Message to ATT/GoPhone


Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 21 - 37 of total 37 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>

Feb 13, 2013 - 03:01pm PT
Why are you posting this here for me to read?

Besides, how confidential do you expect it to be Bryce?
"This message is considered confidential, privileged and
protected by US and CA. state laws pertaining to such. It
may also consist of attorney client work product also
prohibiting any further disclosure other than to whom it's
addressed. Bryce

The above footer applies to civil matters. This is not civil
and I want any support whether police, some other public agent
or agency, DoD etc. or att employee to be jailed under a PC 502.
I also paid you for the new number change! "

Topic Author's Reply - Feb 13, 2013 - 04:44pm PT
I do not give those phone companies names including mine.
They were charging $5.00 per month to keep peoples numbers
out of the phone books. That's very odd when by law they are
not suppose to give out numbers. Im changing the phone company
and number again. It's not that im a pretender.

There is no provision at this point that i see for lodging procedure
prior to motion to seal being heard followed by motion to unseal.
Secondly due to what occured prior at the same companies I take it also
as serious threat

Mountain climber
Anchorage AK, Reno NV
Feb 13, 2013 - 04:54pm PT
1st world problem..

Topic Author's Reply - Feb 13, 2013 - 04:58pm PT
What the 2006-2007 US Supreme Court Ruling upholding some
tri-unity? Read USC SEC. They really have no authority by USC
just don't talk to them. County Code 52 is not going change
mathematicaly but i don't know if their triunity was granted
authority other than to prosecute what they think is fraud
if you speak to them.

Ice climber
the ghost
Feb 13, 2013 - 05:14pm PT
speak US Supreme Court They going really than by USC have if you they think 2006-2007 if their triunity no other What some is not County Code 52 Read to prosecute tri-unity? don't talk change them. but i don't know to to them. Ruling granted upholding is fraud was authority USC SEC. what just the mathematicaly authority

Mountain climber
Anchorage AK, Reno NV
Feb 13, 2013 - 05:21pm PT
You lost me at hello

Topic Author's Reply - Feb 13, 2013 - 05:53pm PT

Canada, US. Maybe but like i said what's
in the 2006-2007 trade secret manual is
very vague.

Cultural differences sometimes are not just cultural. Maybe
political affiliations?

No argument there, it's a stiff penalty for a lie even if not

Social climber
Feb 13, 2013 - 06:23pm PT
Having trouble with ATT? The pleasure becomes unbearable when you attempt to to login to your account or attempt to change your password when you can't get in.

Topic Author's Reply - Feb 13, 2013 - 08:46pm PT
I left a message with T and just tried to call
my uncle. Regardless of speaking to T prior, a
FCC complaint is probably being filed tomorrow. If
I can verify from T if he did not respond
to the message i sent with the number ill draft
the life charge against them mentioned previously to

//This has been sent.
Tell DP im ready to the fill out the FCC complaint.
If he's still with you bring him tomorrow.

Ill make 1 also to the Secretary of State and Doj
with a copy of the FCC complaint.

To: I was ready to let it go with what's in the thread
and nothing more until I just tried to call my uncle.
They opened it today but now it's doing the same.

This message is considered confidential, privileged and
protected by US and CA. state laws pertaining to such. It
may also consist of attorney client work product also
prohibiting any further disclosure other than to whom it's
addressed. Bryce


Topic Author's Reply - Feb 13, 2013 - 09:01pm PT
There was pre-set passwords that could not be removed. The passwords
were removed somewhat due to my request as they denied giving me the
password which i view as more than likely larceny.

This replacement phone has never corrected itself in regards to the
icon that shows read and write. It does not stabalize to read only
until after going through 3 cycles lasting a total of about 1/2 hr.

These are not current issues as the phone still functioned with the
password removed and also with the instability of the read and write.

Trad climber
Here and There
Feb 13, 2013 - 10:13pm PT
What the f*#k? Over.

Feb 14, 2013 - 06:23pm PT
What the f*#k? Over.

These are system passwords not web passwords.

I would not tell them to remove a system password.
System passwords as above are basicly not able to be
circumvented or undone with the salt of crypt due to
hashing 1 way unlike web, wireless etc. passwords.

Click on the top link youll notice the system passwords
are shadowed as this "*". If not shadowed they show up
as strings as this [0-9][A-F]. 9F=9*^16+15*^0.
The typeglobs to the right of the = are multiplication
symbols multiplying the exponent, hence 9*16=151 and
15 is the starting base power of the polynomial which
increases to the left so 15 is added to 151. A radix
seperation increases to the right. However the system
passwords as I know probably have no radix seperation
and maybe integers and not real numbers however
many years have past and I either don't remember or
never knew the internal formats of the system passwords

The 9 typeglobs '*' set default in my phone were unknown
as a system password string to me. Again noting the shadowed
system passwords are 1 type glob '*' not 9.

Trad climber
los angeles, ca
Feb 14, 2013 - 06:34pm PT
B_E_S please be my valentine. All your sexy talk really gets me going!

Feb 14, 2013 - 06:43pm PT
Slayton I don't really know what your asking?

Im not into valentines.
Form 2000B-Billing, Privacy, or Service Quality Complaint.
Approved by OMB
Estimated time per response:30 minutes

This FCC form just retained is dated September 2007 and I
need to make certain it's the current and there's no pre
claim requirement. Are you in the printing business? Perhaps
you can make some prints for me.

Feb 15, 2013 - 05:35pm PT
Sunday 3 text messages were sent containing only my first, middle and
last initials to 3 persons ive known for 35 years. 1 who i thought
would be asleep responded with about a 1/2 dozen calls back that
billed. I do not approve of or use unlimited and i rarely use
text messaging. It was used because of the hours where 2 of
them live. The 1/2 dozen inbound calls I could not hear.

After the inbound calls i tried to call but again there
was no sound only the connection for billing. I received
a text message after the 1/2 dozen inbound calls from the
1 who called and they used my full first name "but my name
was not spelled correctly?" We have known each other
for 35 years?

I then tried to call a family member and again had the same
billing problem without sound.

Around Monday I called 1-800-331-0500 and was told they thought
it maybe that a IMEI number was entered to block the phone. I
explained the IMEI number from a previous phone that was stolen
was turned in to block that phone and this phone was the replacement
and is still current phone with a number change. The phone worked
after the number change and i think only voicemail was called
and support at the above number prior to these issues.

Wed. I called and they asked me to turn the phone off and then
on which i did. The phone then worked as before.

Yesterday the phone again was not working so again i called their
number above and prior to them calling me i let her hear some
sound. She then called and there was no sound so she asked me
to turn on the speaker when she called back and there is sound
with the speaker, but i told her there is problem with her telling
me there is a sound problem because the sound she listened to was
not from the speakerphone and the sound is fine without the
speakerphone when i set key pad and other tones.

Malemute noting this last paragraph and thinking back to level
5 assembly class interrupts that others use for passing viruses
i ask could this be a deliberate and tortious interrupt that while not
necessarily passing a virus which hides and then re-replicates itself
it's interrupting the headset speaker that only i and the other
person hear, but not the speakerphone that everybody else hears?
Ive pretty much ruled out police 911 involvement with these issues
as when the network sim card is removed the sound is fine though
i have not called them yet on 911 which ill do a little later
without the sim card. If the samething is occurring with 911 ill
get back here to discuss other possibilities.

Slayton a tenable complaint with a possible life sentence is dependent
upon declaration from T who is 1 mentioned above and it's not relevant
whether or not the message was cordial.

Feb 15, 2013 - 08:24pm PT
Malemute, i just hung up the phone without the att sim card after speaking
to police normally. 911 in OC CA defaults to each cities dept. and when
traveling to Silicon Valley outside of city limits i believe it defaulted
to a county sheriffs.

The target has now shifted back to the topic.

Topic Author's Reply - Feb 19, 2013 - 09:48am PT
For certain I need to get rid of the phone due to the
phone being taken apart. On 2-16-13 while napping on
a green belt in the same spot the phone prior was stolen
from I awoke, and "a battery and a sim card" were left
a few feet away from the phone. The number is also probably
again being changed.

Im unable to determine if the battery and sim card are from
this phone, another or the one stolen.
Messages 21 - 37 of total 37 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

Try a free sample topo!

SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews