Half Dome picture from some where around Turlock

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 121 - 140 of total 189 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
aguacaliente

climber
Dec 22, 2012 - 03:54pm PT
Great picture from Mt. Hamilton, Mike. If you get another chance/clear day, and have a red filter (perhaps left over from B+W photography), try also taking long distance photos with the red filter and converting to black and white. Less effect of haze due to scattering and absorption.

I have used a very red filter with a DSLR - you need a tripod because the DSLR is not very sensitive in the red due to an internal IR-blocking filter - to take photos that are almost near-IR. The reduction in haze means the landscape can have an appearance of immense depth. It is an effect that shouldn't be overused, but great for these long distance pictures.
Mike Bolte

Trad climber
Planet Earth
Dec 22, 2012 - 03:56pm PT
Yup - I was up at Mt Hamilton for other business and was luck to have a long lens with me. If I have known what the view was going to be like I would have come better prepared with filters to push the response red and would have tried a few other tricks to increase contrast just in case.
Banquo

climber
Amerricka
Dec 22, 2012 - 05:55pm PT
Open up your camera and take out the IR filter. I've done this and it is pretty easy with some cameras - practically impossible with others. There are commercial services that do this too. Just google "ir camera conversion."

A red filter on an IR camera would make some cool images.

I converted an old, cheap, point and shoot, digital camera to infrared...
I converted an old, cheap, point and shoot, digital camera to infrared.
Credit: Banquo

Ed-
Finding an unobstructed view could be an issue. Have you thought about moving across the valley to the hills above I-5? I think Butts Road out of Gustine might work.

http://goo.gl/maps/JxhCl

The sight distance is about farther (93 miles) which will make a clear picture harder to get.
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Dec 23, 2012 - 08:07pm PT
Wednesday still has cloud cover and chance of rain...

Thur evening is clearing after that front passes... looking better


Stay tuned... UWa weather model has some good looking isobars happening sometime on Wed... so it is still in the running..
Bruce Morris

Social climber
Belmont, California
Dec 23, 2012 - 08:33pm PT
I think a lot of the critics of the size of Half Dome in this shot ignore that basic fact that the intervening atmosphere acts as a powerful lens enlarging images seen at the horizon. Hence, when you photograph a moon rise, say from Skyline Boulevard, looking east toward Mt Hamilton, the lunar disk, when it first emerges over the horizon, is much larger for a few moments before it ascends higher in the night sky. Sometimes the lunar disk on the horizon even appears at first in discontinuous wider and narrower bands. It seems like this phenomenon is stronger when the intervening atmosphere is more polluted too. Is this due to defraction of the light rays caused by the higher particle count in the atmosphere? Don't know about that, but am sure this shot is the real deal.
aguacaliente

climber
Dec 24, 2012 - 01:56am PT
Bruce, Half Dome looks large because the photographer used a very long telephoto lens and was far away from the barn. Another way of thinking about it is that standing back from the barn made the barn look "small," but standing back a half mile or whatever doesn't change the apparent size of Half Dome much, since it is already many miles away.

Atmospheric refraction is real, but it just bends light, which causes some over-the-horizon and vertical squishing effects (looks like horizontal stretching, a little). It does not magnify objects. The reason that the moon appears larger when near the horizon is an optical illusion, whose origin is not that well understood: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_illusion
luggi

Trad climber
from the backseat of Jake& Elwood Blues car
Dec 24, 2012 - 11:06am PT
John I don't know if anyone has posted did read all of them...You can catch Keyes road off highway 99 just past Ceres and just before Turlock. It is posted. You will have to travel east for a while as you make your way out of the urban areas. Years ago I used to be able to catch a glimpse of what I though was Half dome out of my back door right after a good storm. I am about 60 miles away as the crow flies.
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Dec 24, 2012 - 01:48pm PT
the combined effects of atmospheric refraction and the curvature of the Earth highlight the fact
that what we perceive may lead us to conclusions that are very different then what the
"actual" scene presents.

the angular diameters of the Moon and the Sun are roughly 0.5, which is close to the angular
diameter of your thumb held at arms length. The appearance of a "huge moon" on the horizon
can be blotted out by your thumb... (as with the sun at sunset) demonstrating that the actual
angular diameter is not changed significantly.

Atmospheric refraction will change the position of the moon with respect to the horizon, and the
horizon that you view is not the position of the local level of the ground. For instance, if you had
a laser level at the position I was at in the central valley for the shot above, it's "dot" would be
roughly 2000' above sea level in Yosemite (though still below the local surface level). However,
our perception of the Valley, part of which is the perspective we keep in our minds from
familiarity of he place, would seem to suggest that the images produced from the valley were very
different from what we would expect.

In general we do not experience the spherical Earth phenomena, and our perception does not
incorporate it in a scene which it plays an important role... so while most people on this thread
"accept" the theoretical notion that the Earth is a sphere, they would argue passionately that the
view of Half Dome doesn't correspond to their perception of that scene, and therefore the image
is false.

Shades of the inquisition of Galileo...

In some odd way, our perceptual adaptations still dominate our thinking, even though we have
knowledge contrary to those perceptions.
Banquo

climber
Amerricka
Dec 24, 2012 - 01:56pm PT
On Thursday it should be light until 5:21 and the moon rises at 3:48. Looks like a good day if the sky is clear and no fog.


U.S. Naval Observatory
Astronomical Applications Department

Sun and Moon Data for One Day

The following information is provided for Merced, Merced County, California (longitude W120.5, latitude N37.3):

Thursday
27 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time

SUN
Begin civil twilight 6:46 a.m.
Sunrise 7:15 a.m.
Sun transit 12:03 p.m.
Sunset 4:52 p.m.
End civil twilight 5:21 p.m.

MOON
Moonrise 3:48 p.m. on preceding day
Moonset 6:31 a.m.
Moonrise 4:39 p.m.
Moon transit 11:58 p.m.
Moonset 7:15 a.m. on following day



Phase of the Moon on 27 December: waxing gibbous with 100% of the Moon's visible disk illuminated.

Full Moon on 28 December 2012 at 2:21 a.m. Pacific Standard Time.







MERCED, CALIFORNIA
o , o ,
W120 29, N37 18

Altitude and Azimuth of the Moon
Dec 27, 2012
Pacific Standard Time

Time, Altitude, Azimuth


15:45, -9.8, 55.8
16:00, -7.3, 58.3
16:15, -4.9, 60.6
16:30, -2.3, 62.9
16:45, 0.7, 65.1
17:00, 3.1, 67.2
17:15, 5.7, 69.3
17:30, 8.4, 71.4
17:45, 11.1, 73.5
18:00, 13.9, 75.5
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Dec 24, 2012 - 02:56pm PT
check your times... easy to have different definitions depending on how many hours from Greenwich (right now -8)

your table is similar to mine posted above, moon rise is at 4:50pm or so
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Dec 24, 2012 - 06:23pm PT
seems like Thursday will be clear from noon on...
Wed is chance of showers and cloudy all day long...

BillO

Trad climber
Yachats, OR
Dec 24, 2012 - 08:07pm PT
Gonna have to see if I can find that valley shot on one of my drives up the 99.
Half Dome from about 30,000 feet on my way to Oregon.
Half Dome from about 30,000 feet on my way to Oregon.
Credit: BillO
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Dec 25, 2012 - 05:27pm PT
wed looks dreary, sorta like today...
thu looks less definite, with some cloud cover forecast... but the weather model shows hopeful signs as well as the forecasts
Banquo

climber
Amerricka
Dec 27, 2012 - 11:51am PT
Current satellite, 1 km VIS:
http://sat.wrh.noaa.gov/satellite/1km/

The United States Naval Observatory (USNO)sun and moon altitude azimuth calculator:
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/AltAz.php

It just might be clear enough in the valley this afternoon.
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Dec 27, 2012 - 12:35pm PT
I'll be there this afternoon/evening to shoot whatever happens...
john hansen

climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 27, 2012 - 01:27pm PT
Hope you get the shot Ed,, good lick
eKat

Trad climber
Less than a second shy of 49 minutes
Dec 27, 2012 - 01:28pm PT
This is a really neat project. . . good luck EdHartMan!

ox
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Dec 28, 2012 - 03:44am PT
thought that the atmosphere would be the problem tonight, it was the low clouds hanging on the Sierra, and obscuring the Sun set...

...got to see the Moon rise over the crest, though, but no Half Dome view...

I'm still analyzing the images to get an idea of my calculations for the next time, here are the 71 images I shot at 30 second increments. It's still a great thing to see the Moon rise on the horizon when and where you expect it too... set the camera up, and let it shot automatically.



shot with my Fujifilm S5-Pro and Nikon 180mm lens
ISO 100, 1/125 s exposures
varying apertures f11, 8, 5.6, and 4 corrected with Photoshop
timed with Nikon MC-36 15s increments alternating between "mirror up" and "expose"
Patrick Sawyer

climber
Originally California now Ireland
Dec 28, 2012 - 08:00am PT
Back in 1975, sitting in Don Reid's van in C4, he showed me a photo of Half Dome (and a bit of the Valley), taken from the top of Mt Diablo. Now the crap sandstone on Mt Diablo is where I cut my teeth climbing, and I was up there a lot from 1970-74.

I wasn't sure if the photo was real. Several years later, back up on my old stomping grounds and I went to the summit with a friend's telescope. Sure enough, there it was. It was a very clear day with no haze, fog or smog. And the top of El Cap was also visible.

They say you can also see Mt Shasta from the top of Diablo. I never have.
eKat

Trad climber
Less than a second shy of 49 minutes
Dec 28, 2012 - 09:35am PT
HEY. . . nice video and great choice in music.

:-)

MOON!

Messages 121 - 140 of total 189 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Trip Report and Articles
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews