The Gun debate sandbox

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 2901 - 2920 of total 5891 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Ron Anderson

Trad climber
Soon to be Nipple suckling Liberal
Feb 17, 2013 - 05:06pm PT
damm yur an idiot.. ALL concealed weapon permit holders were accepted. They were comparing them with each other while waiting in line for an hour and a half. Better read more retard.. I was there. You just post like you know something. I was armed as were my buddies as was everyone else we talked with so really, hedgeworm GFYS with yur boyfriends fist and quit posting you bullsheet here. You know nothing of what you talking about. Your quote was meant for for sale guns as many brought them to the show to sell. By the THOUSANDS..NO one unloaded till INSIDE the room. (if that)
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Feb 17, 2013 - 06:28pm PT
Q: Can I carry a loaded gun in the gun show? I have a Concealed Carry Permit.
A: We respectfully request that you do not bring any loaded firearm into the gun show.

Apparently Ron and other gun "enthusiasts" disregard all requests... respectful or not.

They were comparing them with each other while waiting in line for an hour and a half.

Sounds kinda ghey.
Ron Anderson

Trad climber
Soon to be Nipple suckling Liberal
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:00pm PT
Sooo,, now CALI seeks to steal ALL semi auto weapons from its citizens..




(Before It's News) California legislators are in the process of rolling out what will be the strictest gun control laws in the country. Democrat state Legislatures rolled out a list of proposals that will instantly criminalize most of the state’s law abiding gun owners.

The new law would outlaw all semiautomatic weapons, criminalize anyone who has more than 500 rounds of ammo, and require a permit to buy ammunition in the future. California, which already has some of the strictest gun control laws in the country, is also looking at a proposal which would call for the immediate confiscation of 166,000 registered modern sporting rifles. This is why people are against Registration!

Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, unveiled the gun control package in a news conference Thursday at the state Capitol.



so say goodbye to Grandpas 22 semi auto,, and your glock, Baretta or any other semi auto gun.

Yep,, so it begins eh? And some said they werent going to go this far right! I know many a Californian hunter who will choose to be outlaws over a communist like rule and law. Just imagine everyone being disarmed in Compton, Richland, Sacto, LA, Oakland et al? Gonna be a gang land crime spree the likes youve never imagined.. All those folks ripe for the plucking.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:02pm PT
Modern Sporting Rifles. roflmao

Check yer facts, Ronduh. Only semi-auto rifles with detachable magazines would be banned, not all semi-auto guns.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:11pm PT
jesus, that story is over 10 days old.
Ron Anderson

Trad climber
Soon to be Nipple suckling Liberal
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:13pm PT
California legislators are in the process of rolling out what will be the strictest gun control laws in the country. Democrat state Legislatures rolled out a list of proposals that will instantly criminalize most of the state’s law abiding gun owners.
The new law would outlaw all semiautomatic weapons, criminalize anyone who has more than 500 rounds of ammo, and require a permit to buy ammunition in the future. California, which already has some of the strictest gun control laws in the country, is also looking at a proposal which would call for the immediate confiscation of 166,000 registered modern sporting rifles. This is why people are against Registration!
Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, unveiled the gun control package in a news conference Thursday at the state Capitol.
The package includes:
Banning the possession — not just manufacture and sale — of magazines holding more than 10 rounds.
Making possession of hollow point bullets and similar “assault bullets” a felony.
Requiring anyone wishing to buy ammunition to first get a permit by passing a background check.
Requiring the registration and reporting of all ammo purchases. Limits the number of rounds anyone can have at one time to 500 rounds.
Requiring all gun owners will have to be licensed like drivers, and will be forced to carry gun liability insurance.
Banning any gun that has a detachable magazine, and requires a 100% prohibition of all fixed magazines greater than 10 rounds.
Making all previous grandfathered magazines become illegal, and it will become a felony if you keep one.
Prohibiting anyone barred from owning a weapon from living in a home where weapons are kept
Expanding the list of crimes that would bar a person from gun possession.
Letting the state Justice Department use money from the state’s Dealer’s Record of Sale system to eliminate the backlog of people identified as no longer allowed to own guns but not yet investigated and contacted by law enforcement.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:15pm PT
That's great Ron, you have mastered the cut and paste from an undisclosed pro-gun website with little or no credibility. Congratulations.

Is it:

http://offgridsurvival.com/californiatobansemiautomaticguns-confiscatefirearms/

or

http://www.shotgunworld.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=95&t=337333&start=0

or perhaps

http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=3896276


Which all say the same thing, word for word, with nothing of substance to back it up. Just because y'all cut and paste it many times all over the intardweb doesn't make it true.
Ron Anderson

Trad climber
Soon to be Nipple suckling Liberal
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:25pm PT
I just love how they want to ban HOLLOW point ammo.. A critical factor in reducing collateral damage..Specifically used in self defense weaponry. I love how they will not grandfather ANYTHING in that was purchased LEGALLY at the time the purchases were made. WHY does anyone seek a gun registry and AMMO registry's?? For one reason only. To define those that have them for future use- like CONFISCATIONS..

Oddly enough, the FEDS have NEVER been interested in the style or capability of any weapons when authorizing a brady back ground check. All they ask for is "long gun" or "handgun".. They do NOT discern revolvers from semi autos. So now,, we have the FEDS setting idly by as states like CALI attempt to destroy the rights of its people under the 2nd amendment.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:28pm PT
If you say so. How many times can you be wrong on the same page?

Did you ever figure out that having an unloaded gun at a gun show is not the same as 'being armed'?
Ron Anderson

Trad climber
Soon to be Nipple suckling Liberal
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:33pm PT
Mono,, i take it you have never been to a gun show. And if you did,, you werent very observant.



and its DAMM FUNNY to see you caulifonians actually SUPPORTING THIS. How much more regulation can you guys get??

Ten years down the road your govt will be telling you which hand to wipe with..
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:34pm PT
I take it you can't read.

NO LOADED GUNS AT THE GUN SHOW

Q: Can I carry a loaded gun in the gun show? I have a Concealed Carry Permit.
A: We respectfully request that you do not bring any loaded firearm into the gun show.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:41pm PT
WHY does anyone seek a gun registry and AMMO registry's?? For one reason only. To define those that have them for future use- like CONFISCATIONS..

Yep. That's why they make you register your car, your boat, your dog, your bike, etc. When I register myself for classes or conferences or to vote I'm always worried they might try to confiscate me.

Oh, but wait... I just had a revelation... I think I see your point now... the reason guns are different is because they are the only thing keeping us free from Obama's tyrannical reign!!!! Good point! Hey, I bet if we have MORE guns we will be even MORE free.


Hey Ron, isn't that YOUR house down there?

Ron Anderson

Trad climber
Soon to be Nipple suckling Liberal
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:46pm PT
Nope,, if it was,, that drone would be on its way to a harsh impact after my 308 round pummeled it.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:47pm PT
Good boy. Nobody will ever think to take YOUR guns.
Ron Anderson

Trad climber
Soon to be Nipple suckling Liberal
Feb 18, 2013 - 03:57pm PT
NOTHING to hide here wessie.. Not one damm thing. I was LICENSED for firearms by the feds.



eidt: Now just think on your post for a minute wessie. You posted a pic of a drone, as if to suggest it being used AGAINST citizenry in the USA..Then you scoff at mention of tyrannical govt out of control. You seem a bit conflicted in yur efforts just to belittle me, and have in fact proven that is ALL you want to do here, unless,,, your actually THAT CONFLICTED in reality.

dave729

Trad climber
Western America
Feb 18, 2013 - 04:10pm PT
During those critical moments how can the weak resist the aggression of the strong? The only answer is with a gun.



hillrat

Trad climber
reno, nv
Feb 18, 2013 - 06:11pm PT
California already has a confiscation program in place, whereby they remove weapons from prohibited persons. It's not much of a jump to see that they could do the same for illegal weapons, once they decide what's legal to keep and what's not. I personally know someone who took in an "assault wepon" (as classified by CA, not a full-auto) to legally register it. They removed the sighting system, and when he said something they told him he's lucky they didn't charge him with a felony. Seems like a pretty arbitrary, subjective system. Not really how things should be at any level of government.

Colorado just passed some legislation; but I'm pretty lazy, so I'm not going to run out an read it. New York ought to be a laughingstock, really. They openly stated people will have to dispose of magazines over 7 rounds, either by turning them in or SELLING THEM OUT OF STATE. Hmmm..... weren't they one of those places that blames illegal guns on interstate commerce? Just sayin...

So really, if people like jghedge are out celebrating what MONSTROUS victories these are for the anti-gun crowd, I got news for you: you're as dumb as the politicians creating these kinds of f*#ked-up laws.

By the way, jghedge, have you realized how obsessed you are with the gun debate yet? Seriously.... obsessed.... You attack Ron for what you consider to be poor debate skills, yet you yourself are so absolutely incapable of seeing past your own hatred of all guns that you see no possible value in them, or reasonable ownership of them by private individuals. Whatever dude. The fringes never win.
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Feb 18, 2013 - 06:40pm PT
Right on CA.

Removing illegal weapons from felons is not a slippery slope.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Feb 18, 2013 - 06:46pm PT
Turning the majority into felons is!
Dave Kos

Social climber
Temecula
Feb 18, 2013 - 06:50pm PT
Turning the majority into felons is!

The majority of what?
Messages 2901 - 2920 of total 5891 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews