The Gun debate sandbox

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1901 - 1920 of total 4988 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Jan 20, 2013 - 07:41pm PT
"Whether he's elected or not, his mandate is to uphold and enforce the laws of the land, not interpret them as he sees fit."


That's The President's job, too. And he has a whole list of laws Congress passed that he says he won't be enforcing.
Crimpergirl

Sport climber
Boulder, Colorado!
Jan 20, 2013 - 07:43pm PT
Newtown truthers info. Pretty sad.

http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/15/newtown-families-targeted-intimidated/?hpt=hp_tvbx
tooth

Trad climber
B.C.
Jan 20, 2013 - 07:44pm PT
f a killer shoots 26 people in minutes, you think it should be kept quiet?


Only if it doesn't spawn more of the same behavior - like it does in the US. The point is to decrease the number of these incidences, not increase it. Stop feeding it through the media 24/7 and fix your gun laws. So far you haven't quit talking about it, and you can't get any gun laws changed because of your extreme views both from lobbyists and politicians. You seem to pick sides, call each other names, then do nothing. Pick a set of reasonable laws, there's nothing wrong with Canada's. Try them out for 10 years. See what effect it has compared to the last 10 years when you banned 'assault' weapons. But you would rather be picking sides, picking fights and picking your noses.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Jan 20, 2013 - 07:44pm PT
"They have this confirmation bias, as psychologists call it, to look for only evidence that supports their theories and disregard anything that says otherwise"
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
Jan 20, 2013 - 07:50pm PT
OK, use a signing statement. Or the plethora of other tools he has at his disposal to encourage things to happen. Sorry I used American Political terms incorrectly and the idea flew right over your heads.

Tooth, you clearly have no idea what constitutional power a US President has or has not

A "signing statement" CAN be added onto a bill passed by congress WHILE the President is signing it

get it yet?

ok, I'll try again: Congress would have to pass your bill banning the media from reporting on mass murders, THEN when the President signs it into law, he MIGHT add a signing statement "clarifying" something

You really don't understand how basic civics works, read a little, it won't hurt your head
tooth

Trad climber
B.C.
Jan 20, 2013 - 07:52pm PT
Norton, I don't have to learn your system. I know you have one, however you want to make the changes is fine with me. Until you learn Canada's, I'm not going to use the correct terminology for yours. But if that stops you from thinking about ideas or concepts, if you just hang out to type happy words on SuperTopo - have at it!




















Seems to me like the more this is kept on the front page in the US, the more guns are sold. The tension drives the sales, it is marketing 101 I learned years ago in my business degree. But you can't just have pro-gun discussions to create the tension that sells, you have to have the anti. However, you don't want smart anti, or you will affect sales. So hire a 10-year old to call people names and nit pick on stupid points to keep the discussions from getting either serious or effective. I'm pretty sure there are a few on here doing just that. Vulgar stupidity and name calling - creating tension, but going nowhere. You know who you are, what are they paying you?






Brilliant marketing.
Leggs

Sport climber
Home away from Home
Jan 20, 2013 - 09:52pm PT

the beautiful smith & wesson i inherited from my father. he told me about 9 months before he died unexpectedly in june that he wanted me to have it. we didn't know it would be so soon... it would be difficult to articulate how much this piece means to me.

Whoa... t*r... wow. I'm kind of speechless. Treasure it, yes. Always.

PS... that photo of you is f*#king badass. ~ xx
GhoulweJ

Trad climber
El Dorado Hills, CA
Jan 20, 2013 - 10:37pm PT
NY dems plead for repubs to not disclose the confiscation document...

http://www.thecommentator.com/article/2495/ny_democrat_pleads_with_republican_not_to_share_document_proposing_confiscation_of_guns
donini

Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
Jan 20, 2013 - 10:46pm PT
How can you hate guns? That's like hating a fire hydrant. Now certain, in fact a lot, of gun owners....now that is a different proposion, although "hate" is probably too strong of a word.
How about...vehemently disagree with.
GhoulweJ

Trad climber
El Dorado Hills, CA
Jan 20, 2013 - 11:01pm PT
On top of it all - no one is even trying to take away your guns!!

See link:

http://www.thecommentator.com/article/2495/ny_democrat_pleads_with_republican_not_to_share_document_proposing_confiscation_of_guns
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
mammoth lakes ca
Jan 20, 2013 - 11:07pm PT
Riley...You are correct..It's all about image and brain washing....Find issues that the pussies are freaked out about , like lawn bowling or male pattern baldness and exploit that paranoia so that the pussies dig in and become indignant about the nigger taking away their constitutional rights to bowl on lawns and wear rugs... then watch their corporate chosen grease ball run for president and promise to save lawn bowling and their right to wear hair pieces... then watch the corporate sponsors sneak their hidden agendas thru congress like tax breaks for the 1% so that the morons who suddenly crave wigs and green lawns have to pay higher taxes and can't afford wigs or lawns....Works like a charm every 4 years...
GhoulweJ

Trad climber
El Dorado Hills, CA
Jan 20, 2013 - 11:24pm PT
Kos,
I hear ya about the commentator. They clearly search out info for the beliefs.

BUT...... Watch the video (scroll down the link I posted)...
Dropline

Mountain climber
Somewhere Up There
Jan 21, 2013 - 10:20am PT
We have smartphones. Why don't we make smart guns?

As universal background checks are something pretty much everyone agrees on why not assign individual guns to individual people who have passed background checks and then design the guns so they will only fire in the hand of that individual. Electronic fingerprint identification is pretty common and pretty cheap now. It could easily be incorporated into guns.

Background checks, and smartgun fingerprint or palm print identification would seem to solve the mass murder by gun problem and perhaps still pass 2nd amendment muster.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Jan 21, 2013 - 04:17pm PT
dropline, your perfectly reasonable solution to this problem is unacceptable. Our founding fathers did not have smart muskets, therefore any kind of technological advances applied to firearms are unconstitutional.
philo

Trad climber
Is that light the end of the tunnel or a train?
Jan 22, 2013 - 10:10am PT
Toker Villain

Big Wall climber
Toquerville, Utah
Feb 3, 2013 - 01:29pm PT
Your point Riley?

What a tragedy! And with the vehicle theft this looks like a straight up robbery/ homicide.

The comments after the article illustrate just how clueless (not to mention heartless) many anti-gun libs are.

I am, quite frankly, surprised and insulted by your broad brush indictments.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Feb 3, 2013 - 01:31pm PT
If only someone there had a gun and knew how to use it...


More guns make us more safer.
Ed Hartouni

Trad climber
Livermore, CA
Feb 3, 2013 - 02:14pm PT
Strange that this thread should surface, I wasn't going to post to bring it to the top page, but I was just reading a "News & Analysis" piece in last week's Science (25 January), title: "Gun Control Agenda Is A Call to Duty for Scientists"

This piece recalls that Congress had successfully withdrawn funding studies by the CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) and the NIH (National Institute for Health) in the 1990s. Congressman Jay Dickey had the CDC budget cut by $2.6M, the "precise amount of the research budget" for gun violence.

1996 legislation prohibited research that might "advocate or promote gun control." From that date to 2010 academic papers on gun violence fell 60%, and this lack of direct research support was compounded by legislation that restricted collection and access to gun related crime data by the Department of Justice. (The Tiahrt Amendments).

While there seems to be some debate in this thread about the research, it is important to note that research has been greatly impeded by Congress.

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6118/381.summary
Chaz

Trad climber
greater Boss Angeles area
Feb 3, 2013 - 02:26pm PT
How did the government gain control over what is researched, and what is not researched?

If you answered "Because the government finances it", then go to the head of the class.

If you want things to be done freely and independently, get the government - and its money - OUT.
mechrist

Gym climber
South of Heaven
Feb 3, 2013 - 02:32pm PT
Chaz, face the facts... more guns make us more safer. If it weren't for all those qualified gun owners with guns at that shooting range it could have turned out as bad as Sandy Hook.

When a tragic shooting involving innocent children occurs at a school, the pro-gun response is ARM THE TEACHERS... ARMED GUARDS... IT HAPPENED BECAUSE IT WAS A GUN FREE ZONE.

When it happens at shooting range, with expert marksmen, it is tragic... with apparently no solution.
Messages 1901 - 1920 of total 4988 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta