Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 12681 - 12700 of total 25982 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Bruce Kay

Gym climber
BC
Sep 12, 2013 - 11:57am PT
And as predicted like clock work we get Wernerized!!!!
WBraun

climber
Sep 12, 2013 - 11:59am PT
Just please go away Bruce.

You are a pathetic excuse for a human being ......
Bruce Kay

Gym climber
BC
Sep 12, 2013 - 12:02pm PT
go away? Hell I was just thinking of doing my annual californication holliday.

Don't worry, I'll do my best to avoid crossing paths with you and The Dick
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Sep 12, 2013 - 12:06pm PT
Models do show that long temp slowdowns are possible, they just can't give good timing yet.

Bullshet!

The past 15 plus year hiatus was never indicated on the current 40 something models. Never!











That is one of the major obvious failures that the EU and other nations that are contributing money to the IPCC want to know about and are now very concerned as to the research process.

The house of cards is coming down. When that AR5 is officially released, shet is gonna hit the fan. Big time.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Sep 12, 2013 - 12:06pm PT
There are all kinds of models, Chief, not just the ones you focus on.

How do you think this gif was generated?



The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Sep 12, 2013 - 12:12pm PT
DUDE! That "gif" you continue posting does not indicate the hiatus either. Not one of em.

DAH!



they just can't give good timing yet.

More importantly, they are not certain what the hell is causing them.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Sep 12, 2013 - 12:13pm PT
Yer not very bright, are ya Chief. You can see several hiatus periods there.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Sep 12, 2013 - 12:15pm PT
The 15 year straight running hiatus IS NOT INDICATED in any of em.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Sep 12, 2013 - 12:15pm PT
Of course it is visible, Chief. Try to focus.
Bruce Kay

Gym climber
BC
Sep 12, 2013 - 12:18pm PT
I think he is saying he dosn't see it, so it can't exist.
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Sep 12, 2013 - 12:21pm PT
Since it seems nothing can be done to roll back climate change, the question that arises is:

What's better? Doing nothing? Or doing something ineffective? That seems to be our choice here.
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Sep 12, 2013 - 12:30pm PT
Of course it is visible, Chief. Try to focus.

Two weeks ago you were up and down screaming the stall was not occurring at all.

Now you say and agree it is.


Busted Mono!
Bruce Kay

Gym climber
BC
Sep 12, 2013 - 12:37pm PT
here's the trip that Roy Spencer is on.






Chuff and Werner think there is no problem here, move along sheeple.....
The Chief

climber
From the Land of the Mongols
Sep 12, 2013 - 12:42pm PT
So BRUCSKY..

Appears that you and Craig Fry are on the same sheet of paper.



Unless anyone conforms to and agrees with your ideology, they are deemed all the hate notions that the two of you imply.


Sounds perfectly acceptable huh?



Now what was that about burning all them witches back in the Dark Ages????
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Sep 12, 2013 - 01:23pm PT
So, the whole base of current CAGW science is built upon the notion that the warming of the immediate past (1977-1998), is both more rapid, and of higher levels than that seen in any other period of the Holocene over the last 13,000 years. To support this notion, huge amounts of time and money were spent to marginalize rapid, intense, changes like the little ice age, medieval warm period, dark ages and roman warm period. The prevailing and false narrative in the CAGW community is that these periods were not only less intense than the modern warm period but were regional in extent rather than global. The Medieval warm period has been falsely isolated to the area of the north Atlantic. Below is a link to synopsis of a 2011 paper demonstrating that the Medieval Warm Period extended all the way to southern south America. More to follow-let's digest one at a time.

http://www.co2science.org/articles/V14/N50/C3.php
bookworm

Social climber
Falls Church, VA
Sep 12, 2013 - 01:33pm PT
garbage in, garbage out:

http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs/Climate%20change/Climate%20model%20results/over%20estimate.pdf



no wonder those "consensus" scientists don't want to share their data
Bruce Kay

Gym climber
BC
Sep 12, 2013 - 02:39pm PT
Ah Bookworm! What is your opinion on my accusations directed toward Roy Spencer?
Elcapinyoazz

Social climber
Joshua Tree
Sep 12, 2013 - 02:51pm PT
the whole base of current CAGW science is built upon the notion

No, it isn't. You don't even grasp the most basic concepts involved. You love to keep droning on and on about medieval warm periods and little ice ages and all that.

Your "notion" from above has nothing to do with the science that AGW is built upon. You love to create a strawman, and voila, here's another of them.

Whether there were past natural drivers that exceeded current anthopogenic forced warming rates, has exactly f*#k-all do with the "notion" that AGW science is built upon.

What's with the strawman fetish? Get diddled to the Wizard of Oz as kid or something?

dirtbag

climber
Sep 12, 2013 - 02:53pm PT
Waste of time arguing with chief bw Ron and others...
Ron Anderson

Trad climber
Soon to be Nipple suckling Liberal
Sep 12, 2013 - 02:57pm PT
The models are failures, the boat she is a leakin

better man the lifeboats is what you should be thinkin

Messages 12681 - 12700 of total 25982 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews