Most or Least Sandbagged Areas and Ratings in North America?

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 41 - 51 of total 51 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
hobo_dan

Social climber
Minnesota
Nov 26, 2014 - 07:26pm PT
Devils Lake- harder
Ciy of Rocks and Yosemite- easier

Devils Tower? NO need for numbers- if you can run the long distance you don't need no stinkin' sand bag
RyanD

climber
Squamish
Nov 26, 2014 - 08:19pm PT
Bahhhhhh! Never noticed much of a dif in grades from different places I've visited.

Everywhere has their test pieces & their gimmes.

Once you are used to the stone and style of movement it shouldn't vary much. Some places take longer than others to adapt to because you don't have the prerequisite experience with that style of climbing, but I don't think that's reason to call an entire area sandbagged.

Personally, I'm more interested in the areas with the nicest lines on the best rock these days.
i'm gumby dammit

Sport climber
da ow
Nov 26, 2014 - 08:29pm PT
Nice thread. I thought about starting one like this as we toured the southwestish.
Owens River seemed pretty spot on, although China Doll seemed tough for a 8 and sporty to the first bolt.
Red Rocks seemed easy.
Only climbed at one spot in Moab, but it seemed fairly easy.

City of Rocks - Seems like the sport routes are a tad soft while the trad routes can be fairly stiff.

Tahoe is all over the place. Sugarloaf seems hard. The leap seems right on. The newer sport routes (at least on the south shore) seem om the softer side.
My first leads were at Luther Spires. Going from clipping bolts on Jane's Spy to a 5.7 trad route at the loaf was quite an awakening.
AP

Trad climber
Calgary
Nov 26, 2014 - 08:53pm PT
How about sandbagging yourself?
a few years ago a local climber went back to a route he had put up in1975. Chris had rated it 5.7 at the time.
This time he thought it was 5.9and backed off due to poor pro.
Kalimon

Social climber
Ridgway, CO
Nov 26, 2014 - 09:46pm PT
Ratings don't mean sh#t.
Evel

Trad climber
Nedsterdam CO
Nov 27, 2014 - 05:42am PT
Like Pete, I, too thought of Seneca Rocks before I even clicked on the thread.
Anyone remember the cover of climbing with the title 'so you think you can climb 5.10?'
Jon Clark

climber
philadelphia
Nov 27, 2014 - 06:07am PT
I'm curious how people define a sandbag. A mere letter grade, a full number, or simply a climb you got slapped around on that you expected to send?
Larry

Trad climber
Bisbee
Nov 27, 2014 - 06:39am PT
Where do you "send" a route?
Jon Clark

climber
philadelphia
Nov 27, 2014 - 06:42am PT
Not sure Larry, perhaps the same place you "take" a dump.
MisterE

Gym climber
Bishop, CA
Nov 27, 2014 - 07:08am PT
Canadian Rockies 5.9 A2...Haha! Yup.

Agree with Granite Mountain, AZ

What about Looking Glass and Whitesides in North Carolina? My experiences are the are both hard for the grades AND frightening!
bixquite

Social climber
humboldt nation
Nov 27, 2014 - 08:55am PT
index will make you check ya self
Messages 41 - 51 of total 51 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta