Politics, God and Religion vs. Science

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
Messages 13361 - 13380 of total 22344 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
MikeL

climber
SANTA CLARA, CA
Apr 13, 2013 - 02:33pm PT
Base, . . . and you're the guy who wants to know how to meditate? Dude, you're already there. Those moments are all that you ever have.

(Cintune, that was pretty darned funny.)

It's the source of consciousness that completely baffles the mundane materialist mental speculators .......

Me, too. I have a belief, but it's irrelevant. No belief is true.
Jingy

climber
Somewhere out there
Apr 13, 2013 - 03:19pm PT
http://www.politicususa.com/calling-newtown-parents-human-shields-rush-limbaugh.html


After Calling Newtown Parents Human Shields, Rush Limbaugh Has Got To Go

By: Jason EasleyApr. 12th, 2013more from Jason Easley

After referring to the parents of Newtown’s 20 murdered children as human shields, it’s time for Rush Limbaugh to go.

Audio via Media Matters:
http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/04/12/limbaugh-democrats-are-using-newtown-parents-as/193608

Transcript via Rush Limbaugh:

LIMBAUGH: Now I got a guy who calls me, “Rush, are they registered lobbyists?”
“Where’s your heart, sir? What do you mean? They’re not lobbying! They’re trying to save other people’s children.” So that’s how it works. It was the president who asked for this mother of a six-year-old who died to do his speech. Senator Richard Blumenthal (Democrat-Connecticut) is using Sandy Hook to raise money in his e-mails. They’re trying to turn the Newtown parents into a dozen Sandy Sheehans in a way. It’s what the Democrats do, folks. They always try to hide their agendas behind women and children, and, most of all, victims. So the Newtown parents are human shields, in a sense.
The Newtown parents are out there to protect the Democrats from any criticism and to shut it down. Pure and simple.


Being controversial is Limbaugh’s gimmick. It is how he stays relevant, but referring to parents who lost their children in a horrific mass shooting as human shields goes too far. It is wrong when Limbaugh does his daily dredging through the pit of racism for ratings. It was wrong when he called Sandra Fluke a slut. Rush Limbaugh is, as a rule of thumb, usually wrong when he opens his mouth.

However, this is a new low even for him.

Since the Republican Party is too weak kneed and gutless to do anything about him, the rest of America has to take a stand. It would be nice to believe that if we ignore Limbaugh he will go away, but the left has been trying this strategy for decades, and the right wing talker’s influence has only grown within the Republican Party.

The advertiser boycott that was ignited by Limbaugh’s slut comments has been hugely successful, but his comments about the Newtown parents should motivate those who believe in decency to redouble their efforts.

Rush Limbaugh has First Amendment rights, but We The People also have the right to refuse to give our business to anyone who advertises on Rush Limbaugh’s show. The advertiser boycott has cost Limbaugh millions, but since he has learned nothing, it looks like it is time for another lesson.



You Limbag republitards need a whole new way of thinking. Painfully outdated is your best argument 'for' this the of ignorance.
Ward Trotter

Trad climber
Apr 13, 2013 - 04:36pm PT
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are trolling on the wrong Dr. F thread.

Just trying to be helpful.

These threads need a GPS locator.
BASE104

Social climber
An Oil Field
Apr 13, 2013 - 04:50pm PT
MikeL,

I've tried to explain these types of experiences as something special. Some people never get there. Most people just shut down and wake up when it is over, while others think slowly through it.

When it just washes over you, faster than an orgasm (and not pleasant like an orgasm), all that is left is a raw awareness.

Largo, when I used to watch you guys soloing right behind each other all over Intersection Rock and around the area on a circuit, I have to ask this.

Were you thinking or where you doing?

There is a big difference. When you are leading, you think about the rope and clipping a piece of pro. That stuff gets in the way for me.

I would get that feeling soloing sometimes, and it didn't even have to be particularly hard. Other times we would be chatting away and the climbing was just like making breakfast or something. Automatic.

Doing a long delay BASE jump just hits you like a gigantic magnet just wiped your hard drive. You just do, and you don't have to think. If you are jumping with a buddy, and he tracks right while I track left, that is about the only thing. It really feels like falling. El Cap is so freaking big that it El Cap tower comes up verrrryyy slowly.

With the wingsuits, it must be highly addictive to folks like me who get gratification from those experiences.

I might get scared before or after, but when doing, it is sort of like the mind is downloading pure reality. No thought gets in the way.

I just tried to stop thinking for about five minutes. Couldn't do it.
BASE104

Social climber
An Oil Field
Apr 13, 2013 - 05:35pm PT
I also don't totally buy this dichotomy of subjective vs objective hard line. Experience itself is a huge topic, and not every one falls into a tidy category.

Thought, experience, action, it all begins and ends in the brain. It all dies with the brain. On that matter, the question is settled for me.

It has nothing to do with the type or quality of the experience, though. That is what is interesting.

Feel free to donate your meat brains to science next week. Let's see how well you do without them.
BASE104

Social climber
An Oil Field
Apr 13, 2013 - 05:38pm PT
WTF Jinghy? That post is either in the wrong home or needs a good explanation. Nothing that we are discussing is political. It is just nature.

Would someone PLEASE tell me why dolphins don't get to go to heaven, or even why we place our species on a pedestal? The firmament beneath that pedestal is probably pretty shaky.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Apr 13, 2013 - 09:01pm PT
I also think that you are all being incredibly short sighted by placing Man in some special category. You can study consciousness by observing animals who possess the quality to some extent or other.

nice to see some one else agreeing on that crucial point

Cotton Top Tamarins
Cotton Top Tamarins
Credit: TomCochrane

Largo

Sport climber
The Big Wide Open Face
Apr 13, 2013 - 09:11pm PT
I also think that you are all being incredibly short sighted by placing Man in some special category. You can study consciousness by observing animals who possess the quality to some extent or other.


What's short sighted perhaps is the lack of acknowledging that qualitative differences in consciousness can make the difference between writing sonnets and splitting atoms, and eating leaves and walking around naked. Value judgments like "better" and "special" are very fluid terms.

JL
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Apr 13, 2013 - 09:43pm PT
What's short sighted perhaps is the lack of acknowledging that qualitative differences in consciousness can make the difference between writing sonnets and splitting atoms, and eating leaves and walking around naked. Value judgments like "better" and "special" are very fluid terms.

if you really spend time with some of these other creatures, you will come to understand why they often regard sonnet writers and atom splitters as incredibly lacking in awareness of their surroundings

there are many creatures who are constantly watching humans without themselves ever being seen by a human

when was the last time you saw a weasel? or a fox? or even a deer that didn't intentionally present itself to you?

there is a dramatic awareness differential between tightly focused attention and wide vision awareness

you can see it in their eyes

people whose minds are constantly busy processing interior thoughts tend to lack awareness of their surroundings

witness the dramatic increase in cell phone induced injuries
MH2

climber
Apr 13, 2013 - 10:33pm PT
if you really spend time with some of these other creatures, you will come to understand why they often regard sonnet writers and atom splitters as incredibly lacking in awareness of their surroundings


If I remember rightly it has a lot to do with humans not hearing steps behind them and having no sense of smell.

But the dog may remember Man after he has gone.

The Policeman's Prophecy
Lord Dunsany
MH2

climber
Apr 13, 2013 - 10:38pm PT
What's short sighted perhaps is the lack of acknowledging that qualitative differences in consciousness can make the difference between writing sonnets and splitting atoms, and eating leaves and walking around naked. Value judgments like "better" and "special" are very fluid terms.


Tom may not be using 'special' as a value judgement but rather to mean a thing which is readily distinguishable from other things.
WBraun

climber
Apr 13, 2013 - 10:55pm PT
The human being is the springboard for further advancement.

The animal is only fixed up in it's nature.

The human being can go up or down in it's evolution according to the consciousness it develops in this life.

When human being only acts in animal consciousness in this life one will fall down and become animal in next life.

Foolish modern so called human rascals think due to poor fund of knowledge there's only one life.

Thus they act like cats, dogs, and monkeys in this life and fall down and are reborn in those animal bodies in their next life.

The human being stage is very rare to come to.

Do not waste it on animal consciousness.

Human beings are meant for knowledge not animalistic consciousness ......
MH2

climber
Apr 13, 2013 - 11:02pm PT
Unless the animal is handy at chess.
WBraun

climber
Apr 14, 2013 - 12:05am PT
Where you see animal play chess?

Chess is kings game.

Animal too stupid.....
Ward Trotter

Trad climber
Apr 14, 2013 - 12:26am PT
Credit: Ward Trotter

Chess is boring!
Chess is boring!
Credit: Ward Trotter
Largo

Sport climber
The Big Wide Open Face
Apr 14, 2013 - 12:26am PT

Tom may not be using 'special' as a value judgement but rather to mean a thing which is readily distinguishable from other things.


Exactly so. For some here, they cannot readily distinguish the qualitative difference between an acorn, say, and the feeling of fear. Or they feel for reasons of facile evaluation that all phenomenon are fundamentally the same.

JL
splitter

Trad climber
Cali Hodad, surfing the galactic plane ~:~
Apr 14, 2013 - 12:40am PT
With wingsuits, it must be highly addictive...

this dood fits the bill...

^ defines 'pushing the limits' of proximity flying, imho!
WBraun

climber
Apr 14, 2013 - 12:51am PT
To what is base wing suit mans credit.

The bird already does.

Base wing suit man is imitator of bird.

Bird does better at flying.

Base wing suit man in next life will devolve and become bird.

Wasted his human life.

But base wing suit man will say due to poor fund of knowledge.

"Human life sucked for me therefore I now happy bird."

But now no more good brain arms legs and must only eat worm with beak .....
MH2

climber
Apr 14, 2013 - 01:42am PT
It may prove more fruitful to talk about chess than to talk about consciousness. You can describe chess and play it, but do you KNOW WHAT IT IS?

You can observe consciousness. Can you find patterns in it?

Try to put yourself in the place of a dog watching chess. Why can it not see patterns and analyze them and learn how to play?

If a dog is too stupid to play chess, perhaps humans are to stupid to understand consciousness. That would not mean that consciousness is beyond understanding, unless we are as smart as anything can possibly be.
splitter

Trad climber
Cali Hodad, surfing the galactic plane ~:~
Apr 14, 2013 - 01:57am PT
you can see it in their eyes
i locked eyes with a deer once. i was hiking over and up to the wheeler crest from the left side where the treeline dips down and i stopped and looked up directly into this stags eyes. it was about 20 yards away, but we were connected as if we were five feet away from each other in a walk in closet and with no way out. what seemed like minutes probably only lasted for 10-15 seconds (count them; one thousand one, one thousand two.../long time to be frozen in time & space with a wild creature). it was very intense (what i sensed coming from it) perhaps the first time for it, just like it was the first time for me. it was probably reading me, much better than i was reading it.

i diverted my eyes for just the briefest of seconds (.5-1 sec) probably just half a second, and when i looked back, it was gone...poof simply disappeared back into the forest. i didn't turn my head at all, i just rotated my eyes to the left for a brief moment. i am pretty sure that if i had maintained eye contact, so would have it. there was no danger for myself, just a fascinating experience that i wish i would have maintained a little longer.

the intensity in the deer's concentration was almost palatable. i suspect it had been watching me, and new i wasn't aware of its presence at first, until our eyes made contact. until then, it was waiting for me to pass by unnoticed.

BASE104's experience with the grizzly bear must have been extremely intense...YIKES! way to keep your cool, bro!!
Messages 13361 - 13380 of total 22344 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
Post a Reply
 
Our Guidebooks
Check 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks


Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Review Categories
Recent Route Beta
Recent Gear Reviews