Topic Author's Original Post - Dec 31, 2012 - 02:19pm PT
Credit: B_E_S
I just ordered Open BSD from Colorado. Should I buy a
external hard drive for BSD or make a dual boot system?
Would this protocol that processes at up 400% faster
than the fastest ethernet connection require the forbidden
Kernel change from years ago allegedly ordered not to be
changed by the courts?
/
Was this ruling based upon Patent law or Copywrite or something
else? Has the case had a valid order for disclosure to publication?
If so with the second question please give the annotated authority
reference look up(s).
The standard GENERIC OpenBSD kernel, as maintained by the project, is strongly recommended for universal use, and customized kernels are not supported by the project, in line with the philosophy that 'attempts to customize or "optimize" the kernel causes more problems than they solve.'
ya looking for problems?
BSD is open source code, why would there be an IP issue?
Ghost seems more to be for hooking up video cameras to a personal
system or for fast data transfer to/from external hard drives etc.
I don't think it's flash related and I deleted flash. Im not
certain either if its used for infrared.
zBrown cable limits seem to be about 100 mbits slower. I assume
400 is max for the protocol.
justthemaid it may not work with Open BSD or equivalents if kernel
clock speed needs to be readjusted? I really want to read about the
case. KM wants about $2000.00 for the Kernel readjusting specs though
I think there maybe a $40.00 timed out version?
Ed thanks but I think there maybe another case after that and it
deals with an order about Kernel tuning if its not the same case.
Im more interested in the tuning ruling or rulings allegedly
prohibiting a certain adjustment though numerous other adjustments
I think maybe done. What kernel configuration may not be configured?
A disciple of another sect once came to Drescher as he was eating his morning meal. "I would like to give you this personality test," said the outsider, "because I want you to be happy." Drescher took the paper that was offered him and put it into the toaster: "I wish the toaster to be happy, too."
This place seems to have computer people regardless of whether they are
climbers. The main purpose for the BSD purchase is that I need a office
suit. This system just came with the OS and Office is too much.
the BSD article in Wiki has two places where "kernel tuning" but the legal issues seemed to be about names rather than any tuning issues.
what years are you interested in? this bullshit has been going on for ever....
you probably need an attorney to deal with this, not a techie, since your concerns over legal actions have more to do with various companies defending their putative "copy rights" than with any real issues with the operating system.
For the reasons stated above, the court concludes that Novell is the owner of the UNIX and UnixWare copyrights. Therefore, SCO's First Claim for Relief for slander of title and Third Claim for Relief for specific performance are dismissed, as are the copyright ownership portions of SCO's Fifth Claim for Relief for unfair competition and Second Claim for Relief for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The court denies SCO's cross-motion for summary judgment on its own slander of title, breach of contract, and unfair competition claims, and on Novell's slander of title claim. Accordingly, Novell's slander of title claim is still at issue.
The court also concludes that, to the extent that SCO has a copyright to enforce, SCO can simultaneously pursue both a copyright infringement claim and a breach of contract claim based on the non-compete restrictions in the license back of the Licensed Technology under APA and the TLA. The court further concludes that there has not been a change of control that released the non-compete restrictions of the license, and the non-compete restrictions of the license are not void under California law. Accordingly, Novell's motion for summary judgment on SCO's non-compete claim in its Second Claim for breach of contract and Fifth Claim for Relief for unfair competition is granted to the extent that SCO's claims require ownership of the UNIX and UnixWare copyrights, and denied in all other regards.
Furthermore, the court concludes, as a matter of law, that the only reasonable interpretation of the term "SVRX License" in the APA is all licenses related to the SVRX products listed in Item VI of Schedule 1.1(a) to the APA. Therefore, Novell is entitled to a declaration of rights under its Fourth Claim for Relief that it was and is entitled, at its sole discretion, to direct SCO to waive its claims against IBM and Sequent, and SCO is obligated to recognize Novell's waiver of SCO's claims against IBM and Sequent. Accordingly, Novell's motion for partial summary judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief for declaratory judgment is granted, and SCO's cross-motion for summary judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief is denied.
Finally, the court concludes, as a matter of law, that the only reasonably interpretation of all SVRX Licenses includes no temporal restriction of SVRX Licenses existing at the time of the APA. The court further concludes that because a portion of SCO's 2003 Sun and Microsoft Agreements indisputably licenses SVRX products listed under Item VI of Schedule 1.1(a) to the APA, even if only incidental to a license for UnixWare, SCO is obligated under the APA to account for and pass through to Novell the appropriate portion relating to the license of SVRX products. Because SCO failed to do so, it breached its fiduciary duty to Novell under the APA and is liable for conversion.
The court, however, is precluded from granting a constructive trust with respect to the payments SCO received under the 2003 Sun and Microsoft Agreements because there is a question of fact as to the appropriate amount of SVRX Royalties SCO owes to Novell based on the portion of SVRX products contained in each agreement. Furthermore, because Novell has obtained the information that it would otherwise obtain through an accounting during the course of this litigation, the court denies Novell's Ninth Claim for Relief for an accounting. However, the court also notes that SCO has a continuing contractual obligation to comply with the accounting and reporting requirements set forth in the APA.
Accordingly, Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction [Docket No. 147] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; SCO's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims [Docket No. 180] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim [Docket No. 171] is GRANTED; SCO's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim [Docket No. 224] is DENIED; SCO's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its First, Second, and Fifth Claims and Novell's First Claim [Docket No. 258] is DENIED; Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Copyright Ownership of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition [Docket No. 271] is GRANTED; Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claims in its Second and Fifth Claims [Docket No. 273] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance [Docket No. 275] is GRANTED; and Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title for Failure to Establish Special Damages [Docket No. 277] is MOOT.
twistedcrank ls -pci is much shorter than the above but its
not yet available for hardware in the loop determination.
matlab command ans=fi(pi) gave easier to read word sizes
with hardware in the loop but the design boards and chips
for AMD Intel and other test were expensive.
Referencing above and noting ive been all through the devices.
I can't find any Texas Instruments? I may take out IEEE 1394
though im not certain yet.
I got this system used. It has 2 admin accounts and im trying
to get it to 1. Look below the blue outlines and you can see
duplicates?
Ed at freebsd there is a book along the title of Linux Jail
from inside BSD. Brandon I don't have KM's email anymore and I
couldn't find it at freebsd otherwise I would have emailed
him to ask about this.
Let us know!