Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 13241 - 13260 of total 26664 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
WBraun

climber
Sep 17, 2013 - 11:11am PT
You are indeed, a buttload. Similar to the one I just dropped in the bowl.

Stupid small children (elcapass) who always splash at the shallow end of the pool will always remain there ......
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Sep 17, 2013 - 11:20am PT
CAPNASS
Thanks for you and all your Brothers & Sisters busting your asses all them years for us!
(Fixed it for ya)

Yur welcome.

I am so glad you appreciate our efforts in keeping sorry spoiled little boy asses such as yourself free & safe to whine away without any repercussions from the Gov't that takes good care of your teet sucking ass.

BTW: We did not do it for you or the likes of you. But then you would not understand that either.



Whine away little boy ASSCAP. Whine away.


Shet! That actually looks like old DOCRILEY.... ha!
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Sep 17, 2013 - 11:55am PT
well we certainly succeeded in drawing you guys out of the closet , now didn't we? Let's forget the pretense of the "science", as after all, as Ed has made so clear, it's all about your left wing ideology. Ed et al- do you ever feel a twinge of shame, I mean your ideology is so far from pursuit of truth (science) that you can hardly call yourself a scientist anymore. How in the hell did you get so lost, so far from where you started?
Bruce Kay

Gym climber
BC
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:02pm PT
Arrogant, once again. Or selectively blind? Both are halmarks of the rightwing cherry pickers.

Speaking for myself, I have endlessly stated that I will follow where the science leads on this issue.

Can you say that? Before you answer remember that in order to agree you need to not only assert but also substantiate your reasons that the institutional science is wrong and your chosen contrarians are right.

Anyway, are you saying I am a strident eco nazi beholden to a mythic ideology?

Can you substantiate this?
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:03pm PT
fuking idiots
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:07pm PT
Reread your guys recent posts Bruce. The evidence is there plain as day.
Bruce Kay

Gym climber
BC
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:11pm PT
The other thing I find fascinating about right wingers is that you can ask them a completely simple unambiguous question and they will take two days to eventually avoid answering it.

Well see ya on the flip side. I'm off to exercise my inalienable entitlement to self reliance, so long as I can find a reliable partner to hold the rope....
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:21pm PT
Once again you totally miss the point Bruce. You can't separate yourself from your ideological programming and standardized response long enough to examine the more subtle implications of self reliance- little hint it's not survivalism in isolation.
Ron Anderson

Trad climber
Soon to be Nipple suckling Liberal
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:22pm PT
You know what the Polar Bears are singing today?


" Weeellllllll if da ice is a rockin dont bother knockin, if the ice is a rockin, dont bother knockin~~~if da ice is rockin dont bother -come on in!!"
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:30pm PT
The light is shining on the roaches!!

149 Nations are gathering in Stockholm next week with some 40 authors/reps of the IPCC's recent AR5 asking some real hard questions regarding the "Official" admissions from the latest report.

Those Nations want some valid simple answers. Many are not happy one bit at the money they have been contributing to the IPCC and their research only to have the latest confessions come outta the recent AR5.

Shet flows down hill big time. GISS and NOAA are looking at the same investigations as their "data" and "models" are all part of this totally inaccurate across the board misinformation that has been perpetuated the last 5 to 7 years by the IPCC. Appears the "Consensus" has been disseminating a slew of bad and misleading beta to the worlds policy makers.

It is not looking good for the "Consensus" train. Not atal.


EDH
don't like the answer..

Sorry ED. But it is NOT the only answer available as you and the others insist it is.

There lies the problem.
Chiloe

Trad climber
Lee, NH
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:42pm PT
well we certainly succeeded in drawing you guys out of the closet , now didn't we? Let's forget the pretense of the "science", as after all, as Ed has made so clear, it's all about your left wing ideology. Ed et al- do you ever feel a twinge of shame, I mean your ideology is so far from pursuit of truth (science) that you can hardly call yourself a scientist anymore. How in the hell did you get so lost, so far from where you started?

Rick, you're on Fantasy Island again. Reality can't reach you out there, I don't think there was ever much chance that it would.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:43pm PT
The fact that your vocabulary and store of knowledge is greater than the other monkeys supporting your position, in baffled awe by your b.s. pronouncements, does not make the gist of what you profess science. Look around Ed, the science is leaving your position behind, it's moving on to to discovery and explanation of all the natural components that CAGW ignored. If you doubt this just look at the flood of new papers. Your not in so deep that you can't make a graceful turn.


You know Chiloe, Larry, there are other things to study in those ice cores other than the single minded obsession with doom by CO2. I suggest you start looking at those.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:48pm PT
Professor Judith Curry, head of climate science at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, said the leaked Summary for Policy-makers showed that ‘the science is clearly not settled, and is in a state of flux’. She said it therefore made no sense that the IPCC was claiming that its confidence in its forecasts and conclusions has increased. ‘The consensus-seeking process used by the IPCC creates and amplifies biases in the science. It should be abandoned in favour of a more traditional review that presents arguments for and against which would better support scientific progress, and be more useful for policy makers.

Nations asking the latest questions are listening to Dr. Christy btw.

Appears they are coming to agreement that the "Consensus seeking process" has failed miserably evidenced by the admissions in the AR5.


Dr Benny Peiser, of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, described the leaked report as a ‘staggering concoction of confusion, speculation and sheer ignorance’. As for the pause, he said ‘it would appear that the IPCC is running out of answers… to explain why there is a widening gap between predictions and reality’.

The UK's House of Commons as well as the newly elected Prime Minister of Australia are listening very attentively to this "diatribe" btw.
Chiloe

Trad climber
Lee, NH
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:52pm PT
You know Chiloe, Larry, there are other things to study in those ice cores other than the single minded obsession with doom by CO2. I suggest you start looking at those.

It's impressive how many wildly false assumptions you can pack into each sentence, while lecturing people in absolute certainty that you're right.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:56pm PT
Chiloe,

Please!!

Do not even suggest that you are unbias in your work. Please!
Wade Icey

Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:57pm PT
I blame global warming on the Co2 being generated by this thread.

rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Sep 17, 2013 - 12:59pm PT
Ok Larry, perhaps I am wrong and your range of study is far greater than that in support of the CAGW hypothesis. Well then, let me apologize if you would be so good as to inform us of your studies, especially that that is applicable to our lives and times.
Chiloe

Trad climber
Lee, NH
Sep 17, 2013 - 02:49pm PT
Ok Larry, perhaps I am wrong and your range of study is far greater than that in support of the CAGW hypothesis. Well then, let me apologize if you would be so good as to inform us of your studies, especially that that is applicable to our lives and times.

Quite the poser, Rick. And still stacking up false assumptions so deep you can't see them.
Malemute

Ice climber
the ghost
Sep 17, 2013 - 04:43pm PT
Self Reliant ???
what a JOKE!

You 3 deniers are completely RELIANT on blogs for your OPINIONS.
Ed IS self reliant because he can understand the science. You deniers can't.

You are NOT self reliant, you are SYCOPHANTS, ASS KISSERS, DILETTANTS.
Elcapinyoazz

Social climber
Joshua Tree
Sep 17, 2013 - 04:44pm PT
be so good as to inform us of your studies

Yeah, because it's sooo damn hard to go pull his CV from the CareyInst and read it. Show some initiative, Rick, you champion of self-reliance.
Messages 13241 - 13260 of total 26664 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Trip Report and Articles
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews