Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 189 of total 189 in this topic
Studly

Trad climber
WA
Mar 12, 2010 - 03:36pm PT
Why don't we just give it back to Mexico?
Jingy

Social climber
Nowhere
Mar 12, 2010 - 03:40pm PT
good call studly!!!

just break it off from the bottom of the nation!!!


"uhm.. hey mexico.. here.. we don't really want this place anymore.....

Plus.. these people don't want to be part of america anyway.. so.. it's a win-win!!!"


That would be funny!!!


The impact christianity has had on the US... interesting...

just about every war, and the cutting of all public anything...

That pretty much sums it up in my book


skychild

Trad climber
Birmingham, Alabama
Mar 12, 2010 - 03:44pm PT
The only thing I hate more than Texas is



















Texans Just sayin Don
nature

climber
Tucson, AZ
Mar 12, 2010 - 03:47pm PT
when put up the fence and give it over to Mexico will the village idiot be inside?

otherwise no deal....
willie!!!!!

Trad climber
99827
Mar 12, 2010 - 03:49pm PT
I'm all for it! Could we move Austin to Pelican first?
dktem

Trad climber
Temecula
Mar 12, 2010 - 04:01pm PT
From the article:

“I reject the notion by the left of a constitutional separation of church and state,” said David Bradley, a conservative from Beaumont who works in real estate. “I have $1,000 for the charity of your choice if you can find it in the Constitution.”

1st Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."

Mr. Bradley, please send the check to the Access Fund or ASCA.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Mar 12, 2010 - 04:07pm PT
You're wrong.

You don't collect $1,000.

There is no state-established religion.
dktem

Trad climber
Temecula
Mar 12, 2010 - 04:28pm PT
“I reject the notion by the left of a constitutional separation of church and state,” said David Bradley, a conservative from Beaumont who works in real estate. “I have $1,000 for the charity of your choice if you can find it in the Constitution.

Trouble reading?

Or are you seriously attempting to argue that the Constitution does not call for a separation of church and state?

I'm pretty sure Mr. Bradley has never actually read his Constitution. He just likes to mention it when arguing his own personal ideas. It makes him sound more patriotic, more American. No one ever corrects him, because the people he hangs around with have never read it either.

There's a lot of that going around these days.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Mar 12, 2010 - 04:34pm PT
You're making a fantastic case for getting Government out of the school-business alltogether.

As long as it's run by the Government, the will of the majority will prevail.

Do you think the majority voted to Jesus-up the textbooks because they want their kids indoctrinated? No. It's because they want it taught to your kids.
Gary

climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Mar 12, 2010 - 05:20pm PT
Don't pray in my school, and I won't think in your church.
Port

Trad climber
San Diego
Mar 12, 2010 - 05:32pm PT
It's odd to me that so many people seem to think that our country was founded on, and needs to return to, christian values. Here are a few of my favorite quotes from our founding fathers.


"I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church, by the Roman Church, by the Greek Church, by the Turkish Church, by the Protestant Church, nor by any Church that I know of. My own mind is my own Church. Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and for my own part, I disbelieve them all."
-Thomas Paine (Glenn Beck's homeboy)

"lighthouses are more helpful than Churches"
-Benjamin Franklin

"In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.
-Thomas Jefferson

"This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it."
-John Adams

"Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise."
-James Madison

"I was in hopes that the enlightened and liberal policy, which has marked the present age, would at least have reconciled Christians of every denomination so far that we should never again see the religious disputes carried to such a pitch as to endanger the peace of society."
-George Washington
rockermike

Trad climber
Berkeley
Mar 12, 2010 - 05:52pm PT
thats an impressive list of quotes. If I'm not mistaken all of the above individuals are actually Masons. At war with Christianity since the time of ancient Egypt. (if that makes sense).

they even brag about it:
http://www.calodges.org/no406/FAMASONS.HTM

In any case the constitution guarantees freedom OF religion and a separation of church and state; but not "freedom FROM religion". The atheist cabal seem to conflate the two ideas.

Personally I think they need to teach more religion in public schools, but unfortunately the inevitable mixing of simple minded indoctrination with what could be broad intellectual examination of various traditions makes it problematic.
Lynne Leichtfuss

Sport climber
Will know soon
Mar 12, 2010 - 05:59pm PT
Real live/life Christianity is just that ..... following jesus. A nation may have/had it roots in Christ following, but that doesn't make it a forever happening.

Just hanging out at home on this beautiful Friday getting the casa in order for the Woodson BBQ and hilarious slanderfest next Saturday. Cheers, lynnie

Edit: Read "crazy love" by Francis Chan....it's guarenteed to rock Yo world. :D
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Mar 12, 2010 - 06:01pm PT
If I read the OP correctly, he's saying that as a supposedly (to some) Christian nation, the USA is damned. Hmmm, need to think about that one.
Prezwoodz

climber
Anchorage
Mar 12, 2010 - 06:08pm PT
Do you think the majority voted to Jesus-up the textbooks because they want their kids indoctrinated? No. It's because they want it taught to your kids.


Thats pretty messed up. I mean what gives them the right? I say screw off. All that they are doing is making me want to teach my kids to disbelieve. "See Kids, thats what you can turn into if you don't disbelieve. Someone who thinks they know everything yet cant offer a damn lick of proof."
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Mar 12, 2010 - 06:32pm PT
Tough.

That's what you get when you surrender your responsibilities over to the Government. Others get to make what used to be your decisions for you.
Binks

Social climber
Mar 12, 2010 - 06:37pm PT
Chaz, you aren't making any sense. The government didn't make these textbooks.
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Mar 12, 2010 - 06:37pm PT
That's what you get when you surrender your responsibilities over to the Government. Others get to make what used to be your decisions for you.

Umm, that's why the Republicans were voted out of the federal govt. We want freedom and equality. Time to vote 'em out if Texass too I reckon.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Mar 12, 2010 - 07:15pm PT
The Government decides which ones they're going to buy, depending on what's printed within.
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Mar 12, 2010 - 07:18pm PT
Apparently part of the concern here is that the school boards in a few large states, such as New York, California, and Texas, decide on the books and curriculum not just for themselves, but de facto for smaller states. They set standards which others are stuck with. So an a-historical agenda presenting the US and/or Texas as "christian" may get wider circulation than just Texas.
Tobia

Social climber
GA
Mar 12, 2010 - 08:06pm PT
In the state of Georgia, or my school district (3500 + students), teachers volunteer to be on a committee and select the textbooks for their particular discipline, such as science. Major publishers present their books and services. The teachers vote and decide; usually a couple of teachers from each grade level. I have never considered whether some publishers are disallowed from presenting their books; although that might be a possibility.


gunsmoke

Trad climber
Clackamas, Oregon
Mar 12, 2010 - 08:20pm PT
It seems to me that the "we were never a Christian nation" folks are handpicking their quotes, especially in the case of George Washington. How about this handpicked quote from President Woodrow Wilson, 1911 (quoted from America's God and Country, page 697), "America was born a Christian nation. America was born to exemplify that devotion to the elements of righteousness which are derived from the [Bible]." I think the disagreements about whether or not the nation was, at its inception, a Christian nation, derives largely from not having agreed upon criteria for making the judgment.
Port

Trad climber
San Diego
Mar 12, 2010 - 08:29pm PT
gunsmoke,

My point in posting those quotes is only to point out that this country was NOT founded by Christians. However, Christianity has, not doubt, had an influence on our society and this influence should be noted in history texts. The truth, as I see it, is that these issues have always been contentious. This debate is nothing new, its been around for a very long time. And finally, to rewrite history and portray our founders as Christians is factually incorrect. I believe that we should educated our children about the debate, not portray our founders as this unified group with common values, because lets face it, they were not really all that unified.

Lissiehoya

climber
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 12, 2010 - 08:32pm PT
Portray they as they were then: theologically as deists, but most who never broke away from their own Christian communities.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Mar 12, 2010 - 08:32pm PT
Like it or not, the people who founded this country were Christians.

Doesn't mean you or I have to be, but they were.
Port

Trad climber
San Diego
Mar 12, 2010 - 08:38pm PT
Ok Chaz, what makes someone a christian then? because when one rewrites the bible taking out all of jesus' miracle's and leaving only his moral teachings, a 'christian' would probably call that blasphemy. A desecration of the bible. But this is what Thomas Jefferson did!!!! and how do you reconcile all the anti-christian/anti church quotes?

Lissie is on the money, they were deists. NOT christians.
Fat Dad

Trad climber
Los Angeles, CA
Mar 12, 2010 - 08:38pm PT
The other problem with the fundamentalist characterization is that, having described the Founders as Christians, they will characterize them as having the very same beliefs that the fundamentalists now do, which could not be further from the truth.
drsmonkey

Trad climber
A hole
Mar 12, 2010 - 09:04pm PT
Funny how a Texan's mind works...

This great nation was founded upon Christianity, therefore we must teach christianity in order to keep this nation great. (e.g. What was good 200+ years ago is good now, don't you dare let anything change.)

Also, isn't it interesting that bible and the constitution are generally the favorite texts of unedumacated wackos? You get to pick and choose the bits you like, interpret them however you want, then ignore the rest.

e.g. Same Tex hollerin' about not seeing "nuthin bout no seperation of state and religion" probably can see how the 2nd amendment gives him the "right to own any dang gun I want, and let's see them feds try and take 'em away."

...And vice versa for some of us here.
jstan

climber
Mar 12, 2010 - 09:13pm PT
I have often wondered.

Move all the citizens of Israel to Texas.

Make it a separate nation.
Prezwoodz

climber
Anchorage
Mar 12, 2010 - 09:16pm PT
Not really, thankfully people can always change that. When it does change just remember what you said.
klk

Trad climber
cali
Mar 12, 2010 - 09:20pm PT
Like it or not, the people who founded this country were Christians.

Many of the so-called "Founding Fathers" were practicing Christians, though very few professed religious beliefs that would satisfy 21st century fundamentalists.

But many of the highest profile figures-- notably Jefferson-- were Deists.

Deists weren't Christians. Deists did not believe in the divinity of Christ nor did they believe in Christ as a supernatural figure nor did they believe in an active God who worked in the daily lives of humans in any way. When Franklin or a Jefferson wrote, "God," it did not refer to any deity recognizable to most 21st century Americans who self-identify as Christians.

Hence the decision in Texas to remove references to Jefferson from the textbook.

There were many, many Americans who more nearly resembled 21st century fundamentalists and some evangelicals, but they were precisely the sort of folks that a Jefferson-- or even a Washington --hoped to keep out of the political process.
Lissiehoya

climber
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 12, 2010 - 09:34pm PT
@Port, you have to still keep in mind that they never actually broke away from their Christian communities so even though their theology was suspect, they were still Christians in that sense.
Port

Trad climber
San Diego
Mar 12, 2010 - 09:57pm PT
Lissie, I see what you're saying but I'm not sure if the christian label is appropriate. Is a christian of today the same as a christian of 1787? I acknowledge that many held a belief in the christian conceptualization of god. And for many, that is enough to call them christian.

I guess what really bothers me is that the christian right is making the argument that what makes this country great is its reliance on christian values when in fact the exact opposite is true! Its our divergence from theology which has made us such a great country.
gunsmoke

Trad climber
Clackamas, Oregon
Mar 12, 2010 - 10:48pm PT
If this were a Christian Nation, Only One kind Of Christainity would be approved, and that is: Government Sanctioned Christianity
Dr. F, I think you're getting to heart of the question. We have to have a definition of a "Christian nation" before we can answer the question "are we a Christian nation?". By your definition, I concur (and surely all must agree) that we are not and never were a "Christian nation".
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Mar 12, 2010 - 10:48pm PT
Port, and Klk,

If Jefferson wasn't a Christian, how come he routinely signed his corrispondence "In the Year Of Our Lord Jesus Christ, 17xx" ?

gunsmoke

Trad climber
Clackamas, Oregon
Mar 12, 2010 - 10:57pm PT
I guess what really bothers me is that the christian right is making the argument that what makes this country great is its reliance on christian values

Port, are you inferring that the country wasn't founded on Christian values? It is interesting that a great number, I suspect the majority, of the non-Christian founding fathers (e.g., Jefferson) still felt that a society should be built on a set of moral values and that the Bible was the best and preferred set of such values. We actually have two questions which shouldn't be conflated. 1) Are/were we a Christian nation; 2) Were we founded on Christian values. The evidence in favor of "yes" is much stronger for the second of the two questions.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Mar 12, 2010 - 11:02pm PT
Muslims are the current whipping boy, but Christians have been responsible for more misery in the World in the last 2000 years than any other belief system.
jstan

climber
Mar 12, 2010 - 11:03pm PT
Muslims are the current whipping boy, but Christians have added more misery to the World in the last 2000 years than any other belief system.
corniss chopper

Mountain climber
san jose, ca
Mar 12, 2010 - 11:04pm PT
Texas rules!

AUSTIN, Texas -- After three days of turbulent meetings,
the Texas Board of Education on Friday approved a social studies curriculum
that will put a conservative stamp on history and economics textbooks.
Among other things, the curriculum will stress the superiority of American
capitalism, question the Founding Fathers' commitment to a purely secular
government and present Republican political philosophies in a more positive
light.

(because they couldn't find any Liberal ones that made any sense)


WBraun

climber
Mar 12, 2010 - 11:06pm PT
Look at all you complainers who always complain about religious/religion threads and you're posting in them.

This proves you're all closet religious nuts too.

You're all goin to hell.

Nope, you're already in hell ........
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Mar 12, 2010 - 11:07pm PT
Christians have been responsible for more misery in the World in the last 2000 years than any other belief system.

Uh,

Marxist atheists out did 2000 years worth in spades in just the last century.

Not even a close comparison.
Port

Trad climber
San Diego
Mar 12, 2010 - 11:11pm PT
That is pretty weak grounds for an assumption of someone's faith simply based on an inscription of a date. But I think that Jefferson probably had a great respect and understanding of Jesus Christ and his moral teachings. But that alone hardly makes someone a christian.


gunsmoke, I do not think we are a christian nation. We are a divided nation and always have been. There have been few changes. What "overwhelming evidence" is there, please list it.

If the U.S. was founded on christian values then why is god not referenced a single time in the constitution?Not once! you're telling me that a bunch of christians got together to create a new country and simply left god out of its founding document by accident?
vlani

Trad climber
mountain view, ca
Mar 12, 2010 - 11:16pm PT
Religious people who are used to believe not question are much easier to fool.. I mean govern. May not be a bad thing after all
gunsmoke

Trad climber
Clackamas, Oregon
Mar 12, 2010 - 11:16pm PT
gunsmoke, I do not think we are a christian nation. We are a divided nation and always have been. There have been few changes. What "overwhelming evidence" is there, please list it.

Hmm, I don't seem to remember using the quoted phrase "overwhelming evidence" which you attribute to me. I think I said, "The evidence in favor of "yes" is much stronger for the second of the two questions."
Port

Trad climber
San Diego
Mar 12, 2010 - 11:19pm PT
you're right. I misread you.
Lynne Leichtfuss

Sport climber
Will know soon
Mar 13, 2010 - 12:05am PT
donini, give me a break. Read Matthew 5,6 and 7. This is what jesus wanted his followers (who should also be christians) to aspire to.... in how we live out our lives. If these words of jesus were followed....if only to the best ability of a person, Christianity would not have been as you say......causing misery for the past 2000 years. lynnie

So was it ? Real christianity or just a label.

Edit: Read "Crazy Love" by Francis Chan....that will give yo a buzz. I have an extra copy if you want it.
jstan

climber
Mar 13, 2010 - 12:13am PT
So we have agreement?

Some group of people has been causing misery for 2000 years.

Now that we have that straight we can talk price.

Lynne:

They all said they were christian. And they all quoted from that same book.

Same melliflous sounds. Very resonant and reassuring.

Same passages we get here on ST.

Don't know that back then they had Gobee's great lyrics tho.

Progress I guess.
Lynne Leichtfuss

Sport climber
Will know soon
Mar 13, 2010 - 12:16am PT
jstan, a group of people called humanity. It's comprised of many subgroups of which quite a few have caused much misery. But there we go with the labels again.
paganmonkeyboy

climber
mars...it's near nevada...
Mar 13, 2010 - 12:17am PT
ya know, it'd be funny if it was a tv show...
corniss chopper

Mountain climber
san jose, ca
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:00am PT
Let this be a lesson to what poor losers the Liberals are.

"Do not mess with the forces of Nature, for thou art small and biodegradable!"


Lynne Leichtfuss

Sport climber
Will know soon
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:06am PT
jstan, "they all Said they were christian"....? and the boys in my high school Said they didn't cut down the victory tree. What a human says versus what they actually do or not do.......gotta watch the outcome. :D
elcap-pics

climber
Crestline CA
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:17am PT
The christian bible is so full of terrible things done by god and for god that I wonder how christians can stomach it and preach it... mostly they just don't mention the ugly stuff and just pluck a few good things and browbeat the rest of the world with them. Almost half of the 10 commandments that, BTW the christians say are the foundation of our law, have nothing to do with our laws and would be declared unconstitutional if somehow enacted. No wonder the constitution is a god free, (christian or otherwise), document. Whatever part of the founders were christians they knew well enough to leave religion out of the governments grubby hands. They well knew about the tyrany of the majority.
GDavis

Social climber
SOL CAL
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:41am PT
Fear fear fear...

so much fear.

you would think the ice caps were melting, or the government was manufacturing a war for oil or something.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 13, 2010 - 02:55am PT
I am perplexed by this insistance upon the religion of the founders.

Part of their brilliance was the establishment of a country that did not require a person to be like them, whatever they were.

The enforced uniformity was what they were attempting to escape!

Now there are those who want to establish the requirement of uniformity.

What could be more treasonous, subversive, and anti-American than that?
Patrick Sawyer

climber
Originally California now Ireland
Mar 13, 2010 - 06:53am PT
Supertopians, there is nothing you can say to get Chaz's goat... any of them, he just won't give them up.


Wow Gunsmoke, I didn't know that Woodrow Wilson was a Founding Father. Boy, he must have had a long life and waited a hell of a long time to be elected to the White House. Just because a 20th century president says we are a Christian nation, and we are to believe it, like many Americans do, then we are in trouble. At least we no longer have a president like Dubya who talks with GOD. Shades of the Ayatollah.



Its our divergence from theology which has made us such a great country.

Port, I agree with you on that one. Look at the countries that are run by "theologians" (so to speak). Usually women have no rights, minorities are oppressed and there is no real freedom. In GOD we trust.



Let this be a lesson to what poor losers the Liberals are.

Corniss, liberals, poor losers? Hey dirty tricks seem to be a flavor in any politics, but I think the conservatives and Repugs are the dirtiest, especially when they lose. And boy, do they complain when they lose.

I'll send you some coffee so you can wake up and smell it.
the kid

Trad climber
fayetteville, wv
Mar 13, 2010 - 10:08am PT
texas is crazy and full of crazy right wing losers...
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Mar 13, 2010 - 10:17am PT
Texas seems to be the one state immune to the Obama Recession.

Maybe the rest of the Country should be more like Texas.
gunsmoke

Trad climber
Clackamas, Oregon
Mar 13, 2010 - 10:33am PT
Wow Gunsmoke, I didn't know that Woodrow Wilson was a Founding Father.

Patrick, my point was more to show that the notion that the country was a Christian nation is a viewpoint held by many of education and respect. Wilson, for instance, was President of Princeton University before becoming President of the United States. The number of quotes about God among the founding fathers is almost endless for those who wish to search them out. What I haven't seen is a quote from a founding father that the country was NOT a Christian nation. I think that's a view that didn't really surface until the last few decades. (Note, Separation of Church and State does not equal Not Christian.) The phrase "one nation under God" was added to the Pledge of Allegiance in the 1950's, I believe. I don't intend to use Supertopo to engage in a war of selected quotes, but it's not for the inability to do so.
Patrick Sawyer

climber
Originally California now Ireland
Mar 13, 2010 - 10:58am PT
Fair play Gunsmoke, but weren't you slightly concerned when Dubya claimed he TALKED with GOD and GOD ANSWERED back?

Sort of like some Middle East 'leaders' who claim "divine providence", in this case, meaning they are carrying out God's commands. Didn't Dubya allude to something like this? That he was carrying out God's word?

And pleeeaase Bushbots on the Taco Stand, don't try saying that Bush meant it in a figurative way and not literally, that he just meant prayer. Correct me if I am wrong, and I am sure you will, but as I saw it, he implied that he actually TALKED with God. Scary for the leader of a (supposedly) secular nation to be saying stuff like that.
Lissiehoya

climber
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 13, 2010 - 11:13am PT
@Port, I agree what you're saying (since my area of study is the history of Christianity). But I think saying that the Founding Fathers were *not* Christian is just as inaccurate as saying they *were* Christian in the context of modern evangelical Christianity.

The problem is with trying to reduce things like this to the most simple explanation when what textbooks really should say is something like, "The Founding Fathers of the United States of America were Christians, in that they participated in their Christian communities of the time. However, the Christian beliefs they held might look very odd to a modern-day Christian. They believed.... blah blah blah, etc."

Edit: Also, you're right about the morality thing, especially in terms of Jefferson. For the deists, morality was one of the most important, if not the most important, part of religion.
gunsmoke

Trad climber
Clackamas, Oregon
Mar 13, 2010 - 11:49am PT
But I think saying that the Founding Fathers were *not* Christian is just as inaccurate as saying they *were* Christian in the context of modern evangelical Christianity.

Hmmm, shouldn't we also say that Darwin was not really an evolutionist as we understand the term today because many of his scientific beliefs would seem very strange to modern scientists?
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 13, 2010 - 12:27pm PT
Alright, lets try this another way: Is Supertopo a Christian site?

It appears that there are some who would say that would be determined by an examinination of CM's faith.

Is a particular route a Christian Route? What was the faith of the first ascender?

So, lets turn this question on evidence around: Where in the owner's manuals of our country does it tell us that we are a Christian Country?
paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Mar 13, 2010 - 12:29pm PT
The founding fathers may or may not have been Christians, but the act of revolution was decidedly un-Christian. The act of beheading the king in France was tantamount to killing god. The French Revolution was as much a revolution against the church as it was the aristocracy.

The Apostle Paul states with perfect clarity in Romans 13:2 "Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God..."

Of course Paul's talking about resistance to Nero (a genuine despot) in this passage. It is a clear and strict passage condemning any kind of revolution based on the assumption that what is, is God's clear will.

According to the new testament any act of resistance to the government will result in damnation.

All Christians particularly those in Texas would be wise to read Romans chapter 13.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 12:31pm PT
Why do I allow myself to get dragged into these discussions?

Because of the truth. Let's hear some truth! And then I will go . . .

True Christianity and liberalism have much in common, not all, but a great deal . . .

Do you really have a problem with any of the following?





http://www.jesusisaliberal.org/


Why is Jesus a Liberal?

Webster's dictionary defines a Liberal as one who is open minded, not
strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional or established forms or
ways. Jesus was a pluralist Liberal who taught that one need not
conform to strict and orthodox views of God, religion, and life. He
rejected greed, violence, the glorification of power, the amassing of
wealth without social balance, and the personal judging of others, their
lifestyles and beliefs.

Over and over again, He taught us to believe in and live a spiritual and
ethical life based in our essential, inherent goodness. What Jesus
promoted was succinct set of spiritual principals and a way of life
based upon the of love, compassion, tolerance, and a strong belief in
the importance in giving and of generosity to those in need.

While not Biblical scholars, our common sense understanding of His
lessons as philosophically and politically Liberal is founded upon Jesus'
own words (see quotes below), modern interpretations of Liberation
Theology, and in the positive, loving and compassionate application of
His teachings - from the many early Saints to Mother Theresa and
Liberation Theology.

Certainly, Jesus brought a radically Liberal theology to the Orthodox
believers of his time. Jesus IS a Liberal even today because now more
than ever, His principals align with the very core of Liberal Beliefs.




Biblical Quotes Supporting the Belief that Jesus Is A Liberal

Peacemaking, not War Making: Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God. [Matthew 5:9] Resist
not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. [Matthew 5:39] I say unto you, Love your
enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despite-fully use you, and persecute
you; [Matthew 5:44]

The Death Penalty: Thou shalt not kill [Matthew 5:21]

Crime and Punishment: If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to cast a stone at her. [John 8:7] Do not judge, lest
you too be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged and with the measure you use, it will be measured to
you. [Matthew 7:1 & 2.]

Justice: Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled. [Matthew 5:6] Blessed are the
merciful: for they shall obtain mercy [Matthew 5:7] But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your
trespasses. [Matthew 6:15]

Corporate Greed and the Religion of Wealth: In the temple courts [Jesus] found men selling cattle, sheep and doves and other
sitting at tables exchanging money. So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple area, both sheep and cattle;
he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. [John 2:14 & 15.] Watch out! Be on your guard against
all kinds of greed; a man's life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions. [Luke 12.15.] Truly, I say unto you, it will
be hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. [Matthew 19:23] You cannot serve both God and Money. [Matthew 6:24.]

Paying Taxes & Separation of Church & State: Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the
things that are God's. [Matthew 22:21]

Community: Love your neighbor as yourself. .[Matthew 22:39] So in everything, do to others as you would have them do to you.
[Matthew 7:12.] If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven.
[Matthew 19:21]

Equality & Social Programs: But when you give a feast, invite the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed,
because they cannot repay you. You will be repaid at the resurrection of the just. [Luke 14:13 &14.]

Public Prayer & Displays of Faith: And when thou pray, thou shall not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in
the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
But thou, when thou pray, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret…
[Matthew 6:6 & 7]

Strict Enforcement of Religious Laws: If any of you has a son or a sheep and it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will you not take
hold of it and lift it out? [Matthew 12:11] The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath. [Mark 2:27.]

Individuality & Personal Spiritual Experience: Ye are the light of the world. [Matthew 5:14]






Edit:

As Christians we are to resist evil in all of its forms. We have an obligation to do so. Read the good book.

When our government screws up, lies, cheats, steals, does evil, and abuses mankind, tortures, practices extraordinary renditions, murders, assassinates, kills, uses DU against the world that has a half-life of 4.5 Billion yrs., carries out false-flag operations, starts wars to steal resources and for war-profiteering we are to call them out on it.

That is what Jesus would do. We are to be Christ like.

Dissent is Christian.

Jesus went up peacefully against the government powers of the day, and often. He did not let them off the hook for the evil they did. He called them on it. And we know what then happened.

But he is victorious over death and Judgement is coming!
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Mar 13, 2010 - 12:35pm PT
I have it on good word Jesus was a Libertarian.

He liked his wine and he had a strong dislike for tax collectors.
Skeptimistic

Mountain climber
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:14pm PT
Uh, did you read what you posted?

"Public Prayer & Displays of Faith: And when thou pray, thou shall not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But thou, when thou pray, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret… [Matthew 6:6 & 7]"

Seems like you & others break this one all the time on this forum. Just sayin'...
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:14pm PT
Paul R.,


Sorry but you are taking Romans 13 out of context. You have to rightly divide the word of GOD in spirit and in truth to understand.




http://romans13.embassyofheaven.com/understanding.htm

Understanding Romans 13:1-7

How are we going to overcome Romans 13? What was Apostle Paul really saying? The best way to bring understanding on Romans 13 is to ask, "Who was apostle Paul writing to at Rome?" The answer is found at Romans 1:7 Paul was writing to all those in Rome who are "beloved of God, called to be saints." He was not writing to the general population at Rome. He was specifically addressing the "called out ones," the Body of Christ.

If apostle Paul was advocating obedience to secular authorities, then Caesar would have no cause against him. Why would Caesar have Paul beheaded if he was promoting obedience to Rome?

The world loves its own. If Paul belonged to Caesar, Caesar would not want to kill his own. If Paul was promoting "be subject to Caesar," then Paul would be Caesar's friend. You would not kill your own. You don't destroy the very instrument that advertises for you.

The truth is that Apostle Paul was beheaded for promoting a rival government known as the Kingdom of God or the Kingdom of Heaven. Already this new government was turning the world upside down. Caesar had Paul killed to help stop this threat to Rome's power.

If Romans 13 does not mean "obey the State," what does it mean? Romans 13 means, "Remember them which have the rule over you," as you will also find at Hebrews 13:7. Since Paul was addressing the saints at Rome, it is logical that he would instruct them to submit to those who look after their souls. It is a reminder to be obedient to the authorities God has placed over His people. For they are truly the "ministers of God to thee for good." Unlike worldly rulers, God's ministers are not a terror to good works but to the evil. Therefore, "do that which is good and thou shalt have praise of the same."

Powers Not Ordained By God

Romans 13 is probably the most devastating thing to a Christian in the hands of the ungodly. It sounds so convincing to obey those who appear to be in power. For too long, secular governments have used Romans 13 as a club to beat Christians into obedience to them. Just because a group maintains power through their guns and jails, does not mean God put them there.

God said there are powers not ordained by Him at Hosea 8:4, "They have set up kings, but not by me: they have made princes, and I knew it not."

God didn't put them in power over the righteous. That's Satan's idea. The righteous don't need worldly, filthy authorities, which are no authorities at all. Do you think that they can instruct the righteous? They themselves steal. They themselves are perverts. And they presume to instruct the righteous? I don't think so.

Secular Governments Persecuted Paul

Apostle Paul had many troubles with worldly rulers. He was given 39 stripes five times by the Jews, beaten with rods three times, in perils by his own countrymen and by the heathen, and frequently in prison. (See 2 Corinthians 11:23-26). In Damascus the governor kept the city of the Damascenes with a garrison, desiring to apprehend Paul. "And through a window in a basket was I let down by the wall, and escaped his hands," wrote Paul at 2 Corinthians 11:32. That is the same Paul that wrote Romans 13. He was forced to flee from the civil authorities, those "powers that be" that people say are ordained of God. Sorry folks, this does not compute. When Paul says, "the powers that be," he is saying the powers that be powers, are ordained of God. In other words, the only true powers are those that God ordains.

The crux of the matter is this, Does Paul in Romans 13:1-7 argue that the civil government of this world has legitimate authority over the people of God? We believe that the obedient, called-out people of God are not bound to obey manmade civil governments. God's people are answerable to God above all else and are bound by His commands. At the same time, God's people are not to use their liberty as a cloak to do evil, to foment rebellion or waste time trying to influence the politics of the governments of this world. Furthermore, we believe Paul in Romans 13:1-7 is referring to the spiritual leaders of the Body of Christ, not the civil authorities of this world.

If Paul is saying, "Obey the civil authorities," then he has a conflict in his life. Is Paul promoting Caesar or separating from Caesar? If Paul is promoting Caesar, there is no way I want Paul in my Bible. He can't work for Caesar and Jesus Christ. Caesar already has his writings, they are called "revised statutes" or the "law of the land." You can have them if you want. I would rather have God's Word. Actually that which is called the "law of the land," is the law of the devil. The term is used in the U.S. Constitution, where men claim that their laws are the supreme law of the land (See U.S. Constitution, Article VI).

Supreme Law of the Land

"Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets" (Matthew 22:36-40). Do you know what that represents to a Christian? These two commands are the Supreme Law of the Land. If you believe that something else is the supreme law of the land for a Christian, someone has deceived you. It was a thief who drew you away from the true Supreme Law of the Land (see John 10:8).

If you have the two great commandments, how much allegiance do you have left for the worldly rulers of this dark age? Let me tell you, you have ZERO allegiance to Satan and his agents. All your time is spent "loving God" and "loving neighbor," and there is no room left over for obeying Satan and his minions.

And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness. 1 John 5:19

Submitting to the King of Heaven

As true followers of Jesus, we are led by the Spirit and our lives reflect the fact that we belong to another kingdom, the Kingdom of Heaven. Our stay on earth is only transitory. As citizens of Heaven, we are bound to submit and pledge allegiance to the King of Heaven and His government over us. We are not bound to obey the government of some nation just because we happen to be living within their so-called "borders."

Remember, "The earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof" (1 Corinthians 10:26). Yet there is a pack of thieves out there who have divided up the earth and perverts are ruling over it. And they are doing it at the egging on of Satan himself.

Romans 13 has been wrongly interpreted by ruling secular governments to mean a Christian must submit to them. This misinterpretation forms a powerful weapon to neutralize and misdirect the power of God's Kingdom.

As the followers of Jesus Christ, we belong to another Kingdom, the Kingdom of Heaven. The Kingdom has its own government, its own laws, and its own leaders. Apostle Paul was not commanding us in Romans 13 to submit to the civil authorities of the kingdoms of this world. He was commanding us to submit to the authority of God's leaders who oversee the "called-out ones."

It is a fallacy that Paul was commanding Christians at Rome to submit to the secular government. It is time that Christ's followers renounce their allegiance to the ever-changing governments of men. They must set an example that there is a higher and more perfect form of government, the Kingdom of Heaven.

Of course there will be consequences. Jesus was brought to Pilate to be crucified on charges of "perverting the nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar, saying that he himself is Christ a King" (Luke 23:2). We, too, must be willing to sacrifice even our very lives to proclaim God's sovereign rulership over us.

Loyalty and Obedience to Christ

When we boldly declare that we belong to God's Kingdom, we are left with no choice but to trust God for His provision in the face of a hostile world. We quickly learn that our safety is in our obedience. To trust in carnal weapons and physical force is vanity. We serve a living God. He is well able to make a way for us regardless of how much the modern day Nebuchadnezzar's rage and threaten to destroy us.

Christians are in no way bound by the Scriptures to obey and support the manmade governments of this world. We are bound to live peaceably with all men to the greatest degree possible. Yet our loyalty, allegiance, and obedience must always be found at the feet of Christ. Our goal is to see souls brought to Christ. The more fully we separate from the world and consecrate ourselves to God, the more power we will have to infiltrate the hearts and minds of men with a living example of the Gospel. The world must see that God does have a people on this earth, and that His power dwells in their midst. Let us commit ourselves to His kingdom and be His people.

Warning: Beware of the Living Bible and the Good News Bible. They are merely Bible paraphrases, not translations. The wording is not true to the original Hebrew and Greek. The scriptures are perverted to support secular Christianity.

paganmonkeyboy

climber
mars...it's near nevada...
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:19pm PT
wasn't jesus a liberal socialist ?

saying the US is a christian nation is like saying raping a cheerleader makes you a boy scout...

don't you think this god dude would judge us as a nation based on how we are acting ? with the hoarding by our rich ruling elite and killing innocents and all that sorta thing...if there is a god, you'd think he's gonna be pissed at US...
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:25pm PT
Skeptic,

Yes I did.

Public Prayer & Displays of Faith:

That is a title that the website author typed. That is not in the Bible. In fact, Christians are instructed to share their faith throughout the Bible. It's the great commission. I think what the website author was eluding to was vain displays of faith.

Example:

"Hey, look at me I'm Holy and Righteous while I pray openly in public with strangers around. Boy, they must think I'm special."

No, they probably don't.





Uh, did you read what you posted?

"Public Prayer & Displays of Faith: And when thou pray, thou shall not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But thou, when thou pray, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret… [Matthew 6:6 & 7]"

Seems like you & others break this one all the time on this forum. Just sayin'...

paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:28pm PT
Out of context? No.

Romans chapter 13 shows modern Christian orthodoxy for what it is: un-Christian.

Your explanation is nothing more than a tap dance around the extremely clear dictates of the chief apologist of your religion.

The long held Christian doctrine of the divine right of kings was put to an end by the founding fathers, that in itself is enough to render them, at least to some degree, un-Christian.

Try again.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:40pm PT
Paganmonkeyboy,


Great question and you are right.


Google and read about Mysterious Babylon.


Hold onto your seat, because it is gonna be a hard one to take.


The USA = Mysterious Babylon. The evidence for this is very clear. No other nation on Earth has the SuperPower like we do and wields its power innappropriately like we do. No other nation has fulfilled all the prophecy concerning Mysterious Babylon except the USA.


GOD, indeed is not happy with us. The USA has lost its way, especially since the Neo-cons have had their way with us. We can and should turn our country around and do whatever we can to do so. I think most of us do indeed want to do this, and we should. We are expected to resist evil in all of its forms.


Someone mentioned up-stream Bush hearing from GOD and being told what to do. No GOD didn't speak to Bush. Bush was listening to Lucifer. I'm sure Bush probably did hear voices -- demonic voices. The good book says that Lucifer can show himself as an Angel of Light. He is a crafty liar. That is why GOD wrote things down. So we wouldn't ever get it wrong. Bush is delussional.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:43pm PT
Paul,

Let's agree to disagree.
jstan

climber
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:48pm PT
Lynne says people claim to be christian who are not.

We have a person on the right here who says catholics are not christians.

We had a whole thread about the morman massacre where it was not at all clear who is/is not a christian.

We have John MacArthur and another such peddlar of biblical sounds accusing the other of not being a true christian.




The word "christian' does not have an agreed upon meaning.

Indeed it never has. This precise dispute has been going on between sects for 2000 years now.

God listens to me and not you. God is on my side.



For 2000 years we have had a struggle for earthly power going on under the guise of a religion -
whatever that is.

Here in the US we have a people enjoying a nation that strives for justice and equality, things that religion cannot tolerate. Religion seeks power, however it is to be gotten.

We have a miracle right before us here on ST.

It is a miracle that people as intelligent as are we can be taking part in a discussion this absurd.
paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:52pm PT
I would agree with all you've said except that the discussion is really very helpful. I'm convinced that minds tend to absorb reasonable information even as they argue against it.
jstan

climber
Mar 13, 2010 - 01:58pm PT
Not when something entirely irrational, like a belief system, is in play.

Belief systems are a Pavlovian tool, designed to bring people to work against the best interests of themselves and their fellows, so as to deliver power.

Slavery was very common in the distant past. I can be convinced christ, who said some good things, was a very courageous young man who paid a terrible price.

I also can be convinced, then as now, others see what he created as a vehicle by which a form of

slavery without chains can be created.

And that is the business they have ever been about.

They are about it, even here on ST.

(Added to a couple of times.)
paganmonkeyboy

climber
mars...it's near nevada...
Mar 13, 2010 - 02:00pm PT
jstan gets it ;-) rock on...
paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Mar 13, 2010 - 02:05pm PT
Look, you may very well be right. I see blind faith as a knitted sweater with a single unnoticed flaw. Pull on that loose thread and the whole thing unravels.

The great flaw in Christian doctrine, that is the loose thread, is Romans 11:32.
jstan

climber
Mar 13, 2010 - 02:15pm PT
Paul, I don't seek to dispel your optimism and hope. Without these there really is very little.

But the two have to be taken in careful measure.

We cannot "hope" a theory of gravitation into existence.

That happens only with hard, and sometimes even unpleasant, WORK.


PS. Yes Kerwin. I did hear you.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 03:22pm PT
Paul,

Concerning Romans 11:32 . . .


http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/k/kjv/kjv-idx?type=DIV1&byte=5015363

Romans 11:25-36 (KJV)
[25] For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
[26] And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
[27] For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
[28] As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
[29] For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
[30] For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief:
[31] Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy.
[32] For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.
[33] O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!
[34] For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counseller?
[35] Or who hath first given to him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again?
[36] For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen.


I hesitate to give out this tool, because it is sometimes too overly simplistic and inaccurate, but it actually does a pretty good job for the book of Romans and it does help to hear maybe the same message as though it were being spoken in today's language . . .


So now in contemporary language . . .



http://www.biblestudytools.com/msg/romans/11.html

Romans 11:25-36 (The way contemporary version. lol)
25 I want to lay all this out on the table as clearly as I can, friends. This is complicated. It would be easy to misinterpret what's going on and arrogantly assume that you're royalty and they're just rabble, out on their ears for good. But that's not it at all. This hardness on the part of insider Israel toward God is temporary. Its effect is to open things up to all the outsiders so that we end up with a full house. 26 Before it's all over, there will be a complete Israel. As it is written, A champion will stride down from the mountain of Zion; he'll clean house in Jacob. 27 And this is my commitment to my people: removal of their sins. 28 From your point of view as you hear and embrace the good news of the Message, it looks like the Jews are God's enemies. But looked at from the long-range perspective of God's overall purpose, they remain God's oldest friends. 29 God's gifts and God's call are under full warranty - never canceled, never rescinded. 30 There was a time not so long ago when you were on the outs with God. But then the Jews slammed the door on him and things opened up for you. 31 Now they are on the outs. But with the door held wide open for you, they have a way back in. 32 In one way or another, God makes sure that we all experience what it means to be outside so that he can personally open the door and welcome us back in. 33 Have you ever come on anything quite like this extravagant generosity of God, this deep, deep wisdom? It's way over our heads. We'll never figure it out. 34 Is there anyone around who can explain God? Anyone smart enough to tell him what to do? 35 Anyone who has done him such a huge favor that God has to ask his advice? 36 Everything comes from him; Everything happens through him; Everything ends up in him. Always glory! Always praise! Yes. Yes. Yes.

So I'm not sure what you meant about Romans 11:32?


32 In one way or another, God makes sure that we all experience what it means to be outside so that he can personally open the door and welcome us back in.


GOD does do that. No body is without blame, and GOD does like to put us in our place, so no one can boast. Salvation is a gift of GOD. We can not ever, ever earn it. No one deserves it. GOD has given it to us freely. All we have to do is ask and let him back into our lives. GOD doesn't want anyone to be able to stand up and say I earned salvation. No, no one ever can. We all fall short of the glory of GOD. Salvation is a gift from GOD.
cintune

climber
the Moon and Antarctica
Mar 13, 2010 - 03:30pm PT
L.J. Washington: I don't really come from outer space.

Jeffrey Goines: Oh. L. J. Washington. He doesn't really come from outer space.

L.J. Washington: Don't mock me my friend. It's a condition of mental divergence. I find myself on the planet Ogo, part of an intellectual elite, preparing to subjugate the barbarian hordes on Pluto. But even though this is a totally convincing reality for me in every way, nevertheless Ogo is actually a construct of my psyche. I am mentally divergent, in that I am escaping certain unnamed realities that plague my life here. When I stop going there, I will be well. Are you also divergent, friend?
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 03:52pm PT
Pictures sometime say it all . . .








paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Mar 13, 2010 - 04:26pm PT
The problem with Romans 11:32 is its solipsistic nature. That is, one (Jew or gentile) must be condemned in order to be saved. It begs the question: what's the point?

It is the source of Augustine's oxymoron "o felix culpa."

Or "my joy is my sin for in it is the glory of my redemption."

It would seem to me that Christian doctrine begins unravelling around this loose thread of nonsense, I must sin to be saved!
gunsmoke

Trad climber
Clackamas, Oregon
Mar 13, 2010 - 05:07pm PT
It would seem to me that Christian doctrine begins unravelling around this loose thread of nonsense, I must sin to be saved!

Christians believe that there is a God and that sin is a deviation from the character of God. While I'm sure there are many variations to the Christian definition of sin, it stands to reason that if there is no God, then there is no sin (in a Christian sense) and therefore no need of salvation.
TripL7

Trad climber
san diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 05:43pm PT
paul roehl- "I must sin to be saved."

"my joy is my sin for in it is the glory of my redemption."

"When the Pharisee's saw this, they said to His disciples 'Why is your Teacher eating with tax collectors and sinner's?' But when Jesus heard this He said 'It is not those who are healthy who need a physician, but those who are sick.' '...for I did not come to call the righteous but sinners " Matthew 9:11-13.

Paul, you must be without sin(sick), one of the righteous(self-righteous).

"o Felix culpa" is not an "oxymoron"!

Because Jesus Christ led/lived a sinless life. And was perfect, and without sin.

For it is Jesus Christ who stands in our place, took our place on the cross, and paid the penalty of our sin's. And it is Jesus Christ who God the Father see's when we come before Him.

God convicts all of their sin.

"For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God..." Romans 3:23.

God's grace is offering forgiveness...all you need to do is recognize your need of it, and receive it(it is a free gift).

Don't be like the self-righteous Pharisee's!
paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Mar 13, 2010 - 06:02pm PT
O felix culpa translates literally to o happy fault. What Romans 11:32, and the great Augustine as well, do is to sing the praise of sin.

It is through sin that salvation is achieved, sin becomes the goodness through which we are saved, bad becomes good and sense is lost.

Here lies the Achilles heel of Christian doctrine. The fundamental problem is the universal nature of original sin and its necessity for the good. Evil requires good; good requires evil.
WBraun

climber
Mar 13, 2010 - 06:10pm PT
Both good and evil work have their reactions, and any reaction binds the performer.
Lissiehoya

climber
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 13, 2010 - 06:36pm PT
Uh, but it's the praises of the original sin, not our individual sins in Augustine's "oh happy fault" because without the original sin of Adam, Christ would not have needed to come to redeem us.

Also, the French Revolution and the American Revolution were very different. Extrapolating from what the French did to the founding fathers of the United States doesn't make any sense.
paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Mar 13, 2010 - 06:44pm PT
Both Revolutions were products of the enlightenment and the realization that the divine right of kings was unreasonable and lacked rational justification.

Both revolutions were fundamentally anti-Christian in their disdain for Romans chapter 13.
TripL7

Trad climber
san diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 06:51pm PT
paul roehl!

He/we are not singing to the praises of sin, but to the grace God gives us to recognize our sin.

Universal nature of original sin because we are all sinner's.

Are you saying that you are able to withstand the temptation that Jesus Christ withstood before Satan? Satan offered Him the whole world. And, evidently he could have delivered it to Him.

Adam and Eve could not reject the offer "for you will be like God..." Genesis 3:5.

Adam and Eve were as perfect as man(kind) could be with free choice. They new God and His love for them. Are you saying that you could enter into the Garden of Eden and not fall.

You are falling prey to the very nature of Adam and Eve's sin, pride. You don't need God, or a Savior.

Are you saying that you should have some other nature other than free choice? There is only one other, and that is to be a puppet.

It is mankinds rejection and following of their own selfish will that has created the mess we are in.

You are given a simple resolve and you reject it.

cintune

climber
the Moon and Antarctica
Mar 13, 2010 - 06:52pm PT
The irony lay in the fact that Louis XVI's funding of the American cause was integral to the financial crisis that prompted the French revolution, all philosophical motivations aside.
paganmonkeyboy

climber
mars...it's near nevada...
Mar 13, 2010 - 07:04pm PT
let's list all the religions where the unbelievers DON'T go to hell...
WBraun

climber
Mar 13, 2010 - 07:06pm PT
You are already in hell.

The whole point of life here is to get out of hell .......
paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Mar 13, 2010 - 07:07pm PT
Your assumption is universal free will, but it's a false assumption.

Humanity acts out of the necessity of its very construction.

It is nature itself that instills us with the desire to eat, procreate and protect ourselves. When a moral directive of prohibition is imposed on those desires/needs, the individual's "will" may be directed by the demands of nature itself. The deck is stacked by the desires imposed on the created by the creator in a kind of entrapment. I don't see free will there.
WBraun

climber
Mar 13, 2010 - 07:11pm PT
Material nature is under direction of a higher order.

Nature is not supreme.

It is subordinate .....
paganmonkeyboy

climber
mars...it's near nevada...
Mar 13, 2010 - 07:16pm PT
doug's gonna be pissed ;-)
TripL7

Trad climber
san diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 07:44pm PT
He desires for you to choose eternal life with Him.

You reject His offer of eternal light/life.

And prefer eternal darkness/death.

Universal free will to choose or reject Him, doesn't get any more simple than that.

So be it.

BTW: He takes people just the way they are, the ones that society rejects ie. prostitutes, perverts, thieves, killers, sodomites, drug addicts etc. He doesn't expect you to change first, He loves you just the way you are...but won't leave you that way!
paganmonkeyboy

climber
mars...it's near nevada...
Mar 13, 2010 - 07:50pm PT
hey tripL - when you take part in communion, you ever wonder what *part* of jesus you are eating ? i asked once when i was in sunday school, as the whole 'eat me and be saved' seemed sorta weird to me...

just curious...
TripL7

Trad climber
san diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 08:25pm PT
It is a spiritual thing.

If you are indeed indwelt with the Holy Spirit/God, and take the communion(represents Christ, and His sacrifice on the cross)in an unworthy manner, for example; "the log in your eye is greater than the speck in your brothers eye" than you will bring judgment upon yourself.

In other words, say your Christian friend is a new believer, and you are nitpicking him about something like memorizing verses or whatever, and you are going to porn sites or hooked on drugs etc., and you take communion and do not confess your problems to God and humble yourself. And you arrogantly puff up yourself as holier than though, then your in for a Holy Spirit buttwhippin.

I have done so and am lucky to be alive to admit it.

God takes His Son's sacrifice for sin very seriously, and expects us to look at our lives and ask for help/confess sin. Particularly at communion/the Lords supper rememberance.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Mar 13, 2010 - 08:31pm PT
These religious posts go on ad nauseam because "believers" do not need or want to use reason or logic. Please do not try to use reason and logic to make your point- it won't work! Just ignore them and perhaps this post will gracefully die.
cintune

climber
the Moon and Antarctica
Mar 13, 2010 - 08:34pm PT
So true. Faith is a troll.
TripL7

Trad climber
san diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 08:39pm PT
Faith isn't a troll, we are all given a measure of faith.
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Mar 13, 2010 - 08:41pm PT
Guns don't kill people. Husbands who come home early do.. ;)
cintune

climber
the Moon and Antarctica
Mar 13, 2010 - 08:41pm PT
Nope, we choose it, or we don't.
TripL7

Trad climber
san diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 08:50pm PT
Scientist/evolutionist believe that something came from nothing(before the Big Bang)i would venture to call that faith.

And actually have come into agreement with St. Augustine in regards to time coming into existence with the Big Bang/Creation(God created time with the creation of the Universe).
cintune

climber
the Moon and Antarctica
Mar 13, 2010 - 09:02pm PT
Please do not try to use reason and logic to make your point-it won't work!

TripL7

Trad climber
san diego
Mar 13, 2010 - 09:12pm PT
JD!

I work in the medical field and through scientific evidence/observation we can rule out certain diagnosis ie. distal radius fx vs a scaphoid fx or a ligament sprain vs a tendon/muscle strain.

Logic and reasoning(nor science)can not 100% rule out the existence of God.

You can admit that you do not know if there is a God, and simply ask Him to come into your heart if He is real, and says He is who He says He is(Jesus Christ).

"For only the fool says, in his heart, there is no God." Psalm 14:1.

jstan

climber
Mar 13, 2010 - 09:15pm PT
Jim is correct that believers receive no communication from us and never rationally examine themselves.

The bible sounds like a fairy tale because that is its function and young childen are the demographic it targets. The use of a snake in the story of original sin hinges upon a quite wide aversion humans have for snakes based, I suspect, upon a form we had long ago in our evolutionary past before becoming a primate. This is a clear attempt to hook into the mind. Young children are in the process of wiring their brains so modifications made on them can never be cast off or questioned. It is a form of intentionally inflicted life-long dependency.

Indeed the frequency with which believers exhort others to read the bible indicates their reaction to those texts is entirely unlike the reaction a normally wired brain encounters. The texts also, to this observer at least, seem to function almost as self hypnosis and serve the purpose of resonating with a person's dependency.

I think if an experiment were done in which EKG's were taken while believers were reciting "their favorite bible passage" much could be learned and the patterns could be compared to those with other forms of this malady.

Obedience is the intended result.

To be used to advance the interests of persons unspecified.

You look at the never ending conflict between those claiming to be "true believers" over the past millennia and you see a competition between those hoping to get into their own hands

the wires of control.


While such a dependent state can in principle be used to advance the welfare of all, the fact that it can also be ill- used and will be so sought argues that this is a high risk approach for the advancement of good. Better to educate the mind and let each person make their own rational choices as to how the personal and general self interest is to be advanced.

Trust the good that exists in people

instead.
jstan

climber
Mar 13, 2010 - 11:48pm PT
"Why won't they stop, and join the real world"

Why does an alcoholic not stop drinking?

The ethanol helps them get through the day.

The corporation producing the spirits just keeps going to the bank.
vlani

Trad climber
mountain view, ca
Mar 13, 2010 - 11:50pm PT
There is a difference between knowledge and believe. Knowledge is something you know, believe is something you don't.

Human brain is a fine instrument, can be used to discover world, or equally so to dream it. There is no way to tell the difference from inside.

So you have to believe one simple thing – is the world really exists, or you are dreaming. The rest follows easily
jstan

climber
Mar 13, 2010 - 11:51pm PT
Vlani:
Ever hit your thumb with a hammer?

Try it.

Clearly is not a dream.

Maybe a nightmare.
vlani

Trad climber
mountain view, ca
Mar 14, 2010 - 12:04am PT
Ever tried imagining hitting thumb with the hummer? It may work too.

The better illustration to this idea is that stupid Matrix movie.

But anyways, person capable of thinking with some effort will conclude that – there is no room for imagined characters in the real world. If the World is there – there is no God in it.
And vice versa. If there is God the way Christianity treats it – there is no reality, it is all dream. You are God and God is you, and all you do is dreaming. Or call it nightmare if you like. The rest is not worth arguing – you are the creator of your dreams, anything you can imagine is there – hell, heaven, hammers hitting thumbs and water-walking, whatever.

Everyone is on his own here to decide. There is no proof.
WBraun

climber
Mar 14, 2010 - 12:09am PT
vlani -- "You are God and God is you ...."

That is the mayavadi theory and is false.

It is the most dangerous theory of them all.
jstan

climber
Mar 14, 2010 - 12:11am PT
Vlani:
Now you are pulling my leg.
vlani

Trad climber
mountain view, ca
Mar 14, 2010 - 11:00am PT
Thinking is very dangerous for religious people, Warner. They may loose their faith – the worst thing to ever happen, from the church prospective. Churches used to kill for that and will do it again, given the chance.
Skeptimistic

Mountain climber
Mar 14, 2010 - 02:42pm PT
"They may loose their faith – the worst thing to ever happen.."

I completely agree here. It then spills out and is nearly impossible remove.

If it's such a great thing, then why isn't everyone flocking to get in on it? Seems better to lead by example and inflict... er... guide those who want to find out more to your source.

Let us "sinners" live our own lives and let "god" sort it all out in the end.
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Mar 14, 2010 - 03:40pm PT
There's an interesting thought piece in the Huffington Post today titled, "Why Religion Needs Atheism". It specifially notes that it doesn't mean fundamentalist atheism which has evolved in reaction to religious fundamentalism (indeed we see a lot of both on ST), but rather to a thought provoking dialogue about the potential of humanity and the creative space between different views on the subject.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/samir-selmanovic/religion-needs-atheism_b_498051.html
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 14, 2010 - 03:56pm PT
Jan,

Thanks. Interesting article.



Atheists meet in Melbourne to celebrate lack of faith
More than 2,000 atheists from around the world are gathering in Melbourne, Australia, to celebrate their lack of religious belief.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8563583.stm


Wow, sounds like they are coming together to worship their lack of faith, and their belief that there is no GOD.

You can not scientifically invalidate GOD. So, fundamentally atheism is not science, it is a faith system.



Some verses in the good book comes to mind . . .



Pss.14
[1] The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

Pss.53
[1] The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good.

Rom.1
[21] Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 14, 2010 - 04:09pm PT
WC,

I'll repeat it for you, since you apparently didn't read it the first time.



You can not scientifically invalidate GOD. So, fundamentally atheism is not science, it is a faith system.




Prove me wrong.
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Mar 14, 2010 - 04:15pm PT
Perhaps I'll decide to believe in solipsism. You're all figments of my extremely lively imagination.
paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Mar 14, 2010 - 04:16pm PT
The problem with that statement is it lacks a definition. What is meant by God?
No one can prove there isn't an ultimate creative force in the universe, but one can certainly prove that there is no Jehovah.
vlani

Trad climber
mountain view, ca
Mar 14, 2010 - 04:18pm PT
Mighty Hiker - not yours, your computers :)
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 14, 2010 - 04:26pm PT
Paul,

You said . . .





The problem with that statement is it lacks a definition. What is meant by God?
No one can prove there isn't an ultimate creative force in the universe, but one can certainly prove that there is no Jehovah.





one can certainly prove that there is no Jehovah.



Wow! Please do so. I'm listening. Prove it. I'll give you all the time you need . . .
vlani

Trad climber
mountain view, ca
Mar 14, 2010 - 04:50pm PT
Klimmer, you are wrong about atheism been a faith. Do you believe Santa does exist? Probably not. Can you prove it? I bet no.

Atheism does not consider God a worthy idea, as there is zilch evidence behind it. That's all.

There are tons of other ideas rejected for lack of evidence, you can call all those rejects 'faith' if you like. But that is your own understanding of the word, other people usually go with different definition of it
paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Mar 14, 2010 - 04:55pm PT
It's simple, if the biblical account of creation and Christ is, as it claims, exclusively true then all other mythologies (hundreds, if not thousands) are untrue.

Billions of individuals are mistaken in their accounts of creation from the Zoroastrians to the Buddhists to the aboriginal peoples of Australia.

All over the world people are mistaken in their mythical accounts of creation and the nature of god: how can that be? If only one belief system is correct then how do we discern which it is?

By declaring his exclusivity as the one true God Jehovah condemns all others to eternal separation. Logically this makes little sense. How can so many be wrong in their explanation of cosmology? How can so many be excluded? The diversity of myth, in and of itself, mediates against the truth of any particular belief system particularly those that are absolutely exclusive!
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Mar 14, 2010 - 05:04pm PT
And now another interesting article critiquing the elistism of modern atheists and Christopher Hitchens in particular, directed especially at the scientific and academic communities. Below, the reference and a quote.


A Little Matter of Science, Superiority, and Racism: New Atheism's Dangerous Waters

My challenge to the atheist community is this: I know that there are atheists out there, who, like Carl Sagan, revel in the wonder of the manifest universe and can imbue some of that wonder upon all of us. Let's hear the positive voices of your community, lest the dialogue be dominated by those who only are out to pick a fight, to point out the flaws, or claim superiority when none exists.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-schrei/a-little-matter-of-scienc_b_487325.html
jstan

climber
Mar 14, 2010 - 05:26pm PT
Vlani has pretty well shown the way, Klimmer.

THREE possible spiritual states exist. Not just two.

1. You can believe a god exists.
2. You can believe no gods exist.
3. You can accept you have no real data either way. And you can observe that no one has ever seen direct material evidence for any action by a god. Any god. Since there has been no such, there is no adverse effect to living your life independent of the question. I have said just this before, and I repeat it here.

Klimmer your statement is true if I look up atheism in the dictionary. But you statement does not describe the discussion we are having here. Your statement is a red herring.

We are not atheists. We are people who see no evidence either way

AND

see no evidence any god has ever had a direct effect upon anything in the material world.

People such as ourselves have been burnt at the stake by believers who by some magic think torturing and killing will get them into heaven.

I look at the good things christ has advised and I come away persuaded

there is a chance you may, one day, be very surprised.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 14, 2010 - 06:07pm PT
Yes, Agnosticism is a better frame of mind. It is an honest frame. Agnostics are saying "I Do Not Know." To say there is no GOD, or GODs, to be atheist is an exercise in faith. Like I said, you can not disprove, invalidate the existance of GOD. To say there is no GOD, is to be academically and scientifically dishonest. The scientific method is a method of invalidation. If you can not invalidate the existance of GOD, then you can not say no GOD exists. Fundamentalist Atheists believe there is no GOD of any kind. That is faith. To believe something you can not prove.

Atheism is a system of faith. It is a belief system. Just like any other religious faith.

However, the evidence of GOD through his word, the entire Universe surrounding us, the fulfillment of prophecy, the historical evidence of Biblical Archeology, the absolute modern miracle of Bible Code that has been proved statistically to be way, way beyond chance, Theistic Evolution, (yes, those who believe and have faith and do science are making grounds and coming to the same point and coming to agreement), the fact that millions of lives are changed personally throughout the world for the better are evidences that can not be dismissed and over-looked and pushed aside. The evidence is building and getting more overwhelming as time goes on. I would say it is going to get very overwhelming soon. But there will be those who will never believe because they do not want to beleive. There are those who hate GOD. Their minds and their hearts are seared closed. The good book has a great deal to say about this condition. Perhaps something can still open those closed minds and hearts? I do not know.

Are there those who misuse and claim to be who they are not and misrepresent the truth, and abuse the Christian faith, sure there are. Jesus said this would happen. "You will know them by their Fruit." In other words, you will know them by the things they do in their lives whether they are real or not. Do they put their faith into action? Do they fight for Social Justice? Do they do the right moral and ethical thing according to GODs laws? If they hate, start wars, lie, corrupt government, etc. then they are not who they say they are.
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Mar 14, 2010 - 06:16pm PT
There is only one God; and Muhammed is his messenger.
Please disprove.
vlani

Trad climber
mountain view, ca
Mar 14, 2010 - 06:33pm PT
Klimmer, you obviously know nothing about science and how it works.

To say there is GOD, is to be academically and scientifically dishonest. To say the opposite is just fine

You can say "let as ASSUME there is god" though, and see what follows. Not much, actually.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 14, 2010 - 06:41pm PT
MH,

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam we all beleive in the same GOD. We are brothers and sisters so to speak in faith in one true GOD, the GOD of Abraham. Do we have differences? Sure.

Islam believes Jesus is a Prophet but, Mohammed is the true prophet. Christianity believes Jesus Christ is Emmanuel, God with us, and our savior. Most would say that Mohammed was a very upright and moral man.

We have more in common than say those with faith, and those without who may be atheist do.


Can I disprove your question and statment? No. It is taken on faith. But there is evidence! I would say one comes to decide who is right and who is wrong in faith, by careful comparison and evidences. I have always been a proponent of people taking a World Religion course of study. We should all know more than we do about one another's faith. Will we agree on everything? No. Is it right to let differences spring into hate, murder, and wars? No. Any true believer whether it be Judaism, Christainity, or Islam knows the message of peace.

One can argue and say, well in the old testament, GOD led the children of Isreal into war against many enemies surrounding them. True. But a careful study will show that many of those people were Nephalim, the off-spring of Angels and Man. They were never meant to be according to GOD's original plan. Do I understand it all? No. I have a great deal of many questions. But I trust GOD. He will let us know in due time the mysteries of the Universe. Some he even allows us to figure out. I can't help but think that, that pleases GOD. It must be wonderful for GOD to see his creation at times figuring it out. We are brlliantly smart sometimes. I can't help but think it is inspired and it brings a smile to his face.
vlani

Trad climber
mountain view, ca
Mar 14, 2010 - 06:48pm PT
And who are those angels guys? May we study their DNA? Do they have any?

I always suspected that those 5.12R climbers have some devil blood in them.

PS.. Good stuff you smokin’! Me wants some!
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 14, 2010 - 06:50pm PT
vlani,



Klimmer, you obviously know nothing about science and how it works.

To say there is GOD, is to be academically and scientifically dishonest. To say the opposite is just fine

You can say "let as ASSUME there is god" though, and see what follows. Not much, actually.



You are trying to put words in my mouth. I never said I can scientifically prove that GOD exists, and with science I can prove GOD is. There is evidence, however, if you were honest about it though. In science, theories are backed with empirical evidence. A theory is not yet proven. Some theories do have more evidence than others. It isn't a scientific law. The evidence is building. I think at some time it will be massively overwhelming though. We will all know then. At that point it will not be a matter of faith any more ;-)
vlani

Trad climber
mountain view, ca
Mar 14, 2010 - 06:53pm PT

Sorry Klimmer man, cannot take your trolling seriously any more. You win :))
WBraun

climber
Mar 14, 2010 - 06:57pm PT
Oh ...

They are just sitting in a dark room with no sunlight.

I tell them to come out and you'll see the sun.

The rascals will just say ......

“Where is the proof that there is light? First prove it to me; then I will come out.”

This is the sum substance of their so called scientific rascal-dumb ......
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Full Silos of Iowa
Mar 14, 2010 - 07:06pm PT
Oh my goodness, he's back!!

http://supertopo.com/climbing/thread.php?topic_id=1083108&msg=1116783#msg1116783

Wasn't gone for long. Was he?

What a joke!

He's a troll king and you guys are troll feeders!

Troll feeders.
Troll feeders.
Troll feeders.

Look how you spent your whole afternoon!
vlani

Trad climber
mountain view, ca
Mar 14, 2010 - 07:25pm PT
Donnow about Iowa, but here in Cali it.. hm.. was a perfect day for climbing. Why not to feed some fine animals if you stuck by the F'ing PC..
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Full Silos of Iowa
Mar 14, 2010 - 07:27pm PT
Oh, Brawny, I see, too, that you're still up to the same ol same ol.

Well, let me repeat: Life IS mechanistic (cause n effect throughout) and mortal AND it IS worth taking on!

Adapt. Upgrade your brain software. (Buddha, like Paul, lived millenia ago.)



Vlani- Don't know you, but only my Avatar is from Iowa. But you're right, it was a FINE climbing day... and FINE skiing day!


Let me say: I thank God Hypercrates (deification of fate, cf: Grim Reaper, deification of death) everyday for the age I live in and the blessings of them: camalots, internal combustion engines (won't exist for long), corrective contact lenses, hernia repair how-to technology, etc. Thank God Hypercrates for these things and a million more. Long live science and engineering and technology and the savvy to use them wisely!
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Full Silos of Iowa
Mar 14, 2010 - 07:39pm PT
Weschrist- Try calling them on their God. It works. I'm only repeating this again because Paul above (a rarity) did it.

Above, the troll king said, Prove it. Well, His "God" is the God of Moses (aka Jehovah aka Yahweh). He's a local Mesopotamian God. Like a dozen others. The troll king's God is not the metaphorical God of Einstein or the nameless deist God of Jefferson, etc.

We have to stop "dangling deities'. Compare: "dangling participles" or "dangling numbers" without units. (Unless we want to needlessly argue- that might be the goal on a boring afternoon for some.)

One can disprove Jehovah in the same way he disproves Aphrodite (say, arising from sea foam). Take into account the human factor (to misunderstand, deceive, lie, tell fictional stories, overstate, etc.) in the thinking and voila, proof. At least it's "reasonable" proof to all but the most anal mathematicians, philosophers, and logicians.

This thread's 3rd grade.

EDIT By the way, your anonymous quote above is spot on. It's one of my favorites. Soon there will be a new institution or two for "believers" of another kind to embrace-- So they won't have to fall back on this awful "atheist" label. Which supernaturalists love. But why so many irreligious or post-religious (even Dawkins!) continue to use the term amazes me to no end.

Christians are atheists, too.
Jingy

Social climber
Nowhere
Mar 14, 2010 - 07:39pm PT
you mean like this kind of christian nation??:

http://le.utah.gov/~2010/bills/hbillenr/hb0012.pdf - pdf

http://le.utah.gov/~2010/bills/hbillint/hb0012.htm - Web page



jstan

climber
Mar 14, 2010 - 07:41pm PT
"A theory is not yet proven. Some theories do have more evidence than others. It isn't a scientific law."

I have problems with this. Again words are making communication unlikely.

There really is no such thing as "a scientific law." A law being something that can be shown never to be violated. Since we can not measure to infinite precision we can not ever declare anything to be "absolutely true." Absolute truth is a fiction. An imagining.

Now that I use that word, I wonder if god is not "an imagining." Perhaps.

If you will consider that in the late 19th century everyone spoke of laws. Newton's law, Maxwell's laws, the laws of thermodynamics. At the time some leaders even claimed all was known. Only the precision of the measurements had to be improved. Lo and behold, everything changed when there were better measurements. By 1905 Einstein's works were not called Einstein's Law. The mess Planck got us into trying to understand infrared and the ultraviolet catastrophy had spilt the milk.

Things are much better now. Right now I understand we are only separated by ten to the 120th power from being able to understand "Everything". Even so no one is running around waving their arms. No one is bent over a candle praying for help. Everyone is excited and working hard. I suspect it has never before been quite this interesting. People can taste it.

And we really need to stop using the word "theory." It is a good word but people are loading unintended baggage onto it. Use the word "model." We have a certain way of looking at a phenomenon and it allows results to be calculated that agree pretty well with measurements. First thing one does is to wonder why it does not agree to the statistical precision of the data. Then lo and behold a new term has to be loaded into the calculation to get better agreement. Then the theorists go off and come up with a better model for the world that just has to have that term in it. No choice about it. None. Zip.

At no identifiable point is this evolutionary process going to stop. Can't. Because infinite precision isn't possible, in a practical material world - which is where we live. I know I do because JL keeps telling me I do.

There is an old saying that is undeniably funny and disturbingly apt.

"The only person who believes a theory, is the theorist.

The only person who does not believe a measurement, is the experimentalist."

Thinkabboudit.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 14, 2010 - 07:55pm PT
You clearly need to know the difference between a scientific hypothesis (educated guess that is testable), scientific theory, and scientific law.

Crack open any good science text and review.
WBraun

climber
Mar 14, 2010 - 08:02pm PT
All the evidence is there that God exists.

He has been proven for billions of year, more years than any computer can hold.

Modern science lives in the cold dark room of nescience, anchored and oblivious of the existence of the individual soul, stubbornly holding onto their foolish mental speculations and theories fabricated in their fertile brains.

Constantly bewildered by the influence of ignorance they mislead the whole world into nihilism and attachment only to the gross physical domain.

Ignorance, illusion, and false pride is their only master.
jstan

climber
Mar 14, 2010 - 08:04pm PT
Oh my goodness! I have been like so waiting for the easter bunny in this thread!

When you have to understand something and are tempted to suppose an easter bunny or even a god so as to avoid admitting you have been defeated, Occam’s Razor is a practical rule of thumb people use to choose among courses of action. While it has probably been known for 3000 years or more FRIAR William Ockham posed it very succinctly. Read and enjoy.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor


Occam's razor (or Ockham's razor[1]), is the meta-theoretical principle that "entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity" (entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem) and the conclusion thereof, that

the simplest solution is usually the correct one.

The principle is attributed to 14th-century English logician, theologian and Franciscan friar, William of Ockham. Occam's razor may be alternatively phrased as pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate ("plurality should not be posited without necessity")[2].

The principle is often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae (translating to the law of parsimony, law of economy or law of succinctness).

When competing hypotheses are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selection of the hypothesis that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities while still sufficiently answering the question. It is in this sense that Occam's razor is usually understood.

To quote Isaac Newton, "We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes."[3]

In science, Occam’s razor is used as a heuristic (rule of thumb) to guide scientists in the development of theoretical models rather than as an arbiter between published models.[4][5] In the scientific method, Occam's razor is not considered an irrefutable principle of logic, and certainly not a scientific result.[6][7][8][9]


Edit:
Werner said:
"All the evidence is there that God exists.

He has been proven for billions of year, more years than any computer can hold."

Minor point first. Werner knows better than do I a computer holds "1's" and "0's" not years. How many years can be stored in binary code depends upon the representation or units you use to translate into that code. Numbers of seconds, nanoseconds etc. If you have 64 bit memory you have access to about 2e19 locations. You go to a 128 bit memory and you have about 3e38 locations.

A billion(in years) is 1e9. If you want to count each nanosecond that is 1e18, still doable.

Now to the central point. Had Werner said "God has existed for billions of years( as shown by four billion year old rocks we are examining today) I would have asked what property of the rocks could only have been produced with the assistance of a god. Maybe a "G" quality stamp somewhere? I would not ask to see the production paperwork.

But he did not say that. He said the "fact was proven" billions of years ago. Everything we have seen indicates only bacteria or single celled organisms existed on earth billions of years ago. For "ALL evidence" to point in a direction opposite to that pointed by all the evidence now available there has to be a huge burden of proof on Werner to support his statement. We need to see evidence that a bacteria or single celled organism witnessed the creation of a god.

What form could that evidence take? As best we can tell our work with bacteria and protozoa today suggests, they at least, do not leave written records. We probably won't find any file cabinets of written records from creatures that lived a billion years ago.

I am forced here to violate Occam's Razor and wonder if we can gain access to file cabinets kept by intergalactic aliens. Fattrad has promised to introduce me to some very special people next week. With any luck they may be aliens. I am prety sure Jeff has been consorting with aliens for quite some time. I will ask to see their records on when god came into existence.

I'll get back to you.
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Mar 14, 2010 - 08:12pm PT
klimmer: You clearly need to know the difference between a scientific hypothesis (educated guess that is testable), scientific theory, and scientific law.
Yup, you certainly do.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 14, 2010 - 08:20pm PT
Here I'll help you:
scientific hypothesis, theory, and law . . .

http://chemistry.about.com/od/chemistry101/a/lawtheory.htm


Gee, I only teach this stuff day in and day out.
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Mar 14, 2010 - 08:27pm PT
Klimmer, you perennially post at great length about your beliefs, claiming that they are hypotheses if not theories. Enough said.

I liked what jstan said about saying "model" instead of theory, though. Less for the uninformed to trip themselves up on. Though those who require certainty will no doubt continue to believe.
vlani

Trad climber
mountain view, ca
Mar 14, 2010 - 09:00pm PT
Werner, you again forgotten to say "booo".

Do not mean to hurt anyone’s feelings, but the arguments are getting more and more funny :))
WBraun

climber
Mar 14, 2010 - 10:07pm PT
God never ever disappears.

Only a blind man can't "see".

We know you're really a closet theists.

Don't deny it now .........

WBraun

climber
Mar 14, 2010 - 10:22pm PT
No no no

Billions and billions of years of history. More year numbers than any computer can hold.

You have not been everywhere. Still you make childish mental speculative statements about God.

You are an insignificant insect and still you make childish statements that there is no God, has never been proven, there's no shred of evidence, and on and on.

This what children do ...........

All the proof and evidence is right there in front of you, still you are blind man.
vlani

Trad climber
mountain view, ca
Mar 14, 2010 - 10:26pm PT
Why "him"? Would not "it" be more appropriate? Your take of God The Mighty is so sexist! Or may be just medieval? ;))
gunsmoke

Trad climber
Clackamas, Oregon
Mar 14, 2010 - 10:28pm PT
This thread has totally deteriorated. Werner, if anyone else has anything of value to say, send me an email.
Lynne Leichtfuss

Sport climber
Will know soon
Mar 15, 2010 - 12:12am PT
jstan from above posts....who is a christian? It's not complicated. Jesus asks us to love God with your all and Love your neighbor as yourself.

Yeh, if this old world and the inhabitants would just do it, the planet would be changed in an incredibly positive direction.

Peace to all on a Sunday night that is a gift to each of us. We are alive and it is ours to enjoy, have joy, experience peace, and as James Taylor sings so eloquently,,,,"love the ones you love". lynnie
Largo

Sport climber
The Big Wide Open Face
Mar 15, 2010 - 02:34am PT
3. You can accept you have no real data either way. And you can observe that no one has ever seen direct material evidence for any action by a god. Any god. Since there has been no such, there is no adverse effect to living your life independent of the question. I have said just this before, and I repeat it here.
-


What this underscores is what we always run up against here - namely, that in discussing any of these issues, we naturally use our evaluating minds. The very nature of that mind is to evaluate, meaning we have to have some material substance to measure, lest what we are talking about is not "real," i.e., material.

This inevitably leads to several dead ends. It never or at least rarely occurs to people that there are ways of knowing other than by what the evaluating mind can offer. Next comes the belief that whatever cannot be evaluated by this mind cannot be real. But this is simply the evaluating mind saying that unless it's criteria can be met (get me matter to measure), what we're talking about is perforce fiction, fairy tales, delusions, and mere ideas, feelings, sensations, and so forth. But spirituality is not beholden to materialists, which is the only problem materialists ever have with "religion," that God is not a "thing" that can be subjected to scientific (measuring) protocols.

Materialism makes perfect sense. Without a firm grasp of how materialism works, we don't survive, period. If someone doesn't believe in materialism, they just don't believe that an ass will kick your teeth in if you get behind it and make a bunch of noise - but they'll understand it immediately if it is their teeth.

But to think material is the all and everything, that every sage from the beginning of time has been completely delusional about all things spiritual, or the biggest laugher of them all, that every spiritual person has consciously avoided rational introspection of themselves, is in my experience, wildly myopic and narcissistic. But most of all, it's a terrible example of people betting against themselves, against their own capacities and birthrights as spiritual beings having a human (material) experience.

In trying to codify the All into doctrine, things have often gotten way out of whack and the world has suffered mightily. But thinking that the all is doctrine is IMO wildly mistaken.

It really is "ungraspable," which will never do to the evaluating mind, and that, in the end, is why all of these discussions are circular by their very nature.

JL
jstan

climber
Mar 15, 2010 - 03:32am PT
Appreciate your effort here John. Truly. If you feel there is value in "spiritual", I have to try and understand.

I have sensations. I have changes in mood. I have thrilling moments where I somehow feel, what's a word, higher? Very occasionally, and I mean very, I am amazed that I understood something more quickly than expected. (Frankly, only once or twice if the truth be known.)

I would not describe any of them as "spiritual". Why not? When using language you can use a word productively only when the meaning has been made definite. If you describe six experiences to two people and those two people agree on only three as to whether they were spiritual - our use of the word has acted to defeat communication. Not the purpose of language.

If you can define this word for me such that I can separate spiritual experiences from the non-spiritual, then I can use the word - with you. No one else - quite probably. It will be your definition.

Of course we all can have amazing and widely diverse states of mind, moods, whatever. The brain is constructed to adapt. The brain is a survival instrument. Of course people can develop amazing mental abilities. But they are all confined to the body of the person. It can feel as though a higher power has been communicated with. But that feeling is confined to that body. (I know people can read faces and determine I am in a b' state. That's a visual communication.) But this is an argument you have heard from others, I have read those discussions.

The mind is capable of much. But there is also much the mind is not capable of. Until we have defined what goes where your higher state argument will remain not understood.

As to my belief people with certain approaches do not successfully practice introspection, the truth is at one point of another all fall into that category. But I ask you, how do you deal with the claim facts are unimportant. Only perceptions(feelings/interpretations?) are important. And at the same time this claim cannot be intellectually discussed?

We all are used to meeting blank walls. But frankly, there are blank walls and then there are some REALLY blank walls. The blank walls are the reason I do all of this typing. I hope to get better at scaling them.
Largo

Sport climber
The Big Wide Open Face
Mar 15, 2010 - 04:34am PT
"Until we have defined what goes where your higher state argument will remain not understood."

"Defined" here is another word for "measurable," and "understood" is another word for "explainable in terms of matter, or discernable sense data."

What am talking about is not a state, but rather, the emptiness from which all states arise, and in time, into which they return. So I'm not talking about a higher or a lower state of "mind," of consciousness or anything like that.

A start inth investigation is to just watch how the evaluating mind graps after some content, some thing, some feeling orf state or something we can describe or define in agreed upon terms. Can you see the mind doing this?

Now is the seeing and the content the same things? And what is meant by the statement that the brain doesn't produce this seeing, and that this seeing is not a function of the brain - nor is it something separte either.

JL
WBraun

climber
Mar 15, 2010 - 12:47pm PT
Oh

You don't like unitless (dimensionless) numbers.

Material world: 1-1=0 1+1=2

Spiritual world 1-1=1 1+1=1
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 15, 2010 - 12:58pm PT
You know sometimes I wish GOD would allow just a few from Heaven to post up on a Forum site like ST.


Sir Isaac Newton would have a great amount to say: 3 Laws of Motion, Calculas, Universal Law of Gravity, helped further develope the Scientific Method, the Physics of Light, developed the Mirror Telescope, etc. etc. and he had sincere Faith in GOD, very sincere belief in the Bible, knew GOD had a code in his word and searched for it diligently didn't find it (but in our day it has been discovered), and predicted the end of the world according to his interpretation and insight into the Word of GOD, the Bible, and he predicted it to be 2060 AD.



Yea, I'd like to see you throw all your ad hominem attacks at SIR ISAAC NEWTON.


Don't try to throwout the really lame and ignorant excuse "Oh, he only believed because that's what everyone did. He had to. He was forced to. It was dangerous not to be a believer." No he thought for himself.

Get real. Expand your mind. Open your eyes. Look at all the evidence throughout the Universe around you. You are without excuse as the good book says.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Full Silos of Iowa
Mar 15, 2010 - 01:15pm PT
http://supertopo.com/climbing/thread.php?topic_id=1083108&msg=1116783#msg1116783



Glad to hear, Weschrist. It's only because American culture has been so monolithic in theology, the Abrahamic religious get away with it.

I just wish more of the irreligious or post-religious would pick up on this and stop letting the Abrahamic religious frame the conversation and steer it where they want.

Christians and Muslims are atheists, too. Also, they're nonbelievers. Spread the word. Start calling them out on it.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Full Silos of Iowa
Mar 15, 2010 - 01:15pm PT
http://supertopo.com/climbing/thread.php?topic_id=1083108&msg=1116783#msg1116783

What happened?!


Think globally, act locally.

Were you a science teacher in my community, I'd be proactively working to get you removed.


Ghandi: Be the change you seek in the world.
Klimmer

Mountain climber
San Diego
Mar 15, 2010 - 01:21pm PT
Yes HFCS,

And you are certainly a cause. And you are one of the most hateful posters I have seen on ST.

At least I argue with substance and evidence, and I do not personally attack another and call them names.

Debate with civility. Try it sometime.


Case in point:



Were you a science teacher in my community, I'd be proactively working to get you removed.



I would suppose next that you would start gathering up all believers, with the exception of those you think are worthy, and then have them all shot at gun point in your Utopian world.

HFCS you are full of hate. GOD will forgive you. I forgive you. Seek help, perhaps anger management class also.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Full Silos of Iowa
Mar 15, 2010 - 01:23pm PT
The King Troll wrote-
"...one of the most hateful posters I..."

Yes, I got the talking points memo through the underground many months ago. "Hater" is the fundamentalist Christian's latest "attack" word.

Go away.

At least I argue with substance and evidence

Rich! Hence my opening comment above.
WBraun

climber
Mar 15, 2010 - 01:28pm PT
Ghandi: Be the change you seek in the world.


Ghandi blew it completely.

He preached ahimsa (nonviolence) and was killed by violence.

No balance, as you need himsa (violence) also.

When the good doctor goes to repair the damaged body he creates violence against the body in order to repair it.

Lopsidedness is not intelligence.
klk

Trad climber
cali
Mar 15, 2010 - 01:29pm PT
i avoid these threads, but i have 9unfortunately) published recently on a related topic so feel guilted into a couple of quick posts-- i'll do this as two separate and quick notes.

First, on religious and political history and terminology: As Lissie notes, most folks in current debates use "Christian" as if it had a stable and obvious meaning, then anachronistically project their current sense of the term onto distant places and people. The term "deist" appeared in the 17th century, but used differently than it is now. By the 19th century, historians of religion were using "deist" to refer to a new group of intellectuals associated with the Enlightenment who had moved away from key elements of period Christianity. Jefferson, Paine, and even Franklin are better described as Deists than as Christians in their theology. (There is currently a sense in the serious literature that our labels are less useful for serious work than we;'d like, but for our purposes here on the old ivy-covered Supertopo, where a remedial survey level of discourse would be an accomplishment, they still work just fine.)

Second, on the literature: The best quick survey of US religious history is Jon Butler's Awash in a Sea of Faith. For anyone genuinely interested in the serious historical work on period American intellectual history, Henry May's Enlightenment in America remains a good starting point. A bit dated now, but it's a classic for a reason. And for those interested in the way that popular religion-- especially millenarian Protestantism --worked in the revolutionary period, Ruth Bloch's Visionary Republic remains important.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Full Silos of Iowa
Mar 15, 2010 - 01:38pm PT
K- Isn't it astonishing you find more coverups-untruths-hoaxes than anyone can shake a stick at. Except when it comes to the greatest one of all!

Has anyone else noticed this mother of all ironies besides me. Regarding this fundamentalist Christian.

Why didn't you stick to your letter. Doesn't your word count?

http://supertopo.com/climbing/thread.php?topic_id=1083108&msg=1116783#msg1116783

Geez. I mean, it was only dated just a couple days ago.


It's the internet-driven information age. "It's Ovah for Jehovah." (Say it ten times so it sinks in deep.) It's over for all local tribal Mesopotamian Gods.

But if anyone wants to talk about Diacrates (the one Einstein speculated about) or Hypercrates (personification of fate / destiny: cf: Grim Reaper, personification of death), I'd love to.

K- too much time pouring over bible code, you spent. Go climbing. Go to school on Huston Smith's The World's Religions. Adapt. Upgrade.
klk

Trad climber
cali
Mar 15, 2010 - 01:41pm PT
On "Christian Nation." The phrase itself is old, but it's only recently that it's emerged as a bit of historical jargon or political art. The key figure was a UC Berkeley and GTU graduate named Rousas Rushdooney who began to argue late '50s, early '60s) that the conventional accounts of the United States as a constitutional republic, grounded in a social contract amon rulers and ruled, based on natural law as understood by period ENlightnment science, was a Satanic fraud. The US, said Rushdooney, was not a constitutional republic but rather a "Christian Nation" that had inherited Israel's original covenant of the Old Testament. That covenant had been obscured by demonic and Satanic forces-- ancient Greece and Rome, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the Scientific Revolution, etc.--which had found their way into American political and legal culture and which had to be expunged.

Rushdooney and his followers believed that America's Enlightenment heritage had to be cast out so that the nation could return to Biblical Law (he thought that any Old Testament proscription remained binding unless specifically rescinded by the New Testament).

Since by the 1960s even most conservatives thought that stoning adulterers was probably a bit much, and since it seemed a bit on the wingnut side to talk about Jefferson as a Satanist, kinder and gentler forms of Rushdooney's claims began to appear in the 1980s, especially in the work of David Barton who attempted to write "history" books showing that all the Founders (including Jefferson and Franklin) were really 20th -century style Christian fundamentalists. Barton's "quotations" made it into any number of high-level speeches, he himself became number 2 of the Texas State GOP, and even Rushdooney's institution, The Chalcedon Foundation, became a player in D.C.

So when that member of the TX State BoE steps up and proudly claims to have removed Jefferson and the Enlightenment from history textbooks, we aren't just in the presence of the typical flat-earther-let's-end-science-ed-in-public-schools Bible thumper. This guy, and presumably some of his colleagues, are genuine "conservatives" in the old European sense of the word; They not only don't believe in parliamentary democracy or that the US is a constitutional republic; they believe that the very idea of a constitutional republic is a fabrication by Satanists.

Since we're Americans and like our tragedies (and farces) to have a happy ending, here's a bit of good news: The return to Biblical Law (execution for adultery, drunkenness, cursing, masturbation, oral and anal sex, witchcraft, usury, etc.) would mean that virtually all the posters on ST would be killed, so we'd have no more threads like this one.
dktem

Trad climber
Temecula
Mar 15, 2010 - 01:59pm PT
Informative post, klk. Thanks!

High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Full Silos of Iowa
Mar 15, 2010 - 02:00pm PT
WBrawn- Well, we finally agree on something you wrote. I knew it was just a function of time.

I quoted Ghandi on one point: "Be the change you seek in the world." You won't hear me quote him on being a pacifist in a nature red in tooth and claw.

We agree!
paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Mar 15, 2010 - 02:10pm PT
People keep complaining about "religious" threads, but I think they're just a guilty pleasure for most.

I enjoy them and I think many of the posts are remarkably insightful and literate on both sides.

I mean, can you think of a more important question than does god exist?

The great problem here is simply the morphing definition of the discussion: what do you mean by god?

Gods of a particular flavor like Zeus and Jehovah are vulnerable to hard evidence, vaguely transcendent notions of "deity" are, of course much more difficult to argue against.

Belief in deity is ubiquitous throughout the world, throughout history, so many deities, so much absolutism and no real answers only the human directive to have faith.

Perhaps the real question is if God exists why does he choose so many masks? Why does he choose to remain hidden and how could he create a world in which life is forced to feed on life in order to survive, a world filled with "natural" evil?

Watched a time lapse film of a 6 month old child dying of small pox. I challenge anybody to watch that same film and believe in a universal presence of grace in this world.

The argument that natural evil is a function of man's free will simply doesn't live up to the terrible realities of existence.



jstan

climber
Mar 15, 2010 - 02:11pm PT
Largo:
For such a young kid you really are very sneaky. People learn by using thought processes they have gone through before but in slightly new ways. So you throw spiritual states at me phrased like the particles that pop into and out of the vacuum state in QFT. Have to watch you, I think. You must be a socialist.

I understand socialists can be thrown off balance by only one thing – the truth. At least that is what republicans are telling me. Here is an attempt at truth.

Whatever spirituality is, I am looking for only one thing. The perfect moment on earth is to sit on a ledge in the sun banging your heels so the toes don’t hurt. Then to take in deep breath of cool air while listening to the leaves moving in the breeze. I don’t seek a state higher than this.

Every creature seeks something. It’s a biological imperative. What does this creature seek?

Even in the late sixties I saw that Americans were worshipping greed with such intensity they were fully prepared to destroy everything else. Now I was old so I knew I would be dead long before the americans would have their way. So it would be no problem for me personally – as long as I cared only for myself.

As long as I was content to be the lowest form of life on earth.

I'll rob a picture posted earlier on ST. This is the world as it existed when I was very young. The bar was incredibly high.
Largo

Sport climber
The Big Wide Open Face
Mar 15, 2010 - 02:42pm PT
Largo:
For such a young kid you really are very sneaky. People learn by using thought processes they have gone through before but in slightly new ways. So you throw spiritual states at me phrased like the particles that pop into and out of the vacuum state in QFT. Have to watch you, I think. You must be a socialist.


Damn, that's funny. And don't start calling me no socialist. I've been watching, for the last 11 interminable years, El Presidente Hugo Chavez systamatically tank Venezuela (where my house is and where my two daughters were born) with his hare-brained Socialismo. Somehwere a socialist balance must be attained, but I don't know where that is.

But let's go back to one thing you said: "People learn by using thought processes they have gone through before but in slightly new ways."

This is a process of evaluating and contrasting and accruing that results in a new understanding or new outcome - perhaps like making slight changes to a sequence on a boulder problem and finally climbing the thing. You have "learned" how to do it.

What I'm talking about is a kind of spontaneous knowing that is not a process or the fruit of a state - at least not so far as I can tell - but rather is aligned with being or abiding or conscious presence. Oddly, this only comes by letting go of wanting any outcome, any knowledge, any thing, including "God."

I've never been able to stabalize this at all, and only brush against it here and there. If I'm sounding vague, it's owing to my partial understanding and exerience of all this. I don't "know" what the hell I'm talking about, but am trying to but words to some very slippery and for me, transient, experiences.

JL

jstan

climber
Mar 15, 2010 - 03:04pm PT
We are getting somewhere. I think I got all of that.

Jan should chime in here eventually. I don't know enough to guess how eastern thought fits in to this.

I do some of this consciousness testing also. The first step for me is to turn the voice off. I need to get a stop watch so I can track my progress. I know that goes counter to your valid point on "no output/ no goal" but whatever works will most likely be a mixture.
Lissiehoya

climber
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 15, 2010 - 05:05pm PT
But Paul, the American Revolution and the French Revolution took drastically different paths with regards to Christianity. In terms of effects, they look nothing alike regardless of any "common" Enlightenment influence.
jstan

climber
Mar 15, 2010 - 05:13pm PT
"Since we're Americans and like our tragedies (and farces) to have a happy ending, here's a bit of good news: The return to Biblical Law (execution for adultery, drunkenness, cursing, masturbation, oral and anal sex, witchcraft, usury, etc.) would mean that virtually all the posters on ST would be killed, so we'd have no more threads like this one."

and.......and


care to break more detail out for us?

Actually we will need scores on this.


EDIT:
So I guess I can stop repeating my claim that the word christian does not mean anything?

Thanks to Kerwin I know now this is old news.
Doug Buchanan

Mountain climber
Fairbanks Alaska
Mar 15, 2010 - 06:29pm PT
I have taken the time and extensive use of calories for thinking (exhaustive questioning), to prove the existence of God beyond any question that any other human can ask.

I will upload this when I get to a place with a better connection. It is so poor where I am for a few days that I cannot upload, and I read the entire thread, out of monumental boredom.

To "believe" or "not believe" is to remain ignorant.

To ask real questions (writing them), and answer them, and ask real questions of your answers, and answer them, and so forth, until every related question of every identifiable contradiction is answered, is to advance your knowledge, and precludes any need or incentive to believe or not believe.

The human mind learns knowledge by asking and answering questions, that is, progressively identifying and resolving contradictions, that which statements do not effect, and that which intellectually lazy people do not effect.

God is not as any of the religions or churches describe. She is vastly beyond the descriptions of which the amusing little humans on Earth create their religions, churches, beliefs and other institutionally lucrative illusions.

The effort to prove the existence of God was so exhaustive it is the only process of which I have stated that I will not repeat for anyone. Would not a God obviously create such a design?

In the process to flawlessly prove the existence of God one also learns the complete functional design of the human mind, or vice versa.

All answers to all perceived contradictions become efficient upon learning the complete functional design of the human mind. An intelligent species would logically teach that knowledge to its young, as the first priority, after potty training. No human institution does so, by design. It is learned only by individuals who do it on their own. YOU can do so, by design.

To convey such knowledge to another mind requires that the conveyor ask all the related questions, and that other mind must answer them, and question their answers, and so forth, that which no intellectually lazy person, or a person too busy with their other interests and life necessities will do.


I am a common laborer by trade, which allowed the time for my mind to be asking and answering questions while sweeping floors or carrying construction materials to carpenters, etceteras, and was paid enough for food and rent, a simple life style including serious climbing.

Consider your opportunity to advance your knowledge by the only process which will do that, by design of the human mind.

Therefore.....Your paper US dollars, over-printed for the normal greed of the government dolts, lost 17 percent of their value last year, against international currencies, the source of most of your food and other materials. Dollars will lose another about 20 to 30 percent more in 2010, and worse thereafter.

The US Christian DemocanRepublicrat War and Police Regime, and its infrastructure, are about to collapse with no possible escape because there will be no useful medium of exchange for them to function, while the rural people will enjoy the food they grow. Just a trite old, routinely repeated phenomenon.

Get out of debt or abandon your current high lifestyle. Put your dollars into personally useful materials (tools), a real skill, good garden land, guns and ammo, silver or gold, if you wish.

Advance your knowledge to therefore inherently enjoy life more.

And laugh yourself to tears at the humans, the best comedy on the rock, creating the contradictions they cannot resolve because they did not learn the questioning process of resolving them at the moment of any inadvertent creation of them.

If you want clues on the nature of God, you may inquire by email, but you cannot understand God without asking and answering all the related questions, as with all knowledge.

DougBuchanan.com



Doug Buchanan

Mountain climber
Fairbanks Alaska
Mar 15, 2010 - 06:32pm PT
Wow, it uploaded.

Stand back everybody, you may be subjected to what some of my cool SuperTopo colleagues who question nothing, call "diatribes".

It is actually rabble rousing, trouble causing, arm waving and general carrying on.

The National Park Service pigs are to blame.

Doug
Port

Trad climber
San Diego
Mar 16, 2010 - 11:48am PT
While discussions of god's existence are interesting, its not really what the OP is about. Here are the changes to Texas social studies curriculum....soon coming to your children's education.

 A greater emphasis on “the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s.” This means not only increased favorable mentions of Schlafly, the founder of the antifeminist Eagle Forum, but also more discussion of the Moral Majority, the Heritage Foundation, the National Rifle Association and Newt Gingrich's Contract With America.

 A reduced scope for Latino history and culture. A proposal to expand such material in recognition of Texas’ rapidly growing Hispanic population was defeated in last week’s meetings—provoking one board member, Mary Helen Berlanga, to storm out in protest. "They can just pretend this is a white America and Hispanics don’t exist," she said of her conservative colleagues on the board. "They are rewriting history, not only of Texas but of the United States and the world."

 Changes in specific terminology. Terms that the board’s conservative majority felt were ideologically loaded are being retired. Hence, “imperialism” as a characterization of America’s modern rise to world power is giving way to “expansionism,” and “capitalism” is being dropped in economic material, in favor of the more positive expression “free market.” (The new recommendations stress the need for favorable depictions of America’s economic superiority across the board.)

 A more positive portrayal of Cold War anticommunism. Disgraced anticommunist crusader Joseph McCarthy, the Wisconsin senator censured by the Senate for his aggressive targeting of individual citizens and their civil liberties on the basis of their purported ties to the Communist Party, comes in for partial rehabilitation. The board recommends that textbooks refer to documents published since McCarthy’s death and the fall of the Soviet bloc that appear to show expansive Soviet designs to undermine the U.S. government.

 Language that qualifies the legacy of 1960s liberalism. Great Society programs such as Title IX—which provides for equal gender access to educational resources—and affirmative action, intended to remedy historic workplace discrimination against African-Americans, are said to have created adverse “unintended consequences” in the curriculum’s preferred language.

- Thomas Jefferson no longer included among writers influencing the nation’s intellectual origins. Jefferson, a deist who helped pioneer the legal theory of the separation of church and state, is not a model founder in the board’s judgment. Among the intellectual forerunners to be highlighted in Jefferson’s place: medieval Catholic philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas, Puritan theologian John Calvin and conservative British law scholar William Blackstone. Heavy emphasis is also to be placed on the founding fathers having been guided by strict Christian beliefs.

 Excision of recent third-party presidential candidates Ralph Nader (from the left) and Ross Perot (from the centrist Reform Party). Meanwhile, the recommendations include an entry listing Confederate General Stonewall Jackson as a role model for effective leadership, and a statement from Confederate President Jefferson Davis accompanying a speech by U.S. President Abraham Lincoln.

 A recommendation to include country and western music among the nation’s important cultural movements. The popular black genre of hip-hop is being dropped from the same list.

rectorsquid

climber
Lake Tahoe
Mar 16, 2010 - 12:07pm PT
Yep. The country is doomed and it's not because of atheists. That stuff above is just plain scary. I'm moving to Turkey. We seem to be going backwards here, and not just economically.

Dave

paul roehl

Boulder climber
california
Mar 16, 2010 - 12:46pm PT
"When I hear the word culture, I reach for my gun." -- Happy Hans 1939
dirtbag

climber
Mar 16, 2010 - 01:03pm PT
A recommendation to include country and western music among the nation’s important cultural movements. The popular black genre of hip-hop is being dropped from the same list.


Yaay southern white people.
Karl Baba

Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
Mar 18, 2010 - 12:00pm PT
Ghandi blew it completely.

He preached ahimsa (nonviolence) and was killed by violence.

No balance, as you need himsa (violence) also.

When the good doctor goes to repair the damaged body he creates violence against the body in order to repair it.

Lopsidedness is not intelligence.

Come on Werner! Just how would Gandhi have done better using violence? He's the most beloved person in India! Nobody thinks he blew it completely but you.

Perhaps you would prefer the Bhagavad Gita standard of brothers going to war with each other after gambling their wife away in a fixed dice game and killing everyone on both sides except for a dozen or so. Did that really turn out so great? All generally good people too.

Over a million people died in the partition of India, maybe a lot more. There was plenty of violence that nobody, including Gandhi was able to stop. A Hindu teacher of mine was taking a train from where he lived in Pakistan to India. He knew he would be a dangerous journey so he rode in the car the Muslims were in. Other Muslims stopped the train and killed all the Hindus aboard. He was the only one who made it. Just an interesting tale.

Yet it was an extremist Hindu who killed Gandhi who uttered "Ram" (God) in his last breath and you choose to cut on him here? Dude...

Peace

Karl
Lissiehoya

climber
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 18, 2010 - 10:02pm PT
@Port,

Wow, that's completely appalling, especially since the tendency of historical scholarship now is towards opening it up to minorities (in terms of race, gender, etc.) whose stories have not been told.
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Mar 18, 2010 - 10:06pm PT
I can't tell you how glad I am to have a house in a remote part of Patagonian Chile.
Largo

Sport climber
The Big Wide Open Face
Mar 18, 2010 - 11:18pm PT
"- Thomas Jefferson no longer included among writers influencing the nation’s intellectual origins."

This can only be put forth by people who have no feel for history, and are certain no one else has either - ergo, they wil not be called out for a dissing the one guy who was at the very heart of America's "intelectual origins." TJ basically wrote the Declaration of Independence, cobling it together from various enligtened parts. He also was the chief author of the "Empire of Liberty" ideal, putting the highest curency in free and independent thinking. Anyway you shake it, Jefferson was one of the Founding Fathers and for his children to say otherwise, a couple centuries later, is nothing short of a historical farce.

The word "peckerwood" sure comes to mind in reading this shite...

JL
Elcapinyoazz

Social climber
Redlands
Mar 18, 2010 - 11:23pm PT
I guess they'll have to chuck out those "Teabaggers" then, since they're always holding signs quoting Jefferson: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants".


Whatever will they do? How to choose...TeaBag Party or JesusJesusJesus.
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Mar 18, 2010 - 11:28pm PT
Ironically, Texans have a great sense of history, but only of their own. Texas has always marched to its own drummer compared to the rest of the U.S. It has lived under five different flags, including the Republic of Texas flag. It negotiated to join the Union as a sovereign country and still feel themselves to be one in many ways.

Texas was also the place in America where poor and in-trouble southerners could get a fresh start, a place where personal histories disappeared at the border and a new identity began. Needless to say, it was the Wild West for a long time and life was cheap. Then the southern religious families moved in and tried to modify it. The paradoxical result is a highly religious society, that has its own version of history, executes more prisoners than any other state and and is still the wild gun- toting (concealed weapons to be exact) West.

Love it or hate it, Texas is unique.
corniss chopper

Mountain climber
san jose, ca
Mar 18, 2010 - 11:40pm PT
Port is reading the losers side of the School text book fight.
Losers lie, especially academic ones, with half truths and innuendo.

Read the winners side and see all the slime that was cut out by
Texans who care for their kids education.

Port

Trad climber
San Diego
Mar 19, 2010 - 01:13am PT
A lie huh? I didn't write this. Its an AP piece for Yahoo News. Heres the link.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20100315/ts_ynews/ynews_ts1253

CC, there is a trend here throughout all of these changes to the curriculum that is ethnocentric, religiously centered, and diminishes the contribution of minorities to our country. I challenge you to provide your list of "slime" that was cut out so people can judge for themselves, as I have done.
Jan

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Mar 19, 2010 - 01:26am PT

CC, there is a trend here throughout all of these changes to the curriculum that is ethnocentric, religiously centered, and diminishes the contribution of minorities to our country.

What I see is a 21st century Texas reverting back to the Texas of my 1950's childhood.

What I was particularly incensed about since it involves the distortion of even their own history (which is supposedly sacred even when U.S. history is not), was the dropping of any reference to the Hispanic Tejanos who fought for the Republic.

Those defending the Alamo against Santa Ana's hordes included Anglos Davy Crocket, Jim Bowie, my g-g-g uncle who was 16 years old and died with his two best teenage friends, along with many Hispanic supporters of freedom.Every March there is a special ceremony for the descendants of the defenders of the Alamo, and the majority of those attending are Hispanic, something most people don't know and the Texans have now chosen to ignore.
Barto

climber
Minneapolis, MN
Mar 22, 2010 - 02:14pm PT
My favorite related t-shirt slogan: "English--Good enough for Jesus!"
Messages 1 - 189 of total 189 in this topic
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta