Dam those rivers


Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 1 - 20 of total 26 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>

Social climber
Colorado Plateau
Topic Author's Original Post - Sep 6, 2013 - 09:36am PT
Just got the sad news that a major dam in China has been approved, one that will inundate critical breeding habitat for large herbivores upon which the snow leopard prey. Oh well, f*#k those stupid snow leopards anyway.

Lake Tahoe
Sep 6, 2013 - 09:49am PT
When there are less herbivores for the snow leopards to eat, there will be less snow leopards. When there is less fertile land downstream for people to farm, there will be less people. It's a natural cycle, and our (homo sapiens) growth will also be our death.

Would we rather they build nuclear power plants?

Hardman Knott

Gym climber
Muir Woods National Monument, Mill Valley, Ca
Sep 6, 2013 - 09:54am PT

Mountain climber
Okinawa, Japan
Sep 6, 2013 - 10:10am PT
These dams will have a big effect on the downstream Mekong ecology but I can't see how the snow leopard will be affected? They live at much higher altitudes than the Mekong drainage area, seldom appearing below 14,000 feet.

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Sep 6, 2013 - 10:29am PT

Credit: survival

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Sep 6, 2013 - 10:35am PT
Jan, thanks, I didn't want to point out the obvious. ;-) I'm also not too
sure that eastern end of the Snow Leopard's range really has any left in it
thanks to heavy poaching and no enforcement.

Social climber
Colorado Plateau
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 8, 2013 - 07:01pm PT
Pretty sure that 5500 m is 'high enough' for those stupid f*#king leopards. Pretty sure that destabilizing food sources by inundating upland valleys will further retard the continued survival of the remaining leopards.
Pretty sure that tossing up our hands and claiming survival of the fittest and accepting 'natural cyclicity' is a gross and lazy oversimplification. But anyway, f*#k those leopards, I think hydropower and a Chrysler for each Chinese is basically great.

Source: Pilkington, John. "Journey to the Source of the Mekong" Geographical: The Magazine of the Royal Geographical Society 76:7 (July 2004): 29. See article for more details.
photo not found
Missing photo ID#320324

photo not found
Missing photo ID#320325
Those lame-ass snow leopards thinkin' that they get some share of the high country real estate. Lazy f*#kers need to get a jerb. And building dams makes jerbs.

image from http://5z8.info/dogs-being-eaten_k6u2dt_startdownload

Social climber
So Cal
Sep 8, 2013 - 07:07pm PT
Would you rather have them burn coal?


should they just all f*#k off and die?

Social climber
Colorado Plateau
Topic Author's Reply - Sep 8, 2013 - 07:19pm PT
Replicating our country's not-so-sustainable dam-building experiments in their rush for development is hilarious and totally cute. I love it: especially when they build the dams atop fault structures which may then experience induced seismicity associated with concrete and water weight and lubrication. Especially when the dams are built up en echelon whence one failure may induce many. Anyway, f*#k those leopards. Need to get some jerbs.

Social climber
So Cal
Sep 8, 2013 - 07:33pm PT
How many trillions of tons of Fossil fuels would it take to replace the output of say Grand Coulee, Hoover Dam, the TVA over the last 70 years or so?
Delhi Dog

Good Question...
Sep 8, 2013 - 11:12pm PT
"How many trillions of tons of Fossil fuels would it take to replace the output of say Grand Coulee, Hoover Dam, the TVA over the last 70 years or so?"

^^ at past and current levels?
A heck of a lot.

However, is there anyone in their right mind think that our past and current consumption rate is sustainable no matter what we use?

Since you are asking somewhat of a rhetorical question might I ask, what would it be like if we hadn't build those dams? Would Vegas exist in all it's "glory". Would people have been more aware of their consumption and thought and acted differently about how they interact with the environment? Would we be further ahead with sustainable energy than we are now?

Sure an awful lot of power is needed to produce all the cute stuff we all buy from China. Never mind that often the people there are forced into producing all that crap for all the consumers of the world. AND never mind about all the people affected downstream (reference the water wars of the past for an insight into the future except on a grander scale, as well as the OP's article).

When does sustainable blends of power usage and production get priorities. When does the environment have a say (?) may just be the point.

The real question (with regards to the OP) is; does wildlife and the environment in and of itself deserve to exist in it's natural state without the interference of humans for no other reason than because it should?

Hydro, solar, nuclear, coal, wind, etc all have an impact, no question.

Humans can figure this sh#t out. They are not as stupid as some ST pundits suggests. They just choose to act that way.

Greed, the most damaging of human behavior.

Trad climber
Western America
Sep 8, 2013 - 11:37pm PT
The new dam with probably cause a snow leopard population explosion
per the Supertopo property of inverse logic: that the experts are always wrong.

Delhi Dog

Good Question...
Sep 8, 2013 - 11:47pm PT
From the article:

"Who’s Paying [for the dams]?

The China Development Bank (CDB) a Chinese govern-
ment bank, is expected to provide the majority of funding
for the Upper Mekong dams. The CDB raises funds interna-
tionally by selling bonds. In the past, US investment banks,
including Morgan Stanley, and Credit Suisse First Boston,
have helped facilitate sales by underwriting $830 million in
CDB bonds in 1997 and 1999. A third dam, Xiaowan,
began construction in December 2001 and is expected to be
completed in 2012. Impoundment of water during the wet
season for Xiaowan would increase dry season flows by up to
70% as far as 1,000 km downstream in Vientiane, Laos. The
dam would block 35 percent of the silt that nourishes the
fertile floodplains downstream"


Social climber
Colorado Plateau
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 9, 2013 - 10:00am PT

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Nov 9, 2013 - 04:03pm PT
Not noted for their environmental stewardship and they are paying the price with the world's worst pollution in some of their cities.
Snow leopards, wolves and himalayan brown bears, while endangered, have stabilized in some of their range....not so in China.

Mountain climber
Nov 9, 2013 - 05:58pm PT
Something is wrong with it DNA to be driven out of prime hunting
jungles up to barren mountains. Obvious genetic dead end although may
be good for ranching like the Chinese are doing with tigers. Extinction
will not happen.

Social climber
Colorado Plateau
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 30, 2013 - 08:29am PT
River That Flows Through Heaven
Wang Heng and Last Descents Expeditions Upper Yangtze 2013

Trad climber
Nov 30, 2013 - 09:04am PT
your ignorance has sunk a thousand ships
eh bharata?

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Nov 30, 2013 - 09:24am PT
Having participated in a Snow Leopard census in Central Asia I can assure
you that any census figures from there, or any part of Asia, are highly
suspect. Those that know don't talk and those that don't know do talk. I
was outside the house of a reknowned hunter who, I was told, had two skins
drying on his back wall. Because I was in the presence of government types
he politely answered my questions, to a point, but certainly did not proffer
any information. It was all very wink-wink, nod-nod - the way things have
been and will be for a long time to come over there because the governments
don't care and people are gonna do what they gotta do.

This wasn't that guy but you think this guy isn't gonna use his Mosin-Nagant
to protect his sheep and goats?
Credit: Reilly

Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Nov 30, 2013 - 10:46am PT
It gets hard to preach to others, when we won't do things, ourselves.

In Ca, we have a proposal on the table for a tunnel system around the bay delta to shuttle water to SoCal. The current system uses 1/10th of all the power in the State of Calif to pump that water over the Tehachapi Mtns into the LA Basin.

But there is another way:


It is totally doable, it is not particularly expensive, it totally changes the equation of water in LA.
Messages 1 - 20 of total 26 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

Try a free sample topo!

SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews