Clean Your Forest - f!'n idiot!

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 21 - 40 of total 51 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
ionlyski

Trad climber
Polebridge, Montana
Nov 19, 2018 - 11:56am PT
Point is, with the saturation we have today, living out in the woods with our trophy homes and all the valuables, you can't really just let it burn. And it needs to burn.

I've got my party pad in the woods but if it burns I hope I won't spend all my time blaming the Forest Circus.

edit-these California cities that are burning down completely are different . Don't know what the answers are there.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Nov 19, 2018 - 12:04pm PT
FRUMY

Trad climber
Bishop,CA
Nov 19, 2018 - 12:17pm PT
It here started in Ca. decades ago.
Roots

Mountain climber
Redmond, Oregon
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 19, 2018 - 02:37pm PT
"Cleaning" our forest almost all year 'round...


https://www.ktvz.com/news/blm-prineville-district-to-begin-fall-pile-burning/876147185
limpingcrab

Trad climber
the middle of CA
Nov 19, 2018 - 03:06pm PT
Simplified summary: Couple thousand years with normal (meaning drier) California climate and tons of fires. Then about 100 wetter than normal years with extra plant growth and fire suppression.

California returns to normal precipitation (that people call a drought since it’s dry relative to the short history as a state) with the addition of approximately 10x more trees than normal, lots of dead fire fuel, and lots of houses mixed in with the tinder.



Not sure what the solution is but the problem is pretty simple.
mouse from merced

Trad climber
The finger of fate, my friends, is fickle.
Nov 19, 2018 - 04:36pm PT
It's possible to manage a forest, but impossible to manage the wind and other climatic phenomena.
--Mariah Mariah
Lollie

Social climber
I'm Lolli.
Nov 19, 2018 - 04:54pm PT
Well, it isn't done all over Finland. 80% of the country is forest. In the Arctic. Not exactly the same climate as California.
They do monitor the forests though.

https://twitter.com/anttiholma/status/1063907282973544448/photo/1

The Finns are having fun.
"You can tell your friend in the White House, that ALL finns rake thousands of hectares every day!"
mouse from merced

Trad climber
The finger of fate, my friends, is fickle.
Nov 19, 2018 - 05:16pm PT
Hilarious stuff, Lollie.
Lollie

Social climber
I'm Lolli.
Nov 19, 2018 - 05:17pm PT
Pretty lady with a rake, Mouse :-)
i-b-goB

Social climber
Nutty
Nov 19, 2018 - 05:29pm PT
Fuel Treatments: Thinning and Prescribed Burns

https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/research/fire/fuel-treatments.shtml
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Nov 19, 2018 - 07:19pm PT
I believe that forest thousands of years ago, burned without being suppressed or managed. -not what residents want now.

the forest lands were in equilibrium with the seasonal fires ignited by natural sources. Thousands of years ago this was probably still human managed in the Sierra, at least in many places.

But the point is that our current forests are very much out of equilibrium, and humans are trying to keep the disequilibrium going. Initially (in the 1950s) it was to protect lumber resources, now it is to protect homes and buildings.

Driving in the western slopes of the Sierra it is difficult to see how humans will continue to keep the situation as it is.
ionlyski

Trad climber
Polebridge, Montana
Nov 19, 2018 - 09:46pm PT
Ed-couldn't agree more. What are we to do?

Everything burns. Log-it burns. Thin-it burns. Section of forest that burned significantly a year, two or ten years ago-it burns. Seems that old growth is sometimes spared and I often wonder if that's because old growth, especially on both sides of a stream contains more water.

Anyway, none of these types of management mimic what natural fires do. They just don't. I also wonder if the more thinning I do, the more that land dries out, is hotter, soil content and plant structure changes but doesn't really reduce my fire hazard.

Prescribed burning I think is good but very risky. Again, not to be confused with burning piles but lighting your whole forest on fire during "safe" conditions. But that does a much better job of mimicking what fires did, before fire mitigation of the 1900's. Think about how much undergrowth was regularly burned out, leaving larger, more fire resistant trees, like Ponderosa and Western Larch.

Arne
ionlyski

Trad climber
Polebridge, Montana
Nov 19, 2018 - 09:51pm PT
I've often said the real problem is people; more and more of them living out in the forest, spread out all over the place and that people really belong concentrated in cities because forests need to burn, in order to be what they are-forests.

But now with these fires you have in California that doesn't seem to be the case anymore.
jonnyrig

climber
Nov 20, 2018 - 07:22am PT
Somewhere in the distant forests of Finland, the wild Roomba quietly does its important work clearing the undergrowth.

Thank you internet.
Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Nov 26, 2018 - 08:19pm PT
once an f'n idiot, always an f'n idiot
Flip Flop

climber
Earth Planet, Universe
Nov 26, 2018 - 10:17pm PT
We rake by the ton in Tahoe as part of regular and prescribed Defensible Space and Tree work. Here come the hysterics
couchmaster

climber
Nov 27, 2018 - 05:27am PT


ontheedgeandscaredtodeath

Social climber
Wilds of New Mexico
Nov 27, 2018 - 07:49am PT
The idea that logging reduces fire risk is false, no matter the source. The problem is the slash, which isn't economical to remove.

Check this out:

https://gacc.nifc.gov/rmcc/predictive/Fire%20Behavior%20Fuel%20Model%20Descriptions.pdf

You will see that the heaviest fuel load per acre is slash. My own experience is that fires RIP through slash, and it's almost impossible to do anything about it.

ionlyski

Trad climber
Polebridge, Montana
Nov 27, 2018 - 08:38am PT
^^^^When two high profile fires on two sides of my land erupted this summer, the combined
agencies poured millions into them, creating all kinds of ineffective jobs, even though both fires
did not breach 1000 acres together. The biggest joke were the fire lines they punched through,
connecting roads that were 1 mile apart. You can't even walk those lines now due to all the slash
scattered everywhere. There's way more fuel now chopped up into kindling by their masticators.
They don't cut, but chew it up and throw it all around. Nobody in forest management seems to
actually touch any tree or bend down to pick something up or even get out of their truck or heavy equipment.

I know that is stereotyping but it is what we've seen in our area.

Arne
i'm gumby dammit

Sport climber
da ow
Nov 27, 2018 - 09:08am PT
We have loads of fuel load removal here in Tahoe and every year we see the recurring debate about how some don't want to deal with the smoke from the controlled burns.
As far as the masticators leaving behind tons of slash everywhere that is just a matter of funding. There are various levels of treatments available and each has an associated cost. I'll try to post up some pics of the current program that's been in my back yard all summer later.
And fuel reduction plans are driven at least as much by profit as by environmental concerns. For instance the Camp Fire burned through areas that had already been managed, had already burned, and were nothing but brush and scrub oak. There is no way to manage that land without 100% government funding because there is no profit for the timber companies there. And the government funding isn't there and is dropping.
Messages 21 - 40 of total 51 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta