Why are Republicans Wrong about Everything?

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 43481 - 43500 of total 45428 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
fluffy

Trad climber
Colorado
Jun 24, 2014 - 11:44am PT
"They only reason he got elected was the color of his skin the only reason for his approval ratings is the color of his skin."

And you're butt hurt about condescension.

Btw just substitute 'woman' for 'black' and you're all ready to go for the next 8.
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM
Jun 24, 2014 - 11:45am PT
Sketch...There are 8,861 bills and resolutions currently before the United States Congress. Of those, only about 5% will become law. They must be enacted before the end of the 2013-2015 session (the “113th Congress”).


Keep on defending the losers Sketch. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/07/17/the-least-productive-congress-ever/
Ward Trotter

Trad climber
Jun 24, 2014 - 11:48am PT
Looks like the Dem's and Hillary are going to have to win without the old, angry, white guy vote. Oh well.

Hillary's problem in becoming the next President is much, much deeper than angry,old white
guys---it boils down to one angry black dude, Mr. Epic Failure, the founder of Al-quaeda-stan.
And of course her own perennially disgusting personality ,phoniness, and shameless money-grubbing.

Add to that the historical reality of a party keeping the Presidency after 8 years. It's only happened once in my lifetime---when Bush continued the Reagan Presidency.
The American people do not want 8 more years of Obama in the form of the unholy Clintons--trust me on this.
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM
Jun 24, 2014 - 11:51am PT
Suck on this Ward and Sketch. The only good news for Obama, NBC News reported, was that “he looks like the homecoming king compared with the Republican Party.” The GOP had only a 29 percent favorable rating with the public, while 45 percent viewed them unfavorably.

Republicans have earned such dismal ratings.



Read more: http://thehill.com/opinion/juan-williams/210187-williams-congress-defaults-to-duck-and-cover#ixzz35aHBn5su
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Jun 24, 2014 - 11:51am PT
Even if that were true, isn't it sad that the Repub's don't have anyone that can beat them? What does that tell you?
Ward Trotter

Trad climber
Jun 24, 2014 - 11:58am PT
Republicans have earned such dismal ratings.

I agree. Republicans are a divided Party without any real leadership , much like the Demlibs were in the 80s.
Even the core of the Republican party are unhappy with the muted inability of leading Republicans to show leadership and to effectively articulate opposition to the disastrous policies of Demlibs.
This state of affairs is reflected in these polls---not so much the policies of Republicans are being rejected but rather their conspicuous inability to effectively push back against Obama and the socialist left.

This is all coupled with the incapacity of national Conservatives to draw a valid distinction between their policies and foundational values and those of the historically discredited radical left. This has produced a vacuum which has allowed the Left to define Republicans in their own distorted way---replete with all the redneck, racist, homophobe , women-hating caricatures ---straight out of the radical SDS literature of the 60s-70s.
In addition , the Demlibs currently control much of the pop culture narrative.

This will all change sometime in the future.

Besides, the Demlibs are driven by the generational thinking and collective personality of the baby boomer 60s-70s Left---this is a politically radicalized generation that will soon be retiring from senior positions in the culture; and its power and values will diminish.
This is why Obama is trying to pack poor dependent third worlders into the country ---to give the Democrat Party some kind of enduring base.
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM
Jun 24, 2014 - 12:11pm PT
Sketch & Ward have a really distorted way of looking at things. Obama's ratings range from the low-to high 40's, the republicans rating are in the low to mid 20's but for some strange way of thinking Obama is a disaster and the republicans are better.
Sketch

Trad climber
H-ville
Jun 24, 2014 - 12:23pm PT
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM

Jun 24, 2014 - 11:45am PT
Sketch...There are 8,861 bills and resolutions currently before the United States Congress. Of those, only about 5% will become law. They must be enacted before the end of the 2013-2015 session (the “113th Congress”).

Keep on defending the losers Sketch. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/07/17/the-least-productive-congress-ever/

I'm not "defending any losers".

I'm just pointing out that you are full of sh#t... yet again.

You're out of your league.
Sketch

Trad climber
H-ville
Jun 24, 2014 - 12:27pm PT
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM

Jun 24, 2014 - 11:51am PT
Suck on this Ward and Sketch. The only good news for Obama, NBC News reported, was that “he looks like the homecoming king compared with the Republican Party.” The GOP had only a 29 percent favorable rating with the public, while 45 percent viewed them unfavorably.

Republicans have earned such dismal ratings.

Hey Bob Duh - why did you leave out:

The president’s overall approval rating in the poll was tied for his lowest of all time at 41 percent.

Is 41 considered mid-high 40s?
Sketch

Trad climber
H-ville
Jun 24, 2014 - 12:38pm PT
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM

Jun 24, 2014 - 12:11pm PT
Sketch & Ward have a really distorted way of looking at things. Obama's ratings range from the low-to high 40's, the republicans rating are in the low to mid 20's but for some strange way of thinking Obama is a disaster and the republicans are better.

Distorted? You mean factually? Low to high 40s? Sure thing sport. Looking at the last 10 polls at RealClearPolitics, one poll gives him a 46, two are in the thirties (including a 36) and the average is 41... yet you seem to think this equates to mid-high 40s.

You keep trying to compare Obama's numbers to Republicans in Congress. It's a stupid comparison. No doubt the GOP in Congress has crappy numbers. So do the Dems in Congress.

Congress has historically low numbers. Dismal numbers. But they don't just apply to the Republicans.

Oh yeah... where have I said (or even implied) that the Republican's approval numbers are good... or better than Obama's?
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM
Jun 24, 2014 - 12:59pm PT
Sketch wrote: Oh yeah... where have I said (or even implied) that the Republican's approval numbers are good... or better than Obama's?


So if Obama's rating are so bad but fifteen to twenty percent points higher than the other options (republicans)what point are you trying to make about his performance?


He (Obama) has a higher approval rating than the: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/supreme_court_update

fluffy

Trad climber
Colorado
Jun 24, 2014 - 01:00pm PT
demilib

Makes you sound like an idiot, FYI

As does -----tard, 'billary' etc.

I'm guessing these are adopted from some pundit windbag, as are your talking points.

It's ugly when folks can't think for themselves.
Sketch

Trad climber
H-ville
Jun 24, 2014 - 01:04pm PT
That his approval numbers are historically low FOR PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL RATINGS!!!

You quoted a Juan Williams piece. Did you miss the part about "The president’s overall approval rating in the poll was tied for his lowest of all time at 41 percent"?

Again, where have I said (or even implied) that the Republican's approval numbers are good... or better than Obama's?
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM
Jun 24, 2014 - 01:09pm PT
Dumbass wrote: You quoted a Juan Williams piece. Did you miss the part about "The president’s overall approval rating in the poll was tied for his lowest of all time at 41 percent"?


He has much higher ratings than House, Senate and Supreme Court justices, you should be a little more concern with their performance as they are ones who actually pass/defeat laws/bills.
dirtbag

climber
Jun 24, 2014 - 01:09pm PT
That his ratings are above 40% is due to the rock solid support he gets from the black population due to the color of his skin .

If the black population were split on Obama like the rest of the American people his polled ratings would be in the low 30s, if that high.
He gets a major bump because his skin is dark.

bTW I can't remember the last time Obama has polled approval in the "high 40s"
Nor can I remember his disapprovals drop anywhere below 49---at any time in the last 2 years.

Gallup today has Obama at 42 approval 53 disapproval

Two reasons why it's even that high:
--Overwhelming Black support
--- No daily drumbeat criticism from the majority of the mainstream media




African Americans overwhelmingly vote democratic. Period. African Americans overwhelmingly supported Clinton too.

What color was his skin?

And your bitching about the supposed "liberal media" is tiresome and untrue. Find something else to whine about.
Sketch

Trad climber
H-ville
Jun 24, 2014 - 01:20pm PT
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM

Jun 24, 2014 - 01:09pm PT

Dumbass wrote: You quoted a Juan Williams piece. Did you miss the part about "The president’s overall approval rating in the poll was tied for his lowest of all time at 41 percent"?

He has much higher ratings than House, Senate and Supreme Court justices, you should be a little more concern with their performance as they are ones who actually pass/defeat laws/bills.

So now it's Dumbass, eh?

What's the matter? Is wittle Bobby getting gwumpy, for having his stupidity pointed out time after time after time???

Those ratings aren't really relevant to the fact that Obama's approval numbers suck ass.

This isn't a zero sum game.

Again, where have I said (or even implied) that the Republican's approval numbers are good... or better than Obama's?
Dr. F.

Trad climber
SoCal
Topic Author's Reply - Jun 24, 2014 - 01:23pm PT
Ward is so far out in right field that I can't even think of a response to his opinion about liberals

Obviously he read or heard all this crap somewhere and truly believes it
Was it Mark Levin?
kind of sounds like it to me, rewriting history and making crazy baseless claims about liberals is his stchit
peladob

Mountain climber
Mason City, Iowa
Jun 24, 2014 - 01:23pm PT
this is an amusing thread for sure.

we sit here bitching about 40% approval ratings, not at all considering the fact that both parties are full of carreer politic jokers that would sell their own mothers before sitting down and voting for a piece of legistlation that would help our nation....

....that shits's way too dangerous....

.....we can't threaten to take away guns/food stamps/illegal residence/union rights/marriage rights/right to be morons if we are getting along and voting together.

this country deserves the Kardashians it worships. we live on pointless drama, and the nimrods we vote into office will play that fiddle til the strings break.
Dingus Milktoast

Gym climber
Maestro, Ecosystem Ministry, Fatcrackistan
Jun 24, 2014 - 01:23pm PT
That his ratings are above 40% is due to the rock solid support he gets from the black population due to the color of his skin .

If the black population were split on Obama like the rest of the American people his polled ratings would be in the low 30s, if that high.
He gets a major bump because his skin is dark.

You're projecting your republican values again.

Blacks make up 13% of the voting population. So your math skills suck too.


DMT
Sketch

Trad climber
H-ville
Jun 24, 2014 - 01:23pm PT
dirtbag

climber

Jun 24, 2014 - 01:09pm PT

African Americans overwhelmingly vote democratic. Period. African Americans overwhelmingly supported Clinton too.

What color was his skin?

Wasn't Clinton the "First Black President"?
Messages 43481 - 43500 of total 45428 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews