Having to click to view images sucks!

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 20 of total 81 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Levy

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Topic Author's Original Post - Apr 17, 2019 - 01:49pm PT
I must express my dismay at the new format here in which images do not appear and you have to click on a link to view them(if still available). This ruins the flow of trip reports and other useful information that used to make this site great.

Now it sucks! Thanks for ruining this website, administrators & Chris. I for one will be a much more infrequent visitor to this site now.
JLP

Social climber
The internet
Apr 17, 2019 - 02:01pm PT
+1.

Managing this site is clearly beyond RJ's pay grade.
Ezra Ellis

Trad climber
North wet, and Da souf
Apr 17, 2019 - 02:01pm PT
+1
I really have appreciated this site.
I sincerely Thank Chris Mac for creating this place.

It seems like a sledge hammer has been used, where a scalpel seems more appropriate.
Many of my trip reports are almost unreadable, I have never posted a picture that wasn’t my own.
Mike Bolte

Trad climber
Planet Earth
Apr 17, 2019 - 02:04pm PT
It is a little hard to figure out the new rules. Some photos remain, some have live links, some have dead links. I'm downloading the best threads and wish I had been doing so all along when they were complete with photos!

As many have noted, this is Chris' site, he can do what he wants and we can choose to participate or not.

But, it would be nice if he/the owners were a bit more transparent. In particular, when an announcement is made about new rules or a reminder of old rules, and 250 posts are made I response that include maybe 10 that have articulate requests for clarification, it would be nice to have responses to those requests!
Sierra Ledge Rat

Mountain climber
Old and Broken Down in Appalachia
Apr 17, 2019 - 02:36pm PT
That's gotta change
johntp

Trad climber
Punter
Apr 17, 2019 - 02:39pm PT
But, it would be nice if he/the owners were a bit more transparent.

Would be nice if the hosts would let us know where this is headed. The lack of communication from the hosts leads to speculation. RJ has posted up a bit but in reality tells us nothing about where the forum is headed.
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Apr 17, 2019 - 02:59pm PT
self destruction on the part of RJ and C mac. When DMT is gone you know you killed the goose that layed the golden egg....
johntp

Trad climber
Punter
Apr 17, 2019 - 03:06pm PT
self destruction on the part of RJ and C mac.

Not quite right. CMac has many economic facets. The forum is a sideline. This forum probably cost him more than it is worth, both money and time.

If the forum evaporates, he won't take time to look back. You assume he cares about the forum. As I see it, the forum is a pain in the ass.
Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Apr 17, 2019 - 03:13pm PT
Tell me it's not true. They deleted Bachar's pictures?

Sacrilege.
johntp

Trad climber
Punter
Apr 17, 2019 - 03:31pm PT
Tell me it's not true. They deleted Bachar's pictures?

Sacrilege.

Scorched earth.
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Apr 17, 2019 - 03:37pm PT
It may not be economic self destruction but it certainly is blowing up an iconic forum that he created....
tradmanclimbs

Ice climber
Pomfert VT
Apr 17, 2019 - 03:52pm PT
It actually takes a ton of work to edit and contribute quality material to a site like this. DMT is one of the most respected voices on the internet. When DMT packs up and leaves you know you messed up bigtime....
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Apr 17, 2019 - 03:54pm PT
Could not agree more ,Tradman.
jeff constine

Trad climber
Ao Namao
Apr 17, 2019 - 04:55pm PT
Super Chopo is slowly going down the tubes.
throwpie

Trad climber
Berkeley
Apr 17, 2019 - 05:13pm PT
A few years ago I started the “old camp four etc photos” thread. It became a pretty groovy little deal for some of us old stuck-in-the-past geezers . Now I see that because Mouse got the chop all his photos have been disappeared. That sucks.
Splater

climber
Grey Matter
Apr 17, 2019 - 05:21pm PT
"You assume he cares about the forum. As I see it, the forum is a pain in the ass."

That gets at the root of motivations.
It seems that our fearless leader didn't use the forum much himself in recent years,
instead putting their efforts into the gear review website, so why would they care about this forum?
In the first 15 years, CMac posted at an average rate of 269 times per year.
In the past 3.4 years, he posted at a rate of 56 times per year, only about 1/5 as much.
klaus

Big Wall climber
6th and Mission
Apr 17, 2019 - 05:25pm PT
most of my photos are now gone even though I am the owner of them. I saw this coming years ago when you all said the internet is "forever"

Goodbye Supertopo
monolith

climber
state of being
Apr 17, 2019 - 05:30pm PT
FYI, hot-linking to a pic is never copyright infringement, cuz there is no actual copying and storing.

https://photocopyrightlaw.com/can-embedding-hotlinking-or-inline-linking-constitute-copyright-infringement/

On the other hand, no memes is a good thing.
RJ Spurrier

SuperTopo staff member
Apr 17, 2019 - 06:04pm PT
Ksolem:
Tell me it's not true. They deleted Bachar's pictures?

Don't believe the hype. No one deleted Bachar's pictures.

Bachar posted 2,582 times on SuperTopo.

He never uploaded a single image to SuperTopo.

He used the [img] tag instead and hotlinked to his images hosted elsewhere instead. They still work, just now with a link.

monolith:
You are misinformed. The article you linked to is out of date, even though it was a prominent view following Google's 2017 win on hotlinking. Subsequent 2018 case law decided that there is a separation between Google's particular hot-linking tactics as a search engine, which was ruled as protected from infringement, from the hot-linking/embedding of non-search engine sites such as news sites (and ST too) which are infringing when they display a hot-linked image (like our [img] tag used to function). I suspect that Yahoo and Gannett had some pretty smart lawyers, and yet they lost that battle. The likely cost in legal fees take on the good fight in hopes of overturning that ruling are daunting.

rj




zBrown

Ice climber
Apr 17, 2019 - 06:13pm PT
However, let us not forget about dominio publico {}

Something that has been overlooked around here.


Forrest conceded that embedding specific copyrighted content, including the Brady photo, might still be legal. She said there were “genuine questions” about whether Goldman’s Snapchat post effectively put his photo in the public domain, and that there’s “a very serious and strong fair use defense” for using the photo to illustrate a related story. But that kind of case-by-case judgment would be very different from — and more ambiguous than — the blanket protection of the server test.

Public domain, permission, gift, purchase, trade, barter, inheritance ...

Ownership "rights" accrue in many ways



I just stumbled on this thread after people complaining on picture removal on another thread. I posted a lot of copyrighted pictures that I had permission from owner to use and they have been deleted from my folder, I believe due to a drop in number of uploaded pictures.

I guess I better go delete some pictures.
Messages 1 - 20 of total 81 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta