Ban Drones

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 590 of total 590 in this topic
TheMaster

climber
Topic Author's Original Post - Jul 18, 2015 - 02:14pm PT
Normally, I am against the banning of anything...but this is getting stupid. Again, just yesterday, firefighting aircraft were grounded because of drones. The Cajon Pass fire yesterday burned cars and homes, and I wonder if that loss of property is due, in part, to the delay in firefighting aircraft. This is three times in less than two weeks that drones have interfered in a fire emergency...that I know of.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 18, 2015 - 03:02pm PT
Summary execution.
Braunini

Big Wall climber
cupertino
Jul 18, 2015 - 03:34pm PT
Ban drones

Another option:

[Click to View YouTube Video]
SteveW

Trad climber
The state of confusion
Jul 18, 2015 - 04:11pm PT

U better start liken' those, Cosmic.
They're how we all get fed!
overwatch

climber
Jul 18, 2015 - 04:12pm PT
must be a seal they are the only tier 1 unit still using a high ready. Poor weapon handling

Edit:
I was being sarcastic about the seal part
mouse from merced

Trad climber
The finger of fate, my friends, is fickle.
Jul 18, 2015 - 04:13pm PT
Baunini, that dude is tits on a boar, nawmean?

You need FIRE POWER and a quick hit, dude.[Click to View YouTube Video]

Not exactly a trophy drone, but a solid take-down.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Jul 18, 2015 - 04:32pm PT
A few days ago I was enjoying the view from my balcony when a drone helicopter came flying around in front of my house. I live in a tall house located high on a hill, about as much privacy and space as we could afford within reasonable work commuting distance of a dense part of Los Angeles. The windows and sliding glass door are designed to maximize my expansive view without concern for line of site from neighbors.

The damn drone was just hovering there about 30-40 feet from me, destroying my peace. I paid big bucks for my view, not so some cheapskate living in the flatlands below me can mess it up and invade my privacy.

It creeped me out and made me immediately want to get involved in local politics to ban them. Maybe I should figure out a net and slingshot system to make it financially undesirable for drone operators to buzz me. I don't want to use firearms or even a slingshot with potatoes because it could hurt someone else who lives down the hill from me.



Edit: Braunini, that clip is wacky. Skeet shooting is harder and a lot cheaper. Well, drone operators trying to randomize motions to mess up your tracking would make it harder. But still a heck of a lot more expensive than a little big of clay.
Braunini

Big Wall climber
cupertino
Jul 18, 2015 - 04:41pm PT

Jul 18, 2015 - 04:12pm PT
must be a seal they are the only tier 1 unit still using a high ready. Poor weapon handling

Zero chance that dude was ever a tier anything.
doughnutnational

Gym climber
its nice here in the spring
Jul 18, 2015 - 05:28pm PT
Try this:
http://www.qrz.ru/schemes/contribute/security/jammers/drone-jammer.pdf
Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Jul 18, 2015 - 05:50pm PT
The schematic is not much use without a silkscreen for the PCB

This might be easier

http://jammers4u.com/ct-1088-e-portable-8-bands-jammer-gsm-2g-3g-4g-gps-l1-lojack-wifi-2.4ghz.-range-up-to-20m
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jul 18, 2015 - 05:59pm PT
NutAgain...#9 birdshot in a 12GA won't go very far past your intended target. Are your downhill neighbors at least 100 yards away?

At 30-40 ft #4 shot and a Wrist Rocket should be effective silent and not harm the neighbors or summon Adam 12.

Then here's an answer.

[Click to View YouTube Video]

squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 08:14am PT
it's pretty ironic that this happened during the Drone Nationals, lol..

Banning drones in the US when we are in the middle of a drone revolution would be like chopping your own head off...I could talk about it for hours...but I have media to deal with..

You see I was the flight director for the 1st national drone races held in Sacramento all last week where the best pilots in the world came to show off. the dust has yet to settle, but believe me, the stupid fire fighting story is nothing..it's futile sensationalist crap for a fear mongering media and pathetically ignorant audience..just wait..

Enjoy...[Click to View YouTube Video]
CA.Timothy

climber
California
Jul 19, 2015 - 08:23am PT
and pathetically ignorant audience..just wait..


so I dont want a drone buzzing around my home, yard, designated wilderness trail, or the scene were ems personnel are responding. All the sudden I am pathetically ignorant?

in the middle of a drone revolution

is skynet online?
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 19, 2015 - 08:24am PT
Flying a drone above a wildfire could someday cost you
Jesse Marx, The Desert Sun 7:34 a.m. PDT July 14, 2015

http://www.desertsun.com/story/news/2015/07/13/drones-regulations-wildfires/30108929/

As flames swallowed 31,000 acres in San Bernardino National Forest late last month, a drone was spotted above a ridgeline.

The unmanned aircraft flew between two emergency planes that were dropping fire retardant. It forced flights to be grounded for several hours to prevent a mid-air collision, delaying containment efforts.


Last week, two California lawmakers filed legislation to keep drones from interfering with firefighting efforts. Although the bill wasn’t ready for public inspection on Monday, it’s clear that state Assembly member Mike Gatto, a Democrat from Glendale, and Sen. Ted Gaines, a Republican from El Dorado, mean business.

The legislation, if approved, would extend an existing law that prohibits interference with fire-fighting efforts, but increase the maximum fine when a drone is involved from $1,000 to $5000, with the possibility of six months in jail. The range of penalties would depend on whether the interference was considered accidental or incidental.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Jul 19, 2015 - 08:27am PT

This is my drone
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 19, 2015 - 08:28am PT
Don't feel too badly, pyro...after all, it's not the size, but what you do with it...
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 08:53am PT
so I dont want a drone buzzing around my home, yard, designated wilderness trail, or the scene were ems personnel are responding. All the sudden I am pathetically ignorant?

Yes you are, because it's not the drone you are actually complaining about, it's actually just a common problem called ignorant and or stupid people...they just happen to have access to drones now. There's tons of existing laws that are suppose to prevent all of that. The drone is just a tool, like a hammer or a rope, what people do with it is a concern though, right? And I will agree with you...but it's not the drone's fault, it's people and as long as you keep blaming drones, you will also appear ignorant...

Every time there's a fire a no fly notice goes out, people are flying drones in a no fly zone. Has it been enforced? There's existing laws here not being enforced right? So why do we need new laws? Why much we blame an inanimate object, when it's actually a problem with our fellow man?
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 08:55am PT
Do we ban hammers cus someone killed someone with one once?
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 19, 2015 - 08:58am PT
How about gunz?
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 09:01am PT
I was trying to avoid that example, but you get the idea..

is it already illegal for me to put a gopro on a stick and over your fence to watch you naked? right?

I guess we gotta ban sticks too...
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Jul 19, 2015 - 10:36am PT
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Jul 19, 2015 - 10:38am PT
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 10:59am PT
We're going to add tons of new laws about drones, but sadly not until after drones are used to kill lots of people.

Stupid technology to put in the hands of bobbyist morons and potential terrorists. Not to mention creppy peepers.

We're gonna get those drones. Mark my words.

DMT

You sound like Salathe in his later years...

Mark my words...

you are dead wrong...

You sound exactly like the people who tried to ban automobiles because they would kill everyone and take over the roads and scare all the horses...that's just how wrong you are, just saying..own it...over and over, I do not mind, because history will show you. I don't even expect you to eat crow, I'll let you hang your head some day and walk away quietly, as an example...

welcome to the drone revolution...

I just spent the last 5 days with the best drone pilots in the world, a reoccurring question I got was "why is America so far behind?"

All I need to do now, is point to people like you, comments and opinions like this...you make the explanation to the rest of the world so damn easy..our governance is even further behind the curve...
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 11:01am PT


pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Jul 19, 2015 - 11:05am PT
Don't feel too badly, pyro...after all, it's not the size, but what you do with it...

Apagoo try to get off with this pic!

Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jul 19, 2015 - 11:08am PT
"We're gonna get those drones. Mark my words.

DMT"




What a comedian...LOL!
climbski2

Mountain climber
Anchorage AK, Reno NV
Jul 19, 2015 - 11:10am PT
The best thing about drones is... no more butt shots!
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 11:18am PT
I'm gonna miss the butt shots...
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jul 19, 2015 - 11:19am PT
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 11:25am PT
We had a similar event here in Colorado near Evergreen the other day. UAV involved on scene of a fire. But in this case the operator was working with the fire department to spot a lightening strike fire. Utilizing the first person view from the vehicle they flew in and did a recon on the fire to assess the situation. The bird got out and the FD went in with added information and put the little blaze out.

As far as the Cajon story goes it appears to be a bit sensationalized (gee... not the media!). I'll be curious to see what the real story ends up being (probably somewhere in the middle)

squishy is spot on - banning them would be like cutting your head off. the economic implications ($8B by 2018) are far to great for some draconian banning.

I in NO way would defend anyone that does stupid sh#t with their drone (and squishy is spot-on in the assessment that it's not the drone it's the stupid people - and I mean f*#k it let's just ban stupid people). I'm building a site specifically to call out the dou chebags. Probably won't really go far with it as it seems pointless.

Tom/Pagan and I are starting our UAV service business on one simple philosophy - UAVs can be used to save lives - both human and animal. We're submitting our application to the FAA for our 333 Exemption which will allow us to fly commercially. Most of our ops will be doing IR imaging of infrastructure (ski lift towers, roof tops, solar panels) or surveying work (wait until you play with my Nautalis dome mesh file/project - a new way to make a climbing guide or something). Requirements for operating under the 333 include that the person in charge be a pilot (I'm doing rec pilot training with an added ground school component that focuses on integrating our vehicles into the NAS), our vehicles will be registered with the FAA (with N tail number), we'll be fully insured, we operate under 200 feet, and cannot operate within 500' of persons not involved in the ops.

oh and squishy... I flew my first fixed wings yesterday. no crashes. going to build the flight test blueprint wing out of $2 foam and go crash that sh#t until I don't.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 12:02pm PT
When the Cessna and F16 collided a UAV operator was used to do a survey mission of the lake where they suspected the two bodies from the Cessna were. They flew a survey mission taking photos from above, uploaded those images to a cloud where software did stitching and mesh rendering. they were able to use the mesh to get a better view of where things were in the lake. sadly, they found what they were looking for.

I did a survey of Aya's house. here's a movie I made of me playing with the mesh file on my computer.

[Click to View YouTube Video]

if you are interested in the playing with the mesh file i can send it. Meshlab which is a free mac app is what I'm using.

taking this to a bigger scale.... the Nautilus. I can draw lines (routes?) in the mesh file.
mucci

Trad climber
The pitch of Bagalaar above you
Jul 19, 2015 - 12:17pm PT
Squishy, come join us at the NRA.

Hehe

Seriously, you can race them, make money with them, build them etc...

As long as I can take them down when they are threatening my privacy.

That's fair. The bad pilots lose drones, the good pilots don't.

This is Amorika, we are never behind the times.



squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 01:12pm PT
Your failing good sir, is thinking you have privacy in the terms YOU define it...privacy in the US is an interesting subject..


You are in a billion photos and video clips you don't know about already and you don't seem to care at all about that...

But drones...where a camera is just a tiny piece of it's whole, you get your little panties all in a bunch...

Biased much?

And why?
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 01:13pm PT
Oh and, good luck with that...
http://petapixel.com/2015/06/29/man-wins-lawsuit-against-neighbor-who-shot-down-drone-with-shotgun/
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 01:15pm PT
Again, drones do not threaten privacy...

People threaten your privacy, and there's a giant F%$@#$^ing list of laws governing it already, go turn them in if you think they are breaking any laws. We govern people already when it comes to privacy, not the tools they use.

Stop humping the drones like you got a crush on them and go worry about what you are really worried about...or think you are..
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 01:43pm PT
At this time, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has classified drones as ‘aircrafts’ meaning that shooting at one is technically a violation of federal law
and can carry a sentence of up to 20 years in prison.


Seriously, you can race them, make money with them, build them etc...

As long as I can take them down when they are threatening my privacy.

so let me get this straight. your bargaining chip here is we can continue to do our legal activity so long as you can commit a crime when you don't like what is going on. Did I get that right?
mucci

Trad climber
The pitch of Bagalaar above you
Jul 19, 2015 - 02:10pm PT
If you are Peeping with the units, yes.


Wait, it's legal for you guys to peep?
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 02:22pm PT
how did you get from us racing them, building them, making money with them to peeping?

where I disagree a bit with squishy is that though he's 100% correct that the laws are already on the books I expect them to be tweaked especially in the privacy area.

But i also have to laugh at the idea that these will be a good tool to invade someones privacy. Tom Evans has a tool that is much more effective for peeping - his bigass lens and silence. meanwhile the little cam - go pro or whatever - with the wide angle lens attached to a loud upside down floating lawnmower... yeah... nobody gonna notice that.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 02:40pm PT
That's why they call people like that"backwards" or "throwbacks"
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Jul 19, 2015 - 02:43pm PT
I am only adding because here on the suburban roll in gun loving connecticut someone up loaded a youtube vidieo of a drone with a hand gun attached,[Click to View YouTube Video]
thats enough of that,this is to long too but you get the idea. [Click to View YouTube Video]
we used to fire Estees rockets house to house , the damage and the requisite painting of houses led to some neighbors going into house painting for life,
A life sentence in painters pants, and climbing, only it came with lots of annoying wasp stings, and hot ladders.


nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 02:55pm PT
the kid that built that is the same one that got his ass kicked in this video:
[Click to View YouTube Video]

now in the video the psycho woman is the one in the wrong and she paid for it with humiliation and court dates.

But to build a machine with a gun - makes you wonder if the kid isn't a little messed up in the head. Although at the same time I'm doubting we will be hearing about him on the nightly news for using it.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 03:16pm PT
Did you see the one where the fire fighters turn their hose on a drone while they were fighting a fire (actually it was pretty much out)? Good on the FD though I wonder if they got in a little trouble.

I think they should put scramblers on commercial airliners but that is currently illegal (scrambling). Blast it with some high power 2.4Ghz or UHF and send that sucker to the ground.


I'm going to continue to point out when you guys propose something illegal (taking it out is destroying someones personal property). I'm doing that for two reasons.

1) I like most of you and would prefer you not see court dates.

2) I'm going through a long and time consuming process that will probably cost me $13K when it is all said and done to be able to legally operate (commercially).

If we're going to have this discussion - which we are - then I'm more than happy to engage in it so long as we're heading in the right direction. Voice your opinion. fine. Call your congressmen. Please! Learn what the laws on privacy and use of the NAS are. But I find the notion of committing a crime to stop someone that is not committing a crime terribly misguided.




Pagan is working towards building a hardened vehicle that would probably withstand the supersoaker. Oddly you can take the electric motors and stick them under water while running and they will continue to work just fine. Not so much with the other components. His plan is to be able to fly around the coal stacks outside of Salt Lake. On inversion days they remove the scrubbers and pollute pollute pollute. He's going to equip it with an Arduino sensor array to get real data. But when he does that I don't know him. Nor do I have bail money.
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Jul 19, 2015 - 03:35pm PT
Nature , hello,
I saw the 'beat down' video and had to decide, you can not put the toothpaste back into the same tube from whence it came. Corral it with laws and make criminals of forward thinkers.[Click to View YouTube Video] that is not the side that I want to be on. that said I can't risk growing
my babies in pots in the backyard, anymore (as if I ever could)
I am more about this; it is the most recent tool in the climbers bag of trix,
I want one that is way beyond my price range now.
Give it another few years though, and 'Drones' (a name change maybe?)
will be a regular up-grade with every phone sold.
wow i have to spend more time looking back at this tread!
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jul 19, 2015 - 03:58pm PT
Every time there's a fire a no fly notice goes out, people are flying drones in a no fly zone. Has it been enforced? There's existing laws here not being enforced right? So why do we need new laws?



--------because it is not working?

Because the industry, as represented by you, in not interested in policing itself.

So don't gripe, as the industry is subject to ever-tighter and more restrictive laws, and increasing penalties.
mouse from merced

Trad climber
The finger of fate, my friends, is fickle.
Jul 19, 2015 - 04:01pm PT
http://lasvegassun.com/news/2015/jul/08/nevada-companies-get-ok-use-drones-aerial-photogra/

"You sound exactly like the people who tried to ban automobiles because they would kill everyone and take over the roads and scare all the horses...that's just how wrong you are," said Squishy.

Au contraire, Squishy.

Automobiles have taken over all the roads, killing hundreds of thousands of people, dogs, birds, and wildlife along the way to dominance. And where are the horses now because of the automobiles? Safe in their paddocks and pastures, effectively retired except for leisure activities.

Why, my polo string is perfect example, I would think.

But meanwhile, out in the open, autos are not flyin' around overhead. It's drones that are; and they are dangerous in the hands of fools.

Squishy, you're no fool, for you use your pet machine wisely and to the benefit of us here and to that of your own mental health as a hobby. The Trouble comes when ignorant, irresponsible jack-wads are allowed to control them and take them to heights they have no business occupying.

You surely must agree to that.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jul 19, 2015 - 04:03pm PT
Maybe the law would work if it were ... wait for it ... enforced?

squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 04:07pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jul 19, 2015 - 04:12pm PT
good to hear that #7-1/2 conventional shot is effective and nothing more exotic is required.

Kinda like slo-mo trap shooting I would imagine.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 04:15pm PT
Because the industry, as represented by you, in not interested in policing itself.

by Squishy » Wed Jun 18, 2014 10:01 am
http://parkflysac.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2182

Posted: May 3, 2014
http://flitetest.com/articles/the-drone-revolution
doughnutnational

Gym climber
its nice here in the spring
Jul 19, 2015 - 04:18pm PT
Hey squish, with all your drone love posting on various site do you even have time to climb?
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 04:19pm PT
I'd really enjoy these morons in a courtroom trying to explain to the judge how flying their little boy nerd toys over a military installation and having me shoot them down, is somehow a violation of their rights.

Dude I would help you ID the RF and such to lock on better...lol I also see a lot of cute video from fools near dams, bridges and civil infrastructure...just hovering around making stupid video of a sunset and absolutely no idea of the implications. There hasn't been education or an informational campaign to go along with the marketing of vendors, so we find ourselves in the chaos of revolution. basically in plain English, you have a bunch of throw backs and dummies still afraid of stuff they need to be learning how to use for it to truly solve the problem, sound familiar? Just like the industrial revolution and informational before it..
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 04:24pm PT
I'd really enjoy these morons in a courtroom trying to explain to the judge how flying their little boy nerd toys over a military installation and having me shoot them down, is somehow a violation of their rights.

Oh well snap! In that case it didn't happen w/o video. And I wanna see the video. Blast away bro especially if you're not getting into trouble.


I really hope the little boy toys die off as a fad. The rest of us will then have much easier time of flying commercially. I actually think it will die off. I was out flying yesterday flying fixed wing with my buddy in the park. Looks like Lakewood city council is going to approve the area for designated flying. The thing is almost everyone out there is flying fixed wing. Flying multi-rotor really isn't that much fun after a while unless you are doing something with it. Buzzing around collecting hundreds of hours of boring gopro footage that will never see the light of day can't be a thing for long. can it?

I'm going to be wickedly psyched to get the FLIR Veu and strap that onto the beast and be an active volunteer for the local SAR units.


and squish... pretty sure elcap doesn't need help on the lock ;)
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 04:31pm PT
Hey squish, with all your drone love posting on various site do you even have time to climb?


I just did a super hard adventure climb in early july with my 2 year old, lol http://www.supertopo.com/tripreport/tripreport.php?articleid=12783

I got on Tenaya Peak this year too, so that's at least something..

I'll be getting out more, hopefully, if my daughter enjoys it.

I'm a single father with a day job, I don't get out and climb as much as you hard men elites..
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 04:36pm PT
I view it like skateboarding, hopefully we will get designed airspace and fields for drones to just have at it and full scale with souls will know where they are like everything else. That would be cool, to have like drone parks. then let the kids play. The thing that most people don't realize is that the kids playing with this stuff is what invented it, if you stop that, you stop the very progress of a, what? 19 billion dollar industry...so you either get it or you don't...maybe homework is in order...more homework..
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 04:39pm PT
The Trouble comes when ignorant, irresponsible jack-wads are allowed to control them and take them to heights they have no business occupying.

You surely must agree to that.


I'm fairly certain that both squishy and I have stated that we do agree (on multiple occasions).

irresponsible jack-wads exist in every aspect of life. there's nothing new here except the object in question. the stupid humans still exist in massive quantities.


Give it another few years though, and 'Drones' (a name change maybe?)

You'll notice that when I refer to them as a professional tool I call them UAV's, vehicles, etc. When I refer to some dou chebag that did something dumb I call them drones.

But just don't get started on that. The "industry" is already struggling with it and it's gotten to the point of comical. And narcissistic.



There was a story out of the military base on Colorado Springs where one of the fixed wings they used to patrol the perimeter did a fly away and landed in someones front yard. The guy that found it gave it back. But the comments in the story from all the people that said they keep it or do something otherwise was seriously pathetic. And it got worse when the tin-foilers got involved. The vehicle wasn't patrolling the base it was.... I dunno.... ramping up for Jade Helm 15.
Todd Eastman

climber
Bellingham, WA
Jul 19, 2015 - 04:49pm PT
Is air space a commons? Is it regulated for other uses? Step in line to lobby for drones ongoing and apparently increased use of those commons...
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 05:02pm PT
It depends on the classification of the air space.

A, C, D, E,F air space is controlled.

G is not

UAVs are simply not allowed in A airspace as it starts at 18,000 above sea level.

Class C is restricted and it's what is over major air ports. You have to be granted permission to enter

Class D is essentially the same but it's military.

Class E is where we can enter if we give ATC or air port manager notification (access does not need to be granted).

Class F is similar to E but can switch to G like at night when control or managers go home.

Class G is wide open to 400 feet. No permission necessary - nothing other then the basic non-regs the FAA has in place.

so that's our NAS (national air space). Every UAV operator needs to know this stuff. Almost none do nor will they.

The kicker is that by definition NAS begins a 1mm above the ground. And that's obviously ridiculous. How much air space do you own above your house? You don't own to to space. That's been held up in courts over and over and over again. You are entitled to your privacy but the definition on where that begins is essentially at a "reasonable height". That's another area of the laws that has got to get hashed out.

So places we are allowed to fly:

public lands unless otherwise noted via a TFR NOTAM.

Oddly we can take off outside of Wilderness, fly over it, and return to launch and that's also OK. I suppose I'm ok with that because at best these vehicles will barely every penetrate wilderness as they are (better be) too vast.

where we cannot

No flying in the NPS. One I fully support.

DC anywhere.

In boulder the open space is closed to flying. I support that as well.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jul 19, 2015 - 05:06pm PT
"How much air space do you own above your house? You don't own to to space."


I'd say anything below the tops of your tallest trees is for sure yours.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 05:09pm PT
at a minimum.

I'd say as far as my gun can shoot ;-)
Guernica

climber
dark places
Jul 19, 2015 - 05:10pm PT
I built RC gliders with my dad when I was growing up (father/son projects don't get any better than that), and after decades away from RC, have recently started flying again- including fixed wing as well as multi-rotors. All you haters, who apparently get up on the wrong side of the bed every damn day, are fvckin' missing out man. These things are fun as hell, just tremendously fun, and you're both foolish and a curmudgeon if you want them "banned". The unethical and illegal flights should be very frowned upon, we all agree to that, but don't piss on everyone else's parade, k?
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 05:16pm PT
Thanks cosmic. This is about to become my life. my escape from my day job sitting at a computer 5 days a week. Ultimately I want get the hell out of this country and head to Costa Rica to use this technology to monitor coastal waters. Protect sharks and whales, etc.

I could be a little off on the air space so any real pilots please correct. We have to follow the same rules as pilots except we cannot go above 400 feet and they cannot go below it (when possible). That might be a bit simplified but it's what keeps us all from getting buzzed by planes for no reason.

Here's a small snippet of an air space map. Every UAV operator that is operating commercially should know it. I don't expect the kid with the toy flying over Will and his shot gun to, however :).


basically air space is defined by a series of upside down wedding cake layers.

the thick blue line is DIA air space. But as you can see it's way beyond the five mile rule as that's Boulder in the yellow on the left. What's going on is DIA controls their class C between 10000 and 12000 feet above ground level. so planes landing at smaller air ports simply need to come in under 10K. Boulder Airport doesn't even have defined air space which can be seen by the G in the diamond. I live less than a mile from it but I can fly w/o notification. Though if I got close I'd give the air port manager a call and let him know of any ops I might be engaged in.


and Guernica is right. These things are a fricking hoot to fly. Rarely do I meet anyone that isn't very interested and curious. Most people think it's cool stuff.

But truth be told if I try to never fly around people but I won't always be able to do that.

zBrown

Ice climber
Jul 19, 2015 - 05:31pm PT
I don't think drones are going away. How else are you gonna get your Amazon package delivered overnight?

What are the current regulations? More importantly what new legislation is coming down (or up) the pike?

It's interesting to note that it is illegal to fly a kite on Coronado Beach, presumably because of it's proximtity to North Island Naval Air Station.

Can one kite surf at Coronado?


nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 05:32pm PT
You can group operators into 3 basic groups.

The first is the old timers that have been flying for years and are members of the AMA, etc.

The second is those of us flying commercially.

The third is group that got a phantom for christmas and doesn't have clue what ethical flying is or what rules might be in place.

That's a bit general but will serve my point. You won't see the first group doing anything stupid. They are educated, fly ethically (they wrote those rules) and insured. They usually fly in their AMA parks.

The second group might push it a bit more but the same thing is going on. We fly ethically, are educated, and generally follow the rules. It's paramount to your livelihood.

The third group is the anything can happen group. Most people do the right thing. But as we've seen many do not and do stupid sh#t.

My point is this - the rules/laws/regs that we're either going to see put in place or changed are going to apply differently to these groups. Nothing will change for group one. Group two we await final regs and though many of the rules are slightly prohibitive we're ok with that. If we need we can apply for a COA to operate outside of the rules. Generally though the proposed rules are favorable to commercial ops and $18B in economy influx in the next four years.

No idea what the FAA is going to do with the last group. Arm a team of monkeys with baseball bats and start beating heads would be a start.


zBrown I posted this after I read your post but I think it might give you some insight. And the reason why "drone" use is not on that sign is because it's already illegal to fly due to the Class D airspace. I'm sure it happens all the time though.

If you want insight into what the FAA is proposing for commercial ops the NPRM lays it out:
http://www.faa.gov/uas/nprm/


Anders for the win
Braunini

Big Wall climber
cupertino
Jul 19, 2015 - 05:58pm PT
Nature -

Class F is an ICAO airspace class and isn't used in the US. Class G extends to either 700 or 1200 feet depending on what it's bounded by. Class A is above 18000 feet MSL. B and C are controlled airspace surrounding major airports as you said. Class D is a 5 statue mile radius around towered airports, civilian or military. Class E is essentially the same as G, but has higher weather minimums to fly in legally. If the weather is lower than those minimums an ATC clearance is required, otherwise not.

The short version :)

nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 19, 2015 - 06:12pm PT
Braunini - thanks. I must have been looking at an older chart. I'm just learning this stuff but am dug in pretty deep with the ground stuff. Pretty complicated so not all of it has stuck. I should have gone into the modules I did and pulled it out of there. Would have been a better refresher than pulling it out of something totally incorrect. Or maybe I just used a chart for another country :)

confirming everything you said. sorta. It's becoming fun stuffing my head full of new information. Though I'm knot going to learn how to read weather.


oh well maybe i'll rework it tomorrow.
Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Jul 19, 2015 - 06:17pm PT
Can one kite surf at Coronado?

Interesting sign, it is a matter of interpretation as to whether or not kite flying is actually illegal.

The code section cited is actually California Public Utility Code Section 21646 (CPVC is Chlorinated polyvinyl chloride, typically plumbing pipe)

If you read the code it only prohibits objects being flown within five miles IF it might be ingested or obstruct a pilots view. A kite on the beach might not be prohibited under the state code. There could be Federal law that would apply.

21646. It shall be a misdemeanor for any person to release or fly
or cause to be released or flown, within five miles of any airport,
any moored balloon, kite, unmanned rocket, or unmanned free balloon
which might be ingested by an aircraft engine or might cause a pilot'
s view of the airport and zone approach to be obstructed, or which
could be used to suspend an object capable of endangering airborne
aircraft or impairing a pilot's vision.

Drones are not addressed

Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jul 19, 2015 - 08:34pm PT
zBrown writes:

"It's interesting to note that it is illegal to fly a kite on Coronado Beach, presumably because of it's proximtity to North Island Naval Air Station."


Mr Beck writes:

"If you read the code it only prohibits objects being flown within five miles IF it might be ingested or obstruct a pilots view. A kite on the beach might not be prohibited under the state code."



The whole San Diego area is more or less off-limits to my kites. Damn few places in San Diego are over five miles from an airport, because there are just so damn many of them.

There's a bunch of stuff in San Diego I'd like to get kite-aerial pics of; USS Midway, Star Of India ( tall ship ), Old Point Loma Lighthouse, etc. But there's an airfield or something within a mile or two of all those places. I can fudge on the five-mile-limit and be OK if it's three or four miles from an airport, but two miles is a little close. Especially when my kite is at least 100' up before I even attach the camera.



ElCap... quotes:

"it shall be unlawful to make any photograph, sketch, picture, drawing, map, or graphical representation of such vital military and naval installations or equipment without first obtaining permission..."


I'm in trouble if The Man ever sees my photostream.

( Port Townsend, WA. NOT San Diego )
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jul 19, 2015 - 08:44pm PT
"How much air space do you own above your house? You don't own to space."

Yes you do. From the surface you own down to the center of the earth, and upwards to the edge of the universe.

At 500' above your tallest structure is the beginning of a public aviation easement. You still own that airspace, but it is subject to that public easement.

Since drones cannot operate above 500', a drone cannot overfly your property legally without your permission.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jul 19, 2015 - 09:01pm PT
Gary, I was told the same thing when I purchased this place.
It might depend on where you live, maybe?
zBrown

Ice climber
Jul 20, 2015 - 06:59am PT
Chaz:

Silver Strand
Torrey Pines Glider Port
Mt. Soledad
Mt. Laguna
Mt. Palomar
Lake Morena
Otay Lakes

Iron Mountain
Actually a pretty good chunk of the east County

I think your photos at the border were pretty close to Ream Field, but I won't tell. Ream used to be known as the helicopter capital of the world (1960's),

I know it's not the same but you can get the Midway and Star of India from the tops of higher buildings down town.

The Lighthouse is a tricky one.

Note: One of the longer gliding flights on record is a round trip from Torrey Pines to Mt. Soledad and back.





CA.Timothy

climber
California
Jul 20, 2015 - 07:24am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
CA.Timothy

climber
California
Jul 20, 2015 - 07:38am PT
Squishy could you tell us more about the drone revolution? I would like to hear more about how the US is lagging behind in this area.


I get your argument. Its the people not the tool. Unfortunately, too many people cant use this tool responsibly.

I am willing to sacrifice the enjoyment and use by the responsible to ensure that those who are not responsible do not impair others privacy, interrupt their wilderness experience, and get in the way of EMS responders.

Why should the general public be allowed to fly those things wherever and whenever under 400 feet? Why shouldn't you have to demonstrate competence and get licensed? Do car rules/regs prevent all injuries? No. But they prevent some (an amount that is not measurable).


Your comment about designated spaces for drone use like skate parks was rational. I like that you compared your user group to skateboarders. Two different activities that the general public does not care for in their personal space, and the members of that group insists no harm what-so-ever results from the activity. Spot on.

Now gtf out of the shopping center staircase and get back to the skatepark with your skateboard...err drone

EDIT: you commented that my image and likeness is already on tons of video that I do not want it on. true. So because local and federal entities install cameras all over the public space, you and your group have the right to fly a mobile fleet of security cameras for your own personal use?

you sound like an entitled little kid. it doesnt really matter if you guys like drones and some of the time are operating within the law. Most of us don't. It is called courtesy in principal, and in the case of you as#@&%es getting in the way of ems responders, it is called dangerous. But hey, its fun for you, so keep on!!

EDIT 2:

No one is saying drones dont have a use. Using them for a variety of professional, scientific, and business endeavors is useful. No one is advocating for their professional use to stop. Most of us want the hobbyist that make up the vast majority of the flyers to stop flying like voyeuristic pervs, and have enforcement and penalties be enough to deter.
Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Jul 20, 2015 - 07:56am PT
Chaz - the CPUC code is not a blanket ban on flying within 5 miles of an airport. It is a ban that is in effect only if your specific activity presents an ingestion or visual hazard. Flying a kite 100 feet off the deck 2 miles from an airport would never be a hazard, so the ban would not apply. The standard traffic pattern is 1000 feet above ground level, and patterns rarely extend more than a half mile from the runway.

edit - I just checked and there is Federal regulations about kite flying near airports, it is Title 14 of the CFR, section 101. It allows kite operation in a restricted area under 150 feet by merely giving notice to the FAA 24 hours in advance. Federal law takes precedent over state law.

§101.13 Operating limitations.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate a moored balloon or kite—

(1) Less than 500 feet from the base of any cloud;

(2) More than 500 feet above the surface of the earth;

(3) From an area where the ground visibility is less than three miles; or

(4) Within five miles of the boundary of any airport.

(b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to the operation of a balloon or kite below the top of any structure and within 250 feet of it, if that shielded operation does not obscure any lighting on the structure.

return arrow Back to Top

§101.15 Notice requirements.
No person may operate an unshielded moored balloon or kite more than 150 feet above the surface of the earth unless, at least 24 hours before beginning the operation, he gives the following information to the FAA ATC facility that is nearest to the place of intended operation:

(a) The names and addresses of the owners and operators.

(b) The size of the balloon or the size and weight of the kite.

(c) The location of the operation.

(d) The height above the surface of the earth at which the balloon or kite is to be operated.

(e) The date, time, and duration of the operation.
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jul 20, 2015 - 08:05am PT
Gary, I was told the same thing when I purchased this place.
It might depend on where you live, maybe?

There are exceptions to everything, but that's generally the case in the US. Any drone flying around your property is trespassing. Back where I come from trespassers were greeted with a load of rock salt from a shotgun.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 20, 2015 - 08:09am PT
Yes you do. From the surface you own down to the center of the earth, and upwards to the edge of the universe.

Nope, not at all. Above 500' is National Air Space and that's been upheld a number of times. Below 500' it's a grey area. United States v. Causby. The Holding:
A man does not have control and ownership over the airspace of their property except within reasonable limits to utilize their property. Airspace above a set minimum height is property of the Masses and no one man can accuse airplanes or other such craft within of trespassing on what they own.

so your ownership stops somewhere between 80' and 500'. No real ruling on that and the '46 case specifically left that out. This is an area that needs to get hashed out.


The 80' number comes from the '46 case. an aircraft flying at around 80' caused Causby's chickens to go nuts and kill themselves. He won that case as he should have.


I would like to hear more about how the US is lagging behind in this area.

In terms of commercial use the US is way behind. at the moment there are less than 800 333 Exemptions granted to allow for legal commercial operations (at least legal in the eyes of the FAA - there's no court precedent on any level).

The US appears to be way ahead of the game of using the toy version to do stupid sh#t.
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Jul 20, 2015 - 08:10am PT
Above 400' you own nothing, so if you shoot it down and it's 400' you go to jail. Also for discharging a firearm with in city limits.
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Jul 20, 2015 - 08:12am PT
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 20, 2015 - 08:50am PT
Shotguns, water guns and rocks - you guys are going about it the wrong way.

Don't Laze me Bro!


[Click to View YouTube Video]
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jul 20, 2015 - 12:52pm PT
zBrown writes:

"I think your photos at the border were pretty close to Ream Field, but I won't tell. Ream used to be known as the helicopter capital of the world (1960's)"


I think it may be called Imperial Beach OLF now. It's only about two miles from where I get shots peering over the border into the Tijuana Bullring - with 500' of line out. I'm within a few hundred feet of the border there, closer than the military aircraft will get.

I don't think the Border Patrol even flies their aircraft that close to the border. If I were in their way, they wouldn't keep it to themselves.

( ADAM 69 on the Mexican Border - Monument 258 at the top for reference )

Most of what I do around Fort Casey State Park on Whidbey is close to their OLF. It's deserted most of the time, but when the Navy is using it, you'll know it. They use the OLF in Coupeville for F-18 carrier landing practice like once or twice a month and the noise gives them away every time. Nobody at Fort Casey ever brings in their kites when the Navy's flying, and I've seen some I know are up way over 500'. The Navy never flies over Fort Casey. Just around it.



Mr Beck writes:

"Chaz - the CPUC code is not a blanket ban on flying within 5 miles of an airport. It is a ban that is in effect only if your specific activity presents an ingestion or visual hazard. Flying a kite 100 feet off the deck 2 miles from an airport would never be a hazard, so the ban would not apply."

Let me clear up something on the KAP ( kite aerial photography ) concept.

100' is the absolute minimum airspace overhead I need to keep safe. The kite will be at least 100' up before I hook the camera to the kite string.

( for scale, that's a nine-foot wingspan kite exactly 100' from the camera attachment )

We do that to damp any vibration coming off the kite, and for me, launching one thing at a time is always a good idea.

Sometimes when the wind is blowing gusty-crazy close to the ground, I'll let the kite out several hundred feet, so it flies in smoother air, before tying the camera on.

On this shot, the camera's only up about 50 feet, but the kite's 350' up.


I consider my kites a hazard to any other aircraft. I always keep them under 500'. I'm not interested in sharing the airspace with anyone. If I see low-flying aircraft - or know they may be coming, like around a brush fire - I'm done. I just fold everything up and either go somewhere else or come back a different day.

I'm even a hazard to other kites. I found that out in Seattle, at Gasworks Park.


I thought it'd be cool to get a shot looking down into the group of kite flyers flying kites on Kite Flyers' Hill, and maybe catch someone standing in the Human Sundial so I'd know what time the shot was taken. And it probably would have been cool, except about as soon as I had everything flying and hooked up, the guy next to me and I tangled up our lines. While we were horsing around getting our lines straight, the guy said he sometimes hangs his pocket Canon on his kite string by its wriststrap and brings back aerial shots that way. He had no idea anybody else ever did anything like that, and had never heard of KAP.

nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 20, 2015 - 02:01pm PT
The next piece of equipment I'll be hanging from a vehicle.

http://www.flir.com/flirvue/
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jul 20, 2015 - 02:41pm PT
Above 400' you own nothing...

Then how are 1000+' buildings allowed?

Christ almighty! You guys are going to make me research this?

"Cuius est solum, eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos" is a basic principle of common law.
And lastly, the earth hath in law a great extent upwards, not only of water as hath been said, but of aire, and all other things even up to heaven, for cujus est solum ejus est usque ad coelum, as it is holden.

US v. Causby
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/328/256/
A servitude has been imposed upon the land for which respondents are entitled to compensation under the Fifth Amendment.

By "A servitude" they are saying the property is serviant to the public aviation easement. Much like the public highway easement most property in this country is subject to. If you own property, your property extends to the centerline of the road it fronts onto. If the local government abandons that road you would then have full control of the property out to the centerline.

On the other hand it states:
It also argues that the landowner does not own superadjacent airspace which he has not subjected to possession by the erection of structures or other occupancy.

It then states:
(d) Flights of aircraft over private land which are so low and frequent as to be a direct and immediate interference with the enjoyment and use of the land are as much an appropriation of the use of the land as a more conventional entry upon it.

Griggs v. Allegehny County:
Held: the County has taken an air easement over petitioner's property for which it must pay just compensation as required by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Regulation 60.17, entitled "Minimum safe altitudes," provides:

"Except when necessary for take-off or landing, no person shall operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:"

"(a) Anywhere. An altitude which will permit, in the event of the failure of a power unit, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface;"

"(b) Over congested areas. Over the congested areas of cities, towns or settlements, or over an open-air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet from the aircraft. . . ."

"(c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In such event, the aircraft shall not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure. . . ."

They seem to be treating anything over 500 feet as an easement.

Under 500 feet there is no easement. Flying under 500 feet is treated as a "taking". Drones cannot fly above 500 feet. If a drone flies over your property it is trespassing.

Thus is my proclamation.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jul 21, 2015 - 03:05pm PT
It seems that one of the main problems that is created, is anonymity.

This could be solved by a process of marking every drone with an internal ID that can only be gotten to by destroying the drone. Record the ID upon sale.

Then, when the offending drone is destroyed, one can ID the owner. Police to then follow.

I would think that the progressive use of EMP technology will be able to bring the drones down quickly:

[Click to View YouTube Video]

Then you ID the owner.
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Jul 21, 2015 - 03:11pm PT
A couple interesting drone stories from recent news:

Attack on the drones: Legislation could allow California firefighters to take them down
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-anti-drone-legislation-20150721-story.html

Hacking Team and Boeing Subsidiary Envisioned Drones Deploying Spyware
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/07/18/hacking-team-wanted-infect-computers-drone/
ladyscarlett

Trad climber
SF Bay Area, California
Jul 21, 2015 - 03:51pm PT
I heard a rumor that someone figured out how to rig a 9mm to a drone, be able to aim and fire with pretty good accuracy.

Wow, I thought Black Ops all over would take those people into the fold before they put their knowledge on the web...

Hrm

Cheers

LS
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Jul 21, 2015 - 03:54pm PT
^ ladyscarlett,

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/gun-firing-drone-video-draws-federal-scrutiny/

[Click to View YouTube Video]
ladyscarlett

Trad climber
SF Bay Area, California
Jul 21, 2015 - 04:46pm PT
Huh?

:O

Cheers

LS
zBrown

Ice climber
Jul 21, 2015 - 07:49pm PT
Drone gunz? ... pffffffffffffft ... gimme a flamethrower anyday


Totally legal.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jul 21, 2015 - 08:28pm PT
For something like the search for Mathew they could be a huge asset. there are some problems though.

Short operating time.

Recharging batteries.

wind sensitivity

The weight of packing in a drone would be minimal. Everything to make it work for an extended search might be a challenge.

squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 22, 2015 - 08:34am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 22, 2015 - 08:51am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 22, 2015 - 09:12am PT
wow....

up to 20 years in prison and up to a quarter million in fines

http://gizmodo.com/is-it-ok-to-shoot-down-your-neighbors-drone-1718055028

git yer guns... and yer soap on a rope
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 22, 2015 - 09:17am PT
So if I throw a net over the thing then I didn't shoot it down and you're gonna have to
trespass to get it back, like it is gonna remain on my property.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 22, 2015 - 09:18am PT
yeah, i saw that legislation piece. it's a good idea. also need to arm commercial airliners in some way shape or form.

Federal prison is a homecoming... alright... whatever floats your boat bro...


good luck with that net. most of the time they'd never be close. but if you did succeed at least you wouldn't end up doing hard time. I'd hate to see that.

though any video a drone might capture of you trying to get it with a net would be entertaining to watch.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 22, 2015 - 09:21am PT
me? you're the one bitching and moaning left and right every time there is a sighting by a commercial airline.

hypocrite much?

Edit: though perhaps you are misunderstanding me. I'm not suggeting arming them with guns. A scrambler would do the trick. is that something you might agree on?
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 22, 2015 - 09:24am PT
yeah, I was not clear. apologies.

but good luck getting them outlawed. But if that is your stance I encourage you to write your representatives.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 22, 2015 - 09:33am PT
stop trolling me! LOL! I'm fairly certain i've made my stance clear on the interactions of dou chebag flying toys and manned aircraft.

glad you wrote your reps.

I want this for the Monterey UW shootout next month
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jul 22, 2015 - 09:40am PT
Also for discharging a firearm with in city limits.

This must also be dependent on where you live.

There is no law state wide in SD for discharging a firearm in cities, and as far as I know there are no cities in SD that have adopted this law either.

The state does have a law for reckless discharge of a firearm that could be applied within cities, they must show recklessness though.


I just saw that video of a drone with a pistol mounted on it.

Thats great news for those that haven't thought of that yet...not.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 22, 2015 - 09:47am PT
the 18 year old with the armed drone is in deep sh#t IMHO. The FBI is investigating. That story has been making the rounds. Speaking of rounds I ran across a video of some guys who mounted an M-16 an a 1 meter class octo. Wonder why they are not in jail. maybe they are.
Trashman

Trad climber
SLC
Jul 22, 2015 - 10:24am PT
Latest on the 18 yo is he's falling through the same loopholes that allow for toys to be treated as aircraft cited in the gizmodo; tech getting ahead of legislation.

Good news is all these responsible drone owners are doing a good job of ensuring that legislation will come quickly(and hopefully in a over reactive fashion).
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 22, 2015 - 10:40am PT
not just the good/responsible operators. Anyone that writes their representatives is helping to get legislation in place (or amended).

On the flip-side for commercial use we have the FAA and their foot dragging. Seven years later we still do not have regs in place. But they are ramping up quickly the 333 exemption process so for those of us who are trying to do everything "legally" it's a painful process that is taking less time. and I put legally in quotes because as per anything else the FAA touches it's a big grey area. We'll be seen as legal - but that doesn't mean others are illegal. FML
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 22, 2015 - 10:46am PT
For these new audiences it is, and it's like mind blowing...wow, jezz and fear mongering...it's simply not knowing..dare I say it...ignorance of the subject..

But they sure do sound like they know what they are talking about huh? That's the illusion of the charlatan..lol
ladyscarlett

Trad climber
SF Bay Area, California
Jul 22, 2015 - 12:47pm PT
I can see how it would be nothing new to have firearms mounted on these lil buggers, but like I said before...

I'd thought Black Ops absorbed the hardware and the people who create those rigs.

Then I wouldn't have to see youtube vids of it and get all worked up!

Messes with my profit margin for peeps to get scared of drones ya know!

Cheers

LS
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 22, 2015 - 01:42pm PT
So now your insinuating I'm a climbing charlatan? nice..par for the course dingus...let it out man, be a ass, call me names, it happens when you lack an measurable argument..

Do you have anything of value to add to this convo or is it just a place for you to express your personal fear? I am surprised such an accomplished "climber" such as you would be so afraid of a "toy". as long as we are calling each other names, I might as well one up you and point out that your vagina is showing...
ladyscarlett

Trad climber
SF Bay Area, California
Jul 22, 2015 - 01:55pm PT
I'd be wary Squishster...

I know some Vaginas that will RIP YOU UP!

Maybe it's something else you see, and you can't come up with anything other than Vagina. I mean, I know of some Vaginas that can take it all...and still be fresh for the party!

I don't see any drones with Vaginas...just sayin'

Cheers!

LS
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 22, 2015 - 02:17pm PT
lol..yeah I rethought the vag comment afterwards..."wait there's tons of ladies in the taco (that came out funny)...oh well...you guys get what I'm saying...

Dingus here is afraid of something he knows little about, so how can he assess any risk? Pretty simple really...and that old phrase about ignorance breeding fear is exemplified here.

Dingus did you know we have been flying as high as 10,000 feet, in excess of 10 miles and at speeds over 100mph, all around your town...FOR OVER 10 YEARS!! Point at the incident that scared you so much? oh yeah you can't, because there hasn't been one...lol
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 22, 2015 - 02:22pm PT
AGL or MSL? ;-)
TLP

climber
Jul 22, 2015 - 02:51pm PT
Some of the work that I do could really make good use of drones, and for that very reason I support regulations that are very restrictive on their use, like operation only within the air space above your own private property, or property for which you have written permission, to a height of no more than 200 feet (higher only with notice and flight plan), licensing and insurance, presumptive civil and criminal liability for any consequence of their operation, individual identifiers on board (physical number) and broadcast continuously while flying, etc. No legitimate commercial operator would have a problem with any of those.

This is a standard case of people touting commercial benefits of all this money, with the risks and negatives to be borne by everyone else. If you really think they're that good of an addition to the world, support pretty rigid regulation, otherwise people who are adversely affected will put an end to them sooner or later.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 22, 2015 - 02:56pm PT
Well put, TLP. Most drone 'uses' are on a par with 'rain-sensitive'
windshield wipers IMHO.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 22, 2015 - 03:40pm PT
TLP - those are pretty much the conditions under which I will have to operate under with my 333 Exemption. Same with everyone with the standard 333 exemption.

There are a few more restrictions as well.
1) Line of site (daytime only)
2) Minimum two person operation (one spotter)
3) We also have to have our air craft registered with the FAA the same as any other experimental manned aerial vehicle.
4) No persons not involved with the ops can be within 500'

Although the one thing you maybe left out or didn't note - there is no restriction on flights over public (non-private) lands. Nor should there be unless there is a TFR or permanent flight restriction in place (national parks, etc.).

What do you mean by broadcast? That is not a part of the NPRM.

Currently all of my vehicles are marked with my phone number and HAM license number. I'm thinking of including as well a url that can take you straight to the details of the vehicle. and once they are registered they will have their N- tail number visibly displayed as best as possible.

But otherwise you are correct - no legit commercial operator would have any problem with these regs. and we do not. The problem is these regulations do nothing for the problems DMT is noting. It is not the commercial operators that are buzzing manned vehicles or interfering with FD ops. It's a small fraction of douc hebag idiots hobbyist idiots. And that's a complete and different set of rules. Good news there is (and I've already noted) that's something our legislators are dealing with. And as slow as they move the FAA is even slower. yay me. phhhhhpt.

We are listing our Safety guidelines on our site. I've got it web authenticated so no direct link but so far this is what we have:


Safety is objective #1 on every single mission we fly. With this in mind we've developed an aggressive safety protocol to follow to insure we maintain the best safety standards and practices available. Pre and post flight equipment inspection, constant flight testing and a strict adherence to current and proposed FAA guidelines are just a few of the ways we strive to emphasize safety and successful objective accomplishment, every time we put a vehicle in the air.

FAA guideline compliance
Pre and Post Flight Inspections
Regular Flight Log and Telemetry Reviews
Proactive Flight Path Briefings
Constant Telemetry and state of the art controller systems
Dedicated Camera Operators and Spotters for additional pilot support
Constant Flight and Safety Testing
Certified, Experienced, and Insured Pilots
Standardized Fleet components
Specifically our safety guidelines are:

Our vehicles are less than 25 kg AGW
We fly only visual line-of-site (VLOS) missions (operator or observer)
At no time are our vehicles operated over persons not directly involved in the mission
We operate only during daylight hours
We grant right-of-way to all other aircraft (manned or unmanned)
Vehicles fly at no greater than a maximum speed of 100mph
Vehicles stay below 200 feet above ground level (AGL)

For additional information on our Safety Program, or for an onsite consultation and review of your personal or company safety practices, please feel free to contact us at safety@aerialphoto.com


some of that needs to change as we wrote that before we committed to getting our exemption. the rules are a little tighter now.

and if you are curious as to what the exemptions look like and how the FAA spells it out for us you can review any of these:
https://www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section_333/333_authorizations/

we're two months before ours will be there.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 23, 2015 - 08:56am PT
And you now trust the media? The great skeptic dingus, not only trusting them, but propagating it, lol, like a little dancing monkey..

Do you know what the reports for RC hobby aircraft are? not drones? for like the last 80 years? It's a horrible record, did you ever care? They actually never reported on them before that buzz word (drone) entered the picture, now the media has you all riled up like a big sucker (fox news potato)...congrats man...
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 23, 2015 - 08:58am PT
While the drone sporting world explodes, you wanna worry about the hammer..

It's like bitching about no drilling in the wilderness and trying to ban all rotary electric tools to stop it...you just look retarded..

jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Jul 23, 2015 - 09:00am PT
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 23, 2015 - 09:48am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 23, 2015 - 09:51am PT
TLP, that's right on.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 23, 2015 - 01:08pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 24, 2015 - 12:06pm PT
Let's see here...

It's illegal to fly drones over fires...

Dumb-ass flies drone over fire...

Nothing is done to catch him or stop him...they just ground all ops

Why even have laws if they don't enforce them? If some dumb-ass, and we know he's dumb because no one I know in the FPV community would do such a thing to risk headlines like that, could it be assumed the "dumb-ass" is smarter than those who are there to enforce the existing laws to prevent it from happening? Because I would have to assume, that the real dumb-asses are the ones who cannot enforce their existing laws on dumb-asses...because they are technically inferior and have no right governing that which they are incompetent about..which leads me to the source of your news..incompetence and ignorance being aggravated by dumb-ass...it's really one big sh#t show, but you're the sucker who is diving in and splashing around in it, instead of seeing it for what it is, revolutionary chaos...lol

Also, just a side note. There hasn't been any publicized prove of any of these "sightings"...just saying...please find me some before you continue..

Oh and the kid who put a gun on one, didn't get arrested for it, he was arrested for being a dumbass in an unrelated incident, but you go believing those headlines like a good sheep dingus..

while you do that, I'm planning some of the worlds largest drone events and changing history, lol. some people do, while others just sit and bitch...which are you?
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 24, 2015 - 12:17pm PT
I'm planning some of the worlds largest drone events and changing history,

If you do say say so, yourself: history cuts both ways. While I see value in drones for
agriculture, forestry, and law enforcement (a double-edged sword to be sure) I'm drawing a
blank on anything else that might prove worthwhile to me. Do enlighten us.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 24, 2015 - 12:53pm PT

its clear we are going to have to regulate these people. They will not regulate themselves. Same old story.

There's full and complete regulation and laws governing the airspace over fires...what more can we do? It is completely regulated as it is..you are asking for ice cream when you are holding a sundae...you need to turn your emotion and focus to where it belongs and help us both out, hold our law enforcement responsible for not enacting the existing laws, plain and simple..they are making my community look bad and scaring your panties off..not to mention the full scale aircraft (reporting all this) are the very industry lobbying again drone use for fear of losing their jobs and existing industry, so I say again, show me proof of these flights...

Is the US immigration problem going to be fixed by making it more unlawful to come across borders? what does that even look like anyway? like a law with larger print? Maybe capitol letters and some bold writing to make sure people know we mean it this time? your an idiot dingus..

You are basically saying we need to keep new bolts from going in, by taking everyone's hammer...just because you are biased about this object in question does not give you the right to throw reason out the window...
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 24, 2015 - 01:00pm PT
If you do say say so, yourself: history cuts both ways. While I see value in drones for
agriculture, forestry, and law enforcement (a double-edged sword to be sure) I'm drawing a
blank on anything else that might prove worthwhile to me. Do enlighten us.

Events like this below are posed to be as big as the Xgames in the future..

[Click to View YouTube Video]

People use to think skateboards were pretty pointless too, for some people and for an entire industry, doing tricks with them pays the bills (on TV even)..Drones are a new medium (and one of the best to come along) for any number of things, including recreation...I know this is hard to understand, swallow and envision...but trust me...the generations coming behind us have embraced them in ways we could have never foresaw..
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 24, 2015 - 01:08pm PT
99.9% of all pilots do police themselves. it's the .1% that's the problem. DMT is right - same old story. doesn't matter if it's guns, climbing, or drones - there's always that minority fraction. I feel sorry for him and people like him. Horribly upset about something he cannot control. and as the industry grows and they become more prevalent then what? stroke? high blood pressure? people make their choices and that's their deal. But I do hope DMT knows I've always liked and appreciated his contributions. In this case I just think he is misguided.

BTW... the kid with the gun on the drone got arrested. not for the that incident but for something else. that kid concerns me. out on a $20k bond.


on another note I finally got around to running my survey of Voo camp through Open Drone Map. not the best results. lots of holes in the ortho. Monkey Boy says he can fix it. I'm sure he can cuz he's a genius and i'm just a hack.


and I don't know what to tell you Reilly... the racers are just having fun. How's that harming you or anyone? they race in private places and are insured and I'll wager a bet that 99.9% are responsible fliers. Let them have their fun, no?


digressing even more...

last week I want to Tacoma for my B-Day. I flew at Fort Steilacoom. Until monday it was illegal to fly in an area that is very open and very isolated. City council approved the area for flying. The next day two of the lead guys on pushing that through got "busted" for flying there. Some woman reported they flew over her which they claim they did not (and I believe them). So an officer who is also a pilot came out to have a talk with them. After about 10 minutes the woman who reported them was seen by the officer with her dog off leash. She got a ticket. Bwaaahahahahaha.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jul 24, 2015 - 01:10pm PT
Ban life.

It's that pesky life that living things have that causes no end of problems for other living things.

When non-living things are all that's left, all problems will disappear.

If you don't have the guts to REALLY take the high road, then all complaints and "fixes" are really just pandering half-measures that can only lead to more problems and complaints and "fixes." Rinse and repeat.

Ban LIFE or quit complaining and "fixing."
overwatch

climber
Jul 24, 2015 - 01:57pm PT
Squishy is right, it is just like with cell phones, there are already distraction while driving laws on the books that the cops could use to regulate cell phone use while driving instead of making a big deal to come up with some new law. Enforce what we've already got.

That said though some of squishy's verbiage in his posts doesn't really seem designed to engender support.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jul 24, 2015 - 03:52pm PT
If it's not a drone, it's a gunman. If it's not a gunman, it's a knife-wielding psycho.

Or it's a negligent, drunk, or texting driver.

Or it's lung cancer from second-hand smoke.

Or it's a bad rap anchor.

Or it's a slip and fall accident.

Or it's an unlucky fall on an "easy" lead.

Or it's equipment failure at the gym.

Or it's skin cancer.

Or it's WHATEVER other thing you never saw coming, despite your best efforts.

Life is a terminal disease. The expectation of "safety" or even predictability has us wringing our hands when "things don't go right," as if we have any good reason to expect that things will "go right." The fact that they often/usually do go as we expect does not justify the inference to future expectations nor to hand-wringing. Whatever gets "fixed" just opens the door to something else taking people out in unexpected ways.

Take TSA checkpoints at the airports. Ridiculous! I mean, downright absurd!


95% failure rate at catching potential problems, and if I was planning to take out tons of people, I wouldn't even TRY to get anything past the checkpoint. My "target audience" would be gathered in countless choke points all over the country, as the picture shows. A terrorist would be stupid to try to get a bomb past TSA, even though his/her odds of succeeding would be VERY high! Instead, you go for the non-checkpointed choke points that are forced BY the checkpoints themselves.

Then what? How do you "fix" that threat? Have a checkpoint PRIOR to the TSA checkpoint? Okay... new choke point. Rinse and repeat.

There IS no safety, and the "fixing" is ALWAYS done AFTER an incident, which just produces the potential for a new and different incident.

Please, seriously, quit complaining and "fixing" things. Let's leave a TINY SHRED of real freedom (along with individual responsibility) before I die. Once I'm gone, feel free to "fix," legislate, and "solve" everything you wish.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 24, 2015 - 03:55pm PT
BAN CELL PHONES. it's not a matter of if but when someone will get killed while texting.

And when they do I'm going to return here and give an emphatic "I TOLD YOU SO!".

cuz, you know, it's your fault those people died.
ladyscarlett

Trad climber
SF Bay Area, California
Jul 24, 2015 - 04:55pm PT
Sh#t damn! DMT sure has been grumpy since he started tapping the LScarlett!! Maybe pump the brakes for a while big guy and go fly a drone or something, nawmean??

And I should know, CIRJB!!!!!!!!!!9988!!!!!1111


HAHAHA! Aw man, you have not been reading enough DMT if you think he's been grumpy since he's been 'tapping' LScarlett!

He's been gifted with the grump far far longer than that. From what I've observed, nothing brings it out like the Taco!

You WISH you could blame it all on a woman. Nope, gender has nothing to do with it this time...

It's all you boys!

Cheers

LS

ps - maybe it's because he misses climbing?
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 24, 2015 - 05:05pm PT
Nope, gender has nothing to do with it this time...


If IRJB sez it's that way then it's just that way.

Those the rules - click Terms of Services and it's in there somewhere ;-)


sounds like you are somehow involved with UAVs? if so, mind sharing how?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Jul 24, 2015 - 08:49pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]

squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 25, 2015 - 09:27pm PT
That said though some of squishy's verbiage in his posts doesn't really seem designed to engender support.

That's just to troll dingus...someone has too..
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 25, 2015 - 09:31pm PT
And I'm all good with support..

We have international news propagating every day into new audiences..

Oh and if one little race has your panties in a bunch, just you wait: http://droneworlds.com/
couchmaster

climber
Jul 26, 2015 - 08:54am PT


Wow, I hadn't read this thread cause I figured it would be the usual Monkeyslingingcrapatthebars style of prose. I was wrong. Lots of good and interesting info from everyone.

Thanks!



DMT, the Engine makers test their product design by throwing frozen poultry into the spinning fan blades to make sure the engines don't disintegrate. Of the millions of birds out flying around, it takes a bunch of them to get sucked into the engine all at one time to get a plane down. It's super rare although there are flocks of birds all over out there. Given the millions of birds out there, vs the 100's of drones, I think your angst is misplaced. I routinely see the huge Pterodactyl-like Great Blue herons at our airport. They can't make them stop hunting there although they do have visible cannon like noisemakers.

Ban birds, not drones.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 27, 2015 - 09:52am PT
Instead of wasting time online...go find the guys responsible and earn $75,000...

overwatch

climber
Jul 27, 2015 - 10:08am PT
you have more time invested in this thread than anyone else
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 27, 2015 - 11:09am PT
do you have a link to that squishy?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Jul 27, 2015 - 11:34am PT
Instead of wasting time online...go find the guys responsible and earn $75,000...


I bet it was a driver who's car was stuck on the freeway..


what about the tow truck drivers and the amount they charged each driver..
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 27, 2015 - 11:44am PT
you have more time invested in this thread than anyone else

Yup...because it's something I'm passionate about and fight for, hence my involvement with the national competition, AMA, FAA and FCC...

My passion for it comes from the freedom and feelings of flight. I have no problem spending time explaining it, it is not a waste of time for me, I enjoy spreading the news about drones and fighting ignorance on the subject..

"There is no sport equal to that which aviators enjoy while being carried through the air on great white wings." — Wilbur Wright
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 27, 2015 - 12:19pm PT
Will, it should be obvious why he noted the AMA. As far as the FCC goes we're required to have at least a technical to operate in FPV or in the 433Mhz band (which I do for my radio). The FAA is also the ones with the long term mission of writing the regs for all of us.

and though no squishy may not be a pilot I'm starting my pilots training this week specifically because of this industry.

jus' sayin'
overwatch

climber
Jul 27, 2015 - 12:24pm PT
Cracking me up, hecapsyainurdumper
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 27, 2015 - 12:32pm PT
That's where you are wrong. The mindset and immersion of flying a drone at high speed requires you to be there in your mind and "feel" the flight, without doing so you will not be successful. This may look easy, but trust me, you cannot just walk up grab a TX and do it. I have trained FAA licensed pilots to do this and they say it's harder than flying a real aircraft and it's harder than flying a traditional line of sight RC airplane as well...Keep in mind we actually fly our craft, those seen in the news media causing trouble are GPS guided noob bots that any tom, dick or harry can buy at Frys and cause trouble with. The drone community I am apart of, hates the accessibility of such craft and the fact that it takes no skill to pilot (guide) them.

Granted we are sitting safety on the ground when we fly, but it ain't a video game either, there's no re-spawning, the air is real, the physics are real and the immersion makes it very real..

Have you ever tried to explain to someone why you climb? Or what those moments on the wall "feel" like, that forced mediation to hide the fear inside? Well, trying to explain the feeling of flying these craft is about as hard as explaining that, and I know you understand that..surfers have to go through the same problem...this is all about the ride...trust me, it's awesome and worth it, I wish I could take you all for a ride to show you..

Here's some of my personal videos as example...but they do not do it justice..you gotta put the goggles on..

[Click to View YouTube Video]

[Click to View YouTube Video]

[Click to View YouTube Video]

We wait till golden hour when the light is right, we watch the weather for stability, wind and high lift days..we design and hot-wire cut our own wings, build our own power systems and hand made antennas...we watch the RF noise floor and we coordinate a narrow range of RF channels so we can do it together in groups, just for a few moments of "the freedom of flight". Of all the communities in this world, the traditional rock climbing tribe should get it...it's an exercise in futility for an experience...

jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Jul 27, 2015 - 12:37pm PT
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 27, 2015 - 01:11pm PT
An aviator, is what I am, measured by the English definition of the word...lol...

I also use the very same airspace as those you define as aviators. I am also a free citizen of the US and have every right to that airspace as they. Regulation must accommodate me, safety, as much as it accommodates all users...such is the American way..

Common sense regulation will be a reality, but drones and pilots of drones like myself will not be banned. In fact we usher in the next technological revolution that will build jobs and industry giving the US a chance to excel. Thus far, we have failed. Mostly because throw backs have a problem with the word "drone"...While France, Germany, China, Australia, even countries in Africa are beating us in the drone industry...think about that a moment...we are the losers right now, collectively...in a new revolution that some of you fail to even acknowledge or have any knowledge of...and it's been going on for about 10 years under your noses...discussions like this, in new audiences, is what the drone pilots need to do. We need to stop the stupid consumers of noob drones at walmart from ruining it for those who know what they are doing, I welcome regulation and want it, but not if it infringes on my rights to further the technology and uses of the tool.

squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 27, 2015 - 01:15pm PT
Yesterday a DJI Inspire (ready to fly noob drone for photgraphers) flew over me in the federal wilderness. If I knew where the pilot was and got his name I would have reported him to my buddy's at the FAA.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 27, 2015 - 01:30pm PT
Cessna 172. I start Wednesday.

solo tri-leg cross country flight is required so maybe i'll stop by. I'll bring my big rig and no, you can't shoot at it :-). Maybe it'll have the FLIR aboard. that's going to prove to be an incredibly useful tool.

squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 27, 2015 - 01:39pm PT
nice sar rig dude! Is it a Tarot? I built a few Tarots now and I like them...nothing to complain about...
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 27, 2015 - 02:03pm PT
It's a Tarot 680 with extended motor mounts so it comes in around 810mm. Arris 4010/370kvs, luminear 30a optos, and I get about 25 minutes with no payload on a 10aH 6s. Pixhawk/3DR electronics. EzUHF diversity. 600mw vtx, minim, telemetry, 3 camera switch.

It's going to be a great SAR rig as well as solar inspection, roof top, etc.

It'll lift 10 lbs easy.

we call it The Beast but a friend built this and well.... yeah, not so much.


Those are 28" blades. It's built to carry a 9 pound LIDAR unit for 40 minutes.

And if there is a build built that'll make a phantom look like a toy it's that Table Top. only around $5K to build w/o the LIDAR. Pixy based as well.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 27, 2015 - 03:50pm PT
Man those things crash too hard for my blood...I break props, not my wallet, lol...
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 27, 2015 - 04:24pm PT
I. DON'T. CRASH. ;-)

except for the porta-quad that Deucey invented that's mostly true.

Been trying to fpv that thing around - through trees and what not. I've broken too many props and that bugs me.

*knock*
ß Î Ø T Ç H

Boulder climber
Shitalkqua, WA
Jul 27, 2015 - 09:40pm PT
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 28, 2015 - 10:02am PT



nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 28, 2015 - 02:31pm PT

I know the other two Mission Ready guys on the map
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 28, 2015 - 09:55pm PT
oh lookie here... another hero for the anti-drone and git yer gun crowd.

http://www.wdrb.com/story/29650818/louisville-man-arrested-for-shooting-down-drone

he sure does look good in orange wouldn't you say?


laughing at the jailbird aside it does appear the operators we're douch ebags as well.

popcorn, more popcorn. and cowbell.
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jul 29, 2015 - 07:30am PT
From the link:
"It was just hovering above our house and it stayed for a few moments and then she finally waved and it took off," said neighbor Kim VanMeter.

VanMeter has a 16-year-old daughter who lays out at their pool. She says a drone hovering with a camera is creepy and weird.

"I just think you should have privacy in your own backyard," she said.

Merideth agrees and said he had to go see for himself.

“Well, I came out and it was down by the neighbor’s house, about 10 feet off the ground, looking under their canopy that they’ve got under their back yard," Merideth said. "I went and got my shotgun and I said, ‘I’m not going to do anything unless it’s directly over my property.’"

That moment soon arrived, he said.

"Within a minute or so, here it came," he said. "It was hovering over top of my property, and I shot it out of the sky."

"I didn't shoot across the road, I didn't shoot across my neighbor's fences, I shot directly into the air," he added.

Good for him. This is how drones are being marketed.
[Click to View YouTube Video]

Isn't that just hilarious?
overwatch

climber
Jul 29, 2015 - 07:47am PT
high-tech variation of a mirror on the shoe
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jul 29, 2015 - 08:34am PT
I may have to ask Ron A to sell me a shotgun!

Would rock salt do the job? I'd be wary of buckshot.

squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 29, 2015 - 09:31am PT
If you didn't know that video was faked, you got bigger issues here man, lol
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jul 29, 2015 - 09:35am PT
I like the idea up-thread of using a fishing rod to cast a line over the drone.

Shotgun guy should have done that.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 29, 2015 - 09:36am PT
there's already anti drone drones that shoot nets onto other drones..and the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a drone, is a good guy with a drone...
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jul 29, 2015 - 10:10am PT
The last thing we need is DMT with a firearm!

Shooting at drones is stupid. When the drone will be designed to get you there is no way you will take it out by shooting back.

http://observer.com/2014/09/cyborg-unplug-is-a-personal-jammer-against-drones-glas#@&%es/

http://droningskies.com/good-news-drone-radio-frequency-jammers-are-against-the-law/

So jammers may be against the law? Jamming is where it's at!
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jul 29, 2015 - 12:18pm PT
If you didn't know that video was faked, you got bigger issues here man, lol

The point is that's the market they're after. lol
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 29, 2015 - 12:26pm PT
I work in and with the industry shakers, believe me, that's not the audience they are after...

They are currently working through the makers and tech world still...
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 30, 2015 - 11:51am PT
Question for you 'git yer shotguns' guys -

if a drone is 270 feet above you will you be able to knock it out of the sky with your shot gun? If so, what gauge/load might you be shooting?

I've shot skeet a little bit but it was typical skeet range.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 30, 2015 - 12:26pm PT
http://www.wdrb.com/story/29670583/update-drone-owner-disputes-suspects-claims-produces-video-claiming-to-show-flight-path
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 30, 2015 - 12:49pm PT
don't blow my cover man! ;-)


oooppps... that pesky data that gets in the way of a good lie
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 31, 2015 - 09:27am PT
lol...well...sorry to burst this for you...but elevation telemetry data on drones is not very accurate and usually is just a reference to where it took off, not it's true height.. I have seen more than enough baro readings on those boards to say they cannot be trusted. I'm not saying that's the case here, but we much acknowledge that fact too..

I had a naza that would never take off because it always thought it was under ground and the safety code kept it from arming. I had to disable it for the client.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Jul 31, 2015 - 10:52am PT
For any legislation related to this stuff- just considering a vertical plane above a person's property line would be an overly simplistic and insufficient way of measuring a person's reasonable expectation of privacy in their own home, let alone outside in their back yard.

A couple of weeks ago I had a drone hovering in front of the balcony of my house, definitely not more than 30-50 feet horizontally away and 10-20 feet higher, sometimes level with my house. No other ground-based person would ever have this view because I'm on the top of a hill, with a line of site over all the houses below mine. I normally feel comfortable being naked in my living room or bedroom, and only someone with a telescope spotting from half a mile away could make a line of site into a small part of my living room. This drone would have a very clear view looking in to all parts of my living room and bedroom. Should I need to buy curtains because drones have a right to hang out there?

They can do it without technically crossing my property line, just by hovering off to the side in an adjacent property.

So any laws about privacy zones in proximity to private property should be written with something like an inverted cone or pyramid like controlled airspace around airports. The idea is not to protect take-off and landing paths, but to restrict line-of-site views from within a certain physical distance. Of course powerful large optical lenses added to drones will still be able to skirt around the intents of the legislation, unless they make very conservative rules.
overwatch

climber
Jul 31, 2015 - 11:19am PT
I am not going back through this whole thread (talk about droning on) to find out maybe somebody already posted something but I would expect a response to the droners' right to fly with some kind of signal jammer similar to an EMP that just knocks them out of the sky without resort to firearms. you know it's coming if it's not already here.

the albatross

Gym climber
Flagstaff
Jul 31, 2015 - 06:39pm PT
Not sure if this has been posted or not on this thread, an interesting perspective with video on the drones which are harassing wildland firefighting aircraft (includes threats of prosecution for murder). Just home from a fire assignment up in Oregon, where a drone was spotted hovering over a wildfire. Please, if you own drones, do not be idiotic enough to use them around emergency situations without proper authorization.


http://www.myfoxla.com/story/29665536/a-pilots-view-of-drones-from-the-cockpit#.Vbo-b_Dqjhc.facebook


Until recently Captain Ryan Hales never worried about unmanned aerial vehicles - also known as drones. But, now, as he flies over wildfires to drop chemical retardant, he not only worries about watching for other aircraft, birds and thick drifting smoke, he thinks about the drones that might be out there. Another risk he describes as "huge" and worrisome.

San Bernardino County officials are cracking down on illegal drone operations. Supervisors are offering a hefty $75,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of those who interrupted firefighting operations by flying drones during the North, Mill 2 and Lake fires.

RELATED: A Forest Service Pilot Speaks Out on Drone Dangers

Supervisor James Ramos says, "We have asked drone operators to keep their drones away from the fires. They have ignored us. They know their drones are putting lives at risk."

When asked about shooting down drones Sheriff John McMahon says it depends on the altitude and position of the craft. "It's a possibility," he adds.

Meanwhile, District Attorney Mike Ramos is blunt when he says to drone operators, "I just want you to know that if an intentional act of a drone was to cause one of these wonderful men and women fighting fires to go down and be injured or worse scenario killed... or another civilian on the ground .. we will prosecute you for murder."

Chewybacca

Trad climber
Kelly Morgan, Whitefish MT
Jul 31, 2015 - 08:50pm PT
Hey Squishy. Thanks for your comments here. I support responsible use of drones.

I've spent a fair amount of time in manned rotary winged aircraft and once had the experience of an auto-rotation landing (possibly the most helpless feeling I've ever had).

My question, are multi-prop drones capable of a relatively controlled landing if they lose power?
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jul 31, 2015 - 10:12pm PT
Drone ( shadow is seen in lower-edge, center-left on the first shot )

That's on my list. Kites are legal in National Parks / Wilderness.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 1, 2015 - 09:32am PT
My question, are multi-prop drones capable of a relatively controlled landing if they lose power?

no - it falls out of the sky like a rag doll. which in a sense is a good thing since that's really what you want (rather then it having any horizontal component which is unpredictable).

If a quad loses one motor it can no longer fly. a hex, octo or X8 will continue to fly and depending on the controller you might not even notice. it might also rotate as there's an even number of clockwise and counter-clockwise rotating motors so if you take one out it'll want to yaw.

I flew around this morning. was a lovely day to be up in the air. didn't see a single drone. In fact all the pilots/instructors at the airport are really interested in seeing the technology so i'll probably do a demo in a couple weeks at their friday afternoon BBQ



in those photos in the first one you can see the white controller in the guys hand. f*#king phantom owners. f*#kers flying in the park. too bad the POS didn't loose power and take the 3000' freefall and end up in a million pieces. asshats.
i'm gumby dammit

Sport climber
da ow
Aug 4, 2015 - 12:16am PT
I like to fly, but if some drone invades my space without my permission, you know whats going to happen.

Yeah we know. You'll take it out like it's a can of biscuits.
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 4, 2015 - 09:50am PT
wow thanks for the creative and original input, you scare monger...look at what you have become, over another subject, so biased..it's likes a subjective autism...unable to transcend...

I can throw out links and quotes too, so what?

Time Mag: http://time.com/3975103/robotic-sports-nfl/?xid=fbshare

and check this out bro!! http://droneworlds.com/

Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 4, 2015 - 10:05am PT
Squishy, get real. There is or are some lunatics loose who are endangering
the lives of hundreds of people. If you can't admit that then you have issues.
This isn't some fun little video game.
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 4, 2015 - 10:09am PT
If what you say is true, why are they not being caught or sought? Don't we have existing laws against such things?

Basically what you are painting for me is that we have laws that we cannot enforce..It's like saying "stop or I'll shoot" when you lack a gun...right?

I agree there might be some stupid people out there doing dumb things. Have I advocated once to not stopping them? I say go stop them, it's the people doing it..banning drones will do nothing to solve your problem..
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Aug 4, 2015 - 11:12am PT
Maybe they should start enforcing existing laws.

"Attempting to interfere with the operation of an aircraft" is already a felony. You can get twenty years for it.

This ass hole got fourteen years in the Federal Joint:

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/03/11/california-man-walloped-with-14-year-sentence-for-shining-laser-at-helicopter

His thing was shining lasers at aircraft. Fourteen years seems light to me.

The Feds can hit renegade drone pilots with the same shithammer, if they want. But it's more fun to be a Star, and go Hollywood with TV *press conferences*, whining about how there ought to be a law, than it is to just do their damn job with the tools we've already given them.

The "first responders" are great at busting idiots who shine lasers at them. Google "point lasers at planes arrests", and you'll mostly find stories about fools pointing lasers at police helicopters. The cops take it very seriously when they're the victim, not so much when non-cops are victims.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 4, 2015 - 12:16pm PT
cops take it very seriously when they're the victim, not so much when non-cops are victims.

You're probably onto something there, Chaz.
big ears

Trad climber
?
Aug 4, 2015 - 05:17pm PT
Smuggling drugs...... Can't decide if this is a pro drone argument or anti drone argument lol

http://www.vice.com/read/a-drone-dropped-a-bunch-of-drugs-in-an-ohio-prison-yard-ending-in-chaos-vgtrn-999?utm_souce=vicefbus
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 4, 2015 - 06:06pm PT
^^^^ Hey! I have an idea. Let's do the same with guns.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 4, 2015 - 06:19pm PT
Truth is DMT none of that will ever happen. Ever. Not for the hobbiest.

But here's a good read for you. This is are the conditions set forth in current 333 Exemptions by the FAA allowing for commercial operations. Sorry for the long read.

Conditions and Limitations
In this grant of exemption, Kentucky Windage UAV, LLC is hereafter referred to as
the operator.
Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be
grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.
1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the AgEagle Robotic
Aircraft System when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed
operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this
exemption.
2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are
not permitted.
3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The
exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine
compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at
airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the
aircraft manufacturer.
4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level
(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.
5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times.
This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than
corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or
U.S. driver’s license.
6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within
the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used
to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS
capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times;
electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC
must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the
duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties
required of the VO.
7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its
operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of
4
exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating
documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the
Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and
limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents,
the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed.
Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating
documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the
operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised
documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The
operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension
or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update
or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then
the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s
UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding
updates or revisions to the operating documents.
8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation
or flight characteristics, e.g., replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo
a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption.
Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at
least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such
a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.
9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is
in a condition for safe operation.
10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the
UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre-flight inspection must account for all
potential discrepancies, e.g., inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the
inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is
prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the
UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.
11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul,
replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and
aircraft components.
12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer
safety bulletins.
13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport,
commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a
current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a
state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal
5
government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in
14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.
14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the
ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be
operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and
maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC
qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with
14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs
(training, proficiency, and experience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to
safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated
under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However,
training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During
training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for
flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA
with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.
15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All
operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights
under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.
16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as
denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not
denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current
FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s
management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption
holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available
to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.
17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet
horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.
18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a
pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property.
19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.
20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast
weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the
intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve
power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.
21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All
operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA. The
6
exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct
operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA.
22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial
number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification
(N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must
be as large as practicable.
23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and
any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the
PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating.
These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement
official upon request.
24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and
activities at all times.
25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.
26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating
persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:
a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons
from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure
that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises
where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of
the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety
of nonparticipating persons; and
b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission
for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of
the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not
present an undue hazard.
The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered
nonparticipating persons under this exemption.
27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with
permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative.
Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be
obtained for each flight to be conducted.
28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical
boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported
to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be
7
reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions
contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.
If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and
television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.
29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM)
as documented in this grant of exemption.
30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this
exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards
District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day
notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities
must include at least the following:
a. Dates and times for all flights;
b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted
under this grant of exemption;
c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of
the UAS;
d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used;
e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;
f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners
and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those
who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;
g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and
h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city,
town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes
essential to accomplish the operation.
31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons
consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the
exemption holder’s MPTOM.
Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS
operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to,
parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

And for what it's worth once the NRPM is finalized there will be less restrictions than set forth there (no pilots license required).

And though I'm sure you commented on the NRPM it is now closed to comments and expected to be finalized middle of next year.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 4, 2015 - 06:28pm PT
I think you fail to understand what is going on in the industry in my a*#essment. you say it's simple. I could not disagree more with that "simple" statement.

You do it not through regulations. You do it by stiffening the laws. The regulations are not going to happen the way you put forth. No matter the "backlash".

And your characterization of squish is pretty wrong as well.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 4, 2015 - 09:52pm PT
Nature, what's the ratio of 'responsible flyers' to nutjobs? Yes, like guns, it doesn't matter.
What's wrong with requiring a unique ID # and a transponder on every one sold? Yeah,
the transponder could be turned off and the numbers ground off but then only criminals would
do that.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 5, 2015 - 07:23am PT
How many of you read my long post above? Before you make comments on what should be done I suggest you get the heartbeat on what is being done. As far as commercial operations go that is what is being done and that is not about to change. In fact once the NRPM is passed the regs will soften. For instance, we will not be required to have a PPL as we do now.

to answer your question Reilly, first you should refer to a post I made way up thread.

For group 1 the ratio is infinite. Zero:Everyone
Group number 2 - same ratio. Zero:Everyone
Group number 3 - not infinite because this is the group where the f*#ktards that do stupid sh#t are. I can't even take a guess on the ratio but it really doesn't matter as we know there is more than zero. Which is the problem.

Although i suppose a case can be made for another group where the ratio is 1:1 - the terrorists plotting to use this technology to try to commit major crimes against humanity.

The old school AMA guys wrote the book on ethical flying. They are all responsible. The commercial operators like myself are not going to do stupid sh#t because our lively hood is on the line. it's the kids with the toy (actually, it's more often dumb sh#t adults but I digress) that is doing this sh#t.

But the ones that are going to attempt to commit the heinous crimes
- the terrorists - no regulations or transponders or laws or anything are going to deter them.

You propose a transponder on all units sold but do you really think you're going to get China to get behind that? Because that's where DJI is based and those remain the most popular units sold. Second are vehicles sold by the surrender monkeys - the French. And in fact most units sold are not even sold in the United States. So now you will be proposing global laws? good luck with that.

In the below photo are three vehicles. Take a guess on which one of these has a serial number and which ones does knot.


The white one has a serial number. The others do not. The reason for that is simple. The white one - a DJI Phantom - was sold as a unit. The other two were built from parts that were acquired from all over the world. Thus they couldn't be sold with a transponder since they were not sold as unit in the first place. Thus the idea of scratching off the number and removing the transponder is moot.

I point that out to say that that if a terrorist wants to do something with an army of drones they are not going down to the local hobby shop and buying a bunch of phantoms. they will buy or make all the parts they need.

Now at the end of the day one of these units will have an N number (tail number) and will be registered with the FAA as an experimental vehicle. It'll be The Table with 28" props. That vehicle by the way was built to carry a LIDAR unit to do commercial mapping. I saw it fly the other day and it's scary. I found myself walking backwards. those props will kill you.

For my vehicles that are registered I'm required to have the N number visible - 2" letters/numbers, I'm required to have 'experimental' displayed. and I'm also required to have my HAM license number displayed. Further, since I build my own i have to created and inscribe a serial number which the FAA has recorded. But here's the thing - that won't matter. It'll never be an issue unless the GPS goes wonky and the thing flies away and then hopefully it'll be found and tracked back to me and hopefully returned. and it certainly will not be an issue with respect to some nefarious act.

Here's a question for you Reilly - how big are transponders? Can I get one that is say less than 10 grams and is very small? I assume not (and i really don't know - I'm asking a sincere question).

I've no doubt as all of you that there will be a strike. But I'll bet a six pack that the first one does not happen in the US. my money, erm, beer, is on Heathrow airport. All the laws you propose make no difference once you leave our borders. So again, global laws? And to those that state these are the bane of humanity and never should have been allowed to come into existence good luck with that as well. Good luck telling China what they can and cannot do. Because China is where this started in so many ways and China is where most of the parts are made.

My teacher offers a very important lesson - wish for what is possible. I read DMTs post on how "simple" it is and go ' yeah, um no, not happening'. it's not simple. it's not simple because it's not possible. It's not going to happen. And I'm not offering my opinion on if at the core it's a good idea or not. It's not practical just like I feel transponders are not practical.

Here's an example of an incident that pisses me off and shows just how far we have to go. There were two news helicopters flying a scene when some f*#ktard drone operator started playing chase with them. The guys aboard the choppers were pissed as they should have been. They followed the drone until it landed, watched the guy pick it up and take it to his house. Should be easy from here, right? The police show up and and ask the woman who answered the door if anyone inside owned a drone. She responded "No" and the police left. NOTHING happened to this mother f*#ker. We can't even get laws on the books and enforce them to make pieces of sh#t like that pay for their crime. So to propose what DMT does I just go "no, ain't happening". Also the vehicle he was flying he (or a friend?) built - it wasn't a phantom.

Wish for what is possible guys and put your energy there I suppose is what i'm saying. I'm not arguing that something is going to happen. I see it more than you guys do because i read the news daily. I've no choice as I've chosen this path. A path to be a commercial operator and also a path to be an ambassador. Squishy has done the same just in a different area.

oh and Reilly... i didn't realize you had a ton of avionics knowledge. Cool. And, by the way, Power off stalls are a f*#king RiOT!
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 5, 2015 - 09:14am PT
I'm helping put on several drone races in the bay area and Sacramento in the next few months. I invite you to come and see for yourself...
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 5, 2015 - 09:35am PT
Nature, I'm glad there are guys like you out there. Sadly, you can't be cloned.
You're probably right that the first nefarious act will be in Europe.
I aver that the first fuktard event will be here.

"Power off stalls are a f*#king RiOT!"

Dude, power ON stalls are where it is at! They will put yer shiny side
down faster than you can say "SUPERTOPO!"
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 5, 2015 - 10:48am PT
yeah, we did a power on stall. When the right wing dipped hard things got exciting. It's only taken four lessons to realize I can land. Wheeew!

Another thing I wanted to note above is that DJI has geofencing turned on in the firmware and has no-fly areas configured as well as max AGL.
https://www.mapbox.com/drone/no-fly/

a good hacker can work their way around this but the point is that DJI is trying.


Still looking for answers on transponders as I really do not know much about them. But I'm assuming the size and power matters. in other words if I somehow had a transponder that weighed five grams and output a microwatt it wouldn't do much good, right? ATC would never pick it up. If that's true then it follows that you need a bigger and more powerful transponder for ATC to see it. How big are they? How much do they weigh? Because at a certain point if it's too big it's simply not practical to float it.

How much is a transponder?

My big bird - The Beast - weighs in at 1.8 Kilo with no battery and a gopro on a gimbal for payload. I get about 25 minutes of flight time. Start adding weight - lots of weight - and my flight time starts to approach just a couple minutes and thus renders any mission as non-practical/do-able.

Further to that DMT states all drones should have a transponder.
So this will then need a transponder?
or this?
or the next size up?

point is it's not so simple any longer.


another prediction: the first terrorist act attempt won't happen with multi-rotors. It'll happen with a fixed wing. Maybe something like this that a friend built:
This is made out of styrofoam board that you get at the dollar store. longer flight time and way more payload. A dollar for the air frame and another $25 for components.

squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 5, 2015 - 12:00pm PT
Fixed wing drones were the 1st in the hobby world, before multirotors...I was flying fixed wings via camera and live video feeds 5 years ago...it looks like some simple RC airplane action, but it ain't..

TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Aug 10, 2015 - 08:20am PT
Drone fishin'

[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 10, 2015 - 09:32am PT
I had a chance to go over recent footage this weekend and make a new sick edit...I dedicate this one to dingus...

[Click to View YouTube Video]
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Aug 10, 2015 - 11:21am PT
drone fishing that is some funny shit!
Trashman

Trad climber
SLC
Aug 10, 2015 - 11:32am PT
Would have been even funnier if it'd resulted in some nice splashdown footage.
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Aug 10, 2015 - 01:30pm PT
This gets
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Aug 10, 2015 - 01:31pm PT
Gets this! Drones Suck..
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 10, 2015 - 06:45pm PT
dumb drunk fisherman almost cost himself three grand with that one cast. he's lucky he didn't bring it down.

a better course of action might have been a simple beatdown of the douc hebag operator. less jail time. less expensive.
CA.Timothy

climber
California
Aug 10, 2015 - 06:51pm PT
dumb drunk fisherman almost cost himself three grand with that one cast. he's lucky he didn't bring it down

under what law/statue? just curious...

The precedent for prosecution for destruction of drones so far is related to people shooting them down. It is about discharging the firearm in a possibly unsafe way.

Is his cast equivalent to attempting to destroy a paparazzi camera?

EDIT: Dont bother answering nature. After reading some legal briefs and articles written by lawyers regarding the castle doctrine and robots, as well as trespassing and privacy rights in public, I have concluded that the legality is so unclear that no response you will give will clarify.

No way the dude gets in trouble.

I know there is no expectation of privacy in public. This is not the same. There is a line that is crossed and it is called harassment, which is what many drone operators are doing to people in public spaces.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Aug 10, 2015 - 07:41pm PT
dumb drunk fisherman

Well, he wasn't too drunk or dumb if he stuck that cast!
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 10, 2015 - 08:20pm PT
the operator was a douch ebag all the way. does he deserve to have his drone taken out of the sky? yeah, sure. though a good beating was probably in order.

Destruction of personal property is what the fisherman was looking at. That's a crime. No different than if I took a baseball bat and beat your camera to crap with it. Then there is the classification of the vehicle itself - FAA views it the same way as any other flying thing. That needs to change because it makes no sense. But taking down a plane I believe it's up to $500K fine and six years hard time.


So let's review here.

1) I'm in no way defending this particular operators mission

2) It was an excellent cast for sure

3) destruction of someones personal property is a crime

4) nothing the operator did was a crime

5) taking pictures in public is not a crime. This "argument" has been going on since cameras were invented - google it. You have no right to privacy in public. You can be photographed without permission. However, if it is for commercial use the person(s) being photographed must sign a model release. If they do not want them used then the images cannot be used commercially.

6) see point 1) - operator was a douch ebag for that flight

and CA - this guy got in trouble:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCvfdz-sWxw
he was facing destruction of personal property - jail time. The operators in this case settled and did not press charges so long as the drunk guy payed full price for the drone. That swat cost him $1500.

and DMT... don't go putting thoughts or ideas on me. None of the sh#t you said is correct about what I want. what the f*#k is wrong with you?

and on another note our petition for the FAA 333 exemption was submitted friday of last week. In about two months we should have it and will be in full commercial ops - legally.
CA.Timothy

climber
California
Aug 10, 2015 - 08:58pm PT
and CA - this guy got in trouble:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCvfdz-sWxw
he was facing destruction of personal property. The operators in this case settled and did not press charges so long as the drunk guy payed full price for the drone

did you even watch it? lol

He has not been charged and the owner said he will take the case to small claims court if he has to. re watch it.

do you have more updated info about the case that you didnt link to? cause otherwise you straight up lied about its content.


here is a good read regarding drones over your private land

https://gigaom.com/2014/10/01/can-you-shoot-down-a-drone-on-your-land-new-incident-raises-self-defense-questions/

EDIT

3) destruction of someones personal property is a crime

is it if the destruction occurs while said property is in the process of harassing the individual who destroys it? Seriously I dont know.


nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 10, 2015 - 09:12pm PT
lol... actually... no i didn't. too fast on the google i guess. there's another story about it around somewhere. lemme see if i can find it. was a more updated report.

is it if the destruction occurs while said property is in the process of harassing the individual who destroys it? Seriously I dont know.

I'll see if i can find it but you do have a right to defend yourself from an attack drone. At which point you can take it out. The article I read made it seem like you had to be fearful of bodily harm. Can I take out a Loud Harley because it's presence I fell is harassment?

I don't see that flight as harassment. Annoying sure. I'd never do that flight which is why I won't defend him. F*#king DJI operators.

i don't know either. but we're about to find out. sadly.

CA.Timothy

climber
California
Aug 10, 2015 - 09:21pm PT
The article I read made it seem like you had to be fearful of bodily harm.

That is the tradition I believe so I would agree with that. However from what I understand, drones are unprecedented still in a legal sense.

Drones are an issue because they instantly arrive without declaring intentions. Are you filming a timelapse video at the PB Pier for a grad project at SCRIPS? Or are you a weird voyeur doing homework for your skin suit? People can put guns on them now. Does that drone belong to a terrorist about to unload on me?

You see the dilemma?
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 10, 2015 - 09:26pm PT
Guns can be put on them, sure. But not legally. Wonder what happened to the kid. Probably still a work in progress.

as far as what the guy was doing at the pier i think it's pretty obvious but I could be wrong. He was an amateur with no understanding of ethical flight. SCRIPS is flying but could give a crap less about drunk fisherman.

and yes dingus - he was drunk. I say that cuz I'm a fisherman and I can't remember not having beer. maybe not drunk but guys like that... ugh. Not a fan of fisherman like that. I was diving this weekend and dropping in on wharf 2 in Monterey for some macroshot. some fisherman made a long cast close enough to me I didn't like it. f*#k that guy.

Total dickhead operator. It's hard to not enjoy the ending.
[Click to View YouTube Video]

There's many a dilemma. not sure how it'll play out. For the most part I don't care since I'm in a different category. The list of restrictions we're facing to operate commercially is what puts us there. These non-commercial, just got one for my birthday and it flies out of the box, are where the real trouble is. I hope the fad wears off.
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 11, 2015 - 09:02am PT
I see you trollin and hating..trying to make sense...no worries..



For the more intellectual in the audience, able to look beyond your own fear..here's some good info from the front lines of reality

http://drones.newamerica.org/primer/

http://norcalfpv.com/articles/drone-revolution

squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 11, 2015 - 09:36am PT
You are still, as nature has pointed out, mischaracterizing myself and others.

Let me quote myself from this very thread for our audience...

Jul 27, 2015 - 01:15pm PT
Yesterday a DJI Inspire (ready to fly noob drone for photgraphers) flew over me in the federal wilderness. If I knew where the pilot was and got his name I would have reported him to my buddys at the FAA.

When you have lost the logical argument, in front of the audience and know it, mischaracterizing your opposition is a good tactic, used often by FOX news...

I hate drones in the wilderness, and I hate slack liners as well, so what? I also advocate for the coming drone revolution and industry. That doesn't mean I support idiots dingus...I support a tool, nothing more...this simple simple fact, seems lost on you...and I fear simple may be beyond your understanding...scary considering the weight your words hold in this tribe...lol F%#^^@ scary..
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 11, 2015 - 09:38am PT
From Squishy's first 'intellectual' treatise:

Clear and secure rights to property—land, natural resources, and other goods and assets—are crucial to human prosperity. Most people lack such rights. That lack is in part a consequence of political and social breakdowns, and in part driven by informational deficits.

Uh, I fail to denote anything remotely 'intellectual' about that other than affected verbiage
rife with meaningless assumptions. So all those hungry people in Africa and Asia really
only need drones to free them from their "informational deficits"? Please.
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 11, 2015 - 09:44am PT
I am not the author (i wrote the 1st one). But it does go on to read..

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), also known as drones, by virtue of their aerial perspective, are able to gather large amounts of information cheaply and efficiently, as can unpowered aerial platforms like kites and balloons.

That information, in the form of images, maps, and other environmental data, can be used by communities to improve the quality and character of their property rights. These same tools are also useful in other, related aspects of global development. Drone surveillance can help conservationists to protect endangered wildlife and aid scientists in understanding the changing climate; drone imagery can be used by advocates and analysts to document and deter human rights violations; UAVs can be used by first responders to search for lost people or to evaluate the extent of damage after natural disasters like earthquakes or hurricanes.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 11, 2015 - 09:53am PT
I got to practice power on rolls today. and banking turn power off rolls.

it's still a RIOT.


and I didn't see one drone in our airspace. Though we were right below DIA airspace. guess i need to let of the yoke a little at times ;)
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 11, 2015 - 10:18am PT
Explain for me how my post in another thread about cathedral peak slack lining is related to anything here in this thread?
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 11, 2015 - 10:19am PT
oh now he is deleting posts, classic dingus...

just admit it, you are fail boat here and just need to go put on your big boy pants and look to the future without fear..
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 11, 2015 - 10:23am PT
Here, I'll even twist it a little for ya, cus the audience likes a good car crash..lol..remember dingus, how interesting train wrecks are?

http://www.copenhagenize.com/2011/02/anti-automobile-age-and-what-we-can.html
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 11, 2015 - 10:25am PT
No I'll let the gentle reader savor your words without editorial.

Talking to a perceived audience, classic you.

DMT

I love it...

You just decided to let the audience make up their own mind, and then in the next breath, discredited my statement that there is an audience, HAHAHAHAHA

I couldn't make this sh#t up...lol
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 11, 2015 - 11:06am PT
Aviator you say?
https://jethead.wordpress.com/2015/08/08/airliners-vs-drones-calm-down/
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 11, 2015 - 11:39am PT
oh that reminds me.. though I once again so no drones anywhere near our flight path we did take off with a large number of birds in front of us. it was my mad piloting skills that let us avoid them. Or it was their made birding skills that let them avoid us - either way - catastrophe avoided.

and c'mon squish... you know as well as i do it's only a matter of time before planes fall like flies and every one is being perv'd with loud upside down lawn mowers with tiny little cameras.
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 11, 2015 - 12:07pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
mucci

Trad climber
The pitch of Bagalaar above you
Aug 11, 2015 - 12:09pm PT
I was at Carlsbad beach this weekend.

Watched a drone crash into a lady on the head.

Her husband/ boyfriend stomped it out right there in front of 50 onlookers all cheering.

Drone dooch comes over and picks up the pieces.


He must have been a hobbyist, as no pilot would have let that happen, they are the pros after all.
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Aug 11, 2015 - 01:28pm PT
Squishy, after reading your link, it looks like the anti-auto people were right!

I was at Carlsbad beach this weekend.

Watched a drone crash into a lady on the head.

Obviously more hysteria! That could never happen!
mucci

Trad climber
The pitch of Bagalaar above you
Aug 11, 2015 - 01:55pm PT
It happened!

He was landing or power failure or whatever you drone dorks do when you gotta put it down.

Right on the head.

I wish I had a pic of the remnants....
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 11, 2015 - 02:29pm PT
If it looked like a drone you can buy, then it was not a hobbyist...it was a noob with a toy...I frequently call them, The Phantom Menace...named after the DJI Phantom they most likely try to fly (the white smooth one). If you ever see one of those things, you already know the pilot is a noob and has no idea what he is doing, you should keep your friends and family far from those people...if you want a villain, blame the companies making ready to fly drones, and turning the hobby into industry...even dingus can go to Frys right now with 600 bucks and do the same thing...or fly it in front of an airliner just to come back in this thread to make me eat crow...but a hobbyist, they are different, they will build design and program their own drone, mostly because they can and they are way better drones...I guess knowing is have the battle and you guys are very face value oriented...not all drones are alike..not all pilots share the same experience or perspective. And that is punctuated with contrast in this time of revolutionary chaos..
mucci

Trad climber
The pitch of Bagalaar above you
Aug 11, 2015 - 02:45pm PT
He must have been a hobbyist, as no pilot would have let that happen, they are the pros after all.

Now I know the proper terminology.

Store bought white drone = Noob
Hobbyist = makes his own drone
Pilot = Commercial use like Nature


This looked like a bigger one, not "out of the box" but I have seen tons of those white ones all over the beaches.

squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 11, 2015 - 02:47pm PT
difference is, I have been saying that from inside the "drone" community for 4 years (since before the RTF drones were released to the public)...and you are a charlatan with zero experience or perspective on the subject (safe for sitting as a passenger on too many planes)...talking like you know jack about it...to someone who does...that's my issue, not the subject at hand...but your piss poor attitude coupled with fear...it is a larger issue...for if you cannot educate yourself or at least be open to it, free from emotional or personal bias you have against me, then how valuable are any of your words on the subject? You may find, once you put that pile of false pride aside, that you and I agree on more things than we disagree on, and I bet that just rubs you wrong, so the audience gets a fun filled sh#t show...as I just sit back and point at the gorilla in the room..you are a sad emotional man dingus, ruled by pride and emotion, including fear..in this case you are more afraid of admitting I'm right, than of drones running into your jet engines...lol..
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 11, 2015 - 02:54pm PT
Pilot = Commercial use like Nature

I prefer to myself as an operator and many in the industry do the same. Though I was out flying this morning and training in a Cessna - that's when I'm a pilot. Tonight when i finally get to huck another bird (had my face in the water crushing at the shootout ;-) all weekend). I might try and get up super early and go some place dark and quiet and film Perseids. I'll probably just set my camera on a tripod and go that route however.

The AMA got started in about 1936 - those guys are the true hobbyists. They wrote the book on ethical flying. You don't hear about them because well... they wrote the book and follow their own rules.

not sure what to call the guys that get an RTF and fly it around people in places they simply shouldn't. dooche and/or noob works. DJI also makes a slightly bigger model that is mostly black so it could have been that.

But even that grouping isn't really fair. I know a lot of guys doing commercial ops and they fly phantoms and they do it safely. It's a good platform for floating a gopro so long as you fly ethically.

There certainly is something to be said about building your own. I may one day by the 3DR Solo which is RTF as a GoPro platform. But to date I've built all my own and certainly believe that instills responsibility.
bergbryce

climber
East Bay, CA
Aug 11, 2015 - 03:19pm PT
anyone see this?
if anyone knows this dude, give him a high five for me. bravo pier fisherman.

[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 11, 2015 - 03:36pm PT
Yeah, bravo...he had to buy the pilot a new drone...$800 lol
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Aug 11, 2015 - 08:55pm PT
See, squishy, when you post lies like that, you destroy any credibility you have in any of your arguments, because you have defined yourself as a liar.

http://fox5sandiego.com/2015/08/10/fisherman-hooks-drone-flying-over-crystal-pier/
CA.Timothy

climber
California
Aug 11, 2015 - 09:08pm PT
Yeah, bravo...he had to buy the pilot a new drone...$800 lol

nature said the same thing except quoted the price at $3000

where do you guys get this info from?
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 11, 2015 - 09:12pm PT
actually I said $1500 and that was a different instance. Phantom with gimbal and gopro is $1500. been too busy to find the rest of that story. but yeah, in this case squishy is incorrect as the line snapped.

not sure if this is the same story but it appears the guy with the shirt was cited:
http://omnifeed.com/article/www.havasunews.com/news/tossed-t-shirt-causes-drone-to-crash-in-lake-havasu/article_d1e5df0e-0370-11e5-8ead-8b7d9e74fb14.html

I recall reading a story where the operators agreed to not press charges if he paid for damages. can't seem to locate it though
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 12, 2015 - 09:31am PT
million dollar BAM!!

http://www.theverge.com/2015/8/12/9136279/drone-racing-league-one-million-backing
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Aug 12, 2015 - 06:20pm PT
We just need more eagles.

[Click to View YouTube Video]
doughnutnational

Gym climber
its nice here in the spring
Aug 12, 2015 - 06:28pm PT
http://abc30.com/news/officials-drone-almost-hits-skylife-helicopter.../925394/
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 14, 2015 - 07:27am PT
A medical chopper transporting a snakebite victim missed a drone by 20' near Fresno
Wednesday according to the LA Times. (only in the print edition so far)
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 14, 2015 - 10:24am PT

We need to tell our congresspeople to reign these f*#king things in. At the very minimum, IFF transponders mandated for every drone and every controller.

There are more than a million of these goddamned machines out there now....

Speaking for everyone or trying too "we need too!!.."

Using expletive to express emotional reaction "these f*#king things"

Sever, ignorant and police state regulation recommendation. "At the very minimum, IFF transponders mandated for every drone and every controller"



Common sense regulation is severely needed. But what is not needed is people like dingus here coming up with them..
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Aug 14, 2015 - 11:26am PT
Transponders aren't required for manned aircraft. It's going to be a hard sell getting them mandated for UAVs.

It seems like the FAA is heaping regulations on legitimate drone operators just because they can. Just for the hell of it.

A co-pilot for a drone? That's just totally asinine. Especially when you consider there are six-ton jets the FAA allows to be flown solo. Nature's probably kicking the tires on a few of these right now, while he gets his certification.

500' radius is a hell of an area to have to be clear of people. Especially when you're only flying 200' AGL maximum.

And how are you ( Nature and Squishy ) supposed to know with any certainty the altitude of your drone? The Kite Guys can't come up with a way to exactly measure the height of a kite - and we know exactly how many feet of line is out between us and our kites.

I hope you have some form of altitude/performance telemetry to record your flights, otherwise it could be your word against a lying cop:

"We just had an aircraft do a vertical climb pretty fast. Zero to about 2000 in less than 2 seconds."

http://animalnewyork.com/2014/listen-nypd-helicopter-pilots-lie-drone-air-traffic-controller/

Some bullets ( not all of them ) are capable of a supersonic ascent. An F-16 can only climb about 800 fps. ( Nature's probably shopping for one of those, too )

Maybe the cop wasn't lying, and he actually believes he saw a drone out-climb an F-16 at afterburner, but it doesn't matter. It'd suck to have to waste time and resources setting the cop who failed Junior High Science straight.



Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 14, 2015 - 01:35pm PT
Maybe the cop wasn't lying

Were his lips moving?
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 14, 2015 - 01:37pm PT
very interesting news today...I wonder how many main stream media outlets will let it reach you? They tend to foster the fear instead of tell the whole story...

http://diydrones.com/profiles/blogs/foia-request-reveals-faa-uas-enforcement-data
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 14, 2015 - 02:03pm PT
correct dingus, because the informed person knows a "toy drone" cannot do much of what you fear, lol. while those drones built and flow by more experienced people can fly that high and do...but their pilots are very skilled and trained...Read the link I provided above and see the FAA data of just how bullshit all those reports really are..try it...you are right there next to the credibility of a UFO researcher...just saying...lol
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 15, 2015 - 12:20pm PT
Just heard the medic on the Fresno snakebite flight interviewed. He said
the drone was 4-6 FEET and it was WITHIN THE ROTOR DIAMETER!
They were at 1000'. Are you kidding me?
John Duffield

Mountain climber
New York
Aug 15, 2015 - 02:46pm PT
I guess people will have to die to get any action.
SteveW

Trad climber
The state of confusion
Aug 15, 2015 - 03:10pm PT

YES!
Ban them!
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 17, 2015 - 07:41pm PT
It's high time that re-education camps were brought back, eh?
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Aug 17, 2015 - 07:44pm PT
It's high time that re-education camps were brought back, eh?

Only for drone scofflaws, and people throwing cigarette butts from their cars, Reilly.

I'm sure law enforcement and fire fighting crews will eventually have some sort of drone "intercept" tools. They are just starting to have to deal with this issue.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/b-c-fires-oliver-firefighters-in-southern-interior-grounded-by-drone-1.3192713
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Aug 17, 2015 - 09:21pm PT
The FAA is updating its current rules to cover drones and related aircraft, but the agency has already issued a preliminary set of guidelines. Drones shouldn’t operate above 400 feet, come within five miles of an airport without communicating with the airport and its control tower, or fly near people. According to the FAA, commercial airline pilots reported encountering 138 drones above 10,000 feet in June, and 137 in July. That’s up from 16 and 36 in June and July of 2014. The vast majority of hobby drones aren’t even capable of reaching that altitude, and many contain programmed limitations that prevent them from doing so.

The people causing problems, in other words, aren’t the guy who bought a $500 drone and wants to take some aerial photos of his house.

http://www.extremetech.com/uncategorized/212281-reports-of-drone-close-encounters-spiked-in-2015-with-no-simple-resolution-in-sight
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 17, 2015 - 09:24pm PT
Above 10,000 feet? You're kidding, right?
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Aug 17, 2015 - 10:34pm PT
^ they probably misquoted this below - "above" and "up to" 10,000 feet are different!

http://knowbeforeyoufly.org/2015/08/faa-pilot-reports-of-close-calls-with-drones-soar-in-2015/

Pilots of a variety of different types of aircraft – including many large, commercial air carriers – reported spotting 16 unmanned aircraft in June of 2014, and 36 the following month. This year, 138 pilots reported seeing drones at altitudes of up to 10,000 feet during the month of June, and another 137 in July.
Todd Eastman

climber
Bellingham, WA
Aug 17, 2015 - 10:40pm PT
Are the dronoids are the same folks that search for hidden treasure with metal detectors?
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 18, 2015 - 09:44am PT
We can fly to 10,000 easy...but we don't..

I had a great flying session this weekend..over land where they use to assemble nukes...what a waste of good space..

rurprider

Trad climber
Mt. Rubidoux
Aug 18, 2015 - 06:30pm PT
A downed drone is a good drone.
Yeah...Bubba, nice shot.

Video: Bubba Watson golf shot destroys drone

Kevin Ryan - Jul 27, 3:06 PM
1

Newsletter

265
2

PGA Tour golfer Bubba Watson is known for hitting long drives, but his latest accomplishment be more impressive.

During a recent interview with Golf Digest, Watson was answering questions and hitting fairway woods while answer "either or" questions.

While he was answering the questions, there was a camera on the ground filming and a drone with a camera hovering overhead to give viewers a unique perspective as the shots flew past.

Well, one of Watson's blasts blasted the drone.

See for yourself below.

It was cool to see the hit from the drone's perspective, and watching it crash and burn brought out the 8-year-old in me.

Awesome stuff.
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Aug 19, 2015 - 03:07am PT
I always thought RC planes were pretty cool but I don't like drones. I guess it is the impression that they have cameras and are there to spy on us...
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 19, 2015 - 07:56am PT
Today's LA Times:

Most recently, a DC-10 air tanker returning to base after fighting the Rocky fire in Northern California came within 50 feet of a drone, said Ken Pimlott, chief of the state Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

http://www.latimes.com/local/political/la-me-pc-fire-officials-warn-lawmakers-about-threat-of-drones-to-firefighting-aircraft-20150818-story.html

But a $5000 fine? What a joke! Make it $500K and 5 years and we can talk.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Aug 19, 2015 - 08:04am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 20, 2015 - 05:55pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Aug 20, 2015 - 06:07pm PT
Seems to be a lot of "drone knocked down by t-shirt" stories. There ought to be a law (bonus points for saying "phucking law") that if you can hit a drone with a t-shirt then the drone is fair game.

https://www.google.com/search?q=t-shirt+knocks+drone+out&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS530US530&oq=t-shirt+knocks+drone+out&aqs=chrome..69i57.7071j0j4&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8

CA.Timothy

climber
California
Aug 20, 2015 - 06:07pm PT
squishy

your video is boring.
CA.Timothy

climber
California
Aug 20, 2015 - 06:09pm PT
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/augustine-lehecka-california-drone-beach

and the DA declined to press charges....


not a good precedent for your kind squishy
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Aug 20, 2015 - 06:39pm PT
In fairness to Squishy, he's not flying around peeping at girls on the beach or in their backyard.

In fairness to the anti-drone t-shirts, right on!
Tony

Trad climber
Pt. Richmond, CA
Aug 20, 2015 - 07:02pm PT
Here's another drone take-down.
[Click to View YouTube Video]

Hopefully, no charges will be pressed.

[Edit: I recommend muting the soundtrack]
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 20, 2015 - 07:08pm PT
God love 'em!
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 20, 2015 - 07:30pm PT
http://www.vcstar.com/news/state/downing-drone-at-san-diego-county-beach-leads-to-jail#st_refDomain=www.facebook.com&st_refQuery=/

ENCINITAS, Calif. (AP) — A beachgoer who tossed a T-shirt into the propellers of a low-flying drone, causing it to crash, was arrested on a felony vandalism charge in San Diego County.
Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Aug 20, 2015 - 07:53pm PT
No charges filed in the Encinitas case
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Aug 20, 2015 - 08:02pm PT
12 gauge ammo that "contains a proprietary ferromagnetic ballistic payload" :)

http://www.dronemunition.com/
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Aug 20, 2015 - 08:15pm PT
In an interview with KNSD-TV, the operator, who works for a drone company and asked to not be named, says he was flying at a safe distance above the crowd and wasn't invading anyone's privacy.


Hmmm. What is a "safe distance"? I don't know about you guys, but the distance I can throw a t-shirt is pretty short. We aren't talking about 100 yards.

Also note that this was one of Squishy's "professionals"!
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Aug 23, 2015 - 11:02am PT
Drones are so bad. Right? TARDS
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 24, 2015 - 09:47am PT
While you were all chatting about drones, I was out flying them






Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Aug 27, 2015 - 06:59am PT
http://thehill.com/policy/transportation/252051-calif-moves-to-limit-drone-flights-over-private-property

California is moving to prohibit drones from flying over private property as the federal government is mulling a rapid expansion in the use of the devices, The Los Angeles Times reports.

The California State Assembly has approved legislation that would outlaw drone flights over private property at altitudes that are below 350 feet, according to the report.

The paper reported that the sponsors of the legislation argue that drone flights at lower attitudes than the threshold of their bill should be considered trespassing.

"If you drive on someone's property with a car, you're trespassing. If you're looking on someone's property to break in, you're trespassing," Assemblyman Mike Gatto (D-Los Angeles) said during a debate on the measure in the California lower chamber, according to the report.

"It makes no sense that a drone should be able to look in your window and the operator should not be guilty of the same trespass," Gatto continued.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Aug 27, 2015 - 07:05am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]

Spirit of Big Wednesday drone style
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Aug 27, 2015 - 07:08am PT
http://www.wired.com/2015/08/welcome-world-drone-killing-laser-cannon/
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 27, 2015 - 08:09am PT
It'll need to be bundled with a water tunnel bill to have any chance, or another train.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 27, 2015 - 08:39am PT
The California State Assembly has approved legislation that would outlaw drone flights over private property at altitudes that are below 350 feet, according to the report.

I wonder if they mindfully decided on the 350 foot number of if that was just Amazon paying them off to ensure they have a flight corridor. seems like a logical number

Did a little flying at SushiFest

but mostly it's been mornings like these

landing has been getting easier. the flare. 10 seconds of pure and unadulterated fun


overwatch

climber
Aug 27, 2015 - 09:06am PT
That first shot is an impressive lightning strike. Nice one
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Aug 27, 2015 - 10:38am PT
i found your stupid drone.

http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/sfo/4400154348.html
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 27, 2015 - 11:14am PT
Facing possible ban, more Americans are buying new—and legal—$900 flamethrowers

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/08/facing-possible-ban-more-americans-are-buying-new-and-legal-900-flamethrowers/

http://store.xm42.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=XM42
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Aug 27, 2015 - 05:00pm PT
Just think. You can hose down that trespassing drone with your flame thrower.

Life is so interesting.
zBrown

Ice climber
Aug 27, 2015 - 06:10pm PT
Uh, flamethrowers are as American as apple pie. They literally, power all the record setters. Well excpet Usain Bolt, but he's not really American now is he?

Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Aug 27, 2015 - 06:13pm PT
They're just tons of fun.
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Aug 28, 2015 - 09:15am PT
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-lapd-detains-drone-pilot-20150828-story.html

Los Angeles police officers briefly detained a man in East Hollywood on Thursday night who they say flew a drone too close to a police helicopter.

The airship was helping officers on the ground look for a person around Western Avenue and Sunset Boulevard, where police had set up a perimeter, when the drone flew nearby, said Officer Nuria Vanegas.

The helicopter “had to make some movements to avoid” the drone, she said. Officers found the man controlling the drone and detained him, she said. Video of the incident showed an officer seizing a white quadcopter-type drone while others handcuffed the man they say flew it.

He was detained but not arrested, Vanegas said.

“This is new territory,” she said of the incident.

Police say the man interfered with police work, and they plan to send a report to prosecutors for possible charges, she said.

As private drones become more prevalent, cities like Los Angeles are trying to find ways to regulate them.

The LAPD last year began researching what laws can be used to regulate private drone use but gained little traction. The Federal Aviation Administration regulates only how high and how close to airports drones can fly.

On Friday, the Los Angeles City Council will consider supporting proposed state legislation that would make it a crime to fly private drones near wildfires and above up to 350 feet above private property.
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 28, 2015 - 10:57am PT
Full size aircraft pilot calls it a drone, reports it to the FAA when he saw nothing..oh and no one died..

http://forums.jetcareers.com/threads/drones-and-common-sense-rant.221034/page-9

Welcome to one of your numerous "dangerous drone sightings". The drone hate is so strong in the pilot circles that they can no longer be trusted..

Guess what a picture of a bird strike looks like?

mucci

Trad climber
The pitch of Bagalaar above you
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:21am PT
LOL!

Squishy makes this thread interesting, without him there would be no thread.

LOne woLF

Pilots lying about drones....

LOL
hooblie

climber
from out where the anecdotes roam
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:48am PT
several years ago i piloted a flight from fairbanks to the yellowstone region during the third week of september. i had accepted a dream job and felt some pressure to show up for it. the timing was pretty much peak travel season for migratory waterfowl, their flyways pretty consistent with air routes connecting fuel stops and what with low ceilings we were, as the saying goes, "all in it together".

in place of geese, had there been that many drones to dodge i guess i'd be expected to gripe.

i'll admit, the dream of seeing skies darkened by historic populations of winged roaster meat sits a bit better
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:53am PT
hooblie, you got the balls to tell this guy he can't fly where he wants to?
Besides, he's grandfeathered into the airspace.

hooblie

climber
from out where the anecdotes roam
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:56am PT
no leather hat ... no special treatment
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 28, 2015 - 01:40pm PT
I guess pointing out the fact that the reports and facts you are using cannot be trusted isn't working. So I will educate you about the positive uses and the many companies and growing industry all around you, especially in California. You have no way of stopping it, you have already lost any argument you start...

http://www.examiner.com/article/amateur-drone-pilot-finds-man-missing-for-three-days

http://www.airware.com/

http://3drobotics.com/

http://www.uxvuniversity.com/

http://fpvracing.tv/events/74

In the Chinese province of Luoyang, authorities are using drones to crack down on academic cheaters. Annually millions of students sit for higher level admission exams known as “gaokao”; the exam holds tremendous weight in determining the course of a student’s life. The exams are extremely stressful and have lead to some students seeking sophisticated ways to cheat. Authorities are using anti-cheating drones to crackdown on this high-tech form of cheating, the drones are able to detect radio signals and identify the offenders. Drones Spot Cheats Taking 'World's Most Stressful' Exam.

Microsoft launched “Project Premonition,” an aim to prevent major health disasters. Though vague about the details, the goal of the project is to monitor infectious agents as they travel across the globe. The drone is equipped with tiny containers that help collect mosquitos and fly them back to a lab where scientists analyze them for potentially dangerous new viruses. Project Premonition Aims to Use Mosquitoes, Drones, Cloud Computing to Prevent Disease Outbreaks.

Amazon is working closely with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to iron out logistics, and is hoping to add drone delivery as a shipping option in the near future. The ability to deliver packages in as fast as 30 minutes could be game changing for Amazon in competing against big box retailers like Wal-Mart and Target. Amazon Executive Sees Drone Operations Ready Once FAA Finalizes Rules.

Google is experimenting using drones to deliver Internet access to parts of the world where it doesn’t exist. These specially developed custom drones are powered by the sun and built for long-endurance flights. Google reports the drone can stay airborne for as long as five years. This could be a game changer in the way we communicate and the ability to remain connected everywhere. Google Wants To Test Drones That Deliver Internet Access In New Mexico.
5.Hollywood is one of the first industries to profit from the use of commercial drones. The FAA issued permits in 2014 to six movie and TV production companies, for the use of drones to film everything from movies, TV shows, sports, and commercials. Access to this technology has increased creative angles and eliminated need for expensive alternatives; therefore allowing creative directors to accomplish shots on a tight budget while not sacrificing production value. Drones Invade Hollywood.
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 28, 2015 - 01:43pm PT
I know there's a bunch of bay area people here, if you are not climbing tomorrow because you are one of those old taco stand has beens, then go check this out and see some of the action in person..

Drone races (IDRA)
Oakland , California, United StatesMerritt College 12500 Campus Dr, Oakland, CA 94619-3107, United States Soccer Field A
August 29, 201510:00 AM
mucci

Trad climber
The pitch of Bagalaar above you
Aug 28, 2015 - 02:12pm PT


It is OVER!!!

LOL
mucci

Trad climber
The pitch of Bagalaar above you
Aug 28, 2015 - 02:20pm PT
What if a drone took out another drone, ALA mad max style?

Would the operator go to jail Squishy?
squishy

Mountain climber
Aug 28, 2015 - 02:37pm PT
old news...it's actually one of the more effective counter measures..

nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 28, 2015 - 06:41pm PT
Ban Drones you say? The Tool seems to have a different plan:
http://www.theverge.com/2015/8/26/9211165/north-dakota-armed-drones-tasers
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Aug 30, 2015 - 09:10am PT
that one was kind of a yawner.

I found this one much more interesting. Once again - wild fires and drones in the news.

http://www.suasnews.com/2015/08/38145/park-service-borrows-drone-to-guide-olympic-rainforest-wildfire-fight/

The Beast just got new 15" carbon props and some new bricks. Hoping to get 45 minutes of flight time. Just converted a GoPro to NIR and am ordering the FLIR next week.
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Aug 30, 2015 - 02:53pm PT
Devils Punchbowl County Park, Ca
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Aug 30, 2015 - 02:55pm PT
Nowhere special really.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Sep 1, 2015 - 04:23pm PT
Don't try this in California.

[Click to View YouTube Video]

Already illegal.

2.45. COMPUTER ASSISTED REMOTE FISHING.
(a) It is unlawful to take or assist in the taking of any fish in or from this state, by computer-assisted remote fishing.
(b) It is unlawful to establish or operate a computer-assisted remote fishing site for the purpose of taking any fish from or within this state.
(c) For the purposes of this section, “computer-assisted remote fishing” means the use of a computer or any other remotely controlled device, equipment, software, or technology, to remotely control the aiming or discharge of any weapon, including, but not limited to, any firearm, bow and arrow, spear, harpoon or any other weapon capable of killing or injuring any fish, for the purposes of taking any fish.
(d) For the purposes of this section, “computer-assisted remote fishing site” means any computer, internet site or web-based device or system, or other electronically operated site or system used to assist in the remote taking fish


climber
Sep 4, 2015 - 03:08pm PT
This is what you should be worrying about instead of a drone with a gopro!
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/05/06/chp-aircraft-catches-east-bay-motorcyclist-going-120-mph-on-the-highway/

[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 9, 2015 - 12:48pm PT
Airplane pilot hears something, lands and reports a drone sighting to the FAA. Goes home to post and boast in the anti-drone thread...even speaks publicly about never seeing it, yet proud he's turning in those evil drone pilots...FAA investigates, finds it was a bird, forums and posts all deleted and pilots finally coming under the scrutiny they need for starting all this drone hate, that some here have drank by the tank load..

I worked with plane pilots and drone operators to break the story. The reports you see in the media and even the official drone reports and sightings near full scale airplanes are padded stats done with intent by people who fear the future.

http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Reported-Drone-Collision-Was-a-Birdstrike-224805-1.html

squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 9, 2015 - 01:10pm PT
Oh...and the future means DRONES!!! they will be doing everything and some will even look like your car and the traditional airliner...
http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Diamonds-Autonomous-DA42-Completes-Autolanding-Tests-224826-1.html
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Sep 9, 2015 - 01:24pm PT
and the future means DRONES!!!

Yeah, and don't we all remember them saying that 'puters would be the end of paper?
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Sep 9, 2015 - 01:47pm PT
Please don't kill anyone with your drone.

with this I hope I can save lives:


squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 9, 2015 - 02:38pm PT
nice, now you can see those naked ladies at night too..
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Sep 9, 2015 - 02:51pm PT
exactly! cuz 640x480 is HI REZ!
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 9, 2015 - 11:05pm PT
Oh and ...

Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Sep 9, 2015 - 11:07pm PT
Like he came by the 'Gov Moonbeam' sobriquet by chance?
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Sep 12, 2015 - 05:20pm PT
http://kfor.com/2015/09/12/drone-shot-down-at-inhofe-fundraiser/

Those Oakies know how to handle drones.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Sep 14, 2015 - 10:42am PT
This URL is rather relevant to parts of this discussion

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/09/13/drone-reports-faa-close-call-near-miss-academy-model-aeronautics-/72064388/

squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 14, 2015 - 11:30am PT
I was just gonna post that nature, in the USA today no less, I pushed for that story through a FB group, it was a lot of work to get someone to pick it up... http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/09/13/drone-reports-faa-close-call-near-miss-academy-model-aeronautics-/72064388/
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 14, 2015 - 11:47am PT
I will instead provide this one from Motherboard, it's great: http://motherboard.vice.com/read/drones-are-the-new-ufos
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Sep 16, 2015 - 12:59pm PT
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-pasadena-drone-flight-20150916-story.html

The Federal Aviation Administration announced Wednesday that it will investigate a drone accident that injured an 11-month-old girl in the head when it crashed last weekend on a Pasadena street.

Authorities said the baby was being pushed in a stroller by her mother when she was hit with debris from a small, privately-owned drone that came down on Marengo Avenue near Union Street about 6:30 p.m. Saturday.

The baby suffered a large contusion on her forehead and a small cut to the side of her head, according to police. She was treated at a hospital and released.
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 16, 2015 - 03:21pm PT
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2337656/11-month-old-baby-rushed-hospital-hit-car-sidewalk-Midtown-Manhattan.html

An SUV jumped the curb on a busy stretch of sidewalk in Midtown Manhattan Friday afternoon.

The ensuing crash injured six people - including an 11-month-old baby who was in critical condition with a head injury, officials said.


nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Sep 16, 2015 - 03:57pm PT
maybe this belongs in the shameless selfie thread?

MikeMc

Social climber
Sep 16, 2015 - 03:59pm PT
^^^ that beer looks cold.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Sep 16, 2015 - 04:00pm PT
If it's not cold then there are multiple things wrong with that image.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Sep 16, 2015 - 04:36pm PT
Gary - thank you for that link. I had not seen it. That's messed up.

I don't want to give you guys too hard of a time but I can't not make the connection to the things we posted up thread and this story. An 11 year old got hit by a drone. The FAA is investigating. I'll assume the story is real (don't see any reason to not figure that) and thus worth investigating. They should put their energy into this - this is messed up.

But what say you guys about the article posted regarding the AMA's findings. Why no response? It's disingenuous to post a story like this w/o addressing the other side. Is that how you roll?
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Sep 16, 2015 - 07:09pm PT
nature, there's no comparison between your professional use of drones and what an increasing number of yahoos are doing. The "aviator" in Pasadena deserves whatever he's got coming. Just like the car driver in the other story.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Sep 16, 2015 - 07:31pm PT
Gary, I absolutely agree with you on that.

But perhaps you did not read the post both squish and I referred to? The basic conclusion is that these near miss drone reports are not what they appear. Further, the biggest point I took away from the article is that given that conclusion perhaps our time would be better spent taking care of business with real events (like the link you posted)?

And as far as the idea of any of us really being "aviators" we can just move past that. We are operators and some of us have a background in aviation. With that background we might be termed that since not all aviation requires the human body leaves the ground in a flying vehicle (pretty sure my ground school session early in the AM qualifies me as a student aviator at the very least?).

Flying the one on the right tomorrow:

This 152 just landed. Wild that you can see past the cowling and right into the cylinders:
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Sep 16, 2015 - 07:39pm PT
Further, the biggest point I took away from the article is that given that conclusion perhaps our time would be better spent taking care of business with real events (like the link you posted)?

Dealing with reality is always a good thing.

I always wanted to fly, but having no depth perception made it a non-starter I thought.
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 16, 2015 - 11:10pm PT
Story so far is that is was a wannbe professional filming an event..which is actually some of the most dangerous ones because they risk crowds and dangerous flights for the "shot"...where as hobbyists are out in the open in safe places and there to enjoy themselves...big difference. Flying over crowds is still debated in drone pilot circles, hard to believe that professionals would advocate for it, but some actually defend it. Recently a very old hobby company posted a video on youtube from a multirotor craft they began to sell. The community jumped on them for flying over an event and crowds for much of it. It was removed within days.

this as#@&%e who hit the child and the incident leading to it is exactly the type of hypothetical scenario I used in an article years ago about flying over crowds within our local community. It was ill received then, people thought I was nuts and I was the fun police for preaching to everyone about flying safe. When we lack good laws we had to make up some of our own and self police, and we did. This type of incident will actually be more common without some good common sense regulations. Hitting airplanes in the sky is not what I am concerned with. It's hitting people and things on the ground.
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Sep 17, 2015 - 07:31am PT
overwatch

climber
Sep 17, 2015 - 09:40am PT
Eleven MONTHS old

For the record I have no doubt Squishy and Nature are both responsible professionals
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 17, 2015 - 09:46am PT
Yes we need common sense laws governing the use of drones. We should take input from the professional side of the business in terms of needs, but we should not leave the determination of common sense in the hands of drone operators. We need to hold the FAA feet to the fire and again ask our legislators to come up with safety rules that protect aviation and people, all at once. I don't really care if squishy isn't concerned about a drone taking out an airplane. His insistence that this can't or won't happen is a prime example of why we can't leave the rule book in the hands of the kids. They just can't be trusted.

lol putting words in my mouth, mis characterizing me, all signs of a illogical person without a illogical argument and failing to miss all the nuance of this convo.

We should take input from the professional side of the business in terms of needs

There are none, this is a new industry with a revolutionary start coming from the hobbyists garages, the hobbyists and people like me, the community I come from are the subject matter experts in the field right now, that is what you fail to understand. There's a reason the FAA, FCC and AMA brought me in to the drone nationals and the flight director and safety boss..there's a damn good reason..

His insistence that this can't or won't happen is a prime example of why we can't leave the rule book in the hands of the kids. They just can't be trusted.

When have I ever stated it will never happen or cannot happen? where? And you just called a 37 year old a kid, lol you old fart. Simply put bro, I am the professional, I am representative of "kids" with the most powerful resumes in this industry.

So your tactic to discredit me in front of a populace or even officials who already come to me for all the information on the subject, is sort of just sad really. The only reason I still engage you is because I actually like you. But dude...get a grip..lol


nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Sep 17, 2015 - 11:43am PT
yeah, DMT what's with the mischaracterization on squishy? Not to mention the passive aggressive insults. it's very unbecoming.
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 17, 2015 - 01:05pm PT
He thinks he has historical beef with me when it was misunderstanding instigated by sick trolls. You know how he just loves those trolls..it's all good, that was in a past life for me and I do stop to explain, make excuses or clear any of it up (so maybe this is ultimately on me). I severed all ties with that life for good reason and it's healthy for me to not revisit it..dingus can choose to do what he pleases..but swimming against the cloud of quads is not something he will be successful in doing, lol. The drone revolution is literally crashing on his head, like a mavericks wave, he is nothing but a grain of sand and maybe he knows it...embrace the future or get out the way and move to a care facility...
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 17, 2015 - 01:15pm PT
While I am a state gov employ and US army vet, I do not fly drones in anyway shape or form that resembles the military use of them. But I admit, this tool can be used for bad and evil things. Easily. But so can everything, like a stick, knife, hammer and even an ice pick (which started a world war). That is a fact of life and something we must live with. We need to afford the same respect we give all our tools, to drones (and the people who have learned to build and fly them competently and safely). for the good and the bad that it brings, they are here to stay..a better use of our time would be education...not debate


MisterE

Gym climber
Being In Sierra Happy Of Place
Sep 17, 2015 - 04:34pm PT
For the record I have no doubt Squishy and Nature are both responsible professionals

Maybe at flying drones, but have you see the quality of Nature's photos up-thread?

Just deplorable.
Pennsylenvy

Gym climber
A dingy corner in your refrigerator
Sep 17, 2015 - 08:53pm PT
Late night weigh in on drones from me:I don't see too much wrong with them when I don't see them .......it's when I have been in a public place seeking serenity and someone has no consideration for peace and quiet and flies over me. Last time was in a quiet space reflection park in Sedona. Not too stoked to see these things invade my beach experience, my climbing experience etc... kind of like going to a public place and seeing everyone looking at their smartphones instead of talking to each other. Cue in LOCKER style ....
































modern masturbation.....
justthemaid

climber
Jim Henson's Basement
Sep 18, 2015 - 05:33am PT
Had our first drone incident up at Schulman Grove this week. Guy was buzzing the Discovery Trail too close pissing people off. Dumbass crashed it into the talus and bailed before we could run him off. Hope it cost him a lot of $.

It's safe to say that flying drones around any area where people have an extremely high expectation of peace, quiet and serenity is totally asinine and inappropriate.

I'm with Tim on...
I don't see too much wrong with them when I don't see them ......

nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Sep 18, 2015 - 07:13am PT
Maybe at flying drones, but have you see the quality of Nature's photos up-thread?

you just wait until those deplorable IR images are of you after I saved your lost ass on a SAR mission :-P



I really do not understand those that would fly in a crowd where it is visibly obvious you are annoying people. With the right approach all those people that are annoyed can (and will) quickly become interested. I've seen it time and time again.
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 18, 2015 - 08:50pm PT
oh wow, look at this, a good one: http://airfactsjournal.com/2015/09/stop-drone-panic-pilots-take-advice/

All this hysteria has a cost. While we’ve been panicking about drones, dozens of pilots have died in low level stalls or VFR-into-IMC accidents. We’ve even had a real airplane midair, between a jet and a Cessna in San Diego. None of these make the nightly news or the front page of the New York Times, but all of them present a much more serious threat to general aviation safety.
MisterE

Gym climber
Being In Sierra Happy Of Place
Sep 18, 2015 - 09:07pm PT
"Drones are the Devil!!!1111666"

squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 22, 2015 - 10:42am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 22, 2015 - 11:40am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Sep 22, 2015 - 11:51am PT
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-los-angeles-drone-charges-20150922-story.html

The Los Angeles city attorney’s office charged a man Tuesday with obstructing a peace officer for allegedly flying a drone too close to a police helicopter.

Martin Sheldon, 57, was charged with two counts of obstructing a peace officer in performance of his duties and faces up to $1,000 in fines and a year in jail, officials said.

“Video footage from the device allegedly showed the drone fly towards the police helicopter, as well as its spotlight, and numerous police units below” on Aug. 27, the city attorney's office said in a statement.

A police helicopter was helping officers on the ground in East Hollywood look for a person around Western Avenue and Sunset Boulevard, where police had set up a perimeter, when the drone flew nearby, said LAPD Officer Nuria Vanegas.

The helicopter “had to make some movements to avoid” the drone, she said. Officers found Sheldon in a nearby parking lot and took him and his drone into custody.

TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Sep 23, 2015 - 05:35pm PT
http://www.c4isrnet.com/story/military-tech/uas-isr/2015/09/23/marines-black-hornet-micro-uas/72677354/
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Sep 23, 2015 - 05:48pm PT
"Its range is about one mile, with a ceiling surpassing 10,000 feet."


Must have been controlling from an airplane?!?
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Sep 23, 2015 - 06:00pm PT
The ceiling is when you run out of air to fly in.

That means it won't fly above 10K.

That has nothing to do with range from the controller.
overwatch

climber
Sep 23, 2015 - 06:23pm PT
We are talking about mere mortals though, Medusa, you are a mythic creature.
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Sep 23, 2015 - 07:17pm PT
"That has nothing to do with range from the controller"




For whatever reason the ceiling is 10k how would controlled flight be possible at that altitude when the controller range is 5280ft......just wondering how they would get that data.:)
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Sep 23, 2015 - 07:21pm PT
Easy,

take off from a 9000 ft peak

Altitude is measured at a standard temperature. The density altitude is temperature dependent. The hotter it is, the higher you are. 10k ft may be 6k ft on a hot day.

That's why a few years ago PDX closed down because it was about 120 which made the effective density altitude of Phoenix about 10k ft and airliners could not take off.
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Sep 23, 2015 - 07:29pm PT
That Black Hornet Nano would sure come in handy for seeing if I'm cliffed out or not, steep skiing :-)

A bit beyond my price range, however, if it were for sale. $20 million to develop and deliver 160 units.
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Oct 3, 2015 - 11:59am PT
Sorry if its already been posted. . .[Click to View YouTube Video]
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Oct 6, 2015 - 07:00am PT
Press Release – FAA Proposes $1.9 Million Civil Penalty Against SkyPan International for Allegedly Unauthorized Unmanned Aircraft Operations

http://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=19555

43 flights into New York Bravo. if true these guys are getting what they deserve
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Oct 6, 2015 - 07:08am PT
Good Drone! doing what a good drone does..
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Oct 6, 2015 - 08:28am PT
Then you got to pay for a new one DMT.. against the law to shoot one down. you don't own the air space above your home.
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Oct 6, 2015 - 08:33am PT
you don't own the air space above your home.

Incorrect.
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Oct 6, 2015 - 08:36am PT
Tell that to the police Chopper flying a 100 feet above your home.
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Oct 6, 2015 - 08:44am PT
When used with permission by the people you want to film, in a out of the way area, all you have is great shots and good times. DMT ill get you some killer shots of you climbing, when ever..
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Oct 6, 2015 - 01:01pm PT
FAA proposes nearly $2 million fine against drone operator

http://news.yahoo.com/faa-proposes-nearly-2-million-fine-against-drone-145412571--finance.html


Why? Because these COMMERCIAL OPERATORS refused to stop when the FAA required that they stop their illegal flying.
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Oct 6, 2015 - 01:07pm PT
DMT to many folks at stony, better someplace with less peep's..
overwatch

climber
Oct 6, 2015 - 01:34pm PT
I for one would like to see more of your drone shot climbing footage. I said it before and I'll say it again drone use can or maybe is already for all I know, revolutionize climbing video
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Oct 6, 2015 - 01:37pm PT
Tell that to the police Chopper flying a 100 feet above your home.

Whatever aviation easements that might be in effect, you own the airspace above your property, just like you own to the center of the earth below your property.

The police chopper is trespassing if it's only 100 feet up. Just like an officer is trespassing.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Oct 7, 2015 - 07:09am PT
http://theadvocate.com/news/13641316-172/ascension-parish-resident-shoots-down
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Oct 7, 2015 - 08:08am PT
You can't discharge a firearm within city limits in many areas, even semi rural areas. I know I can't in San Diego. My dad, living on the outskirts of Payson AZ and on a few acres, hunts his property with a crossbow because it is illegal to use a firearm within the city limits. Probably saves him a fair amount on reloads tho... ;)

Another thing to remember when you are pizzed off at the drone near your house is what goes up must come down. Shotgun pellets are not as much of a problem as bullets, but can still put an eye out so pay attention which direction you shoot.

nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Oct 7, 2015 - 08:48am PT
I did my first solo today and I can tell you the last thing I was thinking about was being visited by a sUAV.

Otherwise I'm the worlds newest PIC (at least for another hour or three?).
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Oct 7, 2015 - 01:24pm PT
Overwatch, I have just been shooting stills. Video editing kills my time to climb.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Oct 7, 2015 - 01:56pm PT
sounds like you have more of a problem being spied on in foreign countries. what is it you are not telling us?

will be interesting to see where this goes:

“They can pinpoint the operator,” DeFazio said. “They can force the drone to land, they can force it to go back to the operator. Or, in the case of hostiles, they can deliver something to the operator.”

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/10/07/faa-drone-research-airports-caci-international/73516606/
PAUL SOUZA

Trad climber
Central Valley, CA
Oct 7, 2015 - 02:02pm PT
Someone needs to make a focused radio jammer to bring those f'in things down.

This past Saturday I was relaxing in El Cap Meadow and took a snooze. I awoke to hear the buzzing of a damn sUAV. UGH! The guy was flying it for about 10 mins. I packed up my stuff and headed to my bike and was going to stop by and warn them that flying drones are illegal in the park. But when I got there they packed it up.
couchmaster

climber
Oct 8, 2015 - 06:01am PT


Medusa, great climbing shots via your drone. Thanks for sharing them. Next issue: "They" were listening to Paul Souze up there and fixed this issue for you DMT, get these for airports, the range is over 20 miles. Done worrying over it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3264166/The-drone-death-ray-knock-UAVs-mile-away-using-radio-waves.html

The "Death Ray" picture.


nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Oct 8, 2015 - 06:41am PT
couch - did you read my article i posted about the FAA and CACI relationship? It sounds like that is the technology we need at airports. I particularly like the idea of sending a package to the hostile operator ;-)
squishy

Mountain climber
Oct 8, 2015 - 09:35am PT
5.8ghz, 2.4ghz, and 1.2ghz helical antennas with a target designator and a little power behind them, very nice...that will do the trick nicely..it's super easy to swamp a hobby from signal, we do it to each other all the time with our equipment, by accident.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Oct 8, 2015 - 10:01am PT
whatcha gonna do about my UHF big boy?!?!?!
portent

Social climber
your mom's house
Oct 20, 2015 - 07:05am PT
Had my first drone experience a few weeks ago. Completely annoying and they kept circling above use, we were just hanging out and drinking beers. I' already have to deal with the bay area riff-raff, now this?!? :)

At least Jeff can get some rad shots of himself to go home and... well... you know...
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Oct 20, 2015 - 09:30pm PT
portent - that sucks.

don't expect much to come from yesterdays announcement that there will be an announcement regarding drone registration. The FAA is a sh#t-show and coupled with congress, well, exponential sh#t-show.

Yes, reasonable registration is a must. But do you remember when the FCC tried to make you register CB's? Yeah, how'd that go over.

And for f*#k sake - gun registration is even more overdue. how's that working out?

Myself, I could really care less about all of this. My big rig is already registered. All of my vehicles will be registered. I've no choice under our 333 exemption. I have no complaints (other than the FAA taking waaaaay to long to grant our exemption)

The problem here is they are going the wrong route. They did that math - there isn't enough potential N-numbers to go around. I do not believe tail number registration is the answer. The system was never designed for this and simply cannot handle it. A visible tail number is not going to help.

Yes, link the serial number to the person that bought it. That will work for not very long (sold on ebay?)

I watched the House sub-committee hearing on drones two weeks ago so this is no surprise. Most of this is a bunch of knee-jerk reactions from people who still don't have a clue about WTF any of this is about. And if you wish to argue my last point you should watch the C-SPAN replay of it before commenting. It was pathetic - though, I'm sure, symbolic of how our gubberment doesn't run.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Oct 21, 2015 - 06:35am PT
machine guns and drones - gun nuts gonna love this

http://www.guns.com/2015/10/20/drone-watches-world-famous-knob-creek-night-shoot-video/?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=562684bb04d3015ed1000001&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Oct 21, 2015 - 07:25am PT
Firing squad! ;)


Uh... don't you mean - Send in a Drone Strike! ;)


The insurance thing is not happening for recreational operators. It's going to be difficult enough to get the registration process going. As a commercial operator I am required to carry $1M liability and property damage insurance. That of course makes sense.


Also, I don't see any sort of real policing happening (they eluded to nothing of the sort at either the announcement of the announcement or in the sub-committee hearing). The point is to be able to trace the vehicle back to the owner when something dumb happens (like it crashes on the WH lawn).

On this I am opposed as it's not practical and the last thing we need is an even greater police state. Or at the very least I have mixed feelings. I just don't see how it could work in a practical way.

It's f-ing pathetic watching the children react to this. Some real stupid sh#t.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Oct 21, 2015 - 04:29pm PT
^^^^ Looks expensive but maybe DMT and I could time-share one?

What I'm really waiting for is one I could aim at news choppers that
would cause the pilot to sh!t his britches.
squishy

Mountain climber
Oct 21, 2015 - 04:48pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Oct 21, 2015 - 05:04pm PT
Nice squishy.

I'm going on record right now and stating they will not have this implemented by christmas. They don't even know what they are up against. They have little idea about the bullshit stupidity that is going on with the current registration process.

1) What are they going to do have carbon copy form 8050-1 sitting on the counter at HobbyLobby for everyone that buys a toy? You have to email the FAA or stop by a regional FSDO office. The carbon copy form is not going away.

2) the registration process and reasons for kicking forms back are very inconsistent. I had a conversation today with a guy that's been doing this for a couple years and he points out he can't get a straight answer on what is the right way to fill out the forms. He's getting forms kicked back because they used blue ink instead of black - yet the form clearly states USE INK without stating a color. WTF?

3) There are not enough N- numbers to go around.

4) If you purchase a DJI Phantom you have to prove it was not registered in another country. So you submit a form to the FAA which is used to make a request to the federal government to contact the Chinese government to prove the drone was not already registered. and the DJI products are the most popular selling right now.

5) Privacy - a 12 year old wants to register a drone and submits their info. What's public record? Back side of the instructions for form 8050-1 disclose the privacy and some of your information is public record. Serious implications for minors.


This registration process is the wrong approach. I do not believe the FAA registration department should be tasked with this.

And seriously - flood an office with a million registration forms (currently there are about 350K registered) and kick 2/3rds back because you didn't do something right even though you followed directions? People will tell the FAA to GFYS.

At the rate the FAA is moving it's laughable to think they can have this in place in two months. Just laughable.


I should hear back in a week or so how the process went for my first vehicle. I should be good as my advantage is it was built in the US so 8050-1 and a sales receipt is all I need according to the directions.



Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Oct 21, 2015 - 05:13pm PT
Well, Nature, knowing the FAA quite well I cannot disagree with you. As an
example look up the history of Microwave Landing System. LOL - the FAA
dicked around with that for at least 5 years IIRC, if not more.

BTW, Nature, my bro-in-law is a licenced Airframe & Powerplant mechanic in
addition to being an ATP. Crawling into the tail cone on a Dash 8 was not
on the pre-flight checklist! ;-/
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Oct 21, 2015 - 05:23pm PT
Well now I feel like the kid in the corner with the dunce cap on. Why did they make me crawl into the tail cone of the 172 w/o a flashlight? :-).

How does a frayed cable not get caught in the 100hr maintenance?

Every time I do pre-flight on the tail I'm thinking - wow, I can see 1% of the rudder and elevator cables. That's.... comforting.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Oct 21, 2015 - 05:47pm PT
How does a frayed cable not get caught in the 100hr maintenance?

Good question but there could be many answers. I'll give you one in a
parable: my step-father died in a famous crash caused directly by union
intransigence about shift times and refusing to finish a critical procedure.
The failure to finish it properly was not documented and the next shift did
not catch it and 273 people died.
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Oct 27, 2015 - 12:28pm PT
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-drone-power-west-hollywood-20151027-story.html

uthorities are looking for the pilot of a drone that flew into power lines Monday in West Hollywood and knocked out service to hundreds of Southern California Edison customers, officials said.

Witnesses reported seeing a drone buzz into the wires lining Larrabee Street and Sunset Boulevard about 1:15 p.m. knocking one to the ground, said Lt. Edward Ramirez of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

The downed wire cut off power for nearly 700 SCE customers, said company spokesman Robert Villegas.

nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Oct 27, 2015 - 12:57pm PT
I wonder if the dude will turn himself in. That's a $3K machine he left hanging around. f'ing idiot.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Nov 1, 2015 - 08:57pm PT
Check this guy out, Nature.

http://www.vividaa.com/

Claims "SECTION 333 EXEMPTION STATUS: GRANTED" on his website, right next to apparent Sextion 333 Exemption Bozo no-nos, like this...

[Click to View YouTube Video]

and this one ...

[Click to View YouTube Video]

#26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:...

and

#27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative.

( from Nature's post, this thread, August 4, outlining the Section 333 stuff -- looking it up here took less time than looking it up on the web )

Oak Harbor and Deception Pass are well within five miles of a busy airport; N.A.S. Whidbey, too.



So, what makes this guy exceptional?



He's the guy in Seattle whose drone fell out of the sky, and onto the parade his drone was flying over, knocking-cold the lady it hit ...

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/crime/woman-knocked-unconscious-by-falling-drone-during-seattles-pride-parade/

... and now he's criminally charged with reckless endangerment:

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/crime/drone-operator-charged-with-knocking-out-woman-at-pride-parade/

And sometime after he brained the woman, he did an interview with The Whidbey Island Tattler. Not about how he almost killed someone in Seattle. But about he's been hired by the city of Oak Harbor to do aerial video filming, paid for by tax dollars:

http://www.whidbeynewstimes.com/news/329599491.html

I wonder what kind of FAA trouble he's in. Certainly he can't keep his drone certification, not after ignoring a bunch of regs and injuring someone. That's assuming The Feds can put two and two together.

Watching his videos flying directly above crowds, knowing one of his drones fell on someone, is alarming.






nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Nov 9, 2015 - 09:43pm PT
I'll look tomorrow.


I was informed today that we've been granted our 333 Exemption.



It's ON! Time to start a whole new life.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Nov 10, 2015 - 06:37pm PT
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11986847/Drone-may-have-been-involved-in-suspicious-death-of-police-horse.html
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Nov 12, 2015 - 09:47am PT
Seattle again:

http://www.king5.com/story/news/local/seattle/2015/11/11/seattle-great-wheel-hit-drone/75625830/

"Seattle Great Wheel hit by drone"

"The incident happened just after 4 p.m. Employees say they heard a loud "thud" and saw a drone had crashed onto a plastic table on an outdoor patio area. No one was hit."


Who do we know in The PNW who could do such a thing?

This guy, that's who:

http://www.whidbeynewstimes.com/news/339007401.html

"An Oak Harbor man who runs an aerial media firm is facing a criminal charge in Seattle because his drone crashed and allegedly struck a woman during the Seattle Pride Parade in June."

He didn't knock anybody out this time, so I guess he's sharpening his skills.

A disproportionate amount of lunacy in The PNW has a Whidbey Island connection.

Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Nov 12, 2015 - 11:07am PT
Maybe unrelated, maybe not; same mindset in many cases...

Lasers hit 20 aircraft flying in U.S. overnight - FAA

Nov 12 (Reuters) - Dangerous beams from handheld lasers struck 20 aircraft flying over the United States and its territories overnight, among the nearly 5,400 laser hits in the nation so far this year, the Federal Aviation Administration said on Thursday.

No injuries were reported in the incidents, which took place from New York City to Sacramento, and resulted in at least one arrest. Authorities said the incidents did not appear to be linked to each other.

"Shining a laser at an aircraft is a federal crime," the FAA said in a statement.

Laser beams can lead to temporary blindness in pilots and, in some cases, pilots have reported eye injuries that required medical treatment.

As of Oct. 16, the total number of laser strikes around the U.S. this year was 5,352, the FAA said.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/12/planes-laser-idUSL1N1372A920151112



Why are Americans becoming so crazy?
Todd Townsend

Social climber
Bishop, CA
Nov 12, 2015 - 11:32am PT
Here's a short film a buddy of mine shot recently at the Gunks. All the arial footage was done with a drone, as far as I know.

Enjoy.

[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Nov 12, 2015 - 12:32pm PT
My latest creation, all shot from flying wing drones, not your typical multirotor drone that everyone pictures when they hear the word drone. We have been flying these fixed wing drones much longer than multirotors, they go faster, go father, can carry more and are so much more fun...but whatever, ...everyone likes the silly multirotors and they sell, so it is what it is...

[Click to View YouTube Video]

There is a giant Worlds Competition next year being put on by the same guys that did the Nationals in Sac. But this time they will have a lot more classes and even fixed wing.

My team and I are looking for a brand or company to send us there as a sponsor if anyone is interested. It's difficult to take your hobby into the professional realm with events in Hawaii and entry costs in the hundreds.
Spiny Norman

Social climber
Boring, Oregon
Nov 12, 2015 - 12:44pm PT
The "it's just a tool" argument is shallow.

Tools are made for specific purposes and facilitate specific classes of actions. That is precisely why they are fabricated. Drones facilitate being a PITA (and possibly dangerous) shitheel.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Nov 12, 2015 - 01:48pm PT
Good Stuff squishy.

Todd - yeah, that's all shot with a sUA. I'd guess a phantom given the type of video quality.
squishy

Mountain climber
Nov 12, 2015 - 02:00pm PT
Drones, as you know them, and the way the word is used, is useless to this convo, it describes nothing useful for the conversation you wish you have, other than defining a remotely operated or autonomous vehicle. Including the RC car you had as a child. The word has existed for nearly 100 years, the tool since the 1930's. The only thing that has changed recently, is the technology to create very capable ones is accessible, that's a door that cannot be shut now, no matter how badly you wish it. even with Radio Shack out of business, lol RIP/./

The drones I fly, both multirotor and fixed wing, are very very purpose built. We design every aspect of our flying wings and multirotors for what we are doing with them, and we also hand build them. Some are designed to fly in and around objects (proximity) and be nimble and tough like mine, others for long range and efficiency (long flight times and long distance). We have race wings, race quads, and others with wide flight envelopes and so on. They are flying film cameras essentially and my video posted above demonstrates the purpose of my machines. If you are insinuating our "purpose built" craft can be used for other things (nefarious intent), you are simply ignorant. There's a lot that goes into flight that you might not be aware of (at every scale), and it's a lot harder than simply gluing a charge or grenade to one to make it a damaging guided missile. I won't get into all the details here, but even though we (FPV pilots) are capable, intent is what is more important now, not the tool (and it would still take a ill intended person years to gather my skill) Why? Because anyone with the internet and enough time can DIY any of this stuff, making the tool a common denominator and the intent or use of the tool the most important part...The best example is cars. They kill people all the time, they are a deadly weapon, they can be made into large bombs and have caused great harm in this country. But everyone has one, and we all don't go around asking each other if we are doing harm with them, it's simply assumed we use the tool the proper way (I am arguing you have no idea what the proper use is of drones like mine)...What I see here is a lot of people who have zero knowledge of the tool, how it's used or why or what and they all want to chime in with an opinion based on fear...from an outside perspective, I can see exactly why and how you think that way...trust that from where I sit, you look ignorant and I would love to educate everyone so this tool is well used and not abused (so what you say doesn't happen, because your disconnect with the tool is far more dangerous than ill intent because the consequences are not planned)..because whether or not they exist or are in our populous, is a sailed ship, so get over it..there are hundreds of drone in your neighborhood right now...Let's be more concerned about the education and experience of their operators more so than the tool itself, because that's what I am truly afraid of...not someone with a bomb on one, but idiots who cannot fly crashing into my daughter (only I get to do that).
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Nov 12, 2015 - 02:27pm PT
I quit using the word drone when referring to my commercial vehicles. When you see a NOTAM it's a UAS. The paperwork flying back and forth between me and the FAA refers to them as UA - unmanned aircraft.

The kids getting them for christmas - those are drones or whatever.

I could really care less what people call them. But your point is very valid, squishy. calling them drones really says not very much.

All the semantics aside we're pretty much legit at this point to operate commercially. I'm doing everything I can to allow Pagan and me to quit our go now where day jobs.

I'm in communication with someone doing a very well funded reef restoration project in Indonesia. If this heads in the right direction I'll be coordinating a project to do progressive surveys to quantitatively analyze how the reefs are growing. An idea I have is to compare aerial survey data with survey data acquired by divers. Could be the makings for a pilot project that can be applied globally.
squishy

Mountain climber
Nov 12, 2015 - 02:47pm PT
You guys want to see the problem with "drones"?

It's seen in people, and here is the latest example...I think these asshats almost get arrested or appear to in almost every video...in this one they happen to use a drone, but the point is, these guys are idoits...don't blame the drone, blame the idoits...

even me if I act like one while flying one, I and others hold our fellow pilots to high standards, as you all do of fellow drivers on the road with your cars...we need the same understanding and education with drones..and we need guys like this to get a beat-down...often...

[Click to View YouTube Video]
Spiny Norman

Social climber
Boring, Oregon
Nov 12, 2015 - 04:22pm PT
"The best example is cars. They kill people all the time, they are a deadly weapon, they can be made into large bombs and have caused great harm in this country."

Great harm, with considerably greater harm on the way.

I'm not saying drones should be banned. I am saying that the notion that tools are neutral is pernicious bullshit of the highest order. Indeed, you tacitly acknowledge precisely that point:

The drones I fly, both multirotor and fixed wing, are very very purpose built. We design every aspect of our flying wings and multirotors for what we are doing with them

Not a trace of neutrality there. The question is whether a given class of tools facilitates (though intent or accident) negative actions or outcomes. Cheap RC and autonomous drones, circa 2015, unquestionably facilitate negative actions and outcomes that were not likely or possible a decade ago. They also do incredibly cool things.

Should they be banned? Of course not. In fact the tech is changing so rapidly that I doubt regulation will be particularly effective due to the long lead times for same.

Rob Carlson, who writes mostly about biotechnology, had some useful thoughts three years (an eternity) ago.

What I am objecting to is the "tools are neutral, users are not" argument. That argument always has been, and always will be, shallow and obfuscatory. I linked to the Wiki article on the cobalt bomb not because I'm worried about drones with bombs (I'm not, particularly, unless you consider any guided missile or torpedo a drone) but because the cobalt bomb may be the single best example of a technology that is not — cannot — be, in any sense, neutral.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Nov 12, 2015 - 04:48pm PT
Scientists continue to struggle in vain to discover a cure for stupidity.

This, combined with their similar lack of success in developing a method of ridding the world of self-absorbed arseholes leads me to believe that a reliable method of identifying the owners of these machines is urgently required so that whoever is responsible for bringing down a commercial airliner (or perpetrating some other tragedy involving innocents) with one of these creations can be speedily located and lobotomized - that is, of course if he/she hasn't already undergone this procedure.
squishy

Mountain climber
Nov 19, 2015 - 04:11pm PT
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/19/us-usa-drones-intel-idUSKCN0T827920151119#XD2Bl1JKiZQtRBuC.97

"A federal government approach that is overly prescriptive regarding the deployment of new hardware and software will deter the private sector’s ability to invent and compete in the marketplace," Joshua Walden, Intel's senior vice president and general manager for new technology, said in written testimony submitted to the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade.


nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Nov 19, 2015 - 04:14pm PT
They are not the only ones thinking of relocating overseas because of the way the government is going about all of this.

I watched the senate subcommittee meeting on sUA today and boy was that a snoozer. they seem to not even understand what it is they are charged with figuring out.

oh well... whatever. at least we're legit finally.


http://www.dtaerialphoto.com
squishy

Mountain climber
Nov 23, 2015 - 12:10pm PT
squishy

Mountain climber
Nov 24, 2015 - 10:39am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Nov 24, 2015 - 11:11am PT
The FAA released a set of recommendations for drones yesterday, including registration and mandatory tail numbers. ( where's the tail?)

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/24/technology/proposed-regulations-for-drones-are-released.html?hpw&rref=technology&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=well-region®ion=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well&_r=0
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Nov 24, 2015 - 01:43pm PT
Where's the reference to tail number?

This registration process will not be the same as with N- (tail) numbers. And that's a good idea considering the hoops I'm jumping to get my vehicles their tail numbers.
squishy

Mountain climber
Nov 25, 2015 - 12:32pm PT
http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2015/11/25/woman-downs-neighbors-drone-with-gravel-ordered-to-pay-600/

Woman Downs Neighbor’s Drone With Gravel, Ordered To Pay $600
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Nov 30, 2015 - 04:51pm PT
Dick Cheney can shoot a republican donor without charges being brought.

Just claim you thought it was a republican.
squishy

Mountain climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 10:52am PT
DRONES ARE COOL!!!

[Click to View YouTube Video]
Mad Max

Trad climber
Bakersfield
Dec 4, 2015 - 11:40am PT
I shoot Sporting Clays pretty well (average 80+/100 score), just call me over and I can whack the drone with some 6&1/2 shot, its nearly harmless after it's flown its arc.
squishy

Mountain climber
Dec 9, 2015 - 10:22am PT
jonnyrig

climber
Dec 9, 2015 - 10:44am PT
In addition to entering the machines into a national database, the task force said, drone owners should display a government-issued registration number on each machine.
squishy

Mountain climber
Dec 11, 2015 - 11:52am PT
so...what's your point? That's grounds to ban the industry?

I think you are just starting to argue for the ban on manned aircraft, it's obviously too unsafe for them up there...times are a changing..
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Dec 11, 2015 - 12:40pm PT
http://mashable.com/2015/12/11/tokyo-police-net-drone-catcher/

[Click to View YouTube Video]

Now the drone chase-scene will have to become the standard in any high-octane action thriller.

And drones will get smaller... so:

[Click to View YouTube Video]
I seem to recall this "Malaria prevention" technique is funded by Gates Foundation... I wonder what are the intellectual property rights and who will fund the version sold to US Dept of Defense? Or maybe it will be more subtle like the US gov't committed to the next lame version of Windows, and the Gates Foundation has a program with a US-led health agency that also has a technology sharing agreement with "whatever branches of the US government that can make use of this life saving technology." I'll go get my tinfoil hat now.

And this will give rise to drone impersonation to match the "white list" that the lasers won't touch....

Oh where does the arms race end? Perhaps that is the only thing that creates jobs in the future?
squishy

Mountain climber
Dec 14, 2015 - 08:51am PT
“Make no mistake: unmanned aircraft enthusiast are aviators, and with that title comes a great deal of responsibility, I’m excited to welcome these new aviators into the culture of safety and responsibility that defines American innovation.” - U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx

https://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=19856

Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 14, 2015 - 09:32am PT
“Make no mistake: unmanned aircraft enthusiast are aviators, and with that title comes a great deal of responsibility, I’m excited to welcome these new aviators into the culture of prevarication and lack of accountability that defines American bureaucracy.” - U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx

^^^^That's what he should have said.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Dec 14, 2015 - 09:44am PT
http://www.faa.gov/uas/registration/

registration for our big bird came in last week - N627KX.
squishy

Mountain climber
Dec 14, 2015 - 10:33am PT

AMA Reacts to DOT UAS Registration Rule

MUNCIE, Ind. – Dave Mathewson, executive director of the Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) which is the world’s largest community-based organization, today made the following statement on the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) rule for small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) registration:

“AMA is disappointed with the new rule for UAS registration. As a member of the task force that helped develop recommendations for this rule, AMA argued that registration makes sense at some level and for UAS flyers operating outside the guidance of a community-based organization or flying for commercial purposes. Unfortunately, the new rule is counter to Congress’s intent in the Special Rule for Model Aircraft and makes the registration process an unnecessary burden for our more than 185,000 members who have been operating safely for decades.

“The Special Rule for Model Aircraft in the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 clearly states that the FAA is prohibited from promulgating any new rules for recreational users operating within the safety guidelines of a community-based organization (CBO). Meanwhile, the FAA’s contention that model aircraft should be considered aircraft is currently the subject of pending litigation. Congress by no means intended to grant a free pass to flyers within this system. Instead, it left risk mitigation and the development of appropriate safety guidelines to organizations like AMA.

“AMA’s eighty years of experience demonstrates that this voluntary, community-based approach to managing recreational flyers is highly effective. Our members follow a comprehensive set of safety and privacy guidelines, which are constantly evolving to accommodate new technologies and new modeling disciplines.

“At the same time, AMA understands that new legions of flyers need to be educated on how to fly safely and responsibly. That’s why AMA has been working closely with the FAA and the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) on the Know Before You Fly campaign. Education programs like these are one of the best ways to ensure the safety of our airspace.”

# # #

Background on the FAA Interpretative Rule of Section 336
On June 23, 2014, the FAA released its “Interpretation of the Special Rule for Model Aircraft,” (referred to as the “Interpretive Rule”), which imposed new restrictions on the use of model aircraft in direct contradiction to Section 336 and against the intent of Congress. The Interpretive Rule expands the definition of aircraft to include model aircraft, with which AMA disagrees. AMA has filed a petition to overturn the Interpretive Rule, which is still the subject of pending litigation.

About AMA
The Academy of Model Aeronautics, founded in 1936, continues to be devoted to national airspace safety. It serves as the nation’s collective voice for approximately 185,000 modelers in 2,400 clubs in the United States and Puerto Rico. Headquartered in Muncie, Indiana, AMA is a membership organization representing those who fly model aircraft for recreation and educational purposes. For more information, visit www.modelaircraft.org.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 14, 2015 - 07:47pm PT
Drones don't kill people, people kill people?
zBrown

Ice climber
Dec 14, 2015 - 08:16pm PT
How many cars have been hit by out of control drones?

I only know of one. Nobody was injured.

805 freeway

Mad Max

Trad climber
Bakersfield
Dec 15, 2015 - 08:32am PT
It will require a drone to take down an airliner full of real people to get them to stop quibbling about details and get some accountability talked about.
squishy

Mountain climber
Dec 15, 2015 - 09:14am PT
http://www.abc10.com/story/news/local/2015/12/15/drones-hot-new-gift-owners-now-required-to-register-drones/77340420/

[Click to View YouTube Video]
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Dec 15, 2015 - 10:04am PT
show off with the flip.
squishy

Mountain climber
Dec 15, 2015 - 10:29am PT
Don't be jelly...lol go practice..

totally unsafe flights in my neighborhood, that was a 4 cell minon on KISS18 and cobras. A quick little bird with a power to weight ratio that would make any craft cry, yet I still have a better one I just finished..I told them we really need to shoot these in a park next time to ripsomeballz! .com
squishy

Mountain climber
Dec 17, 2015 - 02:56pm PT
http://www.popsci.com/airplanes-hit-more-turtles-than-drones?src=SOC&dom=fb

http://thehill.com/policy/transportation/263164-critics-threaten-lawsuit-over-faa-drone-registration-rules

And:

Dear AMA Members,

Yesterday, the AMA Executive Council unanimously approved an action plan to relieve and further protect our members from unnecessary and burdensome regulations. This plan addresses the recently announced interim rule requiring federal registration of all model aircraft and unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) weighing between 0.55 and 55 pounds.

AMA has long used a similar registration system with our members, which we pointed out during the task force deliberations and in private conversations with the FAA. As you are aware, AMA's safety program instructs all members to place his or her AMA number or name and address on or within their model aircraft, effectively accomplishing the safety and accountability objectives of the interim rule. AMA has also argued that the new registration rule runs counter to Congress' intent in Section 336 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, otherwise known as the "Special Rule for Model Aircraft."

The Council is considering all legal and political remedies to address this issue. We believe that resolution to the unnecessary federal registration rule for our members rests with AMA's petition before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. This petition, filed in August 2014, asks the court to review the FAA's interpretation of the "Special Rule for Model Aircraft." The central issue is whether the FAA has the authority to expand the definition of aircraft to include model aircraft; thus, allowing the agency to establish new standards and operating criteria to which model aircraft operators have never been subject to in the past.

In promulgating its interim rule for registration earlier this week, the FAA repeatedly stated that model aircraft are aircraft, despite the fact that litigation is pending on this very question. The Council believes the FAA's reliance on its interpretation of Section 336 for legal authority to compel our members to register warrants the Court's immediate attention to AMA's petition.

While we continue to believe that registration makes sense at some threshold and for flyers operating outside of a community-based organization or flying for commercial purposes, we also strongly believe our members are not the problem and should not have to bear the burden of additional regulations. Safety has been the cornerstone of our organization for 80 years and AMA's members strive to be a part of the solution.

As we proceed with this process, we suggest AMA members hold off on registering their model aircraft with the FAA until advised by the AMA or until February 19, the FAA's legal deadline for registering existing model aircraft.

Holding off on registration will allow AMA time to fully consider all possible options. On a parallel track, it also allows AMA to complete ongoing conversations with the FAA about how best to streamline the registration process for our members.

In the near future, we will also be asking our members to make their voices heard by submitting comments to the FAA's interim rule on registration. We will follow-up soon with more detailed information on how to do this.

Thank you for your continued support of AMA. We will provide you with more updates as they become available.

Kind regards,

The AMA Executive Council

zBrown

Ice climber
Dec 17, 2015 - 05:29pm PT
I will withhold judgment until Trump comments on it, but I will observe that an errant drone almost caused an accident on the freeway in which someone could have died by striking an automobile traveling at 50 mph
squishy

Mountain climber
Dec 18, 2015 - 11:03pm PT
http://www.popsci.com/airplanes-hit-more-turtles-than-drones?src=SOC&dom=fb

"This fits into a larger portrait of how bad people are at assessing risk, whether that of plane crashes, cyberterrorist attacks, or even the liklihood of rain. Drones are new and easy to fear, while turtles are ancient and an accepted part of life. If a turtle on a runway isn’t that scary, maybe a drone flown five miles away from an airport shouldn’t be, either" -Kelsey D. Atherton
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Dec 22, 2015 - 06:44pm PT
Gravity doesn't sleep:

[Click to View YouTube Video]





Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 23, 2015 - 01:55pm PT
In a World Cup ski race yesterday Austrian champ Marcel Hirscher was very
nearly hit by a drone carrying a TV camera when it crashed! Nice!

Oops! Chaz beat me! Damn! That thing was huge! Luckily he is fast as
a lot of other racers woulda been hit!
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Dec 23, 2015 - 01:59pm PT
Be afraid,

Very afraid!

Land drones!

[Click to View YouTube Video]
Tung Gwok

Mountain climber
South Bend, Indiana
Dec 24, 2015 - 07:41am PT
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/12/24/rogue-toy-drones-interfering-with-military-operations/
Charlie D.

Trad climber
Western Slope, Tahoe Sierra
Jan 3, 2016 - 06:30pm PT
The earth abides:
craig morris

Trad climber
la
Jan 3, 2016 - 07:49pm PT
Lloyd Campbell

Social climber
St. Cloud, MN
Jan 3, 2016 - 08:37pm PT
I will withhold judgment until Trump comments on it, but I will observe that an errant drone almost caused an accident on the freeway in which someone could have died by striking an automobile traveling at 50 mph


It's pretty funny everyones so bent about the odd drone flying anywhere when, at any given time, about 75% of the people. driving 80+ mph around you on the highway are reading their email and sending inane texts instead of paying attention. I bet I see those idiots swerving in and out of their lanes about 80% of the time I'm driving on the highway. The odds one of those guys is going to take you out is so incredibly more likely, it's mind boggling. But lets act like drones are SO scary!!! Amazing.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jan 3, 2016 - 08:48pm PT

I pulled out the binocs for this one to make sure that there was no pattern traffic on the 45 entering the downwind for 8.

There wasn't.

Lloyd Campbell

Social climber
St. Cloud, MN
Jan 3, 2016 - 09:10pm PT
Oh Lloyd! There you go again.

That might be the most kettle and pot comment I've ever seen on any online forum.
Certainly in the top five all time. :-) :-)
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jan 3, 2016 - 09:13pm PT
As is our wont we went down to the end of the Rose Bowl Parade route to see the Stealth
Bomber fly down Colorado Blvd. Been doing this for 20+ years. About halfway along the
route we could see the bomber as a sliver suddenly bank about 15 degrees and swerve!
This is not a maneuver you want to do in a plane that size only 400' above the ground!
The rest of the way towards us it flew well off the centerline of the boulevard. There had
to have been a drone involved. I can't imagine any other reason for the
B-2 to make such a drastic maneuver so close to the ground. I'm not surprised
there's been nothing from the Air Force on this.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 3, 2016 - 10:17pm PT
So they fly a B2 bomber below 500 feet, which is typically unlawful to do for a lot of reasons, and then you are surprised when they run into one of those reasons? Got it, lol
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 3, 2016 - 10:18pm PT
They are the ones with souls on-board...who's the dumb one?
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 6, 2016 - 09:54am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Tung Gwok

Mountain climber
South Bend, Indiana
Jan 14, 2016 - 05:16am PT
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/01/13/you-may-be-powerless-to-stop-a-drone-from-hovering-over-your-own-yard/
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jan 14, 2016 - 09:10am PT
The truth lies somewhere between that click-bait title and how this sorts itself out. Boggs is pretty well known in the community. The accusation that he was using this to perv or spy is not adding up. At all. Many of my business associates in the community are contributing to his lawsuit for reasons I will lay out below.

The heart of his suit is this:

He argues in a lawsuit filed this month in U.S. District Court in Louisville that Merideth did not have the right to shoot the craft down because the government controls every inch of airspace in America.

And I believe that this is why he will lose the case. In the strictest sense of defining the NAS he's correct. However, we, as private citizens have a "reasonable right to privacy". That has been established in the couts. What has not been established is what that means in terms of this new technology. It's time that happenes.

So hopefully this court case at the very least, though even in a loss by Mr. Boggs, begins to define our rights to privacy while at the same time establishing where and how sUA operators can and cannot operate.

This technology is not going away. Just ask Amazon and Google. Thus this has to get sorted out.

I'm not contributing to Boggs' case but I do support him for taking one for the team. I do not support those that think they can just whip out a gun and start shooting. There are proper recourse's within the eyes of the law and they must be understood by everyone.

One of my commercial vehicles - N627KX - is considered to be the same as a manned aircraft. If you shoot at it or shoot it down you can be looking at $500K in fines and 10 years in jail.

Is that right? HELL NO. That penalty for that criminal offense was put in place for manned vehicles. But right now that's the law. So again, something else that needs to be sorted out in the courts.

And all this reminds me I need to call the Chief of Police here in Boulder back as in an effort of community outreach I'm working towards getting everyone to be on the same page.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 09:23am PT
The word "reasonable" is used in the definition of a great many things.

The word has a long standing tradition of being used simply because its definition is adaptive. And usually is measured by what is in use today.

For example, banks have been required to use "Commercially Reasonable Security" for decades and the definition essentially means "those methods currently in use by similarly situated financial institutions". Its nice in the sense that it floats to the "top" of common practice but as we are about to find out via the drone lawsuit, the term is not without its pitfalls.

The "reasonable expectation of privacy" may in fact expand to include a 'larger' sphere of privacy to extend out beyond the altitudes of modern cameras (which is quite a long way). However it might also shrink to a lower barometer due to the introduction of new technology.

I can say I still like seeing this get handled in the court of law by establishing what rights a person is entitled to vs. some banal registration scheme by .gov
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jan 14, 2016 - 09:33am PT
I can say I still like seeing this get handled in the court of law by establishing what rights a person is entitled to vs. some banal registration scheme by .gov

agreed on both points. however, the registration scheme is really intended to address what I view as the real problem - uneducated operators not people with nefarious intent.

I fail to understand why the first thing everyone asks me is "who are you going to spy on this with?". F*#king ridiculous. First, if I'm using one of my vehicles to look at people it's actually to look for people with my FLIR on a SAR mission. Because other than that I've zero interest in flying near people (mapping missions, etc.).

And seriously - if I wanted to spy on someone I'd pull out the 600mm lens and find a good angle with my dSLR. A loud upside-down lawnmower with a little camera with a wide angle lens is not the answer.

And worse is that means people are not asking the right question. What might be more appropriate is "who's head are you planning to drop that on?". Still a stupid question to ask a commercial operator but at least begins to get of the heart of what I view to be the real issue - public safety.

The reason the FAA AND the DOT did the banal registration process is because of public safety (FAA actually needed DOT because the FAA cannot promulgate new regulations however the DOT, in the interest of public safety can).

Your comments in regards to "reasonable" are spot-on as well. Let's hope it gets expanded those that do it for various nefarious activities get the legal beat down.

I've said it before and I'll say it again - I believe this technology can save lives and I intend to use it that way. I just came up with another idea on how to save the lives of sharks and people swimming in their home. F*#k those Aussies and their cull - there's a better way.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 09:55am PT
Apologies but I do not equate spurious government registration and a $15 stamp with a reduction of idiot operators. Not unless the registration stamp is lead and weighs 25 lbs including the adhesive.

There is a soft part of me that might be willing to accommodate registration in the case of commercial operators but even typing that makes me a little queasy.

Idiot operators are reduced when there are consequences for infringement on the rights of other people.

Having your drone shot down or being sued for any ignorant actions is a good place to start. And it seems the named lawsuit is a start.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jan 14, 2016 - 10:10am PT
Aside from the reasonable, if not valid, purposes that Nature will pursue the real value of
drones is the expansion of a brave new world of tort law which Nature might not be aware of
virtually ended the general aviation industry until laws enacted by Republicans brought it
back from the dead.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jan 14, 2016 - 10:28am PT
You would be correct in your observation regarding zombie tort law. This world of aviation and the FAA, as you know, is new to me. It's fascinating to say the least and never before in my life have I been involved in the political system like I am now (watching CSPAN sub-committee hearings, etc.).

I'd just like to see the FAA get their sh#t together and get Part 107 finalized. A guy can dream. (though at the same time the longer they take the better it is for me since we have FAA 333 Exemption and can operate commercially).

Check this one out: since the FAA is taking sooo loooong to finalize there is now legislation that is being proposed by a group of sUA advocates that is trying to supercede the FAA and put congress in charge - it essentially says you need to take a 1-2 hour online course and pass a test. I'm pretty sure the test is comprised of one question - "What does NAS stand for?". I'm so adamantly opposed to this it makes my blood boil (and it's not because of the $11K invested to get my PPL so that I can fly a small Unmanned Aircraft commercially).
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 10:35am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]]
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 14, 2016 - 11:10am PT
I went out flying on Sunday, we contacted the tower at Mather, contacted the airport manager, contacted law enforcement. We are not 333 except, we are not registered, we are not AMA member...

We flew for hours without incident, we flew the pirate flag off the back of a car, we obeyed all regulations of the airspace as responsible users.

This is the golden age of drone freedom. Take advantage of it while it lasts. Like the 1950's in the Valley...it's over with now...ruined by fear and ignorance..

on the 19th I will be forced to register myself, not my aircraft. My personal info goes into a insecure and public database where it sits waiting for me to do something wrong. In order to register myself I have to check a few boxes, saying I will never do what I am currently doing and enjoying (FPV, BLOS, within5 miles of airports).

What have we done or the government or the FAA done to make you feel safe? Anything? Because all they have currently done in my eyes, is make me feel less safe...that is not why I pay taxes, that is not why I submit to the rule of law. I understand the greater good, I am a public servant, a US Army vet a free citizen...why it is that my actions or hobby is so threatening to you that regulation taking my rights away must be enacted?

Part of me wants just just go deeper, find new steal technology, hop my RF video and keep doing what I'm doing. We can you know, we can fly at night, we can use new channels, we can simply build new craft that cannot be caught. And we have enough passion for this to accomplish it.

what the FAA has done is take perfectly safe people and turn them into criminals and put them on a list, where civil disobedience is looking more and more favorable than playing a long with the law, and that is unsafe in my opinion, and that's why you need to meet them half way and have a common sense discussion resulting in regulations that step on no one's rights..it's simple..there's a million ideas out there on how to do it, but the FAA works in a vacuum of stall old man air...taken out to lunch by the aviation industry lobbyists with giant piles of money...is it any wonder that drones are being demonized by the very industry they are posed to replace? Come on..big fat duh...

Lemme ask you this, universally, not personally.. Do you think it's better to have people in helicopters flying around town chasing bad guys or reporting on the traffic? Or do you feel those tasks can be better suited to a drone where a soul is not at risk of falling from the sky and cratering? common sense right? that what we mean when we say common sense regulation and responsible discussions. It appears that the existing aviation industry wants to hold back progress, to hold back the drone revolution...but they cannot, they will not...it is the future, whether you or they or anyone hates it. Our children with come along, embrace drones, look at you like your idoits and they will make them better, they will work with them, not against them, and drone will improve every aspect of human life...like the dishwasher, the car, the airplane...it's another tool...and the result will be more leisure time for humans, to go off and do sh#t like climbing...
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 11:18am PT
Yeah, that's all well and good squishy. But the $15 stamp registration scheme will give jobs to a lot of people that didn't have them previously. Suck it up buttercup.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 14, 2016 - 11:27am PT
lol, the drone industry and it's hyper market is already creating jobs, tons of them...we do not need regulation to do that, in fact the movers and shakers in the industry like me out here fighting it because these regulations will slow growth, not increase it. After the last media interview I received several notes from FPV and drone manufactures thanking me for what I say...the 15 dollars and the bureaucracy that will stand up to facilitate is all is public, and also expensive, believe me I am sitting in one right now (state office).

The registration is a simple online and insecure DB, there is minimal staff required to do any of the existing actions. Communications went out to all law enforcement in the country with a guide on how to look up the stuff, and they required people to all go to the website and reg. The 15 is waved for people like me, we are all grandfathered.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 14, 2016 - 12:11pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 02:49pm PT
You're preaching to the Archbishop here squishy.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 16, 2016 - 07:57pm PT
You're preaching to the Archbishop here squishy.

Naw, I'm trolling in the milktoast..
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 19, 2016 - 07:44pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Jan 20, 2016 - 07:06am PT
I live 4.1/2 miles out at the end of a dirt road and would expect some privacy. If I google myself and do a tiny bit of digging there is an ariel shot of my house. that completly sucks. I totally dig model airplanes and find it fascinating to watch them fly. I have never owned one but watched them fly a few times and it's wicked cool. drones on the other hand are not about flying as much as they are about spying. I understand they have their good uses but for the most part a drone free sky is a good thing.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jan 20, 2016 - 07:18am PT
how do you know it was an sUA that took the image? I'm not aware of google using anything other than manned craft.
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Jan 20, 2016 - 07:55am PT
They acually drove out to our private circle with their car that has a shitload of cameras on the roof. Who or what took the photo is imaterial. it sucks. drones primary purpose seems to be spying. for the most part that sucks. great for inspecting power lines and hazerdous train wreck spills and fires etc. bad for snooping on private property. I think if someone had a sizeable property say 10 acers or more they should be allowed to aply for a permit to shoot down drones that violate their airspace by 200m ;)
Dapper Dan

Trad climber
Redwood City
Jan 20, 2016 - 10:17am PT
drones primary purpose seems to be spying

^^^ This assumption is so dumb, ignorant, and narcissistic. No one I know who takes the hobby seriously, learns about drone flying, and spends significant time and cash to fly, is the least bit interested in flying over your mundane property or life . Most I know love the thrill of the (video) shot , flying long distance, or stunt flying ...
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 20, 2016 - 10:37am PT
Wow, just wow...
hagerty

Social climber
A Sandy Area South of a Salty Lake
Jan 20, 2016 - 10:43am PT
drones primary purpose seems to be spying

^^^ This assumption is so dumb, ignorant, and narcissistic. No one I know who takes the hobby seriously, learns about drone flying, and spends significant time and cash to fly, is the least bit interested in flying over your mundane property or life . Most I know love the thrill of the (video) shot , flying long distance, or stunt flying ...


Perhaps if the manufacturers stopped calling them "spy drones"?
http://www.amazon.com/Striker-2-4GHz-4-5CH-Spy-Drone/dp/B00X6FMZTU
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 20, 2016 - 10:57am PT
Are you people that naive?

Do you even know what kind of picture we get in the live feed? Here's an example...

[Click to View YouTube Video]
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jan 20, 2016 - 01:26pm PT
Unfortunately, Tradmans view is probably fairly common.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 20, 2016 - 01:28pm PT
Its also paid for by rotor-craft lobbyists and has been for the last two years. The existing infrastructure and helicopter manufacturers are attacking and vilifying drones and you sheeple are eating it up, hook line and sinker...
overwatch

climber
Jan 20, 2016 - 01:57pm PT
Anti-drone conspiracy enacted by the helicopter industry?

I love a good conspiracy.
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Jan 20, 2016 - 07:08pm PT
Everyone who flys one of those things has a video running. yes that is fcking annoying.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 20, 2016 - 07:24pm PT
Everyone who flys one of those things has a video running. yes that is fcking annoying.

So because I am rolling video and out in the middle of nowhere doing loops and rolls to rock and roll, I am "annoying" you?

Dude, do you realize what you sound like?



Can anyone confirm or not, that this guy has a mental illness that may be contributing this delusion?
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Jan 20, 2016 - 08:01pm PT
You do not annoy me when you are out in the middle of nowhere by yourself. If you flew over my house with that thing I would be annoyed. If you buzz me while I am climbing I will be annoyed unless it is a still photo shoot that we arranged prior to the climb. that would be cool as heck to do some photo shoots from those angles. It would however be seriously intrudeing on everyones outdoor climbing experience to do the photo shoot all day or a bunch of days in a row.. even doing the shoot once would intrude on other peoples outdoor experience. Do it early and catch the early morning light then put that thing away. keep the flight short and sweet. you will still piss some people off.
squishy

Mountain climber
Jan 22, 2016 - 10:15am PT
None of that addressed the ignorance of your original statement or my reaction to it. You are spewing common sense, sense that the experienced drone pilot has. It's just insulting really. Please educate yourself on the subject before forming an opinion, let alone voicing.

drones primary purpose seems to be spying
That statement is insulting and ignorant...and it's what I was reacting too. All that other fluff about flying near people and all that crap is not what was being talked about. and if you see people doing that, they are noobs, they are complete idiots with money who went to Frys and bought one. They are not drones pilots or experienced in any way...to equate me to them, is also insulting. You are making a tons of assumptions and reacting to them, why?


Recently a big drone company put out this picture on FB, this is what I would be more interested in you having an opinion on...

This was taken by "Team Parrot" a large European drone company and the 1st to ever market the craft as "drones" in malls, as far back as 2008.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jan 22, 2016 - 10:18am PT
^^^^ Is that Sloan about to go work?
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Jan 23, 2016 - 09:09am PT
squishy it is not fcking ignorant. It is a simple fact of life that the most high profile use of drones in our time is by our govt to spy on and kill people. lots of people and many if not most are innocent Colateral dammage. there is often legit good uses for military concepts in the private sector and drones are no exception but they do carry the stigma of being a spy tool. I don't want a drone over my house or my campsight. If you can't grasp that buzzing someones house or campsight is intrusive you should not be allowed to fly. End of fcking story.

I don't really like snowmobiles, dirt bikes , ATV's or jet skies either so don't feel singled out.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jan 23, 2016 - 09:34am PT
But you're OK with the cops and the TV news flying over your house? Even though - unlike drones with their wide-angle lenses - the cops and TV news helicopters all carry cameras with powerful zoom capabilities that make El Cap Pics' equipment look like a toy.
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Jan 23, 2016 - 09:50am PT
No i am not Ok with cops or TV news flying over my house.
Bushman

Social climber
Elk Grove, California
Jan 23, 2016 - 10:03am PT
Thanks to the people who misused their drones and to the huge comercial drone ventures, we in the RC model plane hobby who have been members of the Academy of Model Aeronautics for many years, had to register our planes with the FAA and put a 'UAS' number on all our aircraft.

Sucks how only a few people can make things difficult for the majority.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Feb 1, 2016 - 11:10am PT
The Dutch police are training Eagles to capture drones.

http://gizmo.do/CbBvORZ

Ahwahnee Bartender

Big Wall climber
Fog Town
Feb 1, 2016 - 02:56pm PT
I was one of the masses to receive a Christmas Drone from my lady. Here is a shot of my apartment that is *almost* falling off the cliff in Pacifica. Our neighbors have been red tagged but we are still safe - for now. I didn't realize how bad it really was until I took the drone out for a quick look see. As you can see, we are truly "Living On The Edge"

[Click to View YouTube Video]
neebee

Social climber
calif/texas
Feb 1, 2016 - 05:46pm PT
hey there say, ahwahnee bartender, oh my! and man oh man...

say, (nice quiet video) oh my, what will you do??
i remember wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy back, when these things FIRST started
'happening' along the coast and houses either fell in, or near abouts,
had such things going on...

never did 're learn' or keep up with this, though, as i moved from calif, to south texas, and a few other moves...

oh my... say, sadly, it seems a good typhon could take it all down???


prayers, hope you can resolve this somehow... oh my...


:O
squishy

Mountain climber
Feb 23, 2016 - 12:52pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Feb 23, 2016 - 12:52pm PT
No i am not Ok with cops or TV news flying over my house.

You should shoot them down then, they do it all the time...
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Feb 25, 2016 - 08:29am PT
A new low in irresponsibility...


[Click to View YouTube Video]

The phukwad probably pressed charges agin the 'lope.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Feb 25, 2016 - 09:01am PT
For that kind of work, you need a kite.



So quiet, they never know you're there.
squishy

Mountain climber
Feb 25, 2016 - 08:20pm PT
no way man! That's awesome Chaz ...I wish my craft were as silent and stealthy, maybe some day...
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 2, 2016 - 07:26am PT
A new low in irresponsibility...

So true.



Now this, from Utah. Who apparently has been feeling a bit left out in the fascism department lately.

PROPOSED UTAH BILL TO LET POLICE SHOOT DOWN DRONES

http://www.wideopenspaces.com/proposed-utah-bill-to-let-police-shoot-drones/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WOS_Daily_nb_3.2-western&utm_term=MT/ID/SD/ND/UT/WY%20-%20western

Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 2, 2016 - 07:32am PT
PROPOSED UTAH BILL TO LET POLICE SHOOT DOWN DRONES

I'd buy the ammo but the cops are always putting out PSA's on New Year's Eve not to
shoot guns into the sky and given the level of police marksmanship usually displayed
it is hard to view this as other than a joke.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 2, 2016 - 07:43am PT
Apparently No Fly Zones were not enough to restrict the media from covering less desirable actions by our LEO's, they needed to give them an excuse that rides above the common man's rights.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Mar 2, 2016 - 07:48am PT
Be careful what you send the cops out to shoot.

The cops in my neighborhood shot someone's housecat, thinking it was a Mountain Lion.

http://www.redlandsdailyfacts.com/article/ZZ/20060502/NEWS/605029923

"The incident occurred in an area where residents have repeatedly reported mountain lion sightings. In fact, the bear treed itself just a block from where, in 2004, a large house cat was mistaken for a mountain lion and shot and killed by police"

The news story, apparently, the Redlands Police thought a Grizzly Bear had wondered into town, probably came here from Idaho.
overwatch

climber
Arizona
Mar 2, 2016 - 07:56am PT
The news story, apparently, the Redlands Police thought a Grizzly Bear had wondered into town, probably came here from Idaho.

Probably somebody's Chow running loose
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Mar 2, 2016 - 08:01am PT
That "brown bear" and house cat were only a mile from my house. Thankfully, the County Sheriff covers things here, when they feel like it, not the Redlands Police.

My neighbors and I call each other when we spot something like that. We've talked about it, and we're certainly not calling the cops.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 2, 2016 - 09:02am PT
Probably somebody's Chow running loose

lol
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 2, 2016 - 10:04am PT
I bet the LEOs in Utah are all verklempt at the thought of the firepower, SAM missiles and freshly offered MRAP mounted anti-aircraft gunning surplus they can get from the DHS garage sale to shoot down drones with.
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Mar 15, 2016 - 07:56pm PT
If these findings are accurate, its good news that drones might not be such a threat to aircraft:

http://www.cio.com/article/3043788/drones-present-minimal-threat-to-aircraft-says-study.html

Using data on bird strikes, study estimates danger from consumer drones is minor

Just how likely is it that a drone hits an aircraft and causes a death or injury? Not very, according to research from George Mason University. The study suggests the Federal Aviation Administration could significantly loosen rules regarding private drone use and not endanger general aviation.

Citing a number of "near misses" with drones, the FAA recently began requiring pilots to register before flying their drones and agree to abide by several basic rules of the sky. Almost 400,000 pilots have registered in the last three months, the FAA said on Monday.

The FAA's requirement, covering drones weighing over 250 grams (0.55 pounds), got George Mason University research fellow Eli Dourado thinking: Just how dangerous might drones be?

He started by turning to the FAA's wildlife strike database, a voluntary database of incidents involving animal strikes with aircraft, and married that with an estimate of 10 billion birds in U.S. airspace. He looked at the amount of time the birds spend flying and where bird strikes happened. He also drew on an FAA database of the average weight per species.

The result?

"A two-kilogram drone would cause an injury once every 187 million years of continuous operation," he said.

Put another way, with a million drones in the sky flying continuously, they'd lead to an accident that would cause an injury or death once every 187 years.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 15, 2016 - 08:07pm PT
Not a chance. There is a gap in the legislation of drones and government is dead set to fill the void.
squishy

Mountain climber
Mar 17, 2016 - 03:53pm PT
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/03/researchers-say-faa-is-really-overblowing-risk-posed-by-small-drones/

Science! It's true whether or not you or your governance wishes to believe it. "... the researchers estimated that for every 100,000 hours of flight time for drones weighing up to 2 kilograms, there would be 0.00000612 collisions causing damage to aircraft. "Or to put it another way," the pair wrote, "one damaging incident will occur no more than every 1.87 million years of 2kg UAS flight time."
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Mar 17, 2016 - 03:58pm PT
Big sky -- little bullet
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Mar 17, 2016 - 09:08pm PT
Drone up to no good.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Mar 18, 2016 - 01:06am PT
the drone designation is irrelevant

this thread is really about privately controlled vehicles that have partly escaped the compulsive regulators by operating in a domain that is kept under tight political and military control

i spent several years of my life as lead systems engineer at NASA NextGen, developing the risk management plan for the next generation air traffic management system…which of course included the implications of UAVs introduced into the air space system (we neglected to include the risk of having the police authorized to shoot them down!)

many commercial and military aircraft are quite capable of flying their schedules or missions with no on-board pilot input…and hence could be termed drones…note the UAV X-47 taking off and landing on a carrier…not to mention many modern airliners...

NextGen is a typical FAA major federal program trying to predict and regulate what has already happened…leading from behind…as pilots like me with a pocket GPS can do better navigation than their outmoded controlled airspace system

It is intriguing to watch the compulsive regulators attempting to regulate un-regulateable drone excursions into their self-assigned domains of control

this thread is a great sociology exercise with knowledgeable contributors examining innovative technology developments confronting the cultural immunity syndrome exhibited by people with archaic world views

the massive implications of practical software to manage the stability and control of multi-rotor aerial vehicles is only beginning to be felt…note 50 years of work by Hans Moller and his latest m400 skycar - a hovercraft that can take off from your back yard and hover out of ground-effect and cruise long distances on a bypass of both the overstressed and under maintained federal highway system and the air transportation system designed in the 1930s

the political/military controllers have struggled for the entire history of aviation to prevent practical vehicles able to transition seamlessly from ground transportation to air transportation under private control…as this grants people a much greater degree of travel freedom…particularly if you stick to uncontrolled airspace and outside of radar coverage (as i generally prefer in my own airplane)

TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Mar 18, 2016 - 01:49am PT
so it would be nice if i could use a drone to inspect my aircraft while in flight…particularly to check that the gear is down and locked in the landing configuration…or anytime something doesn't sound quite right...

so what are the legal implications if i launch a small drone from a dock under the hull and fly it around for an inflight inspection…or perhaps to inspect something else such as an emergency landing zone...

btw i cruise at 200 mph and slow down to 100 mph in the airport landing pattern

(as a precedent, the tender for a documented yacht is considered to be covered under the registration of the parent vessel)
squishy

Mountain climber
Mar 18, 2016 - 11:14am PT
this thread is a great sociology exercise with knowledgeable contributors examining innovative technology developments confronting the cultural immunity syndrome exhibited by people with archaic world views

DAT'S WUT I BEEN TRYIN TO SAY, YO!!

but dingus is a dingus dong, lol.

Also, the bubble is already popping before the main stream realized it was there, lol

https://dronemapping.wordpress.com/2016/03/15/commercial-drone-operations-are-a-fad/

squishy

Mountain climber
Mar 18, 2016 - 03:02pm PT
You equating peeping toms with drones is like equating yourself with youth...lol
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 19, 2016 - 05:42am PT
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-california-drone-lufthansa-idUSKCN0WL01B

Thank god California has Senator Fienstein. Maybe she can introduce some legislature to control the birds flying around LA too? They used to sh#t on my truck and I hated that.



The pilot of a Lufthansa passenger jumbo jet reported a drone aircraft nearly collided with the airliner on Friday on its landing approach to Los Angeles International Airport, according to the Federal Aviation Administration.

The close encounter between the wide-body, four-engine Airbus A380 and the drone occurred at about 1:30 p.m. at an altitude of 5,000 feet (152 meters) as the unmanned aircraft passed about 200 feet (61 meters) over the Lufthansa flight 14 miles (22.5 km) east of the airport, the FAA said.

No evasive action was taken by the airline crew, and the plane, Lufthansa Flight 456, safely made its landing minutes later without further incident, according to FAA spokesman Ian Gregor.

The FAA immediately alerted the Los Angeles Police Department's air support division.

The number of passengers and crew aboard the plane was not reported by authorities, nor was the flight's origin.

U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, who has introduced legislation to require new safety features on drones, pointed to the close call as an example of the hazards posed to commercial aviation by unregulated drone activity.

"This is one more incident that could have brought down an airliner, and it's completely unacceptable," she said in a statement.

Federal regulations generally bar drone aircraft and model airplanes from flying higher than 400 feet (122 meters) or within 5 miles (8 km) of an airport without first contacting air traffic control and airport authorities. Operators also must keep their drones away from other aircraft and groups of people.

The FAA has received at least 42 reports of drones flying unsafely near LAX, the nation's second-busiest airport, since April 2014, according to a Los Angeles Times analysis last fall of federal data released by Feinstein.

The data shows nearly 200 pilot reports of close encounters involving drones in California alone during the past two years, the most of any state, according to the Times.

In a 2014 letter to the FAA, Feinstein cited three instances in which drones flew dangerously close to passenger planes near major airports - two on the same day in May of that year at New York City's LaGuardia Airport and LAX, and another at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York in March 2013.

Responding to heightened concerns about rogue drone flights near airports, the FAA issued a rule in December requiring hobbyists as young as 13 to register their unmanned aircraft online with the government.

(Reporting by Steve Gorman; Editing by Sandra Maler and Michael Perry)
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Mar 19, 2016 - 10:33pm PT
note one of the reasons we can go flying around up there is that humans have caused massive depopulation of the birds up there

two hundred years ago it would have been challenging to find uninhabited airspace below a few thousand feet of altitude

it is very common for aircraft to nearly run into birds during takeoff…pilots don't usually mention this to non pilots…

this is also one of the major reasons for flying airplanes above 500 feet

we (except for glider pilots) also tend to avoid ridge lines with strong updrafts due to the presence of soaring birds at higher altitudes

likewise above landfills, fishing harbors, and active agricultural cultivation

i know at least one seagull that actively seeks out and attacks small UAVs…which are being used regularly by one of my friends for rescuing injured wildlife...

all the negative press about small UAVs is just designed to get the public willing to support attempts to regulate them
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 20, 2016 - 09:31am PT
about small UAVs is just designed to get the public willing to support attempts to regulate them

So our concerns are no more than our concerns about children running with sharpened
pencils? I acknowledge that a one pound drone would probably not bring down even an
RJ but some of these larger ones could quite possibly. At the very least it would entail a
new engine but I suppose that is the price we should pay to indulge our fantasies about
personal freedom?
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 20, 2016 - 09:40am PT
Please no need to propose bans of kids running with sharpened pencils.

We've lost the battle regarding drones, but by gollly some people might actually draw the line at kids with pencils.

Or, probably not...

I will anticipate pencil legislation forthcoming from the good senator from the People's Republik of Kalifornia shortly.
hooblie

climber
from out where the anecdotes roam
Apr 5, 2016 - 11:38am PT
from what i've seen (& been aware) of drone videography, the opening scene from last night's
(season 2 episode 8) "better call saul" is likely state of the art for the platform:

http://www.amc.com/shows/better-call-saul/full-episodes/season-02/episode-08/fifi

it starts behind a smugglers truck in the line-up at a border crossing, pulls back to establish the scene as the agents direct it to secondary inspection, flies through the building to observe product in the load, ultimately looking over a shoulder at a laptop screen.

some pilot and camera operator exchanged high-fives (carefully) after that one, i'm sure.
best take out some policy on those hands, them are good ones

available for viewing for the next 29 days


squishy

Mountain climber
Apr 17, 2016 - 03:14pm PT
Hey dingus your dream came true, a drone hit a passenger plane...it bounced off...the plane is cleared for service tomorrow...

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-36067591

(Post was deleted from the Phantom 4 Owners group, here it is again) "During my stopover at Heathrow, I went spotting. Saw an odd fellow flying a drone, but I decided not to engage in a conversation because he looked far too focused in what he was doing. Just minded my own business and took good pictures of incoming traffic until I saw his drone seemingly hit an aircraft on final then just bounce off and crash near me. (I could have been hit). It was demolished. I'm a U.S citizen so I guess I contact the FAA? This happened in the UK though so I'm not sure who to contact best. I'll try telling customs once I land at Kennedy."
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Apr 17, 2016 - 05:50pm PT
I was with my kids at Castle Rocks State Park today, no roped climbing, just scrambling around and we hung out in the cave atop Goat Rock. After a while I thought I heard a landscaping crew coming through with leaf blowers. It was a serious racket, fully disturbing the peace of the place. To be fair, it was a crowded day there, not exactly a wilderness experience, but still with all the people, we felt reasonably isolated in the cave where non-climbers don't usually walk the ridgeline and downclimb to reach.

Anyhoo, I was more than a bit frustrated when I saw the drone. I do appreciate the video perspective of drones, but it just is not worth the amount of disturbance to all the people who came out of a city to enjoy a bit of peace and quiet in a natural setting.

We need no fly zones in natural parklands... they should be legal in the same sorts of places where off-road vehicles are legal. BLM, US Forest Service, etc.... not in landscapes where hiking trails are the only intrusions into the natural environment.
squishy

Mountain climber
Apr 19, 2016 - 04:28pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Apr 28, 2016 - 10:32am PT
Oh no Dingus, sorry bro, turns out the drone in the UK was just a bag or something...another false alarm...looks like the false alarms are still a 100% record, all reported drone strikes, have turned out to be bogus. I wonder if the pilots are "seeing drones"?

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/technology/heathrow-drone-collision-reversal-1.3556697
squishy

Mountain climber
Apr 28, 2016 - 10:45am PT
I should collect all the plastic bag memes the drone industry has created over the last week, might make you laugh...

I mean, come on, those things are scary bro..
squishy

Mountain climber
May 2, 2016 - 11:49am PT
http://hackaday.com/2016/05/02/debunking-the-drone-versus-plane-hysteria/

Unidentified objects in the air have been a feature of aviation since the first fliers took to the skies. They have been variously explained at different times as birds, weather balloons, secret Nazi weapons, Russian spies, or even alien invaders, but the common thread when you come down to it is that nobody has a clue what they really are. It seems that the current Flavour Of The Month when you have a sighting is to blame it on a drone, but that default identification seems about as meaningful in this context as it was when people were blaming aliens.

overwatch

climber
Arizona
May 2, 2016 - 11:50am PT
wwwwwwhhhhhhooooooooo CARES!
Flip Flop

climber
Earth Planet, Universe
May 2, 2016 - 06:10pm PT
Can I shoot down a bothersome drone? Say with another drone? I want that freedom.
squishy

Mountain climber
May 23, 2016 - 10:08pm PT
Can I shoot down a bothersome drone? Say with another drone? I want that freedom.

sure why not..you could even go pro dude...

[Click to View YouTube Video]
weezy

climber
May 23, 2016 - 10:19pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
May 23, 2016 - 10:20pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
May 24, 2016 - 07:50am PT
check this out
http://fox40.com/2016/05/23/regulation-creates-challenges-confusion-for-drone-hobbyists/
Dapper Dan

Trad climber
Redwood City
May 24, 2016 - 08:09am PT
A quick video I made from last weekend up on hwy. 4...

[Click to View YouTube Video]
Trashman

Trad climber
SLC
May 24, 2016 - 10:52am PT
Drone Buster!

Inconvenient, but worth it for a quieter day at the crag. Unfortunate that GFYS isn't an executable command though.
squishy

Mountain climber
May 25, 2016 - 10:12pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
May 26, 2016 - 09:37pm PT

You what is allowed up there at Point Arena?



KITES. That's what.


Even though there's a kite hanging in one of the trees right next to the heliport.

Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 27, 2016 - 05:28am PT
That kite might damage the historic lighthouse....
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Jun 8, 2016 - 06:57am PT
Judge says drone slayer is spot on.
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 8, 2016 - 08:56am PT
I had a somewhat *close encounter* with a drone on Saturday, while I was flying a kite at a State Park in Washington.

My kite was flying about 400' above the Keystone Ferry Landing, and I was getting shots of the Coupeville-to-Port Townsend ferries as they pulled into and out of the dock. About the time I figured I'd got what I came for, and was starting to pull everything back in, I noticed a drone buzzing around my kite.

Drones are prohibited there, but I wasn't concerned about that any more than I cared if someone was smoking or letting their dogs run loose. Not my job. It was "free admission day", so you're going to get those types on a day like that. Besides, that was only the second drone I've ever seen in my life, so I'm no judge of responsible drone operation. It looked to me like he had everything under control.

And I knew that if we tangled, the drone would certainly get the worst of it, most likely crash into The Puget Sound and never be seen again, while my gear would all survive to fly another day. The best the drone could hope for would be to get tangled up in my kite string, so I could fish it out of The Sound. A kite-aerial photographer in Philadelphia has been testing drone-on-kite smash-ups, and he's found there's no way to take down a kite with a drone. Especially a big kite like the ones we use to fly cameras. Can't even make a noticeable nick in the kite string with one. The worst is if the drone tears a hole in the kite fabric, but the hole's never big enough to do anything to really effect the kite's flying. The drone, however, gets knocked off its locus, and falls to the ground because at that point it is no longer an aircraft. So I wasn't worried.

What I did find odd was the drone's choice of subjects for his photos. He was apparently trying to get photos of my kite. Why the hell anyone would want pictures of an old, faded, chewed on by a goat delta kite ( albeit dependable and straight-flying ) is beyond me. Especially when Fort Casey State Park has so many other potential subjects to photograph, like the ten-inch guns, a lighthouse, ferries and other boats. And why anyone would risk a thousand-dollar drone - and drawing the ire of the authorities - to get shots of an old kite is a mystery.

I wanted to talk to him, maybe trade photos and just shoot the sh#t for a while, but by the time I got my stuff down and wrapped up, he was gone. Knowing how dangerous a flying kite can be to a drone, I didn't want to walk over to where he was until my stuff was down and out of his way. I wanted to suggest to him to fly about 200' lower, where my camera was, instead of up next to the kite, so I'd have a shot at getting pics of his drone. But no luck. I had to be content with photos of the marine traffic on the water.

I'll bet none of the drone's shots looked like this:




If this becomes a common thing, I'll look for a way to put a note on my kite reading "yer gonna need a bigger drone".

zBrown

Ice climber
Jul 25, 2016 - 06:28pm PT
This isn't about drones, but it is about all the stuff flying around over my head.

Does anyone know if there is a publicaly available source enumerating all the planes flying around over me.

I know we have traffic from the military bases, the airport in Tijuana, local airports, etc.

But anyway to get a handle on how much and from where.

Reilly?
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jul 25, 2016 - 06:51pm PT
These might work:

http://flightaware.com/live/

http://www.flightradar24.com/34.12,-117.33/7

It won't detect drones, because those drone guys are sneaky SOBs.
zBrown

Ice climber
Jul 26, 2016 - 08:03am PT
Thanks Chaz. I have not seen any of these (yet).








Franz Kruckenberg, German aircraft engineer built the Schienenzeppelin in 1929
zBrown

Ice climber
Jul 26, 2016 - 06:12pm PT
Isn't the red bar supposed to be on top of what is being "X'd" out of society?

nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 26, 2016 - 07:17pm PT
http://kdvr.com/2016/07/21/finding-geno-dozens-plan-to-join-search-for-dog-missing-since-cold-springs-fire/

I've helped organize a number of teams to go search for Geno tomorrow stupid early. We'll all be flying banned drones equipped with FLIR cameras.

They've been searching for two weeks. Such a sad story. The firefighter that owns him was trying to save his neighbors houses while his burned to the ground. Geno apparently bailed.

Hopefully with can find him on thermal from the air holed up near water.

#bringgenohome
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 27, 2016 - 07:30pm PT
We tried hard today and we're not giving up.

The guy in this video says he can go four to six weeks.

http://kdvr.com/2016/07/27/drones-join-search-for-geno-the-dog-missing-since-nederland-wildfire/

(still need to check with Aya on that number but regardless we'll be back).

And I fuking hate the fact the news clips was because of someone's lost loved one. FUK!



as an aside I hit up Tarbuster to brainstorm and talk about the terrain. He knows it beter than anyone. Good visit.
zBrown

Ice climber
Jul 30, 2016 - 09:30am PT
The flight radar site Chaz pointed to, is pretty cool.


https://www.flightradar24.com/32.74,-117.23

I just checked and there are no planes over San Onofre.



Of course you have to have the right equipment. Hope no terrorists are watching the site.

Aircraft visible on Flightradar24 (within ADS-B coverage)
When ADS-B was initially launched, it was primarily used in commercial passenger aircraft with 100+ passengers. An increasing number of aircraft including smaller aircraft types, are getting ADS-B transponders but, until ADS-B becomes mandatory it's up to the aircraft producer and owner to decide if an ADS-B transponder should be installed or not.

Common aircraft models that usually have an ADS-B transponder and are visible on Flightradar24 (within ADS-B coverage):

All Airbus models (A300, A310, A318, A319, A320, A321, A330, A340, A350, A380)
Antonov An-148 and An-158
ATR 72-600 (most new deliveries)
BAe ATP
BAe Avro RJ70, RJ85, RJ100
Boeing 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, 787
Bombardier CRJ-900 (most new deliveries)
Bombardier CS100 and CS300
Embraer E190 (most new deliveries)
Fokker 70 and 100
McDonnell Douglas DC-10 and MD-11
Sukhoi SuperJet 100
Some newer Ilyushin and Tupolev (for example Il-96 and TU-204)


tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Aug 29, 2016 - 06:28pm PT
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/08/65-year-old-woman-takes-out-drone-over-her-virginia-property-with-one-shot/
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 21, 2016 - 03:21pm PT
three words!!

awesome!!

[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 29, 2016 - 10:12am PT
BAN THEM!!! they are too much fun

[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Oct 6, 2016 - 11:18am PT
here's one for ya dingus, dude flying in national park with FAA reg number on his now lost aircraft...go get it and turn him in
http://goldcountry.craigslist.org/laf/5775571980.html
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Oct 24, 2016 - 03:50pm PT
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10-24/sweden-bans-drone-cameras/7959108
Sweden places ban on drone filming without surveillance permit

....The country's Supreme Administrative Court has effectively banned personal drone filming, unless deemed to be for the purpose of "surveillance".

This means unless drone flyers are wishing to document crime or prevent accidents they will most likely be knocked back for the required permit.

However the court held that dashcams, on bicycle or motorbike handlebars, do not require a permit as they are operated by the rider "on the spot".

This is opposed to a drone which is not "controlled locally".

The new ruling does not provide any exemptions for commercial use or journalism.

Unsurprisingly the drone industry is outraged by the decision, with the leading drone body in Sweden, Unmanned Aerial System (UAS), planning to take a stand against the ruling.....
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Oct 24, 2016 - 04:20pm PT
I mean a peeping Tom is pretty harmless, amirite? Lookie but no touchie kinda thing, y'know.....
i-b-goB

Social climber
Wise Acres
Oct 24, 2016 - 04:24pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Oct 24, 2016 - 07:05pm PT
Follow me Drone deal.
rockermike

Trad climber
Berkeley
Dec 12, 2016 - 11:14am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 12, 2016 - 12:01pm PT
rockermike

Trad climber
Berkeley
Dec 13, 2016 - 09:22pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]

ha ha
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Dec 13, 2016 - 09:36pm PT
Indians have been using drones in their fight against DAPL very successfully. No ban.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 16, 2016 - 08:49am PT
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20161208-how-is-is-using-consumer-drones
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Dec 16, 2016 - 10:46am PT
Hamas is using kites for aerial recon:

"The IDF spokesperson released a statement saying 'In the morning [Saturday] a kite was identified with a camera crossing the border from the Gaza Strip. The IDF force that spotted the kite fired into the air from a distance and the kite and its operators fled.'"

"According to the IDF, the kite was used to photograph the area close to the border."

http://m.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Kite-from-Gaza-Strip-hovers-over-Israeli-territory-469692#article=6017QzY2RjVENUEyQjBEMzAxNEJFRjhBRjVCQTgzRjM5QjQ=

Proving once again those people are still stuck in the Nineteenth Century.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 16, 2016 - 10:57am PT
it is almost like they are denied imports building materials like cinder blocks and corrugated tin.

what is your excuse? ;-)
Wayno

Big Wall climber
Seattle, WA
Jan 12, 2017 - 10:08am PT
[quote]http://www.king5.com/news/local/seattle/video-shows-drone-hitting-space-needle/385411168[/quote]

Some recent local news.
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Jan 12, 2017 - 04:11pm PT
Miss Ter E Drones are the devil Bwahhh. Look in the Mirror Claw hammer FA guy.

nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jan 12, 2017 - 04:19pm PT
Jeff, your images are getting better. Do you do any post work? What are you flying right now? That second one - the curve horizon bothers me. Lens correction would probably help.

And yeah, I think the score is 3-zip, Space Needle. Go Space Needle!

[Click to View YouTube Video]

My new one equipped with IR for SAR and inspection use.





BAN THEM!!!
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jan 12, 2017 - 06:39pm PT
You should do more lighthouses.

That's a cool shot of Point Vicente.
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Jan 12, 2017 - 08:19pm PT
Thank's you guys. I work stunts and rigging Drones for me are just a hobby.
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Jan 12, 2017 - 08:22pm PT
Chaz if ya ever wanna fly and climb PM me.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Feb 22, 2017 - 10:07am PT
just finished this up yesterday. It stars Grug, Aya, and Vanya's Van.

[Click to View YouTube Video]


Heading out to do a SAR in the next day or two for a lost dog with my IR equipped Inspire.

How's the banning going?
Don'tKnowHim

Social climber
California
Feb 22, 2017 - 06:26pm PT
If drones were banned, THIS would never have happened... and THAT, my friends, WOULD be a crime!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cnn3ayEuiFI

squishy

Mountain climber
May 8, 2017 - 02:51am PT
Very cool Nature. I started up my sick edits again..
[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
May 11, 2017 - 12:25am PT
I like this one way better
[Click to View YouTube Video]
WBraun

climber
May 21, 2017 - 09:58pm PT
A Washington, D.C. court ruled Friday that the FAA drone registration rule violates the FAA Modernization and Reform Act, which Congress passed in 2012.
Hobbyist John Taylor argued successfully that he should not have to register because the act states that the FAA "may not promulgate any rule or regulation regarding a model aircraft."

The limit for unregistered drones is now 55 pounds.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
May 22, 2017 - 01:06am PT
Really a pretty clean cut case here. Can't thank John enough for his effort, This case might snowball some issues the FAA is having (issues they created). Mostly this case means nothing in and of itself. From my vantage there's a sh#t-storm that's about to erupt. Said sh#t-storm means nothing to the general public.

That said I did some filming yesterday with my un-registered and now not required registered UAS.

http://iplayerhd.com/player/video/16c48fb4-3464-4ca3-a495-d318f714fa5d/share
Dingus McGee

Social climber
Where Safety trumps Leaving No Trace
May 22, 2017 - 04:22am PT
nature,

what brand and kind of lithium batteries do you use for powering your drones?
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
May 30, 2017 - 11:18am PT
So we should be allowed to shoot down any drones under 55lbs??? we were looking for a spot to get cleaned up in the river on sunday. There was a guy in the parking lot flying a drone and filming his GF rideing a bicycle up and down the road. we hiked arround the corner to find a bit of privacy in the river. Took a quick dip and while doing the rubdown with the towel the drone buzzes over to us and hovers about 50ft above us. after about 20sec I gave it the finger and it flew away. Guy was gone when we went back to the car just min later. he absolutly was spying on us and saw me give his camera the finger.....
aspendougy

Trad climber
Los Angeles, CA
May 30, 2017 - 08:22pm PT
Drones are here to stay. A Chinese entrepreneur who lost one friend in a small plane accident and another in a helicopter crash, has vowed to make a passenger drone that will be really safe.

I can see drones being very helpful in locating a missing hiker, for example. Eventually, you can do away with climbing equipment by having a an advanced drone that can hover in the air and belay you. Imagine a device hovering about six feet away from the rock with several feet of slack. And if you yell, "Falling" it goes into a "catch fall" mode. In a few more years, this will be feasible. Even more advanced drones could assist with technical rescues. We'd still need YOSAR for the dicey stuff, but they could be a tool.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
May 31, 2017 - 06:46pm PT


GO CHINA!
China puts into effect new drone registration rules
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-drones-idUSKBN18S3M3
Contractor

Boulder climber
CA
Jun 20, 2017 - 06:22pm PT
Drone racing? I should've seen this coming....

Next- these soft, nocturnal fellows will be the tip of the spear on future battlefields.

In the rear, will be platoons of hackers firing off volleys of anti aircraft malware.

Imagine the the retribution these formerly abused outcasts will reap on protesters during civil unrest.

I'll think twice before I come down on my son for playing video games.

Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 2, 2017 - 03:38pm PT
A man accused of flying a drone over a major Arizona wildfire posted the aerial photos on his website, authorities said Saturday, leading to his arrest for hampering firefighting efforts against the stubborn blaze menacing an area where 19 firefighters were killed four years ago.
The Yavapai County Sheriff's Office said deputies tracked down Gene Alan Carpenter, 54, of Prescott Valley on Friday after spotting a man near a white van flying the drone within hours of the fire being reported last weekend and throughout the week.
Prior contact with Carpenter and photos found on his website showing drone views were used to identify him, authorities said. His drone was seized during his arrest.
The sheriff's office in a press release said Carpenter recklessly endangered 14 aircraft and fire crews in the air and on the ground "with a substantial risk of imminent death or physical injury by flying an unmanned drone aircraft in closed airspace above an active fire area."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/police-suspect-posted-photos-drone-arizona-wildfire-014847624.html
the albatross

Gym climber
Flagstaff
Jul 2, 2017 - 10:00pm PT
Thanks for posting that link Reilly. At that time of the incident, when the drone was spotted by air attack (fixed wing plane coordinating aerial resources) we had to set down three water dropping helicopters. This was at a time in the fire when numerous homes were threatened. We were shut down for about an hour during a fairly critical time on this incident.

It is my understanding this person is facing at least 14 felony charges. I think drones are cool, but please do not fly drones near wildfires. "If you fly, we can't".
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 27, 2017 - 10:43am PT
Wayno

Big Wall climber
Seattle, WA
Jul 27, 2017 - 11:33am PT
Just last week one of my dogs was barking through the screen at the back door. He was bothered by something. Masha took him out back to see and he was looking skyward. Above the house at least a hundred feet was a drone, hovering. I went out there to check it out and noticed it was not that small and had a green and a red light on it. I flipped it the bird and it started to leave and then stopped after thirty feet or so. I waved my hands like "go on, keep moving" and it took off. This was the second time in a week that it was over our house. It didn't really bother me and I thought the incident was humorous and now I'm glad that the dog can sense a drone present.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 7, 2017 - 01:23pm PT
Don't ban 'em, shoot 'em down, braj!

Military can destroy drones over domestic U.S. bases: Pentagon
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-military-drone-idUSKBN1AN2BP
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Aug 14, 2017 - 11:37pm PT
Hopefully the guy isn't spraying the desert with lead in the course of having fun with drones.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 15, 2017 - 08:14am PT
JB, thanks for another edition of "Why Britain Is Emasculated".
Lord Nelson surely rolled over.

But they still put on a jolly good show...


Wait, is that a drone just above the palace on the left?
ß Î Ø T Ç H

Boulder climber
ne'er–do–well
Aug 19, 2017 - 10:07pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
zBrown

Ice climber
Aug 19, 2017 - 10:33pm PT
Fairly standard payload for a drones_worth of heroin flying over the Mexican border is about 13 pounds (2017).

How many are being intercepted? Recent experience suggests a maximum rate of one in six.

Could be much lower.

edit:

YMMV. Calexico shipment. 28 lbs.


Back in the USA (2015)

Drone carrying meth, heroin, hacksaw blades and a cellphone crash lands in Oklahoma prison yard




https://www.musicjinni.com/uitSyWCotGo/Prison-Walls-Are-No-Match-For-Heroin-Drone-Deliveries-Newsy.html
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Sep 25, 2017 - 10:00pm PT
Dubai tests drone taxis:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-emirates-dubai-drones/dubai-starts-tests-in-bid-to-become-first-city-with-flying-taxis-idUSKCN1C0232
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Oct 25, 2017 - 12:48pm PT
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-trump-drones-20171025-story.html

Americans could see a lot more drones flying around their communities as the result of a Trump administration test program to increase government and commercial use of the unmanned aircraft.

President Trump gave the go-ahead Wednesday, signing a directive intended to increase the number and complexity of drone flights.

The presidential memo would allow exemptions from current safety rules so communities could move ahead with testing of drone operations.
...
Safety concerns over drones have risen recently after the collision of a civilian drone and an Army helicopter over Staten Island, N.Y., and the first verified collision in North America between a drone and a commercial aircraft in Quebec City, Canada.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Nov 13, 2017 - 08:05am PT
Brave new world...

[Click to View YouTube Video]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=96&v=9CO6M2HsoIA

Extra...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/12/us/nsa-shadow-brokers.html

More Stuart Russell re autonomous lethal weapons evo...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2064&v=JYQ7p3pWwr4
WyoRockMan

climber
Grizzlyville, WY
Nov 14, 2017 - 06:17pm PT
^^^^^^^
Pretty worrisome.
Bad Climber

Trad climber
The Lawless Border Regions
Nov 15, 2017 - 07:54am PT
Now, THAT's scary.

BAd
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Dec 7, 2017 - 05:25pm PT
One of the winners from the Inaugural Los Angeles Drone Film Festival. More at:
http://www.rotordronemag.com/lon-angeles-drone-film-festival-winners/

[Click to View YouTube Video]
WBraun

climber
Dec 7, 2017 - 05:50pm PT
The "Big Ugly" whew what a monster wave, bad ass!

According to time and circumstance, a drone in the right hands is good.

According to time and circumstance, a drone in the wrong hands is bad.

Life is simple.

Americans make life a complex mess .....
hooblie

climber
from out where the anecdotes roam
Jan 21, 2018 - 07:10am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jan 21, 2018 - 07:59am PT
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/here-rsquo-s-how-drones-do-and-don-rsquo-t-threaten-passenger-aircraft/


“There weren’t any drone collisions until now, and when you consider how many flights there are, I think it confirms my suspicion that there is not this insane risk of planes going down regularly as sometimes the media had us fear would happen,” says Mykel Kochenderfer, an aeronautics engineer and director of the Stanford Intelligent Systems Laboratory at Stanford University. Still, he described the recent U.S. and Canada incidents as “a wake-up call to drone operators” about their potential impact on aviation safety."
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Feb 3, 2018 - 09:15am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Feb 23, 2018 - 11:54pm PT
Drone Killer

https://www.10news.com/news/dropping-dangerous-drones-out-of-the-sky
squishy

Mountain climber
Mar 13, 2018 - 08:49am PT
The drone community totally burned that dude who dived the airplane, threw him under the bus and turned him in...that sh#t was lame...

Not like this stuff..good clean drone fun is where it's at..everyone will be a kook because you old farts put up a fight to a new way to surf the sky.. "That blasted automobile scared my horse! get off my lawn!"
[Click to View YouTube Video]

squishy

Mountain climber
Apr 24, 2018 - 01:35pm PT
Is ship rock off limits to drones?

[Click to View YouTube Video]
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 18, 2018 - 10:59am PT

Kite + camera = DRONE in CA State Parks

At least to a certain law enforcement ranger at Point Cabrillo Light Station State Historic Park it does.

I was KAPing at sunset at Point Cabrillo last week (KAP = kite aerial photography), a place I have KAPed nine times in the past, when at about the end of my session a Park Ranger paid me a visit to advise me that drones are illegal in California State Parks. She was the law enforcement ranger, with a pair of handcuffs and a Glock on her hip, and an AR-15 mounted in the shotgun rack of her truck. She meant business. When she saw me, she activated the flashing blue lights on her truck, which is never a good sign.

No big deal, I thought. I don't own any drones.

But she insisted that any aerial photography is a "drone" to her, and she's The Law in those parts.

I showed her my rig, which she photographed from several angles, including angles which captured both the rig and kite in the same frame, as it hung right in front of her face, while I explained its use and how it's not a drone. She was having none of my explanation. She told me again that drones are outlawed in California State Parks, and that I had to stop what I was doing immediately, or risk being issued a citation.

"Citation for WHAT?" I asked. "Illegal drone", she replied.

"This isn't a drone. I don't have any drones." That went nowhere.

I asked if it's legal to fly a kite in her State Park. She replied in the affirmative. I asked if it's OK to take photos in her State Park. That too is legal, she said.

"Then how come I can't do two legal things at the same time, without the police telling me to stop?" I asked. Because "drones are illegal" was her response.

I asked if she had a copy of the text of the law she was trying to enforce with her. She answered by asking me if I was a lawyer. That's another bad sign. I think the police ask if you're a lawyer when they realize that the tool they brought with them isn't the right one for the job they want to do.

(I've been asked by the police if I was a lawyer so many times in the past that my standard answer is "Are you?" We then establish that neither of us are lawyers, and we get back to discussing whatever it was we were talking about before the cop changed the subject.)

I didn't give her the standard answer, because I was still trying to be nice, even though my frustration level was climbing. I replied that I was interested to read the law because I wanted to be in 100% compliance with all rules and regulations at all times. If something's illegal, I don't want to do it. She took my phone number, and promised me she would look up the law, and get back to me on how the law prohibited KAP. She never called. I never expected her to call.

I was flying almost 700 feet away from the scenic and historic Point Cabrillo Lighthouse, and over a hundred yards downwind from any other building or public access road, so this wasn't one of those times when my camera was within a few yards of a lighthouse. Didn't matter to her. She's highly trained, and she knows a drone when she sees one. And she saw one suspended from my kite line!

As she left, she told me "I won't be citing you right now", but that I needed to quit immediately. I was finished anyway, whether she was there to congratulate me on another successful KAP outing or there to take me to jail. I told her so much, and also told her I intended to start up again the next morning at first light.

Later that evening, as I was attempting to get shots of the lighthouse using a normal tripod, the lighthouse docent - Laura - paid me a visit. As we were talking, she mentioned how she had to call the Ranger to deal with "some yahoo flying a kite" earlier. That yahoo was me (I've been called worse) I said.

Turns out, a visitor had seen me KAPing, and had also seen at least one of the dozens of "NO DRONE ZONE" signs plastered all over everything at Point Cabrillo, and told Laura about a drone flying. Laura took a look out the front door of the lighthouse, and because she had no idea of KAP, and kite string is a tough thing to spot from 200m in fading light, she assumed "drone" and called in the cops.

That was my fault, for failure to communicate ahead of time.

The next morning - I was staying overnight at one of the rental units on the lighthouse grounds - Steve, the HMFIC of Point Cabrillo Lighthouse paid me a visit to tell me that everything I was doing was OK. I wasn't out of line at all. Steve and I had met several times over the years, and he was hip to what we do. Steve even knows Cris B. (ringleader of CA KAP, and retired professor of architecture at Cal Berkeley) so KAP is nothing new to him. "For crying out loud, we SELL kites at the gift shop inside the lighthouse" he said.

Before I took off the following morning, I left both Steve and Laura a couple sacks of California avocados, to kind of let them know I'm not sore with either one of them. And I also left them a few of my cards, with a link to my Flickr page. Lighthouse Laura follows me on Flickr now!

Lesson learned? Communication is key. BEFORE I launched a kite, I should have said something to the docent at the lighthouse about what I was doing. I should never assume just because I've been KAPing somewhere for a decade that anybody else there knows what I'm up to.

The Ranger? She's a lost cause. If she didn't grasp the concept when illustrated for her, she never will. She wrote in her report that she observed a "drone tied to a kite". If she wants avocados, she has to buy them herself. I've been contacted by all kinds of police / security types while KAPing - local cops, county sheriffs, State Police, Highway Patrol, port security, rangers, Border Patrol, etc - at least a dozen times in the past. And every one of them gave me the green light once they saw what I was doing. This one was different.

My biggest regret is that I wasn't snapping pics of her while she was photographing my rig. Next time, I'll try to remember.

That's OK. I got the shot I really wanted:

nafod

Boulder climber
State college
Jun 18, 2018 - 11:56am PT
More than a few drone operators think that by tethering it, they can pretend it is a kite and can skip the FAA drone rules. Not.
perswig

climber
Jun 18, 2018 - 01:19pm PT
If she wants avocados, she has to buy them herself.

Damn skippy.

The UAV uber-pervs have probably queered the pitch for you kite guys re: the general populace, as now we/they are sensitized to worst-case scenario stalking and could hold each user group in similar suspicion. Might explain the cop's response?

Dale
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 18, 2018 - 01:43pm PT
The FAA rules the skies. They have a different opinion.

If California wants to ban kites in State Parks, they can do that. But with exception of sensitive wildlife habitats, they have yet to make that move.

Thanks, Mr Milktoast. It helps that we're a small community. I know practically everyone who does this, and I can't burn my own bridges without screwing people I know and admire - people who I've met and shared meals with.
chip_brazuca

Social climber
Mato Grosso
Jun 18, 2018 - 02:03pm PT
Drones são uma besteira
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Jun 18, 2018 - 06:07pm PT
Chaz, Chaz, Chaz, the only thing you say to a cop is "No, Ma'am", or "Yes, Ma'am.".
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 18, 2018 - 06:17pm PT
My Lawyer tells me to not even say that.

But you got make a decision sometimes. Do you want to be like Jesus? Or do you want to be like a lawyer? Because you can't do both at once.
ß Î Ø T Ç H

Boulder climber
ne'er–do–well
Jun 18, 2018 - 08:33pm PT
More than a few drone operators think that by tethering it, they can pretend it is a kite and can skip the FAA drone rules.
Is that so.
nafod

Boulder climber
State college
Jun 19, 2018 - 05:48am PT
Is that so.
Not sure if they are thinking 'kite' specifically, but I run a drone program and we have sites that would require waivers to fly at. Constantly get folks saying, "Hey, if I attach it to a tether..."

You can put up a big netted enclosure and zorch around in that, as it becomes indoor flying with no FAA restrictions. The tether idea makes sense since it'd have the same effect of keeping the drone from running off willy-nilly, but the FAA says no.
Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Jun 19, 2018 - 11:36am PT
Weaponized kites. we are watching you Chaz

http://www.wthitv.com/content/national/485891321.html
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 19, 2018 - 06:11pm PT
The French had them beat, by at least 100 years.

[Click to View YouTube Video]

neebee

Social climber
calif/texas
Jun 19, 2018 - 06:20pm PT
hey there, say, chaz... oh my... :O


say, ;) is there anywhere, or, anyone that can make a 'legal'
ruling on what you ARE actually flying, and thus,

letting you have a 'proof' of 'whatever' paper, to show the
police or rangers, :O


just that-- ohmy, i love your kite photos, and, don't want
anyone 'messing' with you, :(


love them avocados, :)
say, odd side-note...


avocado...
almost sounds like:

abogado...
EdBannister

Mountain climber
13,000 feet
Jun 19, 2018 - 07:26pm PT
waiting for the first fire fighting drones...
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 17, 2018 - 02:48pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Jul 17, 2018 - 02:50pm PT
waiting for the first fire fighting drones...

Federal firefighters in California have been testing and using drones to spot smoke for years. there's been firefighting drones out working for a long time now...problem is that the public is still hung up on them so it's not widely known..fear is a hella of drug..
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jul 22, 2018 - 09:59am PT
But a primary amateur purpose is for peeping.

take your meds


https://triblive.com/usworld/world/13888281-74/missing-british-climber-found-alive-by-drone-in-himalayas
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Jul 22, 2018 - 10:04am PT
Grass fires: another reason to ban drones.
ß Î Ø T Ç H

Boulder climber
ne'er–do–well
Aug 18, 2018 - 09:16pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
squishy

Mountain climber
Sep 16, 2018 - 10:37pm PT
I got a chance to fly today, here's a raw look at what your missing...

[Click to View YouTube Video]
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Sep 17, 2018 - 08:00am PT
XCon, yer hilarious - nothing like a nicely rigged ‘landslide’, eh? And stoking conspiracy and xenophobia fears is straight outta Dick-tater 101.
dirtbag

climber
Sep 17, 2018 - 08:46am PT
And stoking conspiracy and xenophobia fears is straight outta Dick-tater 101.


Exhibit A:


Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Dec 21, 2018 - 07:26am PT


Flights resumed at London's Gatwick Airport on Friday after drones sparked about 36 hours of travel chaos including the shutdown of the airfield, leaving tens of thousands of passengers stranded or delayed during the busy holiday season.

The airport said in a statement that Gatwick's runway is "now available and aircraft are arriving and departing.”

"We are, however, expecting knock-on delays and cancellations to flights," it said. "If you are due to travel from Gatwick today, we strongly recommend that you check the status of your flight with your airline before departing for the airport."

...The prospect of a deadly collision between what police described as industrial-grade drones and an airliner led authorities to stop all flights in and out of Gatwick, Britain's second-busiest airport by passenger numbers, on Thursday. The drones were first spotted Wednesday evening.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 21, 2018 - 11:52am PT
So now, the first attack on a airport. And those in the know, who must know who did this, are keeping mum. So now they are conspirators in the attack.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 21, 2018 - 11:52am PT
The practical Dutch have the anti-drone thang sussed...

squishy

Mountain climber
Dec 21, 2018 - 01:13pm PT
You wanna know who can operate drones for days over an airport without getting caught or stopped by the authorities? Yeah, me too...I suspect a false flag orchestrated by the movers and shakers of the drone industry or a state sponsored method of sowing divide through chaos. I heard such methods were popular these days, cough cough Russia.

How is everyone enjoying your FPV demonetization today? Good times, right? My guys could take down all those drones within the time it takes to charge a lipo.

This incident is very revealing and the first thing we have learned is that the police and regulators are incompetent and unable to combat even basic drone threats, so what are those regulations going to do when they are powerless to enforce them? What an embarrassment...
squishy

Mountain climber
Dec 23, 2018 - 12:27pm PT
This is the stuff right here that we have been dealing with for years. This is why experts doubt every drone story that comes out, because they have all proven to be bullshit in the end.

"There might never have been drone activity over Gatwick Airport, the police have said.

Flights were suspended for more than 36 hours when a device was reported to have been seen close to the runway on Wednesday night.

But Sussex Police are keeping an open mind in the investigation and said there might 'not have been any genuine drone activity in the first place'."

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/gatwick-drone-police-say-there-13772183?fbclid=IwAR3hn9PR4t-YrFIX4MIgEy58VZDBH2MyrDBDpMVJzZNvVFCYydcaTzPhUxE#ICID=ios_TMNewsApp_AppShare_Click_Other
couchmaster

climber
Dec 24, 2018 - 10:16am PT


Engadget (+Wirecutter) has a descent article on the best drones for photography. https://www.engadget.com/2018/12/24/the-best-drones-for-photos-and-video/

#1 DJI Mavic 2 Pro.


Fly safely my brobhams



squishy

Mountain climber
Dec 25, 2018 - 02:17pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Messages 1 - 590 of total 590 in this topic
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta