Trip Report
War Path on Warbonnet, NE Face, Left
Monday March 11, 2013 2:21pm
Warbonnet at sunrise from Cirque Lake
Warbonnet at sunrise from Cirque Lake
Credit: PellucidWombat

August 23, 2012
Not all of the rock in Cirque of the Towers is good, and not all of the climbing is Type I fun.

"The route reaches the summit of Warbonnet in six fun, but loose, somewhat runout pitches."
- RPC (Radek), from SummitPost.org

"The climb requires good routefinding skills and a high level of commitment; bailing from this climb is difficult".
- Steve Bechtel, from 'A Select Guide to the Wind Rivers' Best Rock Climbing'.


The route and approaches for the NE Face of Warbonnet.


Warbonnet seen at sunrise from camp as we left for the climb.

Thomas and I had felt like we had absolutely crushed in on our first few days in the Cirque of the Towers. After knocking off the classics, we wanted a bit more 'adventure', and figured Warbonnet would be a good casual 'alpine' outing. The descriptions made it sound semi-serious with tricky routefinding, but given how fast and easily we knocked off the NE Face of Pingora the day before, we figured we could make short work of this climb and hike out the same day to try some climbs in the Tetons (ha!).

Unfortunately, the published guidebook description and line didn't match Radek's account of the climb, which led us off route. Then once we located ourselves, the exit pitch was indicated very differently between the two sources. We should have believed Radek over the guidebook! Also, the route itself was quite humbling as it was far more unnverving than expected. Ultimately we prevailed and completed a seldom-done climb that is gritty, grassy, stout, and often runout, but takes a great line up a gorgeous peak. We found this climb to be MUCH harder and it took us MUCH longer than the IV, 5.8 NE Face of Pingora that we climed 2 days prior. Don't do this one unless you lead much harder than 5.8!


Confusion

So given a choice between a published guide that you paid money for and assumed has been vetted, versus the casual recollections of a climber that he wrote down and drew up during spare time at work and distributed for free online, which one would you take? Upon casual glance, the routes appeared to be the same, but as we climbed up the face, their descriptions began to differ from each other and what we encountered. We erred on following Bechtel's guidebook, but in the end we were sorry that we had doubted Radek!



War Bonnet's NE Face seen from near Jackass Pass, and route lines laid down in retrospect . . .




Approach

Watch Tower and others under morning alpenglow.


War Bonnet under alpenglow.


NE Face of War Bonnet. Check out that slender free-standing spire on the lower left!

As the direct approach was melted out and we didn't like the idea of wet 5th class slabs that we might have to belay, we opted for the longer, cl. 3-4 route with less first-hand information. So we hiked over the climber's version of Jackass Pass, descended a hundred feet or so before picking our way over on a ledge system. Now, we had in mind that the switchback would be smaller than it was, and that the cl. 4 might be old school, so we were ready for some harder soloing. So when the ledge seemed to choke off, we started up a broken ledge system above us.

Don't do that.

I ended up in iffy 5th class terrain, and the ledges above looked less reasonable as I got higher, so we had to work out a retreat option. It just so happened that we saw a few rappel slings in the area as we backed down and added ours to the cliffside . . .


Approach ledges above Arrowhead Lake. You can mostly traverse over to this from the 'climber's Jackass Pass' trail. Look carefully for a line and some cairns as you encounter the large boulders as you descend from the pass.

We headed up the chute where the ledge appeared to end and popped out the backside on a much longer ledge system. In the end, we nearly ended up on the south side of the peak before we reached the ledge that traversed back up to the Plume, but it is casual, scenic, and probably goes much faster if you know where you're going.


Looking back at Thomas following the traverse approach. Traverse much longer than you think. The ledge appears to end, but actually narrows, drops down, then widens and continues. The switchback is obvious and if you are climbing harder than cl. 2 to exit the ledge, you are leaving it too early. I say this because at first we exited too early!


Switching back on the approach ledge. Rock was mostly solid and mostly cl. 2 with occasional cl. 3-4 crux sections. None of it was ever all that exposed or hard for the grade.


Final part of the approach ledges. The route begins at the notch ahead.

At last we reached the Plume Notch and were treated with magnificent views of the Cirque.


Shark's Nose, Overhanging Tower, Wolf's Head, Bollinger Peak, Tiger Tower (all in shadow) and Pingora seen from the notch.


Wolf's Head, Bollinger Peak, and Tiger Tower (in shadow) seen from the notch.


Shark's Nose and Overhanging Tower seen from the notch,


Pingora seen from the notch.


Attempt 1


War Bonnet NE Face first pitch and beyond, panorama.

The first pitch wanders a lot and eases up very quickly, so I mostly walked up it with a lot of drag. For those who don't want to solo mid-5th slab, I recommend simul-climbing P1 with a shortened rope.

So pitch 1 of 6 was already conquered and despite our setback on the approach, it was still early in the day. However, as the face loomed larger, points of reference disappeared and the way to go became less clear. Both Radek and Bechtel described a chimney after the first pitch. We saw 3 to choose from. The middle one seemed more chimney-like than the right one, but more in line with where we were going, so we climbed up that, expecting to traverse back right as per Radek's topo.


Finishing P1. I think Radek took the shadowy corner to the right, but the "Selects" guide directed us to the larger chimney on the left.


Thomas leading the 5.6 chimney on P2.


P2 5.6 chimney. A little dirty . . .


P2 climbing up before more traversing. We never found Radek's 6" ledge, which I think was at the next corner over (I could look down to it from here but we were cliffed out).


Starting P3 on lovely rock. It gets more decomposed higher up.


P3 crux. Thinking we were still on route, the info directed me to climb the decomposing left corner, where I couldn't see any pro or the mystical piton. No way! I like the line to the right better, and opted for what turned out to be a stout 5.8 OW (Thomas followed it as a lieback that he thought was 5.9).

Leading P3 was interesting, not just due to the lack of pro and clear path, but because this was my first time leading something so sustained in rottenness and difficulty, where I felt like I had a good chance of falling due to a smear slipping on grit or a hold breaking off. The prospect of an unexpected fall was much higher here, but with much less security with pro and safe fall zones. Most of the cracks were exfoliating seams or full of grass.


Looking down from atop P3.


Thomas at the crux. He liebacked this at what he thought was 5.9. Leading it, I crawled inside at what I would rate a 5.8 OW. It was my first time hanging on a shoulder-shoulder jam while resetting my feet.

So atop P3, it seemed like we were on route, yet not. A lot of features matched both descriptions, but not quite, and there seemed to be a few ways to go. Thomas started up a center shallow groove, expecting to find a way to traverse to the buttress on our right, where we figured P5 would start.


Thomas leading P4. He is in gritty, friable 5.8R terrain and almost at a thin grassy ledge where he traverse to the right.


Thomas leading P4. He is past the gritty, friable 5.8R terrain and on a traversing ledge. This led to a grassy, dirt 5.9 downclimb to a notch on the right. This downclimb was thin and very awkward!


Following P4. Not much for jamming or gripping. Don't slip!


Following P4. I climbed up to a small ledge and then did the crux downclimb to Thomas.


Looking back on the P4 steep grassy 5.9 downclimb (crack on the left). The correct exit pitch goes up the corner on the right that kind of blends in with the face.

So now things started to get strange. We looked more closely at both guides and saw that they were pointing at distinctly different exits. Also, we couldn't see the terrain around us well enough to pinpoint just where we were on the face. We thought we were still on route (whatever that was at this point), but we weren't too confident about that. I started up P5, which was supposed to be 5.6 and presumably a break from the scarier climbing down low. I guess it was 5.6, but something about the rock and strange body positions made it all feel spooky.


P5 (5.6 spooky).


P5 (5.6 spooky)

I gained ground fast and saw a chimney blocking the end quickly approaching. Then I came across rappel slings. I thought that would be odd to find if we were on route, and the chimney above looked large, so I wondered if it was much tougher than 5.6 and was in fact the wrong exit. I continued up a bit higher above the slings on a really tough finger crack (felt like 5.8+, but too awkward to protect, so I ran it out above the rappel horn), then had more doubts. I figured it would be easier to reverse here than going higher, so I downclimbed with a nut left as a TR piece, then rigged a rappel off the slings. Perhaps we weren't far enough over on the face?


Looking down P5. I later bailed on this pitch after a 5.8 finger traverse above some fresh rapp slings. I had doubts about being on route, which was too bad, since this was the way we should have gone!


Attempt 2

The belay for P4 also had rappel slings, and looking down the corner to our right, we saw numerous rappel stations scattered over the face. So we rappelled down into the next corner and set up a belay to climb up, assuming that we were in the 5.6 corner system that Bechtel had indicated as the finish.


So we rappelled on some bail slings at the base of P5 (there were bail slings everywhere on the face) to a ledge near some other bail slings in the next chute over. Thomas led up this corner as we thought we were one corner too far left on the face, especially after consulting the "Selects" guide photo.

Thomas stopped before going very far, and said that the corner we were in seemed to end. No way was it 5.6 if he went higher. I climbed up to him and figured maybe we were still on the left side of the face and that corner ahead was a buttress blocking our view of the rest of the face. So Thomas belayed me as I traversed sideways to the corner in hopes of better seeing where we were, or maybe finding the corner of salvation around the bend.

The end of the traverse was interesting as I had to mantle atop a car-sized detached flake that vibrated under me. I felt it safe to assume it had not been adequately tested by prior climbers, so I tried to avoid pushing out too hard on it.


I traversed this face to the sunlight. I thought the buttress on the skyline was midway across the face, and the chutes we sought after were maybe just around that corner (as there was nothing feasible in sight above us). So I traversed over on some loose ledges and large vibrating flakes to find . . .


No more NE Face! The tower in front seemed to overhang towards me. I think this is the Feather Pitch (5.9R-X). The "Selects" guide indicates the exit chute exits just to the right of the flake in sunlight behind and to the left.

So this cleared things up. Apparently we had already exhausted out options! I enjoyed the views and traversed back to Thomas.


Warrior I seen from Warbonnet.


Warrior I. Now I see why most parties don't continue to the summit after finishing the NE Face (IV, 5.9), which ends on the tower on the right. Still, the guide says it is only a 'few' pitches of '5.7 with rappels' . . .


Looking back across the NE Face. Thomas is at the base and the "Selects" guide annotated photo indicated we exit to the near side of the flake in sunshine on the ridge. Instead of 5.6 this seemed to be more like 5.10R or worse, so we decided to trust Radek's drawing again, which showed the exit being several chutes back the other way.


Looking for a 5.6-5.7 way up here. The "Selects" guide indicates 2 lines. This section was very steep (about 80 degrees) and we couldn't see anything remotely close to that level of difficulty, and no pro potential. Just seams . . .

Thomas couldn't find any way up near us that seemed remotely close to 5.6, or protectable. As we hadn't definitively exhausted that earlier corner, we decided that we should go back and make sure whether it would work or not. So we downclimbed to another rappel station where we could get back over into the prior corner we had rappelled into, so that I could climb back up the other side of it to get back on route . . .

Attempt 3

It was getting late in the day, and we were getting quite frustrated and worn out, but we weren't ready to bail just yet. We had to exhaust our options first.


Back on track looking back at Thomas. The pitch started with about 15' of unprotected 5.7 slab right off the belay. Good 'ol alpine flavor . . .


Wolf's Head from P5.

I wasn't too eager to re-lead the spooky 5.6, and it was Thomas' turn next anyways, so I stopped at the base of P5 again to swing leads. I would take the finishing chimneys to keep things fair. Thomas led up and agreed that the pitch seemed like 5.6, yet not. He didn't like it much either.


Crack climbing on the NE Face of War Bonnet.


Following P5 through the chockstone crux. Ooo lookie! A piton! That is a good sign.

Now we were sure that we were on route! The piton was a good sign (though not indicated in Radek's topo where he called out various pitons that we never found), and the chimney above looked much more doable. Scale was strange on this face, so I had assumed it was much larger than it was - instead of a huge chimney, it was a squeeze.


Reaching Thomas atop P5. A little dirty here . . . Above is the exit pitch that goes through two 5.6 squeeze chimneys. The second chimney had an interesting interior alcove with an ancient nut with chord. Stemming the alcove made the chimney easier.


P6 chimney.

I summitted and belayed Thomas up, and we enjoyed a nice alpenglow view from the top. So much for being a half-day climb!


Summit view South towards Steeple Peak (left).


Summit view of Mitchell Pk.

The descent was straightforward, although there is one tricky section where you need to cut left early where it doesn't look like you should, in order to avoid having to climb back up to the proper descent gully to the east. We made it to the bottom of the loose cl. 3-4 section just before we needed to turn on our headlamps. From there we had interminable boulder hopping on house-sized boulders to make it back to Jackass Pass and our camp. It was quite the full day! We had a casual dinner and as conditions were so nice, I slept out on the granite slab in my bag to savor the night sky.


Yet another route topo variation . . .

Post
On the hike out, Thomas and I actually crossed paths with Radek, exchanging brief greetings as our two groups passed one another. I was focused enough on getting back to the TH quickly that it took a few minutes for the neuron firing of recognition to cross the synapse :-P (we have only known each other via online communication).




Links
SummitPost Route - NE Face, Left
Picasa Album

Other Cirque of the Tower Trip Reports:
South Buttress of Pingora and East Ridge of Wolf's Head Linkup
Pingora (NE Face)
-

  Trip Report Views: 1,929
PellucidWombat
About the Author
PellucidWombat is a mountain climber from Berkeley, CA.

Comments
Did you like this Trip Report? Got something to say? Don't hold back...
Comment on this Trip Report
sharperblue

Mountain climber
San Francisco, California
  Mar 11, 2013 - 02:26pm PT
Great Report! Excellent detail, as always, and the type of report that makes me make plans - Thanks, CubicPooper!
Texplorer

Trad climber
Sacramento
  Mar 11, 2013 - 05:54pm PT
Great post. Almost feel like I was there. Looks like lots of new route possibilities out there too!
GDavis

Social climber
SOL CAL
  Mar 11, 2013 - 05:56pm PT
woah job well done :) thanks for the 'paint by numbers' topo! your work is very much appreciated!
bob

climber
  Mar 11, 2013 - 07:09pm PT
Damn you put out a good TR. (TR's!) Thanks. I love that place.
COT

climber
Door Number 3
  Mar 11, 2013 - 07:52pm PT
Nice detailed TR! Becthel posts on the forum and maybe he will include your topo in the next edition.

edited for (sp)
PellucidWombat

Mountain climber
Berkeley, CA
Author's Reply  Mar 11, 2013 - 07:59pm PT
Thanks everyone! Not a route everyone comes to the Cirque to do, but a fun adventure anyways :-)

Nice detailed TR! Betchel posts on forum and maybe he will include your tope in the next addition.

Would be nice. Or I wonder if he has anything to add about those routes or his sources for them? From a distance it looks like you could exit where indicated, but those corners fade out at the dike area that I traversed. His guidebook is all around very nice, though. Good color photos, route annotations, and area maps and it makes a nice addition to Kelsey's guide (kind of like Croft or SuperTopo to Secor).
SteveW

Trad climber
The state of confusion
  Mar 11, 2013 - 10:03pm PT

Nice job, Pellucid. Quite the adventure--great details,
photos, and flavor!
MisterE

Gym climber
Bishop, CA
  Mar 11, 2013 - 11:08pm PT
Perseverance pays off - well done!

It's not really great alpine climbing without some, though not all, of the elements mentioned above.

Nice trip, Gents! And, as usual, great blow-by-blow reporting, photos and topography!
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
  Mar 11, 2013 - 11:21pm PT
Great TR.....gotta love the Winds. I did Black Elk on Warbonnet last Summer, quality the whole way. Thanks!
justthemaid

climber
Jim Henson's Basement
  Mar 11, 2013 - 11:28pm PT
Way to stick with it. Quasi epic. I've got the world's worst route-finding skills so we'll just cross that one off the to-do list.

All that grunge really needs to be cross-posted to the choss-lovers thread BTW.
mike m

Trad climber
black hills
  Mar 11, 2013 - 11:33pm PT
Man great right up. I had a friend of mine do that, but I think he did the ridge. He said it was pretty freaky. The boulders at the base are huge and I would imagine hold hundreds of problems if not routes as some of them have to be 50plus feet of solid granite.
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
  Mar 12, 2013 - 12:01am PT
great trip report, looks like you got full value on that adventure...

the guide book I used, Kelsey's, the times I've been in the Cirque have not been the greatest on accurate detail... at some point you just have to climb...

and it seems you did, successfully!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
  Mar 12, 2013 - 12:42am PT
So great. I have been to the Cirque only twice and the second time was painfully underproductive. I have always wanted to climb that peak and you have rekindled that desire. Thanks!
Ezra Ellis

Trad climber
North wet, and Da souf
  Mar 12, 2013 - 11:07am PT
Awesome job as usual Mark, thanks.
Stellar TR!!!!
ydpl8s

Trad climber
Santa Monica, California
  Mar 12, 2013 - 11:20am PT
Your TR's are always so great to read, they really make you feel like you are there! It's amazing how a line that seems relatively easy to follow from looking at it on the approach, can seem so baffling when you are on the face. It's often a case of "can't see the forest for the trees" syndrome.

Maybe you can make a trip to RMNP and figure out where the Culp-Bossier actually goes on Hallet's, I've definitely struggled with that one:-)
le_bruce

climber
Oakland, CA
  Mar 12, 2013 - 12:52pm PT
Great stuff, Mark. What a beautiful and striking peak.
PellucidWombat

Mountain climber
Berkeley, CA
Author's Reply  Mar 12, 2013 - 02:13pm PT
I think he did the ridge. He said it was pretty freaky

Sounds like he did the Feather Pitch, which I think has been described as 'the scariest 5.9 in the universe'. From what I hear, if the runout isn't too much of a downer, the rest of that route is supposed to be great rock at 5.10 and a good route as long as you like your chimneys.

The boulders at the base are huge and I would imagine hold hundreds of problems if not routes as some of them have to be 50plus feet of solid granite.

Ugg, it was awful at night by headlamp since we couldn't pick the best route, but yeah, I see what you mean! A lot of the large boulders rise up above grassy bases too, and you're a short stroll from camp if you're doing the Black Elk route that Donini did this summer.

Maybe you can make a trip to RMNP and figure out where the Culp-Bossier actually goes on Hallet's, I've definitely struggled with that one:-)

Hahaha, I was thinking about that. That face seems so featureless (or the features are so small), looking at the annotated photos I can't tell where one route would go vs. another!
10b4me

climber
  Mar 12, 2014 - 03:56pm PT
bump
kaholatingtong

Trad climber
Nevada City
  Mar 12, 2014 - 04:21pm PT
most excellent, thank you much.
johntp

Trad climber
socal
  Mar 12, 2014 - 06:36pm PT
nothing to see here. move along. kansas is calling.
Did you like this Trip Report? Got something to say? Don't hold back...
Comment on this Trip Report
Go