Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 7261 - 7280 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
Sep 11, 2013 - 08:01pm PT
"Audited by whom?"

Unbias by any means,just in advance.

wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
Sep 11, 2013 - 08:14pm PT
Maybe,but i was not talking about him.Dude
Mad69Dog

Mountain climber
Superior, CO
Sep 11, 2013 - 08:25pm PT
"They've figured out where your man-boobs come from!"

^^^ This is where the science in this thread lives.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
Sep 11, 2013 - 08:30pm PT
I do hear you.
I realize EVERYTHING has a slant to it ,you are guilty ,so am i.
Hovering somewhere in the middle is tough to do,people take sides,balance is what that creates,hopefully.
People in the middle should be happy with that .
Kind of what we grew up with.
Spitzer

climber
Sep 11, 2013 - 08:32pm PT
Who is the balding guy in the red shirt supposed to be?
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Sep 11, 2013 - 08:33pm PT
http://www.thepiratescove.us/2013/09/11/if-all-you-see-887/
Spitzer

climber
Sep 11, 2013 - 08:38pm PT
"This is where the science in this thread lives."

Mad69Dog, aka Jeff McCoy, you should know as well as anyone that it's mostly quiet here except when the monkies are throwing their feces at one another. This thread is not about the science. It's not all about Rick Poedtke either but it is about people like him.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Sep 11, 2013 - 08:41pm PT
Spitzer, the answer to your question is here:

http://nwql.usgs.gov/news/waterlogs11-07.pdf
Mad69Dog

Mountain climber
Superior, CO
Sep 11, 2013 - 09:05pm PT
"This thread is not about the science."

Nice to see you admit that.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
Sep 11, 2013 - 09:25pm PT
OK then MD,What is this thread about?
We know you are unbiased.

Dont piss down my back ,then tell me its raining.
Chiloe

Trad climber
Lee, NH
Sep 11, 2013 - 09:34pm PT
"This thread is not about the science."
Nice to see you admit that.


Tell us about the science, maddog. You came into this thread waving claims of authority, then post vapid crap like this?
Spitzer

climber
Sep 11, 2013 - 09:35pm PT
What's to admit, Jeff? It's supposed to be about skeptics, which it turns out mostly means crackpots. I was hoping you weren't one of those but instead a credible skeptic. But so far your contributions have not been especially impressive.

And that's not to say there isn't science being discussed here. The main reason I tune in, aside from the train wreck fascination aspect which also serves to keep the thread alive, is to read the posts of Larry, Ed, and others. I miss the posts from Jeff Dozier.
Mad69Dog

Mountain climber
Superior, CO
Sep 11, 2013 - 09:54pm PT
"Tell us about the science, maddog."

Peer review is a critical component. When you squash that, there is no science. All bow down to the mighty chiloe.

"It's supposed to be about skeptics, which it turns out mostly means crackpots."

Or pedophiles, according to this thread. Squash first, consider never.

--

"They've figured out where your man-boobs come from!"

^^^ This is where the science in this thread lives.



All you authorities continue to prove me right.
Chiloe

Trad climber
Lee, NH
Sep 11, 2013 - 09:58pm PT
Peer review is a critical component. When you squash that, there is no science. All bow down to the mighty chiloe.

You post like a drunk who's just trying to pick fights. The thread has plenty of stupid already, have you got something smart? You ain't showed it so far.
Mad69Dog

Ice climber
Sep 11, 2013 - 10:03pm PT
Another cheap shot from the expert gallery.

What environmental data have you acquired recently?
wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
Sep 11, 2013 - 10:05pm PT
OH,you are RIGHT,that is for sure.
Chiloe

Trad climber
Lee, NH
Sep 11, 2013 - 10:13pm PT
Another cheap shot from the expert gallery.
What environmental data have you acquired recently?


This is really all you're here for?
Mad69Dog

Ice climber
Sep 11, 2013 - 10:30pm PT
Don't you do real research?



"that's a weird post Mad69Dog"

In the context of this thread - which has focused on Chief's tits, supposedly proven me not to be a scientist all while accusing me of being a pedophile - all by blog wisdom... And yet you think a question about real research = developing hypotheses, designing experiments, developing methods, collecting your own data and analyzing your own data is weird?

Keep fudging and forcing models dudes.
Mad69Dog

Ice climber
Sep 11, 2013 - 10:45pm PT
You are the axis of what we observe here. If you don't challenge the methods of the aggressive forum members, then you tacitly condone them.

You have no problem challenging me. And I actually collect and interpret atmospheric data, along with the rest of the research process.
Mad69Dog

Ice climber
Sep 11, 2013 - 10:57pm PT
The global heat budget is a layman's term. Surely you can google it. But when the "community" attempts to dumb it down for their dumbass layman public, they claim that FFC is responsible for global warming / climate change / impending doom. They say we need to take drastic economic measures, impose taxes, etc. surely you will not claim to know nothing of the ongoing political processes.

So, as a scientist, I ask for the believers to show me the entire mathematical process that results in the bolded conclusion above. In order to come to that conclusion, it is imperative to know the uncertainty in the contributing data. Who here has audited the data and knows the results?
Messages 7261 - 7280 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta