graniteclimber
Trad climber
The Illuminati -- S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Division
|
|
The floors connected the inner tube (the core) with the outer tube (the perimeter frame)
What are you saying unzipped exactly?
It was in the NIST report. I don't think they used the word "unzip" but that's what they were describing. I had posts on it in the deleted thread that I spent time on and I don't have the time to redo them now.
But if you like this topic, you should read the NIST report. You don't have to agree with it but at least you will know what you are not agreeing with.
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
If there is nothing to hide then why continue to keep the Pentagon surveillance videos hidden?
|
|
Karl Baba
Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
|
|
Sorry I linked the wrong image kman. I guess the issue is if that plane is drawn to scale and how much damage the light wingtips made. Wingspan is 125 feet. Count the windows in your image to compare distances
Personally, I think all this demolition and 757 didn't hit the pentagon evidence, true or not is a huge distraction from the real damning questions that come from following the money, able danger, the war games, Norman M's testimony, the identity of the hijackers and how they got their visas and that aspect of it
Peace
Karl
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
The problem with that photo, Karl, is that you can't see anything.
If the graphic that shows the drawn-in 757 is correct, then Houston, we have a problem.
But I agree--we can battle back and forth over the physical evidence. We can also ignore testimony from eye witnesses. We can also ignore the reports that 6-8 of the terrorist "fliers" were still alive after the events.
We can also ignore building don't just collapse they way the three Trade Center towers did, or that the damage at the Pentagon is inconsistent with other airliner plane crashes.
Oh, there is just so much to ignore.
The real key is to follow the money, and to look at the reactions from the events.
W stonewalling any investigation, and a refusal to follow the money. The list of reactions, too, is so very long.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
If the graphic that shows the drawn-in 757 is correct, then Houston, we have a problem.
Why? The damage on the building seems to correspond well to the shape of the airplane. A lot of damage where the fuselage and engines hit and only a little damage where the wing tips hit the walls.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
We can also ignore testimony from eye witnesses.
I guess that you mean the eyewitnesses that saw an airplane flying into pentagon?
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
"...only a little damage where the wing tips hit the walls. "
You mean 'zero' damage where the wing tips should have hit the walls. Look again, there is no sign of any impact where the wing tips should have hit.
As for eye witnesses, there were many who saw different things. But the ones who claim seeing other than an 575 are ignored. Also ignored are those from the other two sites (WTC & Flight 93 crash site).
Cheers, out.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
But the ones who claim seeing other than an 575 are ignored.
Obviously ignored by everyone because I do not think that there are information about any .
You mean 'zero' damage where the wing tips should have hit the walls. Look again, there is no sign of any impact where the wing tips should have hit.
I don't know what you see but I see damage.
Do you also think that the collapse of wtc 1 and wtc 2 looks exactly like controlled demolition?
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
You may argue that the wing tips were just flimsy aluminum shells but those big ol wads of titanium known as jet engines, where are they and where is there damage?
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
^^^ Well that blew my mind ^^^
|
|
Dr. F.
Ice climber
SoCal
|
|
By continual reinforcements of all the false notions we've been fed by the governments and the controlled medias, you will trust everything they feed you.
Thus proponents of the "Official Versions" are nothing but stupid sheep led into the slaughterhouses of their own makings.
Just as the stupid fools who maintain and support the barbaric mechanistic animal slaughterhouses and continually eat the remnants of such madness they themselves will be subjected by providence itself to the same slaughter of their intelligence .....
Classic Werner
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
You may argue that the wing tips were just flimsy aluminum shells but those big ol wads of titanium known as jet engines, where are they and where is there damage?
Sorry but I don't know what to say. There are big holes and a lot of damage where the jet engines would have hit the building in the picture I look at.
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
But where are the tons of titanium?
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
I have found that people in the 'minority within the minority' have really not taken the time they should to consider everything.
Agree, they should watch the "box video" if they are not already convinced. All needed to understand that the towers couldn't fell like that is a simple application of conservation of momentum.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
But where are the tons of titanium?
Inside the building? Maybe under the foam? In the pile of debris?
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
Inside the building? Maybe under the foam? In the pile of debris?
Nope, never found. Check out the melting temperature of titanium as compared ton the burn temps jet fuel.
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
Sorry but i have to laugh uproariously. If you think that teeny part came off a 757 jet engine then you are seriously fooled.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
Nope, never found. Check out the melting temperature of titanium as compared ton the burn temps jet fuel.
I discussed a picture and you made an obviously incorrect claim about that picture and instead of acknowledging that you start talking about something else.
This is so typical about these discussions. There are a million different conspiracy claims that very often contradicts each other. When one of their claims is disproved they just continue to the next claims and ignoring the first claim. After a while they get back to the old claims again and the circle continues.
What about trying to come up with a single coherent theory that is in agreement with the evidence? There are for example several witnesses that saw a low flying plane heading towards pentagon. There are no witnesses (that I know about) that saw a missile heading towards pentagon.
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!