Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 19841 - 19860 of total 28285 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 23, 2014 - 07:58pm PT
And there you are... the entire time.



Nothing from the Concentration Camp Administrator, FUKEDWARFEDICKMENTAL on refuting the posted NASA study.


Figures.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 23, 2014 - 08:07pm PT
Um, no #1.

My first of five posts today was made at 10:44.

Your first of 18 posts today was made at 6:54. I.e., sunrise. Now, #1, I realize math is not your strong suit, but 6:54 is before 10:44, and 18 is more than 5.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 23, 2014 - 08:09pm PT
Like I said, you are there. Always. Hit number 500 something.

You're ten times easier to reel in than any farm grown Bow.


Tard!

 Jan 22, 2014
06:35am PST
Climate Change skeptics? [ot]
Sketch, you've got some work to do to supplant Chief Loud Mouth as the #1 fooking idiot. True, you lack brains, so you have that working for you, and your neo-confederate street cred earns you points, but you need to work on being a bigger loudmouth, and on being quite a bit more overbearing ... dirtbag

 Jan 18, 2014
07:11am PST
Climate Change skeptics? [ot]
So are you another of the individuals out there that dictates their entire existence SOLELY based on... "Science"? Another individual that agrees that "science" is the fundamental/unquestionable governing process of all things in the Universe? He didn't say that you loud mouthed f*#ktard. ... dirtbag

 Jan 16, 2014
06:22am PST
Climate Change skeptics? [ot]
Bookworm is too much of a coward to ever respond. He never does.... dirtbag


Your tardass is right there. Taking and eating up the hits.


ETC ETC ETC ETC


Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!




Still, nothing from the Concentration Camp Administrator, FUKEDWARFEDICKMENTAL, on refuting the posted NASA study.
http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/early-20th-century-global-warming

Regardless, I will still say them prayers for his poor Kids.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 23, 2014 - 08:23pm PT
Lol...#1 Ioves his data cherry picked.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 23, 2014 - 08:24pm PT
Tard!

 Jan 22, 2014
06:35am PST
Climate Change skeptics? [ot]
Sketch, you've got some work to do to supplant Chief Loud Mouth as the #1 fooking idiot. True, you lack brains, so you have that working for you, and your neo-confederate street cred earns you points, but you need to work on being a bigger loudmouth, and on being quite a bit more overbearing ... dirtbag

 Jan 18, 2014
07:11am PST
Climate Change skeptics? [ot]
So are you another of the individuals out there that dictates their entire existence SOLELY based on... "Science"? Another individual that agrees that "science" is the fundamental/unquestionable governing process of all things in the Universe? He didn't say that you loud mouthed f*#ktard. ... dirtbag

 Jan 16, 2014
06:22am PST
Climate Change skeptics? [ot]
Bookworm is too much of a coward to ever respond. He never does.... dirtbag


Your tardass is right there. Taking and eating up the hits.

Beyond LOL.



More like....


HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
ontheedgeandscaredtodeath

Social climber
SLO, Ca
Jan 23, 2014 - 09:55pm PT
People that actually make decisions don't care what the denier crowd thinks:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/science/earth/threat-to-bottom-line-spurs-action-on-climate.html?hp&_r=0

Misinterpret graphs all you want, the train has left the station.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 23, 2014 - 10:14pm PT
Ah, REAL Industry sure has attuned to CC, and it's longass train has indeed left the station.

This is where the worlds largest industrial complex prevails...China:


CHU CHU!




PSSSSSSSSSSSSSST, that aint steam either.


Bruce Kay

Gym climber
BC
Jan 23, 2014 - 10:38pm PT
Yo chuff, serious question - do you have any friends?
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
Jan 23, 2014 - 10:41pm PT
Yeah omg, you walked into that one.
The public, which sorta makes decisions in that we elect people who really do make decisions, seems to rank doing something about global warming about as low it can be ranked:
Climate Change: Key Data Points from Pew Research
The American public routinely ranks dealing with global warming low on its list of priorities for the president and Congress. This year, it ranked at the bottom of the 21 tested.
http://www.pewresearch.org/key-data-points/climate-change-key-data-points-from-pew-research/

Not that I necessarily agree with the public at large on that or any other issue.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 23, 2014 - 11:13pm PT
Please indicate in that paper outside of the ABSTRACT, EDH, where it states with any certainty that the C02 from 1850 to 1950, is human caused.


No where in the ABSTRACT does it refute the NASA report.

We present the greenhouse gas concentrations for the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) and their extensions beyond 2100, the Extended Concentration Pathways (ECPs). These projections include all major anthropogenic greenhouse gases and are a result of a multi-year effort to produce new scenarios for climate change research. We combine a suite of atmospheric concentration observations and emissions estimates for greenhouse gases (GHGs) through the historical period (1750–2005) with harmonized emissions projected by four different Integrated Assessment Models for 2005–2100. As concentrations are somewhat dependent on the future climate itself (due to climate feedbacks in the carbon and other gas cycles), we emulate median response characteristics of models assessed in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report using the reduced-complexity carbon cycle climate model MAGICC6. Projected ‘best-estimate’ global-mean surface temperature increases (using inter alia a climate sensitivity of 3°C) range from 1.5°C by 2100 for the lowest of the four RCPs, called both RCP3-PD and RCP2.6, to 4.5°C for the highest one, RCP8.5, relative to pre-industrial levels. Beyond 2100, we present the ECPs that are simple extensions of the RCPs, based on the assumption of either smoothly stabilizing concentrations or constant emissions: For example, the lower RCP2.6 pathway represents a strong mitigation scenario and is extended by assuming constant emissions after 2100 (including net negative CO2 emissions), leading to CO2 concentrations returning to 360 ppm by 2300. We also present the GHG concentrations for one supplementary extension, which illustrates the stringent emissions implications of attempting to go back to ECP4.5 concentration levels by 2250 after emissions during the 21st century followed the higher RCP6 scenario. Corresponding radiative forcing values are presented for the RCP and ECPs.



** No where in Table 1, Chpt 2.2 or 2.3 within the above paper, is anything mentioned regarding the period from 1850-1950 regarding human emissions or their possible part in the increase of C02 in the atmosphere. No where EDH. The verbiage of "assume" is used three times in Table 1.

(ASSUME: suppose to be the case, without proof.)


Even the C02 levels per Table 4 between 1900 - 1950 only increased a mere 15 PPM's compared to the 58 PPM increase from 1950-2000. Clearly indicating that human causation was not real discernible factor if any at all in the early 20th Century warming period of 1910-1945 that is clearly equivalent to that of 1978-1998.
**




The NASA study:

The observed global warming of the past century occurred primarily in two distinct 20 year periods, from 1925 to 1944 and from 1978 to the present. While the latter warming is often attributed to a human-induced increase of greenhouse gases, causes of the earlier warming are less clear since this period precedes the time of strongest increases in human-induced greenhouse gas (radiative) forcing. Results from a set of six integrations of a coupled ocean-atmosphere climate model suggest that the warming of the early 20th century could have resulted from a combination of human-induced radiative forcing and an unusually large realization of internal multidecadal variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system.

Several climate models accurately simulate the global warming of the late 20th century when the radiative effects of increasing levels of human-induced greenhouse gases (GHG) and sulfate aerosols are taken into account. However, the warming in the early part of the century has not been well simulated using these two climate forcings alone. Factors which could contribute to the early 20th century warming include increasing greenhouse gas concentrations, changing solar and volcanic activity, and internal variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system. The relative importance of each of these factors is not well known.
http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/early-20th-century-global-warming









Allow me to amplify BLAH's post:




http://www.pewresearch.org/key-data-points/climate-change-key-data-points-from-pew-research/


The PEOPLE don't have time for this bullshet story. They don't care. They are more concerned with "Reducing Lobbyist's" then they are your AGW ideological shetfest fear mongering political agenda.


I recommend you all go back to the original fight of "Protecting the Environment" and ditch this bullshet effort. Appears doing so will allow you all a better chance to at least get a foot into the closing door.
Braunini

Big Wall climber
cupertino
Jan 24, 2014 - 12:37am PT
I was going to get in a couple of solo laps on Astroman before yoga, but when I got to the base, Burt Bronson was roping up with some fat american.

When I asked if I could play through, he gave me the finger, so I beat him into a coma with one of my new Fires. I rescued him later. He is expected to survive.

Moral: Karma

Namaste. Stupid Americans
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Jan 24, 2014 - 12:39am PT
Amen

All hail The Chief

As Base says this thread has been dead for you AGWer's for a year. Pay the lady on the way out the door.
Wade Icey

Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
Jan 24, 2014 - 12:53am PT
Credit: Global Warning III
Braunini

Big Wall climber
cupertino
Jan 24, 2014 - 12:59am PT
That's the guy Burt Bronson was roping up with.

I let him go.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 24, 2014 - 01:52am PT
Wade Icey

Trad climber
http://www.alohashirtrescue.com

Jan 23, 2014 - 11:04am PT
Here comes the bullshet streams...

You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.
the proverbial modern day Western Extremist Socialist Sceintissceintism/socialists ideological agenda pursuing climber tribeAGW political/social ideology agenda

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans
Here comes the bullshet streams...


You and the rest of your tribe are merely a micro "Blip's and Wiggles" on the ass of this planet
May the God of this Universe be with them having to endure your pathetic mentality and totally negative attitude their entire lives.
Perfect example of your self-centered ego based thinking, ideology and agenda
.Now.. move along useless TARDBAG!

You and etal have taken those statistics and data and merely twisted/manipulated the verbiage,
incorporated your ego/self-centered titles onto them by claiming that only those/you with the knowledge to understand the science can do so intellectually (Scientism), and have used it all to perpetuate your political/social ideological fantasies (AGW fear mongering agenda) of how we humans here on earth need to start living by in order to save ourselves and the rest of the natural world.

You have established the disgusting and pathetic protocol of immediately discrediting, personally attacking and demeaning anyone that does not side with your agenda, as an important component of establishing this ideology throughout the world.having to endure the likes of your sorryass all this time

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans
Here comes the bullshet streams...

Not only does your Spouse have to put up with your total negative selfish presence, but you actually were selfish enough to bring kids into this world and then having forced them to endure you for the time you're on this planet???
Pathetic
your eco-freak humans
That bushel of sour cherries must be over loaded

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

FAIL.

Yeah, they match up alright.. if you got your head up your aSSE
Here comes the bullshet streams...
Desperate deflections and discrediting with totally distorted and non-correlating pulling outta their asses scientism information and personal attacks etc.
It is nice to see how you now relinquish that fantasy concept
and the rest of your Three Ring Circus Circle Jerk FAIL and does not go with the Political Ideology of the Buffonary AGW Tribe.
Grab them towels and wipe off your faces, again.
With that said, the/your AGW theory just got shot in the face with a proximity HE 20MM round.

BAM!

Talk about eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeggo!

I thought you were on track on how it was primarily HUMAN EMISSIONS that was causing/forcing all the warming,
You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.

The Graph is spot on.
Here comes the bullshet streams...

so we commence the deflecting/mocking whatever... nice!!!
As you pick your ass and then eat it for dinner

nice!!!

You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.

From the day your poor mother spit your sorry ass out, it has been nothing but down, down, and down......

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans
Here comes the bullshet streams...

Desperate deflections and discrediting with totally distorted and non-correlating pulling outta their asses scientism information and personal attacks etc.

Now this is seriously funny!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

FAIL.

Beyond hilarious now
Simply satisfying to see what supposed "professional" PhD's and Scientists truly behave like when their ideological agenda starts failing, big time

STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPID human scientists are trying to take ALL the credit for humans causing all the warming

You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.

Same bullshet
You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.
Left Wing Extremist Socialist story telling, photoshopping and propagandist tactics.

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

FAIL.

Here comes the bullshet streams...

Next, please!




Sketch

Trad climber
H-ville
Jan 24, 2014 - 08:38am PT
People that actually make decisions don't care what the denier crowd thinks:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/science/earth/threat-to-bottom-line-spurs-action-on-climate.html?hp&_r=0

Misinterpret graphs all you want, the train has left the station.

You should pay better attention. EU countries are reneging on their Kyoto protocol commitments. China, India and Russia have been steadily increasing their CO2 output since the Kyoto protocol came into existence. Globally, 1200 coal-fired power plants are in the planning stages.

Global investment in renewable energy fell in 2012, and fell again in 2013.

Left the station?

Sure thing.
Bruce Kay

Gym climber
BC
Jan 24, 2014 - 10:53am PT
If you are really interested in protecting your assets you may want to get out of the southwest now and consider a move to the north west. No not oregon and washington, their going to be fuked as well. I mean the BC northwest and even that crack haven Wassila. liquidate now while it still has some value and get in up north before land values really go apeshit when all controls are stripped from oil, gas and mining.

If your going to be cockroach, at least don't be a stupid one chuff.
Malemute

Ice climber
great white north
Jan 24, 2014 - 11:06am PT
Lloyds of London Arctic Risk Report
Bruce Kay

Gym climber
BC
Jan 24, 2014 - 11:17am PT
If all players spend a small amount to mitigate the pollution, there is an advantage to each player which is larger than what it spent. However, it requires the cooperation of all players.

If you happen to be a Tea Party libertarian ( half dead but fuming mad white guy) then this is the primary motivation of opposition with Chuff, Rick and co. Never mind that they live in trailers in a desert, its the principle that counts. The principle, "Chuffian Darwinism" is survival of the fittest even if that does not include you. Cooperation equals capitulation, just like humility equals humiliation.

Sketch

Trad climber
H-ville
Jan 24, 2014 - 11:34am PT
However, it requires the cooperation of all players.

The crux of the issue.
Messages 19841 - 19860 of total 28285 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews