty money. More than I can digest, but others may find as interesting as I am.

You libs are literally hilarious!

Everywhere you look, in the UTTER absence of the same "burden of PROOF" you demanded regarding the endless Clinton scandals, you find "evidence" of Trump's "wrongdoing," because you see smoking guns everywhere you look.

However, let Clinton exhibit gross negligence in her handling of classified materials and her OBVIOUS intention to violate every records-keeping law the federal government has, and you not only turn a blind eye but claim that anybody having a problem with this should "provide PROOF or shut up."

Alright, back atcha. Provide PROOF or shut up.

Show me the CRIME Trump's been convicted of, or shut up.

You don't get to have it both ways. Use a consistent standard of evidence-evaluation. And Twitter is not a "source." I know, sorry to burst your bubble.

You libs are doing EVERYTHING you warned in advance that non-libs had better not do WHEN Clinton was (for sure) elected.

Mellow out. The sky's not falling. Unless YOU foment a civil war, this nation's gonna go on like before.
drF

Trad climber
usa
Feb 24, 2017 - 03:47pm PT
The fake DrF is not me you dimwit.

Russ is correct. I'm not he. But you are indeed a dimwit.
Fat Dad

Trad climber
Los Angeles, CA
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:03pm PT
Great, madbolter is back. I look forward to many insightful, substantiated claims from him.

Like I said, the guillibility that prompted people to vote (and continue to defend) him is the same cluelessness that makes this look like a non-issue. Step on the 1st Amendment, no problem. Reasonable restrictions on firearms, hell no.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2017 - 04:03pm PT
Madbolter, there are more nuanced ways of subverting the power of the press to report on facts. By blocking their access to facts, this administration is actively seeking to destroy the news agencies that have published unflattering information, agencies that have a tradition of exposing corruption in our government, and that have been instrumental in exposing corruption in the present administration. Note that of the major agencies that were allowed, one is owned by the President's son in law (edit: I screwed up on this point, Washington Post not owned by Kuchner- that is New York Observer), and another is the Chairman of the Board for the agency while also being the White House Chief Strategist. If I was writing a fictional movie, I couldn't make it more nefarious. If someone from the past was transported into this scenario, they would naively assume that making this information public would be the end of the administration, and their head would explode at how people don't seem to give a sh!t.


Not allowing a set of disfavored news agencies access to information about policies emanating from the White House, while showing favor to others with direct and intimate ties to the administration, is criminal in spirit if not in current letter of the law for several reasons. It should be explicitly illegal for these reasons:

1. It sends a clear message to all news agencies that if they want the information upon which their livelihood depends, they have to play ball in a way that the White House likes.

2. It provides an incentive for real news agencies to not publish real information they receive from other sources, for fear of being cast out from the approved list of White House press briefings.

3. It sanctions and grants more credibility to news agencies which formerly were recognized as fringe crazy folks but are now being elevated to a level beyond real news agencies.

I will say that I would prefer more fact-based reporting and fewer sensational headlines... that all comes from owners of news outlets seeing it as a profit and influence peddling machine more than a higher calling to preserve a democracy. But it is not the job of the White House to fix this problem, and what they are doing can't credibly be called "fixing" the problem. We could perhaps make a rule that no newspaper is allowed to have a majority stake owned by another corporation or individual. It would help, but it would be subverted by behind-the-scenes collusion. And it might wreak havoc on the blogosphere of no-name individual reporters with no real business structure.

In short, the problem of fixing media industry issues is separate from condemning our government for denying access to mainstream media outlets. And it is separate from a government administration favoring news outlets that are intimately related to them.

For any of the apologists or people who accept this, or say "oh it's always been that way", I would like to know where you personally draw the line and say "now I find it unacceptable." Do they need to have a firing squad for journalists before you take it seriously? Or just a law where the Executive Branch can shut down any media outlet for matters of "national security"? I'm trying to home in on the point at which it becomes unacceptable.


Edit: I would like to delete a major mistake I made above, but I'll just point it out here. Washington post is not Jared Kuchner's... I was confusing that with New York Observer and not fact-checking myself while I wrote. Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos. One might consider a conflict of interest in terms of Bezos' need to have his space-related business interests be supported by the government, rather than blocked for "national security" concerns. But in any case, I was wrong to call out Jared Kuchner on this one.
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:06pm PT
Russ is correct. I'm not he. But you are indeed a dimwit.


All of the stitcher in chief's personalities are coming out today.

Here you go:
*You seem to hate drF, and so do you.
*One of your posts was about JTree tipping.
*One of your posts was knowledgeable about El Cap.
*One of your posts was slapping Patrick Sawyer some more.
*One of your posts was bumping your own chat room thread.

It sucks to get busted at your own trolling I guess. That dude is not me is the same thing you said last time I busted you.

Regardless of who you are, you're a n00b on this site.

If you're not RUSS then you better unspoon from his ass, cuz you sure post like him. Get your own personality if you're not RUSS.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:07pm PT
Eric Beck... it saddened me to read your post.


...

"I am frustrated when you take an important issue that affects us all, and laugh it off or play the peanut gallery as if it doesn't affect your life, or the life of people you care about, or the lives of people they care about." -NA

NutAgain, you continue to impress me as occupying a level above this place. Don't be too disheartened by what you see or read here, it's only a climbing forum.
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:08pm PT
Neither Breitbart nor Infowars ever directly influenced an election...

Neither of them has ever published anything factually accurate either.

Curt
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:13pm PT
Not allowing a set of disfavored news agencies access to information about policies emanating from the White House, while showing favor to others with direct and intimate ties to the administration, is criminal in spirit if not in current letter of the law for several reasons.

Too much to say in response to your post. So, I'll settle for responding to one thing.

You libs have ZERO credibility to talk about "criminal in spirit" in the face of your machinations to avoid having to agree that Clinton was "criminal in spirit."

Now that Trump's in office, you see "danger" everywhere you look and want to see brand new laws to "ensure" that the "danger" is abated. But you voted for and sincerely wanted a Clinton in the WH, and she did many things (including her own OBVIOUS "in" with the Russians) that you turned a blind eye to and actively berated others for calling attention to.

There is NO doubt that the mainstream media are far-gone, FAR worse than merely "biased." If Trump doesn't want his words (or even what he doesn't say) to be actively and intentionally misinterpreted by the media, more power to him.

Nothing he's said so far can hold a candle to "What? Like with a cloth?"

The 1st amendment cuts all ways. Trump has the right to speak or not speak as he pleases.

The sky is not falling.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:17pm PT
Neither of them has ever published anything factually accurate either.

I guess that depends on what you mean by "accurate." By your standards, neither has the mainstream media in a long time.

ALL news now-a-days is "editorial." I can't think of the last time I read an article and thought, "Wow... just the facts as can be verified via other sources. Amazing!"

Even the "facts" are spun and pre-digested. What ISN'T known or said is interpreted for the LACK thereof. In short, the media takes a few "facts" and MAKES them into whatever it wants.
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:17pm PT
You libs have ZERO credibility...

And yet, still tons more credibility than you. Funny isn't it?

Curt
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:22pm PT
And yet, still tons more credibility than you. Funny isn't it?

Only in your own mind. Funny how that works, isn't it?

See? The game you're playing is EASY. You think that drive-by quips and "cleverness" (falsely so called) equates to argument and discussion. These threads are all the same: When confronted with their own inconsistencies, libs always devolve into Kindergarten behaviors, including name-calling and lame jibes.

You DIDN'T care when Clinton was selling off our uranium to the Russians (while getting rich in the process). You didn't care when she was violating every records-keeping law we have a law for. You didn't care... well, what's the point? You DIDN'T care!

Now that she didn't win (as she surely MUST have), you accept a LOWER bar of "evidence" to "convict" Trump in popular opinion. It's like Christ said: "You strain at a gnat and swallow a camel."

I find it laughable now.

The sky is not falling.
Happiegrrrl2

Trad climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:31pm PT
Use a consistent standard of evidence-evaluation. And Twitter is not a "source."

Twitter can act as an aggregator of information. Some people like to collect funny cat videos, and others provide their own opinion pieces, resource analysis, data sets, and links to news reporting/excerpts from books written by professional academics and experts in particular fields. @20Committee seems to to do a pretty good job with the latter.

If this is your idea of someone you consider a hack, I'd like to suggest you are incorrect in your a*#ertion.

John R. Schindler is a strategist, author, and commentator whose security-focused career has included a couple decades as both a scholar and practitioner. He is the national security columnist for the New York Observer.

Previously a professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College, where he taught courses on security, strategy, intelligence, terrorism, and military history, before joining the NWC faculty, he spent nearly a decade with the super-secret National Security Agency as an intelligence analyst and counterintelligence officer. There’s not much he can say about that, except that he worked problems in Eastern Europe and the Middle East with a counterespionage flavor, and he collaborated closely with other government agencies who would probably prefer he didn’t mention them. He’s also served as an officer specializing in cryptology (now called information warfare for no particular reason) in the U.S. Navy Reserve.

https://20committee.com/about/

The people he tends to RT are at a similar level. "they" seem to think that the Russia/TrumpCo connection is fairly intriguing, and don't appear to be types that would be spending their time and reputation on conspiracy theories.

They also are not necessarily Democrats. Does t come as a surprise to you that there are also Republicans, Independents and NoneOfYourBusinessers who are appalled at the current situation?

the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:31pm PT
As I said a few months before the election there is no sense trying to reason with Trump supporters anymore.

You'll just hear a lot of "you libs" or "you lefties" "believe this", "do this". Almost always with a huge degree of hypocrisy or straw man arguments (hence the you lefties believe this, because they can't debate the reality).

Again, I'm a moderate, all the animosity against the left doesn't really bother me, but it's telling how all they can do is attack the messenger/opposition.

Trump is a horrible joke. He is doing so many things wrong it doesn't begin to make up for the few things he is doing right.

I almost laughed out loud at the earlier statement about how this election was a rejection of the 1%. Like Trump isn't the 1% personified. But I guess the election of Trump proves how gullible so many people are.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2017 - 04:33pm PT
Folks, do you really not care about policing abuses of power that more gravely threaten us than any foreign country can?

Corruption is corruption, regardless of who is committing it. Assume for the moment that Trump is the least guilty of blocking the media of any President in history, and it is only through his administration's heavy-handed approach that we can see the nefariousness. Assume your favorite other whipping boy or girl is more guilty. Redirection to past violators is a non-defense, a non-argument here. We can't fix the fact that Europeans came and slaughtered or imprisoned a continent full of indigenous people to make our country. We can't fix Bay of Pigs, Iran/Contra Affair, Watergate, deposing democratically elected leaders of other nations, Whitewater controversy, presidential affairs, etc.... We can act on the here and now according to what we believe is acceptable or unacceptable behavior for our government.

Focus! Where do you defenders/distractors/demurrers draw the line? I would like to better understand what sort of people I share this country with.
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:37pm PT
There's no point trying to have a productive discussion with Trump supporters. This thread would be better used to discuss what reasonable people can do to slow the damage Trump will do over the next 4 years.
BASE104

Social climber
An Oil Field
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:49pm PT
OK. This is pretty interesting, so follow:

Some of you probably know who Alex Jones is. He has a sort of radio show/youtube presence.

He is the KING of fake news. He says that the moon landings were faked, 9-11 was a government conspiracy, chemtrails are a secret plan to alter our weather, flouridation of water is bad. He said that Obama was going to round up people and put them in FEMA camps. If it is weird, he has said it.

Remember the guy who shot his AR-15 in that pizza place which supposedly held Hillary Clinton pimping out kids? That was in response to an Alex Jones claim. Look it up.

Go to youtube and watch him. Look through it for some of his more outlandish claims.

Trump actually went on his show in December. According to Jones, Trump remains in contact with him.

So CNN is now Fake News. So is ABC, CBS, NBC, Reuters, AP, all of them. Yet Alex Jones is OK.

Trump is such a thin skinned narcissist. He can't take criticism. He never could. Just look back at his life. So a newsperson gets a leak from within the FBI saying that Flynn did indeed talk about sanctions when he talked with the Russian ambassador. Trump had known this for a month, but did nothing until the media caught on.

Trump has been stepping on his dick so badly that all he can do is try to criticize the messenger. His continuous claims of his massive victory (false-see wiki), the record crowds, 3 million illegal voters how made him lose the popular vote.

We have never seen such a self centered and thin skinned person in such high office. Even Jesse Ventura carried himself like a professional.

Trump just repeated his claim that the media is the enemy of the people.

You could not have made this up 6 months ago.

Just read the Wiki page on Trump's buddy Alex Jones:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Jones_(radio_host)

Fox is right wing. MSNBC is left wing. CNN and the rest are in the middle. So are the best newspapers. They take getting it right seriously. Trump keeps getting caught up in something. The media reports and he can't take it. So now he is marginalizing the media.
TradEddie

Trad climber
Philadelphia, PA
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:51pm PT
You don't get to have it both ways. Use a consistent standard of evidence-evaluation.

Right back at you! If Obama had said that all gun manufacturers, or all gun owners were the enemy of the American people and that "we're going to do something about it", you'd have blown a gasket!

Trump took action today against unfavorable press, not just his typical empty talk. If you're not very concerned about the implications of that, you should be.

TE
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:54pm PT
Does t come as a surprise to you that there are also Republicans, Independents and NoneOfYourBusinessers who are appalled at the current situation?

People being appalled or not is no standard. Being appalled blows hot and cold, and the fickle "majority" is really pretty irrelevant to the proper functioning of a republic.
BASE104

Social climber
An Oil Field
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:56pm PT
What he did today just shows what a thin skin he has. He doesn't behave professionally, and makes outrageous claims, like the one about his electoral college victory being the greatest since Reagan.

Nope: Obama beat it twice. Clinton twice. George H.W. Bush once.

In the middle of a press meeting with the prime minister of Israel, he got off tangent and started raving about his massive electoral college win. It finally took a reporter to set him straight, in that later, long meandering news conference.

He must have said it fifty times. He was that dumb.

I hope he gets his act together. I really do.
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM
Feb 24, 2017 - 04:57pm PT
TGT2...Jefferson was trying to deny the news reporting on his relationship with his female slaves. The news was right and he was wrong/lying.

Some things never change.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 05:02pm PT
Right back at you! If Obama had said that all gun manufacturers, or all gun owners were the enemy of the American people and that "we're going to do something about it", you'd have blown a gasket!

Not true.

Both Obama and Clinton talked radical gun control. In the end, Clinton made it a key part of her platform. I did not "blow a gasket". LOL

I did what you SHOULD do (since you're telling me what I SHOULD do or be): I said, "Well, that's not gonna fly," and I waited to see. I voted against her (even though that meant holding my nose to vote Trump). As expected, nothing came of it.

No gasket-blowing and no epic frothing like you libs now. Oh, and no rioting in the streets and violence against persons and property.

Trump took action today against unfavorable press, not just his typical empty talk. If you're not very concerned about the implications of that, you should be.

If you're telling me that I should be frothing at the mouth like you libs are, I'll politely decline.

The sky is not falling, and your statement about "took action" is pretty thin. Clinton took action when she set up an email server CLEARLY intended to circumvent records-keeping laws. You had nothing to say in opposition to that clearly nefarious act. You had nothing to say when she was selling our uranium to the Russians to enrich herself (ah, excuse me, her FOUNDATION, LOL). You turn a blind eye whenever it's liberal dirty-dealings and demand PROOF.

Now you've got to deal with "right wing" "dirty-dealings," and it's YOU who's blowing a gasket.

Excuse me if I don't care to follow you into that morass.

You were gonna HATE everything Trump said or did. That was a given. So, the frothing now is no surprise.

Carry on.
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Feb 24, 2017 - 05:15pm PT
Nothing Trump is doing is surprising to me at all. It's completely in line with how he behaved during the election.

I was just surprised that enough people were gullible enough to vote for him. The deplorables I understand. There's enough self centered bigots to give him a reasonable chunk of the electorate. It's the people that should know better but allowed themselves to believe all the BS of the right wing media and Trump campaign, hold their noses and vote for him.

Thankfully our systems are setup with checks and balances and separation of powers (freedom of the press is one of these checks and this is what Trump is trying to erode) and Trump is fairly incompetent so that should limit the damage he does in terms of normal everyday governance.

What worries me is if the sh#t hits the fan. e.g. an armed conflict with Iran, North Korea, Russia, etc. I'm not sure of the limits of his narcissism and sociopathy but I could see him really screwing things up if something happens where we need a real leader.
WBraun

climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 05:21pm PT
What worries me is if the sh#t hits the fan.

The sh!t has been hitting the fan for 40 years now and hasn't let up and you clowns are now aware of the term "Sh!t hitting the fan".

Politards are idiots ......
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Feb 24, 2017 - 05:24pm PT
I would like to hear what "fear" has to say?
Psilocyborg

climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 05:32pm PT
Why does anyone trust the media?

The tide turned on 9/11. This was the beginning of the end for progressive thought in America. I don't think it was planned, it was just the way the cookie crumbled. Now liberal and conservative racism and bigotry is perfectly acceptable. Liberals used to be progressive, and now are regressing.

The internet has made people intellectually lazy, and no one thinks rationally any more. They do not question their partisan media outlets, or their government officials. Blind faith.

I was all for "Obama Care". I thought wow this is really something, probably one of the most important thing that has been done in my lifetime. It is a total f*#king scam. But no liberal in their right mind will even question it (or not enough to matter).

The media is not the enemy of americans, republicans, democrats, and liberal and conservative think tanks are our enemy. THEY are the rich
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 24, 2017 - 05:44pm PT
Not a new problem, this distrust of the press . . .

Thomas Jefferson writes about the press of his day.

http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendI_speechs29.html

History is always interesting.
ff
WBraun

climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 05:45pm PT
Psilocyborg nails it ......
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 05:47pm PT
allowed themselves to believe all the BS of the right wing media and Trump campaign, hold their noses and vote for him.

You don't realize that your sentence is internally inconsistent.

People like me didn't AT ALL "believe all the BS of the right wing media," and we didn't vote for him for ANY other reason than that you libs couldn't see your way clear to put up ANY other candidate than Clinton.

Given the horrors of Trump, give me Sanders as an alternative. Give me Warren. Give me (gaggg) Biden. Give me just about any warm body.

But noooo... you were committed to the dem that COULD NOT LOSE (but who then did), because YOU were so convinced that her corruption could be lightly overlooked by the half of this nation that does not turn a blind eye to it like you.

I've said before, and I'll repeat it until you finally get it. YOU wanted Clinton, and YOU got Trump. YOU produced this state of affairs because you were convinced that you could only WIN the zero-sum game. So, you believed that you didn't need to dialog and compromise. These very threads pre-election were endless evidences of your browbeating, name-calling, and general self-assured arrogance. And you got Trump.

This was your election to lose! And you lost it.

And you still insist that everybody else was stupid in some way.

That's fine. Just keep thinking that way and arguing as you do on threads like this one. You just assure future losses, which is fine by me, because I'm tired of liberal FORCE.

For my part, if Gorsuch is confirmed, Trump will have accomplished all I could hope for. Impeach Trump as you wish immediately after that result.

If Trump ends up having the chance to replace Ginsburg with somebody else like Gorsuch, so much the better. Then, certainly, impeach Trump if you can get the votes to do it.

With even one justice like Gorsuch on the court, the left's increasing rampage will have been dramatically slowed or halted. Good enough for me.
Eric Beck

Sport climber
Bishop, California
Feb 24, 2017 - 05:47pm PT
I've been out this afternoon and noticed a few observations regarding my initial comment:

Fat dad
Also, a vote for Trump was not a vote against the 1%. Again, incredibly naive. Try as he did to portray himself as a friend to the working man, this is a guy who has gotten to where he is by stepping on people, pure and simple. His only care is his own advancement.Quote Here

Fat, you may be right about Trump. As I said, I am not a Trump supporter. You missed my point however. Many who voted for Trump thought they were voting against 1% rule.

As an example of the CNN coverage of Trump, look at the endless anti Russian material they are pushing. This even predated the election with the coverage of the leaked/hacked DNC emails. Both CNN and Hillary constantly railed against Russian meddling in our political process. Yet, no one has disputed the content of these emails. The hypocrisy here is astounding. It is as if we would never interfere in the affairs of another country. This is true only if you want to ignore Iran, Honduras, Guatemala, Chile, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya.
WBraun

climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 05:50pm PT
Eric Beck nails it .....
DanaB

climber
CT
Feb 24, 2017 - 06:11pm PT
See? The game you're playing is EASY. You think that drive-by quips and "cleverness" (falsely so called) equates to argument and discussion. These threads are all the same: When confronted with their own inconsistencies, libs always devolve into Kindergarten behaviors, including name-calling and lame jibes.

What happened to you? You don't make sense anymore.
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Feb 24, 2017 - 06:12pm PT
DanaB.......................!
Here ya go ! Go climb my route !
then come back and say how hard it is. .,. ,
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Feb 24, 2017 - 06:14pm PT
You are basing your opinions on the belief that the media is somehow impartial or non partisan.
Yes, like Fox News.

The media has been lying and misleading people forever.

That is up to the people to determine, not the POTUS.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 06:16pm PT
What happened to you? You don't make sense anymore.

Yeah, that happens when, for effect, I temporarily mirror how certain people here "argue."

My point is that "clever" little quips that demean others are not useful dialog, and it's EASY to play that game, which is why so many here play it.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 06:18pm PT
That is up to the people to determine, not the POTUS.

Is Trump proposing some law I haven't heard about?

No?

Then he's entitled to both have and express any opinion he wishes.

See, that's the very freedom of speech you claim to care about. It works even when people (like even the POTUS) express opinions you don't like.
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Feb 24, 2017 - 06:22pm PT
I hope you got all that
Special Snow Flake !

Fvck you Dana I know tons more about the forming of the Preseve
And who did what to bring the Smileys on board to allow climbing
And then to shut down climbing than you ever will!
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Feb 24, 2017 - 06:27pm PT



Is Trump proposing some law I haven't heard about?

No?

Then he's entitled to both have and express any opinion he wishes.

Then the press is entitled to opine, as well.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 06:44pm PT
Then the press is entitled to opine, as well.

Absolutely!

Trump is just echoing what many are just coming to realize: ALL the press does is opine. The era of genuine journalism and news is behind us.

Lots of reasons for that, not the least of which is big-moneyed ownership of the vehicles. But the net effect is that ALL "news" now is editorial spin.

So, sure, it's "free" to be "the press" and spray all it wants.

But we, including Trump, are free to call a spade a spade and want nothing to do with it.
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Feb 24, 2017 - 06:44pm PT


Richard , right?

Madbolter1




Thanx for the compassion !
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 06:46pm PT
So fvck you Jim Brennan

Sadly, Jim, like so many others here, thinks that snark is a contribution.

I'm sorry for what you're going through, Gnome. Seriously.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:02pm PT
You'll follow that man anywhere.

No. I'm not a true-believer like you Clinton supporters. Oh, wait, you don't have Clinton to follow anywhere now, because she can't lead.

Show me Trump breaking the law (and PROVE it, you know), and then we'll talk seriously. Until then, you're just engaging in the very behaviors and speculations you loved to chide "the right" for.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:06pm PT
clinton supporters? bish please
zBrown

Ice climber
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:17pm PT
Ad infinitum! Suckit or swallow it.




The next post will be by one of the biggest swallowers.

rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:19pm PT
CMAC where in the hell are you.

Put the Freaks on the 3:10 to Yuma, never to be heard from again.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:23pm PT
rick knows the second, but not the first. and he needs help. from big daddy.

news flash rick. same train. many occupants.
nah000

climber
no/w/here
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:24pm PT
hey NutAgain!...

i like your style... i have the utmost respect for cmac and the gang including what they've created here on the interface that is st...

with that said, i also find it bizarre that they don't seem to get what they've created... of course they're free to do whatever they want and maybe the bulk of us truly do want a politard free zone where we can be a slightly more ribald version of mountain project and can discuss osha, who was the greatest climber of the 1950's, and whether ebs were better than rbs [should be obvious i aint got a fUckin clue whether that last question is correct, let alone if there is an answer]...

ie. while maybe the masses are cool when the supreme leaders nuke threads that people put intention into, only because someone made a complaint about a thread that got a bit heated... i ain't one of them.

ie. the nuking, rather than locking of NutAgain!'s more recent thread about dems is horse shIt...

i like climbing as much as the next gal, but if we can't discuss politics and shIt gets not only locked but nuked when it isn't "on topic" than fUck it, it looks like maybe it's time for me to search out a new venue for thought exposition and exchange...



it's been a fun ride and cheers to even those whose ideas i can hardly bare to read, let alone agree with... but...



the point: good on ya nut. without freedom this place is a wasteland... as such, i hope this thread sticks around...

while having every thread be about politics would make me leave...

having every thread be about climbing will make me leave faster...

it's been interesting [aka sad] watching this board capitulate, over the last few days, into a consistently sack licking attempt at becoming what the "creators" intended... [and in case there is any confusion, imo, part time sack licking is for the best... it's the full time version that becomes nauseating...]

anyway, that's it for now... cheers to all you folks.



here's one vote hoping this place remains undomesticated.

[/rant]
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:35pm PT
if we can't discuss politics and shIt gets not only locked but nuked when it isn't "on topic" than fUck it, it looks like maybe it's time for me to search out a new venue for thought exposition and exchange...

aww.

dearest Nahoo, we're good. the sh#t is still ok in the stew here.




crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:36pm PT
Steering the country into totalitarianism isn't breaking the law?
This isn't going to end well for him. There are still too many decent people left. And quality journalists.
nah000

climber
no/w/here
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:48pm PT
hey tb[little]c: i'm hopin' you're right.
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:49pm PT
As to what Nahooo said as usual
Here Here

He speaks for me Too
All of it , sack licking ? Well that's a bit far. . . . .. And its mountain Reject...

Madbolter,
Obviously it took me awhile to wrap my head around where you are on all this

I said back in August that win or lose we would have a Trump presidency.

As to decisively showing you the illegality the treason
Listen to President Bannon,
And follow the money.

Trump had failing casinos, and real estate tied to the success of those casinos

He took huge losses way more than he had to to declair bankruptcy
He used money from the Casinos to buy the miss universe pageant & then took the pageant
to Russia .,. ,.

Any Russian that was available to talk to trump acolytes was a Putin stooge
A member of Intelligence Culture , a Putin hand maiden by default
They all answer to the head of the Oligarchy Putin....

Dots start to connect ..

There was never any chance for Hitlery ., ., she , and the way over the top lib agenda
Were un-electable...

To much crap was forced on middle ( straight, homo-phobic, God fearing ) America For Bernie
To be electable either.

I'm all for some of the conservative principles , not all of them by a long shot.

I had hopes that the start of your inquisition into why the pussy grabber n thief
Is trying to suspend the free press and exclued any anti-regime voices
Especially. Any voice that point out the obvious of the compromised circumstances that would
Have anyone create chaos...

like putting un-vettable people who had to be gathered up and removed from secure positions.

Why would chaos be the rule of the day?
It is to tear the republic beyond repair ~ spoil the water and air ~ so to sell it back to us.
( the same with pot by the way, give it to big Pharma to destroy any good in it - make poison)

And it is the revenge of the fallen Soviet Union
That blames the USA, for its demise.

Putin's gambit ; he wins every way, . . . . . as democracy fails ....


Please look with that less jaundice eye that shows it self from time to time

( "any warm body other than. . . " )

Elizabeth Warren? Maybe? But you are right that elections have consequences
Let's hope my children can grow up in a more American existence than a re-make of a soviet style oligarchy. .
pud

climber
Sportbikeville & Yucca brevifolia
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:50pm PT
Rock climbers criticizing their president for doing things different than mainstream. Classic.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:52pm PT
Giving a venue to the likes of the Craigster, Crankcase, and freaks of the same Feather to endlessly spew their poison is a mistake. These political threads are not spirited debates, they're just a platform to propagandize a rejected ideology rooted in a useless, unworkable set of non realities meant to sew chaos and piss off any reasonable person.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 24, 2017 - 07:54pm PT
amendment 1 RS. Biyyotch!!!
nah000

climber
no/w/here
Feb 24, 2017 - 08:09pm PT
rick sumner: maybe.

and yet you [and me] are still here.

i remember reading threads on this joint during some of the bush years and it was, as i recall, exactly the opposite end of the spectrum, relative to now, that mostly held the floor.

while you, madbolter1 and cosmiccragsman [to pick on a few] may think it's one dimensional around here... as long as you dude/ttes stick around [and i frankly hope you do] it frankly isn't.

while there have been times when this board swung right... as of now it certainly, based on the most vocal, swings left.

doesn't mean it's not without value.

if you truly think this shIt is without value than what the fUck are you still doing here?



mountain project already created the climbing centric version of st...



and it's boring as shIt.
drF

Trad climber
usa
Feb 24, 2017 - 08:48pm PT
You'd watch the trains heading to the ovens and swear they were going to the beach resorts.
You'll follow that man anywhere. You're in too deep now to turn back.
WTF is Crankl00n talking about? Is this a part of your trust-fund program??
Fossil climber

Trad climber
Atlin, B. C.
Feb 24, 2017 - 09:08pm PT
NutAgain is absolutely right. We are at a critical point. Trump's stated policies perfectly fits the definition of neo-fascism, and control of the press is one of the most important steps in establishing an authoritarian state. If NutAgain hadn't initiated this thread, I would have. Thanks, NA.
monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 24, 2017 - 09:33pm PT
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Feb 24, 2017 - 09:37pm PT

Feb 24, 2017 - 06:44pm PT
Then the press is entitled to opine, as well.

Absolutely!

Trump is just echoing what many are just coming to realize: ALL the press does is opine. The era of genuine journalism and news is behind us.

Lots of reasons for that, not the least of which is big-moneyed ownership of the vehicles. But the net effect is that ALL "news" now is editorial spin.

So, sure, it's "free" to be "the press" and spray all it wants.

But we, including Trump, are free to call a spade a spade and want nothing to do with it.

Let's cut to the chase. "fake news" is news that is true, but Conservatives don't want to hear.
drF

Trad climber
usa
Feb 24, 2017 - 09:41pm PT
NutAgain is absolutely right. We are at a critical point. Trump's stated policies perfectly fits the definition of neo-fascism, and control of the press is one of the most important steps in establishing an authoritarian state. If NutAgain hadn't initiated this thread, I would have. Thanks, NA.

neo-Fascism....haha, throwing that term around again. Clueless.

Trump is not controlling the media. He's telling it to F-0FF! Most citizen's are as well. Love him or not...people are tired of the BS speculative stories/lies.
monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 24, 2017 - 09:59pm PT
"That was back in December at a panel sponsored by Politico. At the time, Spicer explained the plan to allow access to all press by saying "That's what makes a democracy a democracy, versus a dictatorship." But today, the WH press office did, in fact, bar specific media outlets"

[Click to View YouTube Video]
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2017 - 10:12pm PT
If Trump had used the power of his office to command our attention, and shared his concerns with who owns various media outlets, what personal agendas they might have, and how that colors the information we have at our disposal, well if Trump had done that my respect would have increased for him. And I would be reevaluate my perceptions of Trump's intentions. But he would paint himself into a corner if he did that, because the same arguments would be used to reject the media outlets that support his viewpoints too.

Also, we don't have to guess at motives or intentions for this selective attack on the press. Steve Bannon spelled it out clearly at the CPAC meeting:

They're corporatist, globally media, that are adamantly opposed, adamantly opposed, to a [sic] economic nationalist agenda like Donald Trump has. President Trump really laid this out, as Reince said, many years ago CPAC, it's really CPAC that originally gave him the springboard....
watch Steve's speech here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/02/23/bannon-trump-administration-is-in-unending-battle-for-deconstruction-of-the-administrative-state




I spent some time reviewing Fascism tonight, and I don't think that's what this movement or administration is about. In my admittedly cursory study of history, it seems that problems are not inherently caused by Fascism, or Communism, or Capitalism, or any other ism. The pattern that emerges in each of these systems in the last few hundred years, is this:
1. lots of unemployment and people suffering
2. some ideology becomes popular among the masses because of promises to resolve the problems, and somewhere at the core is a theme of blaming someone and a protectionist policy is aggressively developed around it
3. the party in power can't honor the economic promises it made in the rise to power, and they attempt to resolve this by creating employment through a war/crisis economy
4. in the march toward totalitarianism (which is justified as cutting red tape, bureaucracy, political roadblocks, obstructionist forces, etc.), freedoms of the press are curtailed, because if people don't know what you are doing, they can't get upset about it or rally in opposition to it.
5. The economic elements of Fascism and Communism and Capitalism are pretty different, but they share the commonality of purporting to solve the plight of the common unemployed people. In the end, the academic arguments are subordinated to the uglier side of humanity, the continual quest for power and control, to improve one's lot at the expense of another. Thus whatever economic context pre-exists the rise of totalitarianism is adapted as a stepping stone toward the consolidation of power. It is this power consolidation that is the biggest enemy of humanity more than any political or economic ideology that we have been taught to demonize.

While the political ideology of Trump and team does not seem to make analogies to Nazism truly apropos, the methods of rising to power and consolidating it bear striking resemblance to any economic system that marches toward a totalitarian state. I'm not a real historian, and I can't draw from a deep well of personally studied examples, but I trust my instincts to analyze systems and human motivations. Feel free to disagree with me, but please use rational arguments and don't cite the failings of other people as justifications for the present failings in our country.
ß Î Ø T Ç H

Boulder climber
ne'er–do–well
Feb 24, 2017 - 10:45pm PT
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 24, 2017 - 10:53pm PT
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/199166/20170224/fcc-chair-moves-to-halt-broadband-privacy-and-data-protection-rules-passed-in-october.htm
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2017 - 11:12pm PT
I don't know where Cmac draws the line, but I suspect a discussion focusing on government interfering with the press has a better chance of not getting banned than a simple expression of rejection of a specific person, no matter how repugnant we may find them.
Moof

Big Wall climber
Orygun
Feb 24, 2017 - 11:32pm PT
We are rapidly headed to a place where it will become dangerous to speak out against the current leader, and it will become more effective to shutup in public, and quietly work against him as anonomously as possible.
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Feb 24, 2017 - 11:33pm PT
The sh!t has been hitting the fan for 40 years now and hasn't let up and you clowns are now aware of the term "Sh!t hitting the fan".

Politards are idiots ......

You think the sh#t has been hitting the fan during your privileged life in America?

Do your attempts at demeaning insults ever get you anywhere?

People like me didn't AT ALL "believe all the BS of the right wing media," and we didn't vote for him for ANY other reason than that you libs couldn't see your way clear to put up ANY other candidate than Clinton.
And you still insist that everybody else was stupid in some way.

Again, I'm a moderate not a "lib". Do see in black and white? Or is "libs" just a convenient way for you to try to marginalize people with different viewpoints in your mind and ignore their valid points? I've read your posts, you seem very intelligent, but it seems you are allowing yourself to believe what you need to believe.

I'm an independent and have only voted for Republicans or Democrats a few times in the course of my life. Given the choice I would not have chosen Hillary as a candidate.

But once it was a choice between Hillary (whose worst issue to me was she used a private email server, like Colin Powell and other SOS BTW, and tried to cover it up, BUT when the emails were found on other people's systems it turned out that so far there were NO emails that showed serious criminality or corruption) vs. Trump who by his own words is a sexist, bigot, demagogue, thin skinned, narcissistic and lies far more often and more seriously than any other politician in recent history. I actually had to vote for Hillary.

I did not want to vote for another Clinton (or any relative or someone who has been in the white house recently). I didn't want to vote for someone who was dishonest. I didn't want to vote for someone who got rich by being involved in government.

But if you can justify all the horrible things Trump has said (and is now doing) because Hillary used a private email server and tried to cover it up, well, yes you are allowing yourself to believe BS.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 25, 2017 - 05:49am PT
^^^This. ^^^

Frankly, it's utterly pointless discussing anything with trumpkins. Most are brainwashed by breitbart and other fact-averse media bubbles shoveling propaganda at them. It's stupid and sad that they believe this garbage, but they do. Fortunately, most Americans aren't buying it.

Instead, you have to defeat them, and not bother reasoning with them. So roll up your sleeves, get fighting, and gear up for 2018, that is, if the whole Russian/emoluments clause clusterf*#k doesn't cause the whole shitshow to implode before then.
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Feb 25, 2017 - 06:54am PT
No , no implosion
The slow march to blatant (as opposed to opaque) totalitarian-ism will continue
Freedoms lost. . . .
Yes, the very definition of Neo-fascist authoritarian dictatorship
A strident puppet hoisted in to power by shadowy forces with clear goals of world domination
This is the com-upence that the Shadow government Cheeney /rumsfvcker put in place.
The vacuum of 8 yrs of the next puppet has led to a place where the next Mc Namara
Will insist that the strong-man puppet be left in power.

The elections were not free the court gave it away the last free election put the erection
Into the ovum & the old limp prick neo-fascists of the grand 'ole pussy-grabbers sided with the white supremist's & Russians
and bigots got what they were wishing for;
A Fakeer hand job & Blow job in the Oval Office .
Fat Dad

Trad climber
Los Angeles, CA
Feb 25, 2017 - 07:28am PT
Nut, Fet, Fossil, 10b, etc.,

This topic is critically important, but the sad fact is that you're argining with a binch of morons (for lack of a better term) who seem far too interested in arguing against their own best interests. It goes beyond a difference of opinion. It's a different reality to them. They're lost. I've very quickly become too frustrated trying to have a meaningful exchange with them. Good luck. I'm out.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 25, 2017 - 08:12am PT
Let's cut to the chase. "fake news" is news that is true, but Conservatives don't want to hear.
DanaB

climber
CT
Feb 25, 2017 - 08:19am PT
Yeah, that happens when, for effect, I temporarily mirror how certain people here "argue."

Okay, but I used to enjoy your posts. I may not have agreed with everything you wrote but you were logical and well-reasoned.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 25, 2017 - 08:20am PT
I am frustrated, as I'm sure people are on all sides. But walking away from the discussion is surrendering to the winds presently steering our country. I am not ok with that.

I have been waking up at night lately, fearful of the future of our country, fearful that the peace and stability and safety that I have always taken for granted within the USA in my lifetime is at risk. I worry about half of our nation owning guns and steeped in the idea of using them to defend themselves, and I worry about those same folks being trained to ignore facts and main-stream media and directly taking instruction from our President or his media mouthpieces who are steeped in rhetoric that plays up the need to use force to defend ourselves. I worry about a culture of well-armed and militarily organized immigration enforcement getting drunk on the power of breaking down doors to get rid of the "bad dudes", and where does that leave or country after this agency likes how it feels to break down millions of doors. Who is next on the list?


The next thing I thought about is how much I have not empathized with the plight of middle America, how they have spent more than a decade waking up from a different type of fear. The fear of their family starving, the fear and indignity of not being able to provide for their family, watching the world run away in growing proserity on TV while their future is bleak and scary. It is a real problem that has not received enough attention or understanding from the Democratic Party, which is one of the factors that led to where we are. There was and still is a degree of arrogance among Democrats that start by assuming their strategy is in the best interest of all these suffering unemployed people, and it seems logical that these people would support what is in their own interests. One mistake is assuming that people automatically understand the connection between their individual plights and the national policies, and another mistake is sending a mixed message by relying on corporate money and big donors to propagate the honest message.

In any case, many Americans have been living in fear for a long time, and because their concerns have not been addressed in a reasonable and direct way, they have become vulnerable to a blatantly false hope of economic prosperity, and this has become a Trojan Horse to bring in a slew of frightening ideologies that run counter to the American Dream and the vision that has sustained our country for centuries.

So all this lashing out at "stupid Republicans" and name calling and preparing for a big fight against our fellow citizens is climbing a ladder leading against the wrong wall. Think about where we want to end up, and realize that we can't get there by trying to force half the country to submit to a different will. The only reasonable solution will come from convincing people what is better for us all, by discussing with each other to really understand our different problems and perspectives and finding a framework that works for as many people as possible.

Fighting with force and planning to exclude a big part of our society from the vision seems like the easier and more effective path, but this ends with us just as guilty of creating a tyranny as that which many of us presently fear. The roots of authoritarianism are not the exclusive property of right-wing folks. Right or left can lead to the same outcome, and to fend this off we need to avoid demonizing people, avoid making scapegoats, and concentrate our attention on what we need in our society to make life better for as many of us as possible.

It seems that focusing on what we DO want is more productive and effective than focusing on what we DON'T want. There needs to be a constructive vision to rally around.
Having a plurality of media voices with widespread access to the information emanating from our government, seems to be a critical pillar of serving the interests of as many people as possible. I want prosperity for us all, I want a vigorous debate of ideas but I don't want to be at war with Republicans or Trumpers or conservatives or whatever label you want. Those labels are the way of turning us against each other when we all are at risk and we all just want to have better lives for ourselves and our families.







TradEddie

Trad climber
Philadelphia, PA
Feb 25, 2017 - 08:25am PT
Sure, POTUS has the same freedom of speech as the rest of us, but his responsibility to exercise that freedom is in proportion to the reach of his words. His calling free press the enemy of the people is not yet the equivalent of shouting fire in a theater, but it is coming closer. Suppose some right wing nutcase starts shooting up CNN offices? Suppose someone shoots an immigrant, just because he looks middle eastern...

HRC is not, has never been and will never be POTUS. This is not about HRC, and this is not about partisan politics. These threads and protests would not be happening if Bush, Kasich, Cruz or similar had won. This is about the dangers of having an unstable thin skinned moron in the White House, and having a spineless congress unwilling to do anything about it.

Partisan politics is arguing about the best road to take to the same crag, or perhaps what's the best climb when we get there. Electing trump is like asking someone who's never driven a car to drive us there, even though he really plans to go to another crag. Like asking someone who's only ever ridden a motorbike and crashed that six times. The question now is how to get him out of the driver seat with only a few dings before he drives the car off a cliff. The replacement driver takes a crazy road to the crag, but he's at least trying to bring us to the same place and has a vague idea of how to do it.

TE
Happiegrrrl2

Trad climber
Feb 25, 2017 - 10:01am PT
More of the bread crumbs I have been finding scattered among Twitter Feeds:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/there-s-more-to-the-michael-cohen-story

Excerpt from article that would best be read in the whole to place into context, and it should be duly noted (before someone points it out suggesting I either have poor reading comprehension skills or "only see what I want to see") that the author says straight out that, being fairly unfamiliar with Ukraine and the country's language, he isn't able to verify the content on his own.

And then there's this.

Artemenko told Strana.ua that this wasn't the first time they'd talked about the "peace plan." He says that he was discussing the peace plan with Cohen and Sater “at the time of the primaries, when no one believed that Trump would even be nominated.”

So at least according to Artemenko, discussions about the "peace plan" go back to the first half of 2016.

That's interesting.

There is another link within the article, that includes this little bit:
Artemenko said his plan would let Ukrainian voters decide in a referendum whether to lease Crimea to Russia for a term of 50 or 100 years, according to the New York Times.

I have thought this before and it has been laughed off by people who know more on the subject, that Russia has figured out a way to physically alter election results. I posit that they first did it for the Brexit vote, and then the US presidential(and possibly a few GOP down the ladder), and that they were/are intending to do it with this Ukrainian referendum mentioned above.

Why? Because(and it has been stated in reliable accounts several times) they want a less "Western-centric" political/economic world. (end of what has been stated, and now back to my opinion)

They are sick of being looked at as the bad guy, when they have so much to offer, and want their seat at the Big Person's table during holiday feasts. Trashing NATO was/is one step in the strategy. Screwing GB was a big win for the strategy, and IF they put Trump in place, and the things that it is really beginning to look like he was involved with over the years are accurate, that was also a very important accomplishment towards the goal.

Donald Trump has joked meanly about the DNC and their lack of an adequate firewall for the servers. He had better hope he has a much more robust one in place for his personal protection.

Satter will talk, when it becomes clear he is a dead man either way, because that's how people behave when grasping at last hopes for survival, even when those hopes are no longer rational. And when he tells what he knows - IF he hasn't already! - the rest of the pieces in the puzzle fall into place. The only way out is for Satter to run and hide. Maybe that will happen - hopefully there are some good eyes being kept on him.

And for those who want to wail "That's not proof!" No sh#t, sherlock. If it was proof it would be already old news and DT would be crying "I was framed" from a cell, and Melania would be crying "He's left me with no way to support myself and my child(which, unfortunately will be true, as his assets will be frozen, and I have zero doubt that the man is brutally cruel enough to have the back doors and offshores locked tight with no hidden key left for wife number three.).
Bushman

climber
The state of quantum flux
Feb 25, 2017 - 10:13am PT

A New Presidential Mandate
or
The Ugliest American

I love hurling insults
That makes me feel good
I like proving that I'm right
Like daddy said I should
I love feeling superior
Because I believe I am
In the history of the world I'll be
The ugliest American

I shall vilify the media
And freedom of the press
Because they disagree with truth
What a colossal mess
And ban the Muslims outright
Because they pose a threat
And all who would oppose me
You'll be my target yet

I'll build a wall to keep you out
To protect those of my race
And the army shall deport you
And punch you in the face
Your parents and your children
Will be the next to go
Then I'll be going down the list
Of protesters you know

If they don't like my pipeline
They'll be lying on the ground
When tanks roll o'er their backsides
My mandate will be sound
To make our country great again
Some folks will have to lose
Like Hitler's racial cleansing of
All those filthy Jews

And you won't have to worry
If you can hold a job
But if you're old or infirm
I'm not a heartless snob
Your family can support you
And care for you as well
Because they'll get some benefits
Employed by my hotels

And if you feel objectified
Or disgust and outright fear
You deserve all my betrayal
If you're lesbian, bi, tranny, or queer
I don't mind if your offended
By my patriarchal patronizing
It's the least that I can do for you
You'll soon be be realizing

I love hurling insults
That makes me feel good
I like proving that I'm right
Like daddy said I should
I love feeling superior
Because I believe I am
In the history of the world I'll be
The ugliest American

-Big Daddy
02/25/2017
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 25, 2017 - 10:32am PT
I have been waking up at night lately



thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 25, 2017 - 10:36am PT
you read a lot of news pyro?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 25, 2017 - 10:45am PT
lots of news all over the T.V.
too bad media is just another talk show
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 25, 2017 - 11:02am PT
do you read, pyro?
jaaan

Trad climber
Chamonix, France
Feb 25, 2017 - 11:39am PT
OK, this is a serious question. Not knowing too much about the way the US political system works, (but frightened to death about what the idiot might do next) what is needed to trigger - if that's the right word - an impeachment?
Fat Dad

Trad climber
Los Angeles, CA
Feb 25, 2017 - 11:53am PT
OK, one final comment. Part of my decision not to try to contribute to such threads any longer is the realization that many of the trumpites (madbolter, TGT2, pyro) were not misled by the media to arrive at their conclusions. That had those already, and Trump came by spouting their own views back at them. Hitler didn't create nazism out of nowhere. He tapped into a sentiment that already believed what they wanted to believe. When I see a Trump supporter respond to a criticism of Trump by saying "you still don't understand why he won", that only serves to ratify my belief even further. Sure, some folks did buy his snake oil routine, but others, like madbolter, were already there. While he'll happily listen to folks like Alex Jones, who's hateful propaganda will further cements his views, he'll never respond to responsible, well sourced journalism. I fear a good part of our nation has crossed a divide it will never return from.
Marlow

Sport climber
OSLO
Feb 25, 2017 - 12:01pm PT

...many of the trumpites (madbolter, TGT2, pyro) were not misled by the media to arrive at their conclusions. They had those already, and Trump came by spouting their own views back at them.... (Trump) tapped into a sentiment that already believed what they wanted to believe...

This is what happened when I asked my dog if he wanted to go for a walk:

monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 25, 2017 - 12:52pm PT
Jaaan, it starts in the house of representatives.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_States#House_of_Representatives
perswig

climber
Feb 25, 2017 - 01:04pm PT
Just weighing in to say thanks to NutAgain! for continuing to take on the frustration of Sisyphus, always with thoughtfulness and an open mind. Regardless of sides, these things seem in increasing demand and in limited supply (and I'm as guilty as the next guy).

Dale
jaaan

Trad climber
Chamonix, France
Feb 25, 2017 - 01:55pm PT
it starts in the house of representatives.

To bring articles of impeachment against a president requires a majority vote in the House of Representatives. When the case is tried by the Senate, a vote of at least 2/3 of those present is required to convict and remove the president from office.

So how likely would it be that anyone would be brave enough to initiate proceedings?
monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 25, 2017 - 01:56pm PT
They would have to have a pretty good idea that there was a consensus to do it.

Since house is controlled by Repubs, it would take an astonishing act with terrible consequence for impeachment to start.
Wade Icey

Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
Feb 25, 2017 - 02:21pm PT
MB1=constitutional cherry picker.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Feb 25, 2017 - 02:35pm PT
They would have to have a pretty good idea that there was a consensus to do it.

Since house is controlled by Repubs, it would take an astonishing act with terrible consequence for impeachment to start.

Unfortunately, at this point in time, I don't see that trump has committed a treasonous act, or maybe we don't know about it.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 25, 2017 - 03:20pm PT
For TGT


WASHINGTON ― As a team of elite U.S. commandos found themselves under unexpectedly heavy fire in a remote Yemeni village last month, eight time zones away, their commander in chief was not in the Situation Room.

It’s unclear what he, personally, was doing. But his Twitter account was busy promoting an upcoming appearance on the Christian Broadcasting Network.

“I will be interviewed by @TheBrodyFile on @CBNNews tonight at 11pm. Enjoy!” read a tweet from President Donald Trump’s personal account on Saturday, Jan. 28.

monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 25, 2017 - 05:07pm PT
The snowflake in chief won't attend the White House Correspondents Dinner. His ego would melt at the first joke aimed at him.

Another path to impeachment might be if the repubs think Trump can't get reelected. That way they get their boy Pence in. Can an impeached and convicted prez run again?

Edit: The Senate can decide if he can run again.
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 25, 2017 - 05:19pm PT
What boggles the mind is that any of these people think that suppressing the media is going to lead to greater personal freedom, a better economy, or a Great America.
Yury

Mountain climber
T.O.
Feb 25, 2017 - 09:06pm PT
I want to share my own experience.
I witnessed creation of #fakenews by the liberal journalist working for the liberal Globe and Mail newspaper. He added one word to a neutral report of international organization when tweeting about it thus completely changing its meaning.
I was not sure whether he did it on purpose or just made an error.
I pointed to this error on Twitter and sent an e-mail to an edditor of this newspaper.
Neither this journalist nor edditor responded to me, corrected this #fakenews or apologized.
I got a perception that they were OK with creation of #fakenews.

It seems to me that such liberal treatment of news is a new norm for a liberal Mainstream Media.
I am not sure I understand why NutAgain! is trying to defend it.

Limiting access to a president would only decrease amount of created #fakenews.
I do not see anything wrong with this.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 25, 2017 - 09:13pm PT
'fake news' is just another fringe-right meme of distraction and part of a deliberate pre-emptive assault on the fourth estate because trumpco knows they can't get away with the majority of their agenda if there is appropriate media oversight. It's a particularly ironic meme for the right to wield given rightwing radio jocks and fox news have been cranking out bullshit and lies under the loose guise of 'journalism' and 'news' for the last two decades.

Only a rube would buy into such bullsh#t.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 25, 2017 - 10:11pm PT
I want to share my own experience.
I witnessed creation of #fakenews by the liberal journalist working for the liberal Globe and Mail newspaper. He added one word to a neutral report of international organization when tweeting about it thus completely changing its meaning.
I was not sure whether he did it on purpose or just made an error.
I pointed to this error on Twitter and sent an e-mail to an edditor of this newspaper.
Neither this journalist nor edditor responded to me, corrected this #fakenews or apologized.
I got a perception that they were OK with creation of #fakenews.

It seems to me that such liberal treatment of news is a new norm for a liberal Mainstream Media.
I am not sure I understand why NutAgain! is trying to defend it.

Limiting access to a president would only decrease amount of created #fakenews.
I do not see anything wrong with this.

Yury, you post from the position of a serf, bowing to the wisdom of a central gov't whose pronouncements are not subject to scrutiny. You accept central authority as fundamentally correct and unquestionable.

Americans march to a different drummer, full of skepticism for things pronounced by the gov't.

You advocate for a system in which the gov't is not able to be questioned on the statement it makes, from Sweden to crowd size. Your position appears to be that you don't care what the actual truth is, only that things be said and one forcefully.

We do things here different.
Yury

Mountain climber
T.O.
Feb 26, 2017 - 06:48am PT
Ken M

Yury, you post from the position of a serf, bowing to the wisdom of a central gov't whose pronouncements are not subject to scrutiny. You accept central authority as fundamentally correct and unquestionable.
Ken M, please do not project your own thoughts onto me.
Unlike modern liberals I value freedom and am concerned about establishment of a totalitarian state similar to what already been done by lefties in Russia and China.

Trump is a temporary phenomenon.
Corruption of Mainstrea Media is much more dangerous.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 26, 2017 - 06:57am PT
Corruption of Mainstrea Media is much more dangerous.

Except right now media corruption in mainstream media on a scale 0-100 is around 5 or less whereas, if one were to consider trumpco as a news organization, it would rank them at about 95. There's never been anything comparable in the history of the United States presidency.

#impeachthedespot
c wilmot

climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 07:00am PT
You sound like a separatist healyje...
nah000

climber
no/w/here
Feb 26, 2017 - 07:04am PT
in response to Ken M's post [and written the same time as yury's most recent post]:

considering yury didn't mention the press changing a government's narrative but rather one put out by an "int'l organization" that whole diatribe above is #fakeinterpretation aka #strawman.

that said, i am curious yury if you could give the exact change that was made. 'cause as it is all we have is your word and your blame of liberal media. ie. without the original wording and the actual change that was made it's just one more claim from a relatively anonymous source.

which is one of the big problems we have these days: if you pay attention, a huge percentage of our political news is based on anonymous sources. the "news" has been turned into gossip and conduits for disgruntled government departments and intelligence agency mis/information far far too much of the time.

while the amount of comprehensively "fake news" is, imo, not as large as people are saying, there certainly is a lot of "skewed news" and "anonymously sourced news".



oh well, gotta get those clicks and ducats.

and we keep clicking and buying.
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 26, 2017 - 07:25am PT
Here's an excellent article on "fake news" from Columbia School of Journalism:
http://www.cjr.org/special_report/fake_news_history.php

ff
c wilmot

climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 07:31am PT




our media refers to illegals as immigrants- making no note of the difference between illegal immigrants and legal immigrants. they call islamic terrorist groups "rebels" while referring to Ukrainians who still support their democratically elected president "separatists"

A repost. Clear examples of fake news. The media has conditioned so many to believe their spin to the point that you are being fed fake news about... fake news
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Feb 26, 2017 - 08:04am PT
our media refers to illegals as immigrants- making no note of the difference between illegal immigrants and legal immigrants. they call islamic terrorist groups "rebels" while referring to Ukrainians who still support their democratically elected president "separatists"

A repost. Clear examples of fake news. The media has conditioned so many to believe their spin to the point that you are being fed fake news about... fake news


Your definition of fake news cannot be found in any dictionary.
Marlow

Sport climber
OSLO
Feb 26, 2017 - 08:20am PT
A retired Navy Seal who was an architect of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden has warned that Donald Trump’s attack on the press as an enemy of the American people “may be the greatest threat to democracy in my lifetime”.

Retired admiral William McRaven, the former commander of the Joint Special Operations Command and later the US Special Operations Command, issued his defense of the media during a Tuesday late-afternoon lecture to journalism students at the University of Texas, where he serves as chancellor.

McRaven, himself a journalism graduate of the school, referred to the press as “the single most important institution in this republic” and said: “This may be the most important time for journalism that I have seen in decades. Probably we need you now more than ever before.”

McRaven did not issue a personal criticism of Trump, nor a broader critique of his administration. But he directly referenced “the president” in objecting to Trump’s stated perspective on the US press.

“On February 17, the president said the news media is the enemy of the American people. The news media is the enemy of the American people,” McRaven said, according to a video of the speech the University of Texas made available to the Guardian.

“This sentiment may be the greatest threat to democracy in my lifetime, this sentiment,” McRaven said to applause.

“I will tell you, as journalism majors, as Americans, you should challenge that sentiment and that statement every opportunity you can. We must challenge this statement and this sentiment that the news media is the enemy of the American people.”
Happiegrrrl2

Trad climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:00am PT
Let me try to understand this:

Our current POTUS proclaimed that dead people, illegal immigrants and multi-state registered voters reduced his Popular Vote win, by millions(and none of those "fraudulent votes" went for him, as an added claim). Turns out that several in his own family and immediate acquaintance are registered in multiple states. But we are expected to believe(and we do, because it is reasonable belief) that they are not the illegal vote-casting "bad ombres" POTUS means.

Wouldn't one say that the POTUS's claims are an example of fake news? Or do we blame the media sources who quoted his words/played video?

That is but ONE example.

Anyone who can not see CLEARLY that POTUS has a credibility problem, is beyond hope with regards to reasonable debate. Sorry - just stating the obvious.

Look - you can believe, if you like, that the NYT is misinforming - that's your prerogative. Just like it is the prerogative to allow people to DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES whether The National Enquirer is factual or fiction. I say, let the Enquirer sit in with the press conferences, and also don't bar any others. "Onion?" Certainly. We, the People, can be left to our own devices, and if we are too dim to figure out what's what - then that is on us.
c wilmot

climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:05am PT
You believe the Russian nonsense despite the fact no evidence to support the claims has been provided. What makes trumps claims any different?

Yury

Mountain climber
T.O.
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:09am PT
nah000

that said, i am curious yury if you could give the exact change that was made.
Case 1 (distortion of the fact): When central Ukrainian government started latest attack against Eastern Ukrainian separatists, OSCE published a report with the counts of explosions and their geographic locations without mentioning who was responsible:
http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm/296961

The Globe and Mail journalist retweeted this news as "So yesterday OSCE monitors recorded 10,330 Russian rocket & artillery explosions ..." thus creating anti-Russian #fakenews.

If you study geographic locations of these explosion with a detailed map of this area, you can conclude that this was shelling by central Ukrainian government.

It was the only time I contacted this newspaper, because I initially assumed that this could have been just an error caused by poor intelligence and hastiness of Doug Saunders.


Case 2 (omission): When report was less ambiguous, it was just ignored:


monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:19am PT
If you study geographic locations of these explosion with a detailed map of this area, you can conclude that this was shelling by central Ukrainian government.

Oh, ok, if you say so. But we know what dog in this fight you support though.

Why don't you find something in this country to show the bias, something we have an experience with. And apply your 'rigorous' analysis to both left and right..
Yury

Mountain climber
T.O.
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:24am PT
healyje

Except right now media corruption in mainstream media on a scale 0-100 is around 5 or less whereas, if one were to consider trumpco as a news organization, it would rank them at about 95.
I am puzzled by attempts to whitewash Mainstream Media.
Let's discuss one more example.
As a preparation for a war against Serbia in 1999:
1) Mainstream Media published a lot of stories about crimes committed by Serbs against Muslims (it was a mix of real facts and #fakenews).
2) Mainstream Media carefully avoided even mentioning of ethnical cleansing of Serbs by Croats in Serbska Krajina and Eastern Slavonia.

By such lopsided information Mainstream Media was able to brainwash Americans and ensure support for a war against Serbia.

Providing lopsided information is as dangerous as direct #fakenews.

I do not believe that an honest person would give a 5% corruption score to MSM that was used to justify an unjust war.
Yury

Mountain climber
T.O.
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:32am PT
monolith

Oh, ok, if you say so. But we know what dog in this fight you support though.
monolith, if you do not trust me, just do this research yourself.
You need to come up with a more detailed analysis if you want to dismiss my claim.

Unfortunately I found that it was typical for my liberal friends to use ad hominem attack when exposed to uncomfortable facts and ideas.

Why don't you find something in this country to show the bias, something we have an experience with. And apply your 'rigorous' analysis to both left and right..
You can find such analysis on the Internet.
You may not be aware of it because it was not reported by MSM and your liberal social media friends.
Please use Google.
I shared my story because it was the only time I contacted a newspaper.
monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:36am PT
Your history tells us you won't give a fair analysis. Somehow I don't think your observations would stand a chance in a forum that had Ukranians familiar with both sides of the conflict.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:38am PT
Why don't you find something in this country to show the bias, something we have an experience with. And apply your 'rigorous' analysis to both left and right..

Well, a good example would be the 'yuge' percentage of media coverage of the Dems'
Viet Nam War which parroted the Johnson Administration's BS.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Sands Motel , Las Vegas
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:38am PT
Trump has taken on the role of the boy who cried wolf... his worshippers , Kellyanne and Spicer , keep running to rescue him from his latest fabricated media crisis... Most of the press are not falling for Trump's dog and pony show so Trump doubles down with his personal media assault and tries to villanize them just like he did Hillary with the phony email crisis..This proves that there will always be enough gullible citizens willing to jump off the cliff when someone tells them to....It works both ways liberal or conservative ..Remember the weapons of mass destruction fake news and where that led us..?
Yury

Mountain climber
T.O.
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:41am PT
monolith

Your history tells us you won't give a fair analysis. Somehow I don't think your observations would stand a chance in a forum that had Ukranians familiar with both sides of the conflict.
Again, you assume too much.

By the way, do you know that Western Ukrainian patriots advocate for more decisive attacks on separatists and blame central Ukrainian government for indecisiveness?

Please learn how to spell the word "Ukrainian".

If you want to learn more about the history of modern Ukraine, please go to Polish and Hebrew versions of the Wikipedia page on Stepan Bandera (who is a role model and a hero for modern Ukrainians) and translate these pages into English.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:50am PT
A top Republican just called for a special prosecutor to investigate the Trump Administration's communications with Russia.

Explain how that is of no consequence, based on what you know from the national security briefings you have been a part of lately
monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 26, 2017 - 10:09am PT
Good one Yury, now you are going after typos. BTW, I have discussed this situation with some Ukrainian climbers and colleagues, and they present a completely different picture. So we await watching you debate people who are deeply familiar with this situation.
Studly

Trad climber
WA
Feb 26, 2017 - 10:10am PT
This is the horse and the hound and the horn
That belonged to the farmer sowing his corn
That kept the rooster that crowed in the morn
That woke the judge all shaven and shorn
That married the man all tattered and torn
That kissed the maiden all forlorn
That milked the cow with the crumpled horn
That tossed the dog that worried the cat
That killed the rat that ate the malt
That lay in the house that Jack built.

Many people prefer to buy their head in the sand or up their ass rather then face the fact that our MSM is not only at least 50% fabrication but is a mind and thought control device to insure compliance by the population. To think other wise is a fairy tale, not that there is anything wrong with fairies..
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Sands Motel , Las Vegas
Feb 26, 2017 - 10:46am PT
I am partial to SAND...rj
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 26, 2017 - 11:31am PT
The general issue of veracity in news outlets is an important one, but I think there are no simple solutions. Every private owner will have a bias they want to enforce, and government owned sources will reinforce the position of the current administration. Best we can realistically hope for is transparency of ownership so we as citizens can evaluate the source of news when fitting it into a broader jigsaw of information (real or fake) to form our judgments.

I don't see how it can end well if a current government administration is in the position of vetting news sources and picking winners/losers. Fox guarding the hen house.

So fake news sucks, but government selectively blocking access to public news agencies is worse.
c wilmot

climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 11:34am PT

So fake news sucks, but government selectively blocking access to public news agencies is worse.

More fake news...
Marlow

Sport climber
OSLO
Feb 26, 2017 - 11:42am PT

During war the media are not to be trusted anywhere on earth. They most often buy into the war propaganda of their own country.

Mr. Trump is not at war, but behaves like he is.

Well wait, he is at war, he is at war with the media, with the FBI, with his own staff in The white house. And is this because the media, the FBI and The white house staff are pathetic liers?

No, it is because he is trying to use his presidential power to push everybody around him into accepting his lies as facts.

Fake news and MSM are words to be taken as an honourable mention when they come from Mr. Trump's mouth.

Just like the word deplorables is when uttered by Ms. Clinton.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 11:43am PT
how is fake news not....lying?
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 26, 2017 - 11:45am PT
Ken M, please do not project your own thoughts onto me.
Unlike modern liberals I value freedom and am concerned about establishment of a totalitarian state similar to what already been done by lefties in Russia and China.

Yury, you are filled with delusions that you think that Russia or China are ruled by the left.

“Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.”
― George Orwell

“You are a slow learner, Winston."
"How can I help it? How can I help but see what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four."
"Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane.”
― George Orwell, 1984

c wilmot

climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 11:45am PT
We have been at war for longer than any period in American history.
Marlow

Sport climber
OSLO
Feb 26, 2017 - 11:49am PT

To Trump all facts that do not support his conclusive lies are seen as fake news. When Trump says fake news, he is most often talking about valid facts that do not support his conclusions. And inbetween, as an exception, the lier Trump is also using fake news about lies. Even the lier Trump can inbetween have a valid point.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 12:02pm PT
Rogue POTUS Staff
‏@RoguePOTUSStaff


*I have so much power just in my voice. I keep saying the word and they'll be bankrupt

POTUS explaining his revenge against news outlets.
Marlow

Sport climber
OSLO
Feb 26, 2017 - 12:06pm PT

Last week, after Spicer became aware that information had leaked out of a planning meeting with about a dozen of his communications staffers, he reconvened the group in his office to express his frustration over the number of private conversations and meetings that were showing up in unflattering news stories, according to sources in the room.

Upon entering Spicer’s office for what one person briefed on the gathering described as “an emergency meeting,” staffers were told to dump their phones on a table for a “phone check," to prove they had nothing to hide.

Spicer, who consulted with White House counsel Don McGahn before calling the meeting, was accompanied by White House lawyers in the room, according to multiple sources.

There, he explicitly warned staffers that using texting apps like Confide — an encrypted and screenshot-protected messaging app that automatically deletes texts after they are sent — and Signal, another encrypted messaging system, was a violation of the Presidential Records Act, according to multiple sources in the room.

The phone checks included whatever electronics staffers were carrying when they were summoned to the unexpected follow-up meeting, including government-issued and personal cellphones.
Happiegrrrl2

Trad climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 12:18pm PT
You believe the Russian nonsense despite the fact no evidence to support the claims has been provided. What makes trumps claims any different?

I am watching the reporting going on about the Russian stuff, and seeing where it leads. Those who are posting their research and findings are including sources as to where they have gotten the information. They aren't just making accusations about end results, but writing "this is what we are seeing so far, and it looks very much like such and such. I haven't seen anything that said "He's guilty and here's the proof" yet - but yes, I do expect it will be coming. I expect that at some point his lawyer is going to be in a real pickle, and then we'll see. I suppose the president can always promise to pardon him....
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 26, 2017 - 12:38pm PT
fact that our MSM is not only at least 50% fabrication

a) wrong

but is a mind and thought control device

b) moronic

c) and ironic as f*#k coming from a master fabricator
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 26, 2017 - 01:12pm PT
Well Marlow, it may be relatively low level war, but we are indeed at war. We have troops on the ground in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan.
Marlow

Sport climber
OSLO
Feb 26, 2017 - 01:43pm PT

I know, Survival. The US is at war on foreign ground as the US usually is and has been for many years. But first and foremost the American president now seems to be at "war" with the media, the FBI and his own staff...
Norton

Social climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 01:49pm PT
So, help me out will you?

I keep reading that the Main Stream Media (CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, etc) is guilty of "fake news"

also that the same above media sources "can't be trusted" to put out the truth

In addition to reading many online news media sources, both biased left and right, I also watch
the news broadcasts from the Main Stream Media.

I do not see strong evidence that lies (fake news) is being put out there by the MSM

do they get some things wrong sometimes, yes and when they do they generally publish corrections

but by and large, and yes very significantly so, the MSM's reporting can easily be fact checked from multiple credible sources for accuracy

so, let me hear exactly what the MSM has "lied" about, lots of examples please

yeah, I know the NY Times bought the Bush lies about WMDs in Iraq, etc, but what has the NY Times, LA Times, Washington Post been "lying" about lately?

but let's stay in current time, take say just the last couple of months, what exactly have the
MSM put out there that are clear lies that are in such clear and large quantities that have made you come to the conclusion that the "MSM can't be trusted to tell the truth" etc?
Marlow

Sport climber
OSLO
Feb 26, 2017 - 01:53pm PT

Norton

Who is the "you" in your message?
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Feb 26, 2017 - 02:03pm PT
Norton, I studiously avoid watching any of the news orgs you cited before or after meals.
The only news I can stomach on a regular basis is BBC. The only news I regularly read
is Reuters and The Economist.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 26, 2017 - 02:09pm PT
Almost none of those were officially published pieces of those various msm outlets - they are twitter and facebook posts by members of their staffs. The one, by Time was immediately retracted by it's author.

Real and deliberate fake news by fox in an attempt to support of trump's Sweden comments:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/02/25/who-is-nils-bildt-swedish-national-security-advisor-interviewed-by-fox-news-is-a-mystery-to-swedes/?utm_term=.6d195695ee46



survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 26, 2017 - 03:40pm PT
As you can see, most of the recent Trump witch hunt against the media is entirely self inflicted, because of their own leaky staff. To which I laugh robustly.
http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2017/02/05/leaks-already-plaguing-trump-administration.cnn
WBraun

climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 03:49pm PT
You guys are the MSM clowns here.

Everytime MSM spits something out you rush over here to regurgitate it here.

You fools believe everything coming out of that propaganda machine .....

You clowns are as brainwashed as Trump. There's no difference.
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 26, 2017 - 04:15pm PT
Crankster wrote:
This anti-MSM nonsense...hard to know where the brainwashing began....talk radio, I suppose.

Oh, I think the brainwashing has always been a part of religion and politics. 'Way before radio. Yes, we need to keep laughing most robustly. I'm for freedom, especially in the mountains. :) And of the press as well. But we must realize that there is a market shift of significant proportions. How long can dead tree news stay meaningful? A technologically more sophisticated audience with more options is going to shop around for reliable news sources. Reuters seems pretty good. I have very few complaints with the Economist. By and large, the WSJ seems to be factual. But when anyone can publish through a social network directly, what does MSM have left but commentary and interpretation? When instead of sending out a press release, people send out a tweet?

It's a new game, how we share information, as big a leap as the printing press, probably much more so.

So much of the MSM has relied on market share to drive revenue from advertising that I wonder how their revenue streams are holding up against the freedom of the press that we currently enjoy with such offerings as YouTube, etc. Is Julian Assange still around?
feralfae
monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 26, 2017 - 05:43pm PT
Fox News interviews fake Swedish Defense and National Security Advisor

https://theintercept.com/2017/02/25/fox-news-interview-fake-expert-sweden-baffles-swedes/
nah000

climber
no/w/here
Feb 26, 2017 - 05:58pm PT
thanks yury...

i don't know which is worse: manipulating authority... or followers whose hope/cynicism springs eternal.
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 26, 2017 - 06:11pm PT
Thanks FPU.
I'm so glad Fox got caught at pulling one of these shenanigans! I wonder who is keeping score of all these exposures. I hope someone has a score card. It will be interesting to see at the end of a year or two how audiences shift and re-group.

Yes, the medium is the message. The message seems to be fairly clear: we have entered a time of communication anarchy, where there is a significant lowering of the hierarchy of hurdles to gain entry into the Global conversation and commerce.

The hubris of Fox, thinking they could get away with such blatant ethical violations and not get caught, is amusing. Their hunger for sensationalism is revolting. But I must admit that I find CNN and all of MSM no less guilty of such hubris.

(feralfae climbs down off her soapbox)
ff
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 26, 2017 - 06:24pm PT
I wonder how many obama phones were used to post in this thread?
Norton

Social climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 06:24pm PT
I wonder who is keeping score of all these exposures. I hope someone has a score card.


for many years now there has been a very good media watchdog keeping track

https://mediamatters.org
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 26, 2017 - 06:31pm PT
Norton, thank you, but they are hardly an unbiased source of news.

"Media Matters for America is a far-left activist organization with strong ties ... Since 2004, Media Matters has monitored conservative media and ..." from a link on the front page of my search engine, and by their own self-identification, a progressive outfit. And I certainly don't trust the far-right either.

I will look around and see if I can find a source that is least biased.
Thank you though.
ff
Happiegrrrl2

Trad climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 06:34pm PT
I wonder how many obama phones were used to post in this thread?

You are aware, I hope, that what you call an "obama phone" has been available to people for something like thirty years.... The Lifeline Assistance program was started during Reagan's time in office.



feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 26, 2017 - 06:38pm PT
Excellent plan, but when I enter a site, and it shows a strong bias in its initial images and a sensationalist style of writing, I am immediately turned off by what I perceive to be "yellow journalism". But you are right. I will go back and examine a few of their offerings, and delve into their bombastic style, cringing, and then, as far as I am able, I will weigh what I find against other sources of knowledge.
Thank you for the suggestion, which pointed out my own bias against flamboyance in the press to me. Maybe blinking neon and twirling sunbursts are necessary for some viewers. I will give your suggestion a try.
Thank you.
ff
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Feb 26, 2017 - 06:39pm PT
Norton, do you even know the difference between "lies" and "fake news"?

Why the hate to conflate?
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 26, 2017 - 06:40pm PT
I had no idea what an obama phone was. Huh.
I don't have a cell phone, either. Threw it in the Kootenai River years ago, which was irresponsible of me, but got rid of a lot of stress.

I must go do some research based on crankster's excellent suggestion.
ff
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Sands Motel , Las Vegas
Feb 26, 2017 - 07:53pm PT
Pyro gets his news from Cosmic...Give him a break...rj
Norton

Social climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 07:55pm PT
Norton, do you know the difference between "lies" and "fake news"?

yes I do, Blu

but it seems you do not and are still confused about it

start by googling it and do some reading to help you out, good luck Blu
Happiegrrrl2

Trad climber
Feb 26, 2017 - 08:31pm PT
TGT also refers to "the Obamaphone." S does my own brother-in-law. This is a pretty good example of why we shouldn't just blindly accept news sources, because I am pretty sure they read/heard it "somewhere."

And ya know what? Then I searched THE NEW YORK TIMES - IT CAME UP!!!!!

Yes it certainly did. In the default search, which looks through "All since 1851" - it came up







Once. In 2015.
The F.C.C. Should Help the Poor Get Online

And Lifeline’s $1.7 billion annual spending will not grow. Some critics of Lifeline derisively refer to it as “Obamaphone,” even though it was created under President Reagan. While there have been cases of fraud —
7SacredPools

Trad climber
Ontario, Canada
Feb 26, 2017 - 08:56pm PT
Why the hate on for political threads?
So long as there's only one or two going at a time I don't think they interfere too much with the other topics.
I'm interested in what climbers think about stuff, even if I disagree with them.
Guess because we still have something in common.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:14pm PT
Ahh sh#t verizon just told me i used up all my data!
Dumbass
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Feb 26, 2017 - 09:18pm PT
99% of the links that pyro, cosmic, and tgt post are fake news.
nah000

climber
no/w/here
Feb 27, 2017 - 12:13am PT
^^^^

if you would've used "poor fund of knowledge" in there and i hadn't looked at the name, i would've assumed those lines were coming from a smoking duck... :)
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:26am PT
Crankster, I am still reviewing. The site you linked has a lot of soft sensationalism (just like the other side seem to be doing as well) and is pretty snarky, but the first several articles I read led me to learn this:

Press members who had been identified individually tried to crash an invitation-only press event at the White House and were turned away by the Press Secretary. A dramatic word-based kerfuffle apparently ensued. Some press members without invitations were denied admission. Other press members who had been invited were admitted. Then ones who were not admitted tried to reinterpret the actions of the Press Secretary as an attack on all press. That is not the case. But Trump had called the MSM the enemy of the people. That was his opinion, which upset many of those involved.

In denying entry to select individuals, did any executive branch people break any laws? Not that I could discover.
Did Trump break any laws, or simply exercise his social prerogative through his representative, the Press Secretary? Again, I could not discover that either of them broke any laws.
(The press, the site you sent me to being a prime example, appears especially offended and pouting at not getting to swing their weight, deliver editorialized questions, or simply make statements of their political positions, at the White House press conferences as they are used to doing.)
Did Trump shut down any media outlets? Not that I could discover.
Did the press members who were excluded examine their own actions? Not that I could discover.
Was any member of the press threatened? Was the press threatened? Not that I could discover.

As I interpret this, some press members were denied entry to an invitation-only press event. Other press members were invited. The ones not invited have blown this out of proportion and claimed that Trump is denying First Amendment Rights. Some individual people were excluded, but not the press as a whole. My understanding is that the Press Secretary has the right and power to determine which press representative attend these press events. My old press card would not get me admitted, I am sure.

I will explore further.
Thank you for the suggestion.
ff
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:35am PT
As I interpret this, some press members were denied entry to an invitation-only press event.

An "invitation only" press event is antithetical to the First Amendment. This is what needs to be focused on.

Curt
dirtbag

climber
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:37am PT
Sure, and trump is also free to never say a damned thing to the press ever. But, for the American people, that would not be desirable. Not is shutting out news sources that write stories which are critical of him. It's intimidating, sending a message to outlets that they'd better be good little sheep or else they get cut out from stories.

F*#k that. He clearly views the press as an enemy. If you want to find out what's going on you need a vibrant press.






feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:39am PT
It was my understanding that almost all government press events are in fact invitation only. The student news papers, the radical right or left, and the community newsletter reporter are not generally given invitations nor admitted.

You might want to review the protocols for press conferences. Failure to issue an invitation or grant general admission to any press conference in no way violates First Amendment Rights.

ff
dirtbag

climber
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:40am PT
Times and CNN were targeted because they wrote some very probing articles.


You're ignoring his repeated "enemy of the American people" rants he and Bannon have spewed.


feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:43am PT
But dirtbag, weren't many press representatives present at this conference? That is hardly the same as not speaking to the press. And doesn't Trump post on social media?
I doubt that any press will be intimidated by not being invited: I think most press people are able to find ways to express themselves and their opinions, slanted or not. I give you the linked site from Crankster as an example. I imagine they have a significant following.
ff
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:43am PT
It was my understanding that almost all government press events are in fact invitation only. The student news papers, the radical right or left, and the community newsletter reporter are not generally given invitations nor admitted.

You are being exceptionally disingenuous by trying to make this sound like it's the same thing. It is not.

Curt
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Sands Motel , Las Vegas
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:45am PT
ferfalae...Yes and the supreme court has ruled that Corporations are people...
dirtbag

climber
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:48am PT
But dirtbag, weren't many press representatives present at this conference? That is hardly the same as not speaking to the press. And doesn't Trump post on social media?
I doubt that any press will be intimidated by not being invited: I think most press people are able to find ways to express themselves and their opinions, slanted or not. I give you the linked site from Crankster as an example. I imagine they have a significant following.
ff

Is this a serious question?
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:52am PT
No, I am not ignoring those stupid and vicious statements: I mentioned them. Any statement (including this one) that tars everyone with the same brush is a stupid statement. There is nothing that all-inclusive. Trump was lashing out in his usual fashion, making sweeping statements without solid grounding, from his reactive emotional state. Both sides are doing this. It doesn't make either side right.

If I were inviting people to a press conference of mine (yes, I've held a few) I'd probably not invite the press representatives of the KKK or the far right, nor those of the far left. I'd try to invite the least biased and most accurate reporters I could find. If reporters had been disruptive, rude, or pontificating at a prior press conference, I might not invite them. If they were critical, editorializing rather than reporting, I might not invite them. If I considered them to be inimical in their reporting, I might not invite them.

ff
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:57am PT
Rotting Johnny, the SCOTUS also ruled that slavery was legal. that still did not make it moral or right.

What's your point?
ff
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:57am PT
...least biased and most accurate reporters I could find...

Good luck with that. Unfortunately the most accurate and least biased reporters are likely forced to choose other careers.
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:58am PT
Yes, dirtbag, those were serious and simple questions, requiring only a simple yes or no answer.

ff
WBraun

climber
Feb 27, 2017 - 07:21am PT
Unfortunately, the most accurate and least biased reporters are likely forced to choose other careers.

Some mysteriously disappear to suffer car accident, plane crash, suicide or cardiac although they were perfectly healthy.

ontheedgeandscaredtodeath

Social climber
SLO, Ca
Feb 27, 2017 - 09:18am PT
If you just read one major national newspaper (NYT / WSJ / etc) and add in one foreign source (BBC / Economist) you will be far more informed than the mouth breathers who spend their days watching "experts" yell at each other on TV or listening to bottom feeder radio hosts.
Wade Icey

Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
Feb 27, 2017 - 10:02am PT
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 27, 2017 - 10:48am PT
I guess Fruity was wrong
Even Trump's people won't call it Radical Islamic Terrorism

The Guardian reports:

A participant, paraphrasing McMaster, said: “He said he doesn’t want to call it radical Islamic terrorism because the terrorists are, quote, ‘un-Islamic’.”

McMaster, the participant said, indicated that the phrase castigates “an entire religion” and “he’s not on board”.

At the meeting, multiple sources said, McMaster discomfited White House staffers who view the terrorist threat in those religious terms and who were said to have exchanged awkward looks with each other.

A participant, paraphrasing McMaster, said: “He said he doesn’t want to call it radical Islamic terrorism because the terrorists are, quote, ‘un-Islamic’.”

McMaster, the participant said, indicated that the phrase castigates “an entire religion” and “he’s not on board”.

At the meeting, multiple sources said, McMaster discomfited White House staffers who view the terrorist threat in those religious terms and who were said to have exchanged awkward looks with each other.

According to fruity, we lost because we didn't use those exact words.
I say he's delusional, no American Leader should call it Radical Islamic Terrorism useless you want to be called out as WRONG.
We did not lose for being wrong.
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Feb 27, 2017 - 11:00am PT
Sure msm has biases and is controlled by big money.

It's pretty ridiculous that in this day and age where you have numerous media sources at your fingers with the Internet, where you can double check anything, that the right wing echo chamber is all up in arms about MSM bias. If you have any critical thinking skills you can analyze what you're reading and see the bias and fact check it, they want to act like all of us are too dumb to get it. But what's so funny is they are so full of easily proven lies they are the least trustworthy sources around.

Of course going back to what I said earlier the self deluded allow themselves to see what they need to see.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 27, 2017 - 11:02am PT
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 27, 2017 - 11:09am PT
He's delusional to think that it had some effect on the 2016 election

I don't care what you call it, but to say you have to call it those exact words is wrong

I like the words "Right Wing Extremist Terrorism"
so it includes all terrorism carried out by right wingers no matter what their religious may be.
TradEddie

Trad climber
Philadelphia, PA
Feb 27, 2017 - 01:04pm PT
I like the words "Right Wing Extremist Terrorism"

There's still three unnecessary words in there. Terrorism. We do however need to be much more selective about what and who we call terrorists. It's all too convenient to label all our enemies as simply terrorists.

Those Bowling Green "terrorists" were anything but. Any terrorist believing they had secured a stinger missile within the US would go straight to JFK/LAX and take out the first 747 they see. A thousand times more terror than shooting down a US helicopter over Iraqi soil.

TE
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 27, 2017 - 01:48pm PT
I find this site fairly level-handed. ff

Trump's Troublesome Tweet on the Debt
President Trump’s Saturday morning tweet on the national debt left many budget watchers scratching their heads about its dubious factoid and irrelevant comparison.

Here’s what Trump said: “The media has not reported that the National Debt in my first month went down by $12 billion vs a $200 billion increase in Obama first mo.”

The facts are accurate but meaningless. Trump correctly claims that the debt went down in his first month as president. There are, however, two problems with this claim. First, the time frame is totally arbitrary. The debt number can fluctuate widely on a day-to-day basis. For example, from January 10 to January 12 this year the debt fell by $22 billion. On the other hand, from January 13 to January 18 it rose by $21 billion.

As Keith Hennessey, former director of the National Economic Council under President George W. Bush, noted, if Trump had “ended his timeframe one day earlier this tweet would have been invalid and debt would have increased (by just $1 B) in ‘the first month.’ ”
...
We will have to wait many months, if not years, to see what effect Trump’s fiscal policies have on the debt. Budget trends take time to develop. They are not shown by one-month comparisons taken out of context. What we do know is that the Congressional Budget Office projects steadily rising deficits and debt over the next 10 years under current law.
...
In the meantime, it is unsettling that the president would think such a meaningless factoid is worthy of public attention. Credibility on the numbers is a valuable and fragile commodity.

http://www.concordcoalition.org/tabulation/trumps-troublesome-tweet-debt
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 27, 2017 - 02:03pm PT
The National debt will go up as Trump cuts taxes and spends like a mad man on the military, the wall, deporting, and his secret service detail of protecting his 100s of properties, Trump Tower, Mar Largo and his weekly golfing trips.

The GOP will try and bury it until we get the next Democrat in office, and then the National debt will be a crisis again.

Obama's first month was hit by the GOP bailing out the banks and the unfunded Iraq war that Bush kept off the books.
And none of Obama's budgets were ever implemented, it was the GOP's budget all 8 years and a series of continuing resolutions because the GOP could not get their austerity budget cuts through
ecdh

climber
the east
Feb 27, 2017 - 02:16pm PT
When the most important story in the press is the wrong announcement at an award ceremony and what some celebrities tweeted about it, the battle for media potency has been long lost.

Face it, the US has become what it confronts - a drunken monkey stung by a wasp.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 27, 2017 - 03:32pm PT
In denying entry to select individuals, did any executive branch people break any laws? Not that I could discover.
Did Trump break any laws, or simply exercise his social prerogative through his representative, the Press Secretary? Again, I could not discover that either of them broke any laws.
(The press, the site you sent me to being a prime example, appears especially offended and pouting at not getting to swing their weight, deliver editorialized questions, or simply make statements of their political positions, at the White House press conferences as they are used to doing.)
Did Trump shut down any media outlets? Not that I could discover.
Did the press members who were excluded examine their own actions? Not that I could discover.
Was any member of the press threatened? Was the press threatened? Not that I could discover.

As I interpret this, some press members were denied entry to an invitation-only press event. Other press members were invited. The ones not invited have blown this out of proportion and claimed that Trump is denying First Amendment Rights. Some individual people were excluded, but not the press as a whole. My understanding is that the Press Secretary has the right and power to determine which press representative attend these press events. My old press card would not get me admitted, I am sure.

I will explore further.
Thank you for the suggestion.
ff


That the ''simple, acknowledged principles'' embodied in the First Amendment have occasioned controversy without end both in the courts and out should alert one to the difficulties latent in such spare language.

Insofar as there is likely to have been a consensus, it was no doubt the common law view as expressed by Blackstone. ''The liberty of the press is indeed essential to the nature of a free state; but this consists in laying no previous restraints upon publications, - See more at: http://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment1/annotation06.html#1[/quote]
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 27, 2017 - 03:39pm PT
If I were inviting people to a press conference of mine (yes, I've held a few) I'd probably not invite the press representatives of the KKK or the far right, nor those of the far left. I'd try to invite the least biased and most accurate reporters I could find. If reporters had been disruptive, rude, or pontificating at a prior press conference, I might not invite them. If they were critical, editorializing rather than reporting, I might not invite them. If I considered them to be inimical in their reporting, I might not invite them.

Perhaps you have. However, I doubt that you held press conferences representing the Gov't of the US.

On your private property, you could allow who you wanted to hold an event. However, if it were a public space, you could not discriminate in that way.

This has to do with the difference between the inability of the gov't to "pick sides" and the private sector, which can.
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 27, 2017 - 04:28pm PT
Ken M wrote:
Perhaps you have. However, I doubt that you held press conferences representing the Gov't of the US.
On your private property, you could allow who you wanted to hold an event. However, if it were a public space, you could not discriminate in that way.
This has to do with the difference between the inability of the gov't to "pick sides" and the private sector, which can.

Yes, very good point. My press conferences, all but one, have been on private property. And no one was hanging on my every word, although I did get some interesting questions sometimes. My answers were not going to inform, deceive or even amuse and entertain an entire nation. Maybe a few archaeologists and anthropologists. That's about it.

Yours is a remarkably good point. But then the president is going to need a huge stadium, or live streaming, to fit in everyone who would love to be at a presidential press conference, eh? Not that there is any reason that should not happen, even if an individual is representing no more than his Neighborhood Watch newsletter. Since presently, press conferences are often held in the home of the First Family, I think there must be protocols which limit entry.

That is still a good point, generally and specifically.
Thank you.
ff
Splater

climber
Grey Matter
Feb 27, 2017 - 05:34pm PT
Bush Weighs In On Trump Presidency, Calling Press 'Indispensable To Democracy'

In a speech in Canada just weeks into the Obama presidency, Bush told his audience he wouldn't spend his time criticizing Obama, "and if he wants my help, he can pick up the phone and call me."

Which brings us to NBC's Today on Monday morning.
It was Bush's first interview since Donald Trump was sworn in as president.

"I consider the media to be indispensable to democracy. We need an independent media to hold people like me to account. Power can be very addictive. And it can be corrosive. And it's important for the media to call to account people who abuse their power, whether it be here or elsewhere."

Bush noted that he spent a lot of time trying to persuade Russian President Vladimir Putin to accept the notion of an independent press.

http://www.npr.org/2017/02/27/517547987/bush-weighs-in-on-trump-presidency-calling-press-indispensable-to-democracy

“It's kind of hard to tell others to have an independent free press when we're not willing to have one ourselves,” Bush said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/02/27/george-w-bush-critiques-trump-on-travel-ban-free-press/?utm_term=.33001f9a9f31
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 27, 2017 - 06:24pm PT
Yours is a remarkably good point. But then the president is going to need a huge stadium, or live streaming, to fit in everyone who would love to be at a presidential press conference, eh? Not that there is any reason that should not happen, even if an individual is representing no more than his Neighborhood Watch newsletter. Since presently, press conferences are often held in the home of the First Family, I think there must be protocols which limit entry.

Indeed.

This was addressed through "press pools" in which organizations were randomly assigned, and through vetting of organizations to assure that they were, actually, "mainstream media"--perhaps with requirements of publishing frequency, I'm not sure.

This site references some of the requirements. I had not known of the Secret Service background check, but it makes sense:

http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/06/07/can-the-white-house-revoke-a-reporters-credentials/

there apparently are about 2,000 currently accredited reporters
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Sands Motel , Las Vegas
Feb 27, 2017 - 08:06pm PT
It doesn't do much good to have a free press when half the voters are illiterate....More military spending and less funding for education...
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 27, 2017 - 08:16pm PT
So is Trump simply opening the invitations from the pool to toss in some lesser presses, beyond the usual suspects?

Thank you for the information on the protocols. Fascinating. I knew it could not be open to everyone, and with 2,000 credential-holders, I can see how one might not be invited to every event. (But a gracious person would have publicly posted a list of invitees far enough in advance for there to be no awkward moments. Or was there an advance notice, and some press members showed up anyway? What is the back story? Anyone know?)

Not that I think for a moment that Trump is not capable of being as snarky as he wants to be.

ff
WBraun

climber
Feb 27, 2017 - 08:21pm PT
Trump is the Kazarian mob's puppet who are trying hard as hell to take over the world ......

(evil fukers, really really evil) Most mobsters will not kill children, but these fukers do
monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 27, 2017 - 08:28pm PT
Yeah, lets spend more on the military and cut education and the environment.

Military spending
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 27, 2017 - 08:42pm PT
Source, monolith?
Not questioning your research, but it always builds credibility to cite sources, especially for graphics. And it gives readers a place to check for more information. :)
Thank you.
ff
Yury

Mountain climber
T.O.
Feb 27, 2017 - 08:47pm PT
rottingjohnny

It doesn't do much good to have a free press when half the voters are illiterate...
What is that mythical free independent press that was mentioned quite a few times in this discussion?
It doesn't exist in any established country.

For example in Russia it was present only around year 1917 and around year 1990 during Russian communist and capitalist revolutions.
Now press in Russia is well controlled. :(

Similarly in the US we do not have free independent press. :(
It's controlled by:
 big money
 liberals (with Fox being the only survivor)
 US states department through its daily foreign policy briefings
monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 27, 2017 - 08:47pm PT
Do your own research, FF. You are the only one who can convince yourself. Any source I give you will be called fake news.
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 27, 2017 - 08:48pm PT
No worries. USA outspends our 6-7 nearest competitors COMBINED!!

But just remember, we're so depleted and weak...

Don't look away, just remember that we've always been at war with Oceania.

Don't read any Kafka. Don't read any Ginsberg. Dirty fags and immigrants. White bread only please. Stare into the Spicer machine.
monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 27, 2017 - 08:57pm PT
Here is the NY Times version on military spending. Its a few years old so I'm sure it will be discounted.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/03/11/us/politics/cutting-the-worlds-most-expensive-military.html?_r=0

BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Feb 27, 2017 - 09:05pm PT
^^^ that was from 2013 mono, wtf?

Say sumpton realavent.
monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 27, 2017 - 09:06pm PT
Haha, I told you it was a few years old and would be discounted. So what Blueblocr. Has there been a dramatic change?

We easily outspend the sum of the other top 10 countries.
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 27, 2017 - 09:11pm PT
"Crumbling military"? ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!

Fixed it for you.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Sands Motel , Las Vegas
Feb 27, 2017 - 09:20pm PT
What good is the worlds biggest military when a quarter of its' population live below the poverty line and most of its' citizens struggle to pay for health care and a college education...Who is this military protecting and couldn't this excess be spent on making Americans' lives better...? Huh..?
monolith

climber
state of being
Feb 27, 2017 - 09:21pm PT
Current US military spending is 773 Billion for all departments related to protecting from out of country threats.

All broken out below, so nitpick away:

https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-military-budget-components-challenges-growth-3306320
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 27, 2017 - 10:02pm PT
Fake news.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 27, 2017 - 10:06pm PT






oh. wrong thread. but yeah Jody, totally agree. there do exist enemies of the people. whatever shall we do with them?
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Feb 27, 2017 - 10:19pm PT
Very interesting story from The Guardian :

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/feb/26/robert-mercer-breitbart-war-on-media-steve-bannon-donald-trump-nigel-farage
Robert Mercer: the big data billionaire waging war on mainstream media - With links to Donald Trump, Steve Bannon and Nigel Farage, the rightwing US computer scientist is at the heart of a multimillion-dollar propaganda network
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Feb 27, 2017 - 10:30pm PT
Who is this military protecting and couldn't this excess be spent on making Americans' lives better...? Huh..?

I'm ALL for a radical reduction in military spending, along with withdrawing our forces (and black-op "influences") from most of the world!

But in typical lib-think, you treat that money as though it's the government's. It's NOT. That is mostly money that the government never should have had in the first place.

Let me fix your question: "Why couldn't this excess be left in the pockets of the Americans from whom it was originally stolen, letting them make their lives better?"

Decent, responsible people don't NEED (nor WANT) government telling them how their lives should be better. SS is a classic example of government telling us how to retire (namely, in poverty, if THAT's the retirement plan). Leave the money in American's pockets where it belongs, and then you won't have to talk about "excess," and the debates about stealing from some to "give" to others will go away.

The government was never supposed to be "Robin Hood" writ large, with the industrial-military complex being one of the major recipients of OUR largess!
Fat Dad

Trad climber
Los Angeles, CA
Feb 27, 2017 - 10:31pm PT
Jody, still doesn't get it. You have the president of the world's greatest democracy attacking a right embedded in the Constitution (accurately portraying his many false statements). Rather than man up and play it straight, he attacks the messenger as the 'real' problem. You don't deserve the democracy you enjoy. You'd love the not so former Soviet Union, where the state and media are indistinguishable.
Degaine

climber
Feb 28, 2017 - 12:06am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]

Don't worry, her segment's in English.
jaaan

Trad climber
Chamonix, France
Feb 28, 2017 - 12:37am PT
Oh well played, Degaine. Excellent!
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Feb 28, 2017 - 01:05am PT
Plus 10 fatdad.

They're embracing the evil.

In Germany. There was the blessings of millions. The first concentration camps were set up in 1933. The good ol' USA didn't step in to save the world til EIGHT YEARS LATER!! We'll come to our senses again.
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Feb 28, 2017 - 05:53am PT
The US has been the Great Satan for generations now. We having been bombing and murdering nations all around the globe for profit and sport.

It didn't begin with the Orange Clown nor will it end there. The puppet in chief is just that, all sound and fury signifying nothing.

The trajectory of empires is all the the same, only the timelines differ.

crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 28, 2017 - 06:12am PT
I'm ALL for a radical reduction in military spending, along with withdrawing our forces (and black-op "influences") from most of the world!

Priceless. This from the guy who helped elect a man who has to be the most totally uninformed person to ever step into the White House ... and that includes all the tourists.

You wanted a "radical reduction" and instead you're looking at a 10% increase...gee, how'd that happen? Who would have thought "health care could be so complicated"? Dang.
Yury

Mountain climber
T.O.
Feb 28, 2017 - 06:20am PT
fear

The US has been the Great Satan for generations now. We having been bombing and murdering nations all around the globe for profit and sport.
fear, you are too young and naive.
It's a de facto law of international releations, that a country with stronger military can attack a weeker country with impunity.

Do you prefer China, USSR or Germany/Japan playing the role of a master of the world?
I doubt very much that this world would be better.
I prefer the current world with US being the Great Satan.

The world where all countries live in peace without starting wars does not exist.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 28, 2017 - 06:25am PT
Yep, too divisive to discuss.

As I've stated before, you can't discuss issues rationally with people who flock to "news" sources such as Breitbart, Faux News, and other right wing propaganda. Mentally, they're lost causes. You have to defeat them in the short term, and teach kids critical thinking skills in the long term. It's a crisis, but we're not going to solve it in four years.
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 28, 2017 - 06:35am PT
Monolith, you are entirely wrong in your a*#umptions concerning my response. I heartily agree that the US should bring home all the overseas troops, protect our own borders, vet entrants to avoid sabotage, and lower our military budget by more than half. We have been sold a bill of goods when they tell us that we need this "strong military" to "protect our country and our freedom" when we are losing our freedoms daily in the name of "security."

I am not saying we should roll over and play dead in the geopolitical game, but we have no business continuing our destabilization of other nations based on satisfying the greed of some gang of puppet masters who are still driven by insatiable greed and power hunger. Look around the globe at the present crop of leaders: any of them you would trust with power? No, me neither.

Here is a link to the chart you posted, or a similar one:
http://www.pgpf.org/chart-archive/0053_defense-comparison

Our military spending is ridiculous. One of the things I find reprehensible about Trump is his obsession with the further militarization of this nation. Our Veteran's hospitals are overwhelmed with returning military in need of care, and yet are failing badly in meeting the needs of these people. And most of the military actions are against people who have never, ever harmed a US citizen. Same old story: conquer, traumatize, and colonize. Look at what has happened to Viet Nam.

But I am not in favor of a welfare state either. Government schooling continues to fail, because the basic premise is flawed: it is based on an industrial model of one size fits all, and on processing individual minds and spirits through a uniform process designed to subjugate and conform children into a model of obedient little factory workers. Teaching innocent children that their life will be about responding to bells, needing permission to take care of bodily functions, get a drink of water, or move from their tiny cell of a desk (work station). How sick is that? Not a sick as terrorizing other children and adults in other places, but still, pretty sick.

I'd rather see the tax money returned to those from whom it was stolen, but barring that, shrink the military and pay off the national debt, and return the nation to the Constitutionality of the Bill of Rights. Simply enforcing the Bill of Rights against the politicians would remarkably restore order and fairness to this nation.

Furthermore, we already have a very controlled press: government licensure and the FCC made sure of that. But then along came the internet, and as the priests lost control when the printing press made information available in Europe, the politicians are losing control as the internet makes information available globally. I am not sure a lot people grasp the impact of the internet on communication. The Reformation was catalyzed by gunpowder, the printing press, and the Protestant schism from Catholicism. What, beyond the internet, is driving the Reformation we see around us?

Okay, now you have a lot more about which to make assumptions about my bias. Have fun. :) Silly person. :)
ff
feralfae

Boulder climber
in the midst of a metaphysical mystery
Feb 28, 2017 - 07:06am PT
Jody, rather than simply criticize the government-vetted press, Trump did a logical tactic and took his communications directly to the people via the internet. Good for him on that score. The press is pouting about its loss of power to sway public opinion, having already lost the power to control the news. It has actually already lost the power to sway public opinion, but that message has not yet found its way into the awareness of most government-licensed press sources. This is not the way the game has been played in days of yore, after all. The rules have changed.

This is an interesting thread, and I have been informed, amused, educated, and occasionally surprised at the posts here. But having made enough inane remarks myself, I think I will retire from the field now and see how the game of words and ideas evolves.

Thank you all for indulging my nattering.
feralfae
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 28, 2017 - 07:15am PT
Jody, you think every member of the media get together on a morning conference call to decide what to report???? Apply some common sense, man.
WBraun

climber
Feb 28, 2017 - 07:36am PT
Or ...

How to spin the news to fit into the loons head .....

(since the reporter is a loon also)
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Feb 28, 2017 - 07:45am PT
Priceless. This from the guy who helped elect a man who has to be the most totally uninformed person to ever step into the White House ... and that includes all the tourists.


That's pretty funny, Crankloon.



Crankster, they don't have to. It is ingrained in them.

"Report" is the wrong term. Deciding what "news to create" would be more accurate.

And of course you are including reporters from fox, and Breitbart, correct?

crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 28, 2017 - 08:12am PT

(since the reporter is a loon also)

This could go in the dictionary under the definition "ignorance". Along with about 99% of the nonsense coming from Area 51.
WBraun

climber
Feb 28, 2017 - 08:15am PT
LOL

We knew you'd come running like the fool you've always been.

It proves you believe everything you read and also hyper insecure .....
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 28, 2017 - 08:21am PT
I don't get my news from outer space. I live and breathe on Earth.

What sort of space dust are you interpreting now? Spin the salad spinner and enlighten us.
rbord

Boulder climber
atlanta
Feb 28, 2017 - 08:22am PT
The pussy grabber in chief, on leaks in his own administration, is now saying Obama did it.

Because, you know, he wasn't even born in this country.

Sure Trump might have said he changed his mind about his birther bullsh#t, but he said it with a wink and a nod - that was just locker room talk. The illuminati understand what he really meant - they know the true truth.

I blame Obama. Perfect. The Bears were who we thought they were.
Messages 1 - 263 of total 263 in this topic
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta