The history of New Dimensions?

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 101 - 105 of total 105 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
drF

Trad climber
usa
Jun 18, 2017 - 11:48pm PT
^^^^
Wacky to the casual observer but man I can't disagree with that rating's scale
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jun 19, 2017 - 12:31am PT
Most rock climbers aren't mathematicians, or logicians.
Pete_N

Trad climber
Santa Cruz, CA
Oct 8, 2018 - 12:47pm PT
Damn! I love that take on how 5.11 breaks down... thanks Munge and Brutus!
ground_up

Trad climber
mt. hood /baja
Oct 8, 2018 - 01:15pm PT
Munge that is spot on !
Alexey

climber
San Jose, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Oct 8, 2018 - 03:49pm PT
5.11a 5.10d 5.11- 5.11b 5.11 5.11c 5.9 squeeze 5.11+
5.10 OW 5.12a 5.11d

I think this chart is misleading.
If you equally climb thin and wide cracks and face climbs Yosemite grades sequence going generally from low numbers to hight numbers, with small exception of routes first climbed in early 60 th and rated below 5.10
Messages 101 - 105 of total 105 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta