Uncle Fanny, Church Bowl 5.7

 
Search
Go

Yosemite Valley, California USA

  • Currently 3.0/5
Sort 7 beta reports by: Most Recent | Most Helpful
What is route "beta"?
Summary of All Ratings

SuperTopo Rating:   
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 (3.0)
Average Customer Rating:   
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 (2.3)
Your Rating:     (none)
Rating Distribution
4 Total Ratings
5 star: 0%  (0)
4 star: 0%  (0)
3 star: 50%  (2)
2 star: 25%  (1)
1 star: 25%  (1)
mmurduff

Trad climber
Tustin, California
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
   Jul 6, 2005 - 07:13pm
In my opinion this climb is all of 5.7. The chimney felt harder than it looked from the ground. I would imagine that large size climbers might expeirence difficulty in this area. I didn't see any face holds outside the chimney. The upper hand crack again was harder than it looked. Gear is great but hand jams are a must. Anchors are a tree with slings and rings.

Enjoy but be ready for a challenge near the top.

MIKE
Floyd Hayes

Trad climber
Hidden Valley Lake, CA
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
   Sep 6, 2005 - 01:58pm
It's been 22 years since I top-roped this route, but I rappelled down it on Monday the 5th (after leading Church Bowl Lieback 5.8) while a bewildered climber was trying to figure out the easiest way to the top. The topo in "Yosemite Climbs" (1982) by George Myers depicts the 5.7 route as moving right about halfway up the main chimney crack to a system of smaller cracks (connected by a short face section) directly below the tree at the top. This is not illustrated in either Don Reid's "Yosemite Climbs: Free Climbs" (1994) or in SuperTopo's "Yosemite Valley Free Climbs" (2003). The more direct flaring crack illustrated in both of these guides is depicted as a 5.9 variation in "Yosemite Climbs." The bewildered climber thought both variations were very hard for 5.7 and wound up traversing right and finishing on Church Bowl Lieback 5.8. So which variation is the real 5.7, or is this climb underrated? Steve Roper's "A Climber's Guide to Yosemite Valley" (1971) rates it 5.6!
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
   Sep 19, 2005 - 05:38pm
I'm not a fan of OW's or chimneys but at 6'3" and 195 pounds or so all I can say is:

5.7 My ASS!

Ended up seconding and on prussics.... total humiliation...

-Fear
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Sep 19, 2005 - 07:37pm
 
fear
welcome to Yosemite Valley... if you think Uncle Fanny is sandbag we could probably make a pretty long list of "easy wide stuff" which is harder...
roy

Social climber
NZ -> SB,CA -> Zurich
Sep 20, 2005 - 01:59am
 

I think that both of the chimney sections are 5.7. That is, if you are of the appropriate size. 6'3" seems too large, but it's really the hip dimension that counts. Getting stuck is a significant problem.

The uppermost crack is probably 5.9 (with the 5.7 variation being a bit to the climber's right), but by then you are so glad to be out of that squeeze chimney that you will take 5.9 no matter what.

A great climb, but it seems to be a love it or hate it kind of thing.

Cheers,

Roy
Mungeclimber

Trad climber
Nothing creative to say
Mar 30, 2009 - 03:33am
 
Great starter wide crack training route.
Floyd Hayes

Trad climber
Hidden Valley Lake, CA
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
   Jun 22, 2009 - 12:52pm
After grunting through the first squeeze chimney and nearly getting stuck (I'm 5'10"; right shoulder in worked best), I stepped right onto the face and found the face/crack climbing to the right of the gully MUCH more enjoyable and well protected. If you plan to lead up through the gully without running it out, it looks like you'll need an ample arsenal of 1-2" gear, more than I had available.
Church Bowl - Uncle Fanny 5.7 - Yosemite Valley, California USA. Click to Enlarge
Church Bowl has on of the easiest approaches in the valley.
Photo: Chris McNamara
 
*What is "Route Beta"?
It's climber slang for information or tips on a route as in, "what's the beta on that route?" As a service to fellow climbers we ask SuperTopo guidebook users to post tips and updates to this website if they have relevant information to share after a climb.