Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
after the plane was established straight and
level.
It is the getting straight and level I have serious doubts about.
Desperate to deny.
One wonders why?
|
|
monolith
climber
albany,ca
|
|
I said a real 757 simulator Philo, not a gaming simulator.
The same simulator airline pilots use.
Try to focus Philo.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
[Click to View YouTube Video]
"This man is describing radiation poisoning. Many first responders got leukemia which is only caused by radiation. Period."
Ground Zero: The point directly above or below a nuclear explosion.
~Websters dictionary, 1999.
|
|
Reilly
Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
|
|
Philo, the planes were at cruise altitude on autopilot, how much more
straight and level do you want? The only tough part was being able to
read the switch labeled 'Autopilot' to turn it off. If I recall that was
one of the specific things the sickos asked about when they forked over
their $$$$ for the real sim training.
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
Reilly what is the cruising altitude for a 757? And what is the altitude of the ground floor of the Pentagon? What happened between those two points? Or are you saying that a jet traveling at over 500 mph never got more than three feet off the ground and flew straight to the Pentagon?
|
|
monolith
climber
albany,ca
|
|
The pilot sets the descent rate on the autopilot. That's why they took simulator training and had manuals.
Once you know how the autopilot works, you can let it do all the work getting you in the right direction and to the right altitude.
They only traveled 500mph in the final straight approach. The turn was at 300mph.
|
|
Ghost
climber
A long way from where I started
|
|
I have no idea whether the Pentagon was hit by a 757, a missile, or a suicide squad of rabid hamsters.
But I can tell you, from personal experience, that taking a 757 down from cruising altitude and landing it right dead on target in the middle of a runway is not difficult, even for someone who has never piloted an airplane of any kind.
Again, I take no side in the battle among however many conspiracy theories are competing here, but I just want to point out that anyone who says it wouldn't be possible for people with little flight training to fly a 757 into the side of that building is wrong.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
I get the impression that Philo don't know how to fly airplanes. He is good at using the most usual truther talking points though.
One thing is that it is much easier to hit something if you do not care that much about the impact speed.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
Raymond, if you care to look, you will find many eye witnesses whose testimony you choose to ignore.
I am finally convinced. He only waited 5 years to come forward!
Why should anyone believe him more than the other eyewitnesses that came forward right after the attack? You claimed that testimonies where ignored when they didn't even came forward for 5 years. Should people have read there minds?
|
|
Reilly
Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
|
|
See, Philo, even a Ghost can fly a 757.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
Raymond, you obviously do not want to do any research on your own. There are many reports from eye witnesses who saw something very different from a 757 hit the Pentagon. I just showed one that was from someone from inside the Pentagon who knows how to identify planes. A very credible story that I knew you would choose to ignore (funny how I knew that before I even posted it).
I couldn't care less if you are convinced or not. It's your choice to believe what you want to. I'm just pointing out some facts--eye witnesses and other items, that show how the Official Story has many holes in it.
Holes larger than the one at the Pentagon.
OK, I really need to be off this thing.
Cheers,
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
Mahalo and aloha K-man
|
|
graniteclimber
Trad climber
The Illuminati -- S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Division
|
|
Philo,
Please stop buying into the "pilots for truth" slander. They are racists who say that the Syrian hamsters are ignorant stupid muslim AyRabs who can't a paperplane through a window, and would never be able to fly a plane as well as white Christian racists like themselves.
Hamsters are smart, even if they are from Syria. Steve Jobs was Syrian too, and no one called him stupid. The hamsters received training from the finest American flight schools. They are smarter than you.
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
|
|
Enough with your rodent love.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
I find it ironic that a person with an Illuminati avatar argues for the validity of the Official 9/11 Story.
Now back to your hamster jokes, they're funny.
|
|
graniteclimber
Trad climber
The Illuminati -- S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Division
|
|
Philo, a few hours on Microsoft Flight Simulator would probably suffice for hitting the Pentagon after the plane was established straight and
level. A phukking blind hamster could do it. It ain't rocket science!
What the f*#k does Reilly know? You'd almost think he is a pilot! Goddamn truth denier kaluless sheeple.
Philo, I have a Commercial Pilot's license and I'm here to tell you that once a large jet is off the ground it is arguably easier to fly than a Cessna. You don't even need to touch the pedals. They are designed to be incredibly stable. Landing one is a whole 'nother thing but those sickos didn't sign on for that. Your use of the phrase "high speed 270 degree diving and banking turn" just shows that you don't know what you're talking about. Any turn necessarily involves banking - no big deal. High speed is relative.
It would have been a high speed turn for a Ford Pinto but not a B-757.
Lastly, it was most definitely not a "diving turn". It was not that
much more radical than many a 'circle-to-land' approach or other common
approaches to many airports around the world. The standard approach to
Hong Kong's old Kai Tak Airport was a much more radical maneuver performed
dozens of times daily by 747's. Admittedly those were not flown by sickos,
for the most part*. Oh, and by the way, ever see the Pentagon in person?
Yeah, Helen Keller could hit that puppy. How the phuk could you miss it?
*If you go to YouTube and watch the myriad examples of landing at Kai Tak
then you will see why I qualified my statement.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
I just showed one that was from someone from inside the Pentagon who knows how to identify planes. A very credible story that I knew you would choose to ignore (funny how I knew that before I even posted it).
The witness was not inside pentagon in any way. He was just passing by and by coincidence got the important job of collecting the evidence.
I really hope that you are just trolling.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
"a complete stranger"
Just sayin'
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!