Why are Republicans Wrong about Everything?

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 20561 - 20580 of total 43859 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
CrackAddict

Trad climber
Canoga Park, CA
May 24, 2012 - 04:49pm PT
"Compare this with Government spending in the U.S. at 39% of GDP and RISING."

And all of those countries have socialized health care and cradle to grave social programs

So does the U.S. to some degree, so what? These countries have had to cut the size of Government, including the programs you mention. And their economies are much more robust for it.
CrackAddict

Trad climber
Canoga Park, CA
May 24, 2012 - 04:52pm PT
Crack wrote: Our politicians/republicans set the rate very high and then republicans sell exemptions to the corporations that pay to keep them in office.


Fixed that for you.


Thanks for making that clear. In light of your clarification, I was a little confused by this picture though:

Credit: CrackAddict

Incidentally, I wonder why all the uproar about a couple Billion dollars lost by traders at JPM (the bank's own money) when there was no backlash at all when Corzine STOLE a couple Billion from his investors. Corzine has not been charged with anything - I guess that is the perk of being an Obama contributor.
fattrad

Mountain climber
GOP Convention
May 24, 2012 - 04:53pm PT
Hedge,

All of those countries are cutting back on health and cradle to grave. I've already posted the links.



TheTool
philo

Trad climber
Somewhere halfway over the rainbow
May 24, 2012 - 04:55pm PT
And you're ALWAYS WRONG!
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM
May 24, 2012 - 05:01pm PT
Crack...I see where you get your information. Birds of a feather...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2yOVwDq7kY
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM
May 24, 2012 - 05:02pm PT
Crack wrote: I guess that is the perk of being an Obama contributor.

I guess you are wrong.
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
May 24, 2012 - 05:03pm PT
you are nauseatingly and relentlessly stupid
jghedge

climber
May 24, 2012 - 05:15pm PT
"All of those countries are cutting back on health and cradle to grave. I've already posted the links."

Hahahahaha, wrong, caught lying again.

Show me one link that shows social programs that actually have been cut, not "are cutting back". It's pointless, no private program can provide those services more efficiently than the gov't can, and without them, society collapses. How did the socialist just get elected president of France? By promising to cut social programs?

You've failed again.

And now you'll post a link that disproves your point, but, of course, you're too stupid to realize that the link you post contradicts you.

Sooo entertaining.
Dave Kos

Trad climber
Temecula
May 24, 2012 - 05:22pm PT
Have y'all seen this?

From a reputable non-partisan fact-check organization:

President Barack Obama has actually presided over the smallest increases in federal spending of any recent president.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/may/23/facebook-post-gets-it-right-about-obamas-record-sp/
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
May 24, 2012 - 05:24pm PT
I think Crack was looking for that information earlier


but since it proves his narrative wrong, he will probably question its country of birth
HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
May 24, 2012 - 05:31pm PT
This is because the Canadian rate is flatter, i.e. there are fewer loopholes. Our politicians set the rate very high and then sell exemptions to the corporations that pay to keep them in office


Every now and then CA gets it right. Although that's only a small piece of the economic puzzle.

These countries have had to cut the size of Government, including the programs you mention
Factually correct.

And their economies are much more robust for it.
That is currently a topic of strenuous debate in the EU. OECD has just published a report that many of the countries have already gone too far in social cuts. Taking money out of people's pockets and strangling demand for goods and services.

At least up to this point, the EU deficit debates have been largely polite and argued on legitimate grounds of economics and social justice.
Unlike here, where corporations Rule and the politicians (especially Boner/Meathead/CantDo) practice "strangle the other party and the people be damned"
Doesn't help that all the Republitards (including in the California legislature) have signed Grover Norquist's No New Taxes pledge
Bob D'A

Trad climber
Taos, NM
May 24, 2012 - 05:34pm PT
Crack is a cherry picker...only when it suits his rants.


Four more years of Obama...digest that!
CrackAddict

Trad climber
Canoga Park, CA
May 24, 2012 - 05:38pm PT
Show me one link that shows social programs that actually have been cut, not "are cutting back". It's pointless, no private program can provide those services more efficiently than the gov't can, and without them, society collapses. How did the socialist just get elected president of France? By promising to cut social programs?

How on Earth would Canada cut 40% of its government spending and NOT cut social programs? Are you smoking more Datura?

And no, society does not collapse when social programs are cut. Did society collapse after Clinton reformed welfare in the 90s?
jghedge

climber
May 24, 2012 - 05:44pm PT
"How on Earth would Canada cut 40% of its government spending and NOT cut social programs? Are you smoking more Datura?"

Then it should be that much easier to post the facts that show that, right?

What's Datura?

CrackAddict

Trad climber
Canoga Park, CA
May 24, 2012 - 05:44pm PT
Have y'all seen this?

From a reputable non-partisan fact-check organization:

President Barack Obama has actually presided over the smallest increases in federal spending of any recent president.

We have been talking about this since yesterday. Here is the corollary:

Obama spends as if the 2008 emergency were permanent

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304840904577422452374106994.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

HighTraverse

Trad climber
Bay Area
May 24, 2012 - 05:45pm PT
society does not collapse when social programs are cut.
All depends on the economic context at the time.
When Clinton cut welfare benefits the economy was doing very well. After he'd been in office a full term and a couple of years before the Tech Bubble burst.

Cutting government jobs and welfare benefits now would slow the economic recovery, besides being cruel to many who are out of work through no fault of their own.
jghedge

climber
May 24, 2012 - 05:46pm PT
"And no, society does not collapse when social programs are cut. Did society collapse after Clinton reformed welfare in the 90s?"

Hahahaha, please go ahead and explain for us what that actually "reformed".
CrackAddict

Trad climber
Canoga Park, CA
May 24, 2012 - 05:47pm PT
"How on Earth would Canada cut 40% of its government spending and NOT cut social programs? Are you smoking more Datura?"

Then it should be that much easier to post the facts that show that, right?

What's Datura?

Jimson weed, grows in Joshua Tree.

Anyway, Canada spends ALL its money on social programs. Their military budget is smaller than that of the Boy Scouts in the U.S. - what else are they going to spend money on??
locker

Gym climber
DUH!!!...
May 24, 2012 - 05:47pm PT


"Deadly Nightshade"...

CrackAddict

Trad climber
Canoga Park, CA
May 24, 2012 - 05:50pm PT
Cutting government jobs and welfare benefits now would slow the economic recovery, besides being cruel to many who are out of work through no fault of their own.


The "Recovery" is already moving like a turd in the sun.

So do you think the Soviet Union should have kept all of it's government jobs? They did have 100% employment, so they were doing quite well, right?
Messages 20561 - 20580 of total 43859 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
Gear Finder
Go
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews