Ignoring the cost of this administration's hostile actions toward business continues to cost Americans jobs.

Why would Russia interfere in the U.S. election? Because it sometimes works.

More generally, an intervention can only succeed if someone in the targeted country chooses to cooperate with the outside power. American and Soviet interventions only worked because the rival superpowers could find parties whose beliefs (or greed) proved simpatico. But the Soviet Union never successfully intervened in an American election because no major political figure would want to be associated with the Soviet Union. Collaboration would have been unthinkable.

Until this week, one would have thought that a similar taboo would have applied to profiting from the apparent theft and release of documents by a foreign actor in an attempt to influence an American election. Giving credence to such documents might seem tempting, especially if juicy revelations seemed to undermine a rival. Of course, such documents could easily be forged (as some in the DNC leak may have been). And, more important, even if the documents are real, their release hardly constitutes a public good, since a foreign power would be deciding what gets released and when in the pursuit of its own self interest.

The best strategy for the national interest, then, would be to put such documents beyond the pale. Yet the Trump campaign has embraced the tactical upside of the scandal, with the candidate himself even taking to Twitter to celebrate the Democrats’ misfortune. Regardless of whether this document leak was the product of a foreign government’s actions, Trump’s choice raises the likelihood that the next one will be.

Hillary will continue to murder in the ME

"There are forces that want to take us back 50 years.

We are not going back, we are going forward!
You gotta vote harder this year than you ever ever voted before!"

Escopeta, you are welcome to add substance to this thread.

Nice try, Norton, but the Democrats own the anemia in this recovery, since all of the policies that weakened it are theirs. The housing bubble had bipartisan parents, as shown by the bipartisan agreement on making housing easier to purchase for those who could not really afford it, and keeping Fannie and Freddie operating as they were, despite warnings from conservatives, and repeated editorials in the Wall Street Journal, among others, for years about their dangers. Mssrs. Dodd and Frank were two of the most active people in maintaining the housing expansion's status quo, and resisting reform. Those expecting Dodd and Frank to fix the problems they helped create engaged in Einsteinian insanity.

Summary
The savings and loan crisis of the 1980s and early
1990s produced the greatest collapse of U.S. financial
institutions since the Great Depression. Over the
1986–1995 period, 1,043 thrifts with total assets of over
$500 billion failed. The large number of failures overwhelmed
the resources of the FSLIC, so U.S. taxpayers
were required to back up the commitment
extended to insured depositors of the failed institutions.
As of December 31, 1999, the thrift crisis had
cost taxpayers approximately $124 billion and the
thrift industry another $29 billion, for an estimated
total loss of approximately $153 billion. The losses
were higher than those predicted in the late 1980s,
when the RTC was established, but below those forecasted
during the early to mid-1990s, at the height of
the crisis.

The Republicans since Goldwater/Reagan were the party of deregulate it, deregulate it, deregulate it. Sure, the Democrats eventually got on board the band wagon (not to their credit), but Reagan laid the foundation that any government is bad. Getting rid of any regulation is good. The private sector will always do better.

Hillary did not order the death of a single human on this planet ever, and she didn't do it with her own hands.
Any possible deaths that she would have had any involvement with would of been publicized, and that hasn't happened.

plain and simple
You don't know what the hell you are talking about

Nobody, least of all Reagan, has suggested that all government is bad. Just that in many situations government is the problem, not the solution.

Listen to her cackle about the murder of Qaddafi...
She's a murderer, plain and simple.

You obviously did not hear him speak the words that defined Republican thinking for a generation.