Charleston, South Carolina

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 490 of total 490 in this topic
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Original Post - Jun 18, 2015 - 06:25pm PT
I felt that someone should start a thread about this - yet another murderous rampage with innocents as the targets. He got the gun for his birthday.

We certainly aren't in danger of running out of horrible people up here, but I am sincerely incapable of understanding why there isn't a ongoing and massive national dialogue going on among people of good will about this cancerous love affair so many citizens of the U.S. have with firearms.

There's much I want to say, but it would be probably more useful to read the comments of others for a while.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 18, 2015 - 07:05pm PT
Suprema: Just broke my resolution, but all I've read &/or heard so far - maybe, maybe not.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jun 18, 2015 - 07:25pm PT
He admitted to friends that he belonged to racist groups. There are pictures on his Facebook page wearing a partied S Africa and Rhodesia flags on his coat, and with a confederate battle flag.

Pill popper.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/06/18/everything-known-about-charleston-church-shooting-suspect-dylann-roof.html


Aside from the photo, there isn't much on the public portion of Roof’s Facebook page. His apparent MySpace page is even more cryptic, featuring just a photo of a dog and a Sunkist can and the following song from the Christian metal band A Thousand Times Repent.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/06/18/alleged_charleston_shooter_dylann_roof_was_wearing_an_apartheid_flag_in.html
Family is Christian, so the Islamic terrorism angle isn't there.
Todd Eastman

climber
Bellingham, WA
Jun 18, 2015 - 07:33pm PT
Family is Christian, so the Islamic terrorist angle isn't there.

Christian terrorist angle in full play...
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Jun 18, 2015 - 07:35pm PT
Christian racist
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Jun 18, 2015 - 07:36pm PT
The fact that he was a Christian makes him no less capable of doing this than anyone else on the planet.....the fact that he was a loser and a racist with easy access to a weapon tells the tale.

This countries weird obsession with firearms has led to far too many senseless deaths and is an embarrassment to all who live here.
Todd Eastman

climber
Bellingham, WA
Jun 18, 2015 - 07:41pm PT
Islamic terrorist

Black thug

Christian racist

Is that how the labeling goes?
Charlie D.

Trad climber
Western Slope, Tahoe Sierra
Jun 18, 2015 - 07:45pm PT
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jun 18, 2015 - 07:46pm PT
@ TE: Open to your universal labeling system.

The Islamic terrorist card has already been played by Presidential candidate Lindsey Graham

Lindsey Graham downplays race after black church shooting: People ‘looking for Christians to kill them’
Clint Cummins

Trad climber
SF Bay area, CA
Jun 18, 2015 - 07:59pm PT
It looked to me like the target was somewhat random -
he had mentioned other targets recently to his friends, and they were not sure if he was joking.
I imagine his father (not uncle), who gave him the gun just recently, does not feel good about that gift.
"Give the gift of death."
It could be classified as transfering (or providing access to) a firearm to someone who is not responsible.
(That might work for legislation?)
At a minimum it should be possible to sue the father,
which might get other such people thinking about giving such a gift?

In my view, there will always be people who don't have reasonable values,
and want to kill other people.
Particularly adolescent males who have a tendency to go extreme
(that's why there are drinking age limits, etc.)
Being mentally ill doesn't help either....
We might prevent some deaths if we could keep guns out their hands of some of these people.
Basic ways to do this:
 require license (with criminal record check, mental capacity test) to buy or receive a gun
 tax guns (make them more expensive)
These methods won't prevent all shootings, but they might help.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Jun 18, 2015 - 08:03pm PT
Who knows if the uncle actually regrets the gift? He was 21 years old, where did he get his racisim? I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was a family affair.
Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Jun 18, 2015 - 08:05pm PT
And the confederate flag is still proudly flown in S. Carolina.

Interesting that today the Supreme Court just ruled that Texas could refuse a request to make a specialty license plate with the confederate flag on it. Maybe SC can become as enlightened as Texas, not a high bar.
Charlie D.

Trad climber
Western Slope, Tahoe Sierra
Jun 18, 2015 - 08:10pm PT
where did he get his racisim? I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was a family affair.

Amen that capacity for hatred is inherited.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 18, 2015 - 08:32pm PT
His sister was the one that recognized him from the surveillance video and dropped a dime on him, so don't paint the whole clan with the same brush.

He had a felony drug possession arrest in February. He was already legally bared from possessing or having a firearm transferred to him.

Daddy is probably going to prison for ten years.
I'll bet that's where he got the attitude from as well.

He deserves worse.
crankster

Trad climber
Jun 18, 2015 - 08:34pm PT
A national disgrace.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 18, 2015 - 08:43pm PT
Maybe SC can become as enlightened as Texas, not a high bar.

SC has,

an Indian American woman for Governor,

A Black Senator

And a special needs gay Senator.

One of the victims was a well respected, black, long time state legislator.

how much more "enlightened" can you get?

FRUMY

Trad climber
Bishop,CA
Jun 18, 2015 - 08:48pm PT
How much more --- drop the flag of Traitors.
We don't have a gun problem -- that laughable.
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Jun 18, 2015 - 08:48pm PT
A national disgrace.

No, Crankster, not a "national" disgrace. A human disgrace.

Yes, the US has a gun culture that makes it easier, but racial/religious/whatever hatred is universal.

There is no country in the world that doesn't have psychopaths within its population. Perhaps some are worse than others, but in many ways, the US is a model of racial acceptance. (And yes, I know that white cops kill black boys).
thebravecowboy

climber
liberated libertine
Jun 18, 2015 - 08:52pm PT
how much more "enlightened" can you get?

are we both speaking of South Carolina, USA?
Clint Cummins

Trad climber
SF Bay area, CA
Jun 18, 2015 - 08:54pm PT
Our society glorifies violence in so many ways. These kids today are being raised on a constant dose from TV, movies, and those video games that are absolutely appalling.
Violent art/simulations (movies, video games) may actually reduce violence because they allow normal people to "try it", knowing it's not real.
However, they may encourage violent fantasies of non-normal people.

Overall, it's hard to censor art (age limits/guides probably help, though), and it can be a positive thing on balance.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Jun 18, 2015 - 08:58pm PT
Cragman, face it , we have a gun problem.
Every country has societal problems. Many of our societal problems are exacerbated by our gun culture. Our gun culture, in all of its vulgarity, stands alone among first world nations....we should be ashamed.

Clint Cummins

Trad climber
SF Bay area, CA
Jun 18, 2015 - 09:06pm PT
Yes, Dean, it's the combination of irresponsible people and guns.
How do we try to reduce this combination?
We can't legislate morality (or family values) or solve many mental health issues, but licensing of guns is an available tool.

The difficulty is to manage the positives and negatives of licensing.
Even with a good licensing system, some people will get around it, like in this tragedy.
It's still worth working on, though - may be possible to improve it.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Jun 18, 2015 - 09:06pm PT
Cragman, you're a standup guy....I guess that we will just have to agree to disagree.

crankster

Trad climber
Jun 18, 2015 - 09:14pm PT
This is a problem with no simple answer. No gun problem?

Clint Cummins

Trad climber
SF Bay area, CA
Jun 18, 2015 - 09:16pm PT
Hmm, I wonder what the graph looks like with Mexico included?
:-)
And what is going on in Chile?

Thanks for explaining, thebravecowboy.
thebravecowboy

climber
liberated libertine
Jun 18, 2015 - 09:19pm PT
per Wiki, it's about 3x that of the U.S., Clint. And it has nothing to do with American firearm supply chains, nor that Anglo coca habit.

Venezuela, Guatemala, and Swaziland come in at 10x the U.S. rate, while Honduras clocks in at ~20x the U.S. homicide by firearm rate.
10b4me

Social climber
Jun 18, 2015 - 09:56pm PT

when a 2nd Amendment fanatic has his son or daughter killed like this, then rest assured they will re-think gun control

I disagree. This is when the eye for an eye attitude becomes all consuming.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 18, 2015 - 10:55pm PT
According to he American Bar Association (.org) web site, firearm deaths in the United States are 8 times higher than its economic counterparts in the world.

Check it out for yourself - there's some more equally dismal pieces of information related to this topic.

I'd like to think that the ABA is pretty careful about the accuracy of the facts that they post.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jun 18, 2015 - 11:13pm PT
That's not a fair comparison. We are way better than that.

We're about 177 times more lethal that Japan or South Korea, for example, or 43 times more lethal than the UK.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate
Clint Cummins

Trad climber
SF Bay area, CA
Jun 19, 2015 - 02:53am PT
OK, that table at least explains what's going on with Switzerland (it's suicides, not homicides).
steveA

Trad climber
Wolfeboro, NH
Jun 19, 2015 - 04:52am PT
Jun 18, 2015 - 08:48pm PT
"We don't have a gun problem...we have a society problem.

Our society glorifies violence in so many ways. These kids today are being raised on a constant dose from TV, movies, and those video games that are absolutely appalling.

Factor in the biggest culprit....parents who allow their children to take all of that junk in.....and deaden their senses to just how abhorrent violence is.

This father gave his son a handgun for his 21st birthday, knowing full well that the kid had a serious hate problem. Gee....I wonder where that came from???? "

I couldn't agree more Cragman.

I just came back from the UK, which according to the chart, has one of the lowest rates of gun violence per capita.

This violence certainly is a national disgrace.

Many of our youth are addicted to violent video games, which also reflects,
in my opinion, a very bad trend. I'm at a loss to find a simple solution; except good parenting.
bookworm

Social climber
Falls Church, VA
Jun 19, 2015 - 05:31am PT
http://homicidewatch.org/

http://chamspage.blogspot.com/2014/12/2015-baltimore-city-homicidesmurders.html

http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/2015-chicago-murders


What do these murders have in common?

1. the vast majority are black people killing black people

2. the gun murders were committed with guns obtained illegally

3. these cities have the toughest gun laws in the country

4. these cities/states have been RULED (not governed) by democrats for decades

5. the media and libs are silent
crankster

Trad climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 06:24am PT
We have a gun and societal problem, imo; a lethal combination. It's a myth that owning a gun makes you more safe.
It looks like the kid bought the gun used in the massacre himself with birthday cash.
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jun 19, 2015 - 06:53am PT
That's because the arms merchants have built and sold millions upon millions of weapons to civilians. This isn't some kind of natural disaster. This situation where 'criminals can get a gun if they want' IS A DIRECT RSULT of the proliferation of firearms in our society. 1+1=2.

Spot on.
Charlie D.

Trad climber
Western Slope, Tahoe Sierra
Jun 19, 2015 - 06:53am PT
We don't have a gun problem...we have a society problem.

Dean can you possibly imagine that just perhaps, just maybe we have both? Is it really that much of a stretch to link them?
Charlie D.

Trad climber
Western Slope, Tahoe Sierra
Jun 19, 2015 - 07:12am PT
Clam shells were not specifically designed for killing people Dean.
bookworm

Social climber
Falls Church, VA
Jun 19, 2015 - 07:15am PT
Armstrong Williams' cousin was the pastor killed in the shooting:

http://www.wjla.com/articles/2015/06/newstalk-armstrong-williams-talks-about-his-cousin-who-was-killed-in-charleston-shooting-114849.html

Charlie D.

Trad climber
Western Slope, Tahoe Sierra
Jun 19, 2015 - 07:34am PT
Dean I may be missing your point about clam shells but you are missing mine....

Here is the link to the company who manufactured the weapon used in the Sandy Brooke ES killings: http://www.bushmaster.com/

The marketing of their products has changed since SB with the whole military hero sniper imagines. Previously they had skulls all over their web site. My point is that these problems are linked and clearly the marketing of these weapons demonstrates just how strong that link is with all the macho bravado references.

I have no doubt you are a responsible citizen and gun owner. I think of myself the same as a citizen and gun owner. The problem we have is there are many in our society who are sick and or dysfunctional. Creating a system for easy access and fanned by a culture of violence is a bad combination. We have both problems.

Norton

Social climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 07:52am PT
And the confederate flag is still proudly flown in S. Carolina.


yes, and they name streets after Confederate Generals..

who bravely fought to keep black people as slaves

when you have a living culture in the American South that encourages racism ...............
jstan

climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 08:59am PT
yes, and they name streets after Confederate Generals..

A couple of observations

1. People who have been pissed off, never forget.

2. Now, shall we discuss Iraq?
Norton

Social climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 09:43am PT
I did not know he was prohibited from owning firearms....

for what reason?

got a source I can read where you got this from?
Barbarian

climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 09:53am PT
My only offering to this thread is as follows:

My thoughts, and prayers go out to the families and friends of those who were murdered. My heartfelt wish is that each of you is able to find the peace to overcome this tragic impact to your life.

The rest of you can back to arguing now.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 19, 2015 - 10:02am PT
My thoughts, and prayers go out to the families and friends of those who were murdered.

Thanks Barbarian. My thoughts, too.
Ward Trotter

Trad climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 10:08am PT
Once again we have a mass murderer on Psych Meds.
And once again we also have political forces trying to exploit and take advantage of tragedy to get their licks in.

My condolences to the families of the victims.
Rockies Obscure

Trad climber
rockiesobscure.com....Canada
Jun 19, 2015 - 10:58am PT
Speaking of guns, off topic.

I recently visited Wagon Wheel boulders in California.

What is the obsession with shooting at glass bottles on BLM land, that everyone says they care so much about. As if.

Place looks like a dump.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:01am PT
Gun laws are definitely screwed up in this country. There should be more regulations as to who can own a gun. The kid was obviously a withdrawn and angry individual yet he got a gun for his birthday? Without the access to the gun he would most likely just jump off a bridge which would do the society a favor.

Our gun laws are imperfect, since in a perfect world, no one would need a firearm. In a broken world, no one with a dangerous mental illness would have access to a firearm. In our real world, neither happens.

The anti-gun propaganda trotted out whenever we have this sort of evil incident intentionally overlooks some key facts:

For example, gun violence per capita has been decreasing in the United States:


People like to say we have the highest rate of gun violence for developed countries (whatever "developed" means), but, again, the statistics they trot out don't account for population. Of course the United States has more gun violence than, say, Finland. We have more people, too. When adjusted for population, the statistics tell a much difference story. The following table includes only countries in the OECD so they are, presumably, "developed:"


The perpetrator committed an evil act. If we had better gun control, what would have prevented him from simply burning the church down or blowing it up?

I don't own a firearm, and never have, so I don't think I qualify as a "gun nut." I simply get tired of people trying to exploit evil acts for agendas that don't really fit. It reminds me of the Kennedy assassination, when the haters blamed Dallas when they should have blamed a madman.

Then there is the "Christian" angle. Is this terrorism caused by Christians, directed at them Christians, or something else?

I guess I'm just tired of all the half-baked political analysis while the bodies are still warm. Instead of mourning the tragedy, we simply misuse it to attack those with whom we disagree. For shame!

John



johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:04am PT
To say that this guy or any of the other ones will find a way to get a gun, even with more rigid gun laws, is nothing more than a unsubstantiated statement. I'm not buying the, they grew up watching violence, either.

We have a percentage of youth and grownups that kill. Their choice of weapons that enable them to kill the most amd fastest is a gun.

To be clear, this was race motivated. He drove by hundreds of churches on his way there knowing where he was going and who would be inside there.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:08am PT
what would have prevented him from simply burning the church down or blowing it up?

His stupidity.
crankster

Trad climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:13am PT

Jun 19, 2015 - 09:53am PT
My only offering to this thread is as follows:

My thoughts, and prayers go out to the families and friends of those who were murdered. My heartfelt wish is that each of you is able to find the peace to overcome this tragic impact to your life.

The rest of you can back to arguing now.

This is the problem...people who never want to debate or argue the issue of racism and/or gun violence. Just go about your day...until it happens again.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:14am PT
This is the problem...people who never want to debate or argue the issue of racism and/or gun violence. Just go about your day...until it happens again.

Racism is evil. Gun violence is deplorable. The Second Amendment is the law. Irrational people sometimes do horrible things.

Carry on.

John
Norton

Social climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:22am PT
Does the quite easy access to firearms in America have anything to do with firearm related
deaths, JohnE?

Do you think there is any relationship between, say, a state like Massachusetts having the most restrictive gun laws and also the least gun deaths versus a state like Alaska having
the least restrictive gun laws and most gun deaths, give or take those state's current respective rankings?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:25am PT
Of course it does, Norton, but that horse left the barn centuries ago. How do you propose to change the easy access to firearms now, with 88 privately-owned firearms per 100 people, in a way that doesn't leave those who shouldn't have firearms having possession of the greatest number of firearms?

Also, when it comes to "mass killings," do you think that the number of non-firearm related homicides would increase if firearms were more difficult to obtain, Norton?

John
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:31am PT
He was already prohibited. He got a gun anyway

You missed where I said, with more rigid gun laws.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:38am PT
This countries weird obsession with firearms has led to far too many senseless deaths and is an embarrassment to all who live here.

It's not an embarrassment to me nor to anybody I know. It's not an "obsession," nor is it "weird." So, wrong on all counts.

And please enlighten us about which proposed anti-gun laws would have prevented this tragedy.
10b4me

Social climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:40am PT
What is the obsession with shooting at glass bottles on BLM land

because they can

that everyone says they care so much about.

"everyone" is a relative term.
Barbarian

climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:40am PT
This is the problem...people who never want to debate or argue the issue of racism and/or gun violence. Just go about your day...until it happens again.

Crankster - you misunderstood. I did not say that I was unwilling to debate or argue those issues. I am more than willing to do so as they are issues that need to be discussed. I simply prefer to have those discussions in a forum where that discussion has value. In other words....not here.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:49am PT
I own several fire arms and would not be happy to loose my right to them. To many times it only takes the acts of a few to screw it up for the rest of us. This is where we are probably headed. If we refuse to except a few small changes and to self regulate ourselves better then get ready for more intrusive laws that neither of us want.
Rockies Obscure

Trad climber
rockiesobscure.com....Canada
Jun 19, 2015 - 12:01pm PT
because they can

10b4me,

Yes they can of course so can BLM should shut down areas when they get trashed? You guys would know better than me, I was just visiting, but New Jack was 'cared for' also a bit, but Wagon Wheel was likely the most dumpy area I have been to in California, speaking of broken glass everywhere.

To me it makes any rules posted by BLM laughable.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 19, 2015 - 12:07pm PT
A new law needs to hit the books...

One that says something along the lines of...

You can't give a gun to a fuked up, bigot, NUTCASE...

Unenforceable in principle. Sorry.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 19, 2015 - 12:13pm PT
If we refuse to except a few small changes and to self regulate ourselves better then get ready for more intrusive laws that neither of us want.

"They" can make all the laws "they" want to. Such laws (including the existence or non-existence of the second amendment) have no effect upon the reality of inalienable rights. No other country in the world was designed upon the realization and intention to uphold and protect inalienable rights.

All other countries have constitutions that presume that governments grant rights, and thus that governments can take them away. Our government was designed in unique fashion, whereby the definition of tyranny was built in: ANY government that fails to uphold and protect inalienable rights is tyrannical, regardless of how "benevolent" it might appear to any particular subset of the governed.

So, yes, a tiny few cause we the people a great deal of anguish and distress. But that fact is irrelevant to inalienable rights which any legitimate government must uphold and protect. So, let "them" pass or undo any law or amendment they choose. When they dink around with the right of self-defense (which logically presumes the right to the means of it), "they" only invalidate their own actions and show "themselves" to be tyrannical and worthy of overthrow.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 12:35pm PT
yes yes

fact: "laws" do not stop people from not stopping at stop signs, failing to seat belt their
four year old, fail to stop anyone from buying a firearm and killing with it

therefore:......wait for it....

"that is simply the price we pay for living in a free and open society"

conclusion: there are no solutions, solutions require more laws, laws don't work

bottom line: The Slippery Slope - it all about me! any talk about "solutions" to senseless
firearm murder could, maybe, result in the Feds coming to take my guns away

so forget that sh!t, instead keep quietly insisting that is the price we pay to live "free"
Spiny Norman

Social climber
Boring, Oregon
Jun 19, 2015 - 12:39pm PT
The kid was not insane.

This was a calculated act of political terrorism, aimed squarely at African-American citizens in the American south.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:05pm PT
They can make all kinds of laws that wont interfere with our inalienable rights.

But, it'd be useless since some wont follow them, much like drunk driving. The only way to get a bad drunk driver off the road is with a good drunk driver, millions of them.
Spiny Norman

Social climber
Boring, Oregon
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:06pm PT
Look at the history of racial violence in this country. It was often sanctioned by the pillars of their local communities. In many cases these men were active participants in the violence.

The "lone nut" theory does nothing to explain the fact of consistent racial terror targeted mainly against African-Americans in the United States.

http://withoutsanctuary.org

There are clear historical reasons that the Stars and Bars is still flying at the top of its pole on the South Carolina State House.

Even if this specific shooter was a bit (or a lot) disturbed, he was unambiguously acting within a long social and political tradition. That grim fact cannot be dismissed, cannot be waved away.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:13pm PT
Super big time regulation...

Wouldn't solve everything...

Nothing does...

But most likely would save some lives...


exactly

and that could be done without "taking my guns away"

but won't happen because "they might take my guns away"
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:15pm PT
Norton, what is your solution? Since U. S. gun violence per capita has been on a fairly decline for the last several decades, what do you think is bringing that about? I rather suspect part of the reason is simple demographics. As our society aged with the Baby Boomers, violence per capita decreased, but I hope we did something else that we can emulate and expand.

Spiny Norman and Locker, "insane" can have rather imprecise meanings. In the legal sense, an "insane" person has no blame for his or her actions because he or she doesn't know right from wrong. I have no doubt that Roof was not insane under that criterion. He carefully planned his actions, and cultivated an attitude that caused him to carry out his murders.

I would hope, though, that normal people do not think it their mission to murder other humans because the vitims differ from the perpetrator. Those capable of functioning constructively in society possess enough self-restrain to avoid committing violence except in the most extraordinary circumstances of grave danger. In that sense, his mentality was at least abnormal (no 'Young Frankenstein" jokes, please).


If we know someone lacks that necessary self-restraint, I would find anyone giving that person possession of a firearm engaging in criminal behavior. That does not violate any Second Amendment jurisprudence of which I am aware.

One other thought: Many people have expressed a belief that strong gun controls in urban areas have not reduced gun violence. I'm wondering if Crimpie (if she still reads ST) or any other with knowledge is aware of any studies that differentiate gun violence per capita between areas with strong vs. permissive gun ownership controls in the U.S., or that compare before-and-after statistics in areas that enact more stingent controls. Comparing U.S. gun deaths, where gun ownership is so prevalent, with those in, say, Australia, where gun ownership is rare, strikes me as a non-useful comparison, but comparing across jurisdictions in the U.S., all of which are subject to the Second Amendment, might give some useful results.

John
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:20pm PT
The quickest way to stop an evil man with a gun, is a good one with one.

[Click to View YouTube Video]

Growing up my dad was always the armed deacon or usher.
Spiny Norman

Social climber
Boring, Oregon
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:22pm PT
Violent crime is decreasing across the industrialized world, not just in the US.

No one knows why.

One possible explanation, seemingly as plausible as any other, is that this decrease in violence is due to the removal of lead from gasoline.

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-27067615
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:22pm PT
U. S. gun violence per capita has been on a fairly decline for the last several decades

John, has the number of mass murders gone up or down? Do those statistics differentiate?

I really don't know, just asking.
Spiny Norman

Social climber
Boring, Oregon
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:25pm PT
"The quickest way to stop an evil man with a gun, is a good one with one."

In some places it is vastly easier for an evil man to get a gun than in other places.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:27pm PT
Johnboy, the number has generally been steady. See below.


It's more fashionable to report on them now.

One other observation. Two of the biggest mass murders - the Oklahoma City bombing and the 9/11 attacks, are not included because they did not involve mass shootings.

John
ontheedgeandscaredtodeath

Social climber
SLO, Ca
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:30pm PT
I knew the "if everyone was armed someone could have shot the shooter" argument would be out within hours. But even if that is true why do we tolerate a society where people feel the need to carry a gun to church or school to protect themselves? The Wild West wasn't even that lawless and certainly no other developed nation is now.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:31pm PT
These nut cases always pick a presumed "gun free zone" to attack, never one where they are likely to encounter an armed defender.


Why is that?


This guy's arrest record comes from a probable attempt to case a shopping mall in February.

Maybe he discovered that location wasn't as "gun free" as he presumed.

Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:31pm PT
In his remarks the next day President Obama pushed gun control and reminded us all of America's "dark past."

I would have thought it better to say something like "Let's all go to a church on Sunday. All of us regardless of our heritage or religious beliefs. Better yet go to an A.M.E. Church. Pack the churches. We need a national display of support for the grieving families, friends and church members of these young people so callously massacred."

If he is really serious about guns he should have waited at least until the dead were buried, then put a bill up to debate.

He could have pointed out that although this act was motivated by a dark, evil racism, our nation needs to look forward, to continue along the path we have followed since Lincoln and before. There have been fits and starts and a civil war which took more than half a million lives, but we are better off now than before.

If you don't agree we’ve improved ourselves as a nation talk to my stepdad. He was a freedom rider and did hard time in Parchman State Penn in Mississippi for his chosen act of civil disobedience, using a colored bathroom at the Trailways Bus Station. He'll fill you in on the ignorance of the north and the brutal white supremacy of the deep south in the 1950s.


crankster

Trad climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 01:56pm PT
next day President Obama pushed gun control and reminded us all of America's "dark past."
This is all the blather on Fox & talk radio.

How many times has the President had to address a community after a mass shooting? 9? 10?
He also said this:

Any death of this sort is a tragedy. Any shooting involving multiple victims is a tragedy. There is something particularly heartbreaking about the death happening in a place in which we seek solace and we seek peace, in a place of worship.

Mother Emanuel is, in fact, more than a church. This is a place of worship that was founded by African Americans seeking liberty. This is a church that was burned to the ground because its worshipers worked to end slavery. When there were laws banning all-black church gatherings, they conducted services in secret. When there was a nonviolent movement to bring our country closer in line with our highest ideals, some of our brightest leaders spoke and led marches from this church’s steps. This is a sacred place in the history of Charleston and in the history of America...

Until the investigation is complete, I’m necessarily constrained in terms of talking about the details of the case. But I don’t need to be constrained about the emotions that tragedies like this raise. I’ve had to make statements like this too many times. Communities like this have had to endure tragedies like this too many times. We don’t have all the facts, but we do know that, once again, innocent people were killed in part because someone who wanted to inflict harm had no trouble getting their hands on a gun. Now is the time for mourning and for healing.

The good news is I am confident that the outpouring of unity and strength and fellowship and love across Charleston today, from all races, from all faiths, from all places of worship indicates the degree to which those old vestiges of hatred can be overcome. That, certainly, was Dr. King’s hope just over 50 years ago, after four little girls were killed in a bombing in a black church in Birmingham, Alabama.

He said they lived meaningful lives, and they died nobly. “They say to each of us,” Dr. King said, “black and white alike, that we must substitute courage for caution. They say to us that we must be concerned not merely with [about] who murdered them, but about the system, the way of life, the philosophy which produced the murderers. Their death says to us that we must work passionately and unrelentingly for the realization of the American Dream.

“And if one will hold on, he will discover that God walks with him, and that God is able to lift you from the fatigue of despair to the buoyancy of hope, and transform dark and desolate valleys into sunlit paths of inner peace.”

Reverend Pinckney and his congregation understood that spirit. Their Christian faith compelled them to reach out not just to members of their congregation, or to members of their own communities, but to all in need. They opened their doors to strangers who might enter a church in search of healing or redemption.

Mother Emanuel church and its congregation have risen before –- from flames, from an earthquake, from other dark times -– to give hope to generations of Charlestonians. And with our prayers and our love, and the buoyancy of hope, it will rise again now as a place of peace.

So, he didn't just talk about our "dark past".
Spiny Norman

Social climber
Boring, Oregon
Jun 19, 2015 - 02:09pm PT
"These nut cases always pick a presumed "gun free zone" to attack, never one where they are likely to encounter an armed defender."

Unless you count, say, last week's assault on the Dallas Police Department. To take just one among many, many examples.

Try harder.
dave729

Trad climber
Western America
Jun 19, 2015 - 02:20pm PT
Who has not suffered for the sins of their parents Locker.

And SC must have gun laws where you can't just give a pistol
to another person without a fed background check and paperwork
handled by a licened gun dealer?
10b4me

Social climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 02:20pm PT
The quickest way to stop an evil man with a gun, is a good one with one.

What if the good one misses, Wendell?
Norton

Social climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 02:25pm PT
And SC must have gun laws where you can't just give a pistol
to another person without a fed background check and paperwork
handled by a licened gun dealer?

nope

like most southern states SC has very permissive gun laws

anyone can buy a gun from anyone else

only a new gun requires a background check through a gun dealer
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 19, 2015 - 02:39pm PT
instead keep quietly insisting that is the price we pay to live "free"

I'm not "quietly" insisting. I'm flatly stating it.

Freedom does not equal safety or security. Freedom actually implies a certain lack of safety and security. Freedom isn't free... or so the free and brave used to understand.

Of course, today we are certainly no longer the land of the free and the home of the brave. We've become a nation of government-dependent, hand-wringing, simpering pussies! "Oh, save me! Save me whatever the cost!"

Pathetic!

And, again, no proposed gun law would have prevented this. This sicko would have probably passed a background check right up until the moment he decided to reveal his nuttiness.
dirtbag

climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 02:47pm PT
Yes madbolter, let all them pussies die.

I have mine.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 19, 2015 - 03:02pm PT
Crank - I heard the speech. I'll take your point. And I agree that he has had to make these speeches too many times, I'm sure he's sick of it. FWIW the transcript you posted is heavily edited, we'll just have to agree to disagree on certain aspects of the content. Cheers.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 19, 2015 - 03:03pm PT
And, again, no proposed gun law would have prevented this.

Pure speculation.
We don't know that since they aren't enacted

Edit, maybe with a few more deterrents people might start being more careful about who they give a gun to.
Purely speculation on my part, but I can dream like you.
Spiny Norman

Social climber
Boring, Oregon
Jun 19, 2015 - 03:06pm PT
And, again, no proposed gun law would have prevented this.

Uh huh.

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/07/a-land-without-guns-how-japan-has-virtually-eliminated-shooting-deaths/260189/?utm_source=SFFB

What is the role of guns in Japan, the developed world's least firearm-filled nation and perhaps its strictest controller? In 2008, the U.S. had over 12 thousand firearm-related homicides. All of Japan experienced only 11, fewer than were killed at the Aurora shooting alone. And that was a big year: 2006 saw an astounding two, and when that number jumped to 22 in 2007, it became a national scandal. By comparison, also in 2008, 587 Americans were killed just by guns that had discharged accidentally.

Now, I'm a firearm owner and I have a CCW permit. But it is an act of intellectual cowardice and dishonesty to pretend that the benefits stemming from our freedom to own firearms are without immense costs as well.

Every policy has benefits and costs. If you are not willing to discuss both, you have no right to participate in a serious conversation.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 19, 2015 - 03:07pm PT
And SC must have gun laws where you can't just give a pistol
to another person.....

Was he from South Carolina?
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 19, 2015 - 03:19pm PT
What's pathetic is that people are walking around like Wild Bill Dumbfuk shooting innocent people...

Agreed!

But that isn't solved by becoming simpering losers as a nation!
dave729

Trad climber
Western America
Jun 19, 2015 - 03:38pm PT
Reports are saying he was taking some nasty drug called suboxone.

People can become horribly violent when they 'stop' taking it.

http://www.mdjunction.com/forums/addiction-discussions/general-support/10035871-can-coming-off-suboxone-make-you-violent-


http://www.infowars.com/charleston-shooter-was-on-drug-linked-to-violent-outbursts/


"Monsters don't just pop into existence you dumbsh#t, they have to be made."
-Dr Frankenstein
dave729

Trad climber
Western America
Jun 19, 2015 - 04:11pm PT
Suprema - Ok. Sure. Suboxone is powerfull. It can and is script'd
just for pain and must be noted on the bottle as such.
If its for opiate withdrawal there is more paperwork for the dr
to do.
Illegal street sales of suboxone is a growing problem
Seems everyone reacts differently when stopping taking it
from nothing more that feeling uncomfortable to mass killer
like Dylann Storm Roof.



http://ssristories.org/

SSRI Stories
Antidepressant Nightmares
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 19, 2015 - 04:31pm PT
We do indeed need to put more focus on addiction issues and how they're being dealt within our country...

Now we're talking!
dave729

Trad climber
Western America
Jun 19, 2015 - 04:37pm PT
How to catch the ones who purposely fall through the cracks?

Remember: Authorities have said that Andreas Lubitz, the co-pilot who is believed to have intentionally crashed the German aircraft, killing himself and the other 149 people aboard, had a mental illness and hid the diagnosis from his employer.
Officials say that the police had found antidepressants during a search of his apartment in Düsseldorf.
crankster

Trad climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 04:39pm PT
FWIW the transcript you posted is heavily edited, we'll just have to agree to disagree on certain aspects of the content. Cheers.

I was just making the point that he said a lot more than most on the right are mentioning. They are accusing the president of being decisive, which is ridiculous. He's calling for a national dialog on gun violence. We've got to try to do something instead of going back about our business until the next incident.

Brooding, troubled young men committing mass murder with guns....its unfathomable. I don't have the answer.
dave729

Trad climber
Western America
Jun 19, 2015 - 04:49pm PT
..says suprema taco advocate for big pharma.
So let it be written. So let it be done.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 19, 2015 - 04:51pm PT
Millions of people are addicted to sh#t.

Only one of them shot up a church this week.
thebravecowboy

climber
liberated libertine
Jun 19, 2015 - 05:21pm PT
DMT FTW.
And yeah, madbolter, I am curious as to how gun-lessness begets simpering loserness. Are you saying that your gun the man makes? If so, that seems soft.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 19, 2015 - 05:30pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
dave729

Trad climber
Western America
Jun 19, 2015 - 05:45pm PT
Get that counseling going.



wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Jun 19, 2015 - 05:51pm PT



Says it all right there.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 19, 2015 - 05:54pm PT
Says nothing.

one fought the cops

one didn't

one was a 21 YO healthy kid. that meekly surrendered.

The other was morbidly a obese diabetic with advanced heart disease that chose to resist.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 19, 2015 - 06:12pm PT
Your New York fatality was entirely the doing of "progressive" governance that required the police to arrest someone for the great crime of selling single cigarettes.

The supervising officer in that case?

She is black.
10b4me

Social climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 06:18pm PT

Says nothing.

one fought the cops

one didn't

one was a 21 YO healthy kid. that meekly surrendered.

The other was morbidly a obese diabetic with advanced heart disease that chose to resist.

What a dumb comment, Wendell.
He was resisting because he was in a choke hold.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 19, 2015 - 06:25pm PT
Police procedure in New York has no relevance to a crazy in SC.

Trying to draw irrelevant political parallels diminished both the memories of the slain and the evil of the perpetrator.


Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 19, 2015 - 06:33pm PT
And the Confederate flag still proudly flies in front of the South Carolina State Legislature.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 19, 2015 - 06:48pm PT
madbolter, I am curious as to how gun-lessness begets simpering loserness. Are you saying that your gun the man makes? If so, that seems soft.

It isn't hard to understand, if you are an American.

See, Americans recognize that a government is legitimate only insofar as it upholds and protects inalienable rights. Unlike the rest of the world, our founding documents rest upon this fundamental truth.

Thus....

Right to life > Right to self-defense > Right to the means of self defense.

All are inalienable rights, including the right (and responsibility) to resist tyranny when the government forgets the most fundamental reason why it exists. These rights trump all governments, laws, amendments, or other inventions of government.

The "simpering loser" bit comes from the "Save me, protect me, nourish me, take care of me, please oh please" mentality that has consumed this nation.

Those who responsibly carry guns do so because they don't merely proxy off their self-defense onto the government. Responsible gun-carriers take responsibility for themselves and recognize that the government cannot in principle keep them safe, provide for their every need (and whim), nor be there in time when crisis hits.

The old saw is totally true and has been evidenced repeatedly, including in times like this very tragedy we're discussing: When seconds count, the police are mere minutes away.

The contrast is between a nation full of the free and brave who are able and responsible to take care of themselves vs. a nation full of simpering losers (as we pretty much have become now).

I know, I know.... Half this nation can't withdraw their lips from the teat long enough to look up and catch even a glimpse of the freedom that once was. But half of us can see what we're losing at a rapid rate, and we don't want your "security" and "safety" foisted off on us!
thebravecowboy

climber
liberated libertine
Jun 19, 2015 - 06:54pm PT
no relevance to each other

Actually, it does. Same nation, same history, some linkage of consciousness between individuals = relevance between awfulness across our nation.

thebravecowboy

climber
liberated libertine
Jun 19, 2015 - 06:55pm PT
Hey Madbolter
if you are an american
you should go back to humping Joe McCarthy's leg.

And truly, let us all carry guns responsibly, upon infringement by the big bad brudda^not a simpering loser
crankster

Trad climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 06:59pm PT
TGT, I feel sorry for you.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 19, 2015 - 07:03pm PT
Hey brave cowboy - congratulations on your succinct reply to one who so proudly represents the kind of sick arrogance that is destroying your nation.

Couldn't have said it better myself.
Risk

Mountain climber
Olympia, WA
Jun 19, 2015 - 07:08pm PT

Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 19, 2015 - 07:23pm PT
hey werner - who you talking to?
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 19, 2015 - 07:24pm PT
Well since most or all of the white supremacists in those pics are dead by now, and few are willing to walk in their shoes, then I guess your point is that we are heading down the right path? We're better off today than then?

He's calling for a national dialog on gun violence. We've got to try to do something instead of going back about our business until the next incident.

If you read my post you would see me encourage the President to enter the gun debate by actually putting up a bill. Actually proposing something. Let the debate begin. But maybe after the bodies of these victims are laid to rest.

But he's a shrewd politician. If he sees a battle he can't win, better to just be rhetorical than to place a bet? I dunno. We'll see what he comes up with. Carry on.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Jun 19, 2015 - 07:35pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Norton

Social climber
Jun 19, 2015 - 08:06pm PT
um

a President cannot "put up a bill"

he can only sign the legislation that congress passes, basic civics, you knew that
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 19, 2015 - 09:11pm PT
Yes, everyone should carry a gun to church.


You have an inalienable right to self defend yourself, thats where your inalienable rights stop. It is not an inalienable right to carry a gun.

You seem to quickly to blame this country on a few when the real problem with the country is much deeper. The inability for our financial banks, corporations to deal honestly are just a few that rape our government. Our country is riddled with crooks at all levels and you want to complain about a few that need the teat, or more appropriately, those that honestly need a little help since their jobs went overseas or lost their retirement due to finacial crooks. Yes there a some that are using the system out of laziness but there are far fewer of them than you think there are and we all want to get the ones that don't need it off their rear ends.

To whom ever posted above something about law enforcement just being minutes away, they caught this guy miles away thanks to a citizen on her toes.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 19, 2015 - 09:22pm PT
That's what my father told me about pointing a weapon at somone.
Small world.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 19, 2015 - 09:32pm PT
suprema and johnboy: I think between you guys, you've summed up the whole sad nightmare of gun culture.

P.S.: As far as someone not taking this piece of white trash down while he was reloading, it's a sad facet of human nature that people often freeze up in life threatening situations.
thebravecowboy

climber
liberated libertine
Jun 19, 2015 - 09:40pm PT
no human being is trash.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 19, 2015 - 10:35pm PT
It is not an inalienable right to carry a gun.

It IS an inalienable right to carry the reasonable means to adequately respond to any individual threat one is going to encounter. If you don't agree with that statement, then you don't agree with the right to self-defense, so you don't agree with the right to life.

As long as bad guys threaten individuals with guns, individuals have an inalienable right to carry guns to respond to such threats. Eliminate the gun threat entirely (if you possibly can; it's not been done anywhere!), and you thereby reduce the "arms" one has a right to carry to those weapons that are then the threats wielded against individuals.

The very fact that there are upwards of 300 million guns and that millions and millions of responsible Americans carry them around daily gives the lie to your worry about continual shoot-outs in stores, malls, etc. In actual fact, there are very, very, VERY few irresponsible incidents in public considering the number of gun-carriers, a much better ratio than irresponsible driving incidents to drivers.

The worry is not the rank and file American with a gun. The worry is the nutjob and/or regular criminal with a gun. Solve THAT problem, and then you'll get somewhere with your "anti-gun for Americans" perspective. And you won't solve THAT problem by making (any sort of) guns illegal. The feds have offered no evidence that they can eliminate or even substantially reduce a black market!
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 19, 2015 - 11:21pm PT
a President cannot "put up a bill"

Surely you gest. Presidents put up bills all the time. Yes they do it through legislative channels. It's called leading.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 20, 2015 - 12:13am PT
What a dumb comment, Wendell.
He was resisting because he was in a choke hold.



I hate to get drawn further into this crossfire, but one thing always bothered me about that explanation, and I have yet to hear a coherent explanation. How could someone in a strangling choke hold say "I can't breathe?"

John
WBraun

climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 07:16am PT
The kid sits for an hour in the back checking out the scene.

Then decides its time, ... even though he had second thoughts that these people are too nice but starts his killing anyways.

Then has to reload the gun 5 times.

Reload 5 times!!!

While reloading the gun the victims are just sitting/standing there waiting for him to reload to shoot them????

How does this work ...... ?????
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 07:25am PT
I hate to get drawn further into this crossfire, but one thing always bothered me about that explanation, and I have yet to hear a coherent explanation. How could someone in a strangling choke hold say "I can't breathe?"


Perhaps his notice was not properly served since he did not say, "my ability to breathe is becoming rapidly diminished"?

I would suggest having someone with very strong hands put a hold on you and see if you can get three words out. I'm pretty sure you'll be able to.


In the immortal words of Toby Keith (I am wondering whether tody was asked (and if so why) or whether he just decided the U.S. needed his opinion. He'll probably just say, why does the U.S need yours or the other 100 or so writing about this on the ST).

"If it can happen in church, it can happen anywhere, so there's no answer to it," Keith said.

"Countries all over the world that have really strict gun polices, like Oslo, Norway. It happens there."

Begs the question of the frequency with which it happens.

Dick_Lugar_II

Trad climber
Center of My Universe...
Jun 20, 2015 - 07:42am PT
Bring back medieval torture for crimes like this...quartering comes to mind...or tar and feather...or the rack...and see how many psychos step up to the plate for their day in the media and quest for infamy??!
crankster

Trad climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 07:55am PT
With all respect, we are lot going to have much luck changing things if people stubbornly stick to their views about guns. Why not be open to the idea that some changes might be helpful and still allow people to keep the millions and millions of firearms already in private hands?
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Jun 20, 2015 - 08:02am PT
good parenting is a lost art...

Nonsense. Why do people keep saying stuff like this?

I know thousands and thousands of parents, and good parenting is quite the norm among all of them.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 20, 2015 - 08:10am PT
A Northerner bows, deeply, to the South:

I have never seen anything like what I saw on television this afternoon. Did you hear the statements made at the bond hearing of the alleged Charleston, S.C., shooter?

Nine beautiful people slaughtered Wednesday night during Bible study at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, and their relatives were invited to make a statement today in court. Did you hear what they said?

They spoke of mercy. They offered forgiveness. They invited the suspect, who was linked in by video from jail, to please look for God.

There was no rage, no accusation—just broken hearts undefended and presented for the world to see. They sobbed as they spoke.

“I just wanted everybody to know, to you, I forgive you,” said the daughter of Ethel Lance, killed in the shooting. “You took something very precious away from me. I will never talk to her ever again. I will never be able to hold her again. But I forgive you.” She asked that God have mercy on the shooter’s soul. “You hurt me. You hurt a lot of people. May God forgive you. And I forgive you.”

A family member of Anthony Thompson said he forgave the shooter. “I forgive you and my family forgives you, but we would like you to take this opportunity to repent . . . confess, give your life to the one who matters the most, Christ, so that He can change it—can change your ways no matter what happens to you, and you will be OK. Do that and you will be better.”

The mother of Tywanza Sanders, also killed, told the shooter: “We welcomed you Wednesday night in our Bible study with open arms,” she said. “Every fiber in my body hurts, and I will never be the same. . . . Tywanza was my hero. But as we said in Bible study, we enjoyed you, but may God have mercy on you.”

The granddaughter of Daniel Simmons Sr., also killed Wednesday, said, “Although my grandfather and the other victims died at the hands of hate, this is proof—everyone’s plea for your soul is proof that they lived in love and their legacies will live in love. So, hate won’t win. . . . I just want to thank the courts for making sure that hate doesn’t win.”

As I watched I felt I was witnessing something miraculous. I think I did. It was people looking into the eyes of evil, into the eyes of the sick and ignorant shooter who’d blasted a hole in their families, and explaining to him with the utmost forbearance that there is a better way.

What a country that makes such people. Do you ever despair about America? If they are America we are going to be just fine.

Afterward, outside the courtroom, people gathered and sang gospel hymns.

* * *
I just have to say what a people the people of Charleston are. They are doing something right, something beautiful, to be who they’ve been the past few days.

From the beginning they handled the tragedy with such heart and love. They handled it like a community, a real, alive one that people live within connected to each other.

From Thursday morning when news first spread everyone I saw on TV, from the mayor, Joseph Riley, to those who spoke for the church, to the police spokesmen, to the governor, Nikki Haley—they were all so dignified and genuinely grieving, and not the pseudo-grief we always see when something bad happens and the leader says our prayers are with the victims. Haley had to stop speaking for a few moments, so moved was she when she made her first statement. Riley said today, of the shooter, “This hateful person came to this community with this crazy idea that he would be able to divide us, but all he did was make us more united and love each other even more.” I read that quote Friday afternoon in the Journal, in Valerie Bauerlein’s story, and I thought: Riley isn’t just talking, he is telling the truth.

Charleston deserves something, a bow. So too do the beautiful people who go to Wednesday night Bible study in America in 2015. They are the people who are saving America every day, completely unheralded, and we can hardly afford to lose them.

There’s only one thing Charleston doesn’t deserve. People apart from the trauma, far away, have already begun to bring their political agenda items to the tragedy and make sure they are debated. Because this is the right time for a political debate, right?

Here’s an idea: Why don’t you leave the grieving alone right now? Why don’t you not impose your agenda items on them? Why don’t you not force them to debate while they have tears in their throats?

Don’t politicize their pain. Don’t turn this into a debate on a flag or guns. Don’t use it to make your points and wave your finger from your high horse.

These people are doing it right without you.

They are loving each other and helping each other. Let them grieve in peace. And respect them as what they are, heroic.
jstan

climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 08:17am PT
Possibly we are being rendered helpless by our idea that we need a perfect solution. All we can really do is make many small changes that add up to a shift in the trends. On the heels of so many shootings of unarmed blacks by officers, this new tragedy seems to be hitting deeply. Just as occurred in 1954. One can hope.

People who are pissed off rely on emotions alone and they never forget. This is probably a survival strategy. You see this everywhere even today. Do you suppose we will ever learn from the past?

The Civil War was not necessary. If the North had merely passed a law empowering expenditure of three or four billion dollars to compensate slave owners for their investment in slaves the owners might have lined up for the deal. The following 100 years of Jim Crow shows it would have been a financial positive and the basic transaction would have had "give" welded to "take". Wars attempt to decouple this transaction and everyone loses ten fold. Think how much oil we could have purchased without even a ripple in Iraq for two trillion dollars.

We will be paying the costs of these two mistakes on into the indefinite future.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 20, 2015 - 08:36am PT
you can try it on yourself JE

Put your hands around your own throat, and see how easy it is to say those three words
"I can't Breath"
and yet, you still can't Breath!

This was proven scientifically the day after the execution, but the Right Wing fake media keeps perpetuating the lie
son of stan

Boulder climber
San Jose CA
Jun 20, 2015 - 08:45am PT
I respectfully disagree. People like to fight. People also are expected to say they don't and want peace but the record says fighting is the preferred choice if the odds seem good.

Civil War was bloody slaughter because people showed up and fought.
And fought enthusiastically!

In those times nothing special in the horror of 22,000 dead and wounded soldiers at the battle of Sharpsburg MD in just ONE day. September 17 1862.

White people hardly ever kill black people anymore in the US.
So don't fall for the propaganda.



Spiny Norman

Social climber
Boring, Oregon
Jun 20, 2015 - 09:18am PT
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2015/06/19/an-australian-stand-up-comic-explains-what-u-s-gun-laws-look-like-to-the-rest-of-the-world/?tid=sm_fb
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 20, 2015 - 10:40am PT

From his facebook page
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 20, 2015 - 10:41am PT
The current speculation is that guns are an inalienable right.
Tobia

Social climber
Denial
Jun 20, 2015 - 10:46am PT
I don't own a firearm, and never have, so I don't think I qualify as a "gun nut."

I've owned a gun or guns since I was 8 or 9 years old. I don't consider myself a "gun nut" either.

But that has little to do with the tragedy being discussed. The whole thing is bizarre. The father's gift of a .45 pistol to a convicted felon was certainly not indicative of good parenting. I would assume, he thought the boy needed it for personal protection. No matter, obviously it was not a good idea.

Whether or not his father had any of the warped philosophies of his son is not known. I doubt that he would admit to any at this juncture.

Sitting in a church for an hour and then slowly and methodically killing these people is shocking; yet I believe that most of these types of killings all involve a period of indecisiveness; perhaps not immediately prior to their acts, nor in their immediate audience. It seems to me it would have made him decide not to follow through with it, that is to say that he would realize that these are real people and not some innate makings of his twisted mind.

The forgiving nature of the friends and family of the victims is the only part of the event that makes sense to me. Forgiveness is a major act that the Christian Faith is based on, forgiveness of self as well as others. Admittedly, being a Christian myself, I believe I would struggle with being asked to forgive so much, so suddenly. I pray I never have to.

I can't think of any alternative that would be more productive to counter the actions of this killer than forgiveness. Legislation only works for those who obey laws, revenge or rioting will not produce positive change. The perpetrator will certainly end up in a prison cell for the rest of his life and that is where he belongs; but that will not stop another lunatic from committing a similar act.

Crimpergirl

Sport climber
Boulder, Colorado!
Jun 20, 2015 - 10:55am PT
Not everybody runs or hits the ground in the face of gun fire. I won't doubt the actions of anyone in that situation.

"Sanders could have sought to flee. He instead placed himself between the gun and his aunt. He was killed and now his mother stood in the courtroom, addressing the killer."
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Jun 20, 2015 - 01:31pm PT
No good gun owner there obviously and no one with the fortitude to jump him as he reloaded. That is a shame.
Evidently the massacre was much more complicated than assumed. It was not a spur of the moment thing, he had planned it carefully. He was in the basement room with his victims for over an hour.There were people of all ages from a 5 year old girl who survived by playing dead to women of "advanced age". He had plenty of time to work out his plan of who to shoot first.
If you had been there looking all tough and shitttt, he'd likely have shot you first. And the cops would have pried your unfired gun from your cold dead hand.
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Jun 20, 2015 - 01:48pm PT
I've owned a gun or guns since I was 8 or 9 years old. I don't consider myself a "gun nut" either.

But that has little to do with the tragedy being discussed. The whole thing is bizarre. The father's gift of a .45 revolver to a convicted felon was certainly not indicative of good parenting.
You are proud of owning a gun since you were 8 or 9.
This monster was given a gun for his (20th I think) birthday. By his dad.
His dad is guilty of bad parenting and yours wasn't?
Tobia

Social climber
Denial
Jun 20, 2015 - 01:50pm PT
But I don't buy it...

and you never will, for it ain't for sale.
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Jun 20, 2015 - 02:02pm PT
Now it's reported that he bought his own gun.
One key part of this horrific scheme — the weapon — came in April, when Roof bought a .45-caliber handgun at a Charleston gun store, the two law enforcement officials told Perez and Bruer from CNN.
His grandfather said he gave him birthday money and had no idea how he had spent it.
10b4me

Social climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 02:03pm PT
Where was "GOD" during the shooting???...


Isn't it HIS house where this took place???...



Real progress would be if everyone entered the 21st century...

good questions.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 02:09pm PT

So, what CAN be done to mitigate the likelihood of mass murder anyway?

THREAT ASSESSMENT, for starters

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a30024/mass-shooters-1014/
Tobia

Social climber
Denial
Jun 20, 2015 - 02:21pm PT
high traverse,

I am neither proud nor ashamed of gun ownership, it is just a fact. I made the statement to contrast the concept of "gun nuts", expressed earlier in the thread. Gun ownership does not equate with fanaticism.

A convicted felon has no right to gun ownership; which would indicate a poor decision by his parent.

I learned gun safety before I was given a gun. I went hunting with my father many times before he ever let me shoot. I am still learning gun safety. I teach gun safety or better said, constantly point it out. Most of my guns are shotguns, the first being a single shot .410 gauge. Our guns were for small game hunting. I have a rifle for deer hunting and a few pesky critters that are not indigenous to this area. I have a pistol that was passed down from my late uncle. I don't think I have ever fired it more than twice.

So no, my father is not guilty of bad parenting; at least in terms of the firearms. What do you think?

edit:
If he bought it himself and from a licensed firearm dealer, the gun dealer is officially out of business and guilty of a crime.



Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 20, 2015 - 02:24pm PT
High Traverse: My compliments to you for your response to the comment blaming the victims for not reacting like a room full of Rambos.

Unless someone has been in the middle of a mass shooting and, unarmed, took the weapon away from the bad guy, it defies belief that anyone could make such a statement.

Here's a short story from my own life, and it DID NOT involve gun play or any form of heroics on my part: Many years ago, I was in an atrium when I heard a shout of distress and ran over to see what was going on. Turned out that when I arrived along with another guy, there was a guy hanging by his neck from a rope. We got him down and, as I had first aid training, I started to do the ABCs on him. Just like we were taught in class, I directly asked one of the maybe eight spectators who had arrived (and I knew by name) to call an ambulance. The person I addressed stood there like a deer transfixed by car headlights. I tried again with the next one with the same result and on and on down the line. Not one person moved. Finally the guy who had helped me get the fellow down took off and made the call.

The point of this story is that everyone froze up and their lives were not in any danger whatsoever. People are people, and shock and/or fear can cause human beings to just stand there doing nothing during emergencies.

I can only wonder what it was like for those poor people to be in the middle of that nightmare, but there was most certainly a humanity present among them that was completely absent in the mind of the shooter.
Mick Ryan

Trad climber
The Peaks
Jun 20, 2015 - 02:28pm PT
scrubbing bubbles wrote..."the problem is it always happens to "someone else"

"when a 2nd Amendment fanatic has his son or daughter killed like this, then rest assured they will re-think gun control"

I read the whole thread, and the above speaks volumes.

Think of the pain, loss and suffering the Sandy Hook parents have to live with for the rest of their lives.

Just try to imagine that.

And if you could, just a little - things would change
Norton

Social climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 02:44pm PT
I do not believe "he" was a convicted felon.

Was he?
Tobia

Social climber
Denial
Jun 20, 2015 - 02:50pm PT
From what I read the morning following the incident, it was reported he convicted of a felony drug possession; that fact may have been erroneous. I haven't read much about the shooting since.

He would not have passed the background check to make the sale legal by the gun shop; so maybe it was an error in reporting.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 02:53pm PT
Mr. Roof had two prior brushes with the law, both in recent months, according to court records. In February, he attracted attention at the Columbiana Centre, a shopping mall, by asking store employees “out-of-the-ordinary questions” such as how many people were working and what time they would be leaving, according to a police report. An officer who responded searched him and found Suboxone, a prescription drug used to treat opiate addiction and frequently sold in illegal street transactions. Mr. Roof admitted that he did not have a prescription for the drug, the report said, and he was arrested and charged with felony drug possession. The case is continuing.

In April, Mr. Roof was charged with trespassing on the roof of the same mall. The police report said he had been banned from the mall for a year after the previous arrest. Mr. Roof was convicted on that charge, a misdemeanor.

http://gawker.com/heres-what-we-know-about-the-alleged-charleston-shooter-1712278933
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 20, 2015 - 03:08pm PT
Not convicted felon, but an indicted one.

Banned from possessing a firearm or having one transferred to him under SC law just the same.

Dad and grandpa if both are involved in the purchase and transfer should see real jail time.

Does anyone really believe that no one in the family, including his pa didn't know what was on his Facebook page?

Evidently his sister did and dropped a dime on him as soon as she saw the surveillance camera footage on TV and identified him.
Tobia

Social climber
Denial
Jun 20, 2015 - 03:10pm PT
The legal loophole that allowed Dylann Roof to get get a gun
Tobia

Social climber
Denial
Jun 20, 2015 - 03:45pm PT
I hate to add to the baggage here but the fact that he reloaded 5 times begs brings up a point of contention.

If he reloaded 5 times that translates to 4-5 rounds per victim; as a .45 clip holds 8 rounds; which means he either missed often or was hell bent on making sure they were dead.

The time involved depends on how many clips he had. If he had multiple clips he could change them out rapidly. If he only had one or two, it would take a few minutes to feed shells into the clip.

That must have been an eternity for those that were still living while he did so.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 20, 2015 - 05:06pm PT
Rdog: It was you that criticized the victims for not tackling the shooter. I can hardly for you to tell us how many crazed gunmen you've disarmed while people are screaming and dying all around you.

For what it's worth, the entire WORLD is pissed off about this shooting.

While, admittedly, on occasion, similar outrages occur in other advanced industrial democracies, it would not be much of a stretch to say that they nearly never happen in any of these nations.

These massacres are almost routine in the U.S., and there is something evil about the way the "rights" of gun owners overwhelmingly overshadow those of human beings who would prefer not to get shot.
crankster

Trad climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 05:20pm PT
It's Ron.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 20, 2015 - 05:26pm PT
crankster: wouldn't surprise me a damn bit.
jstan

climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 05:27pm PT
there is something evil about the way the "rights" of gun owners overwhelmingly overshadow those of human beings who would prefer not to get shot.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^+10
Gene

climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 05:49pm PT
Can anyone tell me the ratio of firearm deaths in the US of A by murder or accident compared to the 'righteous' shootings of someone defending his/her person or their castle?
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 20, 2015 - 05:51pm PT
Does self defense with a gun require that the gun be fired?
GDavis

Social climber
SOL CAL
Jun 20, 2015 - 06:06pm PT
He even screws up his ellipses with commas like Ron...

Good to have ya back bud. Keep yer nose clean this time 'round.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 20, 2015 - 06:10pm PT
Rdog: It's now apparent that you can't read. Check my last post again and attempt to understand the clear wording that I used. I await an apology for your poor reading skills.

I have always been careful to make it clear that I have no animosity to citizens of the United States, and am proud to call many U.S. citizens friends of mine. That said, I have a serious problem with inhabitants of any nation who seem to feel that the possession of lethal weaponry is somehow equated with the size of their penis, and have nothing but contempt for those who shrug off these atrocities as a fair price to pay for their "right" to own firearms.

Now it's your turn. Tell us how many massacres you have stopped while standing amidst screams of terror while the dead and dying piled up around you.

You should be ashamed of yourself for dishonouring those helpless people for failing to measure up to your Hollywood-fuelled delusions of how people behave during these nightmares.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 20, 2015 - 06:39pm PT
Rdog: No, I'm not a particularly bitter person, unless you consider my outrage at yet another senseless massacre as bitterness. If so, my bitterness is shared by millions of your fellow countrymen who are also sickened by these outrages.

I find it actually amusing that you're such an intellectual featherweight that you have completely ignored my response to your previous ill-informed posting... although I must commend you for your heroic defence of my appalling slur against female gun owners.

Come to think of it, how many women unleash these avalanches of horror upon innocent people?


Check out americanbar.org for access to a legally respectable perspective on gun violence in the U.S.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 06:45pm PT
Rdog can't be ron anderson

ron knows ChrisMac and RJ Spurrier banned him and don't want him around here

Ron would respect that and not try to come back under another username.......................
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 20, 2015 - 06:57pm PT
Welcome back Ron, we new you couldn't stay away.
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 07:11pm PT
Presumed innocent. Sure looks it here.



“I chose Charleston because it is most historic city in my state, and at one time had the highest ratio of blacks to Whites in the country,” the manifesto says. “We have no skinheads, no real KKK, no one doing anything but talking on the internet. Well someone has to have the bravery to take it to the real world, and I guess that has to be me.

I don't go to church, but if I was there and escaped the first fusillade, Roof would have been heard to utter the infamous phase "I can't breathe" and we wouldn't be worrying about his innocence. Let God forgive him.

zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 07:47pm PT
Mitt Romney

Former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Saturday joined those calling for South Carolina to remove the Confederate flag from the statehouse grounds in the wake of Wednesday's deadly shooting at a historic black church in Charleston.

"To many, it is a symbol of racial hatred. Remove it now to honor Charleston victims," Romney said in a Twitter post Saturday.

I do not know what Donald Trump thinks or has said.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 20, 2015 - 09:25pm PT
The legal loophole that allowed Dylann Roof to get get a gun

Show of hands....

How many here really believe that a universal background check law would have been obeyed (or even cared about) by these goofballs?

"Oh, but then at least it would have made the gift illegal!"

Yayyy... but to my knowledge murder is already illegal everywhere in this grand USA.

"Yeaaahhhhh.... we'll just legislate this badness right out of existence!"

Good luck with that.
DanaB

climber
CT
Jun 20, 2015 - 09:33pm PT
Those who responsibly carry guns do so because they don't merely proxy off their self-defense onto the government.

Who needs a gun for self-defense? Anyone who has posted here up to this point? If so, why?
thebravecowboy

climber
liberated libertine
Jun 20, 2015 - 09:35pm PT
it's because fear.
DanaB

climber
CT
Jun 20, 2015 - 09:44pm PT
Are the people who are passionate about their Constitutional right to own a gun willing to be called out, armed, organized, and disciplined by Congress?
Risk

Mountain climber
Olympia, WA
Jun 20, 2015 - 09:45pm PT
minimize terrorism, hatred and racism. . . . Justify your position how you wish. . . .
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 20, 2015 - 10:27pm PT
DanaB: I'm pretty sure that the answer to your question is...

definitely not.

I'm also just about positive that they actually think that they alone are the rightful owners of the word "patriot."
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jun 20, 2015 - 10:33pm PT
Sorry, DNC North holds the copyright on "Patriot."
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 20, 2015 - 10:40pm PT
Who needs a gun for self-defense? Anyone who has posted here up to this point? If so, why?

Twice in my life. Both times, just revealing my holstered gun was sufficient to "deescalate" the situation.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 10:41pm PT
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.

Topic Author's Reply - Jun 20, 2015 - 06:10pm PT

I have always been careful to make it clear that I have no animosity to citizens of the United States, and am proud to call many U.S. citizens friends of mine. That said, I have a serious problem with inhabitants of any nation who seem to feel that the possession of lethal weaponry is somehow equated with the size of their penis, and have nothing but contempt for those who shrug off these atrocities as a fair price to pay for their "right" to own firearms.

Face palm.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 20, 2015 - 10:48pm PT
DanaB: I'm pretty sure that the answer to your question is...

definitely not.

You beg the question. We're talking about a whole church full of people who needed even one or two of them to be armed. But none were, partly thanks to their own pastor who voted to disallow concealed carry in churches.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 20, 2015 - 10:50pm PT
Johnnyrig: I'm actually reasonably fluent in the English language, but I haven't the faintest idea what you're trying to say.

Madbolter: only someone with a soul as sick as yours could sink so low as to blame the victims for their fate. Guns don't kill people, but arseholes with guns sure do.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 11:12pm PT
I'm saying you're insulting everyone in the U.S. who owns a gun. Again. Like, we haven't heard this sh#t before? I'm also cherry-picking a few nuggets from the paper I referenced in deleted posts to this sh#t show of a thread you started. Not that, you know, there aren't plenty of other websites where you can voice your opinion on such topics.
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32842.pdf

Chris McNamara

SuperTopo staff member


Topic Author's Original Post - Apr 7, 2015 - 04:47pm PT
Dear Forum,

We have added a new administrative policy: freezing threads that have devolved mostly into personal attacks. These threads will exist on the site so that earlier posts can live on. But nobody will be able to post to a frozen thread in the future.

Why are we doing this?

We’ve noticed most of the personal attacks on the site come from just a handful of people in just a handful of threads. Most often, these are threads which were off-topic to begin with, but which over time deteriorated into largely political debates. Once politicized, these threads then seem to degrade further into personal attacks. We simply don't want to host these kinds of discussions (despite their popularity), and thus we'd ask you to: a) please refrain from starting politically oriented threads on SuperTopo, and b) don't be surprised if a thread which has become infected with personal attacks is locked to prevent further discussion. While occasionally it is appropriate to delete posters and threads, we prefer not to do this. Hopefully freezing threads that devolve into personal attacks will help with an ongoing effort to keep the forum a friendly and informative resource for climbers of all ages and interests.

Thank you,

RJ Spurrier

SuperTopo staff member


May 20, 2015 - 11:56am PT

There are a great many places on the internet where the kinds of discussions Ron most commonly posted on, or started threads on, are appreciated. SuperTopo is simply not the right venue. We hope Ron will find an alternative site to express his many and thoughtful opinions. We'd be happy to have him back too, if he limited posts much more frequently to the kinds of things the climbing forum is intended for and avoid inappropriate posts.

How Many Guns Are in the United States?

The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) reported in a national survey that in 1994, 44 million
people, approximately 35% of households, owned 192 million firearms,...

By 2007, the number of
firearms had increased to approximately 294 million: 106 million handguns, 105 million rifles,
and 83 million shotguns.

How Often Are Guns Used in Homicides?

As Table 1 shows, reports submitted by state and local law enforcement agencies to the FBI and
published annually in the Uniform Crime Reports39 indicate that the firearms-related murder and
non-negligent manslaughter rate per 100,000 of the population decreased from 6.6 for 1993 to 3.6
for 2000. The rate held steady at 3.6 for 2001 and fluctuated thereafter between a high of 3.9 for
2006 and 2007, and a low of 3.2 for 2010. For 2011, it has remained at 3.2.

Table 2. Firearms-Related Deaths for All Ages
1993-2009
Yeara Homicides
Legal
Interventions Suicides Accidents Unknown
Total
Deaths
%
Change
year homicides legal suicide accidents unknown total %change
1993 18,253 318 18,940 1,521 563 39,596
1994 17,527 339 18,765 1,356 518 38,506 -2.8%
1995 15,551 284 18,503 1,225 394 35,958 -6.6%
1996 14,037 290 18,166 1,134 413 34,041 -5.3%
1997 13,252 270 17,566 981 367 32,437 -4.7%
1998 11,798 304 17,424 866 316 30,709 -5.3%
1999 10,828 299 16,599 824 324 28,875 -6.0%
2000 10,801 270 16,586 776 230 28,664 -0.7%
2001 11,348 323 16,869 802 231 29,574 3.2%
2002 11,829 300 17,108 762 243 30,243 2.3%
2003 11,920 347 16,907 730 232 30,137 -0.4%
2004 11,624 311 16,750 649 235 29,570 -1.9%
2005 12,352 330 17,002 789 221 30,695 3.8%
2006 12,791 360 16,883 642 220 30,897 0.7%
2007 12,632 351 17,352 613 276 31,224 1.1%
2008 12,179 326 18,223 592 273 31,593 1.1%
2009 11,493 333 18,735 554 232 31,347 -0.7
Source: National Center for Health Statistics.

I'll add here that while the number of homicides has decreased the number of suicides appears to have remained relatively constant. Consider that at the same time the population has grown, the RATE of suicide would effectively show a reduction. When viewed in the following table of the paper from which this was taken, regarding youths, the number of homicide, suicide, and accidental firearm deaths reduced by roughly half.

How Often Are Firearms Used in Self-Defense?
According to BJS, NCVS data from 1987 to 1992 indicate that in each of those years, roughly
62,200 victims of violent crime (1% of all victims of such crimes) used guns to defend
themselves.46 Another 20,000 persons each year used guns to protect property. Persons in the
business of self-protection (police officers, armed security guards) may have been included in the
survey.47 Another source of information on the use of firearms for self-defense is the National
Self-Defense Survey conducted by criminology professor Gary Kleck of Florida State University
in the spring of 1993. Citing responses from 4,978 households, Dr. Kleck estimated that handguns
had been used 2.1 million times per year for self-defense, and that all types of guns had been used
approximately 2.5 million times a year for that purpose during the 1988-1993 period.48
Why do these numbers vary by such a wide margin? Law enforcement agencies do not collect
information on the number of times civilians use firearms to defend themselves or their property
against attack. Such data have been collected in household surveys. The contradictory nature of
the available statistics may be partially explained by methodological factors. That is, these and
other criminal justice statistics reflect what is reported to have occurred, not necessarily the actual
number of times certain events occur. Victims and offenders are sometimes reluctant to be candid
with researchers. So, the number of incidents can only be estimated, making it difficult to state
with certainty the accuracy of statistics such as the number of times firearms are used in selfdefense.
For this and other reasons, criminal justice statistics often vary when different
methodologies are applied.


Table 4. Brady Background Checks for Firearms Transfers and Permits
1998-2009

year total denials
2009 10,764,237 150,013
Total 95,105,025 1,613,953

Reasons for denial are kind of interesting; but you'll have to get off your lazy ass and read the paper yourself.

And from the CDC:
Number of deaths for leading causes of death
Heart disease: 611,105
Cancer: 584,881
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 149,205
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 130,557
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,978
Alzheimer's disease: 84,767
Diabetes: 75,578
Influenza and Pneumonia: 56,979
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 47,112
Intentional self-harm (suicide): 41,149

You're more likely to die of the flu than a bullet.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 20, 2015 - 11:14pm PT
only someone with a soul as sick as yours could sink so low as to blame the victims for their fate. Guns don't kill people, but arseholes with guns sure do.

So now accusations of a "sick soul" just for not agreeing with your perspective are fine and dandy. Weak sauce.

Look, to be clear, since you apparently can't get a clue, there is a FACT of the matter. It's an objective FACT of the matter. I cited it as FACT, which (GET THIS!) it is.

There's no "blame," unless you see it as such, which is ironic indeed.

Seemingly, YOU prefer all people to be helpless victims, waiting on cops who will be ten minutes to arrive, instead of having the capacity to fend for themselves.

Personally, that seems really dumb to me. I prefer to have some chance of taking care of myself.

FACT is: the pastor agreed with you and voted the same in his role as legislator. I wonder if he would change his vote had he lived.

"It" will never happen to you until it does. And when it does, you'll apparently just sit there passively and hoping that the cops will FINALLY arrive.

I prefer to not have to wait.

When seconds count, the cops are just minutes away. Remember it. Burn it into your psyche. It is another FACT, and we just saw yet another reminder of that fact.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 11:24pm PT
I'm saying you're insulting everyone in the U.S. who owns a gun. Again. Like, we haven't heard this sh#t before? I'm also cherry-picking a few nuggets from the paper I referenced in deleted posts to this sh#t show of a thread you started. Not that, you know, there aren't plenty of other websites where you can voice your opinion on such topics.
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32842.pdf

Chris McNamara

SuperTopo staff member


Topic Author's Original Post - Apr 7, 2015 - 04:47pm PT
Dear Forum,

We have added a new administrative policy: freezing threads that have devolved mostly into personal attacks. These threads will exist on the site so that earlier posts can live on. But nobody will be able to post to a frozen thread in the future.

Why are we doing this?

We’ve noticed most of the personal attacks on the site come from just a handful of people in just a handful of threads. Most often, these are threads which were off-topic to begin with, but which over time deteriorated into largely political debates. Once politicized, these threads then seem to degrade further into personal attacks. We simply don't want to host these kinds of discussions (despite their popularity), and thus we'd ask you to: a) please refrain from starting politically oriented threads on SuperTopo, and b) don't be surprised if a thread which has become infected with personal attacks is locked to prevent further discussion. While occasionally it is appropriate to delete posters and threads, we prefer not to do this. Hopefully freezing threads that devolve into personal attacks will help with an ongoing effort to keep the forum a friendly and informative resource for climbers of all ages and interests.

Thank you,

RJ Spurrier

SuperTopo staff member


May 20, 2015 - 11:56am PT

There are a great many places on the internet where the kinds of discussions Ron most commonly posted on, or started threads on, are appreciated. SuperTopo is simply not the right venue. We hope Ron will find an alternative site to express his many and thoughtful opinions. We'd be happy to have him back too, if he limited posts much more frequently to the kinds of things the climbing forum is intended for and avoid inappropriate posts.

How Many Guns Are in the United States?

The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) reported in a national survey that in 1994, 44 million
people, approximately 35% of households, owned 192 million firearms,...

By 2007, the number of
firearms had increased to approximately 294 million: 106 million handguns, 105 million rifles,
and 83 million shotguns.

How Often Are Guns Used in Homicides?

As Table 1 shows, reports submitted by state and local law enforcement agencies to the FBI and
published annually in the Uniform Crime Reports39 indicate that the firearms-related murder and
non-negligent manslaughter rate per 100,000 of the population decreased from 6.6 for 1993 to 3.6
for 2000. The rate held steady at 3.6 for 2001 and fluctuated thereafter between a high of 3.9 for
2006 and 2007, and a low of 3.2 for 2010. For 2011, it has remained at 3.2.

Table 2. Firearms-Related Deaths for All Ages
1993-2009
Yeara Homicides
Legal
Interventions Suicides Accidents Unknown
Total
Deaths
%
Change
year homicides legal suicide accidents unknown total %change
1993 18,253 318 18,940 1,521 563 39,596
1994 17,527 339 18,765 1,356 518 38,506 -2.8%
1995 15,551 284 18,503 1,225 394 35,958 -6.6%
1996 14,037 290 18,166 1,134 413 34,041 -5.3%
1997 13,252 270 17,566 981 367 32,437 -4.7%
1998 11,798 304 17,424 866 316 30,709 -5.3%
1999 10,828 299 16,599 824 324 28,875 -6.0%
2000 10,801 270 16,586 776 230 28,664 -0.7%
2001 11,348 323 16,869 802 231 29,574 3.2%
2002 11,829 300 17,108 762 243 30,243 2.3%
2003 11,920 347 16,907 730 232 30,137 -0.4%
2004 11,624 311 16,750 649 235 29,570 -1.9%
2005 12,352 330 17,002 789 221 30,695 3.8%
2006 12,791 360 16,883 642 220 30,897 0.7%
2007 12,632 351 17,352 613 276 31,224 1.1%
2008 12,179 326 18,223 592 273 31,593 1.1%
2009 11,493 333 18,735 554 232 31,347 -0.7
Source: National Center for Health Statistics.

I'll add here that while the number of homicides has decreased the number of suicides appears to have remained relatively constant. Consider that at the same time the population has grown, the RATE of suicide would effectively show a reduction. When viewed in the following table of the paper from which this was taken, regarding youths, the number of homicide, suicide, and accidental firearm deaths reduced by roughly half.

How Often Are Firearms Used in Self-Defense?
According to BJS, NCVS data from 1987 to 1992 indicate that in each of those years, roughly
62,200 victims of violent crime (1% of all victims of such crimes) used guns to defend
themselves.46 Another 20,000 persons each year used guns to protect property. Persons in the
business of self-protection (police officers, armed security guards) may have been included in the
survey.47 Another source of information on the use of firearms for self-defense is the National
Self-Defense Survey conducted by criminology professor Gary Kleck of Florida State University
in the spring of 1993. Citing responses from 4,978 households, Dr. Kleck estimated that handguns
had been used 2.1 million times per year for self-defense, and that all types of guns had been used
approximately 2.5 million times a year for that purpose during the 1988-1993 period.48
Why do these numbers vary by such a wide margin? Law enforcement agencies do not collect
information on the number of times civilians use firearms to defend themselves or their property
against attack. Such data have been collected in household surveys. The contradictory nature of
the available statistics may be partially explained by methodological factors. That is, these and
other criminal justice statistics reflect what is reported to have occurred, not necessarily the actual
number of times certain events occur. Victims and offenders are sometimes reluctant to be candid
with researchers. So, the number of incidents can only be estimated, making it difficult to state
with certainty the accuracy of statistics such as the number of times firearms are used in selfdefense.
For this and other reasons, criminal justice statistics often vary when different
methodologies are applied.


Table 4. Brady Background Checks for Firearms Transfers and Permits
1998-2009

year total denials
2009 10,764,237 150,013
Total 95,105,025 1,613,953

Reasons for denial are kind of interesting; but you'll have to get off your lazy ass and read the paper yourself.

And from the CDC:
Number of deaths for leading causes of death
Heart disease: 611,105
Cancer: 584,881
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 149,205
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 130,557
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,978
Alzheimer's disease: 84,767
Diabetes: 75,578
Influenza and Pneumonia: 56,979
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 47,112
Intentional self-harm (suicide): 41,149

You're more likely to die of the flu than a bullet.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 20, 2015 - 11:25pm PT
I read the whole thing Jrig earlier when you had it up as a PDF, then took it down.

It was a good read and shows that a lot of momey and a few laws have slowed down the gun violence. Im not sure that it even took into account the legions of officers added to cities and states or the monies for it.

It clearly shows more guns with less violence so we must be doing something right. The one thing staying about the same is the amount of mass murders.



MD 1, your a pretty sick individual to place blame on the reverend for not allowing guns in their church.


Seemingly, YOU prefer all people to be helpless victims, waiting on cops who will be ten minutes to arrive, instead of having the capacity to fend for themselves

No, we prefer people not having to live in fear like you.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 11:29pm PT
Well, that makes one of you. I'd say, considering that suicides have not reduced in number, that we're also doing something wrong.

More numbers for you.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/12/gun-violence-car-deaths-charts

Suicides form the bulk of firearm deaths in this country.
http://lostallhope.com/suicide-statistics/us-methods-suicide
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 20, 2015 - 11:33pm PT
Yep, no laws or money for suicide which does need more attention.
thebravecowboy

climber
liberated libertine
Jun 20, 2015 - 11:33pm PT
You're more likely to die of the flu than a bullet.

and so I can stop caring about a racially-driven terror attack because I am a [white] gun owner?
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 11:35pm PT
Nope. Just putting it into perspective. People like numbers. I'm offering numbers.

Frankly, I'd like to see the government go after some of our freedoms of speech too, if you're going to insist on going after our freedom of guns. Shut down the hate speech that contribute(ed/s) to the events such as this one. Could ya live with that?
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 11:39pm PT
None of us gets out alive, but we can damn sure fight for our time here. Even against heart disease and cancer. The knee-jerk reactions when a shooting occurs are somewhat understandable; but the continued irrationality of thinking that the gun banning proposals are an adequate solution without addressing contributory (often DRIVING factors) unnecessarily persecute a substantial percentage of the population.

Weird, considering the arguments that have been made in fighting against many of the changes now upheld as basic human rights represent sometimes a lesser percentage of the population than firearms owners. (Gay marriage, anyone?)
In those debates, arguments against expanding our freedoms run the gamut to include such things as protecting religious beliefs, upholding traditional family values that create the basic fabric of the nation, and general good moral standing, without which the country would surely fall into chaos ill repute.
But guns? Naw, man. Nobody should defend their right to have them when a shooting goes down. Gun nutz should just shut their traps about how much bigger their dicks are for owning one. Cause, according to a number of forum members on this site, that's what it all comes down to.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 20, 2015 - 11:43pm PT
MD 1, your a pretty sick individual to place blame on the reverend for not allowing guns in their church.

Ahh... another one calling me sick for simply citing a publicly-available, objective fact.

In this "great" nation, we've become such a bunch of pantywaists that "certain" truths just can't be cited.

That pastor had a perspective. It's shared by too many: The cops will protect us from anything bad ever happening. We've seen too many times that this perspective is head-in-sand.

ANYBODY who takes that perspective and is then victimized because they WOULD NOT take responsibility for themselves is an unnecessary victim. Better to have the capacity to at least put up a fight.

To me, it's no different from climbing a Yosemite big wall in Summer, so you decide you don't need any warm clothing. A sudden storm moves in. How DARE it? Utterly negligent, unprepared, you need rescue or die. To my mind, you should pay for your own rescue if you live. No excuse.

Now THAT's "blaming the 'victim'" and rightly so.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 20, 2015 - 11:56pm PT
Look, the shooting was clearly driven by race, by hate. I'm responding to the hate against firearms, which seems to pervade this thread, as it does in most other threads around here when guns are mentioned, to the point of nearly taking the thread off-topic to the original idea. You want to take it back on track, bring the discussion around to why this was a hate crime, the motivation leading to it, and how to cure that... man that would be great. The gun was just the tool. There is SOOOOOO much more going on that should be under discussion.
Yet, once again, here we are debating shooting sticks. That, i'm sure you'd agree, is totally. f*#king. lame.

There is undoubtedly a good deal more this country can do to cure the inequalities experienced by different races. It goes beyond that... we have race, gender, age discrimination, anti-gay (where plenty of hate crime has been committed), etc etc etc. What makes you think I'm not in support of solving racial (or other types of) discrimination here? Because I own a gun?
crankster

Trad climber
Jun 21, 2015 - 08:11am PT
"Knee-jerk" reactions, jig? Seems to me people are just throwing out the idea that the availability of guns needs to be discussed and debated, given that they are used to murder people on a daily basis and are the weapon of choice for mass murderers. I'd suggest that the knee-jerk reaction comes from the gun lobby and their minions. Any mention of gun control of any kind and the predictable push back arguments are launched (government takeover, Jade Helm, no more bullets because Obama and Holder are massing them,....).

I'd bet you have guns enough for several lifetimes. Got a couple myself. Plunk some cans, sure. Don't mind a 10 round reload in CA, not concerned. I interpret the 2nd amendment differently, I wasn't around with the founders, nor were you. We have an army I don't need a militia, especially an unregulated one.

You're right about the racial hatred that drove this massacre. That should be our focus. Taking that confederate flag down with by a good start, even if it is symbolic. This nutjob was radicalized by a far right culture that exaggerates black on white crime, a mindset that creeps into mainstream media.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 21, 2015 - 08:19am PT
Don't you think?
That if a single black person had a gun at that church, and killed that White Boy after he started his killing spree, The cops would have come in and shot the black person Dead, and then blamed it on him.

Blacks do not have the same rights as the Privileged White when it comes to guns, and little else.

I didn't make this up, Mark Thompson from MIP exposed this hypocrisy, which is true from their view point.

V
Cragman
prove me wrong
rather than just adding a ultra lame snide remark
It's called debating
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 21, 2015 - 08:36am PT
Fact is probably a bit strong don't you think. A very highly likely outcome nonetheless.

Where was Zimmerman when he could have done some good. Oops, he may have shot the black people too, in a new twist we'll call mutual self-defending?


EDIT: Looks like the rug was pulled out from under me. Somebody said "fact".

johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 21, 2015 - 08:59am PT
So MD, everyone should carry a gun at all times out of a fear. Sounds like an inane way to live.

BTW, I read your post about the one time you brandished your gun for nothing more than a percieved threat. Had they been armed you likely wouldn't be here. You didn't prevent an escalation, you had nothing to justify what you did except for your fear.

Blaming the pastor with a parallel of weather to guns lacks a retort.
CA.Timothy

climber
California
Jun 21, 2015 - 08:59am PT
interesting Op-Ed

Does race shape America's passion for guns?




http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/10/us/guns-race/index.html

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 21, 2015 - 09:12am PT
Some of the conservative fear of Blacks come from a little known historical event.

The Haitian Revolution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitian_Revolution

When the Black slaves revolted, got weapons and killed almost white person in the Country.

Of course it could never happen again, but to have mind numming fear of the impossible is spoon fed to the conservatives to keep up the gun sales.

1791 slave rebellion
Enlightened writer Guillaume Raynal attacked slavery in the 1780 edition of his history of European colonization. He also predicted a general slave revolt in the colonies, saying that there were signs of "the impending storm".[38] One such sign was the action of the French revolutionary government to grant citizenship to wealthy free people of color in May 1791. Because white plantation owners refused to comply with this decision, within two months isolated fighting broke out between the former slaves and the whites. This added to the tense climate between slaves and grands blancs.[39]

Raynal's prediction came true on the night of 21 August 1791, when the slaves of Saint Domingue rose in revolt and plunged the colony into civil war. The signal to begin the revolt was given by Dutty Boukman, a high priest of vodou and leader of the Maroon slaves, during a religious ceremony at Bois Caïman on the night of 14 August.[40] Within the next ten days, slaves had taken control of the entire Northern Province in an unprecedented slave revolt. Whites kept control of only a few isolated, fortified camps. The slaves sought revenge on their masters through "pillage, rape, torture, mutilation, and death".[41] Because the plantation owners had long feared such a revolt, they were well armed and prepared to defend themselves. Nonetheless, within weeks, the number of slaves who joined the revolt reached some 100,000. Within the next two months, as the violence escalated, the slaves killed 4,000 whites and burned or destroyed 180 sugar plantations and hundreds of coffee and indigo plantations.[41]
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 21, 2015 - 09:21am PT
johnboy, you weren't there at MB's incident. You're making every bit the same kind of assumption that other people are speculating on regarding "what they would have done" in the situation that occurred with this shooting.

That kind of sh#t needs to stop.

"What I would have done..."
"You're wrong about the situation in which you were involved. Here's what really happened..."

Give me a f*#king break. It's speculation. It adds nothing to the discussion.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 21, 2015 - 09:37am PT
crankster

Trad climber

Jun 21, 2015 - 08:11am PT
"Knee-jerk" reactions, jig? Seems to me people are just throwing out the idea that the availability of guns needs to be discussed and debated, given that they are used to murder people on a daily basis and are the weapon of choice for mass murderers. I'd suggest that the knee-jerk reaction comes from the gun lobby and their minions. Any mention of gun control of any kind and the predictable push back arguments are launched (government takeover, Jade Helm, no more bullets because Obama and Holder are massing them,....).

Yes, knee-jerk reactions. Guilty on both sides of the argument. As to how many guns I have, and how many I need, that's subjective, isn't it? Mass murders have been effectively carried out with traditional hunting rifles, bolt action and such, one round at a time. I keep bringing up the DC sniper in these discussions, and people keep glossing it over. That brings up the question of what's a reasonable limitation on firearm and ammunition availability.
Hi-cap mags and semi-autos are a relatively more recent development. Considering their effectiveness and popularity among those bent on mass murder, it probably warrants discussion and analysis about how to limit their availability to the general public, as well as whether it's a legitimate and effective strategy to reduce mass shootings.

Given, however, the already wide-spread distribution of such firearms, ammo, and magazines, it's going to be a very long time before any sort of passive regulation against this weaponry has any chance of effectively reducing their availability to those who wish to kill. So while you're at it, maybe you could throw a few proposals out there that would help reduce suicide, poverty, racial tension, racial inequality, and drug abuse; because all of them seem to play a huge role in what we consider to be mass murder.

Anyhow, I'm tired of participating in this discussion. Chew, spew, rinse, repeat.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 21, 2015 - 10:35am PT
My perception of what he actually wrote. He expressed his fear of three of them sitting there. He brandished his gun to prevent what he thought might happen (fear). No speculation there.

His blaming anyone without a gun at all times to fend off an incident is just an extention of his fear.

I don't understand all the fear considering that all the data you you put up indicating how unlikely it is to ever happen.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 21, 2015 - 10:44am PT
The DC sniper killings happened over a long period of time. He didnt just walk in and start mowing people over. So your right in respect to the gun used, but that was rare and I don't see many trying to take humting rifles away.

Now if that changes to being a regular happening then we might start seeing a push back on humting rifles too. There is a reason why most mass murders choice of weapons is a semiauto.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 21, 2015 - 10:49am PT
The Rev had nothing to do with no guns in church, it's a SC state law.

For what it's worth every mass shooting since 1950 with only two exceptions happened in a "gun free zone".

The predators that perpetrate these acts seek out places where they will not face the possibility of an armed defender.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 21, 2015 - 11:15am PT
This article doesn't agree with your assertion about gun free zones.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/mass-shootings-map

Edit, I don't know if this site is bias one way or the other.
pud

climber
Sportbikeville & Yucca brevifolia
Jun 21, 2015 - 11:19am PT
The Rev had nothing to do with no guns in church, it's a SC state law.

For what it's worth every mass shooting since 1950 with only two exceptions happened in a "gun free zone".

The predators that perpetrate these acts seek out places where they will not face the possibility of an armed defender.

TGT, logic only works for the logical.
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 21, 2015 - 01:09pm PT
Huckabee won't be 'baited' into Confederate flag debate, says it's not a ‘presidential’ issue
TradEddie

Trad climber
Philadelphia, PA
Jun 21, 2015 - 01:50pm PT
All other countries have constitutions that presume that governments grant rights, and thus that governments can take them away. Our government was designed in unique fashion, whereby the definition of tyranny was built in: ANY government that fails to uphold and protect inalienable rights is tyrannical, regardless of how "benevolent" it might appear to any particular subset of the governed

Why would anyone trust your opinion or interpretation of vague principles when you can't even accurately post simple facts?

While possibly unique and certainly revolutionary in the 1780's, to say that no other country constitutionally recognizes inalienable rights or a duty to protect them is laughably inaccurate.

By your definition of tyranny, can you provide a single example in the entire history of mankind where a society of more than ten thousand people was governed without tyranny? It certainly wasn't the original United States which explicitly refused to protect the inalienable rights of slaves, nor the United States that to this day asserts the right to forcibly draft its citizens into military service.

TE
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 21, 2015 - 02:34pm PT
So the solution to all of these massacres is for people to grab more guns?

What a sick, pathetic excuse for logic.

For whatever it's worth, I've stated many times that I'm not unacquainted with firearms and happen to be a pretty good shot. That said, I would strongly resist any movement to make carrying firearms in public legal in my nation and, since your weapons have a habit of crossing the border, in the U.S. as well.

The ENTIRE PLANET is royally pissed off with the United States for yet another mass murder of innocents committed by yet another piece of white trash with an easily obtainable firearm.

Mass shootings are not completely unheard of in other advanced industrialized democracies, as detailed in the American Bar Association web site, but with nowhere even close to the same frequency as the U.S.

I repeat: there is something evil about the obscene love affair far too many gun owners have with their personal death machines, and it is far beyond time for true U.S. patriots to seek measures to cure this cancer that is destroying the nation.

I repeat again: It is time for citizens to pay infinitely less attention to the "rights" of people to pack firearms in public, and ensure that the rights of human beings not to get shot is enshrined in the Bill of Rights.

Unfortunately, scientists are still searching in vain for a cure for wilful pig-ignorance.

Make love, not war.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 21, 2015 - 02:53pm PT
^^^
Not really, just opinionated.

I repeat: it's time to put more emphasis on curing the social ills that lead to violent crime committed with any weapon.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 21, 2015 - 03:39pm PT
johnnyrig: I actually agree with you - I don't think it's a coincidence that these horrors are seldom directly perpetrated by billionaires.

The war on drugs has cost the U.S. at least a trillion dollars and has resulted in little more than the destruction of the lives of millions of otherwise harmless U.S. citizens. That trillion dollars would have been more intelligently spent on prevention and treatment programs instead of filling up prisons.

Poverty is at the root of much crime, and instead of spending billions upon billions of dollars to build yet more prisons plus hiring people to guard non-violent offenders, those dollars could be spent more humanely to provide social services for the needy.

I don't have the least doubt that these measures, if implemented, would result in a spectacular drop in the U.S. crime rate.
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Jun 21, 2015 - 03:45pm PT
A thread from Nov. 2013, way back for some, and like yesterday for others :scroll back to the first post . . .
the title read -


OT: Next Confederate Flag I see = Free trip to Hospital



http://www.supertopo.com/climbing/thread.php?topic_id=2266139&tn=60



What I never understand, is why these threads thrive and then spontaneously combust.?
seems like ?

http://www.supertopo.com/climbing/thread.php?topic_id=2266139&msg=2269178#msg2269178
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 21, 2015 - 03:53pm PT

Make love, not war.

Funny, your post sounds like a scream for vengeance. A scream for obliterating more rights. A scream of hate. And a scream for war! Are you some kind of new political judge and jury that only you know how to cure man's ills? Maybe take a little time out and reflect on your meaning of Make love, not war.

If you need some good examples I suggest looking into what the kin of those who were murdered in cold blood has said to the face of this cold killer. Its in the news, but barely. Go witness what a Christian does in the face of his enemy, and be prepared for lesson son. You weren't even involved and YOU want to dictate laws that govern THEIR future? The huevos on you. Tiny
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 21, 2015 - 04:00pm PT
Stewart, i agree.

Blue- the lessons i've had from good Christian folk is that a damn good healthy percentage of them aren't nearly as tolerant, peaceful, or open minded as they like to claim.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 21, 2015 - 04:06pm PT

That trillion dollars would have been more intelligently spent on prevention and treatment programs instead of filling up prisons.

Now YOU have better intelligence than our entire government on how it should spend OUR money? YOUR idea is for the government to spend trillions on teaching us how to behave?? Maybe that's what YOUR government does and it seems to have been a waste of money. If you learn anything today, learn this: GOVERNMENTS ARE NOT PUT IN PLACE TO DICTATE OR SWAY THE BEHAVIORS OF SOCIETY.

Ours is The Land of The Free! Learn it! And fear it if you must.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 21, 2015 - 04:09pm PT
Sorry to hear that Johnny! You should come over and party with us :D
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 21, 2015 - 04:56pm PT
Go witness what a Christian does in the face of his enemy

A good Christian would be armed and ready to snuff his enemies out, or so were told.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 21, 2015 - 05:08pm PT
Go witness what a Christian does in the face of his enemy

he butchers his enemy

ever heard about The Crusades?
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 21, 2015 - 06:03pm PT
BLUEBLOCKR: Damn right I'm seeking vengeance - I'm seeking vengeance for the victims of your "right" to murder them.

If you want to delude yourself that you're some kind of a hero, perhaps you could become a fireman or a paramedic - those people put their lives on the line to keep people alive, and they can go to sleep at night secure in the knowledge that they're not gleeful supporters of a culture of murder.

The whole world is watching, and human beings all over the planet are sickened by your infantile paranoia.

Take a look in the mirror. You are a cancer upon the soul your nation.

Oh, and when you've got the time, check out the Sermon on the Mount. There isn't a single word that Christ said that has a single thing in common with the beliefs of sparrowfarts like you and your ilk.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 21, 2015 - 06:30pm PT

has a single thing in common with the beliefs of sparrowfarts like you and your ilk.

PLEASE son, you've just proven you don't even have the comprehension to understand what I wrote. A person would have to be a fool to take any direction from you regarding the bible.
Now go back to your bedroom and continue sucking on your bong %d
Norton

Social climber
Jun 21, 2015 - 06:47pm PT
Blu, the Bible was written not to be taken literally.

nonsense

Blu has stated that the bible is the direct word of god, all of it, and not written by humans

every enslaving, murdering word of it, direct from god as instructions for us
WBraun

climber
Jun 21, 2015 - 06:49pm PT
You Americans are too damn stupid to do anything right.

Take all the guns away and you morons will still find a way to kill each other in different way.

Your whole country is rooted in violence.

You eat nothing but violence.

You're too stupid to see all the violence you commit against nature and the rest of the world.

You're Karma is so full of violence it's unbelievable.

Stooopid Americans ....
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 21, 2015 - 07:03pm PT
Hey norton
I've heard one doesn't even have to be a Christian to understand the value of telling the truth. You know honor, and all that other stuff. So what I was wondering was, what's the feeling you get when go to the extent of thinking up and actually spending some of your last tiered movements you have left here on this wonderful planet writing what you know to be outright lies promoting YOUR hate toward another person?

Jus Wonder'in
Sleep Well ; )
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 21, 2015 - 07:15pm PT
BLUEBLOCKR: So what did I get wrong about the Sermon on the Mount?

I guess Jesus actually meant that it's OK for white trash to unload on unarmed citizens because it's their "right" to have the highest gun murder rate in the world (by a country mile among advanced democratic industrialized nations)?

Oh, and about my earlier posts and your pathetic responses... uh...

pearls before swine.

By the way, the rest of planet Earth is also disgusted with your spewage (hey! I just coined a word!) of this murderous crap, so I'm far from alone.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 21, 2015 - 07:28pm PT
QITNL^^^ well you can be certain I've tried my best, but there's just to much : (

Mostly I'm drawn by mistakes like the you just posted. If you believe the kkk are Christian and are representative of Jesus, then I would tell you to your face your absolutely WRONG. if your just sling'in hateful arrows ill just stop there. But if you wanted to debate at a mature level I'd show you truthful reason as why the kkk are NOT followers of Christ.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 21, 2015 - 07:47pm PT

I guess Jesus actually meant that it's OK

I said nothing nowhere near that. In a nutshell a Christian knows God will have vengeance. And a good visual sign of a Christian is what he does when he is wronged. That's why I pointed at what the relatives of the victims did the day after their loved ones where murdered. They went face to face with the perp and forgave him. This reaction flies in the face of the human animal. And it does not work in any of man's governmental establishments.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 21, 2015 - 08:03pm PT

No... wait...

Still not quite adequate...

yeah. now we're gettin' close...
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 21, 2015 - 08:05pm PT
You know language like that is easy to decipher which spirit is doin the prompting. Would you like a few verses? When people go to those extremes they become blinded by thinking they are fighting a war for God. In their delusion they start pulling out all sorts of Old Testament laws. But as a Christ follower, our only fight is with the prince of lies.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 21, 2015 - 08:20pm PT
BLUEBLOCKR: Out of all the human beings on planet earth, God has appointed you as his spokesman...

Nice work if you can get it, eh?

Do you have to buy your own assault rifle, or does it come with the job?
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 21, 2015 - 08:32pm PT
No worries. Soon as you revert to twisting words it's apparent who's twisting your intellect. Just please pray for control over your own mind : )
pud

climber
Sportbikeville & Yucca brevifolia
Jun 21, 2015 - 08:38pm PT
Your opening quote gives a clear view into your twisted psyche.
this cancerous love affair so many citizens of the U.S. have with firearms.
Law abiding citizens with guns are not the problem.
Fanatics are.
Tim Mcveigh didn't need a firearm to obliterate 168 souls and wound hundreds of others. Better laws were created to regulate ammonium nitrate because of tim, but no one wanted to outlaw explosives.
A lunatic killed 3 and wounded 30 with his car and a knife yesterday in Austria. Are you going to blame the car and knife?

If you think for a moment this type of thing hasn't happened throughout human history you naive, and that's putting it nicely.
The big difference was that it wasn't broadcast immediately to the entire world as it is today.
Lunatics and fanatics abound. Disarming yourself may not be the best way to deal with them.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 21, 2015 - 08:42pm PT
BB, a lot of people here that think ISIS are followers of Islam?

Personally, I don't believe KKK's are anymore christian than ISIS are Islamic.
MisterE

Gym climber
Being In Sierra Happy Of Place
Jun 21, 2015 - 08:44pm PT
MORE FACEPALM!

You're Karma is so full of violence it's unbelievable.

Stooopid Americans ....

My Karma recently ran over my Snoop Doggma

so I should be OK now, right?
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 21, 2015 - 09:09pm PT
I got an akarmabotomy on sale before the rush hits.
Apparently all Americans will need one soon.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 21, 2015 - 09:28pm PT
Yeah Johnboy. It's plain to see that the prince of lies roams freely over every sector in this world. Just like the bible warns. We all see it everyday all around us how lies corrupt minds. Just like we saw in this young kid murdering 9 innocent people. Just through the writings and the pictures he posted its easy for anyone to tell he all kinds of truths twisted about. One thing i find pertinent was he wasn't some down and out kid. From the pics you can see he lived in a very nice home. Where were the parents in all this?

Is it the structure of our modern family that breeds these lone suicidle terrorist?
10b4me

Social climber
Jun 21, 2015 - 09:31pm PT

well for all those seemingly hating whites and cops, this is your day- a black perp shot and killed a Louisiana police officer who was white. I guess that's a double bonus for some of you , a cop and white..Here

The cop was black.
son of stan

Boulder climber
San Jose CA
Jun 21, 2015 - 10:47pm PT
So do I.
The Vatican city dope connection appears to be solid if one
can judge by their recent advice.

And from people protected by a heavily armed security force.
Whats good for them is not good for the rest of us? Confusing.



BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 21, 2015 - 11:10pm PT

"Pope says weapons manufacturers can't call themselves Christian"

See this what I'm Say'in bout twisted truths. The pope didnt say that^^^.

What the pope said was; " businessmen who call themselves Christian and they manufacture weapons. That leads to a bit a distrust, doesn't it?" he said to applause.

Even right there he's being a little judgmental. Reuters is the one with the twisted headline. and that causes people like moose to talk under that lie.

Shame on Reuters.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 21, 2015 - 11:19pm PT
Moosedrool: Careful... BLUEBLOCKR had been kind enough to inform us that he alone has been anointed by God himself to do such things as interpret what the Sermon on the Mount is really about, although when asked to enlighten us lesser mortals as to its true meaning he has so far declined to respond.

He has also been too busy to offer a single syllable of sympathy to the surviving victims of the white trash who murdered so many of the members of the Charleston church congregation... not a single word of condolence to fellow Christians, probably because their faith in Jesus is so strong that they actually believe that He wants them to forgive the fanatic who destroyed so many innocent lives that day.

He and his buddies figure that it was partly the fault of these people that they died, since the parishioners weren't packing guns with them that day.

On the other hand, not only he has not expressed a single word of criticism towards the aforementioned white trash who did all the shooting, he offers one line platitudes in rejection of established facts about the evils of U.S. gun culture.

There are many good things to say about the U.S., but these legions of hate-crazed wannabe killers who pollute the fringes of society are not one of them.

What BLUEBLOCKR HAS had time to do is whine about how the outrage against these evil acts might actually interfere with the "rights" of he and his buddies to possess (and carry in public) all the the instruments of murder that they want.

BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 21, 2015 - 11:39pm PT
haha : ( what do you write for Reuters too?

You don't even know what I did as for condolences. Why would I put anything here, you think their relatives gonna be reading the taco tonight?

If you do write for Reuters would you learn the correct spelling of my name so you could atleast get that right. Eh.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 12:01am PT
yea well gotta keep these nOObs in line right?
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 12:24am PT
Old? I'd rather say original.

Why did it take the pope 600yrs to figure out Jesus enough to start his own church? This isn't a joke.

And how are you suppose to be taken seriously when all you do is post those silly pics with a silly caption everywhere?
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 12:35am PT
Don't you find it the least bit queer that all these problems we're having in the world today are coming from all these religions formed hundreds and even thousands of years after Jesus started His church? These are churches started by men, proclaiming their interpretation of what Jesus said to be the only right one. In a word. Religions.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 01:01am PT
He expressed his fear of three of them sitting there.

Get the story straight if you're going to refer to it. They weren't "sitting there." They got up and started to come over, all the while talking gangland smack as gangbangers do. You act like I was somehow wrong to feel fear. Ridiculous! Fear is an appropriate reaction to a situation like that, and if you had experience with the Inland Empire and East LA during those years you would have a tiny clue.

He brandished his gun to prevent what he thought might happen (fear). No speculation there.

You keep saying "brandished," but your repeating it doesn't make it true.

"Brandishing" is a legal term, and a holstered gun cannot be "exhibited, pointed, waved, or displayed in a threatening manner." Merely showing that one possesses a gun is not "brandishing" in any state I am aware of, and if a holstered gun was a "brandished" gun in the legal sense, open carry (which is legal in most states) would be ongoing brandishing. California does not allow open carry, so revealing a gun to threatening gang-bangers is literally the least threatening thing you can do to show them that you do not intend to just take whatever they intend to dish out.

Get off the "brandishing" kick, as you don't have the legal sense of it right.

His blaming anyone without a gun at all times to fend off an incident is just an extention of his fear.

Tremendous irony in that statement, Johnboy! See below....

I don't understand all the fear considering that all the data you you put up indicating how unlikely it is to ever happen.

Now poor Johnboy is hung on his own petard. Oh the irony....

You're between a rock and hard place of your own making.

If incidents like Charleston very rarely happen (which is indeed correct), then all your hand-wringing about how we just "have to do something" to "stop the violence" is entirely unfounded.

On the other hand, if incidents like Charleston happen "too much" as it is, then it is indeed reasonable to do a simple thing to protect oneself from such an eventuality.

Your emphasis on "fear" is your own fabrication. In a very few cases I have felt fear and have been happy I was armed. Had you been in such situations, you also would have felt fear, but you would have had no capacity to protect yourself.

The vast majority of the time, I slip my gun in the holster in the morning and then go the whole day without thinking about it, just as you do with your wallet. In fact, you have to deal with your wallet far more than I have to deal with my gun. I don't "worry" or live in fear, yet I know that should a situation arise that is threatening and would cause any normal person to feel fear, at least I have a fighting chance.

Neither I nor any other gun carrier I know feels like a superman. We are well aware of the fact that there are countless tactical issues that can work against us. All a gun does is give a person a fighting chance in bad situations. You don't have to live a life of fear to appreciate having a better chance than an unarmed person in such a situation.

Now, regarding the pastor....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/pastor-and-state-senator-remembered-for-preaching-calls-for-justice/2015/06/18/793c0162-15cc-11e5-89f3-61410da94eb1_story.html

He was both a pastor and a state senator, just as I said.

Furthermore, he had recently voted against a bill to expand concealed carry, even though that one was ultimately signed into law: S.308. The voting archives for bill H.3025 are not available, but that bill would have removed the statewide prohibition on concealed carry in churches. Given Pinckney's anti-gun voting record, it seems almost certain that he voted against H.3025 when it recently came before the state senate.

http://www.sgberman.com/2015/06/18/the-senseless-death-in-a-charleston-church-could-have-been-prevented/

Don't again pop off with the stupidity that I'm "blaming the victims." That's just flat ridiculous. I blame the young sicko whose name I won't even state. He is responsible for the violence and death.

That said, a great part of the tragedy is that the churchgoers were disallowed from legally having any capacity to defend themselves, and that lack of capacity is wrong! Pinckney had a strong anti-gun stance, and his anti-gun efforts did in fact help ensure that his flock would be unarmed, helpless victims. And that is both ironic and doubly tragic!

There simply are no gun free zones. Criminals abide by no such zones, and, if anything, they seek them out to ensure maximum access to soft targets before armed good guys can get to the scene. The zones are "gun free" only until they become a desirable target for some sicko, and then the sicko is the only one with a gun.

So, until you can ENSURE that criminals don't have guns (no way you can do that), you'll just have to accept that some of us take seriously the right to self-defense and will not wait helplessly for the cops to arrive far too late. It's not "living in fear" to invest the incredibly minimal effort to be able to have a fighting chance. I wish that the churchgoers in Charleston HAD had a genuine fighting chance.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 01:24am PT

They'd eat you for breakfast.

Prolly not if I tasted like bacon, Eh? I guess your social justice has everything to do about laws? Maybe kinda like how the pope is trying to direct political law now??
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 01:38am PT
and you don't seem to understand 1 law, or 600? A law is a law.

Maybe try reading Romans. Is that in your bible?
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 01:51am PT
My bacon reference had nothing to do with Jews. I am grafted.
It was an easy example of social justice through law.
Did you read any of the NEW Testament in those 12yrs, or were you to busy getting spanked? That's not an insult, it's a question.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 02:02am PT

Nine African-Americans were shot dead in their church. You trying to make a funny?

I don't think anything on this thread is funny. Sad actually. I e only tried to point at the surviving loved ones of the deceased have mostly if not all, gone in front of the perp and have forgiven him. THAT'S WHAT SHOULD BE CELEBRATED EVERYWHERE! These are followers of Christ!
But all the law abiding citizens only see revenge..
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 02:13am PT
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 02:16am PT
The US government will punish his body. And God will deal with his soul.
Maybe a life in jail will bring awareness of what forgiveness entails? To receive it one must aquire the truth in his mind, and expose his heart to remorse. Then repent to The Lord for his soul to be saved.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 02:20am PT

Does that answer your question?

No. The guy at Boeing can design a plane, but he don't know how to fly
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 02:47am PT
Jeez dude your the insult queen. Not one of mine was an insult but a pointing at realties truth.
Seriously man, I would much rather talk about what it is to be a Christian. It seems easiest when there's examples to point at. You've only mentioned how smart you are : ( that's cool I prolly wish that I memorized as many words of the bible as you have? But wouldn't you agree it's their meaning that's what's important?
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 22, 2015 - 05:00am PT
Funny how the most insulting posters are frequently also the most easily offended.

Drama queens.

Amusing in small doses.

Studly

Trad climber
WA
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:08am PT
seriously qitnl? Did you have coco puffs for breakfast?
Rockies Obscure

Trad climber
rockiesobscure.com....Canada
Jun 22, 2015 - 08:04am PT
How is the KKK not considered a terrorist organization? Cause its born and bred American tradition in some parts?

And what up with killer dude's Macaulay Culkin hair?!
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 22, 2015 - 08:41am PT
Dylann Roof considers himself Devout a Conservative Christian
and I believe him

Most of the registered hate groups in America are associated with Christianity



Active U.S. Hate Groups



The Southern Poverty Law Center counted 784 active hate groups in the United States in 2014. Only organizations and their chapters known to be active during 2014 are included.

All hate groups have beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics.

This list was compiled using hate group publications and websites, citizen and law enforcement reports, field sources and news reports.

Hate group activities can include criminal acts, marches, rallies, speeches, meetings, leafleting or publishing. Websites appearing to be merely the work of a single individual, rather than the publication of a group, are not included in this list. Listing here does not imply a group advocates or engages in violence or other criminal activity.
http://www.splcenter.org/hate-map
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 22, 2015 - 08:45am PT
Good.

That means he's going to hell.

Hell's only for believers.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 22, 2015 - 09:00am PT
Currently, there are 784 known hate groups operating across the country, including neo-Nazis, Klansmen, white nationalists, neo-Confederates, racist skinheads, black separatists, border vigilantes and others.

Since 2000, the number of hate groups has increased by 30 percent. This surge has been fueled by anger and fear over the nation’s ailing economy, an influx of non-white immigrants, and the diminishing white majority, as symbolized by the election of the nation’s first African-American president.

These factors also are feeding a powerful resurgence of the antigovernment “Patriot” movement, which in the 1990s led to a string of domestic terrorist plots, including the Oklahoma City bombing. The number of Patriot groups, including armed militias, skyrocketed following the election of President Obama in 2008 – rising 813 percent, from 149 groups in 2008 to an all-time high of 1,360 in 2012. The number fell to 874 in 2014.

This growth in extremism has been aided by mainstream media figures (Fox News) and politicians (Republican) who have used their platforms to legitimize false propaganda about immigrants and other minorities and spread the kind of paranoid conspiracy theories on which militia groups thrive.

http://www.splcenter.org/what-we-do/hate-and-extremism
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 22, 2015 - 09:26am PT
Sketch, thanks for the explicit count of Christian Hate Groups

But of course that doesn't include the Hate Groups that weren't called Christian, but their members were still devout Christian Conservatives

I guess their God must on their side, and Hate is just as good as greed, torture, lynching, terrorism and letting people suffer for spite.

The Confederacy was a Terrorist Nation, trading humans for slavery or sex, the plantations were concentration camps with the constant cries of torture and rape, and gangs of terrorists would roam the streets looking for blacks to terrorize into either submission or a lynching.

Not only that, But they were traitors to America, and should have been dealt as such.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 22, 2015 - 09:39am PT
I would love to hear one of the "Christians" take on my question...

Nine people MURDERED in the "HOUSE OF GOD"...

That's a tough one. I doubt there's a good answer.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 09:58am PT
God's not in the business of saving people.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 22, 2015 - 09:59am PT
Regarding mass shootings:

Among developed nations, using per capita statistics, US comes in 6th behind Norway (an aberration due to the terrible events of 2011,) Finland (the real #1,) Slovakia, Switzerland and Israel. Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, UK, Canada and France round out the top twelve. Last I checked these are all developed nations, and other than U.S., these are all countries with very restrictive gun laws. Terrorist incidents such as Charlie Hebdo, or those in Israel are not counted.

This list comes from The Rampage Shooting Index, based on stats gathered by the OECD covering 2009-2013. Another truncated list can be found on Politico, "Still, the U.S. doesn’t rank No. 1. At 0.15 mass shooting fatalities per 100,000 people, the U.S. had a lower rate than Norway (1.3 per 100,000), Finland (0.34 per 100,000) and Switzerland (1.7 per 100,000)." 2000-2014. Again the Norway stat comes from a single incident.

Thus, a very strong argument can be made that additional gun laws will not make a difference. Those who think they will are barking up the wrong tree.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 22, 2015 - 10:07am PT
One incident.

My point there is that we should disregard the Norway number. Finland is, as I say, the real #1.
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
Jun 22, 2015 - 10:12am PT
Dylann Roof considers himself Devout a Conservative Christian
and I believe him

Anyone else heard this or have a link? I haven't seen anything to suggest that Roof considered himself to be Christian, devout, conservative, or otherwise.
Not that it's particularly important one way or the other, but I have a suspicion that Fry's just making up crap again. (If I'm wrong, I'll apologize, but I've followed the news coverage and haven't heard anything about Christianity being a part of this tragedy other than that the victims were Christians.)
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 22, 2015 - 10:15am PT
The answer is
"God was no where to be found, and he obviously does not answer prayers"

I laugh when I hear people say: "I prayed for my family and Through the grace of God, I was saved from the flood"
that took my house and killed my neighbors

Why didn't God just not flood the area??
What about the prayers of your neighbor that was killed, did God forget to listen, or where they just bad people and deserved to die
PAUL SOUZA

Trad climber
Central Valley, CA
Jun 22, 2015 - 10:17am PT
Instead of talking about gun control, why aren't we talking about violence?

Regardless of the weapon of choice, there is still the desire to murder and terrorize. Timothy McVeigh used a bomb, others (just recently too) use cars to mow down large crowds of people, others send letters with anthrax, and some people will just use their hands and strangle someone to death or just simply use a pillow.

So, what underlies this desire to murder and terrorize? Hopelessness? Powerlessness?

That's the issue.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 22, 2015 - 10:18am PT
blah blah
why don't you just Google it rather than cast false accusations

like I did


Dylann Roof pastor: ‘He is a devout Christian baptized as a Lutheran’

Read more: http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2015/06/dylann-roof-pastor-christian-baptized-lutheran/#ixzz3doSiKk5Z
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
Jun 22, 2015 - 10:46am PT
Fry, if that's the best you can do, I stand by my post.
You wrote that Roof "Roof considers himself Devout a Conservative Christian."
Nothing in your link says what Roof considers himself to be. Remember he wrote a "manifesto" regarding his beliefs--anything about Christianity in there?
Can you post a credible link evidencing what Roof considers himself to be?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 22, 2015 - 10:46am PT
So, what underlies this desire to murder and terrorize? Hopelessness? Powerlessness?

That's the issue.

Agree, Paul, but that doesn't further our existing agendas. As I pointed out earlier, the two biggest mass murders that I recall, Oklahoma City and 9/11, involved no gun violence.

John
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 22, 2015 - 10:55am PT
I would love to hear one of the "Christians" take on my question...

Nine people MURDERED in the "HOUSE OF GOD"...

That's a tough one. I doubt there's a good answer.

My asnwer is that Jesus said safety or protection from murder would happen. The New Testament warns continually that Christians will face persecution, mistreatment and death. It also contains plenty of warnings that some of the perpetrators will purport to be part of the church.

Thus, in a sense, the wisecrack about God not being in the business of saving people has a grain of truth: God never said Christians would have an easy time in this life. Those whose purported "Christianity" denies the Resurrection or eternal life and say that being a "good person" guarantees good circumstances in this life don't get those ideas from the Bible.

God promises to save those who believe in Jesus from the eternal penalty for sin, but not from its consequences. And while he did not guaranty good circumstances, but the opposite (". . . in the world you have tribulation"), He also provides contentment regardless of circumstances.

The trusting, faithful reaction of the members of "Mother Emmanuel" stands in marked contrast to the frenzied dogmatic response of the unbelievers.

John
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 22, 2015 - 10:59am PT
You're right. We need less guns. The only way to achieve that is through more laws.

We are not enforcing the laws already on the books. Illegal transactions are happening all the time. How our latest maniac got his gun had to be illegal.

I'm with you on registration. In CA it's the law, and it is not an impediment to any law abiding person who wants to buy a gun. Same with background checks.

Remember the Wash. D.C. sniper? Allegedly he shoplifted the gun from a dealer in Tacoma. But the dealer had no records on over 200 guns which had gone through his store including Malvo's. He lost his licence. Then he had the balls to appeal the decision. For letting 200+ guns get into circulation without a trace, no more licence. That's all. He should have gotten serious jail time.

Today he manages a shooting range in the same building!!

Enforce the laws we have. Punish the f**ks who violate gun laws harshly enough, and publicize these cases. A whole lot fewer guns will get into circulation. Parents who let their kids get guns, no matter how, should be accomplices in whatever god-awful scenario results.

What's with the 20 year limit to ownership?
jstan

climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 11:00am PT
the frenzied dogmatic response of the unbelievers.

We take note and remember the frenzied reaction and completely miss other responses. It is a natural bias one must allow for.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 11:00am PT
So, what underlies this desire to murder and terrorize? Hopelessness? Powerlessness?

I think Paul has it right, hopelessness and feeling powerless

both of which are highly unlikely to be either eradicated or even mitigated


so, we are back to square one: It continues, and yes, it IS the "price we pay for a free
and openly armed country"

no we can't really do anything about it on a Federal level, although some cities like
New York and some states like Massachusetts have both the toughest gun control laws
and also some of the fewest gun deaths per capital

VERY restrictive gun laws DO "work", in some places

Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 22, 2015 - 11:04am PT
My brother lives just outside Boston. He teaches tactical shooting and has a concealed carry permit. He had to jump through some hoops, but he has no problem with MA gun laws.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 22, 2015 - 11:10am PT
Oops! Locker, your (accurate) quote of me shows I made grammatical errors. I should have said "Jesus said murder and mistreatment would happen, and following Him would not guaranty protection from mistreatment, but rather the opposite."

As for quoting a book written by a "MAN" [sic], I agree that humans wrote the Bible, but I also believe in the orthodox doctrine that God inspired the writers. The Armenian word for the Bible translates to "The Breath of God." My personal experience is that I could not, and did not, believe the Bible of my own accord. The Holy Spirit provides the necessary and sufficient condition for belief.

In simpler terms, we seem fundamentally to disagree. I'm OK with that. I still value your opinions and (internet) friendship. If I only associated with those in agreement with me, I'd be awfully lonely.

John
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 22, 2015 - 11:21am PT
What's with the 20 year limit to ownership?

Sorry about being unclear.

My point was that the law would remain in tact for 20 years.
dave729

Trad climber
Western America
Jun 22, 2015 - 11:25am PT
If I may usurp the phase, 'you people are so stupid'. Guns are not the
problem. What is the problem is in peoples minds. The mentally ill are

being driven to ruin by powerful drugs, combined with the ceaseless drum
beat of Breaking News that endlessly shouts doom and gloom, falsely
claiming humanity is the problem, blah blah blah till someone snaps and
goes on a killing spree.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 11:26am PT

We should have stayed in the trees......
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 11:29am PT

"God was no where to be found, and he obviously does not answer prayers"

And here comes another X-catholic who's memorized the words in their special bible yet they don't know who Jesus the Christ is. When the flood comes and they get scared they pray to mother Mary asking for a life raft to save their bodies and when nothing appears before their eyes they don't ask God, why have You forsaken me? And why didn't You provide for my worldly needs in my time of tribulation? No, they miss the mark of gaining a closer spiritual relationship for their eyes deceive them. A nd instead of looking inward to the HolySpirit they look at the roserybeads in their hand for answers. And alas God is not there. So they through the beads on the ground and stomp around pointing everywhere God is not.

Brothers, don't look for God in the materials of this world, focus on your heart : )
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 22, 2015 - 11:34am PT
Props to Nikki Haley.
dave729

Trad climber
Western America
Jun 22, 2015 - 11:35am PT
"By their misdeeds you shall know them."


BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 11:55am PT

Why is it that "GOD" cares more about AMERICANS than all others???...

This is your opinion.

God cares for everyone equally. The closer we become to Jesus the more He is apt to call us His Brother. The USA was found on the firm doctrine that ALL men are created equal. Where else do you see THAT flag waving in the world? The US has been blessed by God because we have trampled down the inequalities that have plagued mankind. If we do not continue in this respect God will turn His back to us..
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 12:03pm PT

I agree with Dave, the media contribute to the problem.

Their's is only possible by being paid by the secular human animal who has the appetite for blood. If you didn't give'em money, they'de go away.

Take off your material glasses and look for the spiritual meaning..
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 12:09pm PT

That was just talk

First it was an idea. Then talk. And talk motivates the spirit to move the body.

We are on stage for the world to watch. It's VERY exciting times :D
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 12:16pm PT

it's about sales.

Ya got that right. And who is it that can afford these $900. pistols and $2000. rifles? It ain't the thugs in the streets. Stop buying them, they'll stop making them
Norton

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 12:24pm PT
The USA was found on the firm doctrine that ALL men are created equal.

not true

that language was put in our Constitution to protect WHITE MEN

blacks were slaves back then, hardly "equal"

and women were so "equal" they were not even allowed to vote
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 22, 2015 - 12:34pm PT
Because the NRA works hard to ensure that they are not enforced. Their lobby is focused on cutting the budget of enforcement agencies or otherwise creating roadblocks to effectiveness of current laws.

Dave I just spent some time looking through available databases, press, Required Lobby Reporting, and so forth on the NRA. I see lots of things I disagree with, a few I agree with, but nothing about lower law enforcement budgets or weakening enforcement of current law. Their lobby is focused on fighting the enactment of a number of new laws.

Examples? They have been known to try to get laws repealed, but to undermine the enforcement of existing law?

BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 12:47pm PT
Norton, There you go again. Pointing where God is not.

That doctrine WAS put in place coming from the idea. Without regard to what the human bodies were doing at the time. And once in place didnt infact open the doors of conversation to motivate the freeing of slaves and equal societal rights for women?

And the idea continues to open doors of conversation till this day. What impedes our movement are the distributors of lies.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 01:03pm PT
And once in place didnt infact open the doors of conversation to motivate the freeing of slaves and equal societal rights for women?

absolutely not, blu

the black slaves were not "freed" by anything to do with the constitution, written by
men who owned their own slaves

it took a civil war and hundreds of thousands of dead soldiers just to free the slaves

even the Scott Decision years later still regarded blacks as 3/5 of a white man to vote

and women did not get the right to vote for over 100 years later

and both of those "equalizing" moves were not by constitutional amendent
Norton

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 01:04pm PT
Do you think our founders could have snapped their fingers and turned it all around in a minute?


of course not, why would even think that ?
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 22, 2015 - 01:08pm PT
Norton, the doctrine of the Declaration of Independence and the realities of the time were not the same. Do you think our founders could have snapped their fingers and turned it all around in a minute? We have moved steadily in the right direction since those days, to a great extent because of our founding documents.

Many of the founders held slavery to be abhorrent. But they had to have the southern states in the union or they would fail. Many deals were made with the devil to get this country off the ground. We went on to be cleansed by blood of the scourge of slavery. In fits and starts, on step at a time we have arrived where we are today, a black President and a woman running to be next.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 22, 2015 - 01:19pm PT
I agree with Norton that it took the blood of hundreds of thousands of dead soldiers to free the slaves when we did, and the Constitution's use of the three-fifths formula reprented a compromise the overwhelming majority of free United States males could live with.

Those who disparage religion overlook the strong role religion played in forming the abolitionists' views both in the United States and Great Britain, but the Confederates were certain that God was on their side, too.

While I find the language of the Declaration of Independence and the basic tenets of Christian doctrine both falling squarely on the side of equality of worth and rights for all people, we tend to ignore doctrine when greed gets in the way. Mere reflection doesn't make us behave better. Sometimes it takes force. Here I agree with Kris - if we enforced the existing laws regarding distribution of firearms with the zeal we enforced, say, tax evasion, I don't think we'd need better laws.

Unfortunately, I see over and over again a desire to end bad behavior by passing laws making crime "more illegal." The few economically-focused criminological studies I've seen tend to show that the penalty for misbehavior doesn't matter unless there's a decent likelihood of getting caught and punished in the first place. In the context of Charleston, any penalty Roof faces would have been the same whether he used a gun or his bare hands, but will Roof's parents face any prosecution?

John
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 01:27pm PT
Oh, the poor, poor ATF that is legally precluded from maintaining a national gun registry. Oh, oh, oh.

Actually, if legislation to preclude the feds from maintaining a national gun registry is one of the lobbying efforts of the NRA, maybe I SHOULD join the NRA and start sending them money.

The issue of a national gun registry is one of the most divisive aspects of getting a universal background check law passed. And as long as the feds keep trying to conjoin background checks with a gun registry, you'll have vociferous opposition from millions just like me.

Decouple those and ensure by force of law that no federal agency can maintain a "registry" type database, and you'll immediately garner my full support for universal background checks.

It's simple: Try to get greedy and take too much, and you get nothing. Be reasonable and compromise on the really contentious issue, and you'll get the lion's share of what you want.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 01:49pm PT
I don't believe any amount of law curtails social behavior.
Look at china, up till 56' they only had 1 law. Now they got less than 300 but they still don't have the crazy crap we see going on in the US. We have craziness for the fact that we have freedom of imagination! Then freedom of speach. Then roll in our modern working family with no one home looking after the kids cept TV and video games and we have a boiling pot for imagination to become action.

When an immature childish brain doesn't like something he throws it down, turns it off, shoots to kill.
10b4me

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 01:55pm PT
God cares for everyone equally.

my understanding is that he really doesn't care for anyone.
Mick Ryan

Trad climber
The Peaks
Jun 22, 2015 - 02:13pm PT
Bit of a shoo-hah over at the Guardian..http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/22/guardian-view-on-confederate-flag-tear-down-this-red-rag-south-carolina-shooting-charleston

I am a 49 y.o. BLACK AMERICAN WOMAN from Dallas, Texas. Displaying the Confederate flag IS RACISM. I have a hard time believing you'd call a swastika a 'piece of cloth', but when it comes to Black people, it's ok to play everything down.

That flag symbolizes slavery. Misery. Terror. That flag reminds me of the oldest ancestor my family can remember, my great-grandmother, who was brought to TEXAS from Virginia, on a wagon train, as a lady's maid in the mid 1800s, as a child. She never saw her parents again; she was sold from them. That flag symbolizes her being F O R C E D to bear the slavemaster's children because his wife couldn't bear any. Today that would be called R A P E. Back then, she was considered property, so no rape was said to have 'occurred'.

That flag symbolizes the 2 half-white daughters she was forced to bear, and then forced to give up, so they could live as 'white'. The daughters died soon afterward; the black daughter was unwanted and became my great-grandmother, who had to raise my mother and her sister, after their mother died in 1940.

That flag symbolized vicious Jim Crow segregation, which both my parents (both past age 75) had to deal with daily; “’we don’t hire colored people here”. Segregated schools, drinking fountains, etc. Being only able to go to the State Fair one day a year – “Negro Achievement Day”. Lynch mobs. ‘Gator bait’ (look it up). Lynch ropes. A bunch of losers who are mad because they LOST!! You lost 150 years ago – GET OVER IT!

That flag symbolizes the stubborn refusal to “give us what you put down on paper” (MLK referring to the Constitution). Lots of people paid for that refusal, like President John Kennedy. In Dallas, Texas.
It’s not just cloth; it’s a racist piece of losers’ crap that needs to be left in a museum. PERIOD.

Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 22, 2015 - 02:18pm PT
BLUEBLOCR: I notice that you haven't had enough integrity to take your thumb out of your ass long enough to tell us what Jesus "really" meant in the Sermon on the Mount, since you insist that you're the only person on planet Earth who is capable of understanding this stuff.

Furthermore, I am reeling from your casual support for the 1 TRILLION dollars wasted on the "War on Drugs", not to mention the countless millions of non-violent offenders who have had their lives ruined by this sick legislation.

And I continue to swoon at your intellectually constipated inability to consider the fact that poverty directly contributes to crime rates.

Oh, madbolter: you are still one sick fukwit for claiming that it was partly the victim's fault for getting shot because they weren't packing guns. Perhaps you could take a second to consider that these were CHRISTIANS who actually understood the Sermon on the Mount...

you know the sermon with the line that says "Love thy neighbour".

Isn't it part of your Bill of Rights that guarantees the pursuit of happiness as one of your freedoms? It's a pity that the people who are endlessly baying about their "rights" to personally carry the weapons of death in public had the humanity choose the pursuit of happiness as the focus for their energies instead.

P.S.: BLUEBLOCR, you twisted fraud - are you happy that I spelled your Republican nom de plume correctly this time? Twice.

P.P.S.: great work on cooking the statistics re: gun crime all you NRA types. I'll stick with the American Bar Association for the truth, but even if I conceded the accuracy of your conflicting numbers, it would take a truly shallow human being to deny that gun violence in the U.S. is almost routine. You can't fix what's wrong with other nations, but people of good will sure can do something to repair what's happening on their own soil.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 22, 2015 - 02:52pm PT
Dave, point taken. I had no idea they were making ads like that. Stupid.

ATF should have database access. Of course these databases seem to be vulnerable. Also Government agencies are not immune from abusing private information. Caution must be taken on this.

Of course if the Government is in charge of setting up the system it'll cost a billion and wont work anyway :-)

Something like 7 out of 50 states require gun sales at shows to go through a licensed dealer, background check and so forth. CA is one of the 7. The rest should follow.

I still don't think this will do anything re the rage shootings.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 02:58pm PT
I still don't think this will do anything re the rage shootings.

what would you recommend then, if anything?
paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Jun 22, 2015 - 03:10pm PT
https://youtu.be/Jl--YVnni0I




Watch and enjoy.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 22, 2015 - 03:24pm PT
Moosedrool: You are witnessing the best of the U.S. citizenry defending America the Beautiful against a disgusting sample of the low-lifes who will do anything within their power to drag this proud nation into the darkness of an anarchistic murder-filled sewer.

Please direct your friends in Poland and elsewhere to read this thread. Once upon a time I actually tried to reason with these people by pointing out to them that the entire world is disgusted with these endless massacres taking place on U.S. soil, yet not one of these gun fanatics value the rights of individuals to safety above their "right" to possess as many murder machines as they desire.

P.S. Watch out for Rdog - he's not only exceptionally stupid, but he's a pretty good candidate for the next guy to cut loose on a crowd of innocents.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 03:28pm PT
Oh, madbolter: you are still one sick fukwit for claiming that it was partly the victim's fault for getting shot because they weren't packing guns. Perhaps you could take a second to consider that these were CHRISTIANS who actually understood the Sermon on the Mount...

More insults and name-calling. Really, dude, would you say such trash to my face?

It's really pathetic that people like you have so cast the TERMS of the "argument" that even stating the FACTS makes one a "sick fukwit."

Is it or is it not a FACT that Pinckney was a state senator?

Is it or is it not a FACT that his voting record shows his sweeping anti-gun, anti-concealed-carry stance?

Is it not a FACT that a law that would have legalized concealed carry in churches was just recently voted down by HIS own senate? (I'm confident that eventually it will come out in the voting records that he did indeed vote against it.)

Is it or is it not a FACT that the churchgoer victims were precluded BY LAW from possessing the very firearms that could have saved their lives and CERTAINLY would have given them at least a fighting chance as sicko reloaded again and again while waiting for the cops to FINALLY show up???

Look, you can massage the facts all you want, but it is FACT that Pinckney's own perspectives DID contribute to the FACT that nobody in his church could defend themselves with the best response, the response the cops themselves used: GUNS!

When somebody assembles a rap anchor wrong and then dies because of it, we don't "blame the victim" in the sense you label me with! But we DO recognize that the victims own perspectives and decisions had a direct, causal relationship to the tragedy. And that is exactly the state of affairs with Pinckney.

By denying the FACTS and labeling anybody who cites them in the most pejorative terms, you attempt to make the FACTS go away and the people that would talk about the facts too afraid to cite the obvious arguments that emerge from the facts.

I don't fall for your labels, your invective, your name-calling, or your attempts to scare me off from stating the facts that we just MIGHT learn something from, if we only had the will to face the FACTS head on.

The FACT is that if even ONE person in that church besides the sicko had a gun and the will to use it, those people would have had a fighting chance that their own government denied them. THAT is WRONG, and their own government should be held accountable for stripping them of the effective employment of their inalienable right of self-defense.

Regarding their Christianity, perhaps YOU could take a second to think about the FACT that most Christians are not pacifists, nor do they interpret the sermon on the mount as you seem to think it should be.

Look, if you think everybody should be a radical pacifist and just take what's coming to 'em, because, after all, all outcomes are God's will (or some such ridiculous nonsense), then YOU have no business wringing your hands for these people. They were not victims, and there was no tragedy! Everything played out just as God intended, if that's your view.

MOST Christians don't share such a ridiculous view, and we DO think a tragedy occurred! We ALSO think that once a sicko emerges like that, he should be put down like a mad dog as soon as the drawing of our concealed weapon will allow! And if we're killed in the effort, we would hope that our friend's draw is right alongside ours, so that HE or SHE puts the mad dog down asap while sicko is killing us. The more armed good guys you've got in such a situation, the BETTER of a fighting chance you've got.

The FACT is that MORE guns held by good guys in that church would have almost certainly reduced the victim count. Same as in the Aurora theater. Same as virtually all of the other mass shootings in supposedly "gun free zones." If Sandy Hook taught us anything, it taught us that resisting by ANY means ups your chances and saves lives! And the more effective of resistance you can muster, the more lives are saved!

WAKE UP and realize that good guys carrying guns is NOT the problem. KEEPING them from carrying guns contributes to the increased death toll.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 03:31pm PT
What do you wanna hear Stewart? You only seem to hear what you wanna hear, then try to further the conversation under your selected dichotomy.

you know the sermon with the line that says "Love thy neighbour".

What does that mean to you? Jesus didn't give it much value when He asked,"do not even the tax collectors do the same?". Do you want to be perfect as your Father in heaven? Then don't stop short.

"You have heard that it was said, you shall love your neighbor, and hate your enemy. But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you."

Now all along I have been pointing at "what the sermon on the mount means" by bringing up what the victims loved ones did in retaliation. And that is to FORGIVE THEIR ENEMY!

If this was the societal norm, hate would shrivel up and die!
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 03:35pm PT
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.

Topic Author's Reply - Jun 22, 2015 - 02:18pm PT

Isn't it part of your Bill of Rights that guarantees the pursuit of happiness as one of your freedoms? It's a pity that the people who are endlessly baying about their "rights" to personally carry the weapons of death in public had the humanity choose the pursuit of happiness as the focus for their energies instead

Actually Stewart, many of the 1/3 of the US population who own firearms pursue happiness in a variety of ways, to which firearms don't necessarily need be there at all. My wife, for example, couldn't care less if they did pass a confiscation scheme (though she admits she would miss the elk steak and chukar hunting). For you to make such a broad, sweeping, inflammatory statement reveals utter contempt and an inability to find any sort of justifiable excuse to own a firearm. Similar to any other biased point of view in which logic and reason are incapable of overcoming the individual's emotionally charged stance for or against the particular subject at hand.

In other words, the gun nutz have as much chance of convincing you they're not evil as you have of convincing them to disarm. That's no more an enlightened point of view than you're accusing them of having.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 03:36pm PT
Yet not one of these gun fanatics value the rights of individuals to safety above their "right" to possess as many murder machines as they desire.

That's amazingly ironic, coming from you!

Wow, just WOWWWWW!!!

YOU support the the sort of denial of the right of self-defense that the SC Senate foisted off on its people just prior to this very tragedy!

And then YOU actually blame the people that want to UPHOLD the victims' right of self-defense.

YOU very intentionally DISARM the victims and then decry the very people that want to ensure that they CAN exercise their RIGHT to defend themselves!

You DEMAND that they sit there helpless, while the very people that actually DO "value the rights of individuals" are the ones you attack as NOT valuing their rights!

Confusion abounds!

Between the two of us, WHO is the one that wants the victims to helplessly lack the capacity to respond in this sort of situation?

Between the two of us, WHO is the one that wants individuals to not have the capacity to actually EXERCISE their rights?

Look, this is really, really simple: If you leave me completely alone, you will have no problem with me or my gun. I'm not trying to take anything away from you. I'm not "after you" in ANY way. Just leave me alone, and I'll leave you alone. And that is the perspective of tens of millions of responsible gun carriers across the USA. It is people like YOU that are trying to take something away, and people like me are NOT like the helpless victims you seem to applaud FOR their very helplessness!!!

Quit taking away their RIGHT to self-defense!
crankster

Trad climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 03:39pm PT
Spot on, Stewart...but Ron is resurrected - this thread is headed for the deep freeze. We had a month off and the positive change to the forum was noticeable...but too good to last.

Arm the congregation!!! Arm the theater goers!! Oh man.

[Click to View YouTube Video]
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 03:51pm PT
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/07/15/the-demographics-and-politics-of-gun-owning-households/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country

http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/04/gun-ownership-by-the-numbers/
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 03:54pm PT
^^^^ Oh, the hilarious appeal to the liberal media as a "proof" of something.

All your clip shows is that Archie is not well-spoken, which was exactly why his character was set up and employed to poke fun at the "conservative" perspective.

Arm the congregation!!! Arm the theater goers!! Oh man.

Problem you've got with using such a clip in response to me is that I'm no conservative!

If people in a congregation want to be armed, who are YOU to tell them that they must instead remain helpless and unable to defend themselves?

If people in a theater want to be armed, who are YOU to tell them that they must instead remain helpless and unable to defend themselves?

If Charleston taught us anything, it taught us that when people like YOU insist that other people MUST remain helplessly unable to exercise their RIGHT of self-defense, it is such as YOU that have disarmed them and told sickos: "Here you go. Here's a nice, soft target. Here's a 'gun free zone' just waiting for you to have the only gun in the place."

If you are PROUD of the FACT that people like YOU disarmed the victims, I can only say: SHAME on you! Perhaps the day will come when YOU get to be helplessly unarmed in a similar situation, and you get to count the endless minutes until the cops finally arrive to SAVE you from your sorry, helpless self.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 22, 2015 - 03:59pm PT
crankster: you've got a point. Attempting to debate these clowns is like like trying to teach a stone monkey to fart.*

*Bernard Cornwell, I think.

Rdog: Go ahead - if I get booted for taking on the likes of you, then there truly is something deeply wrong with Supertopo. While you're whining, perhaps you can ask Chris to give you spelling lessons.

P.S.: Like it or not, the whole world IS pissed off about this.

P.P.S.: madbolter; WHAT liberal media?
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 04:00pm PT
^^^Yeah. This thread isn't about guns!

Primarily because the victims haven't made it so. Lets stick with what's important to the societal environment of each case. Please.

Gun debate wouldn't matter if we were to stay focused on the real threats.

Why don't you go pack some loads or sump'in ; )
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 04:01pm PT
Insults do not constitute debate. They are just more hatred.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 04:07pm PT
Why do you liberals want to victimize people? Why do you insist that people CAN be only helpless victims?
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 04:10pm PT
The anti-gun crowd views firearm owners as the ones insisting that the rest of the population be helpless victims.

Let's not forget this was a hate crime. The gun was the tool; but taking it away wouldn't necessarily eliminate the hate, nor the crime.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 04:46pm PT
So, what CAN be done to mitigate the likelihood of mass murder anyway?

THREAT ASSESSMENT, for starters

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a30024/mass-shooters-1014/
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 04:49pm PT
MB1 you don't have to answer my question if you don't feel like it : )

But don't you believe God is the alpha and omega, the eternal God inthat He knows all before today and tomorrow? Haven't you seen clues that He see's not only the past but also the future possibly at the same time? He has given in the bible numbers of those who will be saved and how many will be lost. To think otherwise gives no respect to His claiming to have a plan, does it? By your posts I don't think you see it this way. It's neither here nor there concerning our relationship with Jesus. Just someth'in to think about :)

It is tragic for those 9 families to loose their loved ones. It saddens us all. But in our hearts don't we know those 9 are being celebrated in heaven right now with our Heavenly Father. And how could there be more pride in our Fathers eyes than for how His children(the deceased family's) have behaved in the face of their enemy?

Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jun 22, 2015 - 04:55pm PT
what would you recommend then, if anything?

That is a very difficult question. What I do know is that responding to this event and the others with a solution that won't address the problem is about as smart as our invasion of Iraq.

Several issues do rear their ugly heads. Psychotropic drugs. Just plain old mental illness. Cultural racism? It's certainly not pervasive throughout the general population, but perhaps in small units; families, support groups, small but locally influential groups like KKK etc. But still a person has to cross a certain bridge from light to dark to sit in a church among faithful people for an hour, studying them to determine who's first etc., and then begin the act of killing.

There were a lot of red flags about this guy, and not just among his friends (useless sacks of sht who did nothing.) How about the ones on social media. That is a public arena. We've got an NSA which is watching who we call and when and they can't find the guy's facebook and website? And how many others stumbled into these sites and passed them by?

It's a slippery slope asking people to turn in neighbors and friends who they suspect are on the way to mayhem, but in cases like this I think it is incumbent on anyone in contact with a crazy to make authorities aware.



Norton

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 05:00pm PT
I jus tend to think God choose those 9 because He had trust in how they would react. And they inturn proved His love.


seriously Blu?

You really believe the great spirit in the sky picked those nine people to be slaughtered
with bullets, and this spirt chose them because he had trust in how they would react?

in what way did they die, react, that proved god's trust in them, blu?
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 05:12pm PT
I read just today that there are approximately two dozen gang related murders in San Diego each year. The article didn't specify, but most if not all, involved somebody being shot with a gun.

What's the point? When I was growing up in the 1950's & 1960's there were none. Correcting for population growth, zero is still zero.

What's the explanation? Obamacare? The low-spark of well-heeled gangs? The decline of Ike and Nixon?





crankster

Trad climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 05:17pm PT
Madbolter, you're talking nonsense. You presumably would arm the entire U.S. population; that's your solution to gun violence. And you write that with a straight face? I hope not.

[Click to View YouTube Video]
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 22, 2015 - 05:17pm PT
Moosedrool; I told you that you're not dealing with the brightest bulbs on the Christmas tree here. I doubt that Rdog could find Poland on the map. I doubt that he could find Europe on the map.

madbolter: You're right - I probably wouldn't say this stuff to your face. I do everything within my power to avoid mentally unstable gun fanatics.

BLUEBLOCR: How dare you actually claim to have the authority to pretend that you alone are capable of interpreting the words of Christ? If I want to go to church, I'll hang out with those Christian martyrs in Charleston instead of asking an apologist for mass murder like yourself for spiritual guidance.
GDavis

Social climber
SOL CAL
Jun 22, 2015 - 05:26pm PT
What do you guys want to talk about the next time a shooting happens?

I'm guessing within about 3 to 4 months we'll have another mass shooting, probably ballpark half dozen deaths and another half dozen serious injuries. A nation will mourn, Obama will make a speech, the whole enchilada.

Do we just blurt out the same talking points again? We all have solutions, so it's good we keep repeating them in our own little echo chamber to eachother. I also like how fired up everyone here seems to get at a problem that will NOT get solved and that WILL continue.

I don't know about what we've been talking about, or if any of the hair brained solutions presented here will turn out. But for SURE, 100%, there will be many more mass shootings.

So, at least we'll get some entertainment from it, right? That's all it is to us anyway. A chance to entrench ourselves at the expense of a national tragedy. Rad.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 22, 2015 - 05:41pm PT
MB if the way I remember your story is wrong, I apologize for it up front. I dont remember you saying they came at you, but I'll go back and look and I trust your not the rediting type.

Brandishing isn't just Yosemite Sam rootin tootin his pistols.
If your flashing a weapon to convey your intent to use it, guess what.

So you missed the irony in my statement, To bad, it was meant for serious gun toters like you. Your the ones costantly stating how infinitesimal the chances are of ever being a statistic from gun violence, yet you feel compelled to carry for protection at all times, I can smell the fear.

The problem we have here isn't guns and it isn't people, it's people with guns. Can we find mutual ground on keeping guns away from people with problems. No, because to many like you don't want to give ground for an unfounded fear of losing your guns it being such a slippery slope and all. You don't want a federal registry for guns, you want state control and you know stright up it won't work. None of the states are going to agree universally for any one law, let alone the many that States already have.

I don't feel your really trying to bring anything to the table here except for fearmongering. Any ideas that might help you stymeie if it doesnt fit your mind. We get it, nothing works for you, but some of use are willing to give. Sometimes compromise can is better than nothing.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 05:41pm PT
You presumably would arm the entire U.S. population

You're VERY confused.

I would not "arm" anybody. At all. Period.

I'm not the "active" one in the gun/anti-gun debate. The anti-gunners are the "active" ones, actively trying to DISARM people who want to be armed.

If people want to be armed, I say: let them be armed. If people don't want to be armed, I say: let them not be armed. I believe in the right of people to either entirely proxy off their right of self-defense or take a more proactive position regarding it, as incidents like this one reveal the truth that should be repeated again and again and again: When seconds count, the police are just minutes away.

Everybody in that church who WANTED to be armed had a RIGHT to be armed, and their state senate DISARMED them at the very place it turned out they most needed to exercise their rights.

Why do you liberals try to ACTIVELY take away people's right of self-defense?
Norton

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 05:53pm PT
Everybody in that church who WANTED to be armed had a RIGHT to be armed, and their state senate DISARMED them at the very place it turned out they most needed to exercise their rights.

Why do you liberals try to ACTIVELY take away people's right of self-defense?


what?

I think you are confused, it was the very conservative Republican South Carolina legislature that passed that state's law outlawing firearms in churches.

no "ordinary" person could legally have a gun with them in that church

but don't believe me, look it up, just takes a second

but back to your question: Why do conservatives take away the right of people to defend
themselves in their own state's houses of worship?
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 05:57pm PT
So you missed the irony in my statement, To bad, it was meant for serious gun toters like you.

I have NO idea what you can possibly mean by "serious gun toters." It's just more pejorative crap.

Your the ones costantly stating how infinitesimal the chances are of ever being a statistic from gun violence, yet you feel compelled to carry for protection at all times, I can smell the fear.

You are smelling your own armpits, bud.

The problem we have here isn't guns and it isn't people, it's people with guns.

Absolutely ridiculous and simplistic! If you can encapsulate the layers of social and human-nature problems in such an oversimplified statement, and then use that as your basis for your oversimplified nonsense about getting rid of guns to "solve" "the" problem, then there is nothing in your perspective with which to compromise.

Can we find mutual ground on keeping guns away from people with problems.

Sure! How often have I publicly stated that I'm all in favor of universal background checks, PROVIDED that the statute explicit disallows the feds from maintaining anything resembling a national gun registry? What do you want?

No, because to many like you don't want to give ground for an unfounded fear of losing your guns it being such a slippery slope and all.

You've got me profoundly confused with somebody else, perhaps because you spend most of your mental energy dreaming up new insults.

You don't want a federal registry for guns, you want state control and you know stright up it won't work. None of the states are going to agree universally for any one law, let alone the many that States already have.

I don't know "straight up" that it won't work, and neither do you. And in the United STATES of America, we do believe in States' rights. The feds have no actual constitutional power to regulate guns in the way you wish they did. And what we DO know STRAIGHT UP is that every time the feds overstep their bounds and try to prohibit something for which there is an active market, they DO NOT succeed! What they do is create a black market, with the additional crimes and abuses that always attend black markets.

I don't feel your really trying to bring anything to the table here except for fearmongering.

I don't feel you are really trying to bring anything to the table here except for insults and simplistic hand-wringing.


Any ideas that might help you stymeie if it doesnt fit your mind.

Pot calling kettle. Kettle. Here kettle, kettle, kettle.

We get it, nothing works for you, but some of use are willing to give.

I'll tell you what works for me: You liberals leaving me the hell alone! You are not willing to "give." All you ever want to do is take, take, take. Leave me and tens of millions like me alone, and we'll get along just fine.

It's you liberal "masterminds" with your absurd dream that you can fix ANYTHING with another law that have ruined this society (and on countless levels, but I won't get into thread drift). Sticking strictly to the issue of gun control, you fix NOTHING with your mastermind efforts.

Even Dave Kos very honorably admits that gun control in any traditional sense would not have kept this situation from happening.

The issues ARE vastly complicated... much too complicated for you "masterminds" to figure out and solve. Leave it alone, let people HAVE their rights instead of always trying to FIX things by stomping on those rights.

Had people like you not meddled, people in that church could have had a fighting chance. For all your talk about "giving," it's people like you that are TAKING at the most fundamental levels.

Sometimes compromise can is better than nothing.

You insult and insult and insult and then talk about "compromise." What a laugh!

Just leave me alone, and you'll be "doing" all that I care for YOU and your ilk to "do".
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:03pm PT
I have a dream. A dream of a world where there will be no more police. There will be no more armies. No judges and juries. There will be no more lynching and gang murders. No auto theft. No shoplifting. No strong-arm tactics by weak sauce players.

There will be just a bunch of heavily armed citizens (united?), paving (and keeping it paved) the way to truth, justice and the American way.


Infrastructure counts.


madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:03pm PT
You don't even want to disarm the criminals?

I was just about to compliment you on your very honorable post just upthread.

Of course I'd like to disarm criminals. The problem arises in how to do it. I have yet to hear a shred of a solution that doesn't STOMP on the rights of law-abiding citizens.

I'm all for universal background checks. I personally don't think they will accomplish much good, but even a little good is worthwhile, as long as it can be done without stomping on the self-defense rights of law-abiding citizens.

The LIBERALS (have to write it in all caps because I don't know why) are not calling for disarming the law-abiding reasonable gun owners.

Oh, come on. You know why! :-) It feels GOOD! Come on over to the dark side, Dave. You know you want to.

Regarding your statement, there are indeed liberals that are not calling for disarming citizens. There are many others that are. On this very thread, there's endless reference to "we need to have fewer guns" and so on. Pretty hard to tell where "limitations" and "disarmament" separate. Perhaps everybody on this thread should preface their positions with an acronym, like "Not about disarming society," or NADS, or "Disarm every member of society," or DEMS. You know, something like that, to make it clear what the "background" perspective of what often vague statements really is.

For my part, I believe in NADS! Get some!

You are debating with yourself.

Apparently not.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:07pm PT
How often have I publicly stated that I'm all in favor of universal background checks, PROVIDED that the statute explicit disallows the feds from maintaining anything resembling a national gun registry? What do you want

PROVIDED,they do it the way you want it.

Just like I said.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:16pm PT
PROVIDED,they do it the way you want it.

Oh, get serious, if possible.

Let's say they want to pass universal background checks that include a provision to not allow the sale of ANY more guns. Would you agree with that law?

If so, then you reveal your real perspectives based in fantasy land.

If not, then you also want laws to be passed "the way you want them."

Look, you asked for compromise. I've offered a VERY reasonable one.

Not good enough for you, no surprise.

Let the insults resume.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:17pm PT
I am a LARGO!

I LIKE it! I'll adopt it as well.

Although, I'm a LARGO with NADS. I assume you also are.
crankster

Trad climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:17pm PT
Chill, Madbolter. Getting a gun is about as hard as buying a pack of gum. Your side won.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:21pm PT
Your side won.

Not quite. A church full of people were threatened and many killed, while liberal masterminds in that state voted to disarm them and disallow them to have even a fighting chance.

I for one don't call that a win!
10b4me

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:21pm PT
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
Douglas Adams

johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:22pm PT
No I'm not in favor of baning any more guns, get off your fear train.
GDavis

Social climber
SOL CAL
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:24pm PT
while conservative masterminds in that state voted to arm anyone and create a situation where the only fix is to have gun battles in the streets cops-vs-robbers style.


madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:28pm PT
while conservative masterminds in that state voted to arm anyone and create a situation where the only fix is to have gun battles in the streets cops-vs-robbers style.

Here, let me fix that for you:

"While libertarians, realizing that there ARE no masterminds, have confidence in the inalienable rights of people and the people's responsible exercise of same."
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:29pm PT
The legislation is GOP controlled in South Caroline.

But go ahead and believe that the minority has the majority out voted.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:37pm PT
This is what matters


[Click to View YouTube Video]
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 06:41pm PT
Still, the thing that matters


[Click to View YouTube Video]
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 07:15pm PT
I am a LARGO!

I was 10 when I got my first 22 Ruger single shot rifle
Now I own a few more. After 51 years of owning guns
I have never had the urge to go out and mass kill people with my semi auto
weapons.

I knew this about you Cosmic. I even have a couple of guns. Can't remember the last time I fired one.

Are they really that important?
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 22, 2015 - 07:23pm PT
The legislation is GOP controlled in South Caroline.

But go ahead and believe that the minority has the majority out voted.

It is now.

It wasn't when that law went on the books.

But then let's not pass the opportunity to turn any tragedy into a game of partisan sport.

Norton

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 07:41pm PT
It wasn't when that law went on the books.

is that a fact, TGT?

so do tell us what year it was made law and what was the political party in control of
the legislature and the governor...

since you know this, also tell us what was the make up of the vote, how many Dems
and how many Repubs voted for and against?

does not really matter at this point does it, the fact is the vast majority of states have
laws against carrying guns into churches, but since you think this is important go ahead

Norton

Social climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 07:46pm PT
Not quite. A church full of people were threatened and many killed, while liberal masterminds in that state voted to disarm them and disallow them to have even a fighting chance.

prove it

prove that "liberals", Democrats controlled the SC state legislature and passed a law
that made it illegal to carry guns into churches in that state

what year was this law passed, and what was the political vote at that time, Dems and
Repubs, and what party did the governor belong to who signed that legislation?

this should be easy for you as you stated factually that "liberal masterminds "voted"
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 22, 2015 - 07:56pm PT

BLUEBLOCR: How dare you actually claim to have the authority to pretend that you alone are capable of interpreting the words of Christ?

Hey Stewart, I am sorry if you got that impression over these posts. I ve recently been lowered to an iPhone for my posting. Let me tell ya it's hard with my size 13 feet :D
Makes it hard to keep up.

But I do march on daring to test the truths. Not only mine, but those of others too.
I'm certainly not alone in my convictions, though it certainly seems like it on this forum.

Well I've learned some. I hope you have too
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 08:06pm PT


jstan

climber
Jun 22, 2015 - 10:34pm PT
There is little sensible I can say, but let me describe situations I have been witness to.

In addition to working with the Joshua Tree Clean Team I have been soloing. In downtown JT there is a low income housing facility with trash piled all around it. The trash is there because the owner is not willing to pay the fees required to dispose of it. One day as I was working I overheard two men talking about how they were doing. One said, "I know I am not the smartest ............ in the world, but I know how to do that." When I tried to think how I myself might come to grips had I that person's place and relationship with the culture, I could not avoid the conclusion he had somehow found about the only place a person could live. He was stronger in this regard than almost everyone, myself included. A little later I had to load a TV into my truck that was too big and awkward for me. When asked if they could help me they said they would. They both came over, suggested I stand aside, and lifted it into the truck.

When I first mentioned to others in the Clean Team I was considering this task, one person suggested I might well get shot if I knocked on doors. Another time as I was picking up in another stressed neighborhood across the road from Walmart in YV a resident of the area walked past me mumbling to himself, "It's clean enough here."

In my efforts I fully expected to encounter resentment. Just as I expected some level of resentment when I started working the piton problem in climbing. We all are human. The willingness to help I met in JT, told me they liked the trash no more than did I. We were on the same page. It was a very good feeling.

Finally, in my efforts so far, I have found four kitchen knives with six inch long blades. The last, in YV was thrown down under a bush. Which is what a person would do if they could not afford to be found in possession of such an item. We here on ST are embroiled in a discussion of the need to carry a protective firearm. It appears many other people feel they too are occasionally in danger.

Do we all suffer from this problem? Maybe we need to approach our discussion from that perspective?
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 23, 2015 - 07:30am PT
Bigotry - intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.
Studly

Trad climber
WA
Jun 23, 2015 - 07:40am PT
Dingbat, ;)
Just because some southern folk like flying the confederate flag due to their local heritage, it does not mean they are racist. I agree that it has been used for that purpose, but lumping everyone in under one category is a little, how do you say, dingy?
I,suppose you hate the song Freebird also?
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jun 23, 2015 - 07:54am PT
Why shouldn't they be proud of talking funny, dropping out of high school,
and marrying their cousins?
jstan

climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 08:12am PT
This is not helpful.

When we let someone or something cause us to be angry we give over control of what happens to another. In 1860 States' Rights was a red herring used to bring this about. For the few, war can be very profitable. Very few of the dead owned slaves. In 1861 when it became apparent the War would last a long time it was too late to consider some of the obvious and better alternatives.

Do we really need to emulate the lemming a second time?

Clearly now is not the time for inaction. It is time for thoughtful and clear headed action.

The several actions to be considered are already under productive discussion. Our most useful approach might be to join forces with all of the people who see these as issues, no matter their state of residence.
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jun 23, 2015 - 09:16am PT
I,suppose you hate the song Freebird also?

Even more than Stairway to Heaven. WEVC played that f*#king song every f*#king hour for three f*#king years.
dirtbag

climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 09:34am PT
Interestingly, Mississippi still flies the stars and bars. I guess they need some racial mass murders too, to see the light?



Maybe it won't be up there much longer, Dingus.

I heard a story on NPR this morning about the confederate flag, and it mentioned that the conservative speaker of the Mississippi house is proposing that the state remove the confederate symbol from its flag.
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jun 23, 2015 - 09:50am PT
Dingus, how is racisim right there on the flag. Which part represents racisim?
Federal cemetery in Chattanooga has no confederates in it. Only federal soldiers and nazis.


Ya know it's a good thing that the "East India Company flag of walmart" has never had any uncivil activity associated with it.
dirtbag

climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 09:55am PT
Seriously?
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 23, 2015 - 10:00am PT
Yes, dirtbag.

Tell us how this image on license plates is racist.

Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jun 23, 2015 - 10:08am PT
Saw a CBS "Sunday Morning" not long ago. Talked about the Triangle Trade involving New England. They said large amounts of rum were made there. Not once did I hear anything about slavery.


Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 23, 2015 - 10:29am PT
One thing we do know about that flag is that represents a bunch of losers.

The one conflict fought for that flag, they had their asses handed to them. The Union made monkeys out them. Lincoln made them all look stupid.

My Aunt used to drive around in her 240z with Jap Navy flag stickers on the side windows - barely 25 years after Nagasaki. I never understood that either. Why identify with losers? Especially one beaten as badly as Japan.

Then there's the Swastika Tattoo - which combines two extremely stupid things. Maybe that's just a *San Bernardino thing*, or maybe it's a consequence of the State emptying the prisons, but I'm seeing those all the time now.

Look forward, not back. And don't associate with losers. ( and if you do, don't advertise it )

the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Jun 23, 2015 - 10:32am PT
Of course you can't generalize how everyone thinks about the confederate flag. e.g. I doubt Tom Petty is a racist.

But there is the collective view about what something means. And that collective view is changing to see the flag as more and more racist and oppressive. And that's the result of many years of racist aholes, lynch mobs, etc. flying that flag. This latest piece of trash is just the latest example of this. I think it's fitting that this moron has turned the tide and instead of his desired intention of people rallying around the flag he has turned more people against it so they are taking it down and walmart and ebay won't sell it. Yes you have the freedom to fly it on your own home or pick up truck, but businesses and governments also have the freedom to decide they don't want to promote it anymore.

People still face racism in America (e.g. this thread topic) and some people don't get it or have enough empathy to understand what that must be like. As some posters above demonstrate.
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jun 23, 2015 - 10:39am PT
Rdog is right. Being brought into slavery was a lucky break! Those darkies had it made in the Old South. Free room and board provided by their kindly masters made for a happy existence. I know, I saw it in Birth of a Nation!
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Jun 23, 2015 - 10:41am PT
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jun 23, 2015 - 10:54am PT
eBay just announced that they won't cotton to Rebel flag listings.
So all those things are now gonna clog up the land fills? Wouldn't it
be better to sell them and then have all the buyers post their selfies
of them wiping their butts with 'em?

What's next, banning NASCAR paraphernalia?
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 10:57am PT
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=604&q=confederate+flag+tatoo&oq=confederate+flag+tatoo&gs_l=img.3..0i10l10.1175.6609.0.7156.22.16.0.6.6.0.147.1857.0j14.14.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..2.20.1880.WUtjLH3RNX4
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Jun 23, 2015 - 10:58am PT
It never ceases to amaze me how a singular isolated event can be spun and politicized to the point of absurdity.

This nutcase that killed the people in the church should have been executed himself 15 minutes after he confessed. In this case think of the money and time everyone could save. Instead we'll get to hear about it and all the spin for years and years.

Who cares what his "reasons" are or what flag he's seen posing with? Who cares what religion he claims to be or what he had for breakfast that morning?



Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jun 23, 2015 - 11:15am PT
I read that he tried in the church but he was out of ammo. A pity.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 11:20am PT
Actually I think he represents a considerable problem in this country of intolerance and prejudice, whether it's directed toward a different race, a different religion, sexual orientation, or some other difference between classes of people. Can you imagine if one group of climbers, trad perhaps, took offense at another group, like maybe sport climbers or boulderers, to the point of physically attacking them simply for their preferred style? The verbal abuse is already well-represented in too many numerous forum postings to even attempt a count.
Sport climbing is neither, riiight?
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jun 23, 2015 - 11:28am PT
"Look forward, not back. And don't associate with losers. ( and if you do, don't advertise it )"




By studying the past one might be able better navigate the future.
Yeah, no losers except that everybody probably loses once. Do you hang with yourself?
Black and white is simple but things are mostly grey.
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jun 23, 2015 - 11:36am PT
^^^^^^^^

Glue is getting to you!
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 23, 2015 - 11:50am PT
Same people here opposed to Obama (A BLACK President)...

are pretty much the same people here defending that stupid flag...

Count me as an exception to your "rule."

Surely you're trolling; I mean, really, you can't be serious.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jun 23, 2015 - 11:50am PT
Other than that it couldn't have been any dumber...

And the problem with that is? See how judgmental you are?
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jun 23, 2015 - 12:11pm PT
This nutcase that killed the people in the church should have been executed himself 15 minutes after he confessed.

Wrong, he should have executed himself 15 minutes before the shooting.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 12:12pm PT
You can endlessly argue about the traditions of the South, racism, flag symbolism, but the overriding concern in regards to Murder of Black's is the hugely disproportional amounts killing each other.

yes, your statistics are spot on

but isn't the point that this Charleston murder was purely white racism, versus the black
on black murders you point out are not racism but seemingly strongly related to high concentrations of the same race people, black, living in very close proximity and virtually all in poverty.

Or is there a point you are making that i am missing that is relating black on black murder rates to this single act of white racism?
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 12:17pm PT
How would you account for the disproportion in murder and violent crime rates? I would guess (without doing the research) that there are other disproportionate statistics in the areas of poverty, education, and gang participation as well. The question is what to do about it?

This individual crime was racially motivated. And it was committed with a firearm. So, those two things are primary subjects here. The questions being how to reduce racism and how to reduce access to guns for people like the perp?
Technically, due to the recent drug arrest and pending court case, he should have been legally prohibited from buying a firearm. I still think the racism part is a bigger issue, as it was his primary motivation for this; and it leads to so much more violence.
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Jun 23, 2015 - 12:57pm PT
My only point is that this one Murder/Tragedy receives a disproportionate amount of publicity, while other, more significant causes of misery for the Black Community are largely brushed aside. Statistical reality doesn't sell news / entertainment, emotion does.

Spot on...

All the absurd emotional hand-wringing...

"What do we do, what do we do?" Let's pass more useless laws banning flags or guns for crazy people! Maybe we'll make it real explicit that murder is already illegal and have signs printed up to establish "MURDER FREE ZONES".

What do we do? We caught the guy and he either dies or doesn't ever see the light of day. Case closed.

And we go on worrying about things that matter.

You cannot and never will prevent crazy people from doing crazy things. The killer's "motivations" are irrelevant.

Meantime probably 40 gang-bangers have probably killed each other over drug turf as they do every week in our urban kill zones. Maybe worry about that and trying to understand the causation there...

Norton

Social climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 01:04pm PT
Technically, due to the recent drug arrest and pending court case, he should have been legally prohibited from buying a firearm

true, but there also is no universal background checks required for private purchases,
so all he had to do was pick up the local newspaper and buy a gun, legally
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 23, 2015 - 01:11pm PT

I fail to see how the statistical apportionment of murder rates by race has anything to do with the subject at hand.

My only point is that this one Murder/Tragedy receives a disproportionate amount of publicity, while other, more significant causes of misery for the Black Community are largely brushed aside. Statistical reality doesn't sell news / entertainment, emotion does.

DMT, the question is why is white on black murder the only "subject at hand," when black on black murder is so much bigger a problem? The concern is not that we are spending conern and effort on this obviously racist murder, but that we spend too little time on the much bigger problem of black on black murder. Already, some have offered some explanations (poverty, education, etc.) for the latter, and those are good places to look.

To me another issue could be why Charleston reacted to white on black killing by coming peacefully together, while other places reacted by detroying their own communities.

Although the overriding cause of the Charleston massacre is clearly white racism by the perpetrator, observation suggests other issues as well. In that sense, I particularly admire Norton's posts on this thread, because he recognizes that the lack of a perfect response does not preclude an optimal response, and he suggests options whose efficacy we can test. We may have different views of the world, but his reasoning and methodology on this issue coincide with mine, even if our suggested solutions may differ.

John

Cragar

climber
MSLA - MT
Jun 23, 2015 - 01:16pm PT

I will take some milk with my toast.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 01:18pm PT
true, but there also is no universal background checks required for private purchases,
so all he had to do was pick up the local newspaper and buy a gun, legally

That doesn't make it legal. From the seller's standpoint, yes. The perp, however, is still a prohibited person.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 23, 2015 - 01:25pm PT
That doesn't make it legal. From the seller's standpoint, yes. The perp, however, is still a prohibited person.

I agree, but the purpose of background checks isn't to increase the category of illegal purchasers, but to make it possible to determine if the purchaser has a legal right to do so.

John
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jun 23, 2015 - 01:45pm PT
http://www.tulane.edu/~sumter/Reflections/LinWar.html
"In the twentieth century, this critical view of Lincoln's actions gained a wide audience through the writings of Charles W. Ramsdell and others. According to Ramsdell, the situation at Sumter presented Lincoln with a series of dilemmas. If he took action to maintain the fort, he would lose the border South and a large segment of northern opinion which wanted to conciliate the South. If he abandoned the fort, he jeopardized the Union by legitimizing the Confederacy. Lincoln also hazarded losing the support of a substantial portion of his own Republican Party, and risked appearing a weak and ineffective leader.

Lincoln could escape these predicaments, however, if he could induce southerners to attack Sumter, "to assume the aggressive and thus put themselves in the wrong in the eyes of the North and of the world." By sending a relief expedition, ostensibly to provide bread to a hungry garrison, Lincoln turned the tables on the Confederates, forcing them to choose whether to permit the fort to be strengthened, or to act as the aggressor. By this "astute strategy," Lincoln maneuvered the South into firing the first shot."


Lincoln knew exactly what he was doing. The repubs don't exalt him for nothing!

Norton

Social climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 01:45pm PT
That doesn't make it legal. From the seller's standpoint, yes. The perp, however, is still a prohibited person.

true, but as been pointed out countless times, illegally motivated people do not care
a twit about "laws"

and in addition to what JohnE said another purpose of background checks or even laws
in general is to provide the state with the legal framework to both charge and prosecute,
in these cases to hold publicly responsible those who knowingly sell firearms to others,
without verifying the potential buyer's legal status to purchase
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 23, 2015 - 01:48pm PT
Curious that a law needs passing to pull down a flag nobody wants flying anymore.

That tells me there must be some law requiring that flag be flown.

Who's responsible for that law? Which governor signed that?

I guarantee it hasn't flown continuously since the Civil War - no way that flag was kosher during Reconstruction.

That means somebody thought it was a good idea to bring it back. It'd be good to know who that somebody is.
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jun 23, 2015 - 01:57pm PT
Of course it was not flown during reconstruction. It could have meant immediate extermination. There were Massachusetts soldiers that advocated genocide. They said the south would never be right until all the southern people were exterminated. Damn what a lot I have inherited! Oh well, the one thing we seem to do well is fight......in spite of what you blue bellies think. Jack Hinson sure put it to you bitches!
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 01:58pm PT
^Who is Jack Hinson?

The flag flying began in the early sixties in response to the Civil rights movement in the south. I believe an elected official in S. Carolina stated the year as 1962, but I'm not sure.

EDIT: Apparently Hinson was a sniper whose kids were killed and had their heads implanted on poles at his house. The claim is that he was neutral at the beginning of the war, but had a change of heart.



jstan

climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 02:06pm PT
Caveman:
In 1859 would you have objected to receiving market value for each slave you owned? Knowing full well they had no other place to go and you might even have been relieved of the need to make adequate food available?

What a deal!

The onus would then have been put on the North to pony up the money to give the slaves an option. The people with the superior principles would then have had the chance to put money where their mouth was. The North would have been maneuvered into subsidizing your labor cost.

What the Hell was that war really about? We think Viet Nam was an imponderable.
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 02:08pm PT
^Hinson

True, but you kinda of wonder when someone is randomly thrown into the mix 150 years later, doncha?
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jun 23, 2015 - 02:20pm PT
"What the Hell was that war really about?"

Tariffs, control, lowland english vs celtic hoard, Braveheart vs King Edward, fences, no trespassing signs, taxes, coming up with the idea of secession then jumping the south for the audacity to actually do it. Im sure that whatever happened in the south the southerners considered it their business and wanted no help from the north. I used to ask myself why the south would fight to keep their slaves. Hell, die in the hundreds of thousands. Well the answer is not nearly as easy as "we are all evil".

Jstan If I had slaves I would feel obligated to care for them. Do unto others. My guess is that had I been around then I would not own slaves. I would be in the south though. I've been up north, they don't have enough heat and humidity!
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 23, 2015 - 02:20pm PT
Dylann Roof is a Devout Conservative Christian


His Manifesto sites that his inspiration is from the Council Of Conservative Citizens, A CONSERVATIVE Christian Group that want America to become a Christian Theocracy


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/06/22/the-odd-political-success-of-the-white-supremacist-council-of-conservative-citizens-explained/

Here's a brief history of the Council of Conservative Citizens.

Born of school desegregation

The nationwide council wasn't formed until 1985, but it has roots in the school desegregation era. It was started by officials of the White Citizens Council, a 1950s southern group that sprang up to oppose the Supreme Court-mandated desegregation of public schools.

Gordon Baum was one such White Citizens Council official to help form this new council. The Missouri personal injury lawyer sought support for his new group via mailing lists from the White Citizens Council.

Many of these neo-Confederate groups, the CCC included, derive their ideology from even further back in American history, Hague wrote. They (inaccurately) believe the Civil War was fought not over slavery but for the future of American Christianity. The groups' leaders share 19th-century theological writings making a biblical justification for slavery and segregation.
Advertisement

"Neo-Confederacy is an active and ongoing attempt to reshape the United States in the Old South's image," Hague wrote in an essay published on the Southern Poverty Law Center Web site.

Groups like the CCC advocate a return to Christian values they say call for homogeneous societies.

"We believe that the United States of America is a Christian country, that its people are a Christian people, and that its government and public leaders at all levels must reflect Christian beliefs and values," the group's statement of values reads. "We therefore oppose all efforts to deny or weaken the Christian heritage of the United States."

This council eventually grew to about 15,000 members, mostly in the Deep South. Hague says many of the people who lead these types of neo-Confederate groups are intellectuals -- lawyers, professors, pastors and community leaders -- who skilfully spin history to match their beliefs. Even movies like "Braveheart" are interpreted by white supremacists "as mirror images of their own struggles," Hague wrote.

Segregation is a Christian value according to them.

I'm sure Dylann Roof is a Republican as well, since he considers himself to be Conservative.
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jun 23, 2015 - 02:27pm PT
^^^^...as astute an assessment as who is an Obama voter.
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 02:37pm PT
"You know neither me, nor My Father. If you knew Me you would know My Father also."

-either Jack Hinson or Mike Hynson


JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 23, 2015 - 02:43pm PT
Interesting observations, as usual, jstan. Sad to say, I wonder if we aren't reenacting that failure to put our money where our mouths are in the current situation. We all decry racism, but few want to spend anything of our own to fix it, or to deal with what appears to be intractible problems of poverty.

I remember when Tom Higgins joined VISTA. Young idiot that I was, I thought, "Wow! They pay him enough to buy a Porsche. Pretty cool." I never thought about his opportunity cost in doing something tangible to try to help.

Most of us on this thread see the obvious racism involved in the Charleston attack (is there anyone who doesn't?), but our solutions all seem to involve someone else paying to fix it.

John
jstan

climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 02:43pm PT
Try not to be surprised when it comes to politics. You can still run into internet sites following Hitler.

Stephen Douglass? Pffffft! That's easy.
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jun 23, 2015 - 03:17pm PT
Jack Hinson sure put it to you bitches!

That's nothing compared to what Sherman did to you peckerwoods!

War is the remedy that our enemies have chosen, and I say let us give them all they want.

I intend to make Georgia howl.

My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

I beg to present you as a Christmas gift the city of Savannah.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 23, 2015 - 04:11pm PT
And I must ask , as I have had conversations with my black friends about slavery, where would blacks be today in the USA had it not been for slavery?

Read that on a website with a swastika did ya?

Your black friends, so you can't be racist, right? You don't have a black friend that would ever say slavery was good for them, ever, not a one. Never will be one. Please try to use things that are real.


TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 23, 2015 - 04:15pm PT

johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 23, 2015 - 04:24pm PT

But then let's not pass the opportunity to turn any tragedy into a game of partisan sport

TGT, post after post from MD about dems fault for the law and conservatives doing this and that and even blaming the dem pastor and not one peep, till someome called him on it.

WTF?

crankster

Trad climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 04:25pm PT
Ha. There's a party counting on the Dixie vote and it's not Hillary's.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 23, 2015 - 04:35pm PT
You just twisted your self again, freaking contortionist.
jstan

climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 04:38pm PT
A part of the American experience often forgotten.

https://www.teachervision.com/slavery-us/resource/3848.html


Indentured Servants' Experiences 1600-1700
BEFORE THE JOURNEY: "Many of the spirits [people who recruited indentured servants] haunted the London slums and those of Bristol and other seaports. It was not difficult to find hungry and thirsty victims who, over a dinner and much liquor, would sign anything before them. The spirit would then hustle his prey to his headquarters to be added to a waiting company of others, safely kept where they could not escape until a ship was ready for them. An easier way was to pick up a sleeping drunk from the gutter and put him aboard a vessel for America, where, with no indenture, he could be sold to his own disadvantage and with the American planter's gain. Children were valuable and could be enticed with candy to come along with a spirit. Sometimes they, and older people too, were seized by force."

THE JOURNEY: The ocean journey to America usually took eight to twelve weeks. Indentured servants were packed into the ships tightly, often being held in the hold without a chance to get fresh air. "Every two weeks at sea the [indentured servant] passengers received an allowance of bread. One man and his wife, having eaten their bread in eight days, staggered before the captain and begged him to throw them overboard, for they would otherwise starve before the next bread day. The captain laughed in their faces, while the ship's mate, even more of a brute, gave them a bag of sand and told them to eat that. The couple did die before the next ration of bread, but the captain charged the other passengers for the bread the two would have eaten if they had survived."

UPON ARRIVAL IN AMERICA: Some indentured servants had their contract of service worked out with waiting American colonists who would be their masters for four to seven years. Others, upon arrival, were bought and sold much in the same manner as slaves. An announcement in the Virginia Gazette read, "Just arrived at Leedstown, the Ship Justitia, with about one Hundred Healthy Servants, Men Women and Boys. . . . The Sale will commence on Tuesday the 2nd of April."

TREATMENT BY THEIR MASTERS: Indentured servants had few rights. They could not vote. Without the permission of their masters, they were not allowed to marry, to leave their houses or travel, nor buy or sell anything. Female indentured servants were often raped without legal recourse. Masters often whipped and beat their indentured servants. One man testified: "I have seen an Overseer beat a Servant with a cane about the head till the blood has followed, for a fault that is not worth the speaking of...."

WORK IN AMERICA: In the 1600s, most indentured servants were put to work in the tobacco fields of Virginia and Maryland. This was hard manual labor under the grueling hot summer sun, under which Europeans were not accustomed to working. Overseers were often cruel, beating the servants to make them work faster and harder.

AFTER CONTRACT WAS COMPLETED: Although many masters craftily figure out ways to extend an indentured servant's bondage (through accusing the servant of stealing, impregnating a female indenture servant, etc.), most indentured servants who survived the frrst four to seven years in America were freed. The master was required (depending upon the rules of the colony) to provide his former servant with the following: clothing, two hoes, three barrels of corn, and fifty acres of land.
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jun 23, 2015 - 04:53pm PT
"That's nothing compared to what Sherman did to you peckerwoods!"



Damn! you ain't kiddin about that! We remember that little excursion. Thing is it took Sherman a whole army. Hinson was just one man.

Even steven my man Cleburne (yes, a Southern general I admire) would roll Sherman up like a blanket. We did the best we had with what we had.
jstan

climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 05:00pm PT
All of this is happening incredibly quickly and is happening at the state level.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/23/politics/confederate-flags-southern-states-debate-legislators/index.html

Confederate flag debate sweeps South: South Carolina, Mississippi
By Jeremy Diamond and Eugene Scott, CNN
Updated 6:48 PM ET, Tue June 23, 2015
Where the Confederate flag is still seen

Story highlights
South Carolina House voted 103-10 to debate taking the Confederate flag down from the capitol grounds
Virginia's governor announced Tuesday that it would remove the flag from state license plates

Washington (CNN)State legislators across the South are now taking up the debate over the prominence of the Confederate flag in their states after conservative leaders displayed a sudden swell of support on Monday for removing the Confederate flag from the State House grounds in South Carolina.

The South Carolina House passed an amendment on Tuesday allowing debate on removing the Confederate flag from Capitol grounds. The vote passed 103-10.

Lawmakers will next consider one or more of several proposals currently being discussed around the State House. Whichever emerges as the consensus bill will likely have to go through the full, formal legislative process -- committee mark-up in both the House and the Senate -- before receiving votes for full passage. A two-thirds majority vote in both chambers of the Legislature will be necessary in order for the measure reach Haley's desk and subsequently remove the flag from the Capitol grounds.

In Mississippi, GOP House Speaker Philip Gunn said it was time for his state to change its flag, which includes the Confederate insignia -- a sign of the slave-holding South.

"We must always remember our past, but that does not mean we must let it define us," Gunn said Monday night in a Facebook post. "As a Christian, I believe our state's flag has become a point of offense that needs to be removed. We need to begin having conversations about changing Mississippi's flag."

South Carolina's House of Representatives passed an amendment Tuesday afternoon that would allow debate on whether to remove the Confederate flag from Statehouse grounds. Representatives passed the resolution by 103-10 votes. The state's Senate still must vote on the issue.

As national Republican leaders -- from the chairman of the Republican National Committee to most 2016 GOP contenders -- backed South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley's calls to remove the flag, the debate has now fully busted out of the Palmetto State and broached party lines.

South Carolina legislators will meet Tuesday to debate removing the flag, just hours after rallies were planned for the Statehouse grounds.

"This is a circumstance where the people let the politicians," South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham said on CNN's "At this Hour" on Tuesday. "I came to conclude after going to Charleston that we had to act and sooner rather than later, and God help South Carolina if we fail to achieve the goal of removing the flag."

RELATED: Why the Confederate flag still flies

Civil rights leaders and black elected officials are now seizing the moment to renew their calls for the flag's removal, driving off a resurgence of activism sparked by the racially-motivated killing of nine African-Americans by avowed white supremacist Dylann Roof, who had previously posted pictures online holding the Confederate flag.

Mississippi State Sen. Kenneth Wayne Jones, a Democrat and the chairman of the state legislature's black caucus, said Tuesday that South Carolina took a "bold step" forward and said his state will now follow that lead.

"They realize how offensive it is plus they also realize that most of the things that done now based on race, or hate crimes as we say, you see symbols like this and no longer can we afford to have everybody in a state represented by these symbols," Jones said Tuesday on CNN's "New Day."

Mississippi in 2001 voted to keep the Confederate symbol as part of the state flag in a 2001 referendum, but Jones said recent events present an opportunity to reignite the debate -- one that should focus on the idea of removing exclusive symbols from the Mississippi flag.

A decade after the end of the Civil War, a veteran of the Confederate States of America examines a Union water bottle in front of a Confederate flag in 1875. Here's a look at the evolution of that flag:
Evolution of the Confederate flag 6 photos
EXPAND GALLERY
"Nothing represents African-Americans in that flag and in that Confederacy but the fact that the states didn't hide the fact that from an economic development standpoint they were going to keep on owning people of color to do the work to make the money," Jones said.

"What we're saying is that in this day and time and in light of horrific events that has the dialogue going, it's time for all of us to sit down -- Progresssive individuals, Republicans, democrats, black, white -- and say OK, let's get a flag that represents the state as a whole and not just have a one-sided thing that stands for so much dark history in Mississippi," Jones added.

Republican and Democratic leaders in the Tennessee's Legislature are also taking a closer look at the Tennessee state flag, which includes Confederate symbols, and are calling for the removal of a bust of Confederate General and Ku Klux Klan leader Nathan Bedford Forrest which currently sits outside the state senate chamber.

Activists are also calling for a closer look at the state flags of six other Southern states, in addition to those of Mississippi and Tennessee, which also include symbols evoking those states' Civil War battle flags. They include Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia and North Carolina.

And in Virginia, Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe tied the shootings to a recent Supreme Court ruling on the use of the flag on state license plates, when he called for end to its use in that format in his state.

"I have directed Secretary of Transportation Aubrey Layne to develop a plan for replacing the currently-issued plates as quickly as possible," McAuliffe said at an event Tuesday morning.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 23, 2015 - 05:10pm PT
In regards to all the other murders out there,

I think all the black on black, drug dealer on drug dealer, gang bangers on gangbangers murders aren't that they terrible acts, but more like they involve terrible people. When a man and a man want to go toe to toe till death, or someone gets murdered because of some of the bad choices they made in life, its old hat to us anymore. I'm not saying to forget about those, but we do have other irons in the fire

When a single person walks imto a church, school or where ever and mows down a group of innocent people, of course it's going to be more news worthy! Rightly so I might say.

My .02$ worth.

HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Jun 23, 2015 - 05:11pm PT
Now that there's blood on the pseudo Confederate's hands they're scrambling to tear down their public symbols. That won't have much effect on their true feelings and no effect on the jackals hiding behind respectability. Many of the sons and daughters of the elders have already been corrupted. It will take another generation or two to purge Racism from the deep South.

Why haven't they torn down that racist symbol already? There must be an innate reason they've been putting it off since the Civil Rights Act (1965)
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 05:12pm PT
The Nuge didn't even live in the south and he single-handedly could have kicked Hinson's ass.


Norton

Social climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 05:20pm PT
Even steven my man Cleburne (yes, a Southern general I admire) would roll Sherman up like a blanket.


So Caveman, tell us why you "admire" this southern general?

perhaps his belief in and passion for fighting and dying on behalf of "states' rights"?

just curious
Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jun 23, 2015 - 06:19pm PT
Why do I admire Cleburne? Short question long answer. We're both Irish. He was a disciplined man. Hard to understand. I find it hard to fathom the charge at Franklin. I wanted to find out exactly why these people fought and died like that. My yankee niece says they were stupid. I don't buy it. Something else drove those folk. Cleburne happened to be a superb General. Hell, I don't think Champ Ferguson is the criminal the yanks would have us believe. Complicated, but it is our history.


BTW locker....I'll defend the flag and I voted for Obama.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Jun 23, 2015 - 06:22pm PT
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=71d_1367523618
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 06:26pm PT
After the family buried their children’s remains, Hinson swiftly turned his attention to exacting terrible vengeance. Hinson freed his slaves, moved his family west, and carefully oversaw the manufacture of a specially crafted sniper rifle. Certain that his surviving family was safe, he initiated his highly personalized war of retribution. McKenney writes, “Whatever the details, the Federals had sown the wind, and for the rest of the war, they would reap the whirlwind.”

Hidden deep in Hinson’s Scottish heritage resided the impulse for blood and retribution. The first person Hinson hunted down was the hated Union lieutenant; his second kill was the sergeant who seemed to take delight in impaling the boys’ heads on the family’s gateposts.

The majority of the soldiers Hinson killed were shot in the back or while sleeping.

Caveman

climber
Cumberland Plateau
Jun 23, 2015 - 06:33pm PT
"The majority of the soldiers Hinson killed were shot in the back or while sleeping."

With the 18 lb long gun he had made? He was reputedly a sniper. I have not heard about the asleep or in the back. I will admit once I had target acquisition, at distance, front side or back means little.
Come to think of it for a sniper anyone was and is fair game. I had read that regular troops would not shoot when the enemy relieved themselves. Snipers supposedly did not follow this rule.
zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 06:40pm PT
So Roof just needed to gun up appropriately and call himself a sniper.

Gold's Gym has requested their shirt back.

zBrown

Ice climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 06:59pm PT
As I understand it, Walmart is having a "fire" sale on confederate flags.

Wouldn't it be something if someone bought them up and took them to the capitol of S. Carolina, wherever in the Hell that is, and had a massive burn out tomorrow.



nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Jun 23, 2015 - 07:09pm PT
as the military initiates Jade Helm 15 they should fly that flag. makes perfect sense if you think about it. armed insurrection and treason and that flag.
dave729

Trad climber
Western America
Jun 23, 2015 - 07:13pm PT
Is it a good idea to remove the symbols reminding people
how screwed up the south was and what it took to get their
heads right?

Well sure. I'm on the right side of this controversy.
Or am I?
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 23, 2015 - 07:33pm PT
So what have all of these steely-eyed "patriots" taught us so far?

-The War on Drugs hasn't been a $1 TRILLION+ waste of money that has destroyed the lives of countless millions of non- violent U.S. citizens; on the contrary, it has achieved spectacularly positive results.

-The War on Drugs has had no impact whatsoever on the U.S. crime rate.

-Poverty is not a factor contributing to crime rates, since everybody in the U.S. is doing just fine.

-Racism doesn't exist in the U.S., and blacks (and other visible minorities) are not disproportionately represented in the prison population because (see above) their standard of living is identical to that of the white population - none of whom are poor either.

-The solution to firearm violence is MORE firearms.

-Armed vigilantes can always be relied upon to instantly assess the difference between a situation that can be de-escalated and one that requires an immediate use of lethal force.

 Vigilantes will never miss their intended target, so in a situation involving mass panic, the vigilante can be relied upon to hit criminals and no one else.

-In the event that there is a legal inquiry concerning their use of lethal force, they can be relied upon, without fail, to provide a completely honest account of their actions (since "patriots" have a profoundly developed sense of justice), even if their behaviour is considered to be a criminal offence.

There is no reason for police to be subject to Government scrutiny. Also, police forces should not exist in the first place since Government is evil and wishes only to enslave freedom-loving patriots.

-It is important to debate the various shapes of the Confederate flag, since racists are deeply concerned about being mistaken for those who just wish to honour their ancestors - the ancestors who treated their black brethern with the deepest respect back in the old days.

Oh - and my favourite - those 9 victims in the Charleston mass murder died because God wanted them to sit by His side in heaven.

Norton

Social climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 07:37pm PT
yes Stewart, well done, I think your summary was perfect!
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 23, 2015 - 08:05pm PT
-Armed vigilantes can always be relied upon to instantly assess the difference between a situation that can be de-escalated and one that requires an immediate use of lethal force.

Thank God that we don't have a serious vigilante problem in the US, particularly since SO many cops seem to have a problem with threat-assessment and appropriate use of force.

Vigilantes will never miss their intended target, so in a situation involving mass panic, the vigilante can be relied upon to hit criminals and no one else.

Again, thank God we don't have a vigilante problem, since SO many cops seem to have a problem with hitting what they are supposedly aiming at, even after emptying multiple magazines.
jstan

climber
Jun 23, 2015 - 08:56pm PT
Back a few I posted that perhaps we might change the perspective from which we view all of our problems. Everyone is concerned with how their personal welfare might be improved. Individual X is for or against guns because someone might shoot individual X or make them change their behavior. Never mind all the blacks, whites, and children who are dying. This approach accepts the problem as being national in nature. That changes the context. I find knives on the ground and realize, being a black has to be scary. You have had some brush with the law so you can't carry a weapon. What do you do to protect yourself? Carry a knife? If you do you can't run when an officer or any two bit yo-yo tells you to stand still. Now you will get shot. Because you are black.

Everyone has the problem. We are more able to find answers when we stop thinking only of ourselves.

I have a rule of avoiding suggesting changes we might consider. Because that causes people to bury the need for finding an answer and replace it with the need to point how dim witted I am. I will violate that rule here. Criticizing each other is such an easy task, it escapes me why this is so popular.

The present widespread discussion over long imprisonment for offenses like possessing a drug and how it causes our incarcerated population to explode, suggests people may be open to changing their views as regards the justice system. That system affects each of us. In different ways but it still affects all. Things to think about:

1. How can you convict someone solely on testimony from a jailhouse informant. His testimony has conflict of interest written all over it.
2. Jail terms should be determined at least partly by whether jail is effective. If jail has a 100% recidivism rate, what do we think we are accomplishing?
3. We might also think about making correction proportional to the damage done to society. A CEO who robs a million people of a trillion dollars of their life savings should not walk and have only to find a new job.
4. And what's with the refusal to release people when good DNA evidence says they are innocent?

That's enough to get me in serious trouble, so I'll stop. The better stuff out there should be discussed in preference to what I have suggested.
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jun 23, 2015 - 09:08pm PT
You shouldn't get in trouble for writing posts like that.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 08:35am PT
jstan, I appreciate your perspective. Seems lost on this lot.

Most often what I see in arguments and discussions are people bringing their confirmational bias to the table, and no ability to objectively evaluate the data.
I used to be 100% against gun control of any kind; but the data supports a different perspective. Y'all can't seem to get past that, though, and address the bigger issues. Something about trees in a forest... yada yada yada...
It's ok though, most of you will not get murdered by gun. Not to say you won't be victims of violent crime; but that's a different set of data, now isn't it? And hey, it's not like you can't be killed or maimed in some other way. After all, it's really just the guns that seem to concern ya. Carry on.
jstan

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 09:10am PT
If you look at the impact on us made by the killing of nine people, you have to come away with the conclusion there is an opportunity for us now to look at the issues in a new way. We need to do that if we are to make progress honoring the sacrifices made by those nine soules. How tragic it will be if we do nothing.

We can start simply by changing the way we use language.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 10:05am PT
More regulation...

Check, although the devil's in the details!

Licenses/certs...

Check, although without a national gun registry.

Some sort of basic course to show competency...

Check, and already the case in many states.

Registration...

Why?

Track/record all AMMO sales...

Why? And how can this be done without a national registry?

ZERO assault type weapons allowed...

What does that even mean?
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jun 24, 2015 - 10:12am PT
Locker,

How is one expected to gain competency to pass your test without shooting a bunch of ammo?

Then you need to shoot a bunch more to keep your skills sharp.

madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 10:20am PT
Please tell me that you don't REALLY need an explanation...

Yeah, that's a punt.

Of course I do, because just putting a hand-grip on a semi-auto hunting rifle does not suddenly make it an "assault weapon."

So, since you demand "ZERO tolerance" on "assault weapons," you should be able to provide a RIGOROUS definition of what they are.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 10:21am PT
Still on guns, eh?
318 million people in the US. Depending where you look, about 1/3 (maybe more now) own firearms.
300+ million guns in the US, of every type. More than enough for every person to have one.
Bet your ass there's easily more than 100 rounds of ammo per gun, on average.

Are you going to require everyone who owns a gun to retroactively show proficiency?
Are you going to require all "assault weapons" to be surrendered?
How do you define "assault weapon"?
What's the point of tracking ammo sales... competition shooters may run through several thousand rounds per year, just saying... so do you intend to limit the amount of ammo someone can purchase and/or store?
Why register? Just so law enforcement knows who has a gun and who doesn't? Or to later collect firearms as they are determined to be "assault weapons"? Or to collect firearms from persons who subsequently become "prohibited" for various reasons?
What do you expect the compliance rate to be?
How much will it cost, and who's going to pay it?

I'm asking because I don't much believe the type of weapon or the amount of ammunition makes a very big difference. I've posted before, and here it is again for your intelligent consideration, fast shooting on-target with a REVOLVER.
[Click to View YouTube Video]

That's not an "assault weapon", and I'll grant you the guy is at the top of the shooting game; but it wouldn't take a whole lot of practice to be proficient with ANY of the firearms today considered both traditional hunting guns, and NON-assault style weapons, classes that in most circles are under no attempted regulation.

That's why I think addressing issues that lead people to violence would be far more effective at reducing it than simply limiting firearm access, as well as having the benefit of treating other important aspect of social ills.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 10:23am PT
National registry sounds GOOD to me...

Then you'll FOREVER have a fight on your hands from the "gun nuts" who will never agree that the FEDS should have a database of every person who could in principle resist them.

So when it's discovered that someone has purchased enough ammo to take out a city...

Again, the basis of armed resistance is both arms AND ammo. As in the above point, "gun nuts" are NEVER going to agree to have ammo tracked.

Furthermore, you're solving nothing that matters with such legislation. Quantity of ammo (at least quantities that anybody would care to track, as you suggest) has NEVER been a factor in any of the scenarios that get anti-gunners all worked up about new legislation.
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jun 24, 2015 - 10:26am PT
Ron, you can't be so stupid to not know the difference between a hunting rifle and a military rifle. Stop trying to be obtuse.

hen you'll FOREVER have a fight on your hands from the "gun nuts" who will never agree that the FEDS should have a database of every person who could in principle resist them.

The "gun nuts" are not going to resist the government. They'll do whatever the oligarchs tell them to do. That's the way they roll, they love authority.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 10:28am PT
A single box of pistol generally includes 50 rounds. That's five mags @ ten rounds each.
Rifle ammo typically comes in 20 round boxes. Harder to make a generalization for reloadability there.

How many rounds does it take to conduct a mass shooting? One box, maybe?

What are you going to do, limit people to single-shot muskets and three rounds a week?

People want real, meaningful discussion. There it is, real and in your face. No side-stepping, no bullsh#t.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 10:40am PT
those so opposed to more regulation have yet to offer any suggestions other than leave things as they are...

Ahh... this looks like the argument for Obumblecare: "We don't know what's in it; we don't know what it's really going to do; we don't know what it's really going to cost; but let's PASS IT NOW and find out." And then the "response" to the endless problems is: "Well, the Rebumblecons didn't have any solution except to do nothing."

Look, doing a BAD thing rather than nothing is NEVER a good idea!

So, bring REAL (and enforceable) suggestions to the table, and people like me are very open to talking.

I'm not opposed to universal background checks, even though I don't believe they will accomplish anything meaningful. But you can't embed a BAD thing in that legislation and call it "compromise." MY compromise is to agree to an inane thing that will have real costs and accomplish little or no good.

So don't say that people like me are all about leaving things the way they are! If you think universal background checks can do some good, I disagree but won't fight that point. But don't get greedy and insist on a national gun registry along with it.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 10:50am PT
those so opposed to more regulation have yet to offer any suggestions other than leave things as they are...

1. universal background checks, after which you can take your pick of weapon style.
2. Should a registry scheme be installed, its sole purpose would be to remove guns from subsequently prohibited persons.
3. Tracking ammo could only be effective when cross-referenced with a registration scheme. Or, you could limit sales of ammo to those who have shown proficiency.
4. Speaking of proficiency, I agree with that for getting a CCW permit; not so much for the general public. The main two purposes are to a)reduce accidents and b)reduce the chance of a CCW permittee from utterly failing in a defensive situation (plenty more discussion to be had on that though). The accident rate is statistically low, though highly sensational. A better way to deal with that is to require safe storage and better firearm safety education.
5. Address mental health.
6. Address poverty.
7. Address racism and other hate speech. This may require giving up a few rights to freedom of speech, such as the rights we've given up toward combatting terrorism; but hey... isn't it already bordering on terrorism anyway?
8. Address drug manufacturing, dealing, and addiction. Legalize pot to much more extent than it is now. Not so much the rest of them. My opinion.
9. Pour more money into education. Give people the skills necessary to get a job, increase their quality of life, and boost our economy.
10. Healthcare. Sooo much to say about that. Cheaper, better, etc.

All of those warrant much greater discussion, and making improvements to all of them have the potential to reduce the amount of violent crime we're experiencing.

Or were you not referring to me Locker?
pud

climber
Sportbikeville & Yucca brevifolia
Jun 24, 2015 - 11:00am PT
Name calling and hate in the name of tolerance.
Once again, the ST crowd takes the low road.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 11:00am PT
I figured. But what the hell... gave me a platform...
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 11:07am PT
Referring to locker four posts up. Though I have been called a lot of names. Meh. Probably true.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 11:25am PT
"Until a law is broken, there is pretty much nothing we can do"...

And there it is. Voluntary reduction of the number of guns? Pre-crime enforcement?

On my way into the office today, this woman is next to me on the freeway. She's texting, although Colorado has a no-texting law. The law doesn't apply to her; she does what she feels.

She drifts into my lane and keeps coming. I start to take evasive action and give the barest toot on the horn: "I'm here. Others are around you. There's a whole world outside of your phone, and you're in the midst of it and affecting it!"

She jerks back into her lane while flipping me off. How DARE I warn her and keep her from getting into an accident?

The solution? Of course: tell her to reduce the number of cars she owns. Next time one wears out or she gets tired of it, she should just junk it rather than trade in for another. One less car on the road, and one less driven by HER!

The number of guns in circulation is irrelevant, just as the number of cars owned by somebody is irrelevant. The issue is responsible ownership/usage. You can legislate that all you want, but society is chock full of people to whom the law just doesn't apply; they do what they feel.

Have a universal background check, and all you've done is made it actionable AFTER THE FACT for this latest sicko to get his gun. But, like the texting woman on the freeway, the law doesn't apply to guys like sick-boy. They do whatever they feel.

Drop a dime on our latest sicko pre-crime, and what can get accomplished? Nothing, just as Locker said, which is as it should be!

The alternative is a Minority Report society.

Sh|t's gonna happen. Fortunately the per-capita amount of it is very low, even in our "out of whack USA." If you say it's not "low enough," you're left with trying to engage in some form of pre-crime enforcement. Good luck with that! Sh|t's GONNA happen, and you can't root out these closet nut jobs in advance.

Meanwhile, the idea of reducing the capacity of the law-abiding citizenry to defend themselves (perhaps with "fewer" guns) when the sh|t does happen is a really bad "answer."
Gary

Social climber
From A Buick 6
Jun 24, 2015 - 11:31am PT
David M. Kennedy, the director of the Center for Crime Prevention and Control at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, argues that the issue of gun violence can seem enormous and intractable without first addressing poverty or drugs.

Very much to the point.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 11:45am PT
Damn, Locker

with fingers that long she should have no problem playing Hendrix's Little Wing.......
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 11:46am PT
This thread is now SO defiled. Gagggggg... what has been seen cannot be unseen.
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Jun 24, 2015 - 11:48am PT
Just the distinction of "gun violence" is stupid.

But it makes it easy for the sheep to identify an easy solution. Makes for great MSM propaganda for the non-critical-thinking crew to lap up.

Along the lines of "Islamic terrorist" or "Black Poverty".

Own the language and it's easy to misdirect those with limited attention spans.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 11:58am PT
One side fears losing more rights...

Other side fears getting SHOT...

If history teaches us anything, it teaches us that the former fear is much more well-founded!
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 24, 2015 - 12:03pm PT
The present widespread discussion over long imprisonment for offenses like possessing a drug and how it causes our incarcerated population to explode, suggests people may be open to changing their views as regards the justice system. That system affects each of us. In different ways but it still affects all. Things to think about:

1. How can you convict someone solely on testimony from a jailhouse informant. His testimony has conflict of interest written all over it.
2. Jail terms should be determined at least partly by whether jail is effective. If jail has a 100% recidivism rate, what do we think we are accomplishing?
3. We might also think about making correction proportional to the damage done to society. A CEO who robs a million people of a trillion dollars of their life savings should not walk and have only to find a new job.
4. And what's with the refusal to release people when good DNA evidence says they are innocent?

That's enough to get me in serious trouble, so I'll stop. The better stuff out there should be discussed in preference to what I have suggested.

There you go, John, being constructive again. If ever a thread tempted me to use greasemonkey, it's this one. Jstan, or course, would never be on my hit list, though.

As one of the very few (I hope) in this forum who's actually been incarcerated, my "inside view" convinced me long ago that our sentencing laws need major work. Our sentencing for violating drug laws, in particular, lacks both justice and efficacy. I'm encouraged by the recognition by California voters that incarceration for first-time drug offenders forms an inferior option to alternative treatment.

I do know, however, that anyone who robs trillions, or merely millions of dollars from the public can expect to spend the rest of their life in custody, so I'm not sure about your CEO comment. Unless you equate making a bad business decision with robbery, your wish states existing law.

John
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 12:03pm PT
Part of the answer is to DROP the "Sides" thing and to work TOGETHER finding the best solution...

Agreed, but only if you agree that throwing down a pic like that latest "offering" was "heavy artillery" in the strongest sense, with clear intent to cause irreparable psychological damage; and that you'll never do anything like that again! ;-)
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 24, 2015 - 12:13pm PT

"5. Address mental health.
6. Address poverty.
7. Address racism and other hate speech. This may require giving up a few rights to freedom of speech, such as the rights we've given up toward combatting terrorism; but hey... isn't it already bordering on terrorism anyway?
8. Address drug manufacturing, dealing, and addiction. Legalize pot to much more extent than it is now. Not so much the rest of them. My opinion.
9. Pour more money into education. Give people the skills necessary to get a job, increase their quality of life, and boost our economy.
10. Healthcare. Sooo much to say about that. Cheaper, better, etc."

What's your meaning of "address"? Our government all ready addresses all these behaviors with the highest percentage of money to person ratio the world has ever seen. But like in the example of government directed public schools. History shows The more money we give the government to spend has been directly proportional with the decline in quality of education.

We shouldn't look to the government to be our only "holders of wisdom" with matters concerning the direction our behavior takes us. They are merely a referee! Just like in a basketball game, their presence should only be that of calling fouls. On issues like education, the "What's" and "How's" should bounced back and forth between differing opinions amongst The People. It should NOT be left up to the government!

These forums seem like the best way to get out everyone's opinions. Maybe we should start national forums for each and every issue? An Education forum could be filled with info on what's pertinent TO teach children in different age groups. And what are the best strategies FOR teaching the info.

Having these Forums would be the easiest way to get everyone involved, and would be educational to all :)
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 12:18pm PT
It would be wrong of me to agree to something that ISN'T going to happen...

Somehow I had a feeling that would be your answer.

At least you can tell the difference between right and wrong. Of course, the posting of that pic does raise the question! LOL
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 12:20pm PT
Why, that would be unthinkable.

No, just useless.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 12:29pm PT
By "address" I mean do more to reduce these problems. Education ranks high on my list, because when I look around...

I see stupid people.

Actually, I see people who are unprepared for life. They don't have basic job skills (math, English, speaking on coherent sentences, ya know?), and even less, specific job skills in any particular field. It makes me glad to see a trend happening now wherein public education is beginning to focus on offering technical skills in various fields at a high school level. Colleges are successfully expanding their technical trades as well, in addition to the general educational type of degrees. The biggest hurdle though, I suspect, is engaging students and getting them interested in these types of programs. Seems easier now, with more choices for them, as they are more likely to encounter an area of interest.
However, there is a definite need for financial aid in the form of both loans and grants, and probably more so in terms of grants. Low-income and poverty-stricken students just aren't terribly likely to take out, or even qualify for loans.

I'll relate to you that I hated high school with a passion. Took the GED and got out. Went back later, got an actual diploma, and took about the only class that interested me in college. Working full time just to live, and taking classes when I could afford them finally earned me an associate's, four years longer than it should have taken. It's been a good career; but never earned me much money, since I value other things in life more, like time with family and in the outdoors. Maybe I should have done it differently.
Now, I'm trying my hand at teaching, making less than I actually could in my chosen profession, because I'm hoping I can give back to the community this way AND contribute to making a difference in education by providing a quality education to those who need a valuable job skill.
That old adage about "those who can, do... those who can't, teach"? Maybe true in some cases; but you may change your tune if you have a class to teach some time. I don't mean tapping out a paper on why the figure 8 is better than the bowline, I mean creating a full-on program of QUALITY, where successful graduates will truly have and education, and an employable set of skills behind them. We need more of that. But the support simply isn't there, in part because people think education's just a waste of money, more government propaganda or some crap.

Does that help?
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 12:41pm PT
http://www.news.wisc.edu/21688

http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/06/sesame-street-preschool-education/396056/
Degaine

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 12:58pm PT
jonnyrig wrote:
That old adage about "those who can, do... those who can't, teach"?


First, good on you for teaching.

Second, anyone who pulls out that old adage on is both full of sh#t and doesn't know what the f*#k they're talking about.

The success of the human race has been from being able to pass down and build on information from one generation to the next. Those who teach have put in the time to gain the expertise to then pass on a skill to others.

Most teachers I know "did" within their subject expertise and then decided to teach, and I know plenty of people in both engineering and business who are both "doing" and "teaching".

Anyway, cheers.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 24, 2015 - 01:07pm PT
Registry, check.
Since most gun owners won't agree to a federally run registry, how about a federal mandate that each state have a gun registry and it must be open for cross reference for all states. I'd like to see the registry be more like the auto registration. You wold be required to file transfer of weapon for each each time it is resold and you would have to carry a small wallet sized registration card for each weapon you carry in public for proof of ownership. Should your weapon be stolen you would have to provide that info to state registries within a x amount of time. If your weapon shows up at a crime scene and you did not say it was lost, you'd be fined heavily and no longer able to possess a weapon.

Ammo, don't care to much on that one.

Start banning the sale of firearms that can hold more than seven rounds. Of course no fully auto either, but I believe they're already banned. The legal ones that are already out there stay.

One of the biggest things we could do is to get damn tough on violations of current laws, that would take a lot of push from both sides of the isle so I doubt that will pan out.

This is not going to stop a lot of gun crimes, so don't strawman every little situation. It's a start IMHO.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 24, 2015 - 01:20pm PT

Does that help?

Yeah I'm right with ya in spirit and experiences. But your asking for MORE money?

Californian's spent approx. 77 BILLION last year on 10,500 public schools.

Student population; 6,236,672

Roughly 12,200 spent on each child. In a class of 25, that's $300,000 !!!!!!!!!

And you need more money? How do you possible see more money making for higher quality?
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 01:22pm PT
Yes, clearly, voluntarily reducing the number of weapons on the market would have no effect on the availability of those now missing weapons for criminal use.

Clearly.... (blink, blink)

"Yes, clearly, voluntarily reducing the number of cars on the market would have no effect on the availability of those vehicles for idiotic use. Clearly.... (blink, blink)."

The texting woman on the road today sees herself as above and beyond the anti-texting law, she has no intention of obeying it, and the number of vehicles in her driveway/garage has no relevance to her misuse of the one she was driving irresponsibly and illegally.

The last two accidents I've been in, both times I was rear-ended. One totaled my car. In both cases, the drivers were uninsured and had no valid licence.

Did the cop take them away in cuffs? Of course not. In both cases, the cop issued a citation and told me I could sue (or my insurance company could, which declined). In both cases the drivers provided false addresses, and I could not sue because I could never serve them.

Would reducing the number of vehicles on the market have the slightest effect upon these drivers' determination to do whatever they feel, with utter disregard for the relevant laws (or their impact on other people)? Would reducing the number of vehicles make it less likely that these drivers are going to drive or that they are going to cause mayhem with their driving?

As long as people live in disregard for the rights of others, bad sh|t is going to happen. Laws or no laws. If you can't tumble to this FACT of life, then, seriously, nothing can be done for you.

Number of vehicles (uh, guns) is a totally irrelevant red herring. Responsible owners will use them responsibly; irresponsible and/or sick people WILL get them and use them badly.

Hey, while we're in the federal "reducing" game, let's reduce the quantity of drugs on the street! Maybe if we make federals laws and have a dedicated federal agency to enforce them, call it something like the "Drug Enforcement Agency," or something sporty like that....
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 24, 2015 - 01:37pm PT

Second, anyone who pulls out that old adage on is both full of sh#t and doesn't know what the f*#k they're talking about.

This kind of talk gets us nowhere but the outhouse ; (

That adage was started by people no longer able to do the physical work demanded within their industry.. My metal shop teacher started teaching after his fingers were cut off in an industrial accident.

And is your example of "Do'ers And Teachers" pertaining to public K-12, or College?

At my local elementary I would estimate half the teachers are there waiting retirement form the example I presented, while the other half are young'ins there as a stepping stone.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 01:39pm PT
Blue- switch careers to education, preferably at some inter-city disadvantaged neighborhood public institution, then get back to me.
Hell, go spend a day at one.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 24, 2015 - 01:39pm PT
White Supremacists More Dangerous To America Than Foreign Terrorists, Study Says

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/24/domestic-terrorism-charleston_n_7654720.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

The real problem is not just the guns, it's the Anti-Government, Racist, homophobic Right Wingers that are enabled and supported by the Right Wing Conservative Republicans and other Christian Patriot Groups.

We need to talk about the Republican Presidential candidates not being able to talk about the inherent problem with Republican Party being a far Right Wing extremist group itself. They either keep silent, or fan the flames so they won't upset their Base Voters.

They talk about having a civil war or a revolution on every issue they are wrong about.

The latest is Gay Marriage, they would rather fight to the death than surrender to the times.

The education needed is to expose these groups as a hate group and shut them down as terrorist thugs.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jun 24, 2015 - 01:49pm PT
Slavery’s Long Shadow

JUNE 22, 2015
Paul Krugman


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/22/opinion/paul-krugman-slaverys-long-shadow.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fpaul-krugman&_r=0

America is a much less racist nation than it used to be, and I’m not just talking about the still remarkable fact that an African-American occupies the White House. The raw institutional racism that prevailed before the civil rights movement ended Jim Crow is gone, although subtler discrimination persists. Individual attitudes have changed, too, dramatically in some cases. For example, as recently as the 1980s half of Americans opposed interracial marriage, a position now held by only a tiny minority.

Yet racial hatred is still a potent force in our society, as we’ve just been reminded to our horror. And I’m sorry to say this, but the racial divide is still a defining feature of our political economy, the reason America is unique among advanced nations in its harsh treatment of the less fortunate and its willingness to tolerate unnecessary suffering among its citizens.

Of course, saying this brings angry denials from many conservatives, so let me try to be cool and careful here, and cite some of the overwhelming evidence for the continuing centrality of race in our national politics.

My own understanding of the role of race in U.S. exceptionalism was largely shaped by two academic papers.

The first, by the political scientist Larry Bartels, analyzed the move of the white working class away from Democrats, a move made famous in Thomas Frank’s “What’s the Matter With Kansas?” Mr. Frank argued that working-class whites were being induced to vote against their own interests by the right’s exploitation of cultural issues. But Mr. Bartels showed that the working-class turn against Democrats wasn’t a national phenomenon — it was entirely restricted to the South, where whites turned overwhelmingly Republican after the passage of the Civil Rights Act and Richard Nixon’s adoption of the so-called Southern strategy.

And this party-switching, in turn, was what drove the rightward swing of American politics after 1980. Race made Reaganism possible. And to this day Southern whites overwhelmingly vote Republican, to the tune of 85 or even 90 percent in the deep South.

The second paper, by the economists Alberto Alesina, Edward Glaeser, and Bruce Sacerdote, was titled “Why Doesn’t the United States Have a European-style Welfare State?” Its authors — who are not, by the way, especially liberal — explored a number of hypotheses, but eventually concluded that race is central, because in America programs that help the needy are all too often seen as programs that help Those People: “Within the United States, race is the single most important predictor of support for welfare. America’s troubled race relations are clearly a major reason for the absence of an American welfare state.”

Now, that paper was published in 2001, and you might wonder if things have changed since then. Unfortunately, the answer is that they haven’t, as you can see by looking at how states are implementing — or refusing to implement — Obamacare.

For those who haven’t been following this issue, in 2012 the Supreme Court gave individual states the option, if they so chose, of blocking the Affordable Care Act’s expansion of Medicaid, a key part of the plan to provide health insurance to lower-income Americans. But why would any state choose to exercise that option? After all, states were being offered a federally-funded program that would provide major benefits to millions of their citizens, pour billions into their economies, and help support their health-care providers. Who would turn down such an offer?

The answer is, 22 states at this point, although some may eventually change their minds. And what do these states have in common? Mainly, a history of slaveholding: Only one former member of the Confederacy has expanded Medicaid, and while a few Northern states are also part of the movement, more than 80 percent of the population in Medicaid-refusing America lives in states that practiced slavery before the Civil War.

And it’s not just health reform: a history of slavery is a strong predictor of everything from gun control (or rather its absence), to low minimum wages and hostility to unions, to tax policy.

So will it always be thus? Is America doomed to live forever politically in the shadow of slavery?

I’d like to think not. For one thing, our country is growing more ethnically diverse, and the old black-white polarity is slowly becoming outdated. For another, as I said, we really have become much less racist, and in general a much more tolerant society on many fronts. Over time, we should expect to see the influence of dog-whistle politics decline.

But that hasn’t happened yet. Every once in a while you hear a chorus of voices declaring that race is no longer a problem in America. That’s wishful thinking; we are still haunted by our nation’s original sin.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 01:52pm PT
But if she voluntarily chose to sell her car yesterday she wouldn't have nearly hit you with it this morning,.. sounds like that would be a good recommendation to her anyway.

Agreed! But that's a different argument. You didn't ask for gun owners to give up ALL their guns. You said "voluntary reduction," which implies that they keep one or more of their otherwise (as some have called it) "huge stockpile."

If you're advocating that gun owners voluntarily give up ALL their guns, that would indeed be like you advocating that this texting woman give up her (only) car. No guns: no shooting anything; no cars: no (irresponsible) driving.

But, of course, THAT's not gonna happen!

So, we're back to "reduction" being a red herring.

The problem is that the people that most need to have guns/cars taken away from them will still manage to get them. Make any object illegal for which there is a robust market, and you only serve to create a black market for that object.

You might succeed in making that object more expensive, but you won't "reduce" its availability. And the darkness of the market, coupled with the increased expense, then in turn fuels gangland activities and vast amounts of surrounding/related crime, including property crime and robbery to feed the increased costs.

We now have plenty of historical evidence across every type of society and political structure (from Communist USSR to the USA) to know how this game works.

And thank you for the expression of concern. Seriously, incidents like this remind me how quickly a "normal" and "safe" drive to the office can very suddenly get ugly and even live-changing (or ending).
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 24, 2015 - 01:57pm PT
Canada's gun laws are far from perfect; however, hand guns are extremely closely restricted.

To he best of my knowledge, there are NO concealed carry permits for civilians. Also, the last time I checked, we aren't under the jackboot heel of an unelected dictator - although I've got to admit that our constipated stoat of a Prime Minister does indeed have delusions of grandeur.

Not surprisingly, he's the Canadian equivalent of a Republican.
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Jun 24, 2015 - 01:59pm PT
Ron said
what about the pure fact that with increased gun ownership in the USA, the murder rates have gone down?
A true fact on it's own. However very misleading as the rate of all serious crimes have fallen in the same period.
And fallen faster than the gun death rate!
Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.

http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/05/07/gun-homicide-rate-down-49-since-1993-peak-public-unaware/
and
The firearm suicide rate (6.3 per 100,000 people) is higher than the firearm homicide rate and has come down less sharply. The number of gun suicide deaths (19,392 in 2010) outnumbered gun homicides, as has been true since at least 1981.
I have known 3 people who killed themselves with firearms. The first in 1981. Two of them were friends.

More guns doesn't make anyone safer.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 02:18pm PT
You're just nitpicking me dude.

I really don't think that I am. There is an important distinction between "reduce" and "eliminate." You have always seemed to me to be someone not advocating "eliminate," but your talking about the woman not have any car to drive equates to "eliminate." That's not nit-picking. We're really talking about whether or not "reducing" is relevant, and I continue to state that "reducing" the number of vehicles this woman owns (as long as the number remains one or more) has ZERO effect upon whether or not she is a responsible driver.

By the same token, the number of guns owned (as long as each owner has one or more) has ZERO effect on whether that owner is safe and responsible.

And "reducing" the number in circulation "down" to the point that would be "few" enough of them to "reduce" the number that criminals can get will only boost the black market supply and increase cost. Again, we have ample historical evidence to know how this game works.

I enjoined your discussion in the spirit of your request. The 'gun nuts' (for jrig, I quoted that because madbolter1 used the term in the post to which I responded, but please, cry on my sleeve anyway! I need to clean my glasses) CAN work together to reduce the supply of weaponry. They can!

Wait. Now who's getting emotional? You can assert "they CAN" until the cows come home, but the "reduction" argument simply doesn't work (see above).

Take a deep breath, divorce your emotional reaction that you have to defend each and every point, and just ... think... about what I am suggesting.

Right back at ya. I don't think I'm being "emotional," and I'm sure you don't think that you are. I don't find the "reduction" argument plausible in the slightest, for reason (not emotional outbursts) given above.

There are some NRA folk who think the answer is MORE guns. They celebrate the ever increasing ratio of gun ownership and tout, as if in celebration, the ever increasing number of firearms in total.

I'm not among them, nor is anybody with whom I associate. That said, I believe that the NUMBER (increased or reduced) is in itself irrelevant.

Begin to build a restrained approach to the celebration of our 2nd amendment rights!

I LOVE the sound of that, and I sincerely mean that. Of course, the devil's in the details, and the sentence will mean wildly different things to different people.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 02:23pm PT
More guns doesn't make anyone safer.

"Less" guns doesn't either.

You either BAN them altogether, or you are right where we are now. People keep telling me that nobody on this thread is advocating an outright ban.

Good, because in this nation, banning won't work.

So, any real-world solutions will have to build in the FACT of broad-scale gun ownership and carrying.

Real-world solutions will have to really study the underlying (not band-aid) causes of violence in general and seek to resolve those problems.

And NO such solutions will save us from the likes of this latest sicko. In a free society, such whack jobs WILL emerge and have their way with us. That is one of the prices we pay to live in the land of the free and the home of the brave.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 02:24pm PT
Cheers :)

Cheers indeed. Great day to you.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 24, 2015 - 03:11pm PT

Blue- switch careers to education, preferably at some inter-city disadvantaged neighborhood public institution, then get back to me.

OK I'm back! I don't understand what your intention is that I learn? I've spent atleast 1 day a month in all my daughters classes from K-3 watching and helping the teachers. And I'm pretty sure JTree is amongst the poorest towns not just of Cali, but the whole US? As for bike paths Pffft, we can't even afford sidewalks! Grass for kids to run on. None!
Workbooks for the kids, naw, photocopies from the teachers. Music class, none. Art supplies, parents supply the crayons. PE is twice a week for 30mins. No balls, no sport equip. I actually supplied the only ball for my daughters class.

So I do have a little experience.

And I am taking your advice by taking classes at CC to get my credentials : )
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 24, 2015 - 07:42pm PT
In the spirit of creating talking points to get rid of the plague of handguns, here's a few suggestions that could at least be considered, and are offered in good faith:

-Possession of unregistered handguns (and any other firearms for that matter) AFTER an amnesty period shall be considered to be a felony.

This amnesty would not apply to firearms already used to commit a felony.

-Possession of registered handguns will continue to be legal.

-After a designated period of time, all concealed carry permits will be revoked.

-A generous buy back program shall be implemented to buy back handguns and any legally owned automatic weapons from their owners.

-The use of firearms to commit a crime will continue to be a crime - a Federal crime.

Perhaps these aren't perfect suggestions for legislation but, if implemented, they would bring U.S. gun laws into a comparable parity with other advanced industrial democracies.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 24, 2015 - 07:51pm PT
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.

Jun 23, 2015 - 02:20pm PT
Dylann Roof is a Devout Conservative Christian


His Manifesto sites that his inspiration is from the Council Of Conservative Citizens, A CONSERVATIVE Christian Group that want America to become a Christian Theocracy

By your logic, all ST posters are big wall climbers.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 24, 2015 - 08:02pm PT
^^^Pfffft. What'cha ya gonna do about the 15 unregistered ones I got buried in the back yard?

I'm a felon. So I don't give a dang about any registering. "Badges, we don't need no stink'in badges!" Lol

If I wanted to kill ya, I could kill ya. You all are just talk'in out the side of your mouths. Lol

I can buy an unregistered gun faster then you can buy a registered one. How you gonna curtail the black market?
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 24, 2015 - 08:27pm PT
BLUEBLOCR: By happily tossing you into Federal prison. There'd be plenty of room there after we freed all the non-violent offenders when we acknowledged the dismal failure of The War on Drugs.

And with the $1 TRILLION dollars that have been saved, there might even be funds available to help you learn that people are on planet Earth for only a short time, and death is forever.

Grow up. Consider the misery unleashed by armed wingnuts upon innocent human beings and hang your head in shame.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 24, 2015 - 09:46pm PT
Rdog: Gee.. I guess it depends upon what Tea Party Web Site you're using.

According to the Floria Department of Law Enforcement, the violent death rate actually skyrocketed after they enacted the "hold your ground" laws.

The "y" axis in your graph was upside down, you bloody fool.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 09:46pm PT
Is it just me, or did anyone else notice the add banner?
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 24, 2015 - 09:59pm PT
There'd be plenty of room there after we freed all the non-violent offenders when we acknowledged the dismal failure of The War on Drugs.

SWEET! So we abandon the "dismal failure of the War on Drugs" after having abandoned a dismal failure of the War on Hard Liquor, only to follow it all up with a brand new War on Guns!

SWEET! Double SWEET!

I predict more gangs and a fresh black market on unregistered firearms. Oh, and a dismal failure of the War on Guns.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 24, 2015 - 10:01pm PT
Well Stewart I gave you a for instance of what's real and you just walk away.
Do you really think your restrictions are gonna curtail the thugs in LA from getting weapons?
They don't have to down to Big5 and register for a gun. Alot of them don't even have ID. No, there's lots of exvet militaristic rebels out there who have been buying guns and grinding off the numbers to sell for profit. And those stockpiles will last for a long time.

Sorry bud your not gonna make a peaceful society by writing more laws.

What's your next guess?
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 24, 2015 - 10:42pm PT
madbolter & BLUEBLOCR: Well, at least you'd be in jail with them, BLUEBLOCR, so that would be an improvement right there.

Since neither one of you seem to have developed the capacity to actually think, let me repeat what should have been obvious from my earlier post:

I suggested no "War" on anyone who has a legitimate need and/or lawful use for firearms. People can keep their guns if they use them responsibly.

My comments were clearly intended to begin a search for a solution to the evil of irresponsible firearm use in the U.S. and there isn't a word that I'm aware of of posting that doesn't fall squarely in line with laws that (to my knowledge) exist in EVERY other advanced industrialized democracy on planet Earth.

When it comes to responsible use of firearms among these nations, the U.S. comes in last.

On the other hand, the U.S. leads in the way it abuses visible minorities and the poor in general.

Perhaps if you pinheads would agree that a few more social programs for the needy might be a good idea, then those gangs in L.A. and elsewhere might not be as quick on the trigger. Maybe, maybe not - but I suspect a significant percentage would consider a generous cash reward for surrendering their guns to be an attractive prospect.

If I WAS going to suggest a declaration of war on any group of people, the suppliers of illegal firearms would be at the top of the list, and the jail terms would be draconian.

Tax the rich fairly if you need more money. Once upon a time those parasites actually paid a relatively fair share of their income.
Degaine

climber
Jun 24, 2015 - 11:11pm PT
Blueblocr
That adage was started by people no longer able to do the physical work demanded within their industry.

I did not know that. Honestly, thanks.

That written, the adage today is clearly used as an insult. Has been for quite some time. For example, during 2011 teachers' protest in Wisconsin, the adage was thrown around on an offline always in an derogatory manner.

Cheers.
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 24, 2015 - 11:58pm PT
^^^ really? When I read his story about having to change professions, I didn't recognize his use as an insult. No biggie. But if he's becoming a teacher why put it down


You seem not so swift at reading either. I never said you put him down reread my post.
As for his meaning, and your meaning, take how you want Negative Nellie : (
Vvvvvvvv v v vvvvvvvv v
Degaine

climber
Jun 25, 2015 - 01:37am PT
Blueblocr,

You have serious reading comprehension problems.

One, I didn't put him down. Reread my post.

Two, in jonnyrig's post he clearly understands that today the expression is used as an insult.

madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 25, 2015 - 02:03am PT
Since neither one of you seem to have developed the capacity to actually think, let me repeat what should have been obvious from my earlier post:

ROFL! Yeah, me with my Ph.D. in analytical philosophy and all. Yeah, thinking is the one thing I've never developed ANY capacity for! Yeah, they just hand those degrees out to any stupid "pinhead" who requests one. Bwahahahah.

I suggested no "War" on anyone who has a legitimate need and/or lawful use for firearms.

No, you stated a War on GUNS (not people), and you can't seem to make the connection with other (as YOU yourself said) "dismal failures" of other Wars on other desirable products.

You might manage to throw some people in prison, just like the War on Drugs has managed. You might manage to burn through billions of dollars, just like the other "dismal failures." But you WILL NOT keep mass quantities of illegal guns out of the hands of countless criminals who will only have an increased desire to obtain them.

This will be yet another "dismal failure" of the government to keep a desirable product out of the hands of ANYBODY who wants it.

Good luck with that!

People can keep their guns if they use them responsibly.

Oh, you mean "use them as you determine they shall"? You've already said, "No concealed carry," so you've already destroyed your credibility regarding "responsible use," because millions of Americans presently carry concealed and you don't even know it because they DO "use them responsibly" in a way you have stated you would disallow.

My comments were clearly intended to begin a search for a solution to the evil of irresponsible firearm use in the U.S.

You are not "searching for a solution." There are some here that are, but you have given exactly zero evidence that you are among them.

You are hell-bent on "fixing" things in exactly the way they cannot be fixed, with a superficial, draconian approach that has already repeatedly been proven to not work in the USA.

You don't care to do the hard work of figuring out the motivations of violence and racism and seeking nuanced and comprehensive approaches to resolving the causes of these foundations of "gun violence."

and there isn't a word that I'm aware of of posting that doesn't fall squarely in line with laws that (to my knowledge) exist in EVERY other advanced industrialized democracy on planet Earth.

What people like you can't seem to get your mind around is that we are NOT like "every other advanced industrialized democracy on planet Earth!" We were not supposed to be, and even with our long history of falling away from the founding principles, we are still a long way from being the subdued, authority-cowed communitarians that the rest of the "civilized" world is. And what you cannot grasp is that that is a GOOD thing!

Especially the Canadians telling us how great it is to be sheeple in Canada crack me up. I love Canadians! But them telling us how to become a democracy just like them is about as motivating to me as having somebody suggest that I start pounding on my body parts with a crag hammer... pick end, of course.

When you can finally quit comparing us with "EVERY other advanced industrialized democracy on planet Earth," and you finally start talking about real life as it is in the USA, you MAY finally start to think seriously about what solutions are applicable HERE, in accordance with the principles that make us unique and great.

When it comes to responsible use of firearms among these nations, the U.S. comes in last.

That tripe has been endlessly repeated, yet repetition doesn't make it true. Furthermore, we have WAY worse problems in the US than to start another "dismal failure" of some War on some other desirable product!

Everyone goes all glassy-eyed when talking about auto accidents, like "There is no comparison between accidents and intentional murders," but that's ridiculous if your motivation REALLY is to get serious about needless and PREVENTABLE carnage!

According to nhtsa.gov (http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/812154.pdf), there were 32,719 traffic fatalities in 2013, of which 1,149 were children aged 14 and under! That's some serious carnage!

And that doesn't even hold a candle to the injuries and maiming. 172,000 kids were injured in traffic accidents, many bearing permanent damage.

Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death in ages 15 to 29, according to the World Health Organization.

The major causes of traffic accidents, according to the WHO? Drunk and distracted driving. "Drivers using a mobile phone are approximately four times more likely to be involved in a crash than when a driver does not use a phone."

And most states have made this practice illegal, yet I see it constantly as I'm driving. Constantly. My estimate in Colorado is at least 70% of drivers are talking on the phone or texting while they drive. It's like bumper-cars out there, and these drivers don't give a rip about the law on this subject.

Two good friends of mine are permanently brain-damaged thanks to a drunk driver who it now appears will not even go to jail! But, there was no "fatality," so it's no big deal compared to the (gasp!) "epidemic of GUN violence!"

Look, you want to wring your hands and go after an epidemic, one about which you can REALLY address some sickening statistics? Go after drunk and distracted drivers! Reduce the carnage by hundreds of thousands per year, and you still won't be down near the "epidemic of gun violence."

Yeah, it's SO much better to be killed or brain damaged in an auto "accident" (really CAUSED by intentional negligence) than to be shot! SO much better.

But, wait! It's ALREADY illegal to drive drunk and/or distracted. So HOW are these hundreds of thousands of terrible accidents happening EVERY year?

According to NHTSA again (http://www.rmiia.org/auto/traffic_safety/Cost_of_crashes.asp), "U.S. motor vehicle crashes in 2010 cost almost $1 trillion in loss of productivity and loss of life. "

"In 2012 there were 5,419,000 police-reported motor vehicle traffic crashes." (Yes, that's OVER 5-MILLION crashes!) These accidents resulted in 2.36 MILLION injuries significant enough to require medical attention.

And those numbers do not differentiate between "minor" injuries that will heal and severe injuries (like my friends') that are lifelong but that don't count toward the (apparently) all-important DEATH TOLL!

So, while you're wringing your hands about the "epidemic of gun violence" and how we need to stomp all over the rights of responsible citizens, why don't you get worked up over the REAL carnage taking place every day in this nation?

Oh, right, because the "causes" are already covered by laws, so there's nothing we can do. Yeah right.

The same can be said about guns!

People like you are NOT motivated BY the carnage. You have a fixation on a particular object that you find odious, and "something has to be done about that!" You have no similar fixation on cars, so orders of magnitude MORE CARNAGE is just fine with you, as long as a negligent driver in a CAR is the cause of it. But let a GUN (oh, gasp!) appear in the mix, and it's a national crisis!!!

Look, I GET that when a sicko kills nine people with a gun, that's a terrible, terrible tragedy; and when it's racially motivated, it's downright disgusting! No debate there.

But you are NOT going to solve that sort of problem. And the use of the GUN just is not the issue in the case!

Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of people just like my friends are getting permanently injured or killed by drunks and INTENTIONALLY negligent drivers, and THAT apparently doesn't fill you with ANY horror nor motivation to "do something" about it.

On the other hand, the U.S. leads in the way it abuses visible minorities and the poor in general.

Oh, gag! Please stop with the bleeding-heart, liberal garbage! The USA spends more money to "address the plight" of the "poor and downtrodden" than many other comparable nations combined! It is SO easy to get free education and free opportunities in this nation! ANYBODY who really wants to make it in this nation can. Period. The era of "poor, downtrodden minorities" has been long-over, and I am sick to death of hearing the endless excuse of how we have to (somehow) even MORE "level the playing field."

Yes, there is still racism in this country. There is "reverse racism" as well. Lots of it! And we have "compensated" until it's become ridiculous. Another social program is NOT the answer!

Perhaps if you pinheads

And THERE is your typical stock in trade: When you can't convince with your lame and superficial "arguments," you resort to insulting your opponent's intelligence.

would agree that a few more social programs for the needy might be a good idea, then those gangs in L.A. and elsewhere might not be as quick on the trigger.

Really? Are you serious? I mean, REALLY???

As a nation and as individual states we have POURED vast, VAST amounts of money into EXACTLY the "programs" you are suggesting. I was born and raised in the VERY poverty you talk about (without understanding), and I was born into the era in which my (terrible) whiteness PRECLUDED ME from getting the helping hand that my neighbors of color could get.

THEY could get an absolutely FREE ride through school, if they could be bothered to TAKE it! They couldn't be bothered, yet I PAID my way through school and went into debt because I valued it.

I was then repeatedly denied jobs and opportunities for which I had PAID to become qualified... again because of my great and terrible whiteness.

While still in college, I begged my friends (both of and not of color) to come with me to the financial aid office and get into school, but it was always another night of partying and always another excuse why they just couldn't get around to it. So, pop out another kid or two, increase the welfare check, and then moan and snivel about how "downtrodden" they were!

I've BEEN there. I've SEEN it first-hand, and NOBODY is going to convince me that ANOTHER social program is "the answer." Give it a rest. It's been done in spades and then some. At some point, people CHOOSE their level based upon their WILL and character, and all the helping hands in the world are not going to raise them beyond that level they have CHOSEN.

Yeah, I know, there will be howls of outrage about me "blaming the victim" yet again. Don't bother. It rolls off of me like water off a duck's back. I've LIVED it. This is not theory for me. I've been IN education almost my whole life, and I know first-hand how the "social program" game works. So, don't waste your time trying to "shame" me into ignoring the vast evidence I've seen my entire life.

MOST of these "downtrodden" people are NOT victims! With RARE exception, there ALREADY IS some social program that would GIVE them a leg up that I could never get due to my abominable white maleness. MOST of these people are living out their OWN choices and priorities.

Maybe, maybe not - but I suspect a significant percentage would consider a generous cash reward for surrendering their guns to be an attractive prospect.

Oh

my

goodness!

Oh, wow. I'm speechless!

If I WAS going to suggest a declaration of war on any group of people, the suppliers of illegal firearms would be at the top of the list, and the jail terms would be draconian.

You mean like the War on the "big fish" of the drug trade?

Yeah, the jury's IN on these Wars on "the suppliers." Good luck with another War. Just don't ask me to pay for it.

Tax the rich fairly if you need more money. Once upon a time those parasites actually paid a relatively fair share of their income.

Wait! Somebody is a "parasite" just because they are "rich" (whatever is that threshold in YOUR mind)?

And the "fair share" would be EXACTLY what (in your mind)?

And by what PRINCIPLE would you determine that "fairness"?

If you want a FAIR approach to taxation, go back to what our founders thought of when they referred to "taxes and tariffs." They had something like what we now think of as sales taxes in mind, NEVER income taxes! And there are principled reasons for that distinction that were abandoned in 1913.

You want a FAIR approach to taxation, get OUT of the income tax business! Instead, have a national sales tax, with exemptions for basic needs, luxury taxes on luxury items, and special taxes on vice items. That way the truly poor are not taxed AT ALL, while the rich pay heavily to enjoy their luxurious lifestyle. If you can afford a $1-million yacht, you can afford to pay $500,000 more in luxury tax. The details of such a plan would not be hard to hash out to be truly fair to everybody, and then you'd have a tax plan in place that would encourage economic growth, savings, and investment.

Meanwhile, get OUT of the business of the government actually owning all property, because with property taxes they can tax you out of a house that you otherwise own outright (it's literally happening broadcast in the Chicago area). When you DO own something, you OWN it. End of story. The government should have NO means to take it away from you apart from a lawful seizure due to your property-related criminal activity. That is a basic constitutional principle that we now take for GRANTED does not exist anymore. Absurd!

But nooooo! You won't advocate for anything truly fair. Let's keep the bloated and above-the-law IRS, and let's keep arbitrarily taxing "the rich" (that threshold is ridiculously low!) while treating the whole game as flat-out "wealth redistribution." Let's keep Americans struggling with thousands of pages of inconsistent and indecipherable tax codes that require us to spend hundreds of billions every year to have a HOPE of being legal and perhaps surviving an audit.

If you want REAL solutions, you are barking up entirely the wrong trees.

But don't listen to ME! I'm just a "pinhead" after all.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 25, 2015 - 09:59am PT
OK I'm back! I don't understand what your intention is that I learn? I've spent atleast 1 day a month in all my daughters classes from K-3 watching and helping the teachers. And I'm pretty sure JTree is amongst the poorest towns not just of Cali, but the whole US? As for bike paths Pffft, we can't even afford sidewalks! Grass for kids to run on. None!
Workbooks for the kids, naw, photocopies from the teachers. Music class, none. Art supplies, parents supply the crayons. PE is twice a week for 30mins. No balls, no sport equip. I actually supplied the only ball for my daughters class.


It should be apparent to you that your children are not getting the opportunities for education that others are getting in richer neighborhoods. I'm of the opinion that funding should be based on student count vs property tax. What better way to deny education in poor communities than that? Education should be equal opportunity.

If you (generalization) don't think so, then STFU about gangs, drugs, and poor communities, 'cause you're helping to keep them right there, by keeping them stupid.

A generous buy back program shall be implemented to buy back handguns and any legally owned automatic weapons from their owners.

Buyback programs have successfully removed quite a number of both legal and illegal weapons from the street. If you're opposed to such programs, consider that many of these could have been the very weapons you would otherwise be concerned about their possible criminal use.

I can buy an unregistered gun faster then you can buy a registered one. How you gonna curtail the black market?

This is the central problem for all gun control. Law-abiding citizens end up enduring the scrutiny of the law, while criminals do whatever the hell they want, and money talks. Same as drugs. If there's a market, there will be a supplier. Come down hard on the violators (dealers specifically), and combine it with incentive programs like the no-questions-asked buybacks to entice voluntary removal of illicit weapons from the streets.

there's lots of exvet militaristic rebels out there who have been buying guns and grinding off the numbers to sell for profit. And those stockpiles will last for a long time.
Why bother with felony alteration of a serial number? Idiots. Did you know it's entirely legal to purchase a complete firearm via mail-order? Some machine work necessary. It's called an 80%. The serialized portion is not completed, and you have to finish it yourself. In some jurisdictions, you are not even required to serialize the weapon. You can buy it on the web, along with every other non-serialized part, and the ammo, and have it all shipped to your door without an FFL ever being involved. Legal even in the great restrictive state of California. I bet that's gonna change! Fortunately, this tends to be the stomping grounds of the hobbyist, and not the criminal. Most criminals don't have the wherewithal to do that kind of crap; because... well... they're generally poor and uneducated, right???

I suggested no "War" on anyone who has a legitimate need and/or lawful use for firearms. People can keep their guns if they use them responsibly.

Except that you advocate for the removal of entire classes of currently legal firearms. Kinda contradictory to this statement, don't ya think?

really? When I read his story about having to change professions, I didn't recognize his use as an insult. No biggie. But if he's becoming a teacher why put it down

It's generally used as an insult, and my use of it was to point out that people think teachers are incapable of doing their jobs. There are some bad educators out there, and there are some truly dedicated individuals who are trying to positively influence the world. We need more of the latter; but my point is that most people can make a hell of a lot more money by working in the field they know than by teaching others to do the same, so we're not attracting the ones best suited to teach. The incentive isn't there, besides wanting to give back. Ever here the old adage "you get what you pay for"? Well, we don't pay teachers much.

Oh, gag! Please stop with the bleeding-heart, liberal garbage! The USA spends more money to "address the plight" of the "poor and downtrodden" than many other comparable nations combined! It is SO easy to get free education and free opportunities in this nation! ANYBODY who really wants to make it in this nation can. Period. The era of "poor, downtrodden minorities" has been long-over, and I am sick to death of hearing the endless excuse of how we have to (somehow) even MORE "level the playing field."

That's your impression, and you point to many of the people as making the CHOICE to be there. Look, education starts at preschool, right? So, are you blaming children for "choosing to be there" or are you blaming their parents? Don't you think we could do better for the kids by improving their opportunity for education? Cause if you're saying they have the same opportunities as a rich white suburban kid, you're full of sh#t.

As a nation and as individual states we have POURED vast, VAST amounts of money into EXACTLY the "programs" you are suggesting. I was born and raised in the VERY poverty you talk about (without understanding), and I was born into the era in which my (terrible) whiteness PRECLUDED ME from getting the helping hand that my neighbors of color could get.

THEY could get an absolutely FREE ride through school, if they could be bothered to TAKE it! They couldn't be bothered, yet I PAID my way through school and went into debt because I valued it.

I was then repeatedly denied jobs and opportunities for which I had PAID to become qualified... again because of my great and terrible whiteness.

While still in college, I begged my friends (both of and not of color) to come with me to the financial aid office and get into school, but it was always another night of partying and always another excuse why they just couldn't get around to it. So, pop out another kid or two, increase the welfare check, and then moan and snivel about how "downtrodden" they were!

I've BEEN there. I've SEEN it first-hand, and NOBODY is going to convince me that ANOTHER social program is "the answer." Give it a rest. It's been done in spades and then some. At some point, people CHOOSE their level based upon their WILL and character, and all the helping hands in the world are not going to raise them beyond that level they have CHOSEN.

Yeah, I know, there will be howls of outrage about me "blaming the victim" yet again. Don't bother. It rolls off of me like water off a duck's back. I've LIVED it. This is not theory for me. I've been IN education almost my whole life, and I know first-hand how the "social program" game works. So, don't waste your time trying to "shame" me into ignoring the vast evidence I've seen my entire life.

MOST of these "downtrodden" people are NOT victims! With RARE exception, there ALREADY IS some social program that would GIVE them a leg up that I could never get due to my abominable white maleness. MOST of these people are living out their OWN choices and priorities.

Maybe, maybe not - but I suspect a significant percentage would consider a generous cash reward for surrendering their guns to be an attractive prospect.

Oh

my

goodness!

Oh, wow. I'm speechless!

Again, buyback programs have removed a lot of guns off the street. Maybe you could explain your opposition?

As to education, I'll grant you there are plenty of people that make bad choices, but to say everyone has equal opportunity, or an equal degree of education available to them simply isn't true. Yes, there's financial aid available, and yes, it's more available to not-the-average-white-male; but I believe we're losing students long before they ever even reach post-secondary education. I paid my own way through college too, being an average white male and all that. Just didn't go as far as you did. Kudos to you. Sorry your experience has led you to believe that our social programs are a waste. There are probably changes we could make to alleviate some of the abuse, and maybe provide better incentives to getting some skills and getting off the assistance; but I honestly haven't given it enough research to make a valid proposal there. I do, however, recognize the need to alter the status quo. Your taxation proposal seems intriguing.
dirtbag

climber
Jun 25, 2015 - 10:13am PT
150 years later we are still fighting the Civil War.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 25, 2015 - 10:20am PT
Learn to drive. One of the better ways to increase your personal survival rate.
[Click to View YouTube Video]
dirtbag

climber
Jun 25, 2015 - 10:26am PT
I love the Canadians' quaint, folksy accent!












(This oughta get my ass kicked. ;-) )
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 25, 2015 - 11:33am PT
Again, buyback programs have removed a lot of guns off the street. Maybe you could explain your opposition?

First, buyback programs typically pay a small fraction of the gun's original purchase price. You couldn't pay me $500 for my $1,200 gun, even if I had some vague inclination to get rid of it, so such a program isn't motivating the average person to "unload" their guns.

Second, the "lot of guns" you refer to can be summed up by this article (and there are countless others just like it): https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2014/02/12/success-gun-buyback-program-debated/PsITjPCyPkrG9C7fFr979O/story.html. Quote: "But the episode is a stark illustration of what specialists say is now a widely accepted failing of buyback programs: Even when they bring in impressive stockpiles of firearms, they rarely get the ones most sought by law enforcement."

And, "'Unfortunately, there is no compelling evidence that gun buyback programs are an effective crime-fighting tool or that they reduce the rates of crime,' said Jon Vernick, co-director of Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research."

Finally, the guns criminals are using are not obtained through the same "channels" as the are the guns the minority of citizens are turning in during buyback programs. So it's a VERY vaguely true adage that buybacks are "getting guns off of the streets." Really, they are not. They are getting (a relatively tiny few) guns off of the highest, dusty bookshelf or some such place where they had basically been forgotten about.

It's just another "great idea" that has people feeling all warm and fuzzy but that doesn't have any demonstrable effect on the actual problem.

As to education, I'll grant you there are plenty of people that make bad choices, but to say everyone has equal opportunity, or an equal degree of education available to them simply isn't true.

The notion of "opportunity" is an impossibly moving target! And social programs that are traditionally very blunt weapons wielded against subtle and vastly complicated combinations of causes have been recognized as quite ineffective. Here is just one example:

As http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2853053/ says, "Parental educational level is an important predictor of children’s educational and behavioral outcomes." Research consistently shows that when parents are educated and/OR encourage their kids to value education, those children are motivated to get educated and tend to succeed.

You can't just throw money at financial aid, headstart programs, no child left behind, and so on and so on! "Programs" do NOT offset entrenched perspectives or cultural norms.

Just thinking off the top of my head, if you want to have another "program" or pour more money into "education" (writ large), perhaps a few billion could be spent on endlessly blanketing the media with a genuine educational campaign about the values of education itself. Show kids of all races and classes succeeding.

Not just "academically" but in trades as well. So-called "blue color" trades are extremely honorable and incredibly necessary! These should receive ongoing public recognition and outright honor. I'd love to see a 60-second spot on the plumber that just fixed my hot water heater. The breadth and depth of what that guy KNEW was amazing to me. There was nothing simple or straightforward about diagnosing and then fixing the problem. Snippets of our conversation could be very motivational to some young person who's thinking about potential trades.

In general, our media glorifies sports figures and criminals. I won't even say the NAME of this latest sicko, because I won't contribute in ANY tiny way to his name coming up in search results. The media should offer the barest of reports about the incident and then relegate this whack job to the dustbin of obscurity, rather than to give him the fame and glory he actually was seeking.

Every moment spent glorifying this sicko could instead by bought up and used to glorify the average working Jane and Joe, magnifying their contributions to their communities and the value of their work.

Just a thought off the top of my head, but I do think that a different perspective needs to be offered to and instilled in cultures and communities that traditionally do not value education. Until the families themselves can be touched and motivated, the cycle of uneducation will continue.


Yes, there's financial aid available, and yes, it's more available to not-the-average-white-male; but I believe we're losing students long before they ever even reach post-secondary education.

POINT!

See above, and perhaps we can actually talk about how to address this critical and subtle underlying cause of violence!

Sorry your experience has led you to believe that our social programs are a waste.

I didn't mean to give that impression. I'm not saying they are all a "waste." What I'm saying is that they are not sufficient conditions for solving the problems they seek to solve. They are heavy-handed, blunt instrument approaches to extremely subtle and multi-layered problems.

And I'm not even suggesting utterly disbanding them! I'm suggesting that we need to be much more penetrating and sensitive in our analysis of the contributing causes of culture and perspective, and we need to get serious about educating people on the vast value of being educated.

As my own experience with my many friends shows, you can't JUST grease the skids! You have to break a cycle of lack of motivation, so that people actually find the end-point motivating enough to get on the track in the first place.

And all that said, you are STILL only going to reach a subset of the available population. I'm thinking of my closest friend during those years, and I am now (decades of thinking about him later) convinced that absolutely nothing can offset the draw of partying and irresponsible sexual behavior. This guy chose "sex, drugs, and rock and roll (listening)" over every other personal value. Continually wasted, perpetually with some new chick, popping out kids right and left, and always just "hanging around" with nothing to do but fire up another doob, this guy had CHOSEN to devote himself to a purely hedonistic, instant-gratification lifestyle.

That instant-gratification mindset is a very, very deep pit; and it's mighty hard to climb out of it once you're in there! People love their instant-gratification to varying degrees, but success and accomplishment require literally the opposite choices and values.

How are such long-term-perspective values taught? Ahh, there's the rub and the catch-22. And THAT is why the brute-force approach social programs tend to take is not a panacea.

You've gotta somehow change a whole subculture and perspective. That means infusing communities with genuine hope, and that does not mean hope in another handout or greased skid. It means hope and non-cynical belief in a path to a genuinely better life. HOW does the GOVERNMENT teach that?

I don't know, and I don't believe that anybody does. I don't believe that the research has even been done to offer comprehensive suggestions. Articles like the one I cited above just show what a catch-22 the problem is!
dirtbag

climber
Jun 25, 2015 - 12:01pm PT
MB I hope you view this post as constructive criticism, but honestly, your posts are way too long. I don't have time to read all that, even though I often think you have interesting things to say.
jonnyrig

climber
Jun 25, 2015 - 12:02pm PT
I didn't mean to give that impression. I'm not saying they are all a "waste." What I'm saying is that they are not sufficient conditions for solving the problems they seek to solve. They are heavy-handed, blunt instrument approaches to extremely subtle and multi-layered problems.

And I'm not even suggesting utterly disbanding them! I'm suggesting that we need to be much more penetrating and sensitive in our analysis of the contributing causes of culture and perspective, and we need to get serious about educating people on the vast value of being educated.

As my own experience with my many friends shows, you can't JUST grease the skids! You have to break a cycle of lack of motivation, so that people actually find the end-point motivating enough to get on the track in the first place.

Thanks for the clarification. I'd say we're in agreement then.

I don't know, and I don't believe that anybody does. I don't believe that the research has even been done to offer comprehensive suggestions. Articles like the one I cited above just show what a catch-22 the problem is!

Maybe some research would be a good start.

Re: buybacks. I saw that article awhile back. Basically, inconclusive. So, your point is it's a waste of time and money. And yet, you wouldn't mind, and would possibly even support expansion of background checks... which effectively have only about a 0.6% denial rate?

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/nics/reports/2011-operations-report/operations-report-2011

I don't know, man. Seems like spending a little money on a buyback program is better than weapons bans. As far as which guns it takes in, I'm not at all bothered that maybe these are guns just sitting around houses unused. Maybe that alone helps reduce the number of accidents, which are nearly as oft quoted by the anti-gun crowd as the violent crimes. It makes sense that the truly violent offenders are least likely to dump their weapons, so I wouldn't much expect those to be showing up anyway. Never made that claim, just pointing out that it does, in fact, reduce the number of firearms by a small percentage. Exactly what the anti-gun lobby is hoping for. At zero impact to the law-abiding citizen besides maybe a little tax money. Seems like a pretty fair trade. Feel free to oppose it, though, if you think there's no benefit to it. If, per Rdog, some 60% are operational, I'll take that. Even 40%. A saturday night special will kill you just as dead as thousand dollar Kahr.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 25, 2015 - 12:23pm PT
"In Australia we had guns, right up until 1996. In 1996 Australia had the biggest massacre on earth. Still hasn't been beaten," Jefferies says. "Now after that they banned guns. Now in the 10 years before Port Arthur, there were 10 massacres. Since the gun ban in 1996, there hasn't been a single massacre since. I don't know how or why this happened. Maybe it was a coincidence."


yes indeed

this was just a coincidence

Norton

Social climber
Jun 25, 2015 - 12:31pm PT
MB I hope you view this post as constructive criticism, but honestly, your posts are way too long. I don't have time to read all that, even though I often think you have interesting things to say.

yes, I make it a point to read every post on threads that interest me

but I have to just skip some people who go on and on, in the interest of time and boredom
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 25, 2015 - 12:45pm PT
At zero impact to the law-abiding citizen besides maybe a little tax money. Seems like a pretty fair trade. Feel free to oppose it, though, if you think there's no benefit to it.

I'm totally with you.

I'm in no way opposed to programs that even cost a bit of money, even believing that they don't do much to even point in the right general direction much less actually accomplish anything of significance, as long as it makes the anti-gunners feel like they're doing some good.

Meanwhile the actual problem has virtually nothing to do with guns per se, and if we're gonna get serious that there IS a problem and do something substantive about it, all the frothy hand-waving about gun control is barking entirely up the wrong tree. Rather than divisive "debates" about gun control, we really need to get serious about the causes of culturally-entrenched violence.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 25, 2015 - 01:03pm PT
we really need to get serious about the causes of culturally-entrenched violence.

I have offered some solutions to the mass murder in America issue

I would like to hear your own, sorry I can't remember reading them
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 25, 2015 - 01:06pm PT
MB I hope you view this post as constructive criticism, but honestly, your posts are way too long. I don't have time to read all that, even though I often think you have interesting things to say.

Point taken. It's a struggle. I try to break things up into clearly-defined sections. Ultimately, if you find any value, enjoy. Skip the rest with my compliments. :-)

Thanks!
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 25, 2015 - 01:13pm PT
I have offered some solutions to the mass murder in America issue

Indeed you have, Norton, and I greatly appreciate your thoughts and general tone on this thread. I know you aren't asking me, but I think a central database of prohibited purchasers or possessors of firearms, and a requirement that any seller or transferror (including donors) of firearms check that database prior to delivery, would go a long way toward removing firearms from the sorts of massacres we suffered in Sandy Hook or Charleston. At the very least, knowing the certainty of prosectution for delivery of a firearm to an unlawful recipient who uses the firearm would deter lawful firearms owners from transferring ownership to someone on the prohibited list.

John
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 25, 2015 - 01:24pm PT
Funny that on the gun debate thread when someone would come up with an article that was an accident that got someone killed with a gun, the cry from pro-gun people was that it doesn't count, it was an accident and you can't legislate away stupidity. But accidents with cars do count?

A couple distinct differences with regards to comparing cars to guns.

First off, car deaths are almost all accidents. There is a big difference between accidents and premeditated murder, both in the eyes of the courts and the eyes of the public. Dont believe me, the public still chooses to participate in driving!

To be fair drunk driving is terribly irresponsible! But there are more and more laws against it and harsher penalties yearly, and they are doing some good. Luckily the cars they drive are registered and reregistered each time they are passed on to the next person. Makes tracking the owner down pretty easy. No where to hide, we know who that car belongs to.

Now, when these assassins start using cars as there weapon of choice to mass murder people on a regular basis, you'll get as much of an uproar against cars as there is now against guns.

jonnyrig

climber
Jun 25, 2015 - 01:28pm PT
Then why do we let people without licenses own cars?
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 25, 2015 - 01:34pm PT
I know you aren't asking me, but I think a central database of prohibited purchasers or possessors of firearms, and a requirement that any seller or transferror (including donors) of firearms check that database prior to delivery, would go a long way toward removing firearms from the sorts of massacres we suffered in Sandy Hook or Charleston. At the very least, knowing the certainty of prosectution for delivery of a firearm to an unlawful recipient who uses the firearm would deter lawful firearms owners from transferring ownership to someone on the prohibited list.

I agree John. Like you say, it won't stop everyone every time, but we need to get off this idea that it won't work because not everyone will follow the law.

johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jun 25, 2015 - 01:38pm PT
Then why do we let people without licenses own cars?

There not supposed to be driving.

Oh gee, ya got me with that everyo e won't follow the law.


Why have a constitution if everybody won't follow it?

JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 25, 2015 - 02:00pm PT
Locker, you can start the database by having all the states and the feds give a list of convicted criminals who are prohibited from owning firearms to the authority maintaing the list. Then require any pharmacist that fills a prescription for a drug indicating mental instability to notify the central database. Pharmacists already have duties in dealing with certain prescriptions, so I don't think this requirement would be particularly costly or burdensome.

The list won't be perfect, but I think both Roof and Adam Lanza (the Sandy Hook shooter) would be on the list.

On a completely different subject, the "define moron" subthread reminds me of a conversation I overheard on my high school track team. One of my teammates said to another that had been annoying him, "You're an a##hole." To which the recipient of the insult replied "Define 'a##hole.'" I'm sure you're not surprise to learn that the insulter replied "You're the definition of one." Both went on to get college degrees. One earned a Ph.D. Who said lowbrow exchanges can't emerge from high-powered minds?

John

Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 25, 2015 - 02:00pm PT
madbolter: I guess that mail order degree of your in analytical philosophy qualifies as authority to inform us that there is absolutely no point whatsoever in attempting to fix what's so obviously broken regarding with the U.S. obsession with firearms. Such deep insights.

It's certainly clear that money is being spent in buckets to improve the lot of the downtrodden, so I guess that's why places like Flint and Detroit are such vibrant, prosperous cities.

You ARE aware, aren't you that a philosophy degree is generally considered the punch line for any joke referring to a waste of academic time? Now I finally understand.

Did they ever explain to you during your classes that there's a way to use philosophy to justify pretty well anything?

And I sure feel terrible about beating up on the poor helpless 1%ers. Of course they should be entitled to keep all the money they have stolen from lesser beings.

Far better people than you fought and died to make the U.S. a peaceful, prosperous nation for all Americans, and you dishonour their sacrifices.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Jun 25, 2015 - 04:23pm PT
How about the Pharmacy.

We can spread the responsibility far enough from the gun industry somehow.


HS.

LOL.

Way to stand up,Stewart.

One should visit some of Canada before slamming the place.
They are doing something right there.
To diverse for most here in the US,One big reason why.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 25, 2015 - 06:05pm PT
Trad Hog: Missed your post. I figure on my worst day I've got twice as many functioning brain cells as you have had operating during the best 24 hour period of your life. Come to think of it, I figure the average Canadian tree stump has more smarts.

The above comments are not intended to slag the citizens of the U.S. in general. Many of the Americans on this forum have enough intelligence to agree that gun violence is a plague upon all that is good and decent in their nation, and something most urgently should be done about it.

That also makes them smarter than you, Trad Pig, er Hog - or at the very least, more honourable representatives of the human race.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 25, 2015 - 07:04pm PT
Ahh, I see that "Stewy" is doing "his" best to get this thread frozen.

That's the "honorable" thing to do.
madbolter1

Big Wall climber
Denver, CO
Jun 25, 2015 - 07:08pm PT
They are doing something right there.

I lived there for years and still know quite a few good folks there. But comparing Canada to the USA is, well, pretty irrelevant.

Big land mass with very few people.

Parliamentary political system based on GB (unless you're talking about Quebec, which really doesn't think it's "Canada").

Not even resembling a world power and with exactly zero aspirations toward being one.

How they cope with their "problems" up there isn't gonna tell us a whole lot, eh?
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 25, 2015 - 08:22pm PT
Cosmiccragsman: Well, maybe that's a place to start.
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
Jun 25, 2015 - 09:00pm PT
Civilized countries all over the world have far less gun violence than we have. With strict licensing laws. With VERY strict laws on which kinds of guns can be in the hands of anyone, including peace officers. With restrictions even on which peace officers are trained and licensed to carry on duty. And with a culture that doesn't glorify guns.
Surely, these countries aren't free of civil strife and violent crime. But the outcomes are FAR different. Very very few people are killed by peace officers in UK, Germany, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, etc.
And yes, the police are entirely capable of shooting to kill when necessary.

The answers are out there.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 25, 2015 - 10:13pm PT
Cosmiccragsman: A moment of shared good taste.

Now let's see what else we can agree on ;)
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 29, 2015 - 10:50pm PT
is somethin resonating there for ya locker?

whats up^)
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Jun 29, 2015 - 11:00pm PT
i's gettin worryed itz pas yo bed time

the article is good but its prolly only covers 20% of people
Messages 1 - 490 of total 490 in this topic
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta