Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 18981 - 19000 of total 20087 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
new world order2

climber
Jan 30, 2015 - 09:35am PT
Tonnes of (mainstream media) links to climate geo-engineering.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-30197085
Ideas include aircraft spraying out sulphur particles at high altitude to mimic the cooling effect of volcanoes.

http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/what-is-geoengineering/what-is-geoengineering/?
Stratospheric aerosols. Introducing small, reflective particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect some sunlight before it reaches the surface of the Earth.

http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/372/2031#introduction

Climate engineering: exploring nuances and consequences of deliberatel...
Climate engineering: exploring nuances and consequences of deliberately altering the Earth's energy budget.
Credit: new world order2
Credit: new world order2
Credit: new world order2


new world order2

climber
Jan 30, 2015 - 09:38am PT

It's already here NWO. You don't need anything implanted if you have an Android phone or tablet.

Indeed Chief, it is. But one can actually get the chip beneath their skin now.....

Office Implants Microchips Under Employees' Skin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-ts=1422579428&x-yt-cl=85114404&v=aDzabqO8g1E
Chewybacca

Trad climber
Montana, Whitefish
Jan 30, 2015 - 09:44am PT
Geo-engineering is what happens when you pump billions of tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year. Ignorance is denying that these greenhouse gases are a form of geoengineering.
Chiloe

Trad climber
Lee, NH
Jan 30, 2015 - 11:43am PT
We've been spraying chemicals into the air, in large quantities, for 150 years. Currently, what, 20-30 billion tons of CO2 a year.

Upwards of 30 gigatons per year, and unlike these fantasies that geoengineering is really happening, right now. Along with so much other unintentional geoengineering from deforestation, soil erosion, or using ocean ecosystems as the ultimate sink. We're definitely changing the planet, heading in directions we won't like. Biologists have noted that "human-dominated ecosystems" are so ubiquitous now, it's hard to find the other kind.

As for the proposed geoengineering "solutions" to greenhouse warming, they look like bad ideas to me for many reasons, including (1) likely to bite back, perhaps drastically; (2) don't solve but excuse delayed action on the real problems; and (3) even if they worked perfectly as planned (which I doubt) it would be like taking heroin to cure your headache. If some geoengineering fix magically kept the atmosphere from frying our crops, we couldn't stop or pause ever.
crunch

Social climber
CO
Jan 30, 2015 - 11:46am PT
Ah, you mean like the 100's of scientist throughout the globe that Monsanto hires annually

No, I don't mean scientists working for corporations like Monsanto.

I mean scientists paid by universities and government laboratories, because they have independence and can go wherever their research takes them. They can publish whatever they find.

You do understand the difference?
crunch

Social climber
CO
Jan 30, 2015 - 11:56am PT
Only those scientist that do the research and work that you and the others here agree with are true scientist. Right?

No. That's not what I said.
Roger Brown

climber
Oceano, California
Jan 30, 2015 - 12:03pm PT
Crunch,
:-)
dirtbag

climber
Jan 30, 2015 - 02:18pm PT
Zzzzzz....
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Jan 30, 2015 - 04:26pm PT
you are happy to use the modern conveniences offered by our technologies,

yes or no?

science provides the knowledge to produce the technologies... if you don't like it "just don't clip the bolt"

as far as genetic modification, did it ever occur to you that is exactly what happened in the domestication of various species: cows, sheep, corn, wheat, etc... only thousands of years ago? they are all genetically modified, selected to be of use to humans, by humans...

oh the horror!
new world order2

climber
Jan 30, 2015 - 05:42pm PT
oh the horror!

Yes Ed, the "various species" you speak of were genetically modified, but by natural/non-scientific methods.

What Franken-Monsanto is creating, is a whole other corn on the cob.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/10/16/gm-study-reveals-health-damage-and-cover-up.aspx

A German court ordered Monsanto to make public a controversial 90-day rat study on June 20, 2005. The data upheld claims by prominent scientists that animals fed genetically modified (GM) corn developed extensive health effects in the blood, kidneys, and liver ... and that humans eating the corn might also be at risk.

Rats fed Mon 863 developed several reactions:

Increased basophils typically found with allergies

Increased lymphocytes and white blood cells, which is a common response to infections, toxins, and various diseases including cancer

Decreased reticulocyte (immature red blood cell) count as found in anemia

Decreased kidney weight, which often relates to blood pressure problems

Increased blood sugar levels

Kidney inflammation

Liver and kidney lesions

Do you like Froot Loops, Ed?

ndependent DNA lab testing has verified that 100% of the corn in Kellogg’s Froot Loops is genetically modified corn, containing DNA sequences known to be present in insecticide producing Bt and Roundup Ready corn.

Read more: http://naturalsociety.com/gmos-monsantos-roundup-found-kelloggs-froot-loops/#ixzz3QMK0R52Z
Follow us: @naturalsociety on Twitter | NaturalSociety on Facebook


rottingjohnny

Sport climber
mammoth lakes ca
Jan 30, 2015 - 05:50pm PT
The Chief...You have a thing for sheep...Is it the Basque heritage..?
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Jan 30, 2015 - 05:53pm PT
Do you actually ingest them foods ED H?

I just enjoyed a nice beer which used yeasts, malts and barleys that were all scientifically manipulated (perhaps not by molecular biology, but scientific none the less)...

...so yes, in fact, we all ingest genetically modified foods.

You don't have too if you don't want to... I don't eat Fruit Loops, that's a personal choice.


WBraun

climber
Jan 30, 2015 - 05:55pm PT
Most scientists, like all of us, try to do what's right.


Are you sure you know what's right.

Rotting Johny sure doesn't ......
new world order2

climber
Jan 30, 2015 - 06:07pm PT
perhaps not by molecular biology

Therein lies the stickler. Unlike Monsanto.

There is no fruit in Froot Loops, Ed. I can see why you don't eat it. I don't either.
But there sure is a heck of a lot of GMO corn! Lol.

rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Jan 30, 2015 - 06:55pm PT
Ed's right. We've been modifying crops, livestock, and geoengineering our environment for ten thousand years. I don't understand the current paranoia about modified crops anymore than I understand the paranoia about climate.

Ooh. Fruitloops, I loved those as a kid.
moosedrool

climber
Andrzej Citkowicz far away from Poland
Jan 30, 2015 - 11:30pm PT
"Poll sheds light on Republicans’ changing global warming views.

Nearly half of Republicans said they were more likely to support a political candidate who believes in human-caused global warming and who advocates action to stop its effects on the environment, a new poll released by Stanford University, The New York Times and environmental nonprofit Resources for the Future shows.

Asked if they would be more or less likely to vote for a candidate who believed “global warming has been happening for the past 100 years,” primarily because of humans’ “burning fuels and putting out greenhouse gases,” some 48 percent of Republican respondents said they would be more likely to vote for such a candidate, compared with 24 percent who said they would be less likely to do so; 26 percent said it would have no effect."

http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/1/30/poll-sheds-light-on-gop-global-warming-views.html

Moosenews
Dingus Milktoast

Gym climber
Maestro, Ecosystem Ministry, Fatcrackistan
Jan 31, 2015 - 05:52am PT
The "underlying utopian agenda" will never be achieved.

This is the underlying strawman agenda.

DMT
Dingus Milktoast

Gym climber
Maestro, Ecosystem Ministry, Fatcrackistan
Jan 31, 2015 - 07:28am PT
Hey Moose, if this is true, then why did 100% of Repubs in America vote in people to the Congress and Senate just over two months ago that 72% of or greater ARE NOT in tune with the CAGW agenda and will do all they can to reverse many of the latest EPA/POTUS's mandates and regulations regarding Coal Fired Plants etc. Which btw now own both the House and the Senate.

They're tribal.

DMT
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Jan 31, 2015 - 08:09am PT
Right DMT. And endangered Polar Bears, blaming all adverse weather events on agw, the precautionary principle, "even if the science is wrong its still the right thing to do for the planet", and on and on and on aren't?
Malemute

Ice climber
great white north
Jan 31, 2015 - 08:14am PT
Over the past 50 years throughout most of B.C. and Alberta, the average nightly low temperature in the middle of winter has increased at least 2 C near the coast and up to 5 C in parts of the Rockies, according to University of Saskatchewan hydrologist John Pomeroy. Dr. Pomeroy, a Canada Research Chair in Water Resources and Climate Change, said climate change has shortened the spring ski season anywhere from four to six weeks at many hills.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/how-bcs-ski-resorts-are-coping-with-global-warming/article22731538/

♦ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ♦
    Climate Change Deniers are Liars - Google
♦ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ♦
Messages 18981 - 19000 of total 20087 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews