Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
HighDesertDJ
Trad climber
|
|
Feb 15, 2016 - 10:30am PT
|
So the VA emergency room requires an appointment? Is that what this means? The VA doesn't allow vets to got to emergency rooms at other facilities? If Scalia had a doctors appointment did he just "die while waiting to see the doctor?"
|
|
Stewart
Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
|
|
Feb 15, 2016 - 04:32pm PT
|
So how did you guys like the "Why We Fight" films?
Better than PotatoHead's smoloko.com poison, I hope.
|
|
MisterE
Gym climber
Small Town with a Big Back Yard
|
|
Feb 15, 2016 - 06:43pm PT
|
Don't make me nuke this! ;^)
|
|
wilbeer
Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
|
|
Feb 15, 2016 - 06:53pm PT
|
Feel the Bern.
What?:)
|
|
Stewart
Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
|
|
Feb 15, 2016 - 10:05pm PT
|
couchmaster: I rarely read your, either.
Too bad you didn't have the intellectual integrity to learn what kind of a nation so many of your forefathers gave their lives to create for future generations.
BTW: if PotatoHead isn't a Nazi, he's a certifiable lunatic.
|
|
ß Î Ø T Ç H
Boulder climber
ne'er–do–well
|
|
Feb 15, 2016 - 10:25pm PT
|
Sanders?
I like his fried chicken.
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Feb 15, 2016 - 10:36pm PT
|
They're using tactical nukes now in Syria by these stoopid fukheads backed by the western coliation of aszholes all while you dipshit sterile moron politards are wanking off on the internet.
You people are insane .....
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
Feb 16, 2016 - 06:12am PT
|
Really--tactical nukes?
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
Feb 16, 2016 - 07:20am PT
|
Great article crankster, and an excellent reason why a Sanders nomination would be a complete failure and disaster for progressive policies. There would be another Scalia if Sanders gets the nomination.
|
|
John Duffield
Mountain climber
New York
|
|
Feb 16, 2016 - 07:26am PT
|
As a voter, who came of age in the late 60s, I'm not so sure, I would dismiss the Sanders candidacy so easily. I did skim the letter.
For one thing, people need to consider the effect on young voters. They've dangled Sanders in front of young idealistic voters, while they try, for the second time, to impose Hillary Clinton on the party. The long-term effects, will be profound.
|
|
10b4me
Mountain climber
Retired
|
|
Feb 16, 2016 - 07:36am PT
|
nominating Bernie would pave the way for a Trump win.
Many of Sanders supporters are first time voters, and are hellbent on seeing Bernie win. If Hillary gets the nomination, I see them sitting out the election.
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
Feb 16, 2016 - 07:46am PT
|
Maybe Hillary has too much baggage--it's definitely an open issue.
But a tax-raising socialist is DOA. He's not leading among dems in the primary: how could he possibly win a general?
Even without Faux News and its allies tarring him as the latest incarnation of Stalin, which will happen--make no mistake, many people already view him as a commie, even among Tacoans here who should know better.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
Feb 16, 2016 - 07:47am PT
|
Great article crankster, and an excellent reason why a Sanders nomination would be a complete failure and disaster for progressive policies.
Actually, I think the premiss of the op-ed is wrong:
... the problem isn’t that Clinton isn’t liberal enough; the problem, according to the best data we have, is that she may be too liberal.
No, the problem is that Clinton takes millions from Wall Street and is a puppet of the establishment.
People focus on Sanders' "welfare" programs as a way of attacking him. When everybody knows, those ideas will never pass in Congress.
Bernie is brave enough to say that climate change in our #1 enemy. And if you look at what scientists are saying, he is right.
I don't think the fractured GOP has a chance in this election cycle--when any of those candidates join a real debate, with real questions (like they're asking in the Dem debates), the GOP will look like the fools that they are. Sure, they will get close to half the country voting for them. That'd happen even if they got Michale Jackson's chimp to run. But the truth is, the next president won't be a Republican, unless there is serious voter fraud.
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
Feb 16, 2016 - 07:48am PT
|
Wishful thinking.
|
|
John Duffield
Mountain climber
New York
|
|
Feb 16, 2016 - 07:49am PT
|
Many of Sanders supporters are first time voters, and are hellbent on seeing Bernie win. If Hillary gets the nomination, I see them sitting out the election.
Indeed. My wife is a Sanders supporter - though not a first timer - and she says, if it comes to Hillary vs Trump, she will just stay home.
The Democrats, have made a massive mistake here, as I have been saying for months. They need to accept it and move on.
|
|
Gary
Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
|
|
Feb 16, 2016 - 08:16am PT
|
Better to vote for what you want and not get it, than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
|
|
skcreidc
Social climber
SD, CA
|
|
Feb 16, 2016 - 08:33am PT
|
Thank you Gary! That OPED is just what it is an opinion. And one that I think is wrong. You Bern doubters are missing the boat, and/or just trying to undercut his support. Tisk tisk...
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
Feb 16, 2016 - 08:36am PT
|
What good does it do to nominate someone who can't win?
It would be huge slide backwards if republicans take over. How would that make anyone feel better about the outcome?
|
|
skcreidc
Social climber
SD, CA
|
|
Feb 16, 2016 - 08:37am PT
|
That's the point you are missing. Bernie will win.
edit; this is not your normal election year
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|