Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1221 - 1240 of total 10774 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Nov 5, 2015 - 11:24am PT
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.

Nov 5, 2015 - 11:20am PT
Ken, again, in his first year in office, he had a filibuster-proof majority of the Senate and a majority in the house

WRONG
it was 24 working days
as I told you 1000 times before

John's statement is still true.
Norton

Social climber
Nov 5, 2015 - 11:28am PT
Ken and John,

truth, facts do not matter

what matters is never, ever, admitting you are wrong

two plus two IS five

is that a difference of opinion?

yes I suppose so

John M

climber
Nov 5, 2015 - 11:28am PT
I would say Dirtbag nails it. Not that this means I believe Obama is some great negotiator. I don't. but he is better because he got over his illusion that the repubs would work with him.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Nov 5, 2015 - 12:02pm PT
For the first few years, when he was under the delusion that the republicans were at least somewhat reasonable, the president had an annoying habit of preemptively offering them what he thought they might want, only to be told FU in the end.

Riiiight.

He stiffed the Republicans on 2006 Stimulus Package.

Obamacare was somewhat bipartisan, in committee. But then the Dems added the individual mandate, which was a deal breaker with the Republicans.

He set the tone early.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Nov 5, 2015 - 12:14pm PT
The only one I've seen, namely the Iranian nuclear arms treaty, was a perfect example of a terrible outcome. We gave up something and received nothing. Neville Chamberlain did no worse in Munich.

What BS.

The whole rationale for the sanctions--------FORCE them to the negotiating table.

When that happened, the Repubs went loony! NO WAY! WERE GIVNG IN!
BEFORE they saw the agreement, they lambasted it as a terrible agreement.
BEFORE.
It didn't matter what the agreement said, it was Obama's agreement, therefore it could not be anything but terrible.

We got NOTHING???? How about we got a nuclear-weapon free Iran for at least 15 years.
WHAT THE F*** were you looking to get, John????

What did you want to negotiate FOR??

I won't say that John believes this (because I don't know), but I think the Repug position is to use the sanctions as an act of VENGENCE for throwing us out and having the uppityness to throw out the Shah. When we applied the sanctions, nukes were not the issue.

To see how this plays out, see CUBA. No nukes in sight. All we are doing is punishing the Cubans for choosing a different gov't style than the one we like.

Gosh, we sure got over Viet Nam.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Nov 5, 2015 - 12:18pm PT
Obamacare was somewhat bipartisan, in committee. But then the Dems added the individual mandate, which was a deal breaker with the Republicans.

Nope. It was part of the original plan, as created by Republicans. If you don't think so, go to Mass, where they enacted it 8 years before----including the individual mandate, as originally laid out by the Heritage Foundation, and adopted by Romney.

The Repubs attempted to scuttle the whole thing, as they understood the possibility of it getting passed, but the Dems getting credit (just as happened). So at that point, they tried to change it into something that would not work.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Nov 5, 2015 - 06:03pm PT
Nope. It was part of the original plan, as created by Republicans. If you don't think so, go to Mass, where they enacted it 8 years before----including the individual mandate, as originally laid out by the Heritage Foundation, and adopted by Romney.

I guess I should've clarified I was referring to the Republican members of the United States Senate.

Kind of thought it obvious.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Nov 5, 2015 - 06:17pm PT
We gave up something and received nothing

False. You are trying to argue that doing nothing (the Republican plan) would have a positive outcome. Our hands are not tied, we bought time and the outcome is still very much open. You are jumping to conclusions.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Nov 6, 2015 - 10:06am PT
Where do Republicans get that special talent for turning gold to dross? They score an electoral “massacre” (the Economist) in 2014 and, a year later, what do they have to show for it other than another threat to shut down the government? Hillary Clinton is caught in e-mail flagrante and Benghazi mendacity and yet, with one Kevin McCarthy gaffe and a singularly ineffective 11-hour Benghazi hearing, Republicans render her sanitized.

And now their latest feat. They win a stunning victory over their perennial nemesis, the mainstream media — a slam-dunk rim-rattling exposure of the media bias they have been complaining about for a half-century — and within a week they so overplayed their hand as to dissipate whatever sympathetic advantage they gained.

The CNBC debate was a gift for the GOP, so unadorned a demonstration of liberal condescension, hostility and arrogance that the rest of the media — their ideological cover exposed — were forced to denounce and ridicule their ham-handed colleagues. What happened then? Instead of quitting while they were ahead, the Republicans plunged into a week of meetings and statements, whining and complaining, bouncing around a series of demands, including control of the kind of questions that may or may not be asked at future debates.

Who’s the genius who thought up that one? First, it instantly allowed the liberal media to turn the tables and play defenders of journalistic independence against GOP bullies.

Second, it made the Republicans look small. To paraphrase Chris Christie’s “fantasy football” moment, the economy is in the tank, Russia is on the move, the Islamic State is on the attack — and the candidates are debating the proper room temperature for a debate forum?


Republican presidential candidates sparred over experience, took jabs at their Democratic opponents and even shared a few laughs during CNBC's main debate in Boulder, Colo., on Oct. 28. (Sarah Parnass/The Washington Post)

Third, this continues the season-long GOP diversion from what should be its real target — the wreckage wrought by seven years of Barack Obama. The greatest irony of this campaign is that Clinton and Bernie Sanders are the ones making the case that the economy is stagnant, inequality growing and the middle class falling increasingly behind. That’s a devastating indictment of Democratic governance, exactly the case Republicans should have been making all year. Instead, they’ve wasted months trading schoolboy taunts and ad hominems.

Now another distraction: debate structure. The party is demanding there be no repetition of the CNBC debate. Why, for God’s sake? That debate was the best thing to happen to the GOP since Michael Dukakis.

Won’t someone tell the Republicans that they won? Let it go. Who cares who’s on the next debate panel? Don’t they realize that fear of ridicule alone will temper the instincts of whatever liberal questioners are chosen?

John Harwood’s obnoxiousness and Becky Quick’s incompetence earned most of the opprobrium heaped on the moderators’ performance. But it was Carl Quintanilla who demonstrated just how unmoored liberal delusions about conservatives have become. He asked Ben Carson how, as an opponent of same-sex marriage, he could remain on the board of a company that is known for its generous treatment of gay employees. Quintanilla seemed genuinely unable to fathom that one can oppose the most radical change in the structure of marriage in human history — as Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama all did just a few years ago — without wanting to see gay people persecuted and denied decent treatment by their employers.

CNBC produced the best night of the entire campaign season for the GOP. And yet some Republicans were determined to turn it into another theater of their civil war against the GOP “establishment.” This time the target was Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus. As if Priebus is responsible for Harwood.

Good grief. Priebus’ job, the party’s job, is to control the number of debates and set the calendar. Its doing so in 2015-16 constitutes a significant achievement, considering the damage done to the GOP in 2011-2012 by its 20 freelance debates. That endless, vicious intramural fight — featuring Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich savaging Mitt Romney’s “vulture capitalism” — laid the premise for Obama’s negative and winning campaign.

Ted Cruz has suggested that Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Mark Levin moderate Republican debates. Good idea, wrong target. How about this arrangement? Limbaugh & Co. should moderate the Democratic debates. What a splendid blood-soaked spectacle that would be.

As for the GOP? Bring on the liberals. The Republicans should demand the return of Harwood, Quick and Quintanilla, until the end of time.

Read more from Charles Krauthammer’s archive, follow him on Twitter or subscribe to his updates on Facebook.



EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Nov 6, 2015 - 10:14am PT
It's time to stick a fork in Dr. Carson's campaign.

dirtbag

climber
Nov 6, 2015 - 10:18am PT
Yep. It's looking like he made up much of his life story, including--this just in--his admission to West Point.

A number of evangelicals belonging to the Hillary-Is-a-Damned-Liar crowd support Carson. Now what? Lol.
John M

climber
Nov 6, 2015 - 10:18am PT
He is getting pretty weird. I wonder if he has always been like this.



Man.. the people in power are just getting stranger and stranger. I wonder whats next.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Nov 6, 2015 - 10:22am PT
John posted

Ken, again, in his first year in office, he had a filibuster-proof majority of the Senate and a majority in the house. All he has to show for it is the increasingly-unpopular Obamacare and the worse-than-useless Dodd-Frank. Show me an ability to negotiate succesfully with opponents. Despite your pro-Obama propaganda listings, I await a genuine negltiated accomplishment.

You guys are gettin' trooooooooolled.
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Nov 6, 2015 - 10:43am PT
Quote Man.. the people in power are just getting stranger and stranger. I wonder whats next.Here

These people only have power if you let them. There has to be a consensus; elections are one way. Obvious I know, but the whole point to to NOT let people like Ben Carson have the power. In a way, I am thankful the election cycle is as long as it is now. Gives people more time to show their true selves.
John M

climber
Nov 6, 2015 - 10:47am PT
I realize that.. Its just weird to me how we keep letting these nut jobs in. Plus I believe that there is behind the scenes power that controls who gets heard, so its not just up to the people. Ben Carson was put forward to counter Obama, even though he can't run again. Plus to help make the Repubs look more diverse.

Then he pretends to be more black then Obama by saying I was a bad boy when I was young.. then it turns out he wasn't.. And now this.
dirtbag

climber
Nov 6, 2015 - 10:52am PT
The opening sentence on the West Point story in slate.com is hilarious:

The good news for Ben Carson is that there’s finally some breaking news to distract the media’s focus away from his peculiar theories about the pyramids of Giza and the damaging allegations that he didn’t try to murder a child. The bad news is that it’s only because the media has dug up a separate, seriously damaging fabrication from Carson’s past: that he was neither accepted nor offered a scholarship to West Point, as he’s claimed.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Nov 6, 2015 - 11:26am PT
I realize that.. Its just weird to me how we keep letting these nut jobs in. Plus I believe that there is behind the scenes power that controls who gets heard, so its not just up to the people. Ben Carson was put forward to counter Obama, even though he can't run again. Plus to help make the Repubs look more diverse.

I agree, at least somewhat. The press does what it always has done in the U.S. - entertain. I could make a plausible argument that Hearst was responsible for starting the Spanish-American War to increase newspaper sales. The current reporting, largely devoid of serious policy-implicating discussion, is just more of the same.

At least they got enough bad news out of Carson before any of the primaries. While I generally like his policy pronouncements, I'm glad the bad news came out now, not later. I and others could have made a terrible mistake. So on this, for once, kudos to the press.

John
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Nov 6, 2015 - 12:52pm PT
John, I guess it is good that you understand the difference between "pronouncements" and "plans".

Carson has grand pronouncements, with no plans of how to possibly accomplish them.

Pronouncement: I believe in an America in which NO ONE pays taxes!
Plan: "DUH???" I have to do that, TOO??


You guys better get ready for Trump, because Carson just destroyed himself with the "Stolen Valor" military business. The other stuff, just an interesting quirk.

But isn't it disturbing that the FRONT RUNNER for the GOP faked his military credentials (such as they were)

And you can bet this did not come from the Dems, it came from the Repubs. (The media only reported it)
Norton

Social climber
Nov 6, 2015 - 01:06pm PT

well

iis it now time to finally call Gentle Ben a "liar"

multiple statements proven either flat unverifiable or factually wrong = lies

or does he get a pass because he is a gentle and gifted surgeon?

but isn't everyone a "liar"?

who can say they never ever said something they knew was not true?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Nov 16, 2015 - 08:05am PT
Remember, I was the one who said attack the oil (ISIS source of wealth) a long time ago. Everyone scoffed, now they're attacking the oil.

Donald Trump
Messages 1221 - 1240 of total 10774 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta