Yosemite going the way of Disneyland?

Yosemite going the way of Disneyland?

WASHINGTON -- Interior Secretary Manuel Lujan announced Wednesday he had succeeded
in forcing Japan's Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. to sell its tourist facilities in Yosemite National
Park to a non-profit group.
The $49.5 million sale will be completed in 1993, at which time the non-profit group, the National
Park Foundation, will donate its property to the National Park Service. The service will then
negotiate contract terms with a new concession operator.

The deal will 'ensure successful future management and operations of one of this country's
magnificent wonders,' Lujan told the House Interior Subcommittee on National Parks and Public
Lands.'

But the arrangement also requires domestic ownership of the concession business at Yosemite, the
principal reason Lujan raised objections to Matsushita's $6.6 billlion acquisition of MCA Inc. last
week. The company's subsidiaries include Universal Studios and MCA Records.

Lujan repeatedly said during the hearing and later at a news conference that he wished to 'tone
down the rhetoric,' though he denied that he had engaged in 'Japan bashing.'
'Certainly not,' he said when asked whether he led a crusade against Japan. 'There was not any
Japan bashing.'
The complex deal means that MCA will sell the Yosemite Park & Curry Co., which runs hotels,
restaurants, groceries and a gas station inside the central Sierra Nevada park. Included are the
Ahwahnee Hotel, Yosemite Lodge and the historic tent cabins.
Robert Hadl, vice president and general counsel of MCA Inc., said Wednesday, 'The agreement
which was reached (Tuesday) ensures that the concession at Yosemite Park will continue to be run
and managed by Americans.'
The maker of Panasonic, Technics and other brand-name electronics had been under heavy
pressure from the Interior Department to let go of MCA's Yosemite concessions since the takeover.
Before the deal was completed, Lujan asked MCA to donate the concessions company to the U.S.
Park Service or sell it for less than its estimated value to the National Park Foundation, created by
Congress to receive private gifts to the National Park System.

MCA agreed that profits from one of American's most scenic treasures should not go overseas, but
refused to donate Yosemite and Curry, offering instead to sell it to an American company within a
year, putting the pre-sale profits into an escrow account.

Talks on that possible deal broke down shortly before the takeover was completed.
Under the deal completed Wednesday, MCA will retain the profits -- estimated at up to $15 million a
year -- until the transfer in 1993.

Yosemite, with its massive granite formations and spectacular waterfalls and meadows, has become
one of the most visited of the national parks.

Yosemite going the way of Disneyland?

Not to mention The Crack of Doom, which got us into this fine mess

Is there an uncrowded "off season" anymore?

The only thing that sets them apart nowadays is that at one place the scenery is man made.

I think you are far too impressed with Disneyland

If Disney were running the show, it could. Usage would triple, but it wouldn't be a strain.

Last year, Yellowstone hit more than 4 million visits for the first time in history. It is poised to significantly surpass those numbers in 2016, the centennial year of the National Park Service. But behind all those cars and tour buses in the land of lodgepole pine looms a fundamental question: Is such soaring popularity good or bad for Yellowstone – and, more broadly, for the national park system as a whole? Can America’s outdoor crown jewels survive unmarred for another 100 years?

Can America’s outdoor crown jewels survive unmarred for another 100 years?

. . . . in 1929 Dr. Donald Tressider of the Yosemite Park & Curry Company proposed a cable car system to convey visitors from the Valley up to Tenaya Lake. An engineer from the Adolph Bleichert Company of Austria made a study of the route, and suggested that two cable systems would be required to span the long distance and two steep grades involved. Another cableway was proposed for Glacier Point. The Yosemite National Park Board of Expert Advisors seriously considered these proposals, finding some merit in that the cableways would alleviate some congestion on the Tioga Road. But in the end the proposals were rejected on account of the inescapable high visibility of the system and a fear that visitors would find trams an unnatural attraction, rather than a means of transportation. . ..