Climate Change: Why aren't more people concerned about it?

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 1521 - 1540 of total 1564 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
tuolumne_tradster

Trad climber
Leading Edge of North American Plate
Apr 17, 2017 - 03:58pm PT
Putin endorses Pruitt...

http://priceofoil.org/2017/04/03/putin-denies-humans-cause-climate-change-endorses-scott-pruitt/
Jay S

Mountain climber
Silver Gate, Mt
Apr 17, 2017 - 06:48pm PT
Climate change reroutes a Yukon river
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/17/science/climate-change-glacier-yukon-river.html?_r=0
Malemute

Ice climber
great white north
Apr 18, 2017 - 06:44am PT
http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/28/us/sutter-climate-opinion-maps/index.html
Malemute

Ice climber
great white north
Apr 19, 2017 - 06:43am PT
I realized that many of the other people denying anthropogenic climate change were being funded by the fossil fuel industry and that almost everyone else – most importantly, the vast majority of climate scientists – agreed on the human cause.

I quickly discovered that every single argument meant to dismiss the science or discredit it was rooted in profound ignorance. Which makes sense in hindsight as how can we expect conservative bloggers to know anything about carbon isotopes, silicate weathering, aerosol dimming, albedo effects, mean resident times of green house gasses etc.

Then I started thinking about it on my own and realized that everyone who was a “denier” had a vested financial interest in ignoring the problems of fossil fuels. Basically coal companies and oil companies.

the major deniers were becoming more and more just cranks.

http://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2017/04/changing-minds-on-a-changing-climate/
Malemute

Ice climber
great white north
Apr 19, 2017 - 11:36am PT
tuolumne_tradster

Trad climber
Leading Edge of North American Plate
Apr 19, 2017 - 02:40pm PT
Age of Consequences is a great documentary film. That short trailer doesn't really give you a sense for how well organized and comprehensive the film is.

More info here...

http://theageofconsequences.com
moosedrool

climber
Andrzej Citkowicz far away from Poland
Apr 19, 2017 - 02:46pm PT
Who gives a damn about the climate change, when the world as we know it will be over soon.

Any guesses why?

Moosedoom
tuolumne_tradster

Trad climber
Leading Edge of North American Plate
Apr 19, 2017 - 04:14pm PT
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rapid-climate-changes-turn-north-woods-into-moose-graveyard/

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/moose-are-dying-in-horrible-ways-due-to-climate-change

moosedrool

climber
Andrzej Citkowicz far away from Poland
Apr 19, 2017 - 04:42pm PT
TT, I haven't read the article, but whoever puts moose on danger, is not my friend.

Elk, on a the other hand, are even worse. Pretending to be moose. How pathetic is that?!

Moose

tuolumne_tradster

Trad climber
Leading Edge of North American Plate
Apr 19, 2017 - 04:50pm PT
climate change
puts moose on danger

the guy in the photo ^^^ is a wildlife biologist who is trying to help moose. He is conducting research to determine what is killing off moose in the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa area.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Apr 20, 2017 - 08:54am PT
Interesting observations in this article:
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/04/explaining_science_won_t_fix_information_illiteracy.html


A key point is this: the political polarization we see in scientific issues like global warming is not just caused by stupid people not getting it. Even people who can articulate the details of a scientific consensus, thus demonstrating that they are not just plain stupid and unable to grasp the concepts, even these people are subject to the "liberal"/"conservative" political polarization of viewpoints.

The article makes great observations, but I don't think it goes far enough to explore the "why" of it. I think they should explore the dance between the emotional and intellectual parts of our minds, and explore what emotional needs are being met by political alignment, which usurps people's ability to make decisions based on facts and reason.


My conclusion is that people's fear of not belonging to a tribe (and fear of invading tribes) drives them more than the fear poisoned air and water, the fear of economic misfortune, the fear of losing democracy and large-scale organized civilization. Returning to the stone age with small tribes would be physically uncomfortable for most people accustomed to soft chairs and smart phones, but it would be psychologically more comfortable for them. People crave simplicity, certainty, identity, fellowship. All of the other things that seem like they should be more important for our society, these all take a back seat when they are juxtaposed with the basic individual human cravings of simplicity, certainty, identity, fellowship.
clifff

Mountain climber
golden, rollin hills of California
Apr 21, 2017 - 02:07am PT
Racing To The Precipice: Prof Noam Chomsky (March 2017)

capseeboy

Social climber
portland, oregon
Apr 21, 2017 - 10:18am PT
People don't see their own personal consumer behavior as part of the problem. "It's those people doing it!", not me.

Stooopid Americans.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 21, 2017 - 11:13am PT
Credit: Craig Fry
tuolumne_tradster

Trad climber
Leading Edge of North American Plate
Apr 21, 2017 - 01:37pm PT
"The Death of Expertise"

NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Apr 21, 2017 - 01:56pm PT
Craig, to be fair, that graph shows a clearly increasing trend but nothing in that graph pins the causation on humans. It could be part of some century-long oscillation based on phenomena we don't understand yet. I think it is more damning to look over very long time cycles (tens or hundreds of thousands of years) and then look at the differences that have happened since the industrial revolution. That is so striking that it quickly throws into doubt that any process independent of humans could have caused it.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 21, 2017 - 02:16pm PT
The graph speaks for itself

It shows the concentration of CO2 from 1958 to 2017
That's all

We all know where the CO2 came from, and we all know that the CO2 concentration has varied over time.
It may have changed before on a similar time scale, but when it did it was because of some cataclysmic volcanic activity,
it has never changed this quickly since human life has inhabited earth

every time it did reach >400 ppm, it caused the climate to be hotter than it was at 310 ppm
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Apr 21, 2017 - 03:01pm PT
The only thing that graph speaks to me is that carbon content has a seasonal cycle within each year and a clearly increasing trend over the last few decades.

If your intent is to make clear that human activity is a cause of climate change, and that we need to change our behavior to reverse the alarming trend.... Well in that case, your choice of timescale in the graph can backfire because this slice of data leaves huge room for doubt that natural cycles bigger than humans are the cause. This creates the space for disingenuous people to spin the argument in a misleading direction, and it empowers people who are still somehow sitting on the fence to keep ignoring the problem. A much longer timescale of the same graph would be much more compelling to an analytical mind.

And if you are trying to convince a mind not receptive to analytical arguments, why bother showing the graph?

Edit: I suppose you might be side-stepping the issue of human causality and just focusing on the fact that the higher values are correlated with lots of things humans will not find desirable, which presumably would motivate human interventions? But if the belief in human causation is not affirmed, then people will feel discouraged that human activity can be impactful to reverse the trend ostensibly caused by global non-human processes.

monolith

climber
state of being
Apr 21, 2017 - 03:13pm PT
NutsAgain, you really need to dig deeper. Carbon isotope ratios show man is responsible. Get in there and learn for yourself instead of whining about a post that didn't have everything you wanted to see.
Malemute

Ice climber
great white north
Apr 21, 2017 - 04:44pm PT
Craig, to be fair, that graph shows a clearly increasing trend but nothing in that graph pins the causation on humans

Carbon isotope ratios show man is responsible.
True dat.

Also one could convert barrels per day to ppm CO₂

8,887 grams of CO₂ /gallon of gasoline =8.887 × 10-3 metric tons CO₂/gallon of gasoline
https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gases-equivalencies-calculator-calculations-and-references

For 2016, the IEA Oil Market Report forecasts worldwide average demand of nearly 96 million barrels of oil and liquid fuels per day – that works out to more than 35 billion barrels a year.
https://www.iea.org/about/faqs/oil/

35 billion barrels/year * 42 US gallons/barrel * 8.887 × 10-3 metric tons CO₂/gallon = 13.2 *10**9 metric tons/year

but 1ppm CO₂ in the atmosphere = 2.12 gigatons
https://onlineconversion.vbulletin.net/forum/main-forums/convert-and-calculate/11072-convert-gtco2-to-ppm-rise-in-atmosphere

so 13.2*10**9 metric tons/year = 6.2ppm increase per year

our calculation ignores CO₂ dissolved in the ocean, which will lower the final observed value IN THE ATMOSPHERE.

The annual growth of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) during 2015, above three parts per million (ppm) per year, was the largest ever recorded at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii, said climate researchers Wednesday.
https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/2016/03/10/record-annual-increase-of-carbon-dioxide-observed-for-2015/

As the ocean becomes more saturated with CO₂, we will see more of the full increase of 6ppm per year in the atmosphere.


You can BS all you want, but that won't change the physics.
Messages 1521 - 1540 of total 1564 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews