Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 19821 - 19840 of total 28306 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
dirtbag

climber
Jan 23, 2014 - 01:44pm PT
Like I said yesterday, it's a sun up to sundown effort for #1.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 23, 2014 - 01:51pm PT
There's hit #1 for the day!!! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


No need to add anything else.

DMT

Gotta love it... the contempt part that is.

moosedrool

climber
Stair climber, lost, far away from Poland
Jan 23, 2014 - 01:53pm PT
It is good to see nobody got converted.

;)
dirtbag

climber
Jan 23, 2014 - 01:57pm PT
Boo hoo hoo #1.
TLP

climber
Jan 23, 2014 - 01:59pm PT
Weren't your motorcycle (sweet ride!) and the fuel you put in it directly derived from exactly that Scientism you are criticizing? Unless you are collecting rainwater, a pretty poor approach in the West just now, doesn't your water supply come out of some scientifically designed system? You can't have it both ways. The vast majority of people who do sciences do not in the remotest way believe human beings control everything. Though the species has done a lot of habitat modification, one way or another.

Realistically, I don't think there will be any major collective action about CO2, and whether there even should be is a totally fair question. Absent China buying into the effort in a huge way, my personal answer is No. But either way, it is really useful to do the science that will enable us to have some idea of the timeline of sea level rise, for example, and plan for it. Any kind of useful sea defenses are expensive and take a long time to build. Or changes in precipitation patterns that affect major water systems. It's sensible to try to figure this out and adapt to the reality. Plus, if it turns out that the western U.S. gets one of those mega droughts that you correctly point out have occurred regularly in the centuries prior to the 20th, we'd be better prepared for that too. Maybe we'd even have figured out enough about the natural oscillations that we'd know roughly when one of those was going to come down the road.
Wade Icey

Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
Jan 23, 2014 - 02:04pm PT
Up De Nile Summer Iced


Here comes the bullshet streams...

You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.
the proverbial modern day Western Extremist Socialist Sceintissceintism/socialists ideological agenda pursuing climber tribeAGW political/social ideology agenda

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans
Here comes the bullshet streams...


You and the rest of your tribe are merely a micro "Blip's and Wiggles" on the ass of this planet
May the God of this Universe be with them having to endure your pathetic mentality and totally negative attitude their entire lives.
Perfect example of your self-centered ego based thinking, ideology and agenda
.Now.. move along useless TARDBAG!

You and etal have taken those statistics and data and merely twisted/manipulated the verbiage,
incorporated your ego/self-centered titles onto them by claiming that only those/you with the knowledge to understand the science can do so intellectually (Scientism), and have used it all to perpetuate your political/social ideological fantasies (AGW fear mongering agenda) of how we humans here on earth need to start living by in order to save ourselves and the rest of the natural world.

You have established the disgusting and pathetic protocol of immediately discrediting, personally attacking and demeaning anyone that does not side with your agenda, as an important component of establishing this ideology throughout the world.having to endure the likes of your sorryass all this time

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans
Here comes the bullshet streams...

Not only does your Spouse have to put up with your total negative selfish presence, but you actually were selfish enough to bring kids into this world and then having forced them to endure you for the time you're on this planet???
Pathetic
your eco-freak humans
That bushel of sour cherries must be over loaded

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

FAIL.

Yeah, they match up alright.. if you got your head up your aSSE
Here comes the bullshet streams...
Desperate deflections and discrediting with totally distorted and non-correlating pulling outta their asses scientism information and personal attacks etc.
It is nice to see how you now relinquish that fantasy concept
and the rest of your Three Ring Circus Circle Jerk FAIL and does not go with the Political Ideology of the Buffonary AGW Tribe.
Grab them towels and wipe off your faces, again.
With that said, the/your AGW theory just got shot in the face with a proximity HE 20MM round.

BAM!

Talk about eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeggo!

I thought you were on track on how it was primarily HUMAN EMISSIONS that was causing/forcing all the warming,
You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.

The Graph is spot on.
Here comes the bullshet streams...

so we commence the deflecting/mocking whatever... nice!!!
As you pick your ass and then eat it for dinner

nice!!!

You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.

From the day your poor mother spit your sorry ass out, it has been nothing but down, down, and down......

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans
Here comes the bullshet streams...

Desperate deflections and discrediting with totally distorted and non-correlating pulling outta their asses scientism information and personal attacks etc.

Now this is seriously funny!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

FAIL.

Beyond hilarious now
Simply satisfying to see what supposed "professional" PhD's and Scientists truly behave like when their ideological agenda starts failing, big time

STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPID human scientists are trying to take ALL the credit for humans causing all the warming

You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.

Same bullshet
You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.
Left Wing Extremist Socialist story telling, photoshopping and propagandist tactics.

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

FAIL.

Here comes the bullshet streams...

Next, please!



Sketch

Trad climber
H-ville
Jan 23, 2014 - 02:18pm PT
Here comes the bullshet streams...

You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.
the proverbial modern day Western Extremist Socialist Sceintissceintism/socialists ideological agenda pursuing climber tribeAGW political/social ideology agenda

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans
Here comes the bullshet streams...


You and the rest of your tribe are merely a micro "Blip's and Wiggles" on the ass of this planet
May the God of this Universe be with them having to endure your pathetic mentality and totally negative attitude their entire lives.
Perfect example of your self-centered ego based thinking, ideology and agenda
.Now.. move along useless TARDBAG!

You and etal have taken those statistics and data and merely twisted/manipulated the verbiage,
incorporated your ego/self-centered titles onto them by claiming that only those/you with the knowledge to understand the science can do so intellectually (Scientism), and have used it all to perpetuate your political/social ideological fantasies (AGW fear mongering agenda) of how we humans here on earth need to start living by in order to save ourselves and the rest of the natural world.

You have established the disgusting and pathetic protocol of immediately discrediting, personally attacking and demeaning anyone that does not side with your agenda, as an important component of establishing this ideology throughout the world.having to endure the likes of your sorryass all this time

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans
Here comes the bullshet streams...

Not only does your Spouse have to put up with your total negative selfish presence, but you actually were selfish enough to bring kids into this world and then having forced them to endure you for the time you're on this planet???
Pathetic
your eco-freak humans
That bushel of sour cherries must be over loaded

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

FAIL.

Yeah, they match up alright.. if you got your head up your aSSE
Here comes the bullshet streams...
Desperate deflections and discrediting with totally distorted and non-correlating pulling outta their asses scientism information and personal attacks etc.
It is nice to see how you now relinquish that fantasy concept
and the rest of your Three Ring Circus Circle Jerk FAIL and does not go with the Political Ideology of the Buffonary AGW Tribe.
Grab them towels and wipe off your faces, again.
With that said, the/your AGW theory just got shot in the face with a proximity HE 20MM round.

BAM!

Talk about eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeggo!

I thought you were on track on how it was primarily HUMAN EMISSIONS that was causing/forcing all the warming,
You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.

The Graph is spot on.
Here comes the bullshet streams...

so we commence the deflecting/mocking whatever... nice!!!
As you pick your ass and then eat it for dinner

nice!!!

You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.

From the day your poor mother spit your sorry ass out, it has been nothing but down, down, and down......

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans
Here comes the bullshet streams...

Desperate deflections and discrediting with totally distorted and non-correlating pulling outta their asses scientism information and personal attacks etc.

Now this is seriously funny!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

FAIL.

Beyond hilarious now
Simply satisfying to see what supposed "professional" PhD's and Scientists truly behave like when their ideological agenda starts failing, big time

STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPID human scientists are trying to take ALL the credit for humans causing all the warming

You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.

Same bullshet
You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.
Left Wing Extremist Socialist story telling, photoshopping and propagandist tactics.

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

FAIL.

Here comes the bullshet streams...

Next, please!

Nice rant, Wade.

Who knew???
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
Jan 23, 2014 - 02:31pm PT
In another direction, I think blahblah's question about a non-trivial prediction is a reasonable one, though the answer is not simple for two reasons: it needs to incorporate controls relating to unpredictable or semi-predictable but irregular natural processes (volcanic eruptions, ocean oscillations) . . . And as his graphic shows, the observed temperatures certainly fall within the range of the collective modeling effort. Probably needs to be expanded to accommodate increasing understanding of ocean heat content. But something along those lines would be useful. Basically, scientists do this general kind of evaluation all the time with modeling, and when something doesn't fit, start looking at all the inputs and calculations to see what might be wrong. I don't do climate, but I do vegetation modeling sometimes, and that's exactly what we do.

Good point about volcanoes in particular for short term predictions--that alone may make relatively short term predictions impossible I suppose.
But the reason I'm looking for "future" predictions instead of "past" predictions is to keep them from cheating by just tweaking the models to fit with whatever the temperatures happened to be through numerical fudging (that's what I see as the problem with the statistics based approach, which I thought Ed was against, but now I guess he's for).

Here is an analogy: as I understand it, it is entirely possible to create a statistics "model" that accurately links any particular data sets together, such as temperatures, Broncos win-loss record, and the good ol' price of tea in China. Of course there is zero predictive power in such "models."
That's basically why we need to look at future predictions rather than past predictions (yeah it seems ridiculous to have to specify that predictions must be about the "future," but that's not my fault--the modelers are the ones who make "models" that seem to correspond to past data and then brag about how great they are!).

The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 23, 2014 - 02:45pm PT
Wade Icey

Trad climber
http://www.alohashirtrescue.com

Jan 23, 2014 - 11:04am PT
Here comes the bullshet streams...

You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.
the proverbial modern day Western Extremist Socialist Sceintissceintism/socialists ideological agenda pursuing climber tribeAGW political/social ideology agenda

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans
Here comes the bullshet streams...


You and the rest of your tribe are merely a micro "Blip's and Wiggles" on the ass of this planet
May the God of this Universe be with them having to endure your pathetic mentality and totally negative attitude their entire lives.
Perfect example of your self-centered ego based thinking, ideology and agenda
.Now.. move along useless TARDBAG!

You and etal have taken those statistics and data and merely twisted/manipulated the verbiage,
incorporated your ego/self-centered titles onto them by claiming that only those/you with the knowledge to understand the science can do so intellectually (Scientism), and have used it all to perpetuate your political/social ideological fantasies (AGW fear mongering agenda) of how we humans here on earth need to start living by in order to save ourselves and the rest of the natural world.

You have established the disgusting and pathetic protocol of immediately discrediting, personally attacking and demeaning anyone that does not side with your agenda, as an important component of establishing this ideology throughout the world.having to endure the likes of your sorryass all this time

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans
Here comes the bullshet streams...

Not only does your Spouse have to put up with your total negative selfish presence, but you actually were selfish enough to bring kids into this world and then having forced them to endure you for the time you're on this planet???
Pathetic
your eco-freak humans
That bushel of sour cherries must be over loaded

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

FAIL.

Yeah, they match up alright.. if you got your head up your aSSE
Here comes the bullshet streams...
Desperate deflections and discrediting with totally distorted and non-correlating pulling outta their asses scientism information and personal attacks etc.
It is nice to see how you now relinquish that fantasy concept
and the rest of your Three Ring Circus Circle Jerk FAIL and does not go with the Political Ideology of the Buffonary AGW Tribe.
Grab them towels and wipe off your faces, again.
With that said, the/your AGW theory just got shot in the face with a proximity HE 20MM round.

BAM!

Talk about eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeggo!

I thought you were on track on how it was primarily HUMAN EMISSIONS that was causing/forcing all the warming,
You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.

The Graph is spot on.
Here comes the bullshet streams...

so we commence the deflecting/mocking whatever... nice!!!
As you pick your ass and then eat it for dinner

nice!!!

You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.

From the day your poor mother spit your sorry ass out, it has been nothing but down, down, and down......

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans
Here comes the bullshet streams...

Desperate deflections and discrediting with totally distorted and non-correlating pulling outta their asses scientism information and personal attacks etc.

Now this is seriously funny!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

FAIL.

Beyond hilarious now
Simply satisfying to see what supposed "professional" PhD's and Scientists truly behave like when their ideological agenda starts failing, big time

STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPID human scientists are trying to take ALL the credit for humans causing all the warming

You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.

Same bullshet
You guys are really getting funny.
Beyond hilarious now.
Left Wing Extremist Socialist story telling, photoshopping and propagandist tactics.

Hey dipshet egocentric humans
you egocentric scientism humanoids
you and your extreme left-wing socialist liberal eco-freak scientism political zealots
your eco-freak humans

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

FAIL.

Here comes the bullshet streams...

Next, please!




BASE104

Social climber
An Oil Field
Jan 23, 2014 - 02:57pm PT
Western Extremist Socialist Sceintism manner of thinking that states man can be and is in control of everything.

This kind of infantile, politically biased propaganda, is the main reason that this thread serves no further purpose. It died a natural death a year ago, and now we are wondering what that awful smell is.

The quote above has nothing to do with the science. Nothing. It just shows that The Chief has this gut feeling about climate change brought on by his political ideals.

Give it up, everyone. Show is over. Pay the lady at the front desk on the way out.
TLP

climber
Jan 23, 2014 - 03:20pm PT
Blahblah, yes "prediction" has to be future: that's what the "pre" part is all about. So I'm with you there, seems totally reasonable to ask about forecasting ability, but just accept that the statement of a forecast is not going to be simple, and if it is, I'd bet plenty that it would either be a trivial statement or be wrong. We have tons of data showing that whatever climate parameter you measure varies a lot year to year, decade to decade, and century to century. Just defining the scale of a prediction is not that easy.

Taking your analogy a bit further (tea and temperature and the Broncos), if you constructed such a model, the data sets might quickly show that there's a correlation between the temperature and tea price, but that the Broncos record didn't. The forecasting ability of the tea and temperature model would be good; and the three-parameter one would be poor. So the appropriate next step would be to toss the Broncs out of your plan to buy tea futures. That's essentially the point of the climate modeling conclusion that CO2 is a significant effect for the period after about 1950 or 1970 (I forget which), only in reverse. When you run the mathematical models with CO2 "turned off", the bunch of natural oscillations that are still in there do a poor job of matching observed temperatures and can reasonably be expected to remain poor for predictions too. When you turn CO2 back on, the match is better and can be expected to make a better prediction. Even with the more or less flat global temperatures of the last 10+ years, the wiggly temperature line is still pretty close to the "prediction" line. There are LOTS of such flat or downward wiggles in the historical record that are even longer than the current one, way too early to say this short period invalidates the modeling structure. Still, predictive ability is a fair subject for discussion.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 23, 2014 - 03:42pm PT
The Chief has this gut feeling about climate change brought on by his political ideals.

Ah, nope.


Let's get specific here. Climate Change , which I agree is in fact an occurring "Natural" event and has been doing so for 4.6 billion years, and, AGW, are two completely different entities.

CC has absolutely nothing to do with "political views".

The ideology and political push behind AGW, does. Political ideals that is.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 23, 2014 - 04:44pm PT
That said, there is universal agreement that the CO₂ concentrations due to human activity are affecting the global climate. The models are accurate forecasts tools.

Bullshet EDH!

Please cite a ref or paper the definitively states that C02 due to human activity is the mechanism of forcing for the steady temp rise during the early part of the 20th Century up to and through the early 1950's.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 23, 2014 - 04:45pm PT
Like you would read them...
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 23, 2014 - 04:59pm PT
Like MONO already posted a study conducted by NASA for the early 20th Century that states nothing about any human activity.

NONE!!


The observed global warming of the past century occurred primarily in two distinct 20 year periods, from 1925 to 1944 and from 1978 to the present. While the latter warming is often attributed to a human-induced increase of greenhouse gases, causes of the earlier warming are less clear since this period precedes the time of strongest increases in human-induced greenhouse gas (radiative) forcing. Results from a set of six integrations of a coupled ocean-atmosphere climate model suggest that the warming of the early 20th century could have resulted from a combination of human-induced radiative forcing and an unusually large realization of internal multidecadal variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system.

Several climate models accurately simulate the global warming of the late 20th century when the radiative effects of increasing levels of human-induced greenhouse gases (GHG) and sulfate aerosols are taken into account. However, the warming in the early part of the century has not been well simulated using these two climate forcings alone. Factors which could contribute to the early 20th century warming include increasing greenhouse gas concentrations, changing solar and volcanic activity, and internal variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system. The relative importance of each of these factors is not well known.
http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/early-20th-century-global-warming
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Jan 23, 2014 - 05:03pm PT
Like MONO already posted a study conducted for the early 20th Century that states nothing about any human activity.

NONE!!

The Chief shows off his very poor reading comprehension again.

http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/early-20th-century-global-warming
http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/early-20th-century-global-warming
Credit: monolith
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Jan 23, 2014 - 05:40pm PT
Ed's above post is as self refuting as careful comparison of of AR5's SPM and WG1. Take the following examples for instance;

"The models aren't tweaked" vs "additional fundamental additions are made"-both descriptions in regards to model adjustments.

"The models are accurate forecast tools" vs "The observations select the correct models"- in regard to adherence with reality.

Now, let's compare the reality of observations compared to the reality of the models from an independent source, the great Dr. Roy Spencer. Click link below.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2013/06/still-epic-fail-73-climate-models-vs-measurements-running-5-year-means/



The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 23, 2014 - 07:23pm PT
Wrong AGAIN FUKEDWARFEDICKBREATHMENTAL!

The studies and MODELS are not clear at all and so very INCONCLUSIVE. Thus ALL the modeling prior to the last warming from 1978-1998 is moot. Not valid nor accurate.


The observed global warming of the past century occurred primarily in two distinct 20 year periods, from 1925 to 1944 and from 1978 to the present. While the latter warming is often attributed to a human-induced increase of greenhouse gases, causes of the earlier warming are less clear since this period precedes the time of strongest increases in human-induced greenhouse gas (radiative) forcing. Results from a set of six integrations of a coupled ocean-atmosphere climate model suggest that the warming of the early 20th century could have resulted from a combination of human-induced radiative forcing and an unusually large realization of internal multidecadal variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system.

Several climate models accurately simulate the global warming of the late 20th century when the radiative effects of increasing levels of human-induced greenhouse gases (GHG) and sulfate aerosols are taken into account. However, the warming in the early part of the century has not been well simulated using these two climate forcings alone. Factors which could contribute to the early 20th century warming include increasing greenhouse gas concentrations, changing solar and volcanic activity, and internal variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system. The relative importance of each of these factors is not well known.
http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/early-20th-century-global-warming


I will say a lengthy prayer for your "KIDS" again tonight FUKEDWARFDICKBREATHMENTAL.

They definitely need all the help they can get.

Must be worse than a Nazi concentration camp in your residence.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Jan 23, 2014 - 07:50pm PT
Post ANYTHING that will refute it FUKEDWARFEDICKBREATHMENTAL.

Go ahead.... refute it.









HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA. HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

You cant.




Read and weap out loud you pathetic turd eater.


The observed global warming of the past century occurred primarily in two distinct 20 year periods, from 1925 to 1944 and from 1978 to the present. While the latter warming is often attributed to a human-induced increase of greenhouse gases, causes of the earlier warming are less clear since this period precedes the time of strongest increases in human-induced greenhouse gas (radiative) forcing. Results from a set of six integrations of a coupled ocean-atmosphere climate model suggest that the warming of the early 20th century could have resulted from a combination of human-induced radiative forcing and an unusually large realization of internal multidecadal variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system.

Several climate models accurately simulate the global warming of the late 20th century when the radiative effects of increasing levels of human-induced greenhouse gases (GHG) and sulfate aerosols are taken into account. However, the warming in the early part of the century has not been well simulated using these two climate forcings alone. Factors which could contribute to the early 20th century warming include increasing greenhouse gas concentrations, changing solar and volcanic activity, and internal variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system. The relative importance of each of these factors is not well known.
http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/early-20th-century-global-warming



Oh yeah you SHETFESTFUKMENTAL, you forgot to include this tid bit fact of reality in your diarrheashetspray regurgitation above. NO WARMING FOR 16 YEARS STRAIGHT!:












Don't worry FUKEDWARFEDICKMENTAL, I will still pray for your poor KIDS! Your SPOUSE most assuredly canned your ass years ago.
That is of course if you do not actually have her permanently chained to the basement.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 23, 2014 - 07:55pm PT
Sunup to sundown...
Messages 19821 - 19840 of total 28306 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews