Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 16101 - 16120 of total 29629 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Sketch

Trad climber
Langley, VA
Nov 22, 2013 - 11:42am PT
Maybe you should keep your fantasies to yourself.
Ron Anderson

Trad climber
Relic MilkEye and grandpoobah of HBRKRNH
Nov 22, 2013 - 11:47am PT
sooooo has the oceans risen to above Rileys lip line in Texas yet?


Has that .06 of ONE degree we are talking about caused any catastrophes yet?


Soooo if it has taken 20 billion in studies over .06 of ONE DEGREE and yet this all continues. We here have been talking about that .06 of ONE DEGREE for well over a year. And that .06 hasnt changed.!!!!!!!!!!


We have SOLVED AGW!!!
raymond phule

climber
Nov 22, 2013 - 12:01pm PT

Global seaice area is the same size as it was 34 years ago.
I see that you still don't understands how to draw conclusions from data. You could try to read about trends, mean and variance.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Nov 22, 2013 - 12:17pm PT
Galntonly
That's not what you said in those p.m.'s. Anyhow, when you get done
tounge punching the fart box of your corporate overlords and wipe off the mess that THE Queef left on your face, only then might we have a rational
discussion

So posts the stooge that share photo's of his romantic partner preparing for the evenings escapades...





Just another perfect reason why this entire AGW deal is indeed nothing less than a charade of total imbeciles.

10 bucks says Weschrist and you are having a partner tissy fit separation.
dirtbag

climber
Nov 22, 2013 - 12:23pm PT
^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^



Now be a good little doggie and lick up your mess.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Nov 22, 2013 - 12:37pm PT
If that was indeed me Galloping Glanton boy, you would not be posting here nor anywhere else for that matter.




Sorry Dirtbag, you are assuredly have mistaken me for a close family member that definitely resembles me.

But dream on as does Wilbeer.





4th day in a row with temps well below normal and the 3rd straight day with snow flurries.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Nov 22, 2013 - 12:47pm PT
Crazier?

Nope. Not at all.


Just have far better time management skills and instantly shetcan useless items that cross paths with me without any delays.


Your tax money saw to that.
Sketch

Trad climber
Langley, VA
Nov 22, 2013 - 12:47pm PT
I see that you still don't understands how to draw conclusions from data. You could try to read about trends, mean and variance.

Okay, smart guy. What's the significance of global seaice area being the same (today) as it was 34 years ago? Enlighten us.
raymond phule

climber
Nov 22, 2013 - 12:49pm PT

4th day in a row with temps well below normal and the 3rd straight day with snow flurries.

O sh#t, that finally proves it. 4 days in a row!!!!!!
Sketch

Trad climber
Langley, VA
Nov 22, 2013 - 12:51pm PT
That's not what you said in those p.m.'s. Anyhow, when you get done
tounge punching the fart box of your corporate overlords and wipe off the mess that THE Queef left on your face, only then might we have a rational
discussion.

Nothing like a little homophobic humor to prove your a good liberal. Well done.
raymond phule

climber
Nov 22, 2013 - 12:55pm PT

Okay, smart guy. What's the significance of global seaice area being the same (today) as it was 34 years ago? Enlighten us.

What you wrote above is just a dishonest lie. Can you clarify what you try to say and back it up with some data?

The problem is that I cant manage to interpret the global sea ice data in any meaningful way such that the level today is the same as the level were 34 years ago.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Nov 22, 2013 - 01:07pm PT
Relapse. Not at all. The fog subsided some 13 years ago and the reality of life continues to be clearer as each new sober day passes.


Maybe you Fort and the rest of your completely delusional and AGW religious dooms dayer crew here should give it a go.

brave soldier.

There went your useless credibility. You assuredly fit in perfectly well with this AGW fear mongering crowd.




Hey RJ, it's snowing pretty good here at 4800ft. Got 2" on the front and back yard.

White Mtn RS indicates 1.2" of H20 so far this storm.
Sketch

Trad climber
Langley, VA
Nov 22, 2013 - 01:22pm PT
What you wrote above is just a dishonest lie. Can you clarify what you try to say and back it up with some data?

The problem is that I cant manage to interpret the global sea ice data in any meaningful way such that the level today is the same as the level were 34 years ago.

How nice. You accuse me of lying and then back away from proving it.

Here's a link that may help you out.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area.withtrend.jpg

Late '79 is below the mean. Today, it's above the mean.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Nov 22, 2013 - 01:28pm PT
Sketch thinks that because the current global sea ice anomaly reaches the average of a declining period, then it must be the same as it was 34 years ago.

Sketch is kinda funny that way.

Late '79 is below the mean. Today, it's above the mean.

And there's your answer Sketch. The early yearly cycle had to fall to reach the average. Today the yearly cycle has to rise to reach the average.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Nov 22, 2013 - 01:38pm PT
The early yearly cycle had to fall to reach the average. Today the yearly cycle has to rise to reach the average.

Of course that "average" has been set by no other than the consensus "climate scientist" that deem the dooms day AGW scenario must continue.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Nov 22, 2013 - 01:39pm PT
The average is calculated from 1979 to 2008, which is a declining period, dumbass.
raymond phule

climber
Nov 22, 2013 - 01:42pm PT

How nice. You accuse me of lying and then back away from proving it.

I just played a sketch. Remember that that you often call people dishonest and liars and of course without proving it. What you wrote are of course also dishonest if you actually had some knowledge about the subject.

Ok, I have seen that pic but I asked you to clarify what you meant.


Late '79 is below the mean. Today, it's above the mean.

So that were your point. I expected something like that. My first response is of course still correct. You just show that you are not able to analyze data if you think that actually means anything important. You should look up means, trends and variance.

So really whats is your point? The data show that the trend is decreasing, that the for example 5 year mean from 1979 is higher than the 5 year mean that stops today. So the total sea ice area is decreasing but the variability is large enough such that the level today is higher than the level 1979.

The clue might be that the area at the end of 1979 where below the mean of that period but the area today is above the mean for this period.

Cheery picking two data points for on analysis is really not a good data analysis method.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Nov 22, 2013 - 01:43pm PT
Like I said MONO, the parameter (Satellite data) has been set by the Climate Scientists that must proliferate the AGW scenario.
raymond phule

climber
Nov 22, 2013 - 01:44pm PT

Of course that "average" has been set by no other than the consensus "climate scientist" that deem the dooms day AGW scenario must continue.

One of the stupidest things I have read on this thread.
Ron Anderson

Trad climber
Relic MilkEye and grandpoobah of HBRKRNH
Nov 22, 2013 - 01:45pm PT
weve been arguing the same .06 for over a year, and that hasnt become .07 yet??? HUH?
Messages 16101 - 16120 of total 29629 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Trip Report and Articles
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews