North Korea

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 172 of total 172 in this topic
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Original Post - Jul 5, 2017 - 09:20am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Jul 5, 2017 - 09:22am PT
Just another malcontent posting grievances. Life is great there...just ask Dennis Rodman.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Jul 5, 2017 - 10:14am PT
Salty dog! There are a lot of suffering people around the world. Hard to go on living well without some sort of defenses. Where to draw the line for personal survival against the sea of grief, versus what personal responsibilities to take? What personal actions really make a difference versus which are worthless hand-wringing?
Studly

Trad climber
WA
Jul 5, 2017 - 10:21am PT
Incoming!

I love how she says North Korea is a terrible country since there is only one channel on TV, and no internet. That would crush the souls of most people who post on here.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Jul 5, 2017 - 10:28am PT
Nutagain, maybe you already read this Atlantic piece by Mark Bowden?

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/07/the-worst-problem-on-earth/528717/

I thought it was good, informative. Food for thought in these trumpian times.

re: Acceptance

"Every option the United States has for dealing with North Korea is bad. But accepting it as a nuclear power may be the least bad."

Cut yourself some slack. Our ancestors didn't evolve to "take in" the entire world and all its goings-on incl all its problems all the time every day let alone every hour via social media. I know you know this, it's just worth remembering from time to time.

...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park_Yeon-mi


Park Yeon-mi

"Park rose to global prominence after she delivered a speech at the One Young World 2014 Summit in Dublin, Ireland — an annual summit that gathers young people from around the world to develop solutions to global problems.[3] Her speech, about her experience escaping from North Korea, received 50 million views in two days on YouTube and social media, with a current total of more than 80 million."
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Jul 5, 2017 - 10:34am PT
Her father dies and her mother raped in front of her while escaping, people executed for making an international phone call, multiple generations of families jailed for expressing doubt about the government, and never reading or seeing stories of love, just about support for the present administration? That stuff jumped out at me more than the one TV channel. I guess we all have our own ways of expressing grief and accepting things that we don't seem to have the power to change. Being vulnerable to honestly express our feelings and sharing awareness of injustice is better than doing nothing in my opinion. Being hard in the face of injustice and moving on just empowers its spread in the world. Having empathy and spreading awareness develops the soil in which seeds of resistance and change can grow. That is something, and it personally costs us little.
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Jul 5, 2017 - 11:42am PT
NutAgain!, it does not sound like you are going to be booking a ski vacation there anytime soon, though I've read there is fairly exceptional untracked backcountry powder.

https://www.skimag.com/ski-resort-life/great-pleasure-project

On a serious note, I've spent some time with North Koreans when I lived in Mainland China. They were in a strange position, knowing about the reality of the outside world, yet having to submit and obey their government, as they had relatives still within the DPRK.

Hubbard

climber
San Diego
Jul 5, 2017 - 11:50am PT
In WW2 Russia dismantled all the factories they could and moved the machinery one thousand miles by train and rebuilt them and started pumping out tanks from behind the Ural mountains where they were safe from the German advance. They did this in about six months time. They won the war by this decision.
The main threat from North Korea is the artillery attack they could launch on Seoul the capital of South Korea. Remove this target and they have very little leverage. North Korea has about three weeks of fuel to drive their tanks around. After that they are stuck in the mud.
As impractical as it may sound, one solution is to do as the Russians did. Move the capital Seoul to the southern end of the peninsula, well out of artillery range and rebuild. Evacuate the people and as much capital as possible then launch our own attack and crush the punk North. Sounds crazy but the Russians did it and it worked. The Russians had no choice. It was act or perish. Everyone now is twiddling their thumbs and kicking the can in hope that the problem will go away: it won't. Just a thought based on the study of history.
It would be easier to assassinate Kim and maybe that will happen.
dirtbag

climber
Jul 5, 2017 - 11:55am PT
There are no good options, except as posted above, acceptance (and hope for a regime change) is the least bad.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 5, 2017 - 12:06pm PT
The Prediction is:

That Trump will need Russia's help to take care of North Korea,
and to get their help we will have to lift the sanctions and give back the Russian embassies and compounds in DC

But of course this is only because Trump owes Russia big time
and Russia want those sanctions lifted by Trump
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 5, 2017 - 12:28pm PT
Russia? Really? Why would they give a hoot? Oh, sure, they'd probably see
some refugees trying to get to Vladivostok. The operative word is 'trying'.
But they'd be laughing their asses off in the Kremlin.

This whole thang depends on China putting on their big boy pants and acting
like a real world power. They could put a stop to this in weeks if they
wanted to. If it goes south, so to speak, it will cost them plenty, unless
they just mow down the millions of refugees who will flood the border.

As for the vaunted artillery barrage which would 'level' Seoul a few hundred
cruise missiles would wipe out most of that threat really quickly. When
those N Korean troops see real shock and awe they will defect so fast it'll
make yer heads spin.
Yury

Mountain climber
T.O.
Jul 5, 2017 - 12:35pm PT
NutAgain!

Her father dies and her mother raped in front of her while escaping, people executed for making an international phone call, multiple generations of families jailed for expressing doubt about the government, and never reading or seeing stories of love ...
The life in North Korea is tough. I do not question this.

However I noticed a red flag in the above list.
How exactly was able a person to make an international call in a system that was designed to prevent such occurences?
It seems like a pure fantasy.
As a result it's plausible that some other "facts" in the above list were also invented.
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Jul 5, 2017 - 01:23pm PT
How exactly was able a person to make an international call in a system that was designed to prevent such occurences?

Yury - http://bfy.tw/CgAP ;-)

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/23/north-korean-executed-for-communicating-with-outside-world

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1255375/North-Korean-man-executed-calling-friend-South-Korea-mobile-phone.html

He is believed to be the first person to be shot since the capital, Pyongyang, tightened a crackdown on illegal mobile phones last month.

North Korea does allow mobile phones to be used, but they have to be registered and their range is limited to Pyongyang.

However Chinese mobile phones with pre-paid cards that make international calls possible have been distributed through the black market.

It is the owners of these phones who have been targeted by the country's secret police.

The execution of Jung is expected to be deliberately leaked by the regime as a warning to others who own similar phones.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 5, 2017 - 01:49pm PT
Russia, China: N Korea missile test 'unacceptable'


Putin, Xi urge "comprehensive resolution" to Korean Peninsula issue as UN Security Council calls emergency meeting.

Russia and China have called for a simultaneous freeze on North Korean nuclear and missile tests and military exercises by the United States and South Korea.

The positions were announced in a joint document issued after a meeting between leaders Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping in the Russian capital of Moscow on Tuesday, in which they also condemned Pyongyang's latest missile test as "unacceptable" and urged against "any statements or actions that could lead to an increase in tensions".

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/07/russia-china-korea-missile-test-unacceptable-170704145934120.html
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 5, 2017 - 01:51pm PT
Putin sends troops to Russia's border with North Korea after China also sends soldiers to its boundary over fears Trump will attack Kim Jong-un, sparking a tidal wave of refugees

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4428384/Putin-sends-troops-Russia-s-border-North-Korea.html#ixzz4lzbP5fMb

Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jul 5, 2017 - 01:54pm PT
...unless
they just mow down the millions of refugees who will flood the border.

It's not like they haven't done it before.

Sometimes I think the Chinese see the Korea situation as being to their advantage. While everyone's eyes are on Korea, the Chinese are taking over the Asian Pacific. Diversion tactics?

Hubbard

climber
San Diego
Jul 5, 2017 - 02:04pm PT
A lot of NK artillery has been worked on for fifty years of bunkering. Blast door opens, gun fires, blast door closes. Cruise missiles would get only a percentage. The guns can keep firing for days or weeks. We might need the cruise missiles for other important chores. Heavily bunkered guns are not easy to move. People on the other hand can just walk away. We are talking about a war after all. The Western powers could do their thing. We crushed Japan and Germany. We occupied them fully and look at the result: two of the best countries on the planet. America has been playing smash and run ever since WW2. Too scared to do the real job. That is just the way it is. It would be best if everyone just smiled and got along... I'm not seeing it. Russia crushes their people. No thanks. Live like the Chinese ? Forget it, they are not free. Islamic countries? Woman's oppression is complete in those countries. That is not the future. The West is flawed and one foot out of three is built on sh#t but we are a far cry better than the others where two out of the three legs is built on... Radical problems require radical solutions. Radical solutions start out as crazy ideas. Not everything can be solved by hugs.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Jul 5, 2017 - 02:17pm PT
Hubbard, interesting, thought-provoking posts.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Jul 5, 2017 - 02:19pm PT
Have a clandestine operative(Chinese, Russian, or 'merican) take out KJU, problem solved.
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Jul 5, 2017 - 02:23pm PT
For anyone who hasn't seen it and is interested in North Korea, I highly recommend the British documentary, "Crossing The Line". One of the wildest movies I've seen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossing_the_Line_(2006_film)

Netflix has a better quality stream than what's below.

[Click to View YouTube Video]
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 5, 2017 - 02:33pm PT
Cruise missiles would get only a percentage

Yeah, like 90%. And its really hard to fire yer POS gun when the doors
are blasted along with yer ammo. And if you go outside for a few minutes
the drones and A-10's will have a field day. Remember, there won't be
radar installation or C&C center one left after the first 10 minutes. You
don't really think the Pentagon doesn't have this gamed to the second, do
you? Every target is programmed by priority. It will be a slaughter. I
say 10,000 S Korean casualties and 100,000 N Korean troops within the
first couple of hours. They'll be running south with white hankys flying
by the tens of thousands, after they slaughter their officers.

Here's some numbers. There is about 20 miles, to be generous, of the border
where the N Koreans could have artillery that could reach the northern parts
of Seoul. If the US Navy uses 400 cruise missiles, about 10% of their
inventory, that would be 20 missiles per mile, or one every 250 feet. Even if
a gun is bunkered there is going to be SERIOUS damage to the bunker. Then
the A-10's and F-18's come in to clean up anybody stoopid enough to be
above ground.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Jul 5, 2017 - 02:46pm PT
Yeah, why not?
Why not move the whole city of Seoul?

Best case scenario, say 100 yrs from now... two Seouls instead of one.

Wiki says artillery batteries have a max range of... 20-50 miles.


Interesting idea. Heard it here first.


Why not? As Hubbard pointed out, after all we are talking about war scenarios in a war context.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 5, 2017 - 02:48pm PT
Wiki says artillery batteries have a max range of... 20-50 miles.

Wiki people smoke crack? 20 miles is probably 5 miles beyond the range of
most of those POS guns. And the bigger the gun the better the target it is.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Jul 5, 2017 - 02:50pm PT
So that's even better, no?


Looks like S Korea has a 200 300 mile margin within which to work/build.
Heck, why not three Seouls?! South Korea could out-commercialize its opponent. In the Shenzhen, China spirit, too! lol


If we're already taking part in the Acceptance / Patience phase, why not? Is there a steelman (cf: strawman) argument against? If so, let's hear it.

The whole project could be construed a) as creative problem solving and b) as taking the high road ("when they go low, we go high").

...

re: tactical nuclear possibilities

"Specifically on the Korean peninsula with a nuclear armed North Korea facing off against a NPT compliant South Korea there have been calls to request a return of US owned and operated short range low yield nuclear weapons, nomenclatured as tactical by the US military, to provide a local strategic deterrent to the North's growing domestically produced nuclear arsenal and delivery systems."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_nuclear_weapon

re: NPT

"As of August 2016, 191 states have adhered to the treaty, though North Korea, which acceded in 1985 but never came into compliance, announced its withdrawal from the NPT in 2003, following detonation of nuclear devices in violation of core obligations."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Non-Proliferation_of_Nuclear_Weapons
Hubbard

climber
San Diego
Jul 5, 2017 - 03:06pm PT
If Reilly is right then all the better. I am a conservative fog of war kind of person. Hoping for the best doesn't come easy for me. I have no problem using two ropes or backing up the pro before a big run-out. It's more of a hassle obviously. I wish I could free-solo El Cap.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jul 5, 2017 - 03:23pm PT
I wouldn't want to be one of the 30K+ American soldiers deployed along the DMZ, and referred to as the "trip wire."
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 5, 2017 - 03:37pm PT
^^^ True, but unless China steps in and pulls the plug on Phat Boy I don't
see a sanitary solution to this. Guys like him are at heart nihilists and
that's related to annihilate, for all intents and purposes. We've had
65 years of wannabe Neville Chamberlains 'working' on this, to what end?
jgill

Boulder climber
The high prairie of southern Colorado
Jul 5, 2017 - 04:07pm PT
Is there any indication Un's top-ranking military leaders would not continue his policies were he out of the picture? That may be wishful thinking.
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Jul 5, 2017 - 04:09pm PT
China will not accept a unified Korean penisula friendly to the west. Trump needs to use his magical deal making powers to convince China to take Kim out and replace him with a Chinese stooge. Maybe Putin can give them tips.
Studly

Trad climber
WA
Jul 5, 2017 - 05:08pm PT
Whoa, say hey DMT, did I touch a nerve or what?
I guess North Korea is a little paranoid towards us, since we killed off half the country and leveled their cities in the Korean War because they...hmm...errrr...not sure why we had to kill them and bomb them, but Im sure there is a really good reason, maybe they hated our freedom, and we just couldn't have that. But can you really blame them for trying to protect themselves when they already been laid waste to once before? Even a cornered rat will fight back if you trap it.
Hubbard

climber
San Diego
Jul 5, 2017 - 09:13pm PT
Studly, in the 1951-53 war, it was started when the North attacked the South. The united nations were involved. It was not America being brash. Turkey was there and all the common wealth nations. We pushed the North back North. It could have ended right there but Macarthur the famous WW2 general pushed on all the way to the border of China at the Yalu river. That is when the Chinese attacked, not before. As Stahlbro pointed out; the Chinese couldn't have us right on the border with Macarthur threatening to drive on to the Chinese capitol. US president Truman relieved Macarthur at this point. The Chinese attacked with massive human waves of lightly armed soldiers and this worked to push the UN forces back South to where they are now. The whole thing stalemated and has been like that ever since. Of note is that South Korea is a modern powerhouse while the North is a shithole. That is the difference between American sponsorship or Russian/ Chinese scraps. As for now and the future, it is a big question.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Jul 5, 2017 - 09:26pm PT
Personally I suspect 400 cruise missiles would in no way prevent N Korea's frontline forces from completely leveling Seoul. About the only potentially effective military option I see would be an attempt at decapitating their leadership.


Of note is that South Korea is a modern powerhouse while the North is a shithole

The whole of N Korea is a DMZ between us and the Chinese and, as such, the Chinese never had much interest in investing in the place.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jul 6, 2017 - 05:42am PT
There is no military option save war, likely nuclear. Get used to it. The inexperience clown in the WH is finding that out.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Jul 6, 2017 - 06:56am PT
That's likely the case (the war part, not the nuclear), but decapitation offers at least a slim opportunity for some calmer heads to prevail. As far as the nuclear option goes, I'd be very surprised if they have any deployed operational nukes because a) they're not there yet in terms of nukes deployable as warheads and b) at the rate dear leader been murdering generals I'd guess he definitely doesn't trust anyone enough to hand off that set of keys. There is a remote possibility he has a couple test-like bombs pre-placed in a tunnel somewhere, but that's technically quite dodgy and it's again unlikely he'd trust anyone with the keys.
Yury

Mountain climber
T.O.
Jul 6, 2017 - 07:08am PT
Thank you kunlun_shan for clarifying that a smuggled cell phone was used near the border of China.

According to this article:
“Some people are asking why he was killed just because of the money thing, but there are a few who were close to him and his wife, and they say it was because he had been helping defections.”

When reading and validating stories about North Korea I ask a question "What would Stalin, Mao, Fidel do in a similar situation?"

You need to understand that these regimes present a story about helping people.
So they can't just kill a person for violation of a phone calls rule.
This person need to commit "real" offense like helping defectors or sharing sensitive defence information or spreading lies about "beautiful Korean life".
Yury

Mountain climber
T.O.
Jul 6, 2017 - 07:19am PT
Reilly

^^^ True, but unless China steps in and pulls the plug on Phat Boy I don't
see a sanitary solution to this.
Reily, do you really believe that Chinese prefer having US troops stationed near their border rather than current North Korean regime?
I do not think so.

Also you need to know that China from historical statistical point of view is very peaceful country.
How many direct invasions by Chinese do you recall e.g. in the last century?
So direct military invasion to overthrow the current Pyongyang regime is not consistent with Chinese way of doing business.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 6, 2017 - 07:38am PT
Also you need to know that China from historical statistical point of view is very peaceful country.

I don't know why I need to know that except for it being your premise for a flawed argument.
The Tibetans, Indians, Vietnamese, Phillipinos, and Russians might disagree with you. We'll
agree to overlook their coming into the Korean War on the side of the aggressors.

You also misread my statement about 'pulling the plug' on Phat Boy. The N Korean economy,
if you can call it that, exists at the pleasure of Chairman Xi. He can turn the oil spigot off in a
Beijing Minute, no 'invasion' necessary. They also get a goodly amount courtesy of yer buddy
Volodya Putin. Chairman Xi can also order his minions to cease and desist abetting Phatty
in many other economic endeavors, that is if Ji wanted to run a "very peaceful country."
Can you say Spratly Islands?

re oil imports from China and Russia:
http://www.nkeconwatch.com/category/energy/oil/
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Jul 6, 2017 - 08:19am PT
How many direct invasions by Chinese do you recall e.g. in the last century?

Two, not including the territory around the Spratly Islands. Tibet was invaded in 1950, though Chinese control was not very firmly established. There was heavy resistance and guerrilla warfare broke out around 1956 in Aamdo (now called "Qinghai Province") with nomadic tribesman, who were always somewhat independent from Lhasa. As we all know, the Dala Lama fled Tibet in 1959 and Tibet became "Xizang Province".

The PLA also established control over what's now called "Xinjiang Province", in the early 1950s. Depending on one's view of history, the far western regions of China, beyond the end of the Great Wall, and the outpost of Dunhuang, were NOT part of China. Talk to any Uighur about this (preferably in Turkish based language), or other central Asian "minority". China now includes all of these peoples in their vision of a unified China, but establishment of their current borders is a relatively modern event.
MikeL

Social climber
Southern Arizona
Jul 6, 2017 - 08:57am PT
I think Reilly said that the North Korea’s gun placements are all in bunkers. I served just behind the DMZ in artillery, about 11 clicks away. From Seoul to the DMZ is about 35 miles or so, if memory serves me well. Some guns can reach that far, but most can’t with reliable accuracy. The U.S. and NATO forces have updated 155mm howitzers that have reached out 22 miles operationally, but It’s doubtful that NK has that kind of technology. Tactical missiles are more likely the armament that NK would use at that distance, and they aren’t likely to be accurate either. The problem with hard placements for artillery is flanking by enemy forces.

When I served in Korea long ago, our guns were also hard placed into concrete firing positions, aimed at bridges. If NK came south, it was our job to throw 3-10 rounds in the guns, hook up the guns to deuce-and-a-halfs, and run like hell south. We would regroup south of Seoul for the inevitable territory regain. Of course Seoul would be razed aflame, but the final outcome was always clear.

Many people would die. It would all be so very stupid.
monolith

climber
state of being
Jul 6, 2017 - 09:04am PT
https://worldview.stratfor.com/analysis/how-north-korea-would-retaliate

Shown below is North Korea artillery capability by range:

healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Jul 6, 2017 - 09:10am PT
Unfortunately, they don't need to be accurate or precise. All they need is to lob as much sh#t as possible in a swath from Guri through Seoul to Incheon and South Korea will be thrown into ruin and a decades-long economic dark ages on top of suffering a massive loss of life.
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Jul 6, 2017 - 09:52am PT
Diversion tactics?

Of course. Are you not entertained?

NK serves as an outlet for both China and the US to play with our war machines paid for with proceeds stolen from the populace's efforts.

If China wanted him dead, he'd be dead. These evil cartoonish puppets always serve as a distraction.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Jul 6, 2017 - 10:00am PT
Nothing about this is a 'diversion' and life doesn't always fit nicely into the conspiracy of the moment. I know dear leader is actually a third generation CIA plant and we're about to run a false flag war killing about a 100k people so walmart can keep their employees on food stamps. Got it...
dirtbag

climber
Jul 6, 2017 - 10:43am PT
It's always enlightening to hear from the tin foil hat/Alex Jones/trump crowd.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jul 6, 2017 - 11:36am PT
You need to understand that these regimes present a story about helping people.
So they can't just kill a person for violation of a phone calls rule.
This person need to commit "real" offense like helping defectors or sharing sensitive defence information or spreading lies about "beautiful Korean life".


What rock have you been hiding under? They can and will kill a person, just because they are related to Un. They don't even need to be in the country. Making up a story afterwards is the job of the propaganda dept, and is NOT a requirement prior to execution.
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Jul 6, 2017 - 11:37am PT
Boogeymen are used by every government... without them you'd quickly realize the people on the other side of the imaginary lines on a map are pretty much just like you.

Or do you believe these boogeymen, who now magically have unfettered access to the internet and media(on an isolated small peninsula), are simply too wily to kill or neuter? They also magically acquire the materials and means to produce longer range missles...

China gets a buffer and simply has to care and feed the fat little crazy man enough to keep him alive. Perfect theater.



zBrown

Ice climber
Jul 6, 2017 - 05:07pm PT
What's going on in Pakistan and India?

MikeL

Social climber
Southern Arizona
Jul 6, 2017 - 05:59pm PT
Healyje: Unfortunately, they don't need to be accurate or precise.

I’m sorry, I thought that I had made that implication. Thanks for clearing it up for readers. It should give them a insight into the kind of aggression that NK would be undertaking, although I doubt it would lead to a decades long period of “dark ages” in South Korea. It don’t believe it did in Japan or in Germany when parts of their countries were decimated from WWII. It would certainly make history.
Hubbard

climber
San Diego
Jul 6, 2017 - 06:11pm PT
India is our proper geopolitical partner. In the 1960's India got mad at us for sailing a nuclear carrier in the Indian Ocean: their pond. India has a good Navy. They have been nursing that bitter ever since. We sided with Pakistan partly because Pakistan's terrain offers a better spying corridor into Russia and to counter Russia's ill advised move into Afghanistan in the 1980's and more recently to help on the Afghanistan problem that we now have. However, with things heating up over Chinese issues for both the US and India, the Indians have decided to get over the carrier incident and start working together. Good move. Hindu majority India is at least a functioning Democracy. The caste system is the shitty leg but otherwise they are closer to American ideals than Pakistan who as a Muslim nation oppresses the women: half the population. They are not the future. The one war between India and China ended with India getting stuffed. The Indians have not forgotten. China is now working with Pakistan on the silk road project and giving both the Indians and the US a cold shoulder. The Chinese annex of Tibet is no small matter but it is done and the Chinese are moving forward. At some point countries like India have to push back or lose. This will manifest in Kashmir and the Bhutan zone. Deep breath. Think it over. You are the president: What would you do?
okie

Trad climber
Jul 6, 2017 - 07:08pm PT
MikeL, my Dad was an artillery guy there in the fifties. Hard to believe this sh#t is still going on. I had to come by all my outdoor skills on my own because after Korea my Dad never wanted to camp out again in his life.
Studly

Trad climber
WA
Jul 6, 2017 - 07:15pm PT
An estimated 3 million Koreans and a million Chinese died in the last Korean War, mostly due to our carpet bombing and razing the country. We lost about 36,000 men.
But some folks think its time to do it all over again, but this time with nuclear weapons and ICBMs involved.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Jul 6, 2017 - 09:42pm PT
An estimated 3 million Koreans and a million Chinese died in the last Korean War, mostly due to our carpet bombing and razing the country. We lost about 36,000 men

Including my uncle.
Hubbard

climber
San Diego
Jul 6, 2017 - 11:29pm PT
One other solution is South Korea could just surrender and go Communist and hope for the best. We simply walk away and sail home. Nobody gets hurt. Vietnam fell to that. How are they now? They would be the model. They seem OK. If the Koreans chose this, the North would still be there with more money and increased confidence. Korea in that form would possibly want revenge on Japan. China probably wants that. Does Japan just give it up too? They are the third biggest economy in the world. Where do you draw the line? When countries like NK have political leaders who openly state they want to blow you up and wipe you away and spend all their money building weapons to do just that, it is OK to consider a response. The North Koreans don't have to say these things . NK could give it up. Why don't they just surrender to the West. Kim loves basketball. Where is the balance?
A potential strategy could be to evacuate Northern South Korea then launch a smaller war now rather than fight a bigger one later after the North has perfected their nuclear attack skills. Drive to the capital of the North: Pyongyang and stop there. China and Russia would probably just watch nervously like we did when China took Tibet and Russia claimed Crimea. The risk is Kim would use a nuclear weapon in theater. If he did it would be there in Korea. It seems like he would. If he doesn't then he loses a conventional war.
The new North Korea can be smaller and disarmed. The buffer for China could still be there and Seoul is not living under such a threat by the North.
The other choice is status quo. Keep kicking the can. This is the most likely. I am not advocating any particular avenue. I don't know the answers and nobody else does either. It comes down to political leaders making choices and with Trump driving our boat I am as nervous as everybody else. I am all ears as to what you people think out there.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jul 7, 2017 - 06:29am PT
The risk is Kim would use a nuclear weapon in theater.

No risk there. Every possible launch site is already redundantly targeted and his POS missiles aren't exactly rapid-fire. Any sign of pre-launch activity and the cruise missiles will rain.
dirtbag

climber
Jul 7, 2017 - 06:46am PT
Everything I've read says just the opposite: the nukes are mobile and therefore, difficult to target.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Jul 7, 2017 - 07:12am PT
Why doesn't South Korea send in their own "Seal Team 6" to take him out? I don't think it would that hard to infiltrate his inner circle, if you are Korean.
zBrown

Ice climber
Jul 7, 2017 - 09:27am PT
Speaking of Dennis "The Worm" Rodman.

Sick stuff

Trump to Putin: 'It's an honor to be with you'
dirtbag

climber
Jul 7, 2017 - 09:29am PT
^^^Yep.
MikeL

Social climber
Southern Arizona
Jul 7, 2017 - 11:48am PT
Okie,

I couldn’t help but laugh out loud when I read your post. I understand.

I’ve lived in Canada, Minnesota, and Wisconsin for maybe 10-15 years, but I’ve never been as cold as I was in Korea. When I was there, there were no trees from the DMZ to Seoul. The winters were brutal. So were the battles, I hear, during the war.

As a minor aside, when I first got there as a young 2nd Lt., I noticed that the Turk compounds were barely manned with security personnel (south Koreans who would walk the fences and man the entry check points). The “slickee boys” were south Koreans who would steal into compounds and steal anything and everything. We were there to fight (ha-ha), so the U.S. used Korean contractors for security. I was told that the Turks made it clear that they wouldn’t put up with thieves. They caught one and hung him and let him rot like that for a week for all to see.

Well!! After that their barbed wire fence consisted of one strand of barbed wire.
Hubbard

climber
San Diego
Jul 7, 2017 - 01:12pm PT

Reilly, I'm thinking they would just have a nuclear bomb in a basement in the capital waiting for the occupying force to settle in. Then a couple suicide technicians could detonate the rig.
10b, that is a bummer about your uncle. All this stuff is tough. Most people don't want to think about any of it. It is real though.
I think our role as super topo arm chair posters is to hash it out no hard feelings. Maybe an original idea will appear.
TwistedCrank

climber
Released into general population, Idaho
Jul 7, 2017 - 02:23pm PT
Trump got owned.
Gearhead

Trad climber
Novato Ca
Jul 8, 2017 - 09:18pm PT
I was stationed on the DMZ for a year with the 2nd Infantry Div. It was pretty much understood that if N.Korea invaded that the would roll to Seoul before they would run out Fuel and logistics. That was if we didn't respond with nukes mind you. At the time we had artillery launched tactical nukes on our base as well as others. I always wondered if the could launch those things far enough away. Basically our war plan was a series of fight and retreat moves until the 25th and 7th ID got there. Horrible place to fight a ground war. Lot of death if we go to war there.
drF

Trad climber
usa
Jul 9, 2017 - 09:05am PT
Speaking of Dennis "The Worm" Rodman.

Sick stuff

Trump to Putin: 'It's an honor to be with you'

He's a great progressive that wiley worm!
trailridge127

Trad climber
Loveland, CO
Aug 10, 2017 - 06:31am PT
Despite the constant bluffing from North Korea in the past, I am very concerned about what will happen in the next month. I believe even if they test one more missile or nuclear bomb. Military action will happen.

This has been a diplomatic and military failure on the US for 20 years. If we were not consumed with the middle east, potentially things would have been different. I cannot fathom the death if the full blown war breaks out.

The war tension is high. Honesty, it may be an exaggeration, but society may never be same.

In reading about the large scale death that took place in World War 2. I cannot fathom the strength of the soldiers that took those memories with them.

With North and South Korea we will see it first hand via social media, news and potentially in our own backyard with their missiles.

In my opinion the war drums are beating.

crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Aug 10, 2017 - 06:40am PT
North Korea made its nuclear break out under George W. Bush, not under Bill Clinton or Barack Obama.

We are on the brink of war, yes. An infantile, bombastic, crazy leader threatens the world. To make matters worse, Kim Jong-un is just as crazy.
trailridge127

Trad climber
Loveland, CO
Aug 10, 2017 - 07:13am PT
Bill indeed did strike a peace deal with the North Koreans, but his deal may have been foolish and the real North Korean intentions may have been concealed and they were starving at the time. Who Knows it doesn't really matter now. My point was that this is a problem that has been an issue no one has wanted to deal with.

In all candidness, do you think the options with dealing with North Korea would be any different with Hillary as President?

The North Koreans have clearly stated they are not willing to "budge an inch" on their nuclear program. Nor, in my opinion, will any American President(democrat or republican) accept having North Korea with nuclear capability that can directly reach the mainland US.

We accepted many other nuclear powers such as China and India Pakistan. But we also fought a devastating war that ended with a seize fire, which is very open ending.

I am sure the North Koreans hold the US directly to blame for their economic failures. Meaning they have a massive grudge and certainly already have justified dropping a nuclear bomb on us. So, the situation is certainly different than China or others
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Aug 10, 2017 - 07:15am PT
...ended with a seize fire...


cease fire.

-Rage, rage against auto-correct.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 10, 2017 - 12:49pm PT
I was just listening to the Defense Correspondent for the publication called The Nation on the radio. His view is that North Korea is developing their nuclear capability not for offensive purposes, but rather as a deterrent against an attack by the U.S. But I think he misses the point. The U.S. would have no interest in attacking North Korea if they weren't about to become a nuclear power, unless of course they were to attack the south.

So, knowing that they would be completely safe from a U.S. attack if they drop their nuclear program and refrain from attacking South Korea, why do they feel the need for a deterrent?

I can only see one answer to that question. The deterrent is intended to hold us at bay when they invade the south. So I agree with the correspondent that the nukes are meant to be a deterrent, but there is only one situation where that deterrent has any meaning.

To those who call for diplomacy I would point out that eleven Presidents have struggled to find a diplomatic solution to the North Korean problem. Time and again North Korea has feigned cooperation and instead engaged in lies and deceit. Today they are on the threshold of accomplishing their decades old goal.

It would be a dangerous play, but diplomacy at the point of a gun with China might be the best choice. If China is 100% certain that we will act before Kim Jung-Un has his nukes in place, if they know with certainty that we are not drawing a rhetorical line in the sand, they ought to realize that the next move is theirs, that the days of playing NK as a thorn in our side are over. Like most of us, I recoil at the thought of military action in North Korea. But what will the cost be in the future of inaction today?
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 10, 2017 - 12:55pm PT
Kicking the can down the road is not diplomacy, unless yer Neville Chamberlain. Russia needs to be brought into this mix too. They also supply NK with a lot of oil. I don't see Putin cooperating but I hope Xi will.
G_Gnome

Trad climber
Cali
Aug 10, 2017 - 02:08pm PT
Just abandon all the debt owed to foreign countries/corporations. Sure, the dollar would suck for a few years but after that everything would be better.
jaaan

Trad climber
Chamonix, France
Aug 10, 2017 - 02:10pm PT
In all candidness, do you think the options with dealing with North Korea would be any different with Hillary as President?

I don't think she'd have provoked KJU as much as Trump and probably would have listened to her advisers - instead of sending infantile tweets out to the world every day, which they (Tillerson and co) then have to try and explain away and cover up for him. And through diplomacy - instead of throwing her weight around all over the world - maybe she'd have had more of that world on her side to put pressure on the idiot (the other idiot).

I said to someone a few months ago that I wondered if we are seeing the last few weeks of peace that the world will ever know. Now I'm REALLY thinking that.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Aug 10, 2017 - 02:14pm PT
...but his deal may have been foolish...

The N. Koreans are just like the Israelis - they'll say anything, but they're not swerving an iota from their basic progrom for anyone.
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Aug 10, 2017 - 02:25pm PT
why do they feel the need for a deterrent?

Kris, you should ask the Vietnamese, the Dominicans, the Granadans, the Libyans, and the Iraqis if they feel a nation needs a deterrent against invasions by the USA.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 10, 2017 - 02:35pm PT
The N. Koreans are just like the Israelis...

Good grief.

If Israel were to lay down her arms what would happen? She would be overrun and destroyed by her neighbors. But if Israel's neighbors were to lay down their arms? Peace, trade, and prosperity.

What if North Korea were to lay down her arms? But how about South Korea?

The North Koreans are just like the Iranians... That's more like it, yes?

So no one here thinks that NK has been planning to finish the Korean War since the armistice was signed in 1953?
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Aug 10, 2017 - 02:52pm PT
But if Israel's neighbors were to lay down their arms? Peace, trade, and prosperity.

Lol... come on now. Israel is likely one of the most evil governments on the planet. I make a clear distinction between the ruling class and normal Jewish people.

Until we dig the whole rotten country up, rock by rock, and move it to Baja, there will never be peace.
dirtbag

climber
Aug 10, 2017 - 02:52pm PT
It's most likely not a solvable problem.

It sucks but china will only go so far, military action would be a disaster, North Korea probably won't give up their regime survival insurance, and since we've been waiting out the regime's impending collapse for 65 or so years now, they aren't going anywhere.

They aren't going to invade the south, either. That would be suicidal, and the regime doesn't seem sucidal.


So we are stuck.

Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 10, 2017 - 04:06pm PT
They aren't going to invade the south, either. That would be suicidal, and the regime doesn't seem sucidal.

Of course I hope you're right about that. But then why the nukes, when they know that simply standing down will lead to a lifting of the harsh economic sanctions as well as their safety?

dirtbag

climber
Aug 10, 2017 - 04:25pm PT
From their perspective--how can they be so sure good things will happen by abandoning the nuclear program?

Ghadaffi gave up his program--what did the US do to him?

That's an over simplification, of course. But that might be how they see the world.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 10, 2017 - 05:02pm PT
Gaddafi was killed in a revolution by his own people. And he spent a good part of his life sponsoring international terrorism. Downing the 747 over Lockerbie Scotland should find him a special place in hell. Reap what you sow.

dirtbag

climber
Aug 10, 2017 - 05:09pm PT
I agree.

But I'm not the leader of an insular paranoid extremely autocratic regime, either.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 10, 2017 - 05:15pm PT
military action would be a disaster

For N Korea and, to a lesser degree, S Korea. I only hope we honor the
Asian way of war, best evinced by Genghis, and reduce them to a smoking
hand-to-mouth subsistence level in perpetuity. This insane practice of
restoring our defeated enemies to a state of luxury has to stop. Heads
on pikes surrounding the smouldering wreckage is the only sure way to
ensure peace.
c wilmot

climber
Aug 10, 2017 - 05:19pm PT
If you want to understand why North Korea refuses to work with the US then look no further than our history with iran
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Aug 10, 2017 - 05:20pm PT
China will never allow a unified Korean Peninsula allied to the US, under any circumstances. If Trump had any functioning brain cells he would negotiate a regime change with China and be done with it.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 10, 2017 - 05:35pm PT
China will never allow a unified Korean Peninsula allied to the US, under any circumstances. If Trump had any functioning brain cells he would negotiate a regime change with China and be done with it.

Umm. I think we've been pushing on China to instigate a "regime change" since Kim Jung-Il was the Glorious Leader. That is the obvious solution, at least for now and depending on who ends up with the reigns of power. China has done nothing, and won't so long as the cost of playing NK as a thorn in our side and a distraction from her takeover of the Asian pacific, remains affordable.

Where is the evidence that we want a unified Korea? Even Truman was smart enough to avoid that debacle, at the cost of McArthur's career.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Aug 10, 2017 - 05:39pm PT
For N Korea and, to a lesser degree, S Korea. I only hope we honor the
Asian way of war, best evinced by Genghis, and reduce them to a smoking
hand-to-mouth subsistence level in perpetuity. This insane practice of
restoring our defeated enemies to a state of luxury has to stop. Heads
on pikes surrounding the smouldering wreckage is the only sure way to
ensure peace.



I don't know about that Reilly..... the Germans and the Japanese are now some of our best friends.....

We left Germany smoking and in total defeat after WW1....and let the English and the French kick em when they were down.... and we got Hitler.

And in Iraq.... after Sadams statue got toppled, we dismantled their military.... tossing a ton of men out of work... who were desperate, and desperate men can do bad things... like form ISIS.

I think a good ass kicking of the Military/Leaders/bad guys should come first......then we rebuild and help the survivors.

As I have said.... this is China's problem- NK is the state they support and keep alive. Only they have the power to end this thing with out nuclear war possibly breaking out.



10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Aug 10, 2017 - 05:45pm PT
If you want to understand why North Korea refuses to work with the US then look no further than our history with iran

I actually agree with your statement.

China will never allow a unified Korean Peninsula allied to the US, under any circumstances. If Trump had any functioning brain cells he would negotiate a regime change with China and be done with it.

Why should they? If the shoe was on the other foot, and China occupied territory on our border, the US government would not like it much, but as you say, trump doesn't understand, let alone know, history.

I would not be surprised to hear that Kim comes down with an uncurable Chinese "disease"
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Aug 10, 2017 - 06:22pm PT
Why would we want a war with China, or vice versa? We are way too interdependent.
Rudbud

Gym climber
Marathon, FL
Aug 10, 2017 - 06:23pm PT
Who do you think has a bigger dick?
Donald or Kim?
My guess is Kim...
dirtbag

climber
Aug 10, 2017 - 07:48pm PT
This seems like the least bad idea:


We started a preventative war a mere 14 years ago because we caved into fear.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 10, 2017 - 08:17pm PT
the Germans and the Japanese are now some of our best friends.....

Guy, be careful what you wish for, although I do prefer an M3 to a 370.
WBraun

climber
Aug 10, 2017 - 08:29pm PT
This is how it went down.

CIA sent Rodman to tell Kim wrong un to keep lobbing missiles to scare the sh!t out of people so that we Americans can spend more money on our defense contractors.

More defense contractors making money boosts the economy driving down the unemployment rate making the illusion America is great again.

The horsesh!t scare tactics by North Korea always work because Americans are so damn stupid they'll believe anything they're fed by their moron mainstream media.

All the Russian horsesh!t is the same cesspool of garbage also that the dumb asz Americans fall for.

Americans are so stoopid .....

stunewberry

Trad climber
Spokane, WA
Aug 10, 2017 - 08:29pm PT
This from Thomas Friedman of the NY Times:

(https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/10/opinion/trump-north-korea-strategy.html);

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson says Americans who are concerned about the situation in North Korea “should sleep well at night.” Of course! Donald Trump and the North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un — neither of whom has any aides who can stand up to them — are trading fire and brimstone threats with their fingers cocked on nuclear weapons. What could possibly keep a person up at night? Surely Tillerson jests or is high on Ambien.

Have we already become so inured to the madness of the Trump administration that we have simply forgotten over these six months what it would be like if America had a real president to manage this crisis — not the historically ignorant, erratic, petulant boy king we’re stuck with?

A serious president wouldn’t be leveling unscripted threats at North Korea — uncoordinated with his secretaries of state and defense and unconnected to any larger strategy — or sanction a few no-account Chinese entities, desperately seek negotiations on terms sure to fail and threaten a war that would be catastrophic politically, militarily and morally.

A serious president would seize the diplomatic initiative with a strategy that serves our interests, protects our stakes in the Asia-Pacific theater, solidifies and keeps faith with our allies, doesn’t harm American-Chinese relations but also doesn’t discard 70 years of post-World War II American leadership in that region waiting for China to rescue us.

A serious president would follow the rough outline laid out by one of America’s most seasoned Asia-China hands, Jeffrey Bader, which is summarized in a smart paper on Brookings.edu titled “Why Deterring and Containing North Korea Is Our Least Bad Option.”

Bader, who has served multiple administrations in diplomatic and policy jobs related to China and is now a private consultant, begins by asking the best question any American strategist could ask when thinking about how to deter a nuclear-armed foe: What would George Kennan do?

Kennan was the architect of America’s successful containment of the Soviet Union, which had tens of thousands of nuclear missiles aimed at us for roughly half a century.

Kennan, argues Bader, would grasp that “while some situations may be unacceptable, they do not lend themselves to short-term fixes. The North Korean challenge is one of them.”

As Kennan understood with the Soviet Union, added Bader, when faced “with a foe against whom we could not reasonably afford to contemplate an offensive war aimed at regime change — and who viewed its survival as dependent on hostility to the United States,” the only rational approach is patient “containment, deterrence and pressure.” That is especially true when you recognize that America is vastly stronger than North Korea and the winds of history are all on our side.

Is North Korea different from the Soviet Union? Of course. Is anyone comfortable with the fact that North Korea is building nuclear-tipped missiles that can hit the United States? Of course not. But the point is: We’ve lived with such threats before, and there is simply no reason to believe that the deterrent capabilities we’ve had in place to prevent North Korea from attacking South Korea and American forces there since the end of the Korean War will not continue to work. North Korea’s ruling Kim family is homicidal, but it has not survived for three generations by being suicidal. And firing a nuclear missile at us would be suicide.

What we should be doing is actually laughing at their missile tests — telling them we think they’re pathetic — while maintaining our deterrence, steadily improving and deploying our antiballistic missile capabilities to defend the United States homeland, as well as American forces in the region and our Japanese and South Korean allies. We should also bombard North Korea’s people with information on how poor they are compared with the rest of the world — while generating ever tighter economic sanctions and embargoes so the North Korean regime sees that its choice is very simple: It can have either nuclear weapons or endless poverty that will eventually sap its strength from within.

I repeat, time is on our side. As Bader notes, North Korea is “a foe with one strength and many profound and eventually fatal weaknesses.” Let’s treat it that way: Deter its strength and exacerbate its weaknesses by being smart, not hysterical.

How? The best place to start is by putting on the table a clear, formal peace proposal so the world — especially South Korea and China — see that America is not the problem. The more the whole world sees us as the solution and not as a country led by someone just as crazy, irrational and unstable as North Korea, the more leverage we will have.

What should the American proposal say? It should tell the North Koreans, says Bader, that in return for their complete denuclearization and dismantling of their missile program, we would establish full diplomatic relations; end the economic embargo and sanctions; and provide economic assistance, investment and a peace treaty to replace the 64-year-old armistice agreement. “Each side could commit to those objectives at the outset, with the timeline and key implementing framework to be negotiated,” he added. “There would be nothing in such an agreement that would be contrary to U.S. national security interests, and it would provide to North Korea the security that it claims justifies its nuclear weapons programs.”

It’s called the art of the deal.

It is most unlikely that North Korea would accept such a proposal. Its leader is obsessed, at least for now, with protecting his regime with nuclear missiles. But this overture, Bader notes, would “demonstrate to the South Korean government, and to its president, Moon Jae-in, that Washington is prepared to put an attractive offer on the table, since Moon is seeking avenues for reconciliation with the North. Moon could be given a leading role in trying to persuade Pyongyang to accept such a proposal. If Pyongyang refuses, as is likely, Moon will be more likely to support a serious containment and deterrence strategy.”

Such a proposal would give the initiative to us, rather than us waiting for China to rescue us with pressure on Pyongyang that never comes. Indeed, it would give the Trump administration the moral high ground with everyone, which will help to keep the Chinese and Russians behind sanctions and containment and deprive them of excuses that the North’s drive for nuclear weapons is the natural response to “threats” from the United States.

We didn’t get into this North Korea problem the short way, and we are not going to get out of it the short way. But the least bad option now is to gear up for a long game that contains, deters and isolates a nuclear-armed North Korea — by getting China, Russia, South Korea and Japan to see that America is ready to make peace with North Korea’s regime if it will abandon its nuclear weapons — and to keep that game going until the North either relents or cracks.

The more we freak out about North Korea’s nuclear capabilities, the more leverage it has. Instead we should be telling Kim Jong-un: “Hey, pal, not impressed with your nuclear toys, been there, done that with the Soviet Union. Time is on our side — and now the whole world is asking why you won’t accept our credible peace proposal. So have fun with your firecrackers! Don’t even think about lobbing one near us, or we might just shut off all the lights in your pathetic failing state. We can do that — just like we can make your rockets blow up or go off course. Have you noticed? And when your people get tired of eating potatoes every night, give us a call: 202-456-1414. Ask for Donald.”"
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Aug 10, 2017 - 08:33pm PT

Aug 10, 2017 - 08:29pm PT
This is how it went down.

CIA sent Rodman to tell Kim wrong un to keep lobbing missiles to scare the sh!t out of people so that we Americans can spend more money on our defense contractors.

More defense contractors making money boosts the economy driving down the unemployment rate making the illusion America is great again.

The horsesh!t scare tactics by North Korea always work because Americans are so damn stupid they'll believe anything they're fed by their moron mainstream media.

All the Russian horsesh!t is the same cesspool of garbage also that the dumb asz Americans fall for.

Americans are so stoopid .....

You have a point.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Aug 10, 2017 - 08:37pm PT
For N Korea and, to a lesser degree, S Korea. I only hope we honor the
Asian way of war, best evinced by Genghis, and reduce them to a smoking
hand-to-mouth subsistence level in perpetuity. This insane practice of
restoring our defeated enemies to a state of luxury has to stop. Heads
on pikes surrounding the smouldering wreckage is the only sure way to
ensure peace.

Come on Reilly, that's easy to say until it happens to you.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Aug 10, 2017 - 08:47pm PT
Thanks for the excellent article, stunewberry. Hmmm..., listen to Thomas Friedman, a foreign affairs scholar or Donald Trump, the carnival barker?

The "reduce them to ashes" hyperbole is no nonsense.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 10, 2017 - 09:28pm PT
10b, it ain't gonna happen to me. One thing I learned from Vinny - don't
let yer emotions get the better of you, it's just business.
Bushman

climber
The state of quantum flux
Aug 11, 2017 - 08:30am PT
Down with Drunken War Songs

Beware the self righteous self proclaimed patriots
Who posture as true Americans and wrap themselves in the flag
While calling out their neighbors as would be cowards
In their bitterness at being never-was-beens
These tortured souls teach warrior-speak to the young minds
Having grown up under the wing of some disgruntled veteran
Or over-fueled their thoughts with right wing talk-radio stupidity
Then passed on the virus vitriol of hate to the impressionable

Make up your own minds little darlings
Glean your knowledge through diverse observations
Line your pockets with gentle words
Soft-spoken by un-proclaimed patriots
Those people who are over looked but rarely do complain about it

-bushman
08/11/2017
ydpl8s

Trad climber
Santa Monica, California
Aug 11, 2017 - 08:46am PT
^^^^^^^^

A tome well worth listening to, thanks Bushman!

I was stationed in S. Korea for 16 mnths from late 74 to early 76 (we had 44,000 troops in country at that time). We had an incident where (searching my memory) a N Korean guard at the DMZ beat a US(?) soldier to death with a bat. We were on high alert for almost a month. They told us then that if the "balloon went up", the units stationed near the border were estimated 70 to 80 percent loss in the 1st 24 hours. Luckily, I was stationed on a mountain top about 35 mi. N. of Pusan.

dirtbag

climber
Aug 11, 2017 - 10:27am PT
The most pressing question about North Korea has always been, why do their dear leaders have such f*#ked up hair cuts?
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Aug 11, 2017 - 11:10am PT
The North Koreans won't back down, can't be pressured into backing down, and it'd be hard to destabilize their regime.

No it wouldn't. China could turn the cash and weapons spigot off at any time. NK could be completely isolated and cutoff within a few weeks.

China doesn't want to, they like their mad-dog buffer. He's relatively cheap to feed and keeps the US flushing more $$$ down the drain every second. He serves as a delicious distraction.

Ignore the strange little fat man, he's nothing more than a curious prop, just like our orange clown prop.

Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Aug 11, 2017 - 11:45am PT
The most pressing question about North Korea has always been, why do their dear leaders have such f*#ked up hair cuts?

True about the haircuts, but the military has the best hats EVER!

fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Aug 11, 2017 - 12:00pm PT
Maybe they double as airbags.

Or more likely, body-bags for those unfortunate enough to displease Dr. No.....

zipper around the underside of the brim, pull down the fabric, drawstring at the end.

Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 11, 2017 - 12:07pm PT
Meanwhile back at the ranch...


Domination of the Asian Pacific is no small matter to China. Crisis on the Korean Peninsula plays to their advantage. Lengthy wars, questionable spending decisions, and serious maintenance gaps in key weapons systems have limited our ability to project power. Sucking us into a quagmire in Korea - even to the point of limited military engagement - could well be the Chinese policy.
frank wyman

Mountain climber
montana
Aug 11, 2017 - 12:39pm PT
If we go to war with North Korea,Maybe they can bring back M.A.S.H...Call it M.A.S.H.2017. Bring back the old gang for another tour...
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 11, 2017 - 12:48pm PT
I remember going to the original movie as a teenager with an uncle who fought in Korea. He lasted about a half hour before we had to exit.

The same thing happened to my dad when we went to see Saving Private Ryan. Shook him up pretty bad.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Aug 11, 2017 - 01:20pm PT
So I heard an "expert" say that we have coverts on the ground in NK. They are not necessarily Americans. The Chinese probably have coverts on the ground there too.
I am pretty sure that we could bribe some of Kim's inner circle to take him out. Pay them $1 billion. That's trump change to some people.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 11, 2017 - 01:29pm PT
Regime change isn't necessarily for the better, although hard to see it getting any worse.
OK, go ahead on it.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Aug 11, 2017 - 01:34pm PT
Yeah, we need regime change. Then the new POTUS can start dealing seriously with the North Korea problem.
DanaB

climber
CT
Aug 11, 2017 - 01:48pm PT
Must be nerve-wracking being high in the power structure in North Korea. I'm sure he only trusts people who are very close to him . . . and then he begins to distrust them because they are too close.

And it seems as if wars start because of blundering, wishful thinking, and momentum. I don't remember who said it but " . . .the delusion that a war will be swift and decisive is a persistent one."
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Aug 11, 2017 - 01:54pm PT
DanaB.....insert USA for Korea and your post retains it's relevancy. Two clowns on the world stage blustering at one another.
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Aug 11, 2017 - 02:54pm PT
Regime change isn't necessarily for the better, although hard to see it getting any worse.
OK, go ahead on it.
WyoRockMan

climber
Grizzlyville, WY
Aug 11, 2017 - 03:26pm PT
A classic synopsis, still relevant.

[Click to View YouTube Video]
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Aug 11, 2017 - 03:42pm PT
Kicking the can down the road is not diplomacy

It is the best of diplomacy.

The Friedman article is brilliant, and gives a clear way forward.

"Kicking the can down the road", the favorite strategy of Saint Ronald Reagan, seemed to work pretty well with the Soviets. Of course, Reilly, you know more about all this than Reagan did.

And this strategy is not new, but ancient, from the sufi story:

One day, while Nasreddin was visiting the capital city, the Sultan took offense to a joke that was made at his expense. He had Nasreddin immediately arrested and imprisoned; accusing him of heresy and sedition. Nasreddin apologized to the Sultan for his joke, and begged for his life; but the Sultan remained obstinate, and in his anger, sentenced Nasreddin to be beheaded the following day. When Nasreddin was brought out the next morning, he addressed the Sultan, saying "Oh Sultan, live forever! You know me to be a skilled teacher, the greatest in your kingdom. If you will but delay my sentence for one year, I will teach your favorite horse to sing."

The Sultan did not believe that such a thing was possible; but his anger had cooled, and he was amused by the audacity of Nasreddin's claim. "Very well," replied the Sultan, "you will have a year. But if by the end of that year you have not taught my favorite horse to sing, then you will wish you had been beheaded today."

That evening, Nasreddin's friends were allowed to visit him in prison, and found him in unexpected good spirits. "How can you be so happy?" they asked. "Do you really believe that you can teach the Sultan's horse to sing?" "Of course not," replied Nasreddin, "but I now have a year which I did not have yesterday; and much can happen in that time. The Sultan may come to repent of his anger, and release me. He may die in battle or of illness, and it is traditional for a successor to pardon all prisoners upon taking office. He may be overthrown by another faction, and again, it is traditional for prisoners to be released at such a time. Or the horse may die, in which case the Sultan will be obliged to release me."

"Finally," said Nasreddin, "even if none of those things come to pass, perhaps the horse can sing."

it is better for educated, civilized humans to make their way using their brains, rather than their muscles.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 11, 2017 - 04:11pm PT
I love Nasruddin! I even have one of his books! And nothing says trenchant analysis like glib blathering!
You got a poster of Neville Chamberlain on yer wall?
dirtbag

climber
Aug 11, 2017 - 04:38pm PT
Meh, folks opposed to the Iraq War were also compared to chamberlain. Those making the comparison were wrong, too.

We didn't bomb the ussr, either, and they had lotsa nukes pointed at us, but I hardly think that Truman, Ike, Kennedy, lbj, Nixon would be called appeasers, either.


Edit: meanwhile, military action in Venezuela is now on the table:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/08/11/trump-wont-rule-out-a-military-option-in-venezuela/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_trumpvenezuela-715pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.d251d4d91c28


Have a nice weekend, everyone.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Aug 11, 2017 - 05:30pm PT
Regime change isn't necessarily for the better,

Agreed, I mean look what happened to Iraq after we got rid of Saddam. Libya, after Gaddafi was gone.
Say what you will about those two, but there wasn't a lot of instability in those countries under their dictatorships.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 11, 2017 - 07:51pm PT
Iraq didn't go bad because we toppled Saddam. It went bad largely because we didn't employ his military. If we had called in everyone in his military below the rank of Colonel and said here's your paycheck, we have a country to get on it's feet, things would be different. But our people running the show were incompetent and had no imagination. So we made destitutes out of a trained force who would have joined us in a quick minute. That was the beginning of the end.

Concerning Qaddafi, you reap what you sow.
Fritz

Social climber
Choss Creek, ID
Aug 11, 2017 - 08:31pm PT
I enjoyed a 4 hour drive home from a northern Nevada mineral hunting adventure this afternoon listening to Fox News & CNN.

Much of it was about Korea.

What I found significant is: official Chinese media today wrote that if North Korea attacked the U.S., China would stay neutral (which is earth-shaking news). However if the U.S. attacked North Korea, China would be allied with North Korea, which has been the norm since 1951.

That first statement is a huge victory for the U.S. & may well defuse the current blow-up, since North Korea needs China as a ally to survive a U.S. attack.

Sigh.

Late afternoon on Fox, the right-wing pundits were all for a "pre-emptive" strike on North Korea & of course they did not mention China as a factor in the world war, which would likely follow a U.S. inititated war on North Korea.

Sigh.

I hope Trump is sane enough to not attack North Korea, unless they attack us or our friends first.

Sigh.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Aug 11, 2017 - 08:57pm PT
What I found significant is: official Chinese media today wrote that if North Korea attacked the U.S., China would stay neutral (which is earth-shaking news). However if the U.S. attacked North Korea, China would be allied with North Korea, which has been the norm since 1951.

And who would Putin back?
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 11, 2017 - 08:59pm PT
Check if they're moving the USS Maddox to a station anywhere near Guam.

I can't recall his name, probably shouldn't post it if I could, but I met the radio operator on the Maddox during the Gulf of Tonkin incident at a campfire at josh. When I realized I was talking to the genuine article I was stunned. He said the "spooks" took over his radio room and locked it down for the duration of the night. Spooks of course meaning CIA.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 11, 2017 - 09:02pm PT
And who would Putin back?

The Soviet's, now Russian's, wet dream for decades has been a conflict between US and China. On one occasion Andropov tried to start it, but Kissinger wouldn't be fooled.
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Aug 11, 2017 - 09:14pm PT
I hope Trump is sane enough to not attack North Korea, unless they attack us or our friends first.

The Orange one is quite sane, a common garden variety narcissist for sure, but sane. But it doesn't matter since he's not running the show.

crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Aug 11, 2017 - 09:26pm PT
He's not sane and nobody's running the show.
Fritz

Social climber
Choss Creek, ID
Aug 11, 2017 - 09:41pm PT
sigh

And I am hoping for sanity from the insane Trumpsters.
Fritz

Social climber
Choss Creek, ID
Aug 11, 2017 - 09:47pm PT
CNN had Leon Paneta on late today.

I don't remember all his qualifications, but he was Sec. of Defense, head of the CIA, & has various other national posts of prestige.

He thought the current North Korea crisis was the worst crises the U.S. has suffered since the early 1960's Cuban missle crisis.

From a statesman like him, that is scary news.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 11, 2017 - 10:20pm PT
He thought the current North Korea crisis was the worst crises the U.S. has suffered since the early 1960's Cuban missile crisis.

Panetta is as slippery as snake snot. During the cold war there were many much more serious crises than the Cuban Missile affair. They just weren't public news.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Aug 11, 2017 - 10:55pm PT
I agree with Panetta, who was also White House Chief of Staff.
(BTW, played beautifully in Zero Dark Thirty)

The difference in this one, is that instead of happening quietly, in the language and style of diplomacy, it is happening as a public hissy-fit, forcing people to have to react to save face. As such, it becomes unpredictable. It becomes the thing where some insignificant thing can happen, and set off a world war.

I love Nasruddin! I even have one of his books! And nothing says trenchant analysis like glib blathering!
You got a poster of Neville Chamberlain on yer wall?

And nothing says stupidity as much as out-of-hand discarding a strategy that has worked for thousands of years. Do you really have to prove a testosterone level???
Majid_S

Mountain climber
Karkoekstan, Former USSR
Aug 11, 2017 - 10:56pm PT
This is all about pulling china in to a war. This is a wrong dog to get in a dogfight


Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 11, 2017 - 11:00pm PT
This is all about pulling china in to a war. This is a wrong dog to get in a dogfight

It seems to me that if anyone is trying to get someone tangled up in a war, it's China who's playing us.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Aug 11, 2017 - 11:01pm PT
For N Korea and, to a lesser degree, S Korea. I only hope we honor the
Asian way of war, best evinced by Genghis, and reduce them to a smoking
hand-to-mouth subsistence level in perpetuity. This insane practice of
restoring our defeated enemies to a state of luxury has to stop. Heads
on pikes surrounding the smouldering wreckage is the only sure way to
ensure peace.

Yep, worked great in WWI.

I prefer what happened after WWII, but then, I'm sane.

You'll notice the Khans no longer rule the world. didn't work for them, either.....
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 11, 2017 - 11:20pm PT
Ken, Reilly's my neighbor. To be honest I'm never entirely sure when he's being serious, but he has a twisted (in the best of all possible ways) sense of humor. Consider the possibility that you've been trolled by an artist...
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Aug 12, 2017 - 08:10am PT
Kris, I'm blushing. Actually I'm just drawing Ken out to bask in his historical perspicuity.

Yep, worked great in WWI.

Pikes weren't in use during WWI, braj!


You'll notice the Khans no longer rule the world. didn't work for them, either.....

Damn! I thought something had changed! Perhaps you didn't notice that the khanates, in their various forms, did last almost 600 years. I guess they musta turned pikes into plowshares, eh?
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Aug 12, 2017 - 10:45am PT
Ken, Reilly's my neighbor. To be honest I'm never entirely sure when he's being serious, but he has a twisted (in the best of all possible ways) sense of humor. Consider the possibility that you've been trolled by an artist...

Of course. But that's why he's such an admirer of Trump, he uses the same style-----When he advocates something that actually has merit, he claims to be a statesman and historian. When he sets off a stinkbomb, that was just a "joke" AFTER he gets called out.
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Aug 12, 2017 - 12:12pm PT
CNN had Leon Paneta on late today.

If you're still watching CNN, for something other than amusement, that's part of the problem......


WBraun

climber
Aug 12, 2017 - 12:48pm PT
Russia crushes their people.

So full of sh!t and stoopid American western brainwashing .....
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 12, 2017 - 01:32pm PT
So for all of us here who seem to see an equivalency between Trump and Kim Jong-un, here’s some nice little insights into fat-boy’s true nature… 340 insights actually, all of them executed since 2011, usually by bizarre and grotesque means. A select list, kind of like a select guide to his special brand of sickness, is here on USA Today.

He seems to have a penchant for killing humans with anti-aircraft guns. But damn, that security official who got tied to a stake and burned alive with a flame thrower must have really pissed him off…

One guy was killed for nodding off in a meeting. Another for disagreeing with Kim’s forestation policy. During Kim's visit to a farm one official attempted to explain why turtles had died, including power failures and lack of water and food. The official was executed "to set an example."

Like Trump or not, he doesn’t hold a candle to Kim Jong-Un in the insanity and barbarism department.

Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 12, 2017 - 02:45pm PT
Moose, you think that Trump is trying to get into a position where he can torture and execute people for trivial (or serious for that matter) transgressions?

Please, both men have issues. But Kim Jong-Un is evil incarnate.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Topic Author's Reply - Aug 12, 2017 - 04:02pm PT
I kind of agree with Moose here... not much difference in personalities, just difference in environment and what they can get away with because of the circumstances created by their predecessors.
Nuglet

Trad climber
Orange Murica!
Aug 12, 2017 - 04:02pm PT
fvck the fascists
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Aug 12, 2017 - 04:11pm PT
Congress and the Supreme Court are the only differences between Trump and Kim.
johntp

Trad climber
socal
Aug 12, 2017 - 04:11pm PT
Please, both men have issues. But Kim Jong-Un is evil incarnate.

Agreed, they are both naccistic, but I don't think Trump is totally insane either. At least he appears to care about the US population, whereas Kim Jung Un could care less about the people of his nation or any other nation. "Let them eat cake" as it were.

Congress and the Supreme Court are the only differences between Trump and Kim.

I don't think that is true as stated above. I'm no Trumpeteer, but at least he appears fairly rational in these types of issues. If not, NK might already be burning.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 12, 2017 - 05:11pm PT
I kind of agree with Moose here... not much difference in personalities, just difference in environment and what they can get away with because of the circumstances created by their predecessors.

Congress and the Supreme Court are the only differences between Trump and Kim.

This idea that Kim Jong-Ul is somehow the equal of Trump is some crazy sh#t. Hogwash. Delusional actually.

Of course, being among climbers, I mean this in the nicest of all possible ways.
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Aug 12, 2017 - 05:37pm PT
Give him time. He is just getting warmed up...Still courting his hate group base I see.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-lawmakers-criticize-trump-response-to-charlottesville/ar-AApVTCu
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Aug 12, 2017 - 06:11pm PT
At least he appears to care about the US population,

Do you really think trump cares about the US population? Please, trump only cares about one thing, trump. If trump cared about the US population he would not be arresting innocent people. He would be proposing affordable healthcare for all Americans. He would be making sure Americans had access to clean water, and provide for clean air. He would be doing what the American people want done, not what his miniscule base wants.
Trump claims he his not a politician, bullsh#t. He is already running for reelection.
How many presidents have run for reelection after six months in office?
Norton

Social climber
Aug 12, 2017 - 06:43pm PT
and he has now been seen hosting a burger and beer party at the White House for all his House Republicans to celebrate their passing a bill that would take away healthcare from 25 million Americans

it is slowly beginning to dawn on people that we have made President a man who is very obviously alarmingly ignorant of how government functions

this is a man who is visibly miserable just being President, always angry, always lashing out at the slightest slight, obsessed with President Obama

a man who just week called the White House a "dump", no doubt because it was not equipped with gold gilded toilets as his properties are

is there any point where you can just flat out admit that you were wrong voting for him?
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 12, 2017 - 06:59pm PT
Goddammit. You guys have put me in the position of defending Donald Trump, of all people. Why must I do it? Because the volume of the hate against this guy has become irrational. You all need a reality check. I mean damn, there are people here who actually believe that Jong-Il and Trump are cut from the same cloth. This is nuts.

If trump cared about the US population he would not be arresting innocent people.

Ummm… He’s arresting innocent people? Please elaborate.

How many presidents have run for re-election after six months in office?

Pretty much every one I can remember. President Obama, for example, never stopped campaigning after he was elected. Don’t get me wrong, raising huge amounts of money and whipping up support is American politics today. But you’re wearing rose colored glasses if you think your question deserves an answer.

He would be proposing affordable healthcare for all Americans. He would be making sure Americans had access to clean water, and provide for clean air. He would be doing what the American people want done, not what his minuscule base wants.

Health care is off topic, but I'd say that it's become fairly obvious that neither Trump or Congress want anything to do with it. Meaning Obamacare remains in place. EPA? Unless you think that every decision they make is a gift from God, take a closer look. We have an un-elected agency with the power to make law and levee punishment. Do you seriously think that Trump wishes for the days of smog alerts and Love Canal because he wants to reel in 40 years of over-reach?

Every time a band of racists makes the news they are Trump’s base. So you say. So a tiny minority of idiots define Trump? We have just come off an administration which was willing to jump feet first into way too many local racially charged events. Ferguson is the most prominent of many, where even the Atty. General showed up and fanned the flames, and was proven wrong. Sometimes a President should stay above the fray, certainly while events are still unfolding. To say that his initial statement means that A: he is a white supremacist and B: that white supremacists are his base is wrong. A president should let the dust settle before weighing in. This is why we have local government and policing, and theoretically a corps of journalist to keep the public informed.
monolith

climber
state of being
Aug 12, 2017 - 07:10pm PT
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/16/us/politics/campaign-over-president-trump-will-hold-a-what-else-campaign-rally.html

Larry M. Noble, the general counsel of the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan group, said he was not aware of any president having held a campaign rally this early in his tenure.

Trump, August 10:

Mitch, get back to work and put Repeal & Replace, Tax Reform & Cuts and a great Infrastructure Bill on my desk for signing. You can do it!
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 12, 2017 - 08:02pm PT
The first two years of a President's term go by in the blink of an eye. What the NYT defines as a campaign event is pointless. A president, as the leader of their party, hits the ground running looking toward the midterm election.

Regarding the latter, it's a bunch of posing. Look at how bold the House was when they knew President Obama wouldn't sign. Now that Trump says he'll sign a bill (any bill he can claim as a victory,) what is Congress doing? Crickets. Why? Because the last thing the Republicans want right now is two years of being off-agenda fighting over the details of how to set up a modern health care system.

Sorry but a couple of news clips don't tell the story.

Nuglet

Trad climber
Orange Murica!
Aug 12, 2017 - 08:45pm PT
One thing was proved by the event of today:

there are still a lot of racist in this country

trumppo does nothing to distance himself from the hate.
Wade Icey

Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
Aug 12, 2017 - 09:12pm PT
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Aug 12, 2017 - 10:12pm PT
Sorry but a couple of news clips don't tell the story.

Kris, they could have posted hundreds. You still wouldn't be convinced.

You *really* don't understand the depths of a real narcissist. They are not all that common, because they are so odious and intolerable.

Trump encourages violence by his supporters, and those he thinks are his supporters. he even offered to cover their legal expenses, remember? He encouraged cops to beat up suspects, and slam their heads into car roofs.

He does not have the unlimited power of Kim. If he did, the bodies would be stacked like cordwood.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Aug 13, 2017 - 11:49am PT
Goddammit. You guys have put me in the position of defending Donald Trump, of all people. Why must I do it? Because the volume of the hate against this guy has become irrational. You all need a reality check. I mean damn, there are people here who actually believe that Jong-Il and Trump are cut from the same cloth. This is nuts.

Kris, they are both liars, they are both narcissists, and they both have questionable financial dealings.



Ummm… He’s arresting innocent people? Please elaborate.

Kris, he is detainng brown people because they are brown. Now the requisite response is that they crossed the border illegally, I grant you that, but trump hires illegals all the time. Why is that ok?


Pretty much every one I can remember. President Obama, for example, never stopped campaigning after he was elected. Don’t get me wrong, raising huge amounts of money and whipping up support is American politics today. But you’re wearing rose colored glasses if you think your question deserves an answer.

umm Kris, you just did answer it.

We have an un-elected agency with the power to make law and levee punishment.

created by a republican president; and we also have other government agencies that can do that, think Treasury dept.

Do you seriously think that Trump wishes for the days of smog alerts and Love Canal because he wants to reel in 40 years of over-reach?

if it benefits him financially, you can be sure he will do it.


that white supremacists are his base is wrong.

did you hear what david duke said?
Bushman

climber
The state of quantum flux
Aug 13, 2017 - 11:50am PT
From My Periscope

Oddly I saw green algae
Growing from the railing
Of the observation deck
In orbit around earth sailing
On the International Space Station
No texts, twitter, or emailing
As I watch from my periscope
With simplicity availing
Way down here on earth
Under airliners contrail-ing
My tootsies remain sore from hiking
While society is failing

The books all sit unread
On shelves within the holds
Of the alt-right millennials
And discussions remain too bold
For the x-generation parents
We so often are told
As baby boomers feign disinterest
And conversations go cold
When greatest generation survivors
On both sides would be so bold
To say two words of criticism
To the progeny of their fold

Lacy angelica
And wild flowers of many hues
Lined the mountain path
As the chopper droned the blues
While I spied through my periscope
The disconcerting news
Of spot-fires on a ridge top
While mother nature paid her dues
Lightning strikes in many places
And people take their queues
From fringe elements among us
In every size of shoes

And there sits the fool on the hill
Besieged from every side
Who'd precipitate world war three
When there's nowhere left to hide
His frontmen and his handlers
Who've sold us out and lied
I see them through my periscope
The view from here is wide
With those big bands on the radio
When last all nations did collide
I wonder what my great uncle thought
At Normandy before he died

-bushman
08/13/2017
clinker

Trad climber
Santa Cruz, California
Aug 13, 2017 - 11:57am PT

For North Korea, a Return to Sender Missile Tech System would be useful as a deterrent.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Aug 13, 2017 - 01:20pm PT
^^^ I like the way you think...

Steve,

You say they are both liars, narcissists, and have questionable financial dealings. I’d say that that’s par for the course for pretty much every head of state. But, between Trump and Jong-Un, only one of them is a ruthless, tyrannical monster who murders anyone he chooses to on a whim. And his inventiveness concerning the means of execution belies the perverse pleasure he takes in it. I see there’s a pretty strong “Trump would if he could… the bodies would be piling up like cordwood…” sentiment out there. I think that sort of conjecture is over the top to say the least.

Anyway, regarding the other stuff, I’d enjoy a level-headed discussion over a beer. I think we’ll find we have a lot more common ground than not. But a forum like this is a difficult place for those sorts of nuanced exchanges of ideas.

Cheers...
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Aug 13, 2017 - 01:27pm PT
"But a forum like this is a difficult place for those sorts of nuanced exchanges of ideas."

I agree with this Kris. We turn up the contrast to make a point, but there are spaces in between.
little Z

Trad climber
un cafetal en Naranjo
Aug 13, 2017 - 07:20pm PT
I'm only glad it's Kim Jong Un we're facing down and not Daenerys Targaryen.
Vlad Pricker

Mountain climber
The cliffs of insanitty
Aug 14, 2017 - 01:17pm PT
Things are cooling down, not because of either of the two madmens' rhetoric, but cooler heads prevail.

I read with amusement the armchair warriors on this thread who espouse things like, "we can waste them in a minute" and such. Probably no doubt, but at what cost, in the long run? And these lot present us with all kinds of scenarios, and some say that the Pentagon has even thought of them. I am sure the generals and admirals have. But will Donald listen? We know Kim won't.

I have zilch military experience. But what I do recognize is that this can be a precarious affair. What the world needs are people who can rein in the trigger (twitter?) happy headcases who can make this a make or break scenario.

You know the two I refer to.

This will all blow over. Hopefully not in a BOOM!
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Aug 14, 2017 - 01:34pm PT
little Z is correct. At least there are no dragons, and a queen prepared to use them.
Gary

Social climber
Desolation Basin, Calif.
Aug 14, 2017 - 02:10pm PT
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Aug 25, 2017 - 02:11pm PT
Excerpt below from:
https://theintercept.com/2017/08/25/north-korea-keeps-saying-it-might-give-up-its-nuclear-weapons-but-most-news-outlets-wont-tell-you-that/

North Korea Keeps Saying It Might Give Up Its Nuclear Weapons — But Most News Outlets Won’t Tell You That

...here’s what you don’t know, unless you’re an obsessive North Korea-watcher:

Also starting on July 4, North Korea has been saying over and over again that it might put its nuclear weapons and missiles on the negotiating table if the United States would end its own threatening posture.

This fact has been completely obscured by U.S. and other western media. For the most part, newspapers and television have simply ignored North Korea’s position. When they haven’t ignored it, they’ve usually mispresented it as its opposite – i.e., claiming that North Korea is saying that it will never surrender its nuclear weapons under any circumstances. And on the rare occasions when North Korea’s statements are mentioned accurately, they’re never given the prominence they deserve.

North Korea’s proclamations have been closely tracked by Robert Carlin, currently a visiting scholar at Stanford University’s Center for International Security and Cooperation and formerly head of the Northeast Asia Division in the State Department’s intelligence arm. Carlin has visited North Korea over 30 times.

Via email, Carlin described how it is difficult but critical to accurately decode North Korean communications. “Observers dismiss as unimportant what the North Koreans say,” Carlin writes, and “therefore don’t read it carefully, except of course if it is colorful, fiery language that makes for lovely headlines. Some of what the North says is simply propaganda and can be read with one eye closed. Other things are written and edited very carefully, and need to be read very carefully. And then, having been read, they need to be compared with past statements, and put in context.”

With that in mind, here’s Kim Jong-un’s statement on July 4:

[T]he DPRK would neither put its nukes and ballistic rockets on the table of negotiations in any case nor flinch even an inch from the road of bolstering the nuclear force chosen by itself unless the U.S. hostile policy and nuclear threat to the DPRK are definitely terminated. [emphasis added]

That formulation again appeared in an August 7 government statement after the United Nations Security Council passed new sanctions on North Korea. The same day, North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong Ho also said it during a speech at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations regional forum in the Philippines.
'Pass the Pitons' Pete

Big Wall climber
like Ontario, Canada, eh?
Aug 25, 2017 - 02:18pm PT
Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!!

If the above were true, that would be great news. Still, is that crazy Korean guy's dick really THAT small?
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Sands Motel , Las Vegas
Aug 25, 2017 - 10:14pm PT
PTPP... If his missile launches are any indicator i'd say he's got a ways to go in making it into the mens club...
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Oct 10, 2017 - 09:03am PT
I ran across this National Geographic video yesterday. What a bizarre contrast between the extreme luxury of this largely empty resort and what ordinary North Koreans have to deal with every day!

[Click to View YouTube Video]
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Oct 10, 2017 - 09:17am PT
If yer in the in group N Korea can be bitchin’!


Special Report: In Kim Jong Un's summer palace, fun meets guns
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-tourism-wonsan-specialrepo/special-report-in-kim-jong-uns-summer-palace-fun-meets-guns-idUSKBN1CF16E
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Oct 10, 2017 - 12:28pm PT
This guy Trump intends to be a man of history.
He's going to do it - he's going to drop the bomb -
he's going to use nukes to get his way.

I can't believe it's come to this - that I'm
actually inclined to bet this way at this point
over the alternative.

Even a 10% chance is scary as fuk.
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Oct 10, 2017 - 01:22pm PT
"Trump" doesn't do anything he's not told to do as there are things and people he holds dear.

Let's get that clear.

poliszbob

Mountain climber
Bellingham, WA
Jan 10, 2018 - 11:14am PT
I love how she says North Korea is a terrible country since there is only one channel on TV, and no internet. That would crush the souls of most people who post on here.

For most people born in Western style democracies, the whole situation is impossible to relate to. I think only people who grew up in places like North Korea can understand and relate.
While growing up behind "Iron Curtain" and experiencing this type of situation, the worst part of life in places like that is the idea of complete lack of possibilities in the future and absolute lack of choices.
BigB

Trad climber
Red Rock
Jan 10, 2018 - 11:24am PT
"Trump" doesn't do anything he's not told to do as there are things and people he holds dear.

Let's get that clear.

thank you for that response fear.
now please grab me another beer.
While I sit on the side and jeer ;)
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Jan 10, 2018 - 11:53am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]

from Wikipedia:

Crossing the Line (Korean: 푸른 눈의 평양시민, A Blue-Eyed Pyongyang Citizen in North Korea) is a 2006 British documentary film by Daniel Gordon and Nicholas Bonner.
The film is about a former U.S. Army soldier, James J. Dresnok, who defected to North Korea on 15 August 1962. Shown at the 2007 Sundance Film Festival, it was nominated for the Grand Jury Prize.

It was first screened in 2007 on the BBC. The film centred on Dresnok's history, highlighting his unhappiness in America, and particularly his desertion from the United States Army in 1962 to the DPRK. It showed Dresnok in present-day in Pyongyang (where he lived to his death), interacting with his North Korean family and friends. Dresnok spoke exclusively to the filmmakers about his childhood, his desertion, his life in a country completely foreign and quite hostile to his own, his fellow defectors, and his wife and children.[1]

Dresnok is shown with fellow defectors, including Charles Robert Jenkins, who returned to Japan to be with his wife, Hitomi Soga (a victim of kidnapping by the North Koreans), while filming was taking place.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jan 10, 2018 - 12:55pm PT
Why do crazy people like such crappy hairdos?
kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Jan 10, 2018 - 01:40pm PT
Messages 1 - 172 of total 172 in this topic
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta