Politics, God and Religion vs. Science

The assertion, in all cases, assumes that the "proof" of purported truths must be defined by criteria particular to its very own camp.

without God it is a vacuum/void

it was created for and meant to be filled. and it yearns to be filled.

Or is this another attempt to insist that infinite qualities stand up like men and show themselves so our discursive mind and get hold of them and render judgement.

Who do you know who has gotten fruit from such an approach? No one I've ever heard about.

It's interesting to guess what kind of experiences a person must have had to arrive at these conclusions, of whether he too, has tried to imagine or think his way to said conclusions, as opposed to making the effort to do something. Also, I would wager that the word "imagined" refers to some "thing" or entity which the mind cooked up to sate existential fear - that's the party line. And it's way off base.

...infinite qualities...

Good answer, but that wasn't really the thrust of my question. Have you "seen" in four dimensions, or have you "seen" the particle-wave duality? I threw in the drug stuff as examples of perceiving things that were beyond normal experience, but I am more interested in things on the frontier of science that seem to defy normal logic.

Thanks anyway.

Anytime the spiritually oriented try to define what they mean, instead of listening, the science types quickly dismiss their ideas as inferior by the criteria the science types themselves set up. Thus no real communication takes place.