Every time you post, I roll my eyes and say "Christ"
Not because you're giving me an orgasm, you silly goose, but because you find little things like "then" and "than" to try and deflate my level of intelligence.
Incoming "What intelligence?"
If that is the sort of language that will get me accused of domestic terrorism, than it's already a tyrannical government.
What makes the threats of civil war by Alex Jones or any of the other nuts any different than those of Awlaki?
Awlaki joined a known terrorist organization.
Awlaki indirectly attacked American Citizens.
Alex Jones YELLS A LOT AND SAYS A LOT OF STUFF BUT IS NOT IN VIOLATION OF ANYTHING. Freedom of Speech, First Amendment, which brings us to;
It's a sad day, that morons like you, aren't restricted on internet access.
Right... because fuk the 1st amendment, we'll just skip to the second. I really hope for your sake that was intentional irony.
;) There are no restriction on him, because of the First Amendment, where there are already hundreds of restrictions on the Second Amendment across the Country.
You wouldn't be here as a free man, if it weren't for a bunch of "children in men's body with gun fetishisms'."
Know what the Minute Men are?
In World War II, my Great Grandfather got called to grab his rifle and go to the Capitol Street Bridge in Sacramento and be on watch for Japanese boats/submarines coming up the river.
Japanese halted the attacks after Pearl Harbor, even when they knew that there was no Navy between them and the rest of the US Soils. They knew that behind every door was a rifle.
Jg, are you trying to change the mind of a gunNUT? You know that's not possible, right? You know about the operation they've all had? Seen the zipper on the back of their neck?
Japanese halted the attacks after Pearl Harbor, even when they knew that there was no Navy between them and the rest of the US Soils. They knew that behind every door was a rifle.
Funny, I was thinking the same thing. Glad there is at least one adult around here.
Japanese halted the attacks after Pearl Harbor, even when they knew that there was no Navy between them and the rest of the US Soils. They knew that behind every door was a rifle.
Fantasies are fun.
I don't fantasize about that happening. That would mean I couldn't go climbing. Just stating some history. Know any?
There are no restriction on him, because of the First Amendment
Ah, but there are restrictions. There are certain things people shouldn't say, for the good of society, and they can't say without consequences. Why can't you accept there are guns people just shouldn't have, for the good of society?
You can't say you are going to "start shooting people" if you don't get your way. This guy found out and had his gun rights stripped... as it should be... he can't even control his anger in with a VIDEO CAMERA... god forbid he loses control with a gun... and he's a fuking instructor.
He took the video down, edited it, and took back some of what he said. He can take back his words... he can't take back his bullets.
Do you gun nuts actually think our founding fathers would ignorantly rant about "shooting people?" Sooooo far out of touch.
There is a different mindset amongst people in that community. I have a few friends who personally know James Yeager, who are VERY conservative, very pro gun, who think he's bat sh#t insane. Don't let one speak for all.
Thanks Chaz. Glad I didn't have to Google it though. Glad my elementary school education is still retained in my child like zipper head.
Bought my guide book, off to get some sleep for some flailing tomorrow.
They were not afraid to go against our military, why the hell would they fear pea shooters. They savagely went after any insurgent activity, including going after innocent civilians.
James has plenty of experience shooting guns, from all different positions and situations. He's a VERY EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTOR.
How is what Chaz wrote make him a sucker?
Facts are there. Why else would they have stopped? They toppled our only Navy in the Pacific (Aside from our Carriers which moved to a different location right before the attack).
Sorry for the wandering post, but regarding the Bill of Rights, and the concept that the 2nd amendment is there so the people can defend themselves against a tyrannical government, it is quite clear that in today's world citizens fighting with small arms against our military is not a viable option (I think though that this is more about food and water than the weapons.) But, a government which supports the responsible ownership and use of arms is a government which respects and has trust in the people.
It is not a question of whether or not there is a "concept" there, what is written is what there is... and it doesn't say anything about rebellion or tyranny... or about individuals defending such or the "trust" of the government in the people...
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
where is there talk of tyranny, rebellion or individuals?
It's "We the People..." not "Me the Person..." after all...
Isoroku Yamamoto ( he was the Commander-in-Chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy during World War II )
Let us know!